Tag: Nagorno-Karabakh

  • Turkey to lodge lawsuit against states, recognizing Armenian genocide

    Turkey to lodge lawsuit against states, recognizing Armenian genocide

    03/22/2010

    Turkish oppositional parties’ MPs from National Unity and Republican People’s Party intend to come up with a lawsuit against the states, that recognized Armenian Genocide of 1915 in Ottoman Empire, Turkish Hurriyet reads.

    The final decision on the matter should be made by Turkish government, that is yet silent.

    According to the Republican MP Sukru Elekdag, international court should give a precise response to Turkey about its fault. He reckons that both countries’ parliaments break assumption of innocence, accusing Turkey of the genocide: “I suppose that if we achieve the international out-of-court settlement, extensive work should be done to establish our case.”

    He deems the states, that already recognized the fact of genocide should realize the meaning of the word and determine whether one state can accuse the other of such a crime.

    S.T.

    News from Armenia – NEWS.am

  • Uncomfortable Truth ; Mr Erdogan’s unfortunate threats

    Uncomfortable Truth ; Mr Erdogan’s unfortunate threats

    Re: Uncomfotable Truth – 18/03/2010 as below.
    Dear Editor,
    Mr Erdogan’s unfortunate threats are truly regrettable especially as he does not represent the views of most Turkish People. His threats were quickly denied by his own Foreign Secretary Mr Davutoglu, indicating that this is not part of an Turkish Foreign Policy agenda. You are right in finding his intervention as demagogic and disreputable but he is still the same Prime Minister whose reputation and achievements have been held up as an example of a leader of a moderate Islamic government by most commentators in EU and US until very recently!
    Regarding the Armenian genocide claims, this is far from being an accepted fact and an ‘uncomfortable truth’ for Turkey. The claims have been strongly disputed by hundreds of archives (English, French and Russian) and many non Turkish and Turkish scholars. By the way the Armenian Government refuses to open its own archives. The real truth is that there were awful killings and deaths on both sides due to war, starvation and extreme cold and that in fact more Turks than Armenians had died tragically during this period. Unfortunately the powerful Armenian Diaspora continues to distort history and many people are blind to the obvious facts. Only last year Lord Avebury, along with Armenian activists were trying to lobby the Turkish Parliament by impressing on them the notorious and discredited ‘Blue Book’ and had to be stopped ( details are available).
    We hope that we are all interested in the real truth and that it must prevail.
    Yours faithfully,

    Betula Nelson
    Media Relations
    The Ataturk Society of the UK

    From The Times
    March 18, 2010

    Uncomfortable Truth

    Turkish threats to expel Armenian migrants to make a political point are shameful

    • 9 Comments
    Recommend? (16)

    Deportations have powerful symbolism in modern European history. The notion that the government of a would-be member state of the EU might propose the forced collective expulsion from its territory of a specified nationality ought to be unthinkable. Yet that course was casually threatened yesterday by Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the Turkish Prime Minister, against 100,000 Armenian migrants.

    Its purported justification was the recent passage of non-binding resolutions in the US Congress and the Swedish parliament. These motions describe as genocide the mass killings of Armenians in the Ottoman Empire during and after the First World War. Turkey takes strong issue with the claim of genocide. The history and politics of TurkishArmenian relations are convoluted, but the ethics of Mr Erdogan’s remarks are not. His intervention is demagogic and disreputable.

    The US and Swedish votes were carried by narrow margins and were opposed by their respective governments. The historical events that they recall began with the massacres of Armenians in the Ottoman Empire in 1915. The very word “genocide” is a post-1945 coinage, intended to define the peculiar barbarity of Nazism. Only gradually did the Armenian massacres come to be recognised as the first authentic case of genocide in the 20th century. But so they were. On conservative historical estimates, around a million Armenians were killed in a xenophobic purge that continued till 1923. It was a crime without precedent in modern history.

    Historical truth matters. It is extraordinary that the Government of modern Turkey should resist it. No one alive today was responsible for these barbarities. They were committed by an imperial power that has long since passed into history along with Wilhelmine Germany, to which it was allied in the First World War. While running for the presidency, Barack Obama declared his intention of being a leader who would speak the truth about the Armenian genocide. In practice, while his views are a matter of record, Mr Obama has been conciliatory in relations with Turkey.

