Tag: Occupy Wall Street

  • Wall Street protests go global

    Wall Street protests go global

    Occupy wallDemonstrators worldwide shouted their rage on Saturday against bankers and politicians they accuse of ruining economies and condemning millions to hardship through greed and bad government.

    Galvanized by the Occupy Wall Street movement, the protests began in New Zealand, rippled round the world to Europe and were expected to return to their starting point in New York.

    Most rallies were however small and barely held up traffic. The biggest anticipated was in Rome, where organizers said they believed 100,000 would take part.

    “At the global level, we can’t carry on any more with public debt that wasn’t created by us but by thieving governments, corrupt banks and speculators who don’t give a damn about us,” said Nicla Crippa, 49, who wore a T-shirt saying “enough” as she arrived at the Rome protest.

    “They caused this international crisis and are still profiting from it, they should pay for it.”

    The Rome protesters, including the unemployed, students and pensioners, planned to march through the center, past the Colosseum and finish in Piazza San Giovanni.

    Some 2,000 police were on hand to keep the Rome demonstrators, who call themselves “the indignant ones,” peaceful and to avoid a repeat of the violence last year when students protesting over education policy clashed with police.

    “YES WE CAMP”

    As some 750 buses bearing protesters converged on the capital, students at Rome university warmed up with their own mini-demo on Saturday morning.

    The carried signs reading “Your Money is Our Money,” and “Yes We Camp,” an echo of the slogan “Yes We Can” used by U.S. President Barack Obama.

    In imitation of the occupation of Zuccotti Park near Wall Street in Manhattan, some protesters have been camped out across the street from the headquarters of the Bank of Italy for several days.

    The worldwide protests were a response in part to calls by the New York demonstrators for more people to join them. Their example has prompted calls for similar occupations in dozens of U.S. cities from Saturday.

    Demonstrators in Italy were united in their criticism of Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi and angry at his victory in a vote of confidence in parliament on Friday.

    The government has passed a 60 billion-euro austerity package that has raised taxes and will make public health care more expensive.

    On Friday students stormed Goldman Sachs’s offices in Milan and daubed red graffiti. Others hurled eggs at the headquarters of UniCredit, Italy’s biggest bank.

    New Zealand and Australia got the ball rolling on Saturday. Several hundred people marched up the main street in Auckland, New Zealand’s biggest city, joining a rally at which 3,000 chanted and banged drums, denouncing corporate greed.

    About 200 gathered in the capital Wellington and 50 in a park in the earthquake-hit southern city of Christchurch.

    In Sydney, about 2,000 people, including representatives of Aboriginal groups, communists and trade unionists, protested outside the central Reserve Bank of Australia.

    “REAL DEMOCRACY”

    “I think people want real democracy,” said Nick Carson, a spokesman for OccupyMelbourne.Org, as about 1,000 gathered in the Australian city.

    “They don’t want corporate influence over their politicians. They want their politicians to be accountable.”

    Hundreds marched in Tokyo, including anti-nuclear protesters. In Manila, capital of the Philippines, a few dozen marched on the U.S. embassy waving banners reading: “Down with U.S. imperialism” and “Philippines not for sale.”

    More than 100 people gathered at the Taipei stock exchange, chanting “we are Taiwan’s 99 percent,” and saying economic growth had only benefited companies while middle-class salaries barely covered soaring housing, education and healthcare costs.

    They found support from a top businessman, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Corp (TSMC) Chairman Morris Chang.

    “I’ve been against the gap between rich and poor,” Chang said in the northern city of Hsinchu. “The wealth of the top one percent has increased very fast in the past 20 or 30 years. ‘Occupy Wall Street’ is a reaction to that.”

    Demonstrators aimed to converge on the City of London under the banner “Occupy the Stock Exchange.”

    “We have people from all walks of life joining us every day,” said Spyro, one of those behind a Facebook page in London which has drawn some 12,000 followers.

    The 28-year-old, who said he had a well-paid job and did not want to give his full name, said the target of the protests as “the financial system.”

    Angry at taxpayer bailouts of banks since 2008 and at big bonuses still paid to some who work in them while unemployment blights the lives of many young Britons, he said: “People all over the world, we are saying: ‘Enough is enough’.”

    Greek protesters called an anti-austerity rally for Saturday in Athens’ Syntagma Square.

