Tag: Recep Tayyip Erdogan

12th president of Turkey

  • Turkey’s election could set its path: stronger democracy or autocracy

    Turkey’s election could set its path: stronger democracy or autocracy

    Turkey election

    Turkish voters go to the polls Sunday in the culmination of an acrimonious election campaign pitting a fractious opposition against the long-dominant ruling party and the country’s most divisive figure: President Recep Tayyip Erdogan.

    The parliamentary vote, analysts say, could determine whether this dynamic nation of 80 million fortifies its vibrant democracy or slides further toward autocratic rule dominated by Erdogan, a charismatic leader who inspires fierce loyalty among supporters and revulsion from critics.

    The president has called on the electorate to give his ruling Justice and Development party a supermajority in the parliament, which would facilitate constitutional changes bolstering his power as president.

    Turkey elections

    Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan greets supporters in Eskisehir, Turkey, on June 5, 2015.

    (Kayhan Ozer / Presidential Press Office)

    However, polls have suggested that the party will garner 42% to 45% of the vote, which would be a significant reversal of fortune from the nearly 50% it took in the 2011 general election. A recent economic slowdown and increase in unemployment have unnerved many voters.

    The election has been marred by violence, as tension and polarization sweep Turkey. On Friday, an explosion at a final rally of the People’s Democratic Party killed two supporters and wounded 100 in southeastern Diyarbakir, according to local news accounts.

    The prospect of diminished support for Erdogan has raised hope among opposition blocs, including the upstart Peoples’ Democratic Party, or HDP, which has endeavored to expand its base beyond the nation’s Kurdish minority. The left-wing party aims to capture the votes of liberals who have grown disillusioned with both Erdogan and traditional parties, such as the center-left Republican People’s Party, the main opposition bloc.

    “We have to make a new start by putting people at the heart of the system,” Selahattin Demirtas, HDP leader and human rights lawyer, said in April.
    lRelated
    Pope Francis’ Armenian genocide remarks prompt strong response

    Europe
    Pope Francis’ Armenian genocide remarks prompt strong response

    See all related
    8

    Erdogan has demanded for months that his support base deliver a resounding victory for the conservative ruling party with Islamist roots. The party has ruled Turkey since 2002, presiding over a period of rapid economic expansion that also saw Erdogan increase the profile of Islam in a republic long torn between Islamic roots and secular present.

    If the party can secure at least 330 seats in Turkey’s 550-seat parliament, critics say, Erdogan can rewrite the constitution and hasten the nation’s move toward authoritarian rule. A supermajority of 367 seats would allow the president to make the change without a referendum.

    “He is establishing a system of personal rule,” said Ergun Ozbudun of Istanbul Sehir University, a leading constitutional law scholar. “What he desires is nothing like the U.S. system, as he does not care for checks and balances…. It is a system which we can no longer call democratic.”

    But the president’s defenders deny any drift toward one-man, one-party rule and note that the Erdogan years have brought unprecedented prosperity to Turkey. Erdogan himself says the constitutional changes would spur growth and Turkey’s ascension as a global power.

    “Erdogan is like the conductor of an orchestra,” said Mustafa Yildiz, 64, a civil servant and supporter strolling recently outside Ankara’s Kocatepe mosque. “The presidential system will create harmony in Turkish politics.”

    Erdogan has bristled during mass rallies, assailing opposition movements as part of “the Armenian lobby, homosexuals … representatives of sedition.” He has repeatedly rejected allegations that Ottoman-era Turkey committed a genocide against the nation’s Armenian minority a century ago.
    cComments

    Orientals are different. An autocrat with quirks and bad manners is frequently perceived as the projection of one’s own strength, which actually doesn’t exist. More prosperity causes more secularization, which could allow Turkey to move from an oligarchy (CHP) via an autocracy (AKP)…
    jgttgns
    at 10:07 PM June 05, 2015

    Add a comment See all comments
    2

    Erdogan’s bellicose campaign rhetoric has outraged opposition leaders, who note that the constitution requires the president be nonpartisan and above party politics. Erdogan stepped down last year as party leader to run for president, receiving 52% of the vote. But he has hardly remained above the partisan fray.

    “Erdogan is not a president who could stay passive,” noted Huseyin Bagci, head of International Relations at Middle East Technical University in Ankara. “The problem for him is the constitution is not ‘his’ constitution.”