    Mr Erdogan has little cause for complaint about the symbolic diplomacy of resolutions on historical events. He has no justification whatever for threats against Armenian migrants. Turkey is home to thousands of illegal immigrants from Armenia. Few would dispute that sovereign nations have the right to determine barriers to entry on the part of non-citizens, but these are migrants who have sought refuge from disaster. Forming an impoverished population that does necessary but low-wage work, they include many whose homes and livelihoods were destroyed in the Armenian earthquake of 1988. Mr Erdogan estimated yesterday that of 170,000 Armenians in Turkey, only 70,000 held Turkish citizenship. He threatened directly to tell the rest to leave.

    Turkey is a member state of Nato and a strategically important power within the Western alliance. It borders Iraq, in whose stability the Western democracies have an intense interest. But the Government in Ankara cannot exploit that status in order to advance its own diplomatic goals at the expense of liberal values. To object to a proper historical accounting of awesome crimes is a demeaning and destructive stance. But then to retaliate against the most vulnerable people within Turkey’s borders is unconscionable.

  • Advice to Prime Minister Erdogan:

    Advice to Prime Minister Erdogan:

    Continue Denying the Armenian Genocide

    Mr. Erdogan, please keep up the good work. Armenians need your kind assistance to pursue their cause until justice is done.

    By Harut Sassounian

    Publisher, The California Courier

    sassounian32

    It is a well-known fact that Turkish leaders are exceptional diplomats. However, as soon as they hear the words Armenian Genocide, Greece, Cyprus or Kurdistan, these diplomats lose their “cool” and resort to emotional outbursts and undiplomatic actions that harm their own interests.

    Realizing that this is the 95th anniversary of the Armenian Genocide, Turkish officials have been nervously preparing themselves for the upcoming tsunami of commemorations that would remind the international community of the crimes against humanity committed by Ottoman Turks.

    The first unexpected shot was fired on February 26 by the Parliament of the Autonomous Government of Catalonia, Spain, when it unanimously recognized the Armenian Genocide. Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu immediately contacted his Spanish counterpart and Catalonian officials venting his anger and demanding an apology!

    Two days later, an expose of the Armenian Genocide was aired by CBS’s 60 Minutes, showing bones of Armenian victims still protruding from Syrian desert sands, almost a century later! The Turks were livid, accusing Armenians of unduly influencing the CBS network and questioning, as usual, the authenticity of the bones and the sand!

    Four days later, the U.S. House Foreign Affairs Committee adopted a resolution acknowledging the Armenian Genocide. Turkey lost despite:

    n      Pressuring the Obama administration to oppose the resolution;

    n      Hiring multi-million dollar lobbying firms;

    n      Sending teams of Turkish parliamentarians to Washington;

    n      E-mail campaigns by Turkish and Azeri Americans; and

    n      Threatening to boycott U.S. defense contractors if they did not oppose the resolution.

    Immediately after losing that vote, Turkey recalled its Ambassador from Washington, indicating that he may be kept in Ankara until after April 24. State Minister Zafer Caglayan postponed his U.S. visit, intended to develop economic ties, “until the United States corrects its mistake.” A scheduled trip by the executive board of the Turkish Industrialists’ & Businessmen’s Association to Washington on March 16 and 17 was also canceled, and anti-American protests were held in Turkish cities. More importantly, Prime Minister Erdogan indicated that he might cancel his planned participation in the global summit on nuclear security to be held in Washington next month.

    Before Turkish passions had cooled down, Sweden’s Parliament dealt a second devastating blow to Ankara on March 11, by reaffirming the genocide of Armenians, Assyrians, and Greeks, by a vote of 131-130. Once again, Turkey recalled its Ambassador, and Prime Minister Erdogan canceled his upcoming trip to Stockholm which was to be accompanied by a large trade delegation. And, anti-Swedish demonstrations were held in several Turkish cities.