    “What is happening in Greece now is the nightmare awaiting other countries in the future. Solidarity is the people’s weapon,” the Real Democracy group said in a statement calling on people to join the protest.

    In Paris protests were expected to coincide with the G20 finance chiefs’ meeting there. In Madrid, seven marches were planned to unite in Cibeles square at 1600 GMT (12 p.m. EDT) and then march to the central Puerta de Sol.

    In Germany, where sympathy for southern Europe’s debt troubles is patchy, the financial center of Frankfurt and the European Central Bank in particular are expected to be a focus of marches called by the Real Democracy Now movement.

    Reuters

  • Financial Giants Put New York City Cops On Their Payroll

    Financial Giants Put New York City Cops On Their Payroll

    Who Do the White Shirt Police Report to at Occupy Wall Street Protests?
    by PAM MARTENS

    Videos are springing up across the internet showing uniformed members of the New York Police Department in white shirts (as opposed to the typical NYPD blue uniforms) pepper spraying and brutalizing peaceful, nonthreatening protestors attempting to take part in the Occupy Wall Street marches.  Corporate media are reporting that these white shirts are police supervisors as opposed to rank and file.  Recently discovered documents suggest something else may be at work.

    If you’re a Wall Street behemoth, there are endless opportunities to privatize profits and socialize losses beyond collecting trillions of dollars in bailouts from taxpayers.  One of the ingenious methods that has remained below the public’s radar was started by the Rudy Giuliani administration in New York City in 1998.  It’s called the Paid Detail Unit and it allows the New York Stock Exchange and Wall Street corporations, including those repeatedly charged with crimes, to order up a flank of New York’s finest with the ease of dialing the deli for a pastrami on rye.

    The corporations pay an average of $37 an hour (no medical, no pension benefit, no overtime pay) for a member of the NYPD, with gun, handcuffs and the ability to arrest.  The officer is indemnified by the taxpayer, not the corporation.

    New York City gets a 10 percent administrative fee on top of the $37 per hour paid to the police.  The City’s 2011 budget called for $1,184,000 in Paid Detail fees, meaning private corporations were paying  wages of $11.8 million to police participating in the Paid Detail Unit.  The program has more than doubled in revenue to the city since 2002.

    The taxpayer has paid for the training of the rent-a-cop, his uniform and gun, and will pick up the legal tab for lawsuits stemming from the police personnel following illegal instructions from its corporate master.  Lawsuits have already sprung up from the program.

    When the program was first rolled out, one insightful member of the NYPD posted the following on a forum: “… regarding the officer working for, and being paid by, some of the richest people and organizations in the City, if not the world, enforcing the mandates of the private employer, and in effect, allowing the officer to become the Praetorian Guard of the elite of the City. And now corruption is no longer a problem. Who are they kidding?”

    Just this year, the Department of Justice revealed serious problems with the Paid Detail unit of the New Orleans Police Department.  Now corruption probes are snowballing at NOPD, revealing cash payments to police in the Paid Detail and members of the department setting up limited liability corporations to run upwards of $250,000 in Paid Detail work billed to the city.

    When the infamously mismanaged Wall Street firm, Lehman Brothers, collapsed on September 15, 2008, its bankruptcy filings in 2009 showed it owed money to 21 members of the NYPD’s Paid Detail Unit.  (A phone call and email request to the NYPD for information on which Wall Street firms participate in the program were not responded to.  The police unions appear to have only scant information about the program.)

    Other Wall Street firms that are known to have used the Paid Detail include Goldman Sachs, the World Financial Center complex which houses financial firms, and the New York Stock Exchange.

    The New York Stock Exchange is the building in front of which the Occupy Wall Street protesters have unsuccessfully tried to protest, being herded behind metal barricades, clubbed with night sticks, kicked in the face and carted off to jail rather than permit the last plantation in America to be defiled with citizen chants and posters.  (A sample of those politically inconvenient posters and chants: “The corrupt are afraid of us; the honest support us; the heroic join us”; “Tell me what democracy looks like, this is what democracy looks like”; “I’ll believe a corporation is a person when Texas executes one.” The last sign refers to the 2010 U.S. Supreme Court decision, Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, giving corporations First Amendment personhood, which allows them to spend unlimited amounts of money in elections.)

