Tag: PKK

  • Turkey puts more pressure on Europe to curb PKK activities

    Turkey puts more pressure on Europe to curb PKK activities

    The reluctance of many European countries to move against terrorist Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) activities on their soil continues to be a major concern for the Turkish government, which has been increasingly vocal in its demand for quick action to curb financial and logistical support to the outlawed organization.

    pkk londra

    A group of about 60 supporters of the terrorist PKK were able to get past security and gain entry to the Council of Europe in Strasbourg on Sept. 13, 2011. (Photo: Cihan)

    The PKK continues to operate in such countries as Germany, Austria, Belgium, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, Finland, the UK, France and Italy. Though the PKK has been experiencing hard times recently due to operations launched against the terrorist organization in some European countries, it continue to raise funds and find new recruits in others without any major difficulty, analysts say.

    The arrest and then conditional release of several PKK leaders in Belgium, the ongoing judicial process against the PKK in France and the ongoing case into the PKK-affiliated ROJ TV in Denmark are signs that the PKK may confront some difficulty in some European countries. Yet in others, especially in Germany, the PKK operates freely, runs public campaigns, courts politicians and collects money for terror attacks against Turkish military, police and civilian targets in Turkey.

    The latest criticism on the issue came from Parliament Speaker Cemil Çiçek, who lashed out at German authorities for turning a blind eye to PKK terror activities in Germany. Çiçek deliberately chose the venue to deliver his message when he was travelling on a symbolic train ride from İstanbul to Germany to commemorate the 50th anniversary of the emigration of Turkish workers to the European country.

    He said, “The number of outlawed PKK and Revolutionary People’s Liberation Party/Front [DHKP/C] members in Germany is twice that in Kandil [a mountain range in Iraq where the PKK’s headquarters are located].”

    Despite being listed as a terrorist organization in Germany, the PKK continues to operate under various names in the EU’s largest member country. The PKK has been listed as a terrorist organization by Germany since 1993; however, it continues to be active in the country under various names. Turkey has especially criticized Germany many times in recent years for not properly dealing with the PKK and other terrorist organizations active in Turkey and for not returning members of those organizations living in Germany, where it is estimated that around 4 million Turks live.

    Last month Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan also accused a number of German funds of funneling money to the PKK through loans offered to municipalities run by the pro-Kurdish Peace and Democracy Party (BDP), the political wing of the PKK.

    Süleyman Özeren, an associate professor at the Turkish National Police Academy, which specializes in security and terrorism, told Today’s Zaman that Germany stands out among other European countries as the most reluctant partner in combating the PKK. “Germany has become the most important country for the PKK not only in raising hundreds of millions of euros for the terror organization but also recruiting young militants to the PKK,” he said. Özeren underlined that Germany is the least willing to lend support to Turkish efforts in fighting PKK terror.

    “We do not see the German government taking effective measures to make it difficult for the terror organization to raise money or recruit new militants. The country has turned out to be the best place for the PKK to run terror propaganda openly and without any difficulty,” Özeren explained. He warned that it this continues unabated, both Germany and other European countries will pay a heavy price for harboring terror organization in their midst.”

    At the 2011 Bosporus Conference in İstanbul two weeks ago, Turkey’s EU Minister and chief negotiator Egemen Bağış also urged Europe to take more concrete steps against PKK terror. He asked European countries to work together with Turkey to combat terrorism, adding, “What al-Qaeda is to the West, the PKK is to Turkey.”

    “The PKK is not only an enemy of Turkey, but also of Europe because while the PKK kills Turkish people with bullets, it is killing European youth with drugs,” Bagış said.

    Strategic Research and Study Center (SAREM) head Önder Aytaç argues that European countries have a vested interest in seeing Turkey involved in internal problems so that it will be in a weak position. “As long as the PKK does not pose a threat to the vital interests of European countries, they will continue to turn a blind eye to PKK activities in their territories,” he said, adding that the European security agencies will not interfere with PKK activities at this stage. “They [PKK militants] do not engage in terror activities in host countries in Europe in order to not invite the wrath of the security services there,” Aytaç told Today’s Zaman.

