Tag: Recep Tayyip Erdogan

12th president of Turkey

  • Atatürk’s mother’s name rejected by AKP for new Turkish university

    Atatürk’s mother’s name rejected by AKP for new Turkish university

    Font Size: Larger|Smaller

    Friday, July 16, 2010Z
    ANKARA – Radikal

    Deputies from Turkey’s ruling party have voted down a proposal to name a new university in İzmir after Zübeyde Hanım, mother of the founder of the Turkish Republic, Mustafa Kemal Atatürk.

    During a debate Tuesday evening in Parliament, the name “Zübeyde Hanım” was proposed for one of the eight new universities around the country to be established under a recent draft law.

    Parliament convened to debate the new draft and decided that the university would be named “Katip Çelebi” instead.

    During the debate Tuesday before the draft passed, Bülent Baratalı and seven deputies of the Republican People’s Party, or CHP, proposed a resolution for the naming of the new university in İzmir “Zübeyde Hanım University.”

    Education Minister Nimet Çubukçu, however, expressed her disagreement with the CHP proposal.

    CHP deputy Baratalı pointed out that İzmir currently has seven universities and the new university in question was initially named “Turgut Reis,” but this name was later changed to “Katip Çelebi” by Parliament’s Planning and Budgeting Commission.

    “For the first time, a university in Turkey would have been named after a woman. At the time the founder of the nation, Gazi Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, was installed as president, he bore the title of parliamentary deputy – from İzmir,” Baratalı said. “His wife was from İzmir and he laid his mother to rest in İzmir – her grave is in [the local district of] Karşıyaka. For that reason, we, the people of İzmir, owe this homage to the founder of our nation.”

    The Justice and Development Party, or AKP, members, however, rejected the resolution proposed by the CHP deputy, and the new university will be named after Çelebi, an Ottoman scientist who lived between 1608 and 1656.

    The other universities established under the new law are Yıldırım Beyazıt University in Ankara, Bursa Technical University, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Konya University, Erzurum Technical University, Kayseri Abdullah Gül University and the International University of Antalya.

  • Who is Recep Tayyip Erdogan and why he seeks suing Israel ?

    Who is Recep Tayyip Erdogan and why he seeks suing Israel ?


    (Translated from Spanish by Google)

    by David Mandel

    To answer the title question, we must first mention of Mustafa Kemal, better known as Ataturk (“Father of the Turks”), the general founder of the Republic of Turkey and its first president. Despite its short life (he died in 1938 at age 57 years) Ataturk is considered one of the great men of history. He freed his country in a war against the Allies who had defeated the Ottoman Empire. By wise political, economic, religious and social turned Turkey into a modern, secular and democratic. He abolished the caliphate, forced the Turks to adopt modern European clothing (including hats instead of fez). He changed the alphabet, which had been based in Arabic, an alphabet based on Latin letters. Transferred the capital from Istanbul to Ankara. He abolished the sect of dervishes and other extremist Islamic sects. He abolished Islamic courts of justice and adopted a penal code based on the Italian code. Established education for women, and gave them civil and political equality, before they did many European states. He founded the Museum of Art and Sculpture (arts that had been prohibited by Islam during the Ottoman Empire). He established the Academy of the Turkish language and Turkish Historical Society. He reorganized and modernized the University of Istanbul, and founded the University of Ankara. Promoted the industrialization of the country.

    His legacy was supported mainly by the army, which, on more than one occasion, overthrew governments that did not follow the pattern inherited from Ataturk.
    The current prime minister of Turkey, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, (born in 1954, ruling from March 2003), is a devout Muslim who has managed to neutralize the army and, contrary to Ataturk’s policy is Islamized the country.
    In the mid 70’s Erdogan began to turn in the Islamist party, MSP, which was banned by the military coup of 1980. In 1983 he returned to political life in the party Refah Partisi, founded by former members of the MSP. His party won the municipal elections in Istanbul. Erdogan tried to introduce Islamic measures such as separate places for men and women on public transport and schools.
    In 1998, after being sentenced to prison for publicly reciting a poem by poet Islamic extremist Ziya Gokalp (“the mosques are our barracks, domes our helmets, the minarets our bayonets and the faithful our soldiers”), seeing that continue being openly fanatical Islamic not led to anything, Erdogan announced that he was in favor of a separation of religion and state.
    In 2001 he founded the Party of Justice and Development Party (AKP) which, although did not get an absolute majority, won the most votes in the parliamentary election of 2002. Since then, gradually drew closer to the positions of other Islamic states, one of whose main expression is the antagonism to Israel, a country which was allied with Turkey for decades, especially in the aspect of military (Israel Air Force trained in the airspace of Turkey).
    Their convictions to Israel by the Jewish state’s actions against Hamas, have a significant element of hypocrisy, since Turkey is embroiled in a bloody conflict with Kurdish separatists, (Turkey calls “terrorists”), and is illegally occupying the northern Cyprus.
    Erdogan, despite his violent and insulting expressions against Israel, so far has not broken diplomatic relations, possibly due to the support that Israel still has among the Turkish military.
    The concrete result of the anti-Israeli Erdogan is that hundreds of thousands of Israeli tourists visiting Turkey annually, and they do not, causing a low of 400 million dollars annually to the Turkish tourism industry.

