Tag: Ottoman

  • Os(th)man S(th)inking

    Os(th)man S(th)inking

    Where does the word Ottoman come from?

    Do you remember this commercial with a German coast guard on his first day who receives an SOS message by radio saying: “Help us we are sinking”. The German coast guard answers back: “Vat are you tinking about?”

    Osman is a Turkish name and Osmanlı was the name of the empire ruled by Osman’s family.

    Ottoman script was etymological just like English, unlike the Modern Turkish script which is phonological, that is written just as pronounced. Osman is actually spelled in Ottoman Turkish as Othman. It’s read as Osman while written as Othman. Just like reading “asthma” as “asma”.

    “th” is pronounced like an “s” in Persian and Ottoman Turkish, while it is pronounced as a “t” like people in the Italic Peninsula opted for in the Middle Ages for the name Othman.

    Voiceless “th” is a dental fricative and the closest to that is either the voiceless coronal sibilant “s” or the voiceless dental plosive sound “t”.

    Where does the word Ottoman come from?

    Ottoman script was etymological just like English and Osman was actually written as Othman in Ottoman Turkish.

  • Which ottoman sultan has the most tragic story?

    Which ottoman sultan has the most tragic story?

    Murad V had a tragic, yet morbidly funny one.

    It was the year of 1876, and displeasure with the reign of Sultan Abdülaziz was mounting. His vast expenditures upon the Ottoman Navy(which by then had become the third strongest navy in the world) combined with a drought three years ago had brought the Ottoman finances to a limit and led the Porte to declare a sovereign default on 1875. Tax increases to pay off debts had triggered the Great Eastern Crisis in the Balkans. A group of ministers, officers, and other accomplices finally planned to depose him in a coup, and crown in his stead his nephew, Murad, who was aligned with them politically, a liberal-minded Francophile interested in reforming the Empire along constitutional lines. The coup was planned and Murad was informed: Abdülaziz would be deposed on 31 May 1876.

    In the preparation for the coup, however, a decision was made. It would be made one day earlier, on 30 May. However, they forgot to inform Murad.

    Murad was awakened by a group of men on his door, sent there to take him to coronation. However, the date change was unbeknownst to him. For Murad, there could be only one explanation for why a group of men were at his door one day before the planned coup. The coup had been exposed. His uncle’s men were there to take him. The only likely outcome for him would be execution.

    Never a man of stout mental fortitude, Murad had a panic attack. When the men sent to take him to his coronation entered, they found him severely unhinged.

    Murad V did not recover. Sitting atop the throne of his uncle, he lived in a state of ever-declining mental health, oftentimes in panic. The mad sultan was finally dethroned on grounds of his inability to rule after a 93 day reign, to be replaced by his half-brother, Abdülhamid II.

    All because of one day.

    Cem Arslan
    Amateur military historian and fiction writer

  • Ottoman prince may enter politics

    Ottoman prince may enter politics

    Ottoman prince may enter politics

    There are rumors that the grandson of the Ottoman Sultan Abdulhamid II is about to enter politics in a bid to become the mayor of Istanbul.

    osmanli-torunu-istanbula-aday-oluyor13812004690-h1082930

    World Bulletin / News Desk

    The head of Turkey’s Great Union Party (BBP), Mustafa Destici, has made a very controversial announcement, indicating that Kayihan Osmanoglu, the grandson of the Ottoman Sultan Abdulhamid II, is about to enter politics.

    The announcement came during the BBP’s 6th Kocaeli Congress meeting. Although he admitted that this was not yet a reality, he claimed that there are many people who are calling on him to run for the position of mayor of Istanbul.

    When asked about rumors of the Ottoman prince’s wish to be the first member of the Ottoman royal family to enter politics since the fall of the Ottoman Empire, Destici said ‘Kayihan and myself share a very special friendship. In Istanbul there are people calling on him to step up. However, we have not discussed this issue yet.’

    Destici went on to say that the party will soon reveal the candidates for the upcoming local elections, and many believe that Kayihan Osmanoglu will be among the names.

    via Ottoman prince may enter politics | Politics | World Bulletin.

  • Why you can never get bored of Turkey’s agenda

    Why you can never get bored of Turkey’s agenda

    Turkey is a country that could be a goldmine for any journalist. The agenda of the country is full of such a wide range of issues that even a seasoned Turkish observer can be overwhelmed, let alone a foreigner. This also makes Turkey an interesting case to follow. One day we debate the accuracy of a TV series on life in the Ottoman palace following criticism by the prime minister, the next day we find ourselves in the middle of a debate on abortion and even C-sections.