    In fact, the EU’s police agency, Europol, in its latest report confirmed the PKK’s involvement in activities such as drug smuggling, human trafficking and money laundering. “Information obtained from EU member states shows, for instance, that both the PKK/Kongra-Gel are actively involved in drugs and human trafficking, the facilitation of illegal immigration, credit card skimming, money laundering and fraud for the purpose of funding terrorist [support] operations,” Europol said in its 2011 EU Terrorism Situation and Trend Report (TE-SAT).

    The report also said the PKK was pursuing a “double strategy” of resorting to violence in Turkey, while seeking legitimacy abroad and likely to pursue this double strategy. It also noted that the terrorism threat posed by the group to EU states can currently be considered as “relatively low.” “However, the large number of PKK/Kongra-Gel militants living in the EU and the continuing support activities in the EU, like large demonstrations organized in the past, show that the PKK/Kongra-Gel is in a position to mobilize its constituency at any time and is an indication that it maintains the capability to execute attacks in the EU,” it added.

    The 2011 report of the Federal Office for the Defense of the Constitution (Bundesverfassungsschutz) also confirmed Europol findings, saying that the PKK collects funds from Kurds in Germany and even sends people to join its militia arm, the People’s Defense Forces (HPG), who fight against the Turkish army and in the mountainous regions of northern Iraq. The report states that the PKK has 11,500 members in Germany. The report further indicates “a few million euros” have been collected by the organization. It also states that some Kurdish youths join the PKK; however, no exact figure is given on the number of people who have joined the terrorist organization.

    Another report by the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution in Austria, unveiled by Austrian Interior Minister Johanna Mikl-Leitner in early August, also confirms German findings. The report said the main goal of PKK activities in Europe is to finance the administrative units of the terrorist organization and win new members to the ranks of the PKK. The report drew attention to the contradictory attitudes of the PKK in Europe as the terrorist organization seems to adopt a pro-peace attitude on one side, while it still perpetuates its armed struggle. The reports say the PKK’s messages about adhering to democracy and abandoning violence and separatist ideas are not realistic.

  • ‘Europe backs PKK terrorists, affiliates’

    ‘Europe backs PKK terrorists, affiliates’

    Turkish EmbassadorTurkish Ambassador to Iran Umit Yardim says various groups affiliated to the terrorist Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) are stationed in Europe and are being funded and organized there.

    PKK, which is recognized as a terrorist group by much of the international community, has been fighting the central government in Turkey since 1984 in quest for an independent state in southwestern Turkey.

    “The arrest of [PKK leader Abdullah] Ocalan shows the extent of foreign support for the terrorist group. He was arrested in the house of Greek ambassador to Kenya while holding a Southern Cyprus passport,” Fars News Agency quoted Yardim as saying on Sunday.

    Stressing that PKK and its offshoot, the Party for Free Life of Kurdistan (PJAK), are both “problematic” entities for Iran and Turkey, Yardim said, “We understand better than anyone else the situation of our Iranian friends in combating terrorist groups.”

    PJAK terrorists regularly engage in armed clashes with Iranian security forces along the country’s western borders with Iraq’s semi-autonomous Kurdistan region.

    Press TV

  • Turkey to issue diplomatic note to France over PKK

    Turkey to issue diplomatic note to France over PKK

    Disisleri1The Turkish Embassy has officially filed a lawsuit regarding Wednesday\’s occupation.

    Turkey will give a note to France on Thursday regarding occupation of Turkish Tourism & Cultural Counsellor’s Office in Paris by PKK members.

    Diplomatic sources told AA correspondent that “Turkey would give a note to French Foreign Ministry on Thursday, and ask France to protect its diplomatic missions and representations in a better way, and not to tolerate members of the terrorist organization.”

    Turkey’s Ambassador to France Tahsin Burcuoglu met French Interior Minister Claude Gueant on Wednesday evening. It was a meeting scheduled beforehand as Gueant was planning to visit Turkey in coming days.