    On September 8, 2004, Robert Britz, then President and Co-Chief Operating Officer of the New York Stock Exchange, testified as follows to the U.S. House Committee on Financial Services:

     “…we have implemented new hiring standards requiring former law enforcement or military backgrounds for the security staff…We have established a 24-hour NYPD Paid Detail monitoring the perimeter of the data centers…We have implemented traffic control and vehicle screening at the checkpoints. We have installed fixed protective planters and movable vehicle barriers.”

    Military backgrounds; paid NYPD 24-7; checkpoints; vehicle barriers?  It might be insightful to recall that the New York Stock Exchange originally traded stocks with a handshake under a Buttonwood tree in the open air on Wall Street.

    In his testimony, the NYSE executive Britz states that “we” did this or that while describing functions that clearly belong to the City of New York.  The New York Stock Exchange at that time had not yet gone public and was owned by those who had purchased seats on the exchange – primarily, the largest firms on Wall Street.   Did the NYSE simply give itself police powers to barricade streets and set up checkpoints with rented cops?  How about clubbing protesters on the sidewalk?

    Just six months before NYSE executive Britz’ testimony to a congressional committee, his organization was being sued in the Supreme Court of New York County for illegally taking over public streets with no authority to do so. This action had crippled the business of a parking garage, Wall Street Garage Parking Corp., the plaintiff in the case.  Judge Walter  Tolub said in his opinion that

    “…a private entity, the New York Stock Exchange, has assumed responsibility for the patrol and maintenance of truck blockades located at seven intersections surrounding the NYSE…no formal authority appears to have been given to the NYSE to maintain these blockades and/or conduct security searches at these checkpoints…the closure of these intersections by the NYSE is tantamount to a public nuisance…The NYSE has yet to provide this court with any evidence of an agreement giving them the authority to maintain the security perimeter and/or conduct the searches that their private security force conducts daily.  As such, the NYSE’s actions are unlawful and may be enjoined as they violate plaintiff’s civil rights as a private citizen.”

    The case was appealed, the ruling overturned, and sent back to the same Judge who had no choice but to dismiss the case on the appellate ruling that the plaintiff had suffered no greater harm than the community at large.  Does everyone in lower Manhattan own a parking garage that is losing its customer base because the roads are blocked to the garage?

    Some believe that Wall Street is given special privileges and protection because New York City’s Mayor Michael Bloomberg owes his $18.1 billion in wealth (yes, he’s that 1 percent the 99 percent are protesting) to Wall Street.  The Mayor was previously a trader for Salomon Brothers, the investment bank made famous for attempting to rig the U.S. Treasury market in two-year notes.

    The Mayor’s business empire which bears his name, includes the awesome Bloomberg terminal, a computer that houses enormous pricing data for stocks and bonds, research, news, charting functions and much more.  There are currently an estimated 290,000 of these terminals on Wall Street trading floors around the globe, generating approximately $1500 in rental fees per terminal per month.  That’s a cool $435 million a month or $5.2 billion a year, the cash cow of the Bloomberg businesses.

    The Bloomberg businesses are run independently from the Mayor but he certainly knows that his terminal is a core component of his wealth.  Nonetheless, the Mayor is not Wall Street’s patsy.  Bloomberg Publishing is frequently in the forefront of exposing fraud on Wall Street such as the 2001 tome “The Pied Pipers of Wall Street” by Benjamin Mark Cole,  which exposed the practice of releasing fraudulent stock research to the public.  Bloomberg News was responsible for court action that forced the Federal Reserve to release the details of what it did with trillions of dollars in taxpayer bailouts to Wall Street firms, hedge funds and foreign banks.

    Police Commissioner Ray Kelly may also have a soft spot for Wall Street.  He was formerly Senior Managing Director of Global Corporate Security at Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc., the Wall Street firm that collapsed into the arms of JPMorgan in March of 2008.

    There has also been a bizarre revolving door between the Wall Street millionaires and the NYPD at times.  One of the most puzzling career moves was made by Stephen L. Hammerman.  He left a hefty compensation package as Vice Chairman of Merrill Lynch & Co. in 2002 to work as Deputy Commissioner of Legal Matters for the NYPD from 2002 to 2004.  That move had everyone on Wall Street scratching their head at the time.  Merrill collapsed into the arms of Bank of America on September 15, 2008, the same date that Lehman went under.