    ¿Quién es Recep Tayyip Erdogán y por qué le busca pleito a Israel?

    por David Mandel

    Para poder contestar la pregunta del título, primero se debe mencionar a Mustafá Kemal, más conocido como Ataturk (“Padre de los turcos”), el general fundador de la república de Turquía, y su primer presidente. A pesar de su corta vida, (murió en 1938, a los 57 años de edad) Ataturk es considerado uno de los más grandes hombres de la historia. Liberó a su país en una guerra contra los aliados que habían derrotado al imperio otomano. Mediante sabias reformas políticas, económicas, religiosas y sociales convirtió a Turquía en un país moderno, secular y democrático. Abolió el califato, obligó a los turcos a adoptar la vestimenta europea moderna, (incluyendo sombreros en vez de fez). Cambió el alfabeto, que había estado basado en el árabe, a un alfabeto basado en letras latinas. Transfirió la capital de Estambul a Ankara. Abolió la secta de los derviches y otras sectas islámicas extremistas. Abolió las cortes islámicas de justicia y adoptó un código penal basado en el código italiano. Estableció la educación para las mujeres, y les dio igualdad civil y política, antes de que lo hicieran muchos estados europeos. Fundó el Museo de Arte y Escultura (artes que habían sido prohibidas por el Islam durante el imperio otomano). Estableció la academia de la lengua turca y la Sociedad Histórica turca. Reorganizó y modernizó la Universidad de Estambul, y fundó la Universidad de Ankara. Promovió la industrialización del país.

    Su legado fue defendido principalmente por el ejército, que, en más de una ocasión, depuso a los gobiernos que no seguían las pautas heredadas de Ataturk.
    El actual primer ministro de Turquía, Recep Tayyip Erdogán, (nacido en 1954, gobierna desde marzo del 2003), es un islámico devoto que ha logrado neutralizar al ejército y ―en contra de la política de Ataturk― está islamizando el país.
    A mediados de la década de los 70 Erdogán empezó a activar en el partido islamista, MSP, que fue prohibido por el golpe militar de 1980. En 1983 retornó a la vida política en el partido Refah Partisi, fundado por ex miembros del MSP. Su partido ganó las elecciones municipales de Estambul. Erdogán trató de introducir medidas islámicas, tales como lugares separados para hombres y mujeres en el transporte público y en las escuelas.
    En 1998, después de ser condenado a prisión, por recitar públicamente un poema islámico extremista del poeta Ziya Gokalp, (“las mezquitas son nuestros cuarteles, las cúpulas nuestros cascos, los minaretes nuestras bayonetas y los creyentes nuestros soldados”), viendo que continuar siendo abiertamente islámico fanático no le conducía a nada, Erdogán anunció que estaba favor de una separación de la religión y del estado.
    En el año 2001 fundó el Partido de la Justicia y el Desarrollo (AKP) que, aunque no consiguió mayoría absoluta, logró la mayor cantidad de votos en la elección parlamentaria del 2002. Desde esa fecha, gradualmente, se fue acercando a las posiciones de otros estados islámicos, una de cuyas principales expresiones es el antagonismo a Israel, país que había sido aliado de Turquía durante décadas, especialmente en el aspecto militar (la fuerza aérea de Israel entrenaba en el espacio aéreo de Turquía).
    Sus condenas a Israel, por las acciones del estado hebreo contra Hamás, tienen un apreciable elemento de hipocresía, ya que Turquía está envuelta en un sangriento conflicto con los separatistas kurdos, (Turquía los llama “terroristas”), y ocupa ilegalmente el norte de Chipre.
    Erdogán, a pesar de sus violentas e insultantes expresiones contra Israel, hasta ahora no ha roto relaciones diplomáticas, debido, posiblemente, al apoyo que Israel aún tiene entre los militares turcos.
    El resultado concreto de la política anti-israelí de Erdogán es que los cientos de miles de turistas israelíes que visitaban anualmente Turquía, ya no lo hacen, causando una baja de 400 millones de dólares anuales a la industria turística turca.

    Fuente: Mi Enfoque

  • The AKP’s Hamas Policy: “Us vs. Them”

    The AKP’s Hamas Policy: “Us vs. Them”

    The AKP’s Hamas Policy: “Us vs. Them”
    By Soner Cagaptay
    Hurriyet Daily News
    July 5, 2010

    At home, the Justice and Development Party, or AKP, has promoted the Islamist mindset of “us Muslims” in conflict with “the bad others” through the media and also by spreading Hamas’ views throughout Turkey, whether through official Hamas visits to Turkey or through AKP-supported conferences and fundraisers.

    Recent changes in media ownership in Turkey under the AKP are closely related to the spread of anti-Western sentiments in the country. Turkey is a country with free media. Media independence in Turkey, however, is increasingly under threat.

    The Turkish media remains free (in that it is not illegal to produce journalism), but the AKP is trying to curb media freedoms by transforming media ownership through legal loopholes. Such was the case in December 2005 when the AKP took over the Sabah-ATV conglomerate, which represents around 20% of the Turkish media market, selling this conglomerate to a media company of which Turkish Prime minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s son-in-law Berat Albayrak is the CEO.

    The AKP has also brought a $3.2 billion tax fine against Dogan Yayin, a conglomerate that owns around 50 percent of the Turkish media. This excessive fine exceeds Dogan’s total net worth — is political, because Dogan’s news outlets promote secular, liberal and nationalist views that often criticize of the AKP.

    The transformation of the Turkish media is not an esoteric issue, for it affects the future of Turkish democracy and also has a bearing on Turkish views of the world.

    Where there is no independent media — as in Russia — there is simply no viable opposition to government. Whenever Turkey goes through a political spasm, analysts warn of the collapse of Turkey’s democracy. Despite this, Turkey has survived numerous crises in the past thanks to the balancing power of its fourth pillar.

    As Turkish media becomes less free, there is a higher likelihood that it will become a tool for the government with which to shape an anti-Western public opinion. What is bad for secular liberal western Turks is bad for the West. Turkey’s free media needs to remain free because if it is all either state-owned or owned by pro-AKP businesses, anti-Western and anti-Israeli viewpoints will spread through the media, which we have been witnessing since 2002.

    A recent show on Turkey’s publicly-funded Turkish Radio Television, or TRT, network is a perfect example. The debut of the series, entitled “Ayrilik” (Separation), came on the heels of Turkey’s cancellation of Israeli participation in the Anatolian Eagle exercises. TRT, whose head is appointed by the AKP, and which is entirely funded by Turkish taxpayer money, ran “Ayrilik,” a show with an anti-Israeli stance, including one which depicts an imagined situation in the Palestinian territories where a newborn baby is intentionally killed by Israeli soldiers.

    What do 18-year-old Turks think of Israel now? They hate it, and they will do so because of images depicted in shows like “Ayrilik.” These are the images they have been seeing for the last seven years and this is what they’ll continue seeing. A Turk who has come of age under the AKP is now more likely than not to hate Israel and the West after seven years of such propaganda. Unlike Turks now in their forties or older who came of political age in a different Turkey, younger Turks in their twenties and thirties have more radical and negative views of the West as a result of what they see in government-controlled media as well as media owned by pro-government businesses.

    Through Conferences
    While government-controlled media promotes an evil image of the Israelis, international Hamas conferences in Turkey build legitimacy for Hamas and other extensions of the International Muslim Brotherhood movement. Before the AKP came to power, Turkey had never hosted a Hamas conference. Now, such conferences render the Hamas and Muslim Brotherhood agenda more accessible to Turks, making Hamas’ violent struggle against Israel a part of daily political debate in Turkey.

    In the last three years alone, there have been seven Hamas conferences and fundraisers in Istanbul. The first one of these, held in July 2006 and attended by one of the spiritual leaders of the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood, Sheikh Yousef al-Qaradawi, was given the title “Muslims in Europe.” Qaradawi’s visit was funded by the British Foreign Office, and Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood came to talk about Muslims in Europe, exposing Turks and European Muslims to Hamas and its ideology.

    The list continues: other Hamas and Muslim Brotherhood conferences in Turkey include a November, 2007 conference called “Jerusalem Day,” co-organized by nongovernmental organization the Association of Turkish Volunteer Organizations, or TGTV, close to the AKP and Islamic Association of Muslim World Nongovernmental Organizations, or IDSB. This conference, entitled “Jerusalem Day,” called for “liberating Jerusalem through jihad from the Zionists.”

    Other conferences followed in February 2009, April 2009, May 2009, and July 2009. What is interesting is that the frequency of these conferences has been steadily increasing, with four such meetings alone held in 2009.

    Moreover, these meetings have started to espouse a violent agenda. For instance, at the February 2009 conference, Hamas members called for a jihad centered on Gaza. The April 2009 meeting was a “Masjid al-Aqsa symposium” which called to “liberate Masjid al-Aqsa” and it was organized by the Istanbul Peace Platform, or IBP, which includes a number of NGOs close to the AKP. The symposium called on all Muslims to liberate al-Aqsa through violence, if necessary, and also claimed that Israel has plans to demolish it. The “Palestine Collaboration Conference” in May 2009 called for “continued resistance to liberate Palestine.” Conference participants included former Sudanese President Mushir Sivar Ez-Zeheb, President of the International Union of Muslim Scholars Yousef al-Qaradawi, and Hamas Representative and Spokesman in Lebanon Usame Hamdan. In his speech at this conference, AKP deputy Zeyd Aslan said that Israel “commits genocide in Palestine.”

    On the other hand, the “Environment Conference” in July 2009 was organized by the Earth Centre of Dialogue Partners in cooperation with the Islamic Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, the city of Istanbul, and the Fatih University in Istanbul. The conference, attended by al-Qaradawi, concluded with the declaration of a seven-year-action plan on climate change. The conference also served as platform to bring Hamas and MB members to Istanbul.

    These conferences are organized by NGOs close to the AKP government. Although they appear to be civil society initiatives, the meetings are held in city halls of Istanbul or convention centers under the control of the AKP city government, which in essence means that taxpayer funds help pay for these events.

    Soner Cagaptay is a senior fellow and director of the Turkish Research Program at The Washington Institute.

  • Clinton’s Visit to Genocide Monument Necessary but not Sufficient

    Clinton’s Visit to Genocide Monument Necessary but not Sufficient

    sassounian3

    During her visit to Armenia on July 5, U.S. Secretary State Hillary Clinton placed a wreath at the Armenian Genocide Monument at Tsitsernakaberd in Yerevan. Regrettably, however, the U.S. Embassy in Armenia issued a press release describing the visit as “private.” By using such a characterization, U.S. officials were trying to preempt any backlash from the Turkish government.   In my opinion, the State Department mishandled Secretary Clinton’s visit to the Armenian Genocide Monument. Here are the reasons why:

    • There was no need to downplay the visit by characterizing it as “private,” since such visits are standard procedure for foreign dignitaries visiting Armenia.
    • Paying a visit to the Genocide Monument does not necessarily imply recognition of the Armenian Genocide, as all previous and current U.S. Ambassadors have visited this site every April 24.
    • Secretary Clinton’s visit to the Genocide Monument could not have been described as “private,” since it was a part of her “official” visit to Armenia.
    • The characterization of the visit as “private” was contradicted by the fact that the ribbons on the wreath she laid at the Genocide Monument carried the inscription: “From Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton.”
    • Clinton’s visit the day before to the “Alley of the Martyrs” in Baku was not described as “private,” creating the disturbing impression that U.S. interests in Azerbaijan’s oil weigh heavier than its humanitarian concerns for victims of genocide.
    • Another double standard was Clinton not allowing any Armenian government officials to accompany her to the Genocide Monument in Yerevan, while she was accompanied to the “Alley of Martyrs” in Baku by a Deputy Minister of Azerbaijan!
    • Clinton permitted neither the international press traveling with her nor the local Armenian media, except Armenian Public TV, to report on her visit to the Genocide Monument. Her action undermines her advocacy for media freedom.
    • There was no reason for Secretary Clinton to be coy about Genocide recognition, since Pres. Reagan had acknowledged it in 1981, and the U.S. House of Representatives had recognized it in 1975 and 1984.

    Even though the State Department downgraded Secretary Clinton’s visit to the Monument, Armenian officials did their best to publicize it as much as possible! This time they acted more decisively than last May, when Mevlut Cavusoglu — Turkish President of Council of Europe’s Parliamentary Assembly — refused to visit the Genocide Monument. They insisted that the Secretary add to her itinerary a stop at the Genocide Monument. They then arranged for Armenian Public TV and other TV stations to repeatedly air the video of Clinton’s July 5 visit to the Monument.

    In addition, the website of the State-owned Armenian Genocide Museum prominently featured Clinton’s visit by displaying photos of her wreath with ribbons that carried a visible inscription of her name and title, and an authentic medal issued by the American Near East Relief Committee that Museum Director Hayk Demoyan presented her.

    Pointing across the Turkish border, Demoyan told Secretary Clinton that Mount Ararat is “a symbol of Armenia.” In addition to explaining the basic facts of the Armenian Genocide, Demoyan told her that the graves of heroes fallen in Artsakh (Karabagh) were located near the Monument, since Armenians consider that war to be a continuation of the Armenian Genocide. The Secretary was also given a historical photo in which Armenian children in the American orphanage of Alexandropol (Gumri) were standing in formation that spelled out the words: “AMERICA, WE THANK YOU.”

    Clinton’s visit was both praised and criticized by Armenian-American organizations. The Armenian National Committee of America took Clinton to task for her “secret” visit to the Genocide Monument, while the Armenian Assembly of America commended her for the visit. Former U.S. Ambassador to Armenia, John Evans, told The California Courier that “Clinton’s visit was a small, but positive step forward.” The last Secretary of State to have visited Armenia was James Baker in 1992, who did not, however, make a stop at the Genocide Monument.

    In my view, Secretary Clinton should be commended for making such a positive gesture, but also blamed for going to such lengths to downplay her visit to the Genocide Monument. Why was she so concerned about offending Turks who have brazenly undermined every major U.S. foreign policy initiative in recent months?   Unfortunately, Secretary Clinton, Vice President Biden and Pres. Obama have drifted far away from their campaign promises to recognize the Armenian Genocide! Clinton’s brief stop at the Genocide Monument on July 5 is a welcome first step that fell short of her solemn commitment to support recognition of the Armenian Genocide.

    ================== COMMENT —- YORUM ================================================

    Democrats are in serious trouble. They need every vote they can get in November so that is why they are posturing around.
    I would like to see the day when Turkey can care less and shrug off  the American and Armenian clamors, resolutions etc  about this farce of genocide.
    Turkey and Azerbaijan should unite more and defy this idiotic nonsense..
    Almost 80 million Turks being manipulated by a 2 million weakling nation and its masters in Washington…Disgusting….

    .. Oya Bain [oyabain@gmail.com]

  • Islam Explained in Layman’s Terms

    Islam Explained in Layman’s Terms

    DEGERLİ DOSTLAR
    BU  VE BENZERİ  MESAJLAR ARTTİ
    SURATLE YAYİLİYOR
    BUNU BANA GONDEREN   VE BODRUMDA  FARUK BEY OLARAK TANİNAN
    SU SİRALARDA  TURK VATANDASLİGİNA GECMEK UZERE OLAN   AMERİKALİ  ARKADASİM  (YASİ 70)
    ULKESİNDE  GELİSMEKTE OLAN NEFRET   SOYLEMİNE  DİKKAT CEKMEK  İSTEDİGİNİ BİLDİRDİ
    COK UZULDUGUNU  EKLEDİ
    USTELİK BUNU KENDİSİNE  YOLLAYAN   BİRLESMİS MİLLETLER ORGIUTUNDE YUKSEK DUZEY  GOREVLİ OLAN ARKADASİ DA   BU  NEFRET SOYLEMİNE  KATİLMAK İSTEMEDİGİNİ
    BUNA RAGMEN   DURUMU  BİLGİMİZE  SUNMAK İSTEDİGİNİ  BELİRTMİS

    MEDENİYETLER   YA DA DİNLERARASİ  BARİS  VE BUNU SAGLAMAGA YONELİK  GİRİSİMLER
    KİFAYETSİZ KALİYOR
    HUNTİNGTON HAKLİ Mİ SORULARİ SORULUYOR
    BU BAGLAMDA TURKİYENİN  ROLU  DE   DOGAL OLARAK  GUNDEMDE ON PLANA CİKİYOR

