Tag: Pope

  • Cardinal Ratzinger Moderated Opposition to Turkey Joining Europe on Becoming Pope

    Cardinal Ratzinger Moderated Opposition to Turkey Joining Europe on Becoming Pope

    The Guardian reports on wikileaks cables regarding the position of the Catholic Church on Europe’s Christian character and its unease with Turkey joining the EU. (the cable is here.)

    The problem is that, while the article on this matter is clear and largely accurate, the headline: “Pope wanted Muslim Turkey kept out of EU” is grossly incorrect.

    In 2004, then Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger (now Pope Benedict) spoke out against allowing Turkey to join the European Union. This position was not that of the Church as a whole. Indeed, a cable from that year says that “Acting Vatican Foreign Minister equivalent Monsignor Pietro Parolin told Charge August 18 that the Holy See remained open to Turkish EU membership.”

    Contrary to what The Guardian implied, then, it seems clear to me that until he became pope, Ratzinger’s views on Turkey were not reflective of Vatican policy, and after he became Pope his stance changed dramatically in Turkey’s favor.

    Ratzinger and others were, in 2004, attempting to have the European Union acknowledge the Christian roots of Europe, and they were afraid that Turkey’s accession might make that declaration less likely. (Since so much of European history (including all the Greek philosophers, Jewish thought on social justice, Irish and Norse mythology, the lives of the Roman emperors until the 4th century CE, not to mention the long centuries of Arab Spain and the Muslim-dominated Balkans) happened outside a Christian framework, this position seems to me invidious.

    That the Vatican remained “open” to Turkish membership even after Cardinal Ratzinger became Pope is clear from a subsequent cable. The remaining reservations expressed by Vatican officials derived, at least as presented by Parolin, not from worries about the ancient Christian character of Europe, but concerns that Turkey’s human rights record needed to be reformed before it was admitted. From the Vatican’s point of view, Turkey’s Christians were badly mistreated, and their condition was just short of open persecution.

    On becoming Pope, Benedict appears fairly rapidly to have changed his earlier hard line position, to the point that his nuanced neutrality on the issue of Turkish accession to the EU could be misunderstood by Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erodogan as wholehearted support. The “pope expressed his hope for ‘ “joint Christian and Muslim action on behalf of human rights” and emphasized his hope that Turkey would be a “bridge of friendship and of fraternal cooperation between the East and West.” ‘ By 2006, as well, the US was hopeful that Pope Benedict could be a positive force for Turkey integration into Europe.

    Those hopes were not realized. Pope Benedict declared the Vatican officially neutral on the Turkey issue, since the Vatican is not an EU member state. The State Department cable speculated that “The Vatican might prefer to see Turkey develop a special relationship short of membership with the EU.” But if the Vatican was declining to push for this point of view and was actively neutral, this private wish is irrelevant in the world of diplomacy. If your official stance is neutrality, then that is your public position and others cannot abrogate it for you.

    I see these cables as the evolution of Cardinal Ratzinger from a key Vatican official concerned with ideology to a pope aware of his global responsibilities, who backed off opposition to Turkey joining Europe and declared a studied neutrality on the issue even while admitting pros (Turkey could be an interlocutor for largely Christian Europe with the Muslim world) and cons (for Turkey to join without implementing religious freedom would endanger this key value for all EU states).

    That is, my reading of the documents and the evolution of the Ratzinger position leads me to a conclusion precisely the opposite of the one implied by the Guardian’s headline. In fact, you only wish the Christian Right in the US was as capable of mature reflection on such issues and as willing to be pragmatic as this Pope.

    via Cardinal Ratzinger Moderated Opposition to Turkey Joining Europe on Becoming Pope: Wikileaks | Informed Comment.

  • Pope wanted Muslim Turkey kept out of EU

    Pope wanted Muslim Turkey kept out of EU

    WikiLeaks cables: Pope wanted Muslim Turkey kept out of EU

    Vatican diplomats also lobbied against Venezuela’s Hugo Chávez and wanted ‘Christian roots’ enshrined in EU constitution

    Heather Brooke and Andrew Brown

    guardian.co.uk, Friday 10 December 2010 21.30 GMT

    A WikiLeaks cable reports that Pope Benedict XVI, seen here being received by Turkish prime minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan in Ankara in 2006, 'might prefer to see Turkey develop a special relationship short of EU membership'. Photograph: Dylan Martinez/AFP/Getty Images

    The pope is responsible for the Vatican’s growing hostility towards Turkey joining the EU, previously secret cables sent from the US embassy to the Holy See in Rome claim.