    Intimidation of critical journalists, now commonplace under Erdogan, has increased.

    Most recently, Erdogan demanded a life sentence for the editor of the daily newspaper Cumhuriyet, Can Dundar, for publishing images of a shipment of heavy weapons to Syrian Islamist rebels on trucks belonging to the Erdogan-controlled National Intelligence Organization, or MiT, in January 2014. The weapons were hidden below medical supplies, the newspaper reported.

    Erdogan’s foreign policy, particularly support for Syrian rebels, is deeply unpopular among many Turks. Turkey’s more-than-500-mile border with Syria has functioned as a rebel resupply and logistics zone.

    In this election, Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu, an Erdogan loyalist, was supposed to be the public face of the ruling party. Posters of the bespectacled Davutoglu are everywhere. But he lacks Erdogan’s charisma, so the president has hit the campaign trail with gusto, counting on his cult of personality to bring in votes.

    The two men regularly attend “opening ceremonies” together, where they appeal to the grandiose ambitions of their conservative Sunni Muslim support base.

    “By God’s will, Jerusalem belongs to the Kurds, the Turks, the Arabs and to all Muslims,” Davutolgu reportedly said during the recent inauguration of a new airport in southeastern Turkey.

    But Erdogan’s march toward a more powerful presidency could be thwarted if the HDP manages to capture more than 10% of the vote, the threshold needed to enter the parliament. That would give the group a substantial bloc.

    The left-wing party, founded in 2012, has run an upbeat campaign. Half of the HDP’s candidates are women, and religious figures and gay candidates are also in the ballots.

    “I like their speeches, that they don’t discriminate against anyone,” said 40-year-old Emine Tunc, sitting in a billiard hall in the predominantly Kurdish Istanbul neighborhood of Tarlabasi, speaking of the HDP. The ruling party “will help the Syrians, but when it comes to us, they do nothing.”

    The HDP strategy is a gamble, however. If the Kurdish-linked bloc’s vote drops below that watershed mark, the Justice and Development Party probably will absorb most of those votes and move closer to securing the large majority it needs to push through constitutional changes.

    Erdogan has pursued a peace bid with the country’s Kurds, strengthening Kurdish rights after decades of insurgency that cost of tens of thousands of lives.

    However, as Islamic State militants last year laid siege to the ethnic Kurdish city of Kobani, Erdogan refused to support the defenders of the Syrian border city. The policy alienated the nation’s Kurdish minority and sparked riots.

    Appealing to more religiously austere Kurdish voters, Erdogan brandishes Kurdish-language Korans at rallies in an attempt to arrest resurgent Kurdish nationalism.

    “I hope my conservative Kurdish brothers can realize Erdogan is just using religion as a tool to get more power,” said Sedat Ocal, a 29-year-old Kurdish man who hawks cheap jeans from a shop in Eminonu, a suburb on the fringes of Istanbul’s iconic Bosporus Strait.

    Yet to his supporters, Erdogan can do little wrong.

    Standing in his spice store in Istanbul’s conservative Fatih district’s Egyptian market — a ruling party stronghold — Savas Cinar, his beard fashioned in the style favored by Erdogan’s pious supporters, rattles off a list of the party’s achievements, including giant construction projects and the rescinding of a government ban on women wearing Muslim head scarves at universities and government offices.

    “Before Erdogan, we Muslims had no life,” Cinar said. “Soldiers used to come to our Koran recitals and harass us. Now we are a global power.”

    Special correspondent Johnson reported from Istanbul and Times staff writer McDonnell from Beirut.

    Twitter: @mcdneville

     

  • Emperor sans clothes: Turkish election strips Erdogan of former glory

    Emperor sans clothes: Turkish election strips Erdogan of former glory

    Turkey elections

    By Laura King contact the reporter

    Turkey Europe Elections Recep Tayyip Erdogan Twitter, Inc. European Union London School of Economics

    Stunning election loss in Turkey is a slap in the face from voters for once-revered Erdogan
    After an election setback, Turkey’s ruling party is seeking a coalition government — with little success

     

    It’s difficult to pinpoint just when the leader once nicknamed “The Sultan” became a figure more akin to the emperor who had no clothes.

    For more than a dozen years, Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s gilded career had taken him from one electoral triumph to the next, heaping spoils and glory not only on the Islamist-rooted political party he co-founded but on the 61-year-old leader himself.