    URDUNDEN  SOZ  EDEN VAR Mİ?  SUUDİLLERE   MİSİR  TAM SİPER…

    ZİRA  ULKEMİZ   SON BİR KAC YİLA KADAR   BOLGEDE  BİR DENGE  OGESİ İSLEVİNİ  YURUTUYORDU
    YA DA BİZ OYLE SANİYORDUK

    AKP  HUKUMETİNİN  HAMAS’İN  DEMOKRATİK YONTEMLE SECİLMİS  GRUP OLDUGU  VE  “MUSLUMAN TEROR  EYLEMİ YAPMAZ” SOYLEMİ
    (HAMAS  SON OLARAK  SECİME  GİTMEYİ REDDETTİ-UNUTMAYALİM)
    -İRAN  NUKLEER SİLAH YAPMİYOR  SAVİ
    (BU ORNEKLERİ  ARTTİRABİLİRİM- HEPİMİZİN BİLDİGİ  KONULAR)

    TURKİYEYİ  MUTTEFİKLERİNDEN  UZAKLASTİRİYOR
    BASİMİZİ KUMA SOKARAK BUNLARİ GORMEZLİKTEN GELEMEYİZ
    DAHA  DOGRUSU
    BASKALARİNİN BİZİ NASİL GORDUGU HUSUSUNU    GAYRİ, VAKİ-YANLİS-ONYARGİLİ DİYEREK  SAVUSTURAMAYİZ
    ONLARİN  GORUSUNU BU  KABİL  YANİTLARLA  DEGİSTİREMEYİZ.

    SAYİN BASBAKANİMİZ İLE OBAMA ARASİNDAKİ  SON GORUSMEDE BU HUSUS  KENDİLERİNE
    NAZİK BİR USLUPLA  AMA    SERAHATLE   ANLATİLMİS

    GELİSMELER  AKİLCİ ADİMLAR İLE   VE GETREKTİİGİNDE  GERİ ADİM  ATİLARAK DUZELTİLMEZ İSE TURKİYE  İRAN VE HAMAS  İLE BİRLİKTE  YANLİZLİGA  SURUKLENİR

    TABİİ BU DA BİR SECİMDİR   İRAN’İN  TAVRİ BİR SECİM OLDUGU GİBİ
    AMA BEDELİNİ  COK AGİR BİR SEKİLDE ODEME DURUMUNDA KALABİLİRİZ

    CARİ ACİK-KİBRİS- TEROR-  EGE  VESAİRE GİBİ KAMBURLARİMİZ VAR

    BU ALANLARDA  (YENİ MUTTEFİKLERİMİZ) BİZE  YARDİMCİ OLAMAZLAR- BUGUNE KADAR  OLMADİLAR DA

    BENİ DUISUNCEYE SEVKEDEN   EN ONEMLİ HUSUS
    ASAGİDAKİ MESAJİN İCERDİGİ  DEGERLENDİRMENİN    YAYGİNLLASMASİ  VE  ADETA
    UZERİNDE BUYUK MUTABAKA B ULUNAN BİR   “GERCEK”  HALİNE GELMESİ

    PULAT TACAR

    Turkish Forum Danisma Kurulu Uyesi

    Buyukelci (E)

    ===============================================================================

    Adapted from Dr.. Peter Hammond’s book: Slavery, Terrorism and Islam: The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat

    Islam is not a religion, nor is it a cult. In its fullest form, it is a complete, total, 100% system of life.

    Islam has religious, legal, political, economic, social, and military components. The religious component is a beard for all of the other components.

    Islamization begins when there are sufficient Muslims in a country to agitate for their religious privileges.

    When politically correct, tolerant, and culturally diverse societies agree to Muslim demands for their religious privileges, some of the other components tend to creep in as well.

    Here’s how it works:

    As long as the Muslim population remains around or under 2% in any given country, they will be for the most part be regarded as a peace-loving minority, and not as a threat to other citizens. This is the case in:

    United States — Muslim 0.6%
    Australia — Muslim 1.5%
    Canada — Muslim 1.9%
    China — Muslim 1.8%
    Italy — Muslim 1.5%
    Norway — Muslim 1.8%

    At 2% to 5%, they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups, often with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs. This is happening in:

    Denmark — Muslim 2%
    Germany — Muslim 3.7%
    United Kingdom — Muslim 2.7%
    Spain — Muslim 4%
    Thailand — Muslim 4.6%

    From 5% on, they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population. For example, they will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature halal on their shelves — along with threats for failure to comply. This is occurring in:

    France — Muslim 8%
    Philippines — 5%
    Sweden — Muslim 5%
    Switzerland — Muslim 4.3%
    The Netherlands — Muslim 5.5%
    Trinidad & Tobago — Muslim 5.8%

    At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves (within their ghettos) under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islamists is to establish Sharia law over the entire world.

    When Muslims approach 10% of the population, they tend to increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions. In Paris, we are already seeing car-burnings. Any non-Muslim action offends Islam and results in uprisings and threats, such as in Amsterdam,  with opposition to Mohammed cartoons and films about Islam. Such tensions are seen daily, particularly in Muslim sections in:

    Guyana — Muslim 10%
    India — Muslim 13.4%
    Israel — Muslim 16%
    Kenya — Muslim 10%
    Russia — Muslim 15%

    After reaching 20%, nations can expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings, and the burnings of Christian churches and Jewish synagogues, such as in:

    Ethiopia — Muslim 32.8%

    At 40%, nations experience widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks, and ongoing militia warfare, such as in:

    Bosnia — Muslim 40%
    Chad — Muslim 53.1%
    Lebanon — Muslim 59.7%

    From 60%, nations experience unfettered persecution of non-believers of all other religions (including non-conforming Muslims), sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon, and Jizya, the tax placed on infidels, such as in:

    Albania — Muslim 70%
    Malaysia — Muslim 60.4%
    Qatar — Muslim 77.5%
    Sudan — Muslim 70%

