Tag: NATO missile shield

  • Turks Seek Control Over Shield

    Turks Seek Control Over Shield

    Prime Minister Increases Conditions, Says NATO Plan Needs Local Commander

    By MARC CHAMPION

    ISTANBUL—Turkey said it would seek a leading role in a North Atlantic Treaty Organization missile-defense shield if it is to agree to host the system’s radars, ratcheting up its conditions days before a key alliance meeting.

    Turkey would demand that NATO assign a Turkish commander to oversee the shield, Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan said Monday. “Especially if this is to be placed on our soil, [command] definitely should be given to us—otherwise it is not possible to accept,” Mr. Erdogan told journalists at Istanbul’s Ataturk airport on Monday, according to Anadolu Ajansi, Turkey’s state-funded news agency.

    Sharpening his country’s position ahead of a summit of NATO leaders in Lisbon this week, Mr. Erdogan said Turkey’s other top concerns include where the system’s radar sensors would be deployed and where debris from any intercepted missiles would fall. “This will be discussed at the Lisbon summit. If we reach an agreement, that’s great. If not, there’s nothing more to say,” he said.

    Turkey has been in negotiations over the missile shield for weeks, primarily with the U.S., which proposed and would build the system. Starting with existing technology and upgraded in stages, the shield would by 2020 protect Europe and the U.S. from ballistic missile threats from the region.

    The NATO shield has put Turkey’s government in a difficult position. U.S. policies in the region are unpopular in Turkey. Conservative newspapers have worried that hosting the radar could make Turkey a potential first-strike target for anyone planning to launch an attack.

    Turkish leaders also are working hard to avoid being put in a position of having to choose publicly between support for NATO and Iran, an important neighbor and energy supplier that Ankara has been trying to court. On Monday, Mr. Erdogan reiterated Turkey’s top-line condition for its support, namely that an agreement at the summit shouldn’t mention Iran as the threat against which the shield is being built. The U.S. has repeatedly identified Iran as the primary reason for building it.

    nato shield

    A European ambassador to NATO said the Turks have become “difficult” on the missile-defense issue in recent weeks. A U.S. defense official said that in one-on-one meetings with U.S. officials last week, Turkish officials hadn’t requested command of the defense system.

    Diplomats don’t expect Ankara ultimately to block NATO from building the shield, and it was unclear on Monday how much of Mr. Erdogan’s agenda Turkey would push at the Portugal summit. But its position has the potential to put it into conflict with Washington.

    “Negotiations between the allies are still going on and the Turks are obviously playing hardball,” said a NATO official who declined to be identified. The official said discussion at the summit would likely focus on issues “of principle,” including whether to name Iran in the threat assessment and whether the system would cover the entire Turkish territory, as Turkey desires.

    But the official said that most of what Mr. Erdogan referred to Monday—such as in whose hands the system’s command and control would be placed—would likely be negotiated after the summit. That is especially true if Russia also agrees to cooperate with the shield, as the allies hope. Moscow’s involvement would require extensive negotiation, the official said.

    The U.S. defense official said it was “too early to discuss the location of any potential new command infrastructure” until after NATO agrees to pursue a shield system. U.S. officials have said, at least initially, the existing American missile-defense infrastructure is likely to be used by any NATO system.

    Turkey isn’t seeking to have its finger on the shield’s button, according to a senior aide to Mr. Erdogan. The time window for intercepting incoming missiles is also too short to allow for political control, diplomats say, meaning the shield would operate according to rules of engagement set in advance by all NATO members.

    Mr. Erdogan didn’t call for the missile shield’s headquarters to be located in Turkey. Still, Turkey would hope to host the shield’s headquarters, possibly at NATO’s base in Izmir, in Western Turkey, the senior aide said.

    The NATO summit, which runs Friday and Saturday in the Portuguese capital, is also expected to adopt a new strategic concept for the alliance, covering the next 10 years.