    I’d like to provide you a synopsis of some of the issues that dominated the domestic agenda of Turkey in recent weeks:

    Wise men committees: Hardly anyone could trace this debate to its origins, but all of a sudden Turkey began to discuss the lists of names that could be included in the “wise men” group that could facilitate the settlement process with the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK). Although government members talked vaguely about a suggestion to form such a group to “convince public opinion on the negotiations,” in the prime minister’s terms, and no names have been uttered by any official authority, lists of names appeared in many mainstream newspapers of the country. Among the names that were obviously randomly picked were liberal columnists and Kurdish intellectuals, but also an actor named Kadir Inanir, who is highly irrelevant to the issue. Aside from his one recent comment in favor of peace in an interview, nobody really knows what his contribution could be. When a deputy prime minister finally announced that no names were determined yet, the discussion slowed down. However, in the meantime social media in particular focused on a debate on possible names rather than the details of the process. Given how we handled even the potential formation of such a group, I have strong doubts that it could serve any good. Both the process and the idea of wise men are critical issues that deserve to be discussed with a serious attitude. When formed, the wise men committee should include people that not only intellectuals could welcome, but the overall population could respect and listen to.

    Apology: Just one day after the country witnessed the historic “peace call” at Nevruz (a spring festival particularly celebrated by Kurds in Turkey), Israel’s long-awaited “apology” has come. Barack Obama brokered the peace between Turkey and Israel just before he ended his visit to the latter. Turkey announced that all of its conditions to normalize relations after the fatal Mavi Marmara raid by Israeli forces that ended in the killing of nine Turks in international waters in 2009 were met.

    The “apology” was considered a diplomatic victory of Turkey by many, but a debate has emerged over why Israel actually apologized three years after the incident. Some argue that it was somehow connected to Syria or Iran while Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu dismissed this. Amid these scenarios, something that could probably only happen in Turkey took place on the streets of Ankara. The mayor of the capital from the governing AK Party decorated the streets of Ankara with billboards expressing “gratitude” to Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan on his victory over Netanyahu. This act almost unanimously was considered as an election investment of the mayor to be considered as a candidate by the prime minister in local elections next year while taking its place in the long record of idiosyncrasies in Turkish politics.

    Press freedom: Turkey cannot be considered a fully liberal democracy yet. Accordingly, it has problems in the implementation of laws in interpreting terrorism, which results in the imprisonment of people advocating for the terrorist organizations (this is subject to reform currently). However, it would be an injustice to the country to consider it in the league of China in terms of freedoms.

    I believe the biggest obstacle in the way of complete freedom of press is the media ownership by big business owners. Due to their economic interests in state tenders and all, more often than not owners of the media in Turkey impose an internal censorship on columnists.

    Of course, the intervention of the prime minister in the media and his telling newspaper owners whom to employ is not acceptable either. However, in a country where a businessman calls the prime minister and asks whom to appoint as the editor-in-chief to his newly bought newspapers (Vatan and Milliyet), the burden remains on the shoulders of the latter. Most recently, veteran journalist Hasan Cemal was fired from Milliyet after his final column criticizing the problematic structure of media ownership in Turkey was not published in the paper (it was later published by Internet media). It is still not totally clear whether the prime minister’s criticism of his previous column on the settlement process scared the owner, the Demiroren family, and led to Cemal’s layoff.

    Mosque on Camlica Hill: On Saturday the construction of the long-debated mosque on Camlica Hill started. Despite a project contest, many, including me, argued that a bad copy of an Ottoman mosque on a hill would be a betrayal of the city’s rich heritage.

    Along with the mosque, projects to redesign Taksim Square and a hideous bridge on the Golden Horn are in progress. Even as an Istanbulite, I have no idea who proposes offers and decides on such projects that will leave a permanent mark on the city.

    Anything that will have an impact on a historic city like Istanbul should be decided by a major consensus after careful deliberation of experts and public opinion. However, we live in a system run by “fait accompli” mentality.

  • An Open Letter to Joshua M. Landis

    An Open Letter to Joshua M. Landis

    Attn. Mr. Joshua M. Landis

    University of Oklahoma
    729 Elm Ave., Hester Hall 116
    Norman, OK 73019

    Mr. Joshua Landis;

    I was shocked by your comments during the live program on Al Jazeera International channel at “Inside Syria” debate on 06 April 2013 Saturday evening as you have been saying “When opposition push in Damascus, Syrian army and government supporters and families will escape from Syria, like 3.000.000 Christians fled from Turkey after 1st World War”

    Sir; First of all you have been talking about Syria, what made you comment about the ear after 1st World War? You could give a recent example to the case that was more relevant like Bosnia, like Iraq, like Kosova etc. where they had a civil war.

    Let me remind you, it was not a civil war during 1914-1918 and after during 1918-1922.

    Allied forces did occupy Turkey for 4 years right after 1st World War that led Turks to rage their Independence War and finally they expelled the occupiers from their land!

    I want to know; were you talking about the so called Armenian claims during a civil unrest erupted during Ottoman era? If so that your claim was based on, it was the case which is still not proved and have been occurred during Ottomans before the 1st World War (so the word “Turkey” you used is wrong as well as timing that you have mentioned besides the number you have given).

    If you were talking about 1.000.000-1.500.000 Armenians who had to leave Anatolia to southern territories of Ottomans (today’s Syrian & Lebanon) during 1st World War again cannot be the base for your claims as these Armenians did not escape, they have organized armed gangs called Tashnak Sutyun & Hinchak that were burning Turkish & Kurdish villages and killing the civilian Muslim population and acting as pathfinders and support units to Russians in occupied Eastern Anatolia that time, therefore the Armenians living in Eastern Anatolia (only) were forced to be re-located by the Ottoman government by the law called “Tehcir bill” to prevent Armenians aiding Russians to occupy Anatolia against Ottomans in another term basically in order to prevent Armenians from treason.