    After 80%, expect daily intimidation and violent jihad, some State-run ethnic cleansing, and even some genocide, as these nations drive out the infidels, and move toward 100% Muslim, such as has been experienced and in some ways is on-going in:

    Bangladesh — Muslim 83%
    Egypt — Muslim 90%
    Gaza — Muslim 98.7%
    Indonesia — Muslim 86.1%
    Iran — Muslim 98%
    Iraq — Muslim 97%
    Jordan — Muslim 92%
    Morocco — Muslim 98.7%
    Pakistan — Muslim 97%
    Palestine — Muslim 99%
    Syria — Muslim 90%
    Tajikistan — Muslim 90%
    Turkey — Muslim 99.8%
    United Arab Emirates — Muslim 96%

    100% will usher in the peace of ‘Dar-es-Salaam’ — the Islamic House of Peace. Here there’s supposed to be peace, because everybody is a Muslim, the Madrasses are the only schools, and the Koran is the only word, such as in:

    Afghanistan — Muslim 100%
    Saudi Arabia — Muslim 100%
    Somalia — Muslim 100%
    Yemen — Muslim 100%

    Unfortunately, peace is never achieved, as in these 100% states the most radical Muslims intimidate and spew hatred, and satisfy their blood lust by killing less radical Muslims, for a variety of reasons.

    ‘Before I was nine I had learned the basic canon of Arab life. It was me against my brother; me and my brother against our father; my family against my cousins and the clan; the clan against the tribe; the tribe against the world, and all of us against the infidel. — Leon Uris, ‘The Haj’

    It is important to understand that in some countries, with well under 100% Muslim populations, such as France, the minority Muslim populations live in ghettos, within which they are 100% Muslim, and within which they live by Sharia Law. The national police do not even enter these ghettos. There are no national courts, nor schools, nor non-Muslim religious facilities. In such situations, Muslims do not integrate into the community at large. The children attend madrasses. They learn only the Koran. To even associate with an infidel is a crime punishable with death. Therefore, in some areas of certain nations, Muslim Imams and extremists exercise more power than the national average would indicate.

    Today’s 1.5 billion Muslims make up 22% of the world’s population.. But their birth rates dwarf the birth rates of Christians, Hindus, Buddhists, Jews, and all other believers. Muslims will exceed 50% of the world’s population by the end of this century.

    Adapted from Dr. Peter Hammond’s book: Slavery, Terrorism and Islam: The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat

    Now ponder the following:

    Obama appoints two devout Muslims to Homeland Security posts. Doesn’t this make you feel safer already?

    Obama and Janet Napolitano appoint Arif Alikhan, a devout Muslim, as Assistant Secretary for Policy Development.

    DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano swore in Kareem Shora, a devout Muslim who was born in Damascus, Syria, as ADC National Executive Director as a member of the Homeland Security Advisory Council (HSAC).

    NOTE: Has anyone ever heard a new government official being identified as a devout Catholic, a devout Jew or a devout Protestant…?

    Devout Muslims being appointed to critical Homeland Security positions? Doesn’t this begin to explain why the Nigerian would-be suicide bomber on the watch list almost brought the plane down?

    ========================= YORUM =============================================

    To: turkish-forum-advisory-board@googlegroups.com
    Subject: Antw: [TFAB:9903] : Fw: Islam Explained in Layman’s Terms
    Selam Arkadaslar,
    Bu yazi ” from Peter Hammond’s book..”, Kilise yayinlari gibi kokuyor biraz!
    Adam Muslumanlar hakkinda o kadar bilgi ve statistik toplamis ki!! Hmmm.
    Katolik hukumet gorevlisi var mi diye soruyor bir de; Katolizmin, devlet
    olarak Anasi var (Vatikan) ve bu tip calismalari da organize ve finanse eden de o.
    Evet, Siyasi islam oldukca palazlasmis keyfe gelmis, ama bunu bile
    besleyenlerin kim oldugu hakkinda  suphem vardir. Unutmayin, bu platforum da
    da, bazi siyasilerin nasil basa getirildigi defalarca yazilmis, cizilmis.
    Hem de unutmayin ki; Samuel Huntington siradan bir Yazar veya Akademik
    degil di – ABD DISISLERI Bakanligi Danismanligini omru boyunca yapmis olan
    bir Zat idi. Gerisini Arif olan anlar.
    Selam ve saygilarla
    Kufi Seydali
    Kufi Seydali [Kufi.Seydali@WTHG.AT]
    ===================================== YORUM ====================================
    DUNKU MARUZATİMİ  TEYİD  EDEN  MAHMUZLAMALARA BİR YENİ ORNEK

    Reuters gibi kuvvetli bir ajansın
    2009 yılı Dünya  fotoğrafları arasına
    2010 Avrupa Kültür Başkentlerinden biri olan İSTANBUL’dan,
    hatta Türkiye’den ,
    maalesef sadece aşağıdaki kare seçilmiş,
    Ve koydukları isme bakın: ( İSTANBULUN PENGUENLERİ)

    Pulat Tacar [tacarps@gmail.com]

    ‘Istanbul Penguenleri’

    REUTERS yılın  fotoğraflarını yayımlamış bile. Türkiye için seçtiği

    ISTANBUL PENGUEN

    Reuters’ın seçtiği yılın fotoğrafları – 1Uluslararası Haber ajansı Reuters’ın her yıl belirlediği “yılın fotoğrafları”

    bu yıl da dünyadan çarpıcı kareler ile seçildi. Türkiye’den ise yılın fotoğrafları arasına giren fotoğraf, bir banka oturmuş

    Haliç’i izleyen 4 çarşaflı kadının olduğu bir kare oldu. İşte Reuters tarafından seçilen ve bu yılın kameralara

    yansıyan en ilginç fotoğrafları…

  • Fethullah Gulen’s cave of wonders

    Fethullah Gulen’s cave of wonders

    By Spengler feto gulenTAKKELI

    We’ve been had, boys and girls: the international community, the world press, Israeli intelligence, the United Nations, the lot of us. The existential drama off the Gaza coast turns out to be a Turkish farce, the kind of low comedy that in 1782 Wolfgang Mozart set to music in the opera The Abduction from the Seraglio, with Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan playing the buffo-villain Osmin and Turkish self-exiled preacher and author Fethullah Gulen as the wise Pasha Selim.