    During the meeting, Burcuoglu referred to occupation of Turkey’s Tourism & Culture Counsellor’s Office by PKK members and expressed Turkey’s uneasiness about PKK acts on French territories.

    The Turkish Embassy has officially filed a lawsuit regarding Wednesday’s occupation.

    During French Interior Minister Claude Gueant’s formal visit to Ankara on October 6, the two countries will “discuss cooperation against terrorism in detail” and they will sign a cooperation agreement on domestic security.

    Gueant and Turkish Interior Minister Idris Naim Sahin will put their signatures under the agreement which will cover concrete cooperation mechanisms in combatting terrorism.

    The agreement is important as it is the first time Turkey will sign such a comprehensive text on domestic security with an important European Union (EU) member state.

    Once the presidential secretary general and President Nicolas Sarkozy’s “right hand man,” Gueant will be received by Turkish President Abdullah Gul and Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan in Ankara.

    France is staging intense operations against the PKK in for the last two years.

    The Paris Court has recently tried 18 people, including top members in Europe. The prosecutor’s office demanded prison terms ranging between six months and six years for the suspects, and requested that the headquarters in Paris be closed.

    The court will make its verdict on the case on November 2.

    World Bullet

     

  • Turkey Condemns Terrorist Organization’s Acts İn European Countries

    Turkey Condemns Terrorist Organization’s Acts İn European Countries

    DisisleriTurkey condemned on Friday terrorist organization PKK’s acts in European countries.
    Turkish Foreign Ministry spokesperson Selcuk Unal said that Turkey strongly condemned acts of terrorist organization in several European countries that threatened public order and security, particularly the occupation of Turkish Cultural & Promotion Counsellor’s Office in Paris, France by members of the terrorist organization.
    “PKK members staged acts in several parts of Europe on September 28, and these incidents once more confirmed that terrorist organization PKK, as stated in reports prepared by the European Union (EU), has become a threat for Europe,” Unal said.
    Unal said PKK members invaded Turkish Cultural & Promotion Counsellor’s Office in Paris, France, and Turkey thought that European countries should get the necessary lesson caused by their tolerance towards the terrorist organization.
    “It is high time that the acts of PKK, functioning under different names, and their supporters were put an end,” Unal said.
    Unal said Turkey had voiced its expectations to French authorities that Turkish representations and their interests should be protected and people staging such illegal acts should be punished.
    The spokesperson also said that Turkey expressed its expectation that the authorities took required measures to protect Turkish diplomatic missions as soon as possible.

    Turkish Weekly

  • PKK: The Worst Enemy of Kurdish Interests

    PKK: The Worst Enemy of Kurdish Interests

    Bebek_katili
    Bebek_katili

    The naïveté in the West about the so-called “Kurdistan Workers’ Party” (PKK) decreased gradually during the last decade, but did not disappear. The reluctance of news agencies to even directly label it a terrorist organization is a remarkable example of incomplete evolution. The PKK maintains strong propaganda, and even pretends to represent “the Kurdish people”. The facts are in complete contradiction to their claim. Instead of improving the situation of the Kurds, the PKK’s misdeeds have always created new problems, or worsened pre-existing difficulties.

    Tension strategy

    The PKK was founded in 1978. During the five previous years, the situation in eastern Anatolia experienced some improvements, following the end of the military-backed regime (1971-1973). The development of universities anda revival of cultural activities were notable trends. The main difficulty was far-left terrorism — whose perpetrators were frequently close associates of the PKK — and the terrorist reaction on the part of the far right. Instead of taking note of these improvements and fighting against the terrorist violence, the PKK chose an extreme form of terrorism as the main, not to say the single, solution by which to achieve its goalsfrom the very beginning. Far from caring for the Kurds, the PKK, which at that time claimed a Maoist ideology, had the deepest contempt for their overwhelming majority.