    These overly dramatic reactions prompted Turkish and foreign commentators to have a field day, speculating that if more countries recognize the Armenian Genocide, Turkey won’t have ambassadors left anywhere in the world, and Turkish officials won’t be visiting other countries, having to cancel their overseas trips. Furthermore, Turkey would be left without any imported goods and a weakened military, having canceled all purchases from the outside world. Turkey’s isolation is a just retribution for its denialist policy. By trying to punish others, Turkey is simply punishing itself.

    Vahe Magarian of Cincinnati, Ohio, sent a pointed letter to the New York Times last week, suggesting that Turkey’s recalled Ambassadors, “rather than flying home, should be made to march home on foot. Forced marches were the preferred means of travel during the dying days of the Ottoman Empire.”

    Prominent Turkish commentator Can Dundar wrote in Haber1 an article titled: “Are we going to recall all our Ambassadors?” He stated that, at this rate, by the time the 100th anniversary of the Armenian Genocide rolls around in 2015, there won’t be a single country left not accusing Turkey of genocide. Isn’t it about time that we search out what dirty work our fathers did 95 years ago? Shouldn’t we ask what did we do wrong, Dundar implored.

    The main reason why Turkish officials panic every time the Armenian Genocide is acknowledged by yet another country is their fear of being asked to pay compensation for Armenian losses and return the occupied lands. Prime Minister Erdogan and his colleagues don’t seem to understand that Genocide recognition by itself does not lead to legal claims. How many inches of land have Armenians managed to liberate from Turkey as a result of such recognition by more than 20 countries? If Turkish leaders would only understand that parliamentary resolutions have no legal effect, maybe they would not get so excited over them!

    Nevertheless, there should be no doubt that Armenians still demand the return of their ancestral lands located in Eastern Turkey. Such claims have to be pursued in various courts, unless an unexpected cataclysmic event occurs first, causing the collapse or dismemberment of the Turkish State.

    In the meantime, we advise Mr. Erdogan to continue denying the Genocide at every opportunity, in order to encourage Armenians to persist in their efforts to expose Ankara’s lies. Were it not for Turkish officials’ vehement denials, there would not have been a worldwide outcry to reaffirm the facts of the Armenian Genocide by airing TV documentaries and adopting genocide resolutions.

    Mr. Erdogan, please keep up the good work. Armenians need your kind assistance to pursue their cause until justice is done.

  • Gul Named Chatham House Prize Winner Because Of His Leader Qualities, Says Chairman

    Gul Named Chatham House Prize Winner Because Of His Leader Qualities, Says Chairman

    gul ve karisi

    LONDON (A.A) – 19.03.2010 – Turkish President Abdullah Gul has been voted the winner of this year’s Chatham House Prize because of his qualities as a national, regional and international leader, Chairman of Chatham House said on Friday.

    “I warmly congratulate the President on this award which recognizes his accomplishments and acknowledges the growing influence he has achieved for Turkey,” DeAnne Julius said in a statement.

    Gul will be invited to collect the award and a scroll signed by Queen Elizabeth II at a ceremony in London later this year. The other nominees for this year’s prize were French Finance Minister Christine Lagarde and Croatian President Stjepan Mesic.

    Robin Niblett, Director of Chatham House, said “Chatham House members have a deep interest in international affairs and have voted for President Gul to acknowledge his efforts within Turkey as well as on the international stage. Our members represent a cross-section of the most influential globally orientated individuals in business, academia and public life.”

    Suzan Sabancı Dincer, a member of Chatham House Panel of Senior Advisers, and Chairman and Executive Board Member of Akbank, said that she was proud and delighted that President Gul is to receive this prestigious award.

    “His efforts to bring stability and prosperity to Turkey’s region and his encouragement of Turkey’s rapid progress towards reform and full European integration have been acknowledged by Chatham House members,” she said.

    The Chatham House Prize is an annual award presented to the statesperson deemed by members of the Royal Institute of International Affairs at Chatham House to have made the most significant contribution to the improvement of international relations in the previous year. (TÇ-CE)

    =========================================================

    President      Abdullah Gül Voted Winner of the Chatham House Prize 2010

    FOR IMMEDIATE      RELEASE 13.30 HRS FRIDAY 19 MARCH

    Abdullah Gül, President of Turkey, has been voted the winner of
    the Chatham House      Prize 2010. This annual award is presented to
    the statesperson deemed      by members of the Royal Institute of
    International Affairs at Chatham      House to have made the most
    significant contribution to the improvement      of international
    relations in the previous year.