    All that changed Sunday, when voters delivered the electoral equivalent of a stinging slap in the face to the man once considered the most popular politician in the country’s modern history.

    The voting results deprived Erdogan’s Justice and Development Party, or AKP, of the single-party power it had enjoyed since 2002, and derailed his personal vision of transforming the largely ceremonial post of president, which he assumed in August, into an overarching seat of power.

     

    The ballot-box verdict could be read as an affirmation of what had long been buzzed about in Turkey’s ancient bazaars and spanking-new skyscrapers: that Ergodan, once seen as a savior, was in danger of becoming a national liability.

    Wearied by years of harsh crackdowns and grandiose gestures on Erdogan’s part, many Turks came to view him as a leader who burned bridges rather than building them. The aura of fear and reverence dissolved into something unfamiliar and far more subversive: laughter.

    It wasn’t always like that. Erdogan came of political age as an outsider who mounted courageous challenges to Turkey’s often-sinister military-dominated power elite. Jailed for reciting a poem, he dabbled in prison verse. In his early years in power, with his star on the rise, he was a darling of the West, hailed as the moderate face of political Islam.
    lRelated
    Voters in Turkey deal stunning setback to president’s party

    Europe
    Voters in Turkey deal stunning setback to president’s party

    See all related
    8

    He empowered an entrepreneurial class of pious Muslims who became an engine of Turkey’s eye-catching economic growth. In a diverse and complex society struggling to find a foothold in the modern world, Erdogan preached inclusiveness and backed up his words with actions.

    As prime minister, he risked considerable political capital to reach out to the minority Kurds and worked to halt a bloody civil conflict of decades’ standing. For a time, he worked assiduously to forge friendly relations with neighbors — even with Israel, reviled throughout the Muslim world.

    On the misty shores of the Bosporus, Turks on Monday offered differing day-after assessments of when and how it went wrong for Erdogan. Some traced the trajectory to the violent crackdown on demonstrations that sprang up in 2013 in Istanbul’s Gezi Park — initially a relatively narrow green-minded protest movement that turned into a broader expression of popular discontent.

    “The Gezi movement was important, beginning a discourse of change,” said Esra Ozyurek, a scholar of contemporary Turkey at the London School of Economics. As arrests and beatings mounted, Erdogan, who had entered politics as a champion of the oppressed, began to be seen as an oppressor.

    Hard on the heels of the Gezi protests came a corruption scandal that spurred Erdogan, then still prime minister, to purge hundreds of supporters of a rival movement led by a onetime ally, exiled cleric Fethullah Gulen, from the police, judiciary and media.

    At the same time, it escaped the notice of few that Erdogan appeared bent on supplanting the secular-democratic legacy of Turkey’s founding leader, Mustafa Kemal Ataturk. Seeking to symbolically undo one of Ataturk’s signature feats, a rendering of Turkish in the Western alphabet, Erdogan last year vowed to impose compulsory lessons in Arabic-alphabet Ottoman script.
    cComments

    Regardless, yesterday was a great win for Kemalism and the secular nature of Turkey’s government. It should be celebrated, not feared and there is the possibility albeit remote at this point that the three opposition parties could form their own coalition if Erdogen doesn’t get back…
    affableman
    at 9:07 AM June 08, 2015

    Add a comment See all comments
    2

    Bellicose and retrograde statements became the new norm. A women’s job, Erdogan told a female audience, is motherhood. Twitter, he declared, was “evil.” To the European Union, when it urged greater media freedom, he replied: “Mind your own business.” For the New York Times, which recently wrote a sharply worded editorial about Turkey losing its way, he offered this riposte: “Know your place.”

    Virulent attacks on journalists and social media became routine as the list of matters over which the president was ridiculed grew longer. There was the opulent 1,150-room presidential palace — complete with Ottoman-era touches such as a team of food testers to guard against poisoning — whose $615-million cost Erdogan justified just before the election by saying that his previous residence had suffered from an infestation of cockroaches.

    There was the movie-set presidential guard, done up in Turkic warrior costumes from centuries past, and the teenage boy dragged from his classroom to account for a Facebook post. A politician once known for skillful, even spellbinding rhetoric fell back on conspiratorial rants, with the final days of the campaign consumed by his dark mutterings about the seditious tendencies of Armenians and homosexuals.

    Such rhetoric went down well with the president’s conservative base. But the unhappy state of Turkey’s affairs of state was memorably encapsulated last month by author Stephen Kinzer, a long-respected observer of the country.

    “Once seen as a skilled modernizer, he now sits in a 1,000-room palace denouncing the European Union, decreeing the arrest of journalists, and ranting against short skirts and birth control,” Kinzer wrote of Erdogan in a column in the Boston Globe. Retribution was swift: The author said a high civic honor that was to be bestowed on him by a Turkish city was swiftly rescinded.

    Erdogan, who was ubiquitous during the campaign — in defiance of a constitutional role that is supposed to keep the president aloof from politics — remained silent for a full 18 hours after it first became clear that the AKP’s hopes for a parliamentary majority had gone unrealized. Even then, his first public response was in the form of a written statement, not a personal appearance.

    The election results, he said, “do not give the opportunity to any party to form a single-party government” — implicitly inviting the AKP’s rivals to consider forming a coalition.

    So far, none has expressed an interest in partnering with the AKP. If a new government cannot be assembled within 45 days, Turkey will likely go to new elections. Shock waves from Sunday’s election results, meanwhile, rattled Turkey’s financial markets Monday, with the stock market sliding and the lira touching new lows.

    The party’s titular head, Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu, reminded the public that the AKP was still the largest bloc in parliament, after winning about 41% of the vote. “It is the winner; it finished first in these elections,” he said.

    Some analysts pointed out that it is easy to forget that Erdogan skillfully harnessed powerful political impulses that remain widely felt in Turkey — and could do so again.

    “He is still president for the next four years, and he has considerable authorities, and has by all accounts exploited every one of them,” said Francis J. Ricciardone, a former U.S. ambassador to Turkey who is now vice president and director of the Atlantic Council think tank. “He is clearly going to be influential.”

    Twitter: @laurakingLAT

  • The Turkish President’s Palace Is Ruled ‘Illegal’

    The Turkish President’s Palace Is Ruled ‘Illegal’

    White Palaceby Louise Turner
    Turkeys top administrative court has declared the construction of a $615-million, 1,150-room palace for the Turkish President, as illegal.Press TV report:

    Ankara’s Fifth Administrative Court overturned a previous ruling that permitted an exception to build “White Palace” on protected land, UPI reported on Wednesday. Erdogan moved into the luxurious residence last year.

    The palace was built in an area of 300,000 square meters in an environmentally protected nature preserve called the Ataturk Forest Farm.

    According to Turkey’s Chamber of Architects, following the overturning the construction of the palace is now deemed illegal.

    “The construction plans, the protection board’s decisions, and the construction licenses, which allowed the illegal construction are completely unlawful at the moment after this verdict,” said a Chamber of Architects statement.

    During the construction of the palace various legal petitions were circulated, all of which noted that the palace was being built on protected ground.

    A cultural center, another presidential residence, and some other buildings are also slated for construction at the site but it is still unclear if the recent court ruling will affect the additional construction as the president’s office has denied all claims on the ruling via a statement released on Wednesday.

    According to the Turkish daily Today’s Zaman, a Turkish court ordered last year that the construction of the palace be halted, but then-Prime Minister Erdogan challenged the court decision, saying, “If they have the power, let them destroy it.”

    yournewswire.com

  • An Imam, a Mercedes and Erdogan’s Election Gambit

    An Imam, a Mercedes and Erdogan’s Election Gambit

    stratfor

    May 28, 2015 | 00:20 GMT

    A story involving an imam, the pope and a Mercedes-Benz may sound like the start of a bad joke, but this is a true story that reveals a great deal about Turkey’s political path with just 10 days to go before elections.

    The tale began around six months ago, when Turkish newspaper Hurriyet uncovered a budget that revealed state funds were being used to buy the head of Turkey’s Presidency of Religious Affairs an S500 Mercedes-Benz worth $385,000. The story didn’t gather steam until early May, in the thick of Turkey’s election season, when Turkey’s opposition parties took turns pouncing on President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s government for its exorbitant spending habits. The would-be owner of the flashy car, Mehmet Gormez, opted to escape the controversy by sheepishly declaring that he would return the car and “set an example.”