    In 2004 Cardinal Ratzinger, the future pope, spoke out against letting a Muslim state join, although at the time the Vatican was formally neutral on the question.

    The Vatican’s acting foreign minister, Monsignor Pietro Parolin, responded by telling US diplomats that Ratzinger’s comments were his own rather than the official Vatican position.

    The cable released by WikiLeaks shows that Ratzinger was the leading voice behind the Holy See’s unsuccessful drive to secure a reference to Europe’s “Christian roots” in the EU constitution. The US diplomat noted that Ratzinger “clearly understands that allowing a Muslim country into the EU would further weaken his case for Europe’s Christian foundations”.

    But by 2006 Parolin was working for Ratzinger, now Pope Benedict XVI, and his tone had distinctly chilled. “Neither the pope nor the Vatican have endorsed Turkey’s EU membership per se,” he told the American charge d’affaires, “rather, the Holy See has been consistently open to accession, emphasising only that Turkey needs to fulfil the EU’s Copenhagen criteria to take its place in Europe.”

    But he did not expect the demands on religious freedom to be fulfilled: “One great fear is that Turkey could enter the EU without having made the necessary advances in religious freedom. [Parolin] insisted that EU members – and the US – continue to press the [Turkish government] on these issues … He said that short of ‘open persecution’, it couldn’t get much worse for the Christian community in Turkey.”

    The cables reveal the American government lobbying within Rome and Ankara for Turkish EU membership. “We hope a senior department official can visit the Holy See and encourage them to do more to push a positive message on Turkey and integration,” concluded the 2006 cable.

    But by 2009, the American ambassador was briefing in advance of President Barack Obama’s visit, that “the Holy See’s position now is that as a non-EU member the Vatican has no role in promoting or vetoing Turkey’s membership. The Vatican might prefer to see Turkey develop a special relationship short of membership with the EU.”

    Roman Catholicism is the only religion in the world with the status of a sovereign state, allowing the pope’s most senior clerics to sit at the top table with world leaders. The cables reveal the Vatican routinely wielding influence through diplomatic channels while sometimes denying it is doing so. The Vatican has diplomatic relations with 177 countries and has used its diplomatic status to lobby the US, United Nations and European Union in a concerted bid to impose its moral agenda through national and international parliaments.

    The US charge d’affaires D Brent Hardt told Parolin, his diplomatic counterpart in Rome, of “the Holy See’s potential to influence Catholic countries to support a ban on human cloning” to which Parolin emphasised his agreement with the US position and promised to support fully UN efforts for such a ban.

    On other global issues such as climate change, the Vatican sought to use its moral authority as leverage, while refusing itself to sign formal treaties, such as the Copenhagen accord, that require reporting commitments.

    At a meeting in January this year Dr Paolo Conversi, the pope’s representative on climate change at the Vatican’s secretariat of state, told an American diplomat that the Vatican would “encourage other countries discreetly to associate themselves with the accord as opportunities arise”.

    The Americans noted that Conversi’s offer to support the US, even if discreetly, was significant because the Vatican was often reluctant to appear to compromise its independence and moral authority by associating itself with particular lobbying efforts.

    “Even more important than the Vatican’s lobbying assistance, however, is the influence the pope’s guidance can have on public opinion in countries with large Catholic majorities and beyond.”

    The cables also reveal that the Vatican planned to use Poland as a trojan horse to spread Catholic family values through the structures of the European Union in Brussels.

    The then US ambassador to the Holy See, Francis Rooney, briefed Washington in 2006, shortly after the election of Pope Benedict XVI, that “the Holy See hopes that Poland will hold the line at the EU on ‘life and family’ issues that arise” and would serve as a counterweight to western European secularism once the country had integrated into the EU.

    The cable notes that Pope Benedict is preoccupied with Europe’s increasing psychological distance from its Christian roots.