    Not unlike the terrorist campaign of the Armenian organization Hunchak and Armenian Revolutionary Federation-Dashnak against the loyal Armenians and dissidents, from 1890 to 1914, the PKK attempted to exterminate all notable Kurdish individuals and political organizations which could challenge its pretentions to hegemony: the conservatives, like Mehmet Celâl Bucak (assassinated in 1979), the progressives (resulting in the decimation of the Kurdistan Socialist Party), those who advocated primarily for cultural rights, the supporters of administrative autonomy, and even the violent separatist groups which refused to merge with the PKK [Çağaptay 2007]. From 1978 to 1980 alone, the PKK assassinated 354 people and wounded 366; all were Kurdish [Mango 2005, p. 34].

    From 1980 to 1983, the military regime stopped the kind of civil war which risked to disintegrating Turkey — the methods used at that time, against both far left and far right terrorists, are a completely different issue, and the purpose of this paper is surely not to pretend that every action was fully justified; but the security goal was [İtil 1984; Mango, pp. 18-20]. If the use of Kurdish dialects was subjected to more than questionable restrictions in 1982, southeastern Anatolia received very significant help from the Southeastern Anatolia Project (Güneydoğu Anadolu Projesi, or GAP). The GAP provided electricity and running water to villages, which had primitive conditions of material life until that point, and developed irrigation. Whatever counter-terrorist methods employed during the military regime, there was no kind of “persecution” targeting the Kurds as Kurds: the Kurdish Turgut Özal was Minister of Economic Affairs from 1980 to 1982. As it is well known, Turgut Özal became Prime Minister at the end of the military regime (1983) and eventually President of the Turkish Republic (1989).

    Such a senseless strategy becomes more understandable when considering that the PKK was materially dependent on the USSR, its Bulgarian satellite State, and its Syrian ally [Mango 2005, pp. 34-35]. For its sponsors, the PKK was a tool against Turkey and NATO, nothing more, nothing less — a tool among others, for the Turkish far-left terrorist groups, or, in another field, the Palestinian terrorists [Sterling 1981, pp. 228-244].

    Blind and mass violence

    Instead of taking note of the economic improvement and to take advantage of the presence of a Kurd at the head of the Turkish government, the PKK launched its first great offensive in 1984. The violence of its actions increased in 1987, when civil targets became a priority. From 1987 to 2002, 5,335 civilians were butchered, including 96 teachers only because they were teaching in the Turkish language; the PKK completely demolished 114 schools and six hospitals, heavily damaging another 127 and eight of them respectively. Michael Rubin pertinently compares this strategy to that of the Khmers Rouge’s [Rubin 2008]. Such extreme violence provoked departures of PKK members and leaders. The mass destruction and the massacres of civilians do not prevent the PKK from alleging — falsely — that the Turkish administrations “neglect” the development of southeastern Anatolia. Actually, the main obstacle to economic development in this region was — or perhaps still is — the PKK itself. The PKK profited from the underdevelopment, hence its absence of interest in contributing to the prosperity of eastern Anatolia.

    As early as 1984, a local official of the PKK in Sweden left the group, and was assassinated; as a result, Sweden was one of the first Western countries to forbid PKK activities on its soil (it should be noted that A. Öcalan himself accused his ex-wife and ex-associate to have organized the assassination of Olof Palme, the Swedish Prime minister, in 1986). In 1988, Hüseyin Yıldırım, spokesman of the PKK in Europe, broke spectacularly with the PKK, saying that it was a scandal to massacre women and children. He was sufficiently lucky to escape to A. Öcalan’s killers[Mango 2005, p. 43].

    The PKK’s second major series of attacks happened in 1992, i.e. when Turgut Özal was president, and one year after the official recognition of the Kurdish ethnicity, recognition which included the end of the strictest restrictions on the use of the Kurdish dialects. Several Kurdish cultural associations were created in Turkey in the beginning of the 1990s. The PKK decided to use mostly terrorism, not democracy. The PKK terrorist attacks also targeted German tourists after the closure of the PKK’s political wing by the German government in 1993, and Israeli diplomatic missions in 1999 as a result of Mossad’s assistance in the arrest of Mr. Öcalan, the leader of the PKK.