    But Erdogan saw an opportunity of his own in making Gormez an example. Last Thursday, Erdogan swept away the criticism and declared that his office will provide the cleric with an armored Mercedes. And if that was not enough fuel to add to the fire, Erdogan said in a television interview on May 26 that he would give Gormez a private jet. After all, the president coyly explained, the pope “has a private jet, private cars and armored vehicles. That’s the situation at the Vatican, and our religious leader will take scheduled flights?”
    What is a Geopolitical Diary? George Friedman Explains.
    Never mind that the Vatican spent most of Wednesday painstakingly calling up news agencies to clarify the populist credentials of Pope Francis, who apparently has no problem flying commercial and putters around Vatican City in a Ford Focus. What matters here is the message that Erdogan is broadcasting — not to bewilder foreign media and not to rile up his opposition, but to solidify support within his core constituency.

    Remember what Erdogan represents: He is the leader of a more pious class whose roots are mostly in Anatolia. It is a class that has spent most of Turkey’s history sidelined from power while a secular, military-backed elite dominated the country’s institutions and political economy from their stronghold around the Sea of Marmara. Erdogan’s Justice and Development Party and its predecessors neutralized the political clout of the military, raising a new business class and stacking institutions — including ministries, courts, newspaper agencies and schools — with allies that looked first and foremost to Erdogan as their patron. Without Erdogan in power, the perks of being a member of Erdogan’s patronage network would be lost. To these constituents, Erdogan’s message is quite clear: If you are my ally, you will be taken care of.

    The message also goes beyond Erdogan’s flamboyant tactics in trying to preserve a cult of personality around his presidency. The victim of this controversy, the Presidency of Religious Affairs, has an important history. The Presidency, or “Diyanet,” was established in the early years of the republic in 1928. At the time, Turkey’s founder, Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, was crafting a strategy to manage religion in the new state. In carving a state out of a multi-ethnic and multi-religious empire, Ataturk understood that religion had to play some role in distinguishing Turkish citizens from non-Muslims. But Ataturk also saw the dangers of religion drawing the state back toward pan-Islamic ambitions, risking another collapse of the state should those far-flung ambitions once again overwhelm the center.

    Ataturk thus tried to strike a balance. He took the radical steps of banning the caliphate, closing down religious schools and removing a clause from the constitution saying that “Islam is the religion of the republic.” At the same time, he created the Presidency of Religious Affairs to manage religion on the state’s terms. Rather than separate mosque and state, Ataturk sought to institutionalize a state-run version of Islam.

    For the last dozen years, Erdogan has been trying to rewrite Ataturk’s script for the republic. Religion would no longer be tamed by the state; it would define the state once again. This position has alienated half of the country, but has at the same time given hope to another half who deeply identify with their religion and see Turkey as the deserved leader and model of the Islamic world.

    The June 7 election will tell us just how wide this fissure in Turkey’s identity politics is. What may seem like foolish political tactics to many could well translate into an astute political strategy by a man who has managed to win the hearts and minds of millions of Turks.

    At the same time, Erdogan is undoubtedly taking a risk. He came into power as the savior for the Anatolian masses, liberating the country from what he characterized as an obsolete and corrupted elite. Turkey’s pugnacious president wants his followers to know that any ally of Erdogan will be protected and live the good life. But the economy is on shaky ground, the party’s pan-Islamic foreign policy is exposing the country’s vulnerabilities, and Erdogan’s populist credentials are being questioned in light of his unapologetically lavish spending. We see the logic. We also see the risk. At least for Erdogan, this is a gamble worth taking.

  • Turkey, Greece bless restart of Cyprus talks

    Turkey, Greece bless restart of Cyprus talks

    Turkey and Greece have expressed hope over soon-to-begin reunification talks in Cyprus, welcoming a decision by both parties to restart negotiations after pro-solution Mustafa Akıncı’s election as the new Turkish Cypriot president.

    “The resumption of negotiations is an important development. We have the will for a settlement in Cyprus. I would like to express my belief that we will reach a permanent solution this year, if the Greek Cypriots and Turkey and Greece have expressed hope over soon-to-begin reunification talks in Cyprus, welcoming a decision by both parties to restart negotiations after pro-solution Mustafa Akıncı’s election as the new Turkish Cypriot president.