    “He has continued to focus on Poland’s potential in combating this trend. This was one of the themes of the visit of several groups of Polish bishops to the Vatican at the end of last year [2005]. ‘It’s a topic that always comes up,’ explained Monsignor Michael Banach, the Holy See minister of foreign affairs country director for Poland. He told us that the two sides recognised that the Polish bishops needed to exert leadership in the face of western European secularism.”

    Across the Atlantic, the Vatican has told the Americans it wants to undermine the Venezuelan president, Hugo Chávez, in Latin America because of worries about the deterioration of Catholic power there. It fears Chávez is seriously damaging relations between the Catholic church and the state by identifying the church hierarchy as part of the privileged class.

    Monsignor Angelo Accattino, in charge of Caribbean and Andean matters for the Vatican, said Obama should reach out to Cuba “in order to reduce the influence of Chávez and break up his cabal in Latin America”.In December last year, America’s adviser for western Europe at the UN, Robert Smolik, said the Vatican observer was “as always active and influential behind the scenes” and “lobbied actively and influentially in the corridors and in informal consultations, particularly on social issues”.

    In 2001 another American diplomat to the Vatican stated: “The Holy See will continue to seek to play a role in the Middle East peace process while denying this intention.” (1792)

  • Satan is in the Vatican, says Pope’s exorcist

    Satan is in the Vatican, says Pope’s exorcist

    The Devil is in the Vatican and is behind the child sex abuse scandals that have rocked the Catholic Church, says the Pope’s chief exorcist.

    Pope

    Satan’s work could also be seen in cardinals who ‘do not believe in Jesus and bishops who are linked to the demon,’ said Father Gabriele Amorth.

    ‘When one speaks of “the smoke of Satan” [a phrase coined by Pope Paul VI in 1972] in the holy rooms, it is all true – including these latest stories of violence and paedophilia,’ he told La Repubblica newspaper.

    A series of sex abuse scandals, in countries including Ireland, have hit the Catholic Church recently.

    And earlier this week, the Pope’s brother, the Rev Georg Ratzinger, admitted hitting choirboys after he took over a renowned German choir in the 1960s.

    Mr Ratzinger said he was also aware of allegations of physical abuse at a school linked to the choir. Fr Amorth is said to have carried out more than 30,000 exorcisms and has been the top man in his field for 25 years.

    The 85-year-old, who is president of the International Association of Exorcists, once spoke out against the Harry Potter series of books, saying they opened children’s minds to the occult and black magic.

    He said the stories attempted to make a false distinction between black and white magic, a difference that ‘does not exist because magic is always a turn to the Devil’.

    Fr Amorth has also said Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin were possessed by Satan and the incident last year in which a mentally ill woman threw herself at the Pope was the work of the Devil.

    His favourite film, according to the Italian press, is The Exorcist, a ‘substantially exact’ but ‘exaggerated’ portrayal of possession.

    The Metro

  • Exposés:Highlights the organisational set-up, the secret locations and the people running the fascist party

    Exposés:Highlights the organisational set-up, the secret locations and the people running the fascist party

    Jim Dowson: How a militant anti-abortionist took over the BNP. Part I of a three part investigation.

    Through the keyhole

    A

    Today we start a serialisation from the current issue of Searchlight Magazine which features a special investigation into the heart of the BNP. We highlight the organisational set-up, the secret locations and the people running the fascist party. We expose how the running of the party has been outsourced to a rabid Loyalist anti-abortionist in Belfast and we reveal that this man is receiving European Union money for peace and reconciliation.

    We have also been busy working with the media. Many of the revelations and exposés we have read in the newspapers over the past few weeks have originated from Searchlight.

    Forty-seven years after Searchlight was first formed we are proving that we are still ahead of the game.

     

    From rags to riches

    By Gerry Gable

    Ten years ago Jim Dowson (pictured) was a down-at-heel anti-abortion campaigner and hardline Protestant, who had marched with a loyalist band that played songs in praise of the convicted loyalist murderer Michael Stone (pictured below).

    B

    His luck changed when he formed an alliance with Justin Barrett, a far-right Catholic lawyer and leader of the notorious Irish anti-abortion group Youth Defence, which had previously stormed buildings in Dublin in their crusade against a woman’s right to choose. In 2000 Barrett had attended a rally of the German nazi National Democratic Party, where he met Roberto Fiore, the Italian fascist friend and mentor of Nick Griffin, the BNP leader. The trip was arranged by Derek Holland, one of Griffin’s old colleagues from the days of the National Front Political Soldiers.