    Wall Street is not the only sector renting cops in Manhattan.  Department stores, parks, commercial banks and landmarks like Rockefeller Center, Jacob Javits Center and St. Patrick’s Cathedral have also participated in the Paid Detail Unit, according to insiders.  But Wall Street is the only sector that runs a private justice system where its crimes are herded off to secret arbitration tribunals, has sucked on the public teat to the tune of trillions of dollars, escaped prosecution for the financial collapse, and can put an armed municipal force on the sidewalk to intimidate public protestors seeking a realignment of their democracy.

    We may be learning a lot more in the future about the tactics Wall Street and the NYPD have deployed against the Occupy Wall Street protestors.  The highly regarded Partnership for Civil Justice Fund has filed a class action lawsuit over the approximately 700 arrests made on the Brooklyn Bridge on October 1.  The formal complaint and related information is  available at the organization’s web site, www.JusticeOnLine.org.

    The organization was founded by Carl Messineo and Mara Verheyden-Hilliard.  The Washington Post has called them “the constitutional sheriffs for a new protest generation.”

    The suit names Mayor Bloomberg, Police Commissioner Kelly, the City of New York, 30 unnamed members of the NYPD, and, provocatively, 10 unnamed law enforcement officers not employed by the NYPD.

    The lawsuit lays out  dwhat has been curtailing the constitutional rights of protestors for a very long time in New York City.

    “As seen in the movements for social change in the Middle East and Europe, all movements for social justice, jobs, and democracy need room to breathe and grow and it is imperative that there be a halt to law enforcement actions used to shut down mass assembly and free expression of the people seeking to redress grievances…

    “After escorting and leading a group of demonstrators and others well out onto the Brooklyn Bridge roadway, the NYPD suddenly and without warning curtailed further forward movement, blocked the ability of persons to leave the Bridge from the rear, and arrested hundreds of protestors in the absence of probable cause.  This was a form of entrapment, both illegal and physical.

    “That the trap and detain mass arrest was a command-level-driven intentional and calculated police operation is evidenced by the fact that the law enforcement officials who led the demonstration across the bridge were command officials, known as ‘white shirts.’ ”

    In April 2001, I was arrested and incarcerated by the NYPD while peacefully handing out flyers on a public sidewalk outside of the Citigroup shareholders meeting – flyers that warned of growing corruption inside the company. (The unlawful merger of Travelers Group and Citibank created Citigroup and resulted in the repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act, the depression era investor protection legislation that barred depositor banks from merging with high-risk Wall Street firms.  Many of us from social justice groups in New York City had protested against the repeal but were out maneuvered by Wall Street’s political pawns in Washington.)

    Out of a group of about two dozen protestors from the National Organization for Women in New York City, Rain Forest Action Network, and Inner City Press, I was the only person arrested.  There was no civil disobedience occurring.  Rain Forest Action Network was handing out fortune cookies with prescient warnings about Citigroup and urging pedestrians to cut up their Citibank credit cards.  The rest of us were peacefully handing out flyers.

    Chained to a metal bar inside the police precinct, I was grilled on any crimes I might know about.  I responded that the only crimes I knew about were listed on the flyer and apparently, in New York City, one gets arrested for disclosing crimes by Wall Street firms.

    A mysterious, mature, white shirted inspector who ordered my arrest on the sidewalk, and refused to give his first name, disappeared from the police report when it was filed, blaming the arrest instead on a young police officer.  Citigroup is only alive today because the Federal government inserted a feeding tube into Citigroup and infused over $2 trillion in loans, direct investment and guarantees as the company veered toward collapse.

    The NYPD at the time of my arrest was run by Bernard Kerik – the man President George W. Bush later sent to Iraq to be the interim Interior Minister and train Iraqi police.  The President subsequently nominated Kerik to head the Department of Homeland Security for the entire nation.  The nation was spared of that eventuality only because of an illegal nanny popping up.  Today, Kerik is serving a four year sentence in Federal prison for a variety of criminal acts.

    The New York Civil Liberties Union filed a Federal lawsuit on my behalf  (Martens v. Giuliani) and we learned that the NYPD had arbitrarily established a policy to arrest and hold for 72 hours any person protesting in a group of 20 or more.   The case was settled for a modest monetary award and the repeal by the NYPD of this unconstitutional and despicable practice.