    “Let’s not miss this opportunity,” he added, calling for more frequent and intensified negotiations.
    The visiting Greek minister also said the current situation introduced a fresh opportunity for a permanent solution to the Cyprus question.“Cyprus should be an independent state. There should be a Cyprus that has very good relationships with all countries, and that has no need of guarantor countries,” Kotzias said.

    Urging that no country should impose a solution or put pressure on the two parties, Kotzias praised the newly elected Turkish Cypriot leader. “Akıncı is a figure representing the Cypriot soul. Resolving the Cyprus problem will help sort out so many other problems in the region,” he added.

    The leaders of divided Cyprus agreed on May 11 to restart peace talks on May 15, a U.N. envoy has said, offering fresh hope for healing one of Europe’s most enduring frozen conflicts.

     
    Mustafa Akinci, Espen Barth Eide, Nicos Anastasiades
    Espen Barth Eide was speaking to media after a meeting between Greek Cypriot leader Nicos Anastasiades and Turkish Cypriot leader Akıncı. It was their first encounter since Akıncı swept to victory in a Turkish Cypriot election on April 26.“They agreed it was important to use the momentum created and opportunity to move forward without delay,” Eide told journalists outside a landmark hotel straddling a “buffer zone” that has split the capital Nicosia for decades.

    Once catering to Hollywood royalty, the Ledra Palace Hotel is now a shabby shadow of its former self, and is used as living quarters for UN forces.

    Eide said May 11 that the two leaders had agreed to meet on May 15 to have a “general exchange of views” and discuss the modalities and structure of negotiations.

    Image result for Espen Barth Eide“This is a unique opportunity, an opportunity to be grasped,” said Eide, a former Norwegian foreign minister.Both sides officially agree in principle that the island should be united under a two-state federal umbrella, but past negotiations have foundered on issues such as the powers of a central government and the residency and property rights of thousands of internally displaced people.

    The last major peace push collapsed in 2004, when Greek Cypriots rejected a reunification blueprint accepted by the Turkish Cypriots.

    In Ankara, Kotzias reiterated Greece’s support of Turkey’s membership in the European Union, but underscored that Athens favored seeing Turkey accept and implement all EU rules.

    “We also want to see the EU acknowledging the richness of Turkey and the Turkish people. We want the EU to see and embrace Turkey’s political views. I am of the opinion that the positive climate that will be nourished by supporting the resolutions in Cyprus and in the Aegean will constitute an inspiration for Turkish-Greek ties and for the entire region,” he said.

    blogcu
    Both Kotzias and Turkish Foreign Minister Çavuşoğlu also announced a fresh agreement on a package of confidence-building measures to avoid unwanted clashes that could increase tension in the Aegean Sea, in a move to launch a new era in bilateral ties.“We have agreed on a number of confidence-building measures to prevent the occurrence of unwanted accidents as a result of military activities in the Aegean,” Çavuşoğlu told reporters.

    Kotzias said the agreement included nine technical measures aimed at reducing the tension in the Aegean Sea and resolving existing problems between the two countries. The ministers did not provide details about the measures that they will take in the Aegean.

    “Our main objective is to make the Turkish and Greek peoples come closer together, to improve relations, and to turn the Aegean into a sea of friendship … We are continuing our efforts to resolve existing problems between the two countries through dialogue. We will resume exploratory talks,” Çavuşoğlu said.

    The decade-old exploratory talks have aimed to find a negotiated solution to the existing problems over the Aegean Sea, including defining the continental shelf, territorial waters and airspace.

    Kotzias underlined that Turkey and Greece stood as “elements of stability” in the region, with a joint demand to resolve the problems stemming from the Aegean Sea.

    Tsipras-Davutoğlu in accord  

    The Greek foreign minister also had separate meetings with President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu as part of his visit to Turkey.

    “My impression is that Davutoğlu and [Greek Prime Minister Alexis] Tsipras are on the same wavelength. Both are young and are reading the international environment well. Tsipras will come to Turkey with pleasure. I am not a member of any political party in Greece but I think both countries are lucky to have such prime ministers,” Kotzias said.

    He also added that officials from two countries’ interior and justice ministries would soon come together to discuss illegal human trafficking, an issue of concern for both sides.

    May/12/2015

    have a similar will,” Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu said during a joint press meeting with his Greek counterpart Nikos Kotzias in Ankara on May 12.

