Tag: Nagorno-Karabakh

  • Iran Opposes Any U.S. Peacekeeping Role For Karabakh

    Iran Opposes Any U.S. Peacekeeping Role For Karabakh

    A HALO Trust road sign in an area in Nagorno-Karabakh that was cleared of land mines.A HALO Trust road sign in an area in Nagorno-Karabakh that was cleared of land mines.

    June 24, 2010
    YEREVAN — An Iranian diplomat says Tehran is strongly opposed to U.S. involvement in a multinational peacekeeping force that would be deployed around the disputed territory of Nagorno-Karabakh in the event of an Armenian-Azerbaijani peace accord, RFE/RL’s Armenian Service reports.

    Iranian Ambassador to Armenia Seyed Ali Saghaeyan issued the warning at a news conference in Yerevan on June 23.

    Such a peacekeeping operation is an important element of the current and previous peace proposals made by the United States, Russian, and French mediators spearheading international efforts to settle the dispute over the breakaway Azerbaijani region.

    Analysts have long speculated about the possible composition of foreign troops that would enforce a future peace deal.

    According to Saghaeyan, the United States is keen to have troops in Azerbaijan’s Fizuli district, which borders Iran and was mostly occupied by Karabakh Armenian forces in 1993. He claimed such a move would pose a serious threat to Iran given its tense relations with Washington.

    “Iran is the only country adjacent to the conflicting parties, and in terms if ensuring its own security, it will not allow the deployment of American forces,” Saghayean said.

    Meanwhile, Armenian President Serzh Sarkisian on June 22 urged Western powers to respect Iran’s geopolitical interests in the South Caucasus and held up Armenia’s economic projects with the Islamic republic as a model for regional cooperation.

    Ending an official visit to Germany, Sarkisian also asserted that the Western-backed energy projects involving Azerbaijan and excluding Armenia have only complicated a peaceful resolution of the Karabakh conflict.

    In a speech at the Konrad Adenauer Foundation in Berlin, he said: “I do realize that in the light of the sanctions imposed on Iran some people will treat my approach with skepticism, but I am convinced that it is wrong and not possible to ignