Tag: troops in Cyprus

  • ROS-LEHTINEN: Time for Turkey to leave Cyprus in peace – Washington Times

    ROS-LEHTINEN: Time for Turkey to leave Cyprus in peace – Washington Times

    Long-standing occupation amounts to annexation

    Illustration Cyprus under Turkey by John Camejo for The Washington Times

    Since its invasion of Cyprus in 1974, Turkey has claimed that it was acting as a protector and guarantor of the island’s security. But a closer examination of its actions on Cyprus indicates motivations of a very different character. Turkey’s invasion resulted in hundreds of thousands of Greek Cypriot refugees, who have been unable to return to their homes for almost 40 years. The international community has repeatedly condemned the illegal military occupation of Cyprus by Turkish troops. The United Nations Security Council has passed 75 resolutions calling for Turkey to allow Greek Cypriots to return to their homes and to withdraw its troops from Cyprus. Yet Turkey continues its occupation.

    More than 40,000 heavily armed Turkish soldiers are occupying the northern part of the country, with one Turkish soldier for every two Turkish-Cypriots. The presence of this overwhelming force cannot be justified by the claims that they are needed to prevent any renewal of violence. In fact, since the 2003 opening of the border between the two communities, more than 17 million intercommunal visits have occurred without conflict.

    The result of this occupation by foreign troops is that many Cypriot neighborhoods in the occupied areas remain vacant or in a state of disrepair. One of the most tragic examples is the Varosha region of Famagusta. Once an important commercial and tourism center for the island, Varosha was fenced off following the invasion, and access has been prohibited for all except Turkish military forces. Over the years, this area has become a virtual ghost town.

    The desolation of Cypriot properties and cultural sites is not restricted to Varosha but is a reality in all the areas under Turkish military occupation. In fact, an estimated 520 Greek Orthodox churches and chapels, and 17 monasteries in the occupied areas have been pillaged, vandalized or destroyed. Often these religious sites have been converted into stables, bars, nightclubs, casinos or hotels, leaving more than 15,000 religious artifacts unaccounted for. This widespread destruction of Cypriot historic, religious and cultural identity certainly does not seem like the behavior of a “protective guardian.”

    Turkey also continues to interfere in the domestic affairs of Cyprus, especially the negotiations on reunification. The goal of these talks is a Cypriot-developed, mutually agreeable settlement based on a bizonal, bicommunal federation with political equality, including a single sovereignty, single citizenship and single international presence. But instead of allowing the representatives from the Turkish-Cypriot community to engage freely in the talks, the Turkish government has imposed its own criteria, which has made an agreement all but impossible.

    Turkey also has tried to limit Cyprus‘ sovereign rights to develop its energy resources. Despite the island’s critical energy needs, Turkey declared last year that it had “nullified” the exploration agreement between Cyprus and Israel even though it has no right to do so. Turkey escalated the conflict by sending its own ships to the region and even threatened military action if Cyprus continued in its project with Israel. Although from the beginning, Republic of Cyprus President Demetris Christofias guaranteed that any energy resources discovered would be used for the benefit of all Cypriots, Turkish officials claimed their actions were to protect the rights of the Turkish-Cypriots.

    Reports by the Turkish-Cypriot media indicate that the Turkish government continues to promote illegal immigration by Turks to the northern occupied areas of Cyprus with the goal of changing the demographic composition of the island. According to people administering the occupied area, there are an estimated 160,000 settlers from Turkey, many of whom occupy the homes of the evicted Greek-Cypriots. However, reports in the Turkish-Cypriot press from Turkish-Cypriots who live among the Turkish settlers put this number between 500,000 and 800,000. A recent “census” in the north indicated that the total population in the north had increased to nearly 300,000 people. Just 88,900 of them were native Turkish-Cypriots, who are outnumbered by illegal Turkish immigrants by a ratio of almost 2-1.