    NATO decisions are taken by consensus, meaning that any one of the alliance’s 28 members has power of veto. Last month, Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu said it was “out of the question” for Turkey to oppose a project that NATO sees as necessary for its defense, but he left open whether Turkey would participate by hosting its radars.

    Mr. Davutoglu also said it was essential the shield should cover all of Turkey and that it should not turn Turkey into a frontline state, as during the Cold War, by identifying particular countries as threats.

    A senior Turkish official confirmed Monday that President Abdullah Gul also has sent a letter to alliance leaders stating the Turkish position. Mr. Gul’s office declined to provide details of the letter.

    Turkey is the preferred location for the system’s radars because it shares a border with Iran, according to diplomats familiar with the project. Bulgaria and Romania are also possible radar locations being discussed, these people say. The missile interceptors themselves, meanwhile, would be located at sea in the first phase of the project, in Romania and at sea as of 2015 and in Poland as of 2018, U.S. officials have said.

    Although a NATO project, the defense shield is being proposed by Washington and would be built by the U.S. NATO members would pay an estimated $270 million to integrate the system over 10 years.

    —Stephen Fidler in Brussels and Julian E. Barnes in Washington contributed to this article.Write to Marc Champion at [email protected]

  • Analysis: NATO shield to test Turkey’s allegiances | Reuters

    Analysis: NATO shield to test Turkey’s allegiances | Reuters

    (Reuters) – A U.S.-led plan to build a missile defense shield against Iran will test Turkey’s conflicting allegiances, forcing it to find a way to satisfy NATO allies without alienating new partners to the East.

    Frustrated at “waiting at the gates” of the European Union, and out of step with long time ally the United States on some key foreign policy issues — notably regarding Iran — Muslim Turkey has charted an increasingly independent course.

    NATO member states will discuss at a summit in Lisbon on November 19-20 whether to build the shield, aimed at countering ballistic threats from the Middle East, in particular Iran.

    Turkey, the only Muslim state in NATO, doesn’t want any NATO agreement on the shield to identify as potential enemies either fellow Muslim states Iran and Syria, or Russia. Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan also wants the shield to cover all Turkish territory and seeks guarantees command would stay within NATO.

    Though Turkey is committed to NATO missions such as Afghanistan, it is no longer the compliant partner that it was during the Cold War and cannot be taken for granted by the West.

    “Five years ago Ankara’s choice would have been predictable,” said Semih Idiz, a Turkish foreign policy analyst.

    “It no longer is so and this carries the seeds of another crisis with the U.S. and the EU along the ideological divide.”

    Turkey seeks stable relations with close neighbors which in past decades have proved troublesome. It has an $11 billion trade with major gas supplier Iran, has become a friend of Syria, and it recently signed a “strategic partnership” with traditional foe Russia.

    Turkey’s transformation from a virtual bankrupt shackled by military coups into a stable democracy with one of the world’s fastest growing economies has imbued it with confidence.

    Erdogan, whose core constituency lies among religious Turks knows his assertiveness goes down well with voters who have as little trust in Washington as an average Egyptian or Pakistani.

    DISSONANCE

    Idiz says Erdogan, who has called Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad a good friend, has become a “wild card” — a valued ally of the West whose maverick streak can prove awkward.

    Turkey’s estrangement from Israel added to complications.

    Strategically, Turkey straddles energy corridors to Central Asia and the Middle East, with Iraq, Iran, Syria, and the volatile South Caucasus states on its eastern borders, Russia to the north, and the Balkans to the southwest.

    The United States sees Turkey, a moderate Muslim state with a secular constitution and strengthening democracy, as a bulwark of stability in the conflict-ridden Eurasian region.

    via Analysis: NATO shield to test Turkey’s allegiances | Reuters.

  • Iran Must Not be “Targeted” by Missile Shield, Turkey Says

    Iran Must Not be “Targeted” by Missile Shield, Turkey Says

    Turkish President Abdullah Gul said in an interview aired yesterday that his government would object to a potential NATO missile defense system that identified Iran as a particular threat, Agence France-Presse reported (see GSN, Nov. 1).