    Barrett attracted attention as the lead spokesperson of the successful Irish campaign against the Nice Treaty in 2001 and money started to flow from far-right anti-abortionists in the United States.

    In 1999 Dowson had formed Precious Life Scotland and it was through cooperation between his group and Youth Defence that he met Barrett. The link proved beneficial when Barrett pitched £50,000 into Dowson’s organisation to pay for the production of anti-abortion CDs and video tapes to be distributed to schools and churches in Northern Ireland and Scotland.

    Dowson was a “rent-a-cause” extremist who had been kicked out of the Orange Order. He has a list of criminal convictions including breach of the peace in 1986, possession of a weapon and breach of the peace in 1991 and criminal damage in 1992. Although a Protestant, he was happy to sell thousands of photographs of the Pope at inflated prices to Catholics in the Irish Republic.

    Barrett faded from the public arena after the Nice Treaty vote was rerun and went the other way. His political demise was hastened after the publication of his book The National Way Forward, in which he described immigration as “genocidal”. He also became increasingly antisemitic, influenced by the nazi leaders he had met in Germany.

    In contrast, Dowson’s campaigning activities grew. He turned his sights on gay people and encouraged his followers to abuse and threaten people who attended or worked in abortion clinics.

    This resulted in Dowson parting company with some of his Precious Life fellow activists, but he was now in a financial position to go it alone, turning his faction into the UK LifeLeague. He never looked back.

    Dowson, 45, started working with the British National Party late in 2007, and he quickly revolutionised its fundraising. His first appeal, launched at the time the BNP was tearing itself apart in an internal rebellion, was carried out as a free sample to show the party what he could do, but since then he has worked on a percentage commission.

    His work for the BNP grew to encompass the provision of manage-ment training in Spain and revamping the party’s administration. Early in 2009 he set up the Belfast call centre, piggybacking it on his successful fundraising for the LifeLeague, thereby cutting costs and perhaps giving doubtful BNP officers the impression of a larger operation than it actually is.

    Over the past two years he has clearly raised huge sums for the party, although it remains financially strapped. Partly this is the result of scams, such as the truth truck, which Griffin claimed had been bought with thousands of pounds of supporters’ donations. It turned out still to belong to Dowson’s private company, Adlorries.com, and, like much of the other equipment the BNP claimed to have bought, it was only leased by the party.

    Today Dowson practically owns the BNP, which he briefly joined to placate his critics but left as soon as the heat was off him. He remains at loggerheads with many senior party officers and employees. One, whom he sacked in spring, is heading for an employment tribunal.

    B1

    Griffin’s claim that the BNP is being flooded with donations via Dowson’s call centre is a lie. Income is down to a trickle and membership is a mere 8,000 or so. People are not queuing up to join after the end of the three-month moratorium on membership, they are leaving in droves, especially since the latest membership list leak from Dowson’s Belfast bunker.

    All this comes on top of the party’s forced climbdown over its racist constitution, the non-appearance of its 2008 accounts and concern over the number of senior party officers who have been put on the European Parliament payroll as staff of the two BNP MEPs.

     

    Hope Not Hate

  • The Pope’s Secret War on Radical Islam, Full Details

    The Pope’s Secret War on Radical Islam, Full Details

    The Great Crusader

    Pope Benedict XVI’s historic visit to the United States comes at a critical time for the Roman Catholic Church and the West.

    His visit comes as the Church grapples with a growing secularist trend in the U.S. and Europe – and a rising global threat from militant Islam.

    Newsmax magazine’s special report “The Great Crusader” reveals the behind-the-scenes effort the Pope is making to revitalize the ancient Church for its present battle and the important role he sees the United States and her people playing.

    You can also check out our FREE offer – the Emergency Radio – a $30 value and something every home must have. Go Here Now.