    Ankara’s support for these illegal immigrants is not welcomed by the native Turkish-Cypriot community. In fact, Stella Altziman, who resides in that region of Cyprus, wrote in 2010: “Due to constant migration from Turkey, [the northern occupied area] is like a Turkish province” and the native Turkish-Cypriots have become a minority in their own land. Last year, many Turkish-Cypriots protested Turkey’s policies toward Cyprus, with some carrying banners that read, “Ankara, get your hands off our shores.” Yet Turkey continues to flood its areas of occupation with illegal Turkish immigrants. In his visit to Cyprus last year, Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan mocked the Turkish-Cypriots, stating, “If you don’t want us to send people, you need to have more babies.”

    By its occupation, Turkey is “guaranteeing” nothing but a creeping annexation. It is time for Turkey to withdraw its military troops, end all support for illegal immigration to Cyprus and let the true inhabitants of the island determine their own future. Only then will the long-suffering Cypriot people finally enjoy the peace and security they have been trying so desperately to achieve for decades.

    Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, Florida Republican, is chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee.

    via ROS-LEHTINEN: Time for Turkey to leave Cyprus in peace – Washington Times.

  • We’re failing to follow Turkey’s sea change

    We’re failing to follow Turkey’s sea change

    IN A SPEECH, he made at the University of Bosporus, 10 days ago, Turkey’s Minister of European Affairs Egemen Bagis, said that Turkey would even discuss the withdrawal of all troops from Cyprus.

    “In Cyprus, Greece also has troops and Britain has military bases. If there is a possibility, for all the troops to withdraw, then come and let’s talk about it.”

    cyprusmapAgreeing to discuss the full withdrawal of Turkish troops from Cyprus is unprecedented in the history of the Cyprus problem. So much so, it should have become a leading news item in the media. But it was ignored and did not make it into the ongoing Cyprus problem debate.

    Had Bagis said “the army will never withdraw from Cyprus”, or had he repeated what Turkish politicians had all been saying until 2002, namely “the Cyprus problem was solved in 1974”, we would never have heard the end of it.

    It makes you wonder whether we actually want the withdrawal of the Turkish troops or whether their presence suits us, as it ensure the ethnic purity of half the island. Is re-unification a sincere objective, or is partition preferable to the majority of the people? This is, more or less, the historical dilemma that Cypriots are facing and will need to make a final decision on in the next few months.

    In the last eight years Turkey has radically revised its foreign policy. Gone is the view that the country was surrounded by hostile countries, replaced with the doctrine of “zero problems with our neighbours”. Ankara has resolved its disputes with Syria and Russia, improved relations with Greece and has been trying to do the same with Armenia, but it is not making any headway on the Cyprus problem which is poisoning its dealings with the European Union. Turkey wants a Cyprus deal because the net benefits of a solution far outweigh the net losses for maintaining the status quo.

    After 40 years of division, there is a Turkish population in Cyprus which accounts for 20 to 25 per cent of the total. With the passing years, these people have acquired rights in the occupied areas that have been acknowledged by the European Court of Human Rights. Consequently, either we will govern the whole island together or we will split it in two.

    Turkey could push things in either direction, but it seems that, for many important reasons, she would rather have the participation of the Turkish population in the running of the whole island than have total control of half. But to gain participation in running the whole island, the Turkish side would need to give things in exchange – complete withdrawal of troops, a ceiling on the number of Turkish nationals that would be part of the Turkish Cypriot community, a return of territory and a contribution to the compensation fund for properties are some of them.

    The Greek Cypriot side suffers from an inherent weakness by failing to follow this changing Turkish policy and still approaches it with a Cold War mentality. This is why it interprets every change in Turkish positions as a “communications tactic” which nobody else buys.

    But instead of being in denial about these changes, the Cyprus government should have set out its priorities, conveyed them and explained them to its EU partners and sincerely committed itself – not take the EU for a ride as it had done in 2004 – to signing an agreement if these conditions were met. It could also have proposed an international conference in which Greece, Turkey and the EU participated, for overcoming any persistent differences.

    Of course, the choice may be permanent separation, in which case President Christofias would need to muster the courage to negotiate the terms of partition rather than allow it to be imposed by default. We are heading in this direction thanks to the government’s dogmatic position about a Cypriot solution by Cypriots, “without time-frames and arbitration”. Inevitably, we are arriving at partition under the worst possible terms.

    By Makarios Drousiotis
    Published on June 20, 2010

    Source: Cyprus Mail