    President Gül is recognized for being a significant figure for
    reconciliation and moderation within Turkey      and internationally,
    and a driving force behind many of the positive      steps that Turkey
    has taken in recent years.

    Mr Gül has worked to deepen Turkey’s      traditional ties with
    the Middle East, mediate between the fractious      groups in Iraq
    and bring together the Afghan and Pakistani leaderships to try to
    resolve      disputes during 2009. He has also made significant efforts
    to reunify the      divided island of Cyprus and has played a leading
    role, along      with his Armenian counterpart, in initiating a process
    of reconciliation      between Turkey and Armenia.

    President Gül is also recognized for being an unwavering
    proponent of      anchoring Turkey      in the European Union. Under
    his leadership, Turkey is consolidating      civilian democratic rule
    and undergoing extensive political and legal      reforms to bring the
    country closer to European standards of democracy      and human rights.

    President Gül will be invited to collect the award and a scroll
    signed by      our Patron, Her Majesty The Queen, at a ceremony in
    London later this year.

    Dr DeAnne      Julius, Chairman of Chatham House, said:
    ‘President Gül has been      voted the winner of this year’s Chatham
    House Prize because of his      qualities as a national, regional and
    international leader. I warmly      congratulate the President on this
    award which recognizes his      accomplishments and acknowledges the
    growing influence he has achieved      for Turkey.’

    Dr Robin      Niblett, Director of Chatham House, said: ‘Chatham
    House members have      a deep interest in international affairs and
    have voted for President Gül      to acknowledge his efforts within
    Turkey as well as on the      international stage. Our members
    represent a cross-section of globally      orientated individuals in
    business, academia and public life.’

    Suzan Sabanci Dinçer, Panel of Senior Advisers, Chatham House,
    and      Chairman and Executive Board Member, Akbank, said: ‘As a
    Chatham House      Senior Adviser and a Turkish citizen I am proud and
    delighted that      President Gül is to receive this prestigious award.
    His efforts to bring      stability and prosperity to Turkey’s region
    and his encouragement of      Turkey’s rapid progress towards reform
    and full European integration have      been acknowledged by Chatham
    House members.’

    About      the Chatham House Prize
    The process to select the nominees of the Prize draws      on the
    recommendations of our research teams and the advice of our three
    Presidents. Chatham House members then vote for the winner in a ballot.
    The winner is presented with a crystal award and a scroll signed
    by our      Patron, Her Majesty The Queen. The other nominees for the
    2010 Prize were      Christine Lagarde, Finance Minister, France and
    Stjepan Mesic, President      of Croatia (2000-10).

    Previous      Winners of the Chatham House Prize
    President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva of Brazil won the Prize in
    2009;      President John Kufuor of Ghana was the 2008 winner; HH
    Sheikha Mozah,      Chairperson of the Qatar Foundation for Education,
    Science and Community      Development, was the 2007 winner; Joaquim
    Chissano, President of      Mozambique (1986-2005), was the 2006
    winner; and President Victor      Yushchenko of Ukraine was awarded the
    inaugural Prize in 2005.

    About      the Royal Institute of International Affairs (Chatham
    House)
    Chatham House is both the name of the building in London in which
    the institute is based      and the name by which the Royal Institute
    of International Affairs is      widely known. Our mission is to be a
    world-leading source of independent      analysis, informed debate and
    influential ideas on how to build a      prosperous and secure world
    for all.

    Chatham      House Presidents
    Chatham House is politically independent and has Presidents
    and Council Members from each of the three major UK      political
    parties. Our Presidents are: Lord Ashdown,      (High Representative of
    the International Community and EU Special      Representative in
    Bosnia        and Herzegovina between 2002-06); Sir John Major, (UK
    Prime Minister 1990-97); and Lord Robertson (Secretary      General,
    NATO, 1999-2003).