    Since the end of the 1990s, in the context of the stabilization of Turkish political and economic life, the Ecevit and AKP governments widely expanded the outlets for the expression of Kurdish cultural activities. The single response of the PKK to the laws passed from 2001-2004 was a new wave of attacks. Its single response to the “Kurdish opening” of 2009 was a cease-fire which was actually never implemented.

    The PKK’s propaganda pretends that only police and military are targeted. To kill policemen and soldiers in ambush is by no means excusable — this is terrorism — but the PKK never did limit its targets to security forces. Several examples were provided already. A recent and striking one is the assassination of an 18-year-old Kurd, Serap Eser, in 2009. In 2006-2007, the PKK burned many shops owned by peaceful Turkish traders, in France, Germany, Switzerland, Finland, and other countries. Such actions have no motivation but pure racism — and perhaps also the hope to worsen the relations between ethnic Turks and ethnic Kurds. In 2009, eleven Kurds were sentenced by the Paris tribunal, from 18 months to five years in jail, for arson and the fundraising of terrorist activities. Some others were sentenced in Germany [Libération Bordeaux 2009; State Department Report 2009]. Similarly, Çayan Tekiner was sentenced by the French justice system to two years in prison for attempted arson (by Molotov cocktail) against Turkey’s Permanent Representation at the Council of Europe in Strasbourg. Such decisions are fully backed by the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights, which confirmed, on January 27, 2011, the decision of the German justice system (first instance, appeal, Constitutional Court) to sentence a pro-PKK agitator, who had launched a petition of “support” to the “democratic fight of the PKK” in 2001.

    The current KCK court case (151 people indicted for supporting the PKK, physical threats, and other crimes) and the abduction of the son of Fehtullah Mehmetoğlu, the AKP mayor of Hazro (south-eastern Anatolia),illustrated the continuation of physical intimidation by the PKK and its supporters against any Kurd who would challenge their criminal activities and designs [Zaman 2010-2011].

    Gangsters’ methods and alliance with the Armenian nationalists

    The PKK used violence against Kurds for not only purely political, but also financial reasons. Far from obtaining systematic and spontaneous support from the Kurdish immigrants, the PKK had to use racketeering, as well as narcotics trafficking, to pay for its expensive terrorist activities [Çağaptay 2007; Haut 1998; Laçiner 2007; Minassian 2002, p. 194]. Such criminal activities began even while Greece, Southern Cyprus, and some others were providing material support to the PKK at the time. For instance, in 2000, Irfan Balsak was sentenced by the Paris tribunal to four years in jail and ten years in exile for various charges, including racketeering against Kurdish traders in the 1990s. More recently, the investigation by the French magistrate (juge d’instruction) Thierry Fragnoli dismantled a racketeering network in France. It should be stressed that this investigation was launched thanks to the complaints of Kurdish traders, who had been assaulted by PKK members. The verdict will be announced in November. Similarly, Mr. Fragnoli’s investigation demonstrated the PKK’s use of religious discourse to recruit and manipulate young Kurds, a finding which corroborates Turkish and British sources on the use of teenagers by the PKK, who are mostly abducted, often abused sexually, and tortured [Laçiner 2010].

    Another striking example demonstrating that the PKK is not pursuing Kurdish interests, but its own interests, is the alliance with Armenian nationalist organizations, the ASALA in the 1980s, the Armenian Revolutionary Federation [Minassian 2002, pp. 74, 108-109, 116 and 194], the Hunchak, and some others, including in Armenia itself, up to today [Tanu and Abidelli 2007]. No group butchered more Kurds than the ARF-Dashnak and its volunteers for the Russian army during the World War I [McCarthy 2006, pp. 176-257; Reynolds 2011, pp. 156-159 and 194-197]. Even now, the ARF-Dashnak’s and the Hunchak’s territorial claims against Turkey imply a necessity for ethnic cleansing against the Kurds (as well the Turks) of Kars, Van, Bitlis, and other regions.In October 2009, the openly racist article of Laurent Leylekian, executive director of the Dashnak lobby in Brussels from 2001 to 2009, removed any doubt, if there was any, about what the ARF thinks of the Kurds: no better than the ethnic Turks. The article was removed, as was the website which published it, due to a court case, but the ARF never published the slightest criticism against the racist statement of its former leader.

