Tag: Pipa

  • ACTA Copyright Treaty Sparks Protests In Latest Anti-Piracy Battle

    ACTA Copyright Treaty Sparks Protests In Latest Anti-Piracy Battle

    (SOPA Nedir: https://www.turkishnews.com/tr/content/2012/01/19/istiklal-marsinin-sopasi-yok/

    In the United States, a massive Internet protest last week led by Wikipedia and Google drove congressional leaders to place controversial anti-piracy legislation on hold.

    r ACTA PIRACY TREATY large570

    Polish lawmakers from the leftist Palikot’s Movement cover their faces with masks as they protest against ACTA during a parliament session in Warsaw on Jan. 26, 2012.

    But in other parts of the world, another proposal to increase copyright enforcement is gaining momentum, despite protests from opponents concerned about Internet censorship.

    On Thursday, the European Union and 22 of its member states signed the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement, or ACTA — a major step toward enforcement of the copyright treaty. Eight countries, including the United States, had signed the agreement this past fall.

    ACTA has always been controversial because the international negotiations that began in 2007 took place in secret. But now, opponents of the treaty have developed new muscle after witnessing the success of the Internet outcry against the two U.S. bills, the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and the Protect IP Act (PIPA).

    In Poland, hundreds took to the streets this week to protest the government’s intention to sign ACTA. Several popular Polish websites replaced their regular content with statements expressing concerns about ACTA, and government websites were taken offline in an apparent denial-of-service attack coordinated by the hacker group Anonymous.

    For copyright holders, an international treaty may offer fewer roadblocks to combating digital piracy, critics say. While SOPA and PIPA sought to change U.S. law by forcing American Internet service providers to block domain names of websites believed to be engaging in online piracy, ACTA seeks to implement existing U.S. copyright law in countries where copyright enforcement is less stringent. The Obama administration has argued that ACTA does not require Senate authorization because it’s technically an “executive agreement.”

    But U.S. Sen. Ron Wyden wrote a letter to President Barack Obama last fall raising questions about whether it was constitutional for the U.S. trade representative to sign on to the treaty without Senate approval.

    Sean Flynn, a professor of intellectual property law at American University, said ACTA is not as “draconian” as the pending U.S. legislation, calling the treaty “SOPA light.” Some of its most troubling measures — such as a requirement that Internet service providers suspend service to customers caught downloading copyrighted works, known as the “three strikes” rule — have been stripped from the agreement, he said.

    But other experts argue that ACTA is still problematic.

    “ACTA contains new potential obligations for Internet intermediaries, requiring them to police the Internet and their users, which in turn pose significant concerns for citizens’ privacy, freedom of expression, and fair use rights,” Eva Galperin of the Electronic Frontier Foundation wrote in a blog post last fall.

    Many of those who support the U.S. legislation are also backing ACTA, including the Motion Picture Association of America. ACTA is “an important step forward in strengthening international cooperation and enforcement for intellectual property rights,” said former U.S. Sen. Christopher Dodd, chairman of the MPAA, in a statement last fall.

    ACTA is not the only anti-piracy treaty raising concerns. Some experts fear the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) may include intellectual property measures more restrictive than those in ACTA. But public information about the latter treaty is vague because it is also being negotiated in secret, experts say.

    “We don’t know what’s in the TPP IP chapter, and that’s what worries us,” the Electronic Frontier Foundation wrote on its website.

    Flynn said the impact of last week’s protests against SOPA and PIPA has forced the world to pay more attention to these copyright treaties.

    “There have been protests with ACTA, but they’ve never reached this scale,” said Flynn. “The politics seem to be changing on this issue internationally.”

    via ACTA Copyright Treaty Sparks Protests In Latest Anti-Piracy Battle.

  • US government hits Megaupload with mega piracy indictment

    US government hits Megaupload with mega piracy indictment

    Mega upload policeSeven executives charged as filesharing site shut down over accusations they cheated copyright holders out of $500m

    • Explainer: a guide to understanding Sopa
    • Clay Shirky: Pipa would create a consumption-only web

    The US government has closed down one of the world’s largest filesharing websites, accusing its founders of racketeering, money laundering and presiding over “massive” online piracy.

    According to prosecutors, Megaupload illegally cheated copyright holders out of $500m in revenue as part of a criminal enterprise spanning five years.

    A lawyer for Megaupload told the Guardian it would “vigorously” defend itself against the charges, dismissing the criminal action as “a civil case in disguise”.

    News of the indictment – being framed as one of the biggest copyright cases in US history – came a day after major internet firms held a 24-hour protest over proposed anti-piracy laws.

    According to a Department of Justice release, seven people associated with Megaupload were indicted by a federal grand jury earlier this month over the charges.

    They included Kim Dotcom, founder of the online firm.

    The 37-year-old, who also goes by Kim Tim Jim Vestor and whose real name is Kim Schmitz, is accused of heading up a criminal venture that earn Dotcom and his associates upwards of $175m.

    These profits were obtained illegally through advertising and the selling of premium memberships to users of Megaupload, the justice department is claiming.

    Established in 2005, the website offered a “one-click” upload, providing an easily accessible online locker for shared content.

    Before being shut down, the firm boasted 50 million daily visitors, accounting for 4% of total internet traffic, the justice department claimed in its statement on the indictment.

    Prosecutors allege that the website violated copyright law by illegally hosting movies, music and TV shows on a massive scale.

    Those behind the website have claimed that it diligently responds to any complaint regarding pirated material.

    But according to prosecutors, the accused conspirators deliberately employed a business model that encouraged the uploading of illegal material.

    They say that Megaupload paid users for uploading pirated material in full awareness that they were breaking the law. In addition they failed to close the accounts of known copyright infringers.

    The indictment includes chat logs with conversations between company executives, which include statements like: “we have a funny business . . . modern days pirates :)”

    Alongside Dotcom, law enforcement officials swooped on a number of other senior members of Megaupload’s staff.

    Arrests were made at a number of homes in Auckland, New Zealand, on warrants issued by US authorities.

    In all, addresses in nine countries including the US were raided as part of massive international operation.

    Three men accused alongside Dotcom remained on the run tonight, the Department of Justice said.

    About $50m dollars in assets were seized as part of the massive operation.

    Meanwhile, the Megaupload website was closed down, with the FBI seizing an additional 18 domain names associated with the alleged crime.

    In response to the indictment, the hacker group Anonymous, which is ostensibly unaffiliated with Megaupload, launched a cyber attack that at least temporarily brought down the websites of the justice department as well as those of the Recording Industry Association of America, Motion Picture Association of America, and Universal Music.

    If found guilty of the charges, the accused Megaupload executives could face 50 years behind bars.

    Ira Rothken, an attorney for Megaupload, said the firm would fight the “erroneous” charges.

    Speaking from his California office, Rothken said: “The allegations appear to be incorrect and the law does not support the charges.”

    He added: “It is a civil case in disguise.”

    Asked why it was being pursued as a criminal case, Rothken replied: “You’d have to ask the prosecutors.”

     

     

    The Guardian