    “Let’s not miss this opportunity,” he added, calling for more frequent and intensified negotiations.
    The visiting Greek minister also said the current situation introduced a fresh opportunity for a permanent solution to the Cyprus question.

    “Cyprus should be an independent state. There should be a Cyprus that has very good relationships with all countries, and that has no need of guarantor countries,” Kotzias said.

    Urging that no country should impose a solution or put pressure on the two parties, Kotzias praised the newly elected Turkish Cypriot leader. “Akıncı is a figure representing the Cypriot soul. Resolving the Cyprus problem will help sort out so many other problems in the region,” he added.

    The leaders of divided Cyprus agreed on May 11 to restart peace talks on May 15, a U.N. envoy has said, offering fresh hope for healing one of Europe’s most enduring frozen conflicts.

    Espen Barth Eide was speaking to media after a meeting between Greek Cypriot leader Nicos Anastasiades and Turkish Cypriot leader Akıncı. It was their first encounter since Akıncı swept to victory in a Turkish Cypriot election on April 26.

    “They agreed it was important to use the momentum created and opportunity to move forward without delay,” Eide told journalists outside a landmark hotel straddling a “buffer zone” that has split the capital Nicosia for decades.

    Once catering to Hollywood royalty, the Ledra Palace Hotel is now a shabby shadow of its former self, and is used as living quarters for British forces.

    Eide said May 11 that the two leaders had agreed to meet on May 15 to have a “general exchange of views” and discuss the modalities and structure of negotiations.

    “This is a unique opportunity, an opportunity to be grasped,” said Eide, a former Norwegian foreign minister.

    Both sides officially agree in principle that the island should be united under a two-state federal umbrella, but past negotiations have foundered on issues such as the powers of a central government and the residency and property rights of thousands of internally displaced people.

    The last major peace push collapsed in 2004, when Greek Cypriots rejected a reunification blueprint accepted by the Turkish Cypriots.

    In Ankara, Kotzias reiterated Greece’s support of Turkey’s membership in the European Union, but underscored that Athens favored seeing Turkey accept and implement all EU rules.

    “We also want to see the EU acknowledging the richness of Turkey and the Turkish people. We want the EU to see and embrace Turkey’s political views. I am of the opinion that the positive climate that will be nourished by supporting the resolutions in Cyprus and in the Aegean will constitute an inspiration for Turkish-Greek ties and for the entire region,” he said.

    Both Kotzias and Turkish Foreign Minister Çavuşoğlu also announced a fresh agreement on a package of confidence-building measures to avoid unwanted clashes that could increase tension in the Aegean Sea, in a move to launch a new era in bilateral ties.

    “We have agreed on a number of confidence-building measures to prevent the occurrence of unwanted accidents as a result of military activities in the Aegean,” Çavuşoğlu told reporters.

    Kotzias said the agreement included nine technical measures aimed at reducing the tension in the Aegean Sea and resolving existing problems between the two countries. The ministers did not provide details about the measures that they will take in the Aegean.

    “Our main objective is to make the Turkish and Greek peoples come closer together, to improve relations, and to turn the Aegean into a sea of friendship … We are continuing our efforts to resolve existing problems between the two countries through dialogue. We will resume exploratory talks,” Çavuşoğlu said.

    The decade-old exploratory talks have aimed to find a negotiated solution to the existing problems over the Aegean Sea, including defining the continental shelf, territorial waters and airspace.

    Kotzias underlined that Turkey and Greece stood as “elements of stability” in the region, with a joint demand to resolve the problems stemming from the Aegean Sea.

    Tsipras-Davutoğlu in accord  

    The Greek foreign minister also had separate meetings with President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu as part of his visit to Turkey.

    “My impression is that Davutoğlu and [Greek Prime Minister Alexis] Tsipras are on the same wavelength. Both are young and are reading the international environment well. Tsipras will come to Turkey with pleasure. I am not a member of any political party in Greece but I think both countries are lucky to have such prime ministers,” Kotzias said.

    He also added that officials from two countries’ interior and justice ministries would soon come together to discuss illegal human trafficking, an issue of concern for both sides.