    Such an alliance, though absurd, is by no means an innovation. Hoybun, in a certain sense the ancestor of the PKK created in the second half of the 1920s, was closely associated with the ARF-Dashnak [Selim 1931 & 2005] — despite the Dashnak crimes being very fresh in the Kurdish memories at the time.

    Conclusion

    The PKK should be presented by any person who believes in democracy and human rights as a gang of criminals, existing by crime, rather than “guerillas” and the even less accurate “freedom fighters”. The PKK used Maoism as well as Islamism, and even racism, as a basis for extremely violent attacks. Its pretention to represent the Kurds is nothing but aninsult to its thousands of Kurdish victims. The pro-PKK should be more systematically considered accomplices of terrorism — following the example of Germany’s Federal Constitutional Court, which banned two pro-PKK newspapers in 1997.

    ———————————————————————————–

    Works cited

    Çağaptay 2007: SonerÇağaptay, “Can the PKK Renounce Violence?,” The Middle East Quarterly, XIV-1, Winter 2007,www.meforum.org/1060/can-the-pkk-renounce-violence

    Haut 1998: www.drmcc.org/IMG/pdf/41b3a420533c6.pdf

    İtil1984 :Turanİtil, “Terrorims in Turkey With Special Consideration of Armenian Terrorism, ” International Terrorism and the Drug Connection, Ankara: Ankara University Press, 1984, pp. 29-47.

    Laçiner 2007: www.usak.org.tr/EN/makale.asp?id=702

    Laçiner 2010: www.usak.org.tr/EN/makale.asp?id=1827

    Libération Bordeaux 2009: www.libebordeaux.fr/libe/2009/01/onze-kurdes-con.html

    McCarthy 2006: Justin McCarthy, Esat Arslan, Cemalettin Taşkıran and Ömer Turan, The Armenian Rebellion at Van, Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 2006.

    Minassian 2002: Gaïdz Minassian, Guerre et terrorisme arméniens, (Paris: Presses universitaires de France), 2002.

    Reynolds 2011 : Michael Reynolds, Shattering Empires. The Clash and Collapse of the Ottoman and Russian Empires, New York-Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.

    State Department Report 2009:www.unhcr.org/refworld/country,,USDOS,,DEU,,4c63b64428,0.html

    Rubin 2008: 

    Selim 1931 &2005 :YavuzSelim (ed.), TaşnakHoybun : Türkiye Cumhuriyet’ine Karşı Ermeni Kürt İttifakının İç Yüzü, (İstanbul : İleri Yayınları), 2005 (first edition, Ankara, 1931).

    Sterling 1981: Claire Sterling, The Terror Network: The Secret War of International Terrorism, (New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston), 1981.

    Tanu and Abidelli 2007: /www.turkishweekly.net/news/52549/-armenia-and-karabakh-support-pkk-terrorism-.html

    Zaman 2010-2011: www.todayszaman.com/news-224788-101-defense-in-kurdish-marks-first-day-of-kck-trial.htmlhttp://www.todayszaman.com/news-248158-pkk-releases-kidnapped-son-soon-after-mayor-quits-ak-party.html

    (*)  Maxime Gauin is a visiting researcher at USAK.

    Turkish Weekly

  • The PKK’s cash register found in Luxembourg

    The PKK’s cash register found in Luxembourg

    For the first time ever, SABAH has now located the Luxembourgbased headquarters of the choice financial company for firms laundering funds to the PKK. The shadow corporation, known as C.I.L. would launder drug profits and then fund weapons and mines headed for Kandil. The company practically acts as the terrorist organization’s ‘cover bank’.