    In the post-American world, where every wannabe and used-to-be power makes momentary deals with other powers it plans to kill later, one makes inferences with caution. But I’ve seen this opera before.

    Gulen, who lives in Pennsylvania in the United States, was silent as a jinn in a bottle about politics until last Friday, when he told

    the Wall Street Journal that the Free Gaza flotilla’s attempt to run the Israeli blockage of Gaza “is a sign of defying authority, and will not lead to fruitful matters”.

    Erdogan’s Islamists have run a two-year campaign of judicial activism against secular politicians, journalists and army officers, and secular critics long have alleged that Gulen is the clerical power behind the prime minister.

    For the secretive Gulen to criticize the Turkish government in the midst of its public rage against Israel is an imam-bites-dog story. Gulen appears to have positioned himself as a mediator with Israel. Turkey does not want to end its longstanding relationship with Israel; it wants Israel to become a Turkish vassal-state in emulation of the old Ottoman model.

    The killing last week by Israeli commandos of nine activists on board the Mavi Marmara served numerous goals, and Gulen’s grand return to Turkish politics appears to be one of them. The question that every commentator in the Turkish press asked over the weekend, in one form or other, was: When will this voice of Muslim moderation re-emerge as an open force in the ruling Islamist party?

    There is every indication that the Turkish government dispatched the Gaza flotilla in order to stage a violent confrontation. The Erdogan government announced that it had carefully vetted the passenger list on the Mavi Marmara, which is to say that it knew that many of the passengers boarded with the intention of achieving “martyrdom” in a clash with the Israelis. They must have known this, for both the Turkish as well as the Palestinian press ran interviews with family members of some of the nine dead passengers explaining this intent.

    The passengers’ plans for martyrdom have been celebrated in the Arab press, and translated on the website of the Middle East Media Research Institute. The Turkish government also knew that the Insani Yardim Vakfi (IHH), the Islamic charity behind the Gaza flotilla, had ties to Hamas, for it had banned the IHH from charitable activity in Turkey a decade ago due to its connection to an organization that the previous secular government regarded as terrorist.

    What explains Israel’s apparent intelligence failure? Israel fields a small service tasked with operations in Iran, southern Lebanon, Gaza and Syria among other prospective enemies. The Mossad probably relied on counterparts in Turkish intelligence – with whom it has a long history of collaboration – to cover the passenger list on the Mavi Marmara. The often-unreliable Debka claims that “Turkish intelligence duped Israel”, which in this case is likely. By stealth or by sloth, Israel was roped into the comedy.

    The star of the comedy, at least for the Turkish media, is Gulen. The 78-year-old imam has lived in self-imposed exile for two decades, due to charges by Turkish prosecutors that he led a conspiracy to subvert the secular state. He presides over Turkey’s largest religious movement, commanding the loyalty of two-thirds of the Turkish police, according to some reports. His movement – a transnational civic society movement inspired by Gulen’s teachings – also controls a network of elite schools that educate a tenth of the high school students in the Turkic world from Baku to Kyrgyzstan. And it reportedly controls businesses with tens of billions of dollars in assets.

    His movement has been expelled from the Russian Federation and his followers arrested in Uzbekistan by local authorities who believe his goal is a pan-Turkic union from the Bosporus to China’s western Xinjiang province (“East Turkestan” to Gulen’s movement).

    In Mozart’s Abduction, Belmonte and Pedrillo descend into the pasha’s harem to rescue Kostanze; in last week’s version, Israeli commandos descended onto the Mavi Marmara. And there is the stock villain of Viennese comedy, the Turk Osmin, played by Erdogan. The predictable occurs, and the prospective Shahidi become actual corpses. And Erdogan threatens Israel with terrible things, in emulation of Mozart’s Osmin, who sings:

    “First you’ll be beheaded!
    Then hanged!
    Then spitted on hot stakes!
    Then bound, and burned, and drowned, and finally skinned!”

    This, one supposes, is supposed to frighten the children in the audience, who then will smile and clap when the Wise Old Man enters to urge moderation, caution and respect for authority, in the person of Gulen.

    The Islamic shift in Turkey has been underway for years. As Rachel Sharon-Krespin wrote in the Middle East Quarterly (Winter 2009):

    As Turkey’s ruling Justice and Development Party (Adalet ve Kalkinma Partisi, AKP) begins its seventh year in leadership, Turkey is no longer the secular and democratic country that it was when the party took over. The AKP has conquered the bureaucracy and changed Turkey’s fundamental identity. Prior to the AKP’s rise, Ankara oriented itself toward the United States and Europe. Today, despite the rhetoric of European Union accession, Prime Minister Erdogan has turned Turkey away from Europe and toward Russia and Iran and re-oriented Turkish policy in the Middle East away from sympathy toward Israel and much more toward friendship with Hamas, Hezbollah, and Syria.