    Or were you talking about the Rum “Greek” minority as they have been subject to a population exchange between Turkey and Greece according to an agreement that was reached between Turkey and Greece after Turkish Liberation War (after 1922) where millions of Turks had to leave Greece and come to Turkey while the same way the Greeks in Anatolia have left Turkey and went to Greece… This as well was not an escape.

    So I wish you could explain me who was those 3.000.000 Christians escaping Turkey after 1st World War that you were talking about? When we look at above cases that I have referred to, none of them support you which proves that your comment was irrelevant and since you are a professor, you are not supposed to make your cases on irrelevances. That made me to think; that you are a big anti-Turkish for a reason and you are after fake slogans, lies and bias… If I am wrong please correct me. These are not the qualities of an academic person.

    I strongly protest you for your false statements that you have delivered on above mentioned live TV program about Turkey and Turkish history, and hope that you go back to your books and search more about the recent history of Middle East – Turkey & Balkans after 1st World War era to refresh your mind and perhaps learn some true facts to not to make irrelevant, false and annoying comments again.

    Regards,

    Yusuf Ilker Karaaslan

    T: +974 55688730

    Doha-QATAR

    PS:

    Joshua M. Landis is Associate Professor and Director of the Center for Middle East Studies at the University of Oklahoma. He is a member of the Department of International and Area Studies in the College of International Studies. He is also the President of the Syrian Studies Association.

  • In Bosnia, Turkey brings back a gentle version of the empire

    In Bosnia, Turkey brings back a gentle version of the empire

    TS_0213619011941362511636

    View Photo Gallery — A gentler Ottoman empire: Two Turkish-run universities have opened in Sarajevo, Bosnia’s Ottoman-influenced capital city in recent years, bringing an influx of Turkish students and culture to a predominantly Muslim country still reeling from a brutal ethnic war almost two decades ago.

    By Michael Birnbaum

    SARAJEVO, BOSNIA — Turkey conquered the Balkans five centuries ago. Now Turkish power is making inroads through friendlier means.

    Two Turkish-run universities have opened in Bosnia’s Ottoman-influenced capital in recent years, bringing an influx of Turkish students and culture to a predominantly Muslim country still reeling from a brutal ethnic war almost two decades ago.

    With two universities in Sarajevo and investments in the region, Turkey’s influence grows in the Balkans.

    Turkish investment has expanded across the Balkans, even in Croatia and Serbia, where mostly Christian residents think of the sultans from Constantinople as occupiers, not liberators. Turkey also has helped broker talks between formerly bitter enemies in the Balkans. This growing presence has given Turkey an expanding field of influence in Europe at a time when the country’s prospects of joining the European Union appear dubious.

    “Turkish leaders are working at a new Ottoman empire, a gentle one,” said Amir Zukic, the bureau chief of the Turkish Anadolu news agency’s Sarajevo office, which has expanded in recent months. “Turkey, a former regional power, is trying to come back in a big way.”

    Turkey’s presence in Bosnia was largely dormant during the more than 40 years that the Balkan country was part of communist Yugoslavia, which was not receptive to Turkish religious and historical influences. But during the mid-1990s, as Yugoslavia fell apart, Turkish aid started flowing to the Muslims who make up about half of Bosnia. Since then, Turkish funding has helped reconstruct Ottoman-era monuments that were targets of ethnically motivated destruction.

    Now Turkey’s cultural influence is hard to miss. Turkish dignitaries are frequent visitors to Sarajevo. A grand new Turkish embassy is being built near “sniper alley,” a corridor where, during the three-year siege of the capital city in the war, Bosnian Muslims struggling to go about their daily business were frequently shot at by Serbian snipers stationed on nearby hills. Billboards advertise round-trip flights to Istanbul for the equivalent of $74. And this year, a baroque soap opera based on the life of Suleiman the Magnificent, a 16th-century ruler of the Ottoman Empire, has mesmerized couch potatoes amid Bosnia’s dreary winter.

    Student exchange

    The biggest outposts in Bosnia have been the two Turkish-backed universities, which have mostly Turkish students.

    At the International University of Sarajevo, students who enter the main door of the sunny building that opened two years ago have to pass under the watchful eye of Sultan Meh­med the Conqueror, the Ottoman ruler who introduced Islam to Bosnia in 1463. The private university is backed by Turkish businessmen who are close to Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s political party. The school started in 2004 and has grown to 1,500 students. It is shooting for 5,000, the capacity of its new building.

    Classes are held in English, and there is a Western curriculum heavy on practical subjects such as business and engineering. But both Turkish and Bosnian students say that part of the attraction of the school is the cultural exchange that takes place. Each cohort has to learn the other’s language.

    via In Bosnia, Turkey brings back a gentle version of the empire – The Washington Post.

    More: http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/in-bosnia-turkey-brings-back-a-gentle-version-of-the-empire/2013/03/24/23cf05f8-84e2-11e2-98a3-b3db6b9ac586_story.html