    Contacts

    Dates for the award ceremony will be released in a separate
    press announcement when the details are confirmed. The award ceremony
    will take place in London      and will be open to the media.

    Nicola Norton, Media Relations      Manager
    Direct: +44 (0)20 7957 5739
    Mobile: +44      (0)7917 757 528
    nnorton@chathamhouse.org.uk

    Sara Karnas, Communications Administrator
    Direct: +44 (0)20 7314 2787
    Mobile: +44      (0)7958 669 785
    skarnas@chathamhouse.org.uk

    Keith Burnet, Communications      Director
    Direct: +44 (0)20 7314 2798
    Mobile: +44      (0)7714 200 920
    kburnet@chathamhouse.org.uk

    ENDS

  • Ankara Seeks Influence Through Turks Living Abroad

    Ankara Seeks Influence Through Turks Living Abroad

    Leaders of Turkish descent across Europe recently received an invitation to a fancy event in Istanbul, all expenses paid. But what sounded innocent enough appears to have been an attempt by Ankara to get members of the Turkish diaspora to represent Turkish interests abroad. Turkish-German politicians have reacted angrily to the brazen lobbying.

    NOTE:

    WHAT WAS NOT MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLE IS THE INVITED PEOPLE WERE THE ONES CLOSER TO FETULLAH GULEN’S ORGANIZATION.. OR THE ONES THEY NEED TO DRAFT TO GULENIST MOVEMENT …AKP IS CONSIDERING THE GULENISTS ARE THE LIEDERS OF TURKISH DIASPORA

    SECULAR TURKISH ORGANIZATIONS AND TURKS REFUSED TO ATTEND.

    AMERIKADAN NEWYORK MERKEZLI BIR UST KURULUS BU TOPLANTIYA KATILMIS VE SUNUM YAPMISDIR.. AZERI WEB SITELERINDE CIKAN BU HABERI IKI HAFTA ONCE ILETTIK

    FETULLAHIN GÖLGESİNDE YAPILAŞAN*DIŞ TÜRKLER* 27 ŞUBAT TOPLANTISI

    DR. ERDAL SENER (TURKISH FORUM)

    The invitation that numerous Turkish-German politicians received in February sounded enticing: Lunch in a five-star hotel in Istanbul, travel expenses included. The session was titled: “Wherever One of Our Compatriots Is, We Are There Too.”

    Around 1,500 people of Turkish descent from several European countries accepted the tempting offer. Among the speakers at the event, which took place at the end of February, were businesspeople, NGO representatives and a member of the Belgian parliament of Turkish descent. But the meeting, which has sparked outrage among Turkish-German politicians, was more than a harmless gathering of the Turkish diaspora.

    The event was organized by the Turkish government, which is led by the conservative-religious Justice and Development (AKP) party, in an attempt to send a clear message to the participants that they should represent Turkey in other countries. Turks living abroad should take the citizenship of their new home country — not, however, with the intention of becoming an integrated part of that society, but so they can become politically active, said Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, who spoke at the event. Erdogan also compared Islamophobia with anti-Semitism in his speech and said that countries which oppose dual citizenship are violating people’s fundamental rights. (Germany, for example, generally does not allow its citizens to hold dual nationality.)

    ‘Crime Against Humanity’

    Participants in the session told SPIEGEL ONLINE that the Turkish prime minister then repeated a sentence which had already sparked fierce criticism when he said it during a 2008 speech in Cologne: “Assimilation is a crime against humanity.” And even stronger language was apparently used by one representative of the Turkish government. According to Ali Ertan Toprak, the vice chairman of the Alevi community in Germany, who was present at the lunch, one speaker went so far as to say: “We need to inoculate European culture with Turkish culture.”

    The language in the invitiations already suggested the attitude of the Turkish government toward Turkish-German politicians. Ankara perceives them as being its own. Invitations sent in the name of Turkish Labor Minister Faruk Celik to German Bundestag members were addressed as “my esteemed members of parliament” and Erdogan was referred to as “our prime minister.”