    This exclusive Newsmax report explores:

    • Hidden agenda: why the U.S. is “crucial” to the Catholic Church
    • What Benedict sees as the “central problem of our faith today”
    • The real story: Benedict’s path to the papacy
    • Troubles in the U.S. Church – dwindling mass attendance
    • Benedict’s take on the sexual abuse crisis within the Church
    • America’s most famous Catholic dissenter – Mel Gibson
    • Is Benedict the last “European Pope”?
    • Benedict and the abortion issue in the U.S.
    • The Pope’s experiences with German Nazis
    • Benedict’s plans for China’s “underground” Catholics
    • No coincidence: this is an election year and Hispanic Catholics are key
    • The rise of Islam in Christian Europe: the Church’s plan
    • Why Benedict rues the Second Vatican Council
    • The birth of Catholicism’s “charismatics”
    • The decline of American priests and nuns
    • Benedict’s amazing popularity in Rome
    • Why the Pope “snubbed” the Dalai Lama
    • The “astonishing” growth of Catholicism in Africa
    • “Cafeteria Catholics” who ignore some Church teachings
    • American evangelicals and the Catholic Church
    • Why Benedict’s moves could lead to a “civil war” within Catholicism
    • And much, much more

    Find out how you can get this report FREE – PLUS get an Emergency Radio worth $30 with our FREE offer. Go Here Now.

    This edition of Newsmax magazine is not to be missed.

    In addition to hard-hitting investigative reports and special commentary from Ben Stein, Dick Morris, John Stossel, Bill O’Reilly, Christopher Ruddy, David Limbaugh, Dr. Laura Schlessinger, Ed Koch, James Hirsen and others, you get much more in Newsmax magazine, including:

    • Small nukes are on campus
    • World Bank corruption hurting the poor
    • Do-it-yourself medical tests
    • States challenge the Electoral College
    • Deadline looms for digital TV: Are you ready?
    • U.S. horses slaughtered in Mexico for food
    • Drug smugglers go underwater with submarines
    • Schwarzenegger to Pentagon: Return Humvees
    • U.S. meat: Send in the clones
    • When a predator lives next door
    • Schools teach kids about guns
    • Bill Buckley in 1965: how he discovered the Reagan Democrats
    • C-SPAN’s Brian Lamb talks to Newsmax
    • High-tech device eases water woes
    • Tour America’s favorite ballparks
    • Apple juice does a body good: heart and mind

    PLUS: Ron Kessler’s Washington

    Again, there is so much more in Newsmax magazine, which won a Silver Eddie Award in the News/Commentary category of Folio magazine’s prestigious journalism awards, the Eddies.

    Find out why more than half a million people read Newsmax magazine each month.

    Better: Be one! Get our “Great Crusader” report and an Emergency Radio with our FREE offer – Go Here Now.

  • Man in the News: Pope Benedict XVI

    Man in the News: Pope Benedict XVI

    By Guy Dinmore

    Published: February 6 2009 19:17 | Last updated: February 6 2009 19:17

    As the head of the world’s oldest organisation, holding a global market share of 17.5 per cent and with defined values and established decision-making procedures, Joseph Ratzinger should be the envy of any corporate chief executive.

    Yet in the space of two weeks Pope Benedict XVI has stumbled into the worst crisis of his four-year-old papacy, dealing in the process the most serious blow to relations between the Roman Catholic Church and the Jewish faith in half a century. Cardinals and bishops are starting to mobilise in revolt. For the moment their disquiet is aimed at a handful of figures surrounding the 81-year-old pontiff who they fear is becoming a timid recluse, buried in his reading and writing, vulnerable to manipulation.

    That is the charitable explanation of why last month Pope Benedict lifted the excommunication of four ultra-traditionalist clerics, including British bishop Richard Williamson, who has questioned the extent of the Holocaust and denied the existence of gas chambers in Nazi death camps.

    But for progressive theologians this latest attempt by Benedict to heal a decades-old schism confirms his barely disguised sympathies for the doctrinal views of the ultra-conservatives and calls into question the reforms of the historic Second Vatican Council of 1965. The harm done to interfaith dialogue is considerable, says Miroslav Volf, an Episcopalian and professor of theology at Yale University. “This is not the first time that this pope has caused such interfaith damage. He is an equal opportunity interfaith offender,” Prof Volf tells the FT, recalling the angry response of Muslims to the Pope’s 2006 Regensburg speech interpreted as equating Islam with violence.