    “NATO is a defense organization. A defense system is being developed against anyone in the world who has ballistic missiles and does not belong to NATO,” Gul, whose nations is one of the military alliance’s 28 members, told the BBC.

    Ahead of next week’s summit in Lisbon, Portugal, NATO has yet to formalize the reason for a possible European missile shield. Officials from alliance member states have highlighted Iran in making their case for the system (see GSN, Oct. 15). NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen recently, though, avoided discussing particular threats the shield would be intended to counter (see GSN, Nov. 3).

    “Mentioning one country, Iran … is wrong and will not happen,” said Gul, whose government has warming relations with Tehran. “A particular country will not be targeted. … We will definitely not accept that.”

    NATO states are anticipated to determine at the summit whether to officially include missile defense as a core alliance objective. Doing so would allow the organization to move forward with a plan to enhance and integrate national antimissile systems to provide alliance-wide protection.

    Ankara would like to see the missile defense system provide full coverage to Turkey and not only the territory that is close to Iran, say diplomats (Agence France-Presse/Spacewar.com, Nov. 8).

  • Turkey against Nato missile shield targeting Iran

    Turkey against Nato missile shield targeting Iran

    Mentioning one country, Iran… is wrong and will not happen. A particular country will not be targeted…We will definitely not accept that,” he said in an interview with the BBC’s Turkish service, aired on Turkish television. – Reuters Photo

    Turkey's President Abdullah Gul makes a speech during the opening of the Global Economic Symposium, co-organised by Turkish Central Bank and Germany's Kiel Institute, in Istanbul
    Turkey's President Abdullah Gul makes a speech during the opening of the Global Economic Symposium, co-organised by Turkish Central Bank and Germany's Kiel Institute, in Istanbul

    ANKARA: A Nato missile shield project that singles out Iran as a threat will be unacceptable to Turkey, President Abdullah Gul said in an interview broadcast Monday.

    “Nato is a defence organisation. A defence system is being developed against anyone in the world who has ballistic missiles and does not belong to Nato,” Gul said.

    “Mentioning one country, Iran… is wrong and will not happen. A particular country will not be targeted…We will definitely not accept that,” he said in an interview with the BBC’s Turkish service, aired on Turkish television.

    Nato and the United States want to set up a missile shield to protect Europe against what they perceive is a growing threat of short- and medium-range missiles possibly launched from the Middle East, especially from Iran.

    The issue will be high on the agenda of a Nato summit in Lisbon next week, which will also be attended by Russian President Dmitry Medvedev whose country is suspicious of the project despite assurances that it is not aimed at Russia.

    Turkey, Nato’s sole Muslim-majority member, is worried that the project may deal a blow to ties with its eastern neighbour Iran and Russia, which have notably improved in recent years.

    According to diplomats, Turkey also wants the missile shield to protect all of its territory, and not just areas near the Iranian border.

    The Islamist-rooted government in Ankara has taken a softer line on Tehran’s nuclear programme than Western powers, insisting on a diplomatic solution under a nuclear fuel swap deal that it hammered out with the Islamic republic in May, together with Brazil.

    In a move that irked the United States, Turkey voted “no” to fresh sanctions against Iran, adopted by the UN Security Council in June, arguing that the swap deal should be given a chance.

    The country’s close ties with Iran, coupled by a deep crisis in relations with one-time ally Israel, have sparked concern that Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s government is taking Turkey away from the West. — AFP

  • Turkey’s relationship with west on the line in European missile defence negotiations

    Turkey’s relationship with west on the line in European missile defence negotiations

    Turkey’s government has been told that its relationship with the West could be seriously damaged if it rejects Nato’s request to house part of a £165 million ballistic missile-defence shield that is being built to protect Europe from nuclear attack.

    By Praveen Swami, Diplomatic Editor

    tayyip erdogan

    Recep Erdrogan, Turkey’s Prime Minister, is torn between his Islamist supporters and his country’s western allies Photo: REUTERS

    Hillary Clinton, the US secretary of state and Robert Gates, the US secretary of defence, have held out the warning in behind-the-scenes talks with Turkish officials ahead of a Nato summit to be held in Lisbon on November 19, where a final decision is expected to be made on the missile-defence plan.