    We are now in a post-American world, at least where the Barack Obama administration is concerned, and Turkey like its neighbors is scrambling for position. What does Turkey want in a post-American world?

    The question itself seems stupid, for the obvious answer is: “Whatever it can get.” It wants to become the dominant regional power rather than Iran, casting a wolfish glance at Iran’s Azeri population, who speak Turkish rather than Persian. It wants to “mediate” the Israeli-Palestinian issue and is not squeamish about its prospective partners. It wants Palestine to be an Ottoman province once again. It wants to be the energy hub for the Middle East and the outlet for Russian and Azerbaijani pipelines.

    But it is a bit more complex than that. Modern Turkey is an artificial construct, rather than a nation-state in the Western sense. Since the Turks completed the conquest of Byzantine Anatolia in the middle of the 14th century, a relatively thin crust of ethnic Turks has ruled over subject peoples. The Ottoman Empire at various points in its history had a Christian majority; its civil service at different points was more Venetian, Armenian and Jewish then Turkish; its self-understanding was global and religious, that is, as the caliphate of Islam, rather than as a national entity.

    When World War I reduced Turkey to an Anatolian rump, Kemal Ataturk attempted to impose “Turkishness” as a secular, national ideology on the European model. To make the country “Turkish”, several million Orthodox Christians were estimated to have been killed. The hollowness of Ataturk’s secular construct, modeled on the nastier European national movements, made it vulnerable from the beginning. The army was the only institution that could hold Turkish society together.

    What will replace Ataturk’s secularism? I wrote two years ago:

    If political Islam prevails in Turkey, what will emerge is not the same country in different coloration, but a changeling, an entirely different nation. In a 1997 speech that earned him a prison term, Erdogan warned of two fundamentally different camps, the secularists who followed Kemal, and Muslims who followed sharia. These are not simply different camps, however, but different configurations of Turkish society at the molecular level. Like a hologram, Turkey offers two radically different images when viewed from different angles. Turkish Islam, the ordering of the Anatolian villages and the Istanbul slums, represents a nation radically different than the secularism of the army, the civil service, the universities and the Western-leaning elite of Istanbul. If the Islamic side of Turkey rises, the result will be unrecognizable. Turkey in the throes of Islamic revolution? Asia Times Online, July 22, 2008.

    Gulen’s pan-Turkic mysticism views Turkey as the center of a new caliphate uniting the Muslim world. He preaches a “Turkish renaissance” with a modern spin “to ensure that religion and science go together and that science penetrates not only individual lives, but also social life”. His schools educate the elite of the Turkic world across Asia. Gulen’s interest, to be sure, focuses on the Turkish state, whose bureaucracy is now filled with his acolytes. But unlike Ataturk’s secular nationalism, which tried to redefine Turkey on a European model, Gulen’s Islamism is inherently expansionist.

    What Gulen means by science is of an entirely different order than the Western understanding. This “imam from rural Anatolia”, as his website describes him, inhabits the magical world of jinns and sorcery. Science is just a powerful form of magic of which Turks should avail themselves to enhance their power, as he writes in his 2005 book, The Essentials of the Islamic Faith:

    Jinn are conscious beings charged with divine obligations. Recent discoveries in biology make it clear that God created beings particular to each realm. They were created before Adam and Eve, and were responsible for cultivating and improving the world. Although God superseded them with us, he did not exempt them from religious obligations.

    As nothing is difficult for God almighty, he has provided human beings, angels and jinns with the strength appropriate for their functions and duties. As he uses angels to supervise the movements of celestial bodies, he allows to humans to rule the Earth, dominate matter, build civilizations and produce technology.

    Power and strength are not limited to the physical world, nor are they proportional to bodily size … Our eyes can travel long distances in an instant. Our imagination can transcend time and space all at once … winds can uproot trees and demolish large buildings. A young, thin plant shoot can split rocks and reach the sunlight. The power of energy, whose existence is known through its effect, is apparent to everybody. All of this shows that something’s power is not proportional to its physical size; rather the immaterial world dominates the physical world, and immaterial entities are far more powerful than material ones.

    He goes on to warn about sorcery and the danger of spells; he allows that it is meritorious to break spells (for evil witches are everywhere casting spells), although a good Muslim should not make a profession of this, for then he might be mistaken for a sorcerer himself. The notion that “wind” and “energy” are “immaterial” forces exudes the magical world view of an Anatolian peasant; the miracles of technology are the secret actions of jinn, just as the planetary movements are the actions of angels. When Gulen talks about the union of religion and science, what he means quite concretely is that the magical view of jinns in the Koran aids the believer in enlisting these “immaterial” forces to enhance the power of Islam. Science for Gulen means the management of jinn.

    Gulen, in short, is a shaman, a relic of pre-history preserved in the cultural amber of eastern Anatolia. Kemalism was sterile, brutal, secular and rational; the “moderate Islam” of Gulen is magical, a mystic’s vision of Ottoman restoration and a pan-Turkic caliphate.

    The Erdogan government crafted the Mavi Marmara affair as a piece of theater, preparing the deus ex machina (god from the machine) entrance of Gulen himself, more Pagliaccio than Apollo, to be sure. The trouble is that the Turkish Islamists live in a world of magical realism in which theater and reality, human and jinn, desire and achievement blend into a mystical blur. Gulen explains in his The Essentials of the Islamic Faith that Allah created the jinn out of fire. And that is what the apologists for Turkish Islamism are playing with.

    Spengler is channeled by David P Goldman, senior editor of First Things (www.firstthings.com).