    Turkish-German politicians and religious representatives in Germany are now voicing sharp criticism of Ankara. “It was very clearly a lobbying event on the part of the Turkish government,” said Toprak. He said that he himself was shocked about how openly the Turkish government had expressed its view that Germans of Turkish descent should represent Turkey’s interests. “If members of the (conservative) Christian Democratic Union who oppose EU membership for Turkey had been there, they would have got a lot of material for their arguments,” Toprak says.

    Highly Problematic

    Canan Bayram, a member of the Berlin state parliament, said she only attended the meeting because, as an integration spokeswoman for the Green Party in the city, she felt she needed to see what an event like this was like. Of course she covered her own travel and accommodation expenses, she said. “It was important to me that I make it clear that, as a member of a German state parliament, I do not allow the Turkish government to pay my expenses.” Sirvan Cakici, a member of the Bremen state parliament for the Left Party who attended the Istanbul meeting, also emphasized that she paid for her expenses herself.

    “The Turkish government should pay more attention to the interests of Turks in Turkey, rather than trying to exploit Turkish-Germans as their ambassadors,” said Vural Öger, a former member of the European Parliament who was also at the lunch.

    Other Turkish-German politicians turned down the invitation because they saw it as highly problematic right from the beginning. “It was clear that this was purely a lobbying event on the part of the Turkish government. As a German politician, I did not belong there,” says Özcan Mutlu, a member of the Berlin state parliament for the Greens. “We are not an extended arm of the Turkish government.” Memet Kilic, a member of the federal parliament with the Green Party, also declined to take part for similar reasons.

    ‘Unacceptable’

    It is not, in fact, the first time that the Turkish government has sought contact to Turkish-German politicians. After the 2009 parliamentary elections, Turkish-German Bundestag members received congratulatory calls from the AKP government. And in October 2009, the Turkish government invited German parliamentarians to an AKP party congress in Ankara.

    Ekin Deligöz, a member of the Bundestag for the Greens, says she has in the past received numerous invitations from the Turkish government, which she has turned down out of principle. “I refuse to represent the interests of the Turkish government simply because I was born in Turkey.”

    Turkish-German politicians feel that, in principle, it is acceptable if the Turkish government tries to seek contact with Bundestag members of Turkish descent. “After all, we act as a kind of bridge,” says Kilic. “It’s the most normal thing in the world.” He adds that it is “unacceptable,” however, if Ankara openly says that politicians of Turkish descent should act as a mouthpiece for Turkish interests.

    Sevim Dagdelen, a Bundestag member for the Left Party who turned down the invitation to attend the February event, talks of a “parallel foreign policy” on the part of the Turkish government. “I don’t want to be part of it,” she says. “I find it regrettable and cause for concern that other German politicians are apparently taking part.

  • Armenian Nazi Battalion during World War II

    Armenian Nazi Battalion during World War II

    “Armenian Nazi General Dro commanded the 20,000
    strong Armenian-Nazi 812th Battalion during World War II”

    ERMENI nazi legionTURKISHFORUM DANISMA KURULU UYESI VE YAZARI MERHUM SAMUEL WEEMS’IN KITABINDAN BIR ALINTI

    Samuel A. Weems – There was a funeral a few weeks ago in Vienna, Austria. Two small black urns were buried containing the brains and a few remains of 4-year old Annemarie Danner and 18-month old Gerhard Zeketner. During World War II these were two of the more than 600 children the Nazis proclaimed “worthless lives.” These children were taken to Vienna’s Am Stein Hospital to be murdered and their bodies used for medical research.

    Between 1935 and 1945, in the name of medical science and research, the Nazis murdered more than 75,000 individuals, including 5,000 children across Europe, in their quest to create a racial/ethnic pure state. These acts of terror and cruelty were in addition to what the Nazis did at their many death camps were Jews were exterminated.

    The term “genocide” was invented and created in 1944 to describe all the many different acts of murder the Nazis used in their attempt to exterminate the entire Jewish race. Annemarie Danner and Gerhard Zeketner are but two of the individual lives the Nazis stamped out.

    Armenians today are attempting to “steal” the term genocide by making the fake claim that the Turks massacred 1.5 million of their people in 1915. The undisputed hard evidence is that this tall tale was nothing more than the figment of the imagination of a high priest of the one and only state Armenian church. The priest’s motive for making up and telling this horrible lie was his attempt to get a foreign government to come and help the Armenians obtain someone else’s homes and land for free. This great lie is the foundation upon which the Armenian government has established its multi billion dollar fake “genocide industry.” The Armenians have been operating on this great lie since 1918. Armenia operates their “genocide industry” with great success in today’s world even if they do operate on fraud and deceit.

    The truth is the Ottoman Turks did only one thing which had good cause for doing so, but gave the Armenians a chance to claim that there was a massacre going on. That single act was to ask the Armenian Church to help them stop their congregations’ nightly terrorist acts against the Ottoman military supply lines. The Russians had invaded the Ottoman Empire and the Armenians in the eastern part of the country had joined the Russians. The Armenian Church refused to help the Ottoman government and state officials responded by saying they would themselves have to remove all Armenians from behind their army lines.

    Thereafter, the Ottoman government did remove all the Armenians who were doing such harm to their military forces. The United States of America has done exactly

    the same thing during World War II. Several Americans are known to have seen Armenians being alive and leaving the combat zone even though the Armenian church claims they were all murdered.

    At no time did the Ottoman Turks exterminate children for medical research as the Nazis did between 1935–1945. What makes such acts of Nazi terrorism worse is the fact they did not act alone in their attempts to create an ethnic/racial pure state. Consider the fact that more than 100,000 Armenians volunteered for Nazi military service and took an active part in the Nazi ethnic/racial cleansing campaigns. For ten long years Armenians took part in exterminating not only Jews but also children such as Annemarie Danner and Gerhard Zeketner.

    During World War II Armenians learned well the art of racial/ethnic cleansing from their Nazi partners in crime. Today. Armenia has ethnically/racially cleansed their tiny state so successfully that 94.8% of their population is now ethnically pure Armenian. The Armenians have ethnically/racially cleansed their tiny state of what they consider their “undesirables” much like they helped the Nazis do between 1935/1945. Jews, Muslims, and Christians of other faiths other than the state owned and approved church have either been murdered or forced out of Armenia.

    Consider the fact of how Armenia today continues to honor the Nazis. The Armenian Nazi General Dro commanded the 20,000 strong Armenian-Nazi 812th Battalion during World War II. After the war, even though serving the Nazis, Armenian Dro talked his way into the United States of America where he remained until his death. Just last year Armenians dug him up and took his body back to Armenia where he was reburied with full military and state honors. The Armenian American colony raised several hundred thousand dollars to help fund a youth leadership institute to honor this Armenian Nazi general. Just what specific leadership is Armenian children being taught today in the General Dro leadership institute–hate, ethnic purity of the Armenian race, racial superiority?

    And to think the Armenians, still running their “genocide industry” scam are building their very own genocide memorial two blocks from the American White House. There are less than one million Armenians even in the United States. Why should they spend $75 million dollars on a false claim to something that is disputed that happened 6000 miles away more than 85 years ago. The answer is simple. The Armenian American colony will use this self-invented, fake memorial to deceive and fleece even more American taxpayer dollars for their less than 200 year old homeland the Russians gave them after taking these lands from the Muslim owners. This Armenian genocide memorial will become one of the greatest and largest frauds ever attempted in the history of the entire world. Can anyone believe that Armenians, who took a very active role in the Jewish genocide of World War II, can build such a fake memorial to themselves today for the sole purpose of deceiving and fleecing American Christian taxpayers out of more and more foreign aid money that over the past ten years alone amounts to almost $1.5 billion dollars!

    It is fair to ask since the Armenians were ten year partners in crime with the Nazis during the World War II years–will they have a memorial to Annemarie and Gerhard and all the other poor souls the Armenians helped the Nazis murder and exterminate?

    Samuel A. Weems is a retired U.S. judge from Arkansas and is the author of ARMENIA: Secrets of A ‘Christian’ Terrorist State, The Armenian Great Deception Series – Volume 1, St. John Press. […]

    BU KITAP TURKISH FORUMDAN TEMIN EDILEBILIR