    “Only some of it can be attributed to the Vatican bureaucracy. He is over-zealous in protecting the truth of the faith and unity of the church, the hallmarks of his pontificate … His mistakes and blunders all lean in one direction, appealing to the traditionalists. He is not a Holocaust denier. But why this blunder?”

    The reactions from political and religious leaders – including Germany’s Chancellor Angela Merkel – have focused on Mr Williamson’s blatant anti-Semitic (and sexist) views. That the decree was issued just days before International Holocaust Remembrance Day was seen as a public relations disaster. One close follower of the Vatican says Pope Benedict’s media image as “God’s rottweiler” is wrong. “In reality he is timid, shy, bordering on the recluse and could potentially be bullied.”

    The pontiff is a popular teacher but appears cut-off, rarely giving access to cardinals and nuncios, unlike his predecessor. His isolation is a subject of considerable debate and mystery, as is how the decision was made to revoke the excommunication of the clerics, followers of the Pius X Fraternity established by Marcel Lefebvre, the schismatic French archbishop who died in 1991.

    Sandro Magister, a prominent commentator, blames Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, the secretary of state who is effectively the Vatican’s prime minister. The cardinal was “distinguished by his absence” in the affair, travelling in Mexico and Spain, indulging in endless rounds of conferences and celebrations. “Benedict XVI was left practically alone, and the curia (civil service) was abandoned to disorder,” Mr Magister writes on his blog.

    Others suggest the Italian cardinal – appointed by the Pope in September 2006 – played a more deliberate role, keeping key cardinals out of the decision-making process. They note he helped the then Cardinal Ratzinger in trying to negotiate a solution with Lefebvre in 1988, shortly before Pope John Paul excommunicated the rebel archbishop and the four bishops he had illegally ordained.

    In rare displays of public discord, prominent cardinals have expressed dismay at not being consulted. Cardinal Bertone was forced into damage control, issuing a statement that the Pope did not know of Mr Williamson’s views on the Holocaust. He also ordered the renegade bishop to recant his views if he wanted to serve as prelate in the Church.

    Mr Williamson’s remarks on the gas chambers were made to a Swedish television station in November but only released on January 21. That was the day the Vatican decided to lift his excommunication although the decree was not made public until three days later. The timing has led to a conspiracy theory that someone in the curia tipped off the broadcaster. Even so, Mr Williamson had aired similar statements before. As Rabbi Marvin Hier, dean of the Simon Wiesenthal Center, says: “All somebody had to do was Google him.”

    Others must have known, despite their denials, critics contend. One was Cardinal Dario Castrillon Hoyos who persuaded the Pope to reverse the excommunications. Cardinal Hoyos heads Ecclesia Dei, a group with ties to the ultra-traditionalists, sharing their adhesion to the traditional Latin mass whose return was permitted amid great controversy by the Pope in 2007. There are doubts Benedict will remove Cardinal Bertone, but a revolt by senior clerics could persuade him to resign.

    For Benedict – the first German pope since Victor II in 1055 – the furore must be painful. While he has been unapologetic in his rejection of religious pluralism, moral relativisim, economic liberalism, contraception, divorce, women priests and same-sex civil unions, he has consistently spoken out against the Holocaust and persecution of Jews.

    Born in 1927 in a Bavarian village not far from Hitler’s own birthplace, his childhood was spent in the shadow of the Third Reich. As a 14-year-old seminary student, he was obliged to join the Hitler Youth. He saw prisoners from the Dachau camp and Hungarian Jews shipped to their death. He was later sent to the Austrian Legion where he was “bullied by fanatical ideologues” and in 1945 he deserted, to be taken prisoner by US soldiers.

    Ordained in 1951, he became a professor of dogma and fundamental theology at age 30, starting a long life in academia. By 50 he was archbishop of Munich and soon a cardinal but with little pastoral experience. In 1978 Karol Wojtyla became Pope and in 1981 persuaded Cardinal Ratzinger to head the Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith, the Vatican’s enforcer of orthodoxy tracing its roots to the Holy Inquisition. He disciplined at least a dozen high profile, liberal Catholics. Some were excommunicated.

    Much is now at stake in how Benedict responds to this latest challenge to the Church. In an interview he gave when still a cardinal, he remarked however: “I am like the cellist Rostropovich. I never read the critics.”