Tag: Stratfor

  • Hackers expose defence and intelligence officials in US and UK

    Hackers expose defence and intelligence officials in US and UK

    Security breach by ‘hacktivists’ reveals email addresses of 221 British military staff and 242 Nato officials

    Ed Pilkington in New York and Richard Norton-Taylor

    NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen
    Nato secretary general Anders Fogh Rasmussen. More than 200 of his staff have been exposed by Anonymous 'hacktivists'. Photograph: Olivier Hoslet/EPA

    Thousands of British email addresses and encrypted passwords, including those of defence, intelligence and police officials as well as politicians and Nato advisers, have been revealed on the internet following a security breach by hackers.

    Among the huge database of private information exposed by self-styled “hacktivists” are the details of 221 British military officials and 242 Nato staff. Civil servants working at the heart of the UK government – including several in the Cabinet Office as well as advisers to the Joint Intelligence Organisation, which acts as the prime minister’s eyes and ears on sensitive information – have also been exposed.

    The hackers, who are believed to be part of the Anonymous group, gained unauthorised access over Christmas to the account information of Stratfor, a consultancy based in Texas that specialises in foreign affairs and security issues. The database had recorded in spreadsheets the user IDs – usually email addresses – and encrypted passwords of about 850,000 individuals who had subscribed to Stratfor’s website.

    Some 75,000 paying subscribers also had their credit card numbers and addresses exposed, including 462 UK accounts.

    John Bumgarner, an expert in cyber-security at the US Cyber Consequences Unit, a research body in Washington, has analysed the Stratfor breach for the Guardian. He has identified within the data posted by the hackers the details of hundreds of UK government officials, some of whom work in sensitive areas.

    Many of the email addresses are not routinely made public, and the passwords are all encrypted in code that can quickly be cracked using off-the-shelf software.

    Among the leaked email addresses are those of 221 Ministry of Defence officials identified by Bumgarner, including army and air force personnel. Details of a much larger group of US military personnel were leaked. The database has some 19,000 email addresses ending in the .mil domain of the US military.

    In the US case, Bumgarner has found, 173 individuals deployed in Afghanistan and 170 in Iraq can be identified. Personal data from former vice-president Dan Quayle and former secretary of state Henry Kissinger were also released.

    Other UK government departments have been affected: seven officials in the Cabinet Office have had their details exposed, 45 Foreign Office officials, 14 from the Home Office, 67 Scotland Yard and other police officials, and two employees with the royal household.

    There are also 23 people listed who work in the houses of parliament, including Jeremy Corbyn, Labour MP for Islington North, Lady Nicholson and Lord Roper. Corbyn said he had been unaware of the breach, adding that although his email address was public he was disturbed by the idea that his password could be cracked and used to delete or write emails in a way that “could be very damaging”.

    Nicholson, speaking on a phone from Iraq, said she had no idea that her personal information had been hacked. She said she was very unhappy that private individuals had had their fundamental right to privacy violated. “To expose civil servants is monstrously unfair,” she said. “Officials in sensitive areas like defence and the military could even be exposed to threats. Guarding data like this is extremely difficult, but it’s not impossible, and we should do a great deal more.”

    The hacking has had a big impact because Stratfor offers expert analysis of international affairs, including security issues, and attracts subscribers from sensitive government departments.

    The British victims include officials with the Joint Intelligence Organisation (JIO) responsible for assessing intelligence from all sources, including MI6 secret agents.

    A former deputy head of Whitehall’s strategic horizons unit is listed. The unit is part of the JIO based in the Cabinet Officeand was set up four years ago to give early warning of potential serious problems that might have an impact on Britain’s security or environment.

    The extent of the security risk posed by the breach is not known. Bumgarner said officials who did not take extra precautions in securing passwords through dual authentication or other protection systems could find email and other databases they use being compromised. “Any foreign intelligence service targeting Britain could find these emails useful in identifying individuals connected to sensitive government activities,” he said.

    British officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, said they were aware of the hacking but it did not pose a risk to national security. Passwords for their communications within Whitehall would be different from any used to access the Stratfor sites. Whitehall communications would also be protected by extra security walls, officials said.

    However, they added that their personal communications could be at risk if individuals used the same password as they used to access Stratfor for their bank accounts and other personal communications.

    A government spokesman said: “We are aware that subscriber details for the Stratfor website have been published in the public domain. At present, there is no indication of any threat to UK government systems. Advice and guidance on such threats is issued to government departments through the Government Computer Emergency Response Team.”

    Stratfor has taken down its website while it investigates the security breach. The company says it is “working diligently to prevent it from ever happening again”.

    This is just the latest action to hit the headlines by hackers associated with Anonymous. The group, whose loose collection of members are scattered around the world and linked through internet chatrooms, has previously targeted Visa, MasterCard and PayPal in protest at the companies’ refusal to accept donations for the WikiLeaks website.

    www.guardian.co.uk, 8 January 2012

  • Hackers group Anonymous warns of New Years Eve leak

    Hackers group Anonymous warns of New Years Eve leak

    In the latest information breach in retaliation for the prosecution of Bradley Manning, Anonymous releases more data from intelligence analysis firm, Stratfor, and issues a New Years Eve warning.

    Anonymous Stratfor

    “On this date, we will be launching our contributions to project mayhem by attacking multiple law enforcement targets from coast to coast.”

    Anonymous

    31 anonymousMembers of the activist hackers group, Anonymous, calling themselves ‘Antisec’, posted links on the internet to what they said were 75,000 names, addresses, credit card numbers and passwords for Stratfor clients.

    Antisec also said that it revealed another 860,000 user names, email addresses and passwords for those registered to Stratfor, using the data-sharing website Pastebin, and that 50,000 of the email addresses end in .mil and .gov, which are used by the US government.

    Security think tank, Stratfor, gathers intelligence and provides reports on international security and threats to government and private sector security.

    Anonymous hacked into Stratfor’s company data on Christmas Eve, and published what it said was Stratfor’s confidential client which included top security contractors, major technology firms and law enforcement agencies. Reuters news agency reported that the list includes US Vice President Dan Quayle, former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and former CIA director Jim Woolsey. Corporations on the list include Bank of America and Goldman Sachs.

    The hacker collective also used the stolen credit card details to make donations to charities and posted images of the receipts online.

    Antisec said the latest attack is retaliation for the prosecution of US Army private Bradley Manning, who is accused of leaking more than 700,000 US documents to the anti-secrecy website WikiLeaks.

    Pentagon Papers

    New Years Eve threat

    Antisec is now drip feeding information obtained during the security breach. In an internet statement, the group said it warned of another leak on New Year’s Eve as well as what it called “noise demonstrations” outside jails and prisons, presumably to show support of convicted hackers: “On this date, we will be launching our contributions to project mayhem by attacking multiple law enforcement targets from coast to coast.”

    A spokesperson said via Twitter that soon to be released emails from the company would show “Stratfor is not the ‘harmless company’ it tries to paint itself as.”

    Jeffrey Carr, chief executive of Taia Global Inc and author of the book Inside Cyber Warfare: Mapping the Cyber Underworld, warned that future leaks could contain crucial information. “Those emails are going to be dynamite and may provide a lot of useful information to adversaries of the U.S. government,” he told Reuters. However the Pentagon said it was not threatened by the attack.

    Stratfor website down

    Anonymous said it was able to access the information partly because Stratfor did not encrypt it – something that could be a major source of embarrassment for the intelligence firm.

    The Stratfor website has been offline for almost a week since it came under attack almost a week ago. Since then, the company has been communicating through its Facebook page and sending its analysis to members via email.

    In a statement, Stratfor said it “regrets the latest disclosure of information obtained illegally from the company’s data systems,” which included “credit card information of paid subscribers and many email addresses of those who receive Stratfor’s free services”.

    Anonymous has launched a series of hacking attacks over the last year against companies that it perceives to be enemies of the anti-secrecy site, WikiLeaks.

    www.channel4.com, 31 December 2011

  • Will the West Accept Rising Turkey?

    Will the West Accept Rising Turkey?

    By George Friedman

    Turkey’s Justice and Development Party (AKP) won Parliamentary elections June 12, which means it will remain in power for a third term. The popular vote, divided among a number of parties, made the AKP the most popular party by far, although nearly half of the electorate voted for other parties, mainly the opposition and largely secularist Republican People’s Party (CHP). More important, the AKP failed to win a super-majority, which would have given it the power to unilaterally alter Turkey’s constitution. This was one of the major issues in the election, with the AKP hoping for the super-majority and others trying to block it. The failure of the AKP to achieve the super-majority leaves the status quo largely intact. While the AKP remains the most powerful party in Turkey, able to form governments without coalition partners, it cannot rewrite the constitution without accommodating its rivals.

    One way to look at this is that Turkey continues to operate within a stable framework, one that has been in place for almost a decade. The AKP is the ruling party. The opposition is fragmented along ideological lines, which gives the not overwhelmingly popular AKP disproportionate power. The party can set policy within the constitution but not beyond the constitution. In this sense, the Turkish political system has produced a long-standing reality. Few other countries can point to such continuity of leadership. Obviously, since Turkey is a democracy, the rhetoric is usually heated and accusations often fly, ranging from imminent military coups to attempts to impose a religious dictatorship. There may be generals thinking of coups and there may be members of AKP thinking of religious dictatorship, but the political process has worked effectively to make such things hard to imagine. In Turkey, as in every democracy, the rhetoric and the reality must be carefully distinguished.

    Turkey’s Shifting Policy

    That said, the AKP has clearly taken Turkey in new directions in both domestic and foreign policy. In domestic policy, the direction is obvious. While the CHP has tried to vigorously contain religion within the private sphere, the AKP has sought to recognize Turkey’s Islamic culture and has sought a degree of integration with the political structure.

    This has had two results. Domestically, while the AKP has had the strength to create a new political sensibility, it has not had the strength to create new institutions based on Islamic principles (assuming this is one of its desired goals). Nevertheless, the secularists, deriving their legitimacy from the founder of modern Turkey, Kemal Ataturk, have viewed his legacy and their secular rights – one of which is the right of women not to have to wear headscarves – as being under attack. Hence, the tenor of public discourse has been volatile. Indeed, there is a constant sense of crisis in Turkey, as the worst fears of the secularists collide with the ambitions of the AKP. Again, we regard these ambitions as modest, not because we know what AKP leaders intend in their heart, but simply because they lack the power to go further regardless of intentions.

    via RealClearWorld – Will the West Accept Rising Turkey?.