    “Essentially we’ve told Turkey that missile-defence is an acid test of its commitment to the collective security arrangements it has with its western allies,” a senior US official told The Daily Telegraph.

    Nato’s missile-defence programme is designed to protect Europe’s population from nuclear-armed missiles the West fears Iran may acquire in coming years. The plans involve radar stations that can detect ballistic missile launches, and advanced interceptor missiles which can shoot them down.

    Turkey is critical to the project, since its geographical location means radar sited on its soil will be able to detect Iranian ballistic missile launches early.

    The November 19 deadline has left Recep Erdrogan, Turkey’s Prime Minister, torn between his Islamist supporters and his country’s western allies. Mr Erdrogan has made improving his country’s relationship with Iran a central foreign policy. Turkey voted against a slew of new sanctions imposed by the United Nations on Iran this summer in an effort to slow down its nuclear programme.

    “Sacrificing the Iranian friendship to Nato would mean an end to the independent foreign policy Turkey has followed in recent years, and the respect that that has earned it in the Islamic world, ” “, Hakan Albayrak, an influential pro-government commentator, said.

    Turkey has long sought EU membership a demanded supported by the UK, but resisted by Germany and France. Islamists in Turkey, angered by the rebuff, have been arguing their country’s interests will be best served through new alliances with its eastern neighbours.

    In this case, though, US diplomats believe western pressure is working. Turkey’s military has already mapped locations for specialised radar which would detect ballistic missile launches in Iran. It is also considering acquiring the US-built Patriot PAC3 interceptor missile.

    Even if Turkey does join the missile-defence shield, though, some experts question if it will actually make Europe safe. Theodore Postel and George Lewis, among the world’s top authorities on missile defence, have warned that apparently-successful tests of interceptor missiles were conducted “in carefully orchestrated scenarios that have been designed to hide fundamental flaws”.

    In September, 2009, Barack Obama, the US President, had authorised a £3.15 billion plan provide missile-defence shields for troops deployed in war-zones. The decision reversed earlier plans to develop larger shields to defend the populations of entire territories. But early this year, an official US review concluded the technology meant to protect deployed troops was good enough to protect territories as well.

    Yousaf Butt, a nuclear expert at the Harvard-Smithsonian Centre for Astrophysics, has said this plan rests on unsound foundations. Dr. Butt argued that if Iran was “irrational and suicidal enough to discount the threat of massive nuclear retaliation then a missile defence system that can theoretically intercept only some of the attacking missiles most certainly isn’t going to be a deterrent”.

    Source: Telegraph

  • Turkey in Dilemma Over NATO Shield

    Turkey in Dilemma Over NATO Shield

    By MARC CHAMPION

    ISTANBUL—Turkey’s top security body is set to discuss Wednesday whether to back a U.S.-led plan to build a missile-defense shield against rogue states—a moment that could force Ankara to choose between its longstanding westward orientation and its recent courtship of Iran.

    The National Security Council, which consists of top military commanders and political leaders, is expected to debate the North Atlantic Treaty Organization’s proposal for a defense shield largely built and funded by the U.S. A senior Turkish diplomat said Ankara will have to decide its position before next month’s summit of the 28-nation alliance in Lisbon, Portugal, where Turkey and other NATO members are due to decide whether to go ahead with the plan.

    Agence France-Presse/Getty Images Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, left, with Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan in May. The U.S.-led plan to build a missile-defense shield is proving a headache for Turkey, forcing it to choose between NATO and Iran.
    Agence France-Presse/Getty Images Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, left, with Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan in May. The U.S.-led plan to build a missile-defense shield is proving a headache for Turkey, forcing it to choose between NATO and Iran.

    Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, left, with Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan in May. The U.S.-led plan to build a missile-defense shield is proving a headache for Turkey, forcing it to choose between NATO and Iran.

