Tag: Sanctions against Iran

  • Exclusive: Halkbank to handle Iran payments so long as legal

    Exclusive: Halkbank to handle Iran payments so long as legal

    By Jonathon Burch and Ebru Tuncay

    ANKARA | Thu Jan 26, 2012 8:36am EST

    (Reuters) – Turkish lender Halkbank will continue to handle customers’ oil payments to Iran as long as they comply with international regulations, the bank’s general manager said in the wake of fresh, unilateral U.S. and EU sanctions.

    Halkbank’s dealings with Iran drew attention last year when Indian refiners disclosed they were channeling oil payments through the Turkish bank as their own central bank had shut its payment facility, fearing U.S. retribution.

    Majority state-owned Halkbank is Turkey’s sixth largest bank, based on unconsolidated assets, and has a representative office in Tehran.

    It also processes payments to Iran by Tupras, Turkey’s sole refiner and a unit of Koc Holding, the country’s largest conglomerate, according to energy sector officials.

    General Manager Suleyman Aslan denied there had been U.S. pressure to stop handling transactions, as the bank was not acting illegally. He said a decision to reject an application from another Indian refiner late last year was unrelated to its trade deals with Iran.

    In an interview with Reuters Aslan said “communication channels” with all sides, including the United States, were open and that apart from India, the bank was not handling payments to Iran from any other third country.

    He said decisions on whether to take business were based on banking rather than political criteria.

    “We do not make any specific decision based on Iran or any other country. We have customers, and these customers approach us and we look at their transactions. This transaction may be in India, it may be in Iran it may be in another country,” he said.

    “If it is legitimate business, we will carry out the job within the framework of international regulations and international standard practice.”

    On December 31, President Barack Obama signed into law a fresh set of sanctions targeting financial institutions that deal with Iran’s central bank to stem the flow of oil revenue and persuade Tehran to abandon a suspected nuclear weapons program.

    The European Union followed with a ban on Iranian oil this week that is expected to take full effect within six months.

    Heavily dependent on imports of oil and gas from its eastern neighbor, Muslim NATO member Turkey opposed the imposition of U.N. sanctions on the Islamic Republic in 2010 but says it is abiding by those measures.

    However, Turkish officials have repeatedly said there is no obligation for Turkey to enforce tougher unilateral sanctions subsequently announced by the United States and European Union.

    “If after today processing these transactions brings about problems or becomes unlawful, we will not process them, however, according to the information that we are receiving now, these transactions are not unlawful,” Aslan said.

    “Therefore, if our customers want to continue – they can.”

    India, according to a government official in New Delhi this week, has agreed with Iran to settle part of their annual $12 billion oil trade in rupees.

    And one refiner, Hindustan Petroleum Corp has agreed to double its imports from Saudi Arabia from April, in a move that could replace purchases of Iranian crude.

    “TRANSPARENT”

    Indian state-run refiners began using Halkbank to pay Iran for imported oil in July.

    In December, however, Halkbank, which is 75 percent state-owned, declined to open an account for an additional Indian refiner, Bharat Petroleum Corp BPCL, fuelling speculation the lender may be planning to stop payments to Iran.

    However, Aslan said the decision to refuse BPCL was because it was unable to provide a satisfactory reference to Halkbank and was unrelated to concerns over doing more business with Iran.

    Asked if Halkbank would consider dealing with BPCL in the future, Aslan said even with the necessary reference the bank “may still not” handle payments from the refiner and that “this will depend on the situation at the time.”

    U.S. Treasury officials have visited Turkey several times to advise banks dealing with proscribed Iranian entities that they risked being frozen out of the U.S. financial system.

    Asked if U.S. officials had met directly with Halkbank, Aslan said: “We have had meetings in the past,” but he denied the bank had come under any pressure.

    “We are pursuing this matter in a transparent way because we are not doing anything illegal, we are handling this matter in a very open way by talking to all sides. All our communication channels are open.”

    This month a Turkish energy ministry official confirmed Turkey would seek a U.S. waiver for Tupras, a major customer for Iranian oil.

    Obama could grant waivers to institutions in countries that significantly reduce dealings with Iran.

    Tupras, according to industry sources familiar with the company’s strategy, is seeking to buy more oil from Saudi Arabia to reduce dependence on Iran for supplies.

    Turkey imports over 200,000 barrels per day, around 30 percent of its consumption, from Iran.

    On a visit to Ankara this month, Iran’s foreign minister projected annual trade with Turkey doubling in the coming four years to reach $30 billion in 2015, while Turkey’s urbanization minister said the two countries were planning important steps to ease money transfer processes.

    (Writing by Jonathon Burch; Editing by Simon Cameron-Moore)

    via Exclusive: Halkbank to handle Iran payments so long as legal | Reuters.

  • Reluctant Turkey ‘will join oil embargo’ on Iran

    Reluctant Turkey ‘will join oil embargo’ on Iran

    Thomas Seibert

    Jan 24, 2012

    fo24ja TurkeyIran

    A bazaar in Tehran is laden with fruit, but as the western sanctions bite Iran may find international trade increasingly difficult.

    ISTANBUL // Turkey yesterday criticised the decision by the European Union to impose an import ban on Iranian oil, but Ankara is unlikely to risk irritating western partners over the issue, analysts said.

    “This will raise political tensions” in the region, Ibrahim Kalin, a foreign policy adviser to Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Turkey’s prime minister, said in a television interview. “Channels for negotiations have to remain open,” Mr Kalin told AHaber.

    Mr Kalin called for new negotiations about Iran’s nuclear programme, which the EU and the US have said may have military purposes, a charge the Iranians deny. “The door is open,” Mr Kalin said about the readiness of Turkey, the only Muslim Nato member country, to host new talks between the West and Iran in Istanbul. The last effort ended without agreement.

    Turkey has been arguing that, as a direct neighbour of Iran and important buyer of Iranian oil, it has a special interest in calming tensions in a region.

    “Decreasing the tension in the region is also to Turkey’s benefit,” a Turkish official said. “That’s why we encourage everybody to find a diplomatic solution to the issue.”

    Ankara said it will not take part in possible military strikes against Iranian nuclear sites that are reportedly being planned by Israel, a former partner of Turkey.

    The Istanbul-based Cumhuriyet newspaper reported yesterday that the Turkish military was drawing up plans to prevent Israeli fighter planes from crossing Turkish airspace if there are bombing missions to Iran. There was no official comment from the defence ministry, but a Turkish diplomat said that “every country, every air force is entitled to monitor and defend its airspace”.

    Taner Yildiz, Turkey’s energy minister, said this month that his country was not obliged to follow sanctions by the EU or the US against Iran. “For us, decisions taken outside the United Nations are not binding,” Mr Yildiz said. Turkish oil imports from Iran would continue.

    As Iran supplies around a third of Turkish oil needs, a reduction of those imports could have dramatic consequences for Turkey’s thriving economy. Last week, Turkey and Iran said they were aiming to raise their bilateral trade to $30 billion (Dh110bn) a year by 2015 – twice the volume of today. Much of today’s trade is oil and gas from Iran to Turkey.

    But days after the pledge to double bilateral trade, news reports said Turkey had begun to explore the possibility to raise oil imports from Saudi Arabia in an effort to lower its dependency on Iran. The Turkish government has not commented on the reports.

    Commentary: Sanctions squeeze Iran, but the street isn’t suffering yet

    Last Updated:Jan 24, 2012

    The goal of US and EU sanctions against Iran’s central bank may be to economically cripple the country, but life on the ground suggests that still seems like wishful thinking.

    Jason Rezaian

    “Turkey says decisions by the US and the EU are not binding for itself, but ultimately Turkey will not side with Iran when it comes down to hard decisions,” Mehmet Sahin, a Middle East specialist at Ankara’s Gazi University, said yesterday.

    Sercan Dogan, an analyst at the Centre for Middle Eastern Strategic Studies (Orsam), an Ankara-based think tank, also argued that Turkey had little choice but to go along with western efforts to increase Iran’s isolation.