    SABAH is the first in the Turkish press to locate the headquarters of the financial company set up in Luxembourg that provides special liberties to capital owners who launder dirty money according to the PKK‘s special set of rules.
    The C.I.L. cover company collects drug money from the organization’s advocates in Europe and then uses it to fund weapons and mines that are brought into Kandil. The company, which also launders funds to Roj TV, has become the center where the distribution of the PKK terrorist organization’s funds is conducted.

    SABAH TRACKS THEM DOWN
    SABAH’s Private Intelligence Department closely tracked C.I.L. and the companies it is connected with for one month in five different European countries; Germany, France, Belgium, Holland and Luxembourg. Documents regarding the front company C.I.L.’s partnership and capital structure have been handed over to French officials. The company, whose full name is Construction Immobiliere Luxembourgeoise, supposedly deals in construction and real estate, and operates from the address on 6, Place de Nancy, L-2212 Luxemburg.

    It was Turkey’s National Intelligence Agency, MİT, which found the trail first. Researching the source of funds that came into Kandil, MİT then relayed all of the information they had acquired on the PKK terrorist organization’s financial support through international weapons trade to French officials.

    COMPANY HAS SIX PARTNERS
    French judicial authorities tracked the organization’s financial traffic and has detected names in connection to international weapons companies. The phone calls made by the leaders of the organization’s Europe wing were tracked for six months by French police in 2010. French investigating judge Thierry Fragnoli, the man responsible for opening the case against the PKK, tracked the money laundered into the organization to the C.I.L. Company in Luxembourg. Fragnoli’s findings showed that the company consists of a total of six partners. The company has 1.5 million Euros in equity capital. However the French police are currently assessing whether the C.I.L. Company is responsible for transferring a total of 300 million Euro during the year of 2010.

    COMPANIES CHANGE HANDS
    According to the information obtained, the company’s partners and the organization’s European financiers are Mehmet Çetindağ, Mustafa Yıldırım, Abdulbaki Gökalp and Hacı Karakoyun. Each, with 300,000 Euros in capital, are partners to the company. Yıldırım was once the chair of KARSAZ, the International Kurdish Employers Union, which was the former association managing the PKK’s finances. The chairman of C.I.L. is Mehmet Çetindağ. Mustafa Yıldırım is the general secretary while Abdulbaki Gökalp is the accountant.

    SABAH has shown images of Çetindağ in his villa nearby Paris. Our crew has also managed to capture footage of Gökalp. Retried former General Chief of Staff İlker Başbuğ has previously stated, “The most significant strength the PKK’s European wing has is economic. If the funds are cut off the armed wing will face difficulties.”
    THE COMPANY ALSO HAS FOREIGN PARTNERS
    The front company set up by the PKK’s European wing leaders also has a number of foreign partners. The organization’s very own cash register, the C.I.L. firm has two foreign partners, Claudi Buffa and Henri Jean Marie Bovy. It is claimed that the foreign partners were added to the ‘staff’ in order to mask the company’s activities. The PKK terrorist organization has used foreign nationals in previously set up shadow companies for the very same reason.
    A change in strategy
    The reason why the organization is using the Luxembourg-based C.I.L. is due to the fact that the PKK has suffered heavy blows in operations conducted in France, Holland and Belgium. In Belgium, PKK members had their assets seized. In the latest operations in France, a number of cars, homes and businesses were confiscated. It was then, from the 2007 period in which Nedim Seven was arrested, when the terrorist organization changed their strategy of financing. All of the money was transferred to the Luxembourg-based C.I.L. Company coupled by the selling of all real estate in France to the firm. With this company, the organization’s European wing is able to continue all financial affairs, to obstruct a halt to the money laundering traffic, and to transfer funds to weapons companies, all vitally important functions for the PKK’s Kandil wing. The revenue brought in from companies is known to be organized more so by the PKK’s European wing Sabri Ok, known for his close affiliation to Abdullah Öcalan.

    Sabah