    For most NATO members, the shield is an insurance policy against a potential missile threat from Iran. It is also a welcome compromise from the much more ambitious plan of the previous Bush administration. That proposal, which would have installed antiballistic missiles in Poland and a forward radar system in the Czech Republic, triggered a fierce backlash from Moscow.

    For Turkey, however, the Obama administration’s scaled-back plan is proving a major diplomatic headache that risks forcing Ankara to choose between NATO and Iran. It is also triggering a fierce debate inside the country over where Turkey’s core interests lie. In recent days, Turkey’s religious conservative and pro-government media have argued that siding with NATO against Iran would end Turkey’s effort to build an independent foreign policy and damage its credibility in the Middle East.

    Both U.S. and Turkish leaders say no decision has yet been made as to which countries will host the forward radar element of the system. Romania and Poland are expected to host land-based missiles when these are deployed, following the initial sea-launched version of the system. But Turkey, which shares a border with Iran, is the location of choice for the plan’s forward radar, according to military analysts and diplomats.

    Turkish leaders have so far remained noncommittal and have asked Washington for assurances and technical details. According to diplomats familiar with the matter, Turkey is asking that NATO not name any specific country as the source of a missile-attack threat. It also seeks to ensure that all of Turkey’s territory is covered by the system and that Turkey has access to all data and a measure of control over the decision to fire. These people say Ankara also wants guarantees that non-NATO members, specifically Israel, wouldn’t gain access to the data.

    “No decisions have been made yet,” said the senior Turkish diplomat. “We don’t know exactly how this system will be formed, what will be the command and control structure, the threat perception and other issues. So that’s why our talks are continuing.”

    U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates, left, and U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton meet with Turkey Defense Minister Mehmet Vecdi Gsynul, not seen, at NATO headquarters on Oct. 14. Mrs. Clinton and Mr. Gates met in Brussels to show support for NATO’s proposed antimissile system.

    Some of the Turkish requests shouldn’t be problematic, said one non-Turkish diplomat familiar with the matter. Command and control of the system would have to be at an operational, not political, level, due to the short time frame available to shoot a missile down. Turkey would therefore have a say—and a potential veto—in setting the rules of engagement. Similarly, other countries, as well as Turkey, are concerned that data should be available only to NATO members, the diplomat said.

    “If Iran is not mentioned by name and the shield covers Turkey in its entirety then I think [Turkey’s government] will go along with it,” said Soli Ozel, a prominent newspaper columnist on international affairs and professor at Bilgi University in Istanbul. “If those conditions are fulfilled and the government still refuses, then all these discussions about Turkey’s direction will come back with a vengeance.”

    Turkey’s military wants the shield, according to Huseyin Bagci, professor of international relations at the Middle East Technical University in Ankara. “[Iranian] Sahab missiles can reach any part of Turkey,” he said, adding that militaries focus on the capabilities of potential foes, not their intentions.

    Indeed, Turkey has a plan of its own to purchase a missile system to protect its borders.Raytheon Co., maker of the Patriot missile, is one of the bidders and earlier this month announced a deal to subcontract part of the Patriot system’s manufacture to Turkey’s largest arms maker, Aselsan Elektronik Sanayi ve Ticaret AS.

    Yet Turkish diplomats are concerned that positioning a NATO missile system on Iran’s border would infuriate Iran, a country that supplies about a third of Turkey’s energy and which Ankara has worked hard to court, presenting itself as a neutral party in the international dispute over Tehran’s nuclear fuel program. A NATO shield also would also cut across the grain of Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu’s frequent statements that Turkey doesn’t believe it is threatened by any of its neighbors.

    Corrections & Amplifications:

    U.S. officials have said that a location of the forward radar element of missile shield that Washington is proposing for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization has yet to be decided, but that Romania and Poland would host land-based missiles in future phases of the program. An earlier version of this article incorrectly said a location for the system as a whole had yet to be decided.

    Write to Marc Champion at [email protected]