    “Turkey will not be able to withstand the US for long in this respect”, Mr Dogan wrote in an analysis for the Orsam webpage last week.

    In 2010, Turkey raised eyebrows among its western partners when it presented a joint agreement with Brazil and Iran aimed at ending the nuclear row. The agreement was swiftly rejected by the EU and the US.

    Since then, Ankara has demonstrated that its Nato membership and western alliances take priority over relations with Iran. Last year, Ankara angered Tehran by giving the green light for the installation of a radar system in Anatolia that forms part of Nato’s anti-missile shield.

    Iran said the system’s real purpose was to protect Israel against counter-strikes after a possible attack on Iranian nuclear sites.

    But Turkey stood by its decision despite sharp criticism from Iran and from parts of the opposition at home.

    Some observers have warned that Iran is trying to use Ankara to buy more time in its stand-off with the West.

    “Iran pushes Turkey in front of the international community whenever the international community puts pressure on it”, Emre Uslu, a columnist, wrote in the English-language Today’s Zaman newspaper last week.

    “During these periods, Iran treats Turkey as if it is its closest ally and uses Turkey both as a fence to hide behind and as a gateway to weakening the international sanctions,” he wrote. A Turkish diplomat, asked for his reaction, dismissed Mr Uslu’s criticism. Trying to de-escalate the situation is in Turkey’s interest, he said.

    via Reluctant Turkey ‘will join oil embargo’ on Iran – The National.

  • Iran paid through Turkey for oil sales to India

    Iran paid through Turkey for oil sales to India

    By

    AFP

    Published Saturday, January 21, 2012

    Iran is being paid for oil sales to India through a Turkish bank, the managing director of the National Iranian Oil Company said Friday on Mehr news agency.

    “There is no problem with exports to India and money continues to be transferred through a Turkish bank,” said Mohsen Ghamsari.

    That bank, however, has warned Iranian authorities that it will not take on new clients making money transfers to pay for Iran’s oil exports, Ghamsari was quoted as saying.

    India, which buys about 400,000 barrels per day from Iran, had expressed concern that this channel could no longer be used to make payments.

    Ghamsari said that “part of the money owed to Iran by India was transferred through Turkey” after noting that the Iranian central bank also had “other channels” to receive its oil revenues.

    India announced on Tuesday it would continue buying Iranian oil despite mounting US and EU pressure on the Islamic republic’s clients to limit their purchases as long as Iran pursues its controversial nuclear programme.

    Iran is India’s second-largest oil supplier after Saudi Arabia, providing around 12 percent of the fast-growing country’s needs at an annual cost of around ê12 billion.

    China, another major client, has also rejected Western sanctions on Iran, while Japan and South Korea have expressed reservations over the consequences such sanctions could have on their economies.

    Turkey, which opposes unilateral sanctions against Iran, is also a major client, purchasing gas in addition to oil. Iranian exports to Turkey, mostly from its energy sector, were worth over 12 billion dollars in 2011, according to Iran’s media.

    This week, during a visit by Iranian Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Salehi to Turkey, the two countries said they plan to boost annual trade to 30 billion dollars by 2015.

    The West fears Iran is trying to build a nuclear bomb. Tehran insists its nuclear programme is purely for civilian use and refuses to abandon its uranium enrichment activities despite four sets of UN sanctions.

    via Iran paid through Turkey for oil sales to India – Emirates 24/7.

  • Israel Matzav: That’s rain, right? Turkey spits in Obama’s face

    Israel Matzav: That’s rain, right? Turkey spits in Obama’s face

    Obama in OsloPresident Obama’s good friend, Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, has effectively spit in Obama’s face by having his Foreign Ministry’s spokesman announce that Turkey is not bound by US sanctions on Iran – only by UN sanctions. Although Turkey has said similar things in the past, Obama had been trying to convince the Turks to go along with US sanctions (Hat Tip: Joshua I).

    Foreign Ministry spokesman Selçuk Ünal said Turkey would evaluate the content of the US sanctions but it “does not feel it is bound by any other sanctions.”

    Ünal spoke during a weekly news conference, which followed a meeting between Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoğlu and Iran’s parliamentary speaker, Ali Larijani.

    On Thursday, Japan pledged to buy less Iranian oil, boosting the US campaign a day after China reacted coolly to the idea. Japan imports about 10 percent of its oil from Iran while Turkey imports about 30 percent from Iran.

    via Israel Matzav: That’s rain, right? Turkey spits in Obama’s face.

  • Turkey Wants to Resume Talks on Iranian Nuclear Program

    Turkey Wants to Resume Talks on Iranian Nuclear Program

    Turkey Wants to Resume Talks on Iranian Nuclear Program

    Publication: Eurasia Daily Monitor Volume: 9 Issue: 6
    January 10, 2012
    By: Saban Kardas
    Turkish Foreign Minister, Ahmet Davutoglu, paid a crucial visit to Tehran on January 6, amidst the increasing confrontation between Iran and the West. The visit mainly provided an opportunity to address bilateral issues, as it followed a heated debate in recent months which questions whether Turkey and Iran were involved in an undeclared rivalry in the Arab Spring. The two countries’ diverging positions on Syria, Turkey’s decision to host NATO’s early warning radar, as well as differences on the Palestinians’ quest for recognition, arguably pitted the two against each other. The confrontational mood was further worsened by harsh statements against Turkey by Iranian politicians and high-ranking officials (EDM, October 11, 2011).

    As such statements even led to direct threats voiced by some Iranian lawmakers and military officers, indicating that Iran might take military action against NATO facilities in Turkey, Davutoglu was prompted to convey his uneasiness and demand an explanation. Iranian Foreign Minister, Ali Akbar Salehi, visited Ankara in an effort to allay Ankara’s growing concerns. Reiterating the two countries’ friendship, Salehi sought to assure his Turkish counterpart that such remarks reflected personal opinions and did not represent official Iranian policy on Turkey (Anadolu Ajansi, December 14, 2011).

    Ankara also downplayed such threatening remarks as personal opinions, in an effort to maintain channels for dialogue with Tehran. Though not hiding the differences of opinion on regional issues, Davutoglu and other Turkish officials prefer to focus on issues of converging views and continue to view Tehran as a major stakeholder in the region whose cooperation is essential. More importantly, Davutoglu is keen to reassure his Iranian counterparts that Turkey will not take part in any direct military action against Iran, which seems as a calculated move to comfort Tehran and convince it to steer away from the path of escalation.

    With such considerations in mind, Davutoglu paid a working visit to Iran on January 6, to meet Salehi and other Iranian officials. Davutoglu worked hard to stress the defensive nature of the ballistic missile shield and reiterated that Turkey would not let its territory be used in any attack against Iran. The two ministers also agreed to continue to discuss regional issues, and meet at least twice each year (Anadolu Ajansi, January 5).

    Beyond the immediate Turkish-Iranian frictions, Davutoglu addressed a number of regional issues with Iran. Foregoing the speculations of rivalry, Davutoglu invited his Iranian counterparts to work together in order to address the escalating tensions in the region, which some claim could lead to Sunni-Shiite sectarian divisions. In the last two days, because the uprising in Syria, the ongoing political crisis in Iraq, and the situation in Bahrain involve some sectarian elements, Davutoglu increasingly refers to an imminent danger of sectarian conflict and warns against a new Cold War in the Middle East (Dogan, January 8).

    Moreover, the uncertain future of the dispute over the Iranian nuclear program, especially in view of US sanctions policy and the Iranian brinkmanship in the Strait of Hormuz is a growing concern for Turkey. Ankara recognizes Iran’s right to develop peaceful nuclear technology, but also invites the country to be more transparent about its ongoing program and allay concerns on the part of Western powers.

    Since the talks held between Iran and the P5+1 in Istanbul one year ago, diplomatic channels were largely closed. In order to push things forward on that front, Davutoglu seems to have attempted shuttle diplomacy. In the wake of his Tehran trip, he announced that he was in touch with Catherine Ashton, the EU’s foreign policy chief, on this issue. Davutoglu raised expectations by maintaining that both parties were ready to resume nuclear talks in Turkey. Earlier, Salehi also expressed his readiness to return to nuclear talks in a suitable time and venue agreed upon by the parties, adding that Turkey would be the best option (Anadolu Ajansi, January 8). Commenting on this development, US State Department spokesperson, Victoria Nuland, said that the US remained in consultation with Turkey over Davutoglu’s trip and agrees with Turkey’s goal of bringing Iran back to the negotiating table and complying with its international obligations, though they might differ on tactics. She also emphasized Washington’s readiness to resume discussions, though adding that Iran has yet to formally convey its decision to start the talks (Today’s Zaman, January 7).

    Adding urgency to the matter, the United States and its European allies are initiating a new wave of sanctions to pressure Iran on the economic front. The sanctions recently approved by President Barack Obama involve penalizing the financial institutions doing business with Iran as well as halting oil imports from Iran, by targeting its Central Bank. Turkey abides by the sanctions regime introduced by the UN Security Council in the summer of 2010, but refuses to implement the unilateral Western sanctions on the grounds that they are non-binding. However, there has been growing US expectation for Turkey to join the new sanctions, while Ankara seeks an exemption, given its oil and gas imports from Iran, requiring it to work with Iranian financial institutions.

    A visit by a US delegation led by Deputy Secretary of State, William Burns, to Ankara on January 9, offered an opportunity to discuss these issues. During his talks with Turkish officials, the US delegation, among others, solicited Turkey’s support for unilateral sanctions. Prior to the meeting, some senior US Congressmen and diplomats visited Turkish government officials and bureaucrats, underscoring the importance attached to this issue (Haberturk, January 9).

    Commenting on the visit, Nuland dismissed the argument that Turkey opposes US policy on Iran. She emphasized that the US acknowledges Turkey’s sensitivities given Ankara’s trade ties, but the two sides will continue their dialogue on how to maximize the pressures on Iran to force it to comply with its international obligations (Haberturk, January 10). Turkish sources also reported that Ankara does not want to see a further escalation of the already heightened tensions in the region (Sabah, January 10).

    Uneasy at the growing escalation, Ankara seeks to dampen tensions through a reassertion of its facilitator role and engaging the parties, without taking any side. Once again, Turkey is walking a diplomatic tightrope due to its difficult neighbor’s relations with the West.

    https://jamestown.org/program/turkey-wants-to-resume-talks-on-iranian-nuclear-program/
  • Will Turkey stand against the West ? It refuses to join the sanctions against Iran

    Will Turkey stand against the West ? It refuses to join the sanctions against Iran

    Turkey refused to joint the sanctions against Iran which are offered by the USA and the Western European countries.

    flAccording to Interfax news agency the USA tries to involve Turkey in actions against Iran. Turkey was pressed also in frame of the NATO. According to the source Turkish participation in the anti-Iranian actions is rated highly as Turkey has close economical relations with Iran.

    Events around Iran are developing too fast especially during the last time. On January 9 Iranian side announced that Iranian Fordow factory started the enrichment of uranium.

    IAEA confirmed that all nuclear materials are under its supervision.

    After the announcement by IAEA the USA again called on Iran to stop the enrichment of uranium and to fulfill the resolution by the UN Security Council.

    The USA and the European countries call on Iran to stop the own nuclear program. Official Tehran has announced for many times that its nuclear program is peaceful and is just for the energy claims of the country.

    Relations between Iran and the Western countries are too strained and nuclear program is one of the main themes for it. USA and European countries sometimes hold sanctions against Iranian officials. Economical sanctions are also held. The last scandal took place over Strait of Homruz. Iranian side warned it would close Homruz if embargo is put on Iranian oil to the European countries. The USA announced that Homruz is a border which is not worthy to pass.

    Remind that Turkish-Iranian relations became strained when Turkey let NATO radars to be situated in its territory. Iranian side announced that this actions was directed against Iran for sure.

    via Will Turkey stand against the West ? It refuses to join the sanctions against Iran.