    May/12/2015

  • Seeking a magician in Cyprus

    Seeking a magician in Cyprus

    TRNC President KINCI with Turkish President Erdogan

    On his maiden trip abroad, newly elected Turkish Cypriot leader Mustafa Akıncı and his Turkish counterpart and host Recep Tayyip Erdogan  left behind the “motherland” and “kinderland” squabble and declared jointly it was now time to concentrate on fast-tracking the Cyprus talks and finding a resolution in 2015. The visit demonstrated the existence, in both Turkey and the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC), of the much-needed political will for a negotiated resolution on the island. Yet, it also underlined that two are needed to tango, and the Greek Cypriot side should also develop the political will and commit itself to a serious, settlement-oriented approach for the success of the talks slated to resume soon.

    Akıncı’s visit also helped redefine the so-called “red lines,” even though lately there have been worries that Turkey’s and the Turkish Cypriots’ priorities have begun to differ. Even though Erdoğan and Akıncı appeared to have left behind their “mother” and “baby” row for now, and the Turkish president was rather careful to make his guest feel as comfortable as possible, he was to the point in stressing Turkey’s patience has run out with inconclusive rounds of Cyprus talks. Naturally, he was not complaining about Turkish Cypriot negotiators, but rather about the lack of interest for a Cyprus deal from the Greek Cypriot side. Similarly, Akıncı also underlined that Cyprus talks must have a timetable, cannot continue forever and his people cannot be left in limbo.

    TRNC President AKINCI with UN envoy Eide
    Thus, during the talks in Anakra, it was agreed that a settlement on Cyprus is long overdue and the target of the talks between the Turkish and Cypriot sides on Cyprus, slated to resume soon, cannot continue open-ended. Will that mean at the “social event” with Akıncı and  Greek counterpart Nikos Anastasiades as guests of a dinner hosted by the U.N. secretary-general’s Special Cyprus Envoy Espen Barth Eide that the Turkish Cypriot leader will press for a tight timetable? Probably not, but he is expected to press for an undeclared understanding on the issue. Indeed, both Erdoğan and Akıncı did not spare their words. They said if the  GreekCypriots really wanted it, a deal was already discernible. They said that not only might a deal be reached within the next seven months, but simultaneous referenda on a new resolution might also be held before the end of the year.

    Such a target appears to be even more than optimism for now, as Greek Cypriots do not appear willing at all to compromise and engage in power sharing or become partners with Turkish Cypriots in governance and sovereignty of the eastern Mediterranean island. That was why, perhaps, Akıncı felt the need to stress, “I am not a magician. I will work for a deal by the end of this year. But without Greeks committing themselves as well, no success is possible.”

    These talks, which have been intermittently continuing since the first meeting in 1968 in Lebanon, did not leave any stone unturned. All tiny details of the problem are discussed to such an extent that they are known even by the man on the street. There is of course no need to reinvent the wheel now. Thus, Erdoğan and Akıncı agreed to flatly reject any attempt to resume the process right from scratch once again. Obviously all the convergences agreed to in the last many years of talks must constitute a basis for talks together with the Feb. 11, 2014, document between Anastasiades and former Turkish Cypriot president Derviş Eroğlu.

    One serious concern was Akıncı’s pre-election promise to act on the thorny Varosha issue. Varosha, a once sprawling tourist resort suburb of Famagusta, has been a ghost city since the 1974 Turkish intervention and many governments of the past implied it would be given back to Greek Cypriots as part of a comprehensive peace deal. Varosha has been popping up in various forms over the past decades as part of confidence building measures. Now Ankara and Akıncı have established a new understanding: Varosha is in the cards, but its final status depends on an overall comprehensive resolution of the Cyprus problem. Yet, in exchange for the opening of the Famagusta Port and Ercan  Airport to international traffic, the resettlement of Varosha by its former residents under an interim formula might be considered. This of course constitutes a radical change in Akıncı’s Varosha rhetoric from the election period.

    Another “softening down” in Akıncı’s election statements was regarding the hydrocarbon issue. While he was still stressing that hydrocarbon riches must serve as a catalyst of a settlement, he agreed with Ankara’s position that unilateral Greek Cypriot hydrocarbon moves would be unacceptable and any such riches must serve both peoples of the island.

    Akıncı was no magician. He was open in stressing that an appealing Greek Cypriot leadership should commit itself as well. Yet, he got Ankara’s firm reassertion that whatever deal Turkish Cypriots might make with Greek Cypriots, Ankara would support it.

    May/08/2015

    yusuf.kanli@hurriyet.com.tr