    Pam Martens worked on Wall Street for 21 years. She spent the last decade of her career advocating against Wall Street’s private justice system, which keeps its crimes shielded from public courtrooms.  She has been writing on public interest issues for CounterPunch since retiring in 2006.   She has no security position, long or short, in any company mentioned in this article.  She can be reached at pamk741@aol.com 

    www.counterpunch.org, OCTOBER 10, 2011

  • Police crack down on ‘Occupy Wall Street’ protests

    Police crack down on ‘Occupy Wall Street’ protests

    Corporate States of America

    Matt Wells

    New York police accused of heavy-handed tactics as 80 anti-capitalist protesters on ‘Occupy Wall Street’ march are arrested

    Participants in the Occupy Wall Street
    The Occupy Wall Street protests. Photograph: Tina Fineberg/AP

    The anti-capitalist protests that have become something of a fixture in Lower Manhattan over the past week or so have taken on a distinctly ugly turn.

    Police have been accused of heavy-handed tactics after making 80 arrests on Saturday when protesters marched uptown from their makeshift camp in a private park in the financial district.

    Footage has emerged on YouTube showing stocky police officers coralling a group of young female protesters and then spraying them with mace, despite being surrounded and apparently posing threats of only the verbal kind.

    YouTube footage of protesters being pepper-sprayed

    NYPD officers strung orange netting across the streets to trap groups of protesters, a tactic described by some of them as “kettling” – a term more commonly used by critics of a similar tactic deployed by police in London to contain potentially violent demonstrations there.

    The media here in New York has been accused of being slow off the mark to cover the demonstrations, which have been going on for more than a week.

    Here are some links to our coverage over the past week.

    • This is a gallery of photographs taken by John Stuttle last weekend.
    • Karen McVeigh visited the camp in Zuccotti Park on Monday
    • Later in the week, Paul Harris recorded video interviews with some of the protesters.

    Now, however, the local media has paid more attention – almost certainly because Saturday’s protest became disruptive, bringing chaos to the busy Union Square area and forcing the closure of streets.

    The New York Times quoted one protester, Kelly Brannon, 27, of Ridgewood, Queens:

    They put up orange nets and tried to kettle us and we started running and they started tackling random people and handcuffing them. They were herding us like cattle.

    The scenes are showing signs of attracting high-profile criticism. Anne-Marie Slaughter, who was director of policy planning, at the State Department from 2009 to 2011, said on Twitter: “Not the image or reality the US wants, at home or abroad,” linking to a picture of a police officer kneeling on a protester pinned to the ground.

    Here’s an extract from a Reuters report, which said the demonstrators were protesting against “bank bailouts, the mortgage crisis and the US state of Georgia’s execution of Troy Davis”.

    At Manhattan’s Union Square, police tried to corral the demonstrators using orange plastic netting. Some of the arrests were filmed and activists posted the videos online.

    Police say the arrests were mostly for blocking traffic. Charges include disorderly conduct and resisting arrest. But one demonstrator was charged with assaulting a police officer. Police say the officer involved suffered a shoulder injury.

    Protest spokesman Patrick Bruner criticized the police response as “exceedingly violent” and said the protesters sought to remain peaceful

    And this is a fuller take from Associated Press.

    The marchers carried signs spelling out their goals: “Tax the rich,” one placard said. “We Want Money for Healthcare not Corporate Welfare,” read another.

    The demonstrators were mostly college-age people carrying American flags and signs with anti-corporate slogans. Some beat drums, blew horns and chanted slogans as uniformed officers surrounded and videotaped them.

    “Occupy Wall Street,” they chanted, “all day, all week.”

    Organizers fell short of that goal. With metal barricades and swarms of police officers in front of the New York Stock Exchange, the closest protesters could get was Liberty Street, about three blocks away.

    The Vancouver-based activist media group Adbusters organized the weeklong event. Word spread via social media, yet the throngs of protesters some participants had hoped for failed to show up.

    “I was kind of disappointed with the turnout,” said Itamar Lilienthal, 19, a New York University student and marcher.

    Update: 11.30am ET Sunday

     

    In the comments, there has been some debate about my description of the protesters as “anti-capitalist”. Some commenters say this description is inaccurate.

    Here’s a typical comment, from kismequik:

    The Occupy Wall Street protest isn’t anti-capitalist – it’s anti-unregulated capitalism.

    And another, from NatalieNY:

    I am disappointed to find you referring to this protest as anti-capitalist which has a negative and alienating connotation, and which is a dangerously false label.

    This is about our broken system and taking our government back to a place of being about and for the people, not corporate interests.

    Other commenters point out more media coverage today, including a front-page piece in the New York Daily News.

    www.guardian.co.uk, 25 September 2011

  • Yahoo Apologizes for Accidentally Blocking Emails Containing Links to OccupyWallSt.org

    Yahoo Apologizes for Accidentally Blocking Emails Containing Links to OccupyWallSt.org

    YahooYahoo email users hoping to spread the word of the Occupy Wall Street protests ran into an unforseen obstacle on Tuesday when their messages containing links to the website occupywallst.org were blocked from being sent because an online filter deemed them “suspicious activity.”

    Although several Yahoo users and media outlets jumped to the conclusion that Yahoo was deliberately censoring the emails due on the basis of the anti-establishment content, the company quickly responded via Twitter, saying that “It was not intentional & caught by our spam filters. It is resolved, but may be a residual delay.”

    The company also thanked the blog Think Progress for bringing the matter to their attention via a post on the subject.

    The anti-corporate protests organized by progressive magazine Adbusters and endorsed and heavily promoted by the hacktivist collective Anonymous have been raging in New York’s financial district since Saturday. So far, seven protesters have been arrested, five of them for wearing masks, a violation of an antique anti-mask law on the city’s books.

    But supporters of the demonstration, who have relied on social media to get their messages across and rally others to their cause, hardly expected that their email service would fail them at such a critical time.

    At the same time, Yahoo has raised the ire of free speech advocates before for its cooperation with the Chinese government in censoring search results on the Chinese mainland. Yahoo has also blocked links to file-sharing search engines such as FilesTube through its Yahoo Messenger service.

    See the errant filter in action in the YouTube video below, as demonstrated by a Yahoo user.


    Late update: Yahoo responds to Idea Lab via email, asserting that the problem was actually first observed and reported yesterday and has since been corrected. “Unfortunately, the domain ‘occupywallst.org’ was being caught by one of our spam filters when some users tried to send messages containing it. This was a false positive which we corrected yesterday. However, there may still be residual delay (up to 24 hours) for users trying to send emails with that phrase. Thank you to the Yahoo! Mail users who notified us about this.”

    idealab.talkingpointsmemo.com, September 20, 201

  • “OCCUPY WALL STREET PROTEST”, TOTAL MEDIA BLACKOUT

    “OCCUPY WALL STREET PROTEST”, TOTAL MEDIA BLACKOUT

    Speaker: We’re going to make our own Tahrir square here

    OCCUPY WALL STREET PROTEST

    Speaker
    Speaker: We're going to make our own Tahrir square here
    The Corrupt Fear Us
    The corrupt fear us. The honest support us. The heroic join us.

    AT LEAST 70,000 AND COUNTING… BIG MEDIA BLACKOUT “Occupy Wall Street”

    10 questions about “Occupy Wall Street” that should be answered urgently:

    1. Why are peaceful protesters being treated as if they are criminals?

    2. Why are thousands of police, and SWAT teams and police dogs, being mobilized to protect Wall Street bankers?

    3. Why are almost all the mainstream media outlets in America ignoring a major civil protest in the heart of New York?

    4. Why do the police not pursue criminal bankers and business leaders with the same venom and force that they use when pursuing protesters who have so far done nothing wrong?

    5. Why is nothing being done to address the genuine economic problems in America? Why, instead, is the old system – the one that failed disastrously in 2008 – being rebuilt brick by brick, fault by fault?

    6. How much longer will the doctrine of ‘plausible denial’ be allowed to act as an excuse for widespread corruption and criminality?

    7. Why (if true) was the Occupy Wall Street protest treated as a police code 1-34, which is used for riots? Are all protests now riots?

    8. Why has not one banker or corporate leader emerged to talk to the protesters or debate with them?

    9. Is it a coincidence that many people in the heart of the protest have had trouble getting mobile / cellphone / internet signals?

    10. Does the government genuinely believe the pent-up anger and frustration will simply go away?

    David Wendt ⋅ September 17, 2011

    #OccupyWallStreet #takewallstreet

    The Bull is in China Shop

    Aljazeera Coverage:

    LIVE Stream:

    LIVE Stream 2:

    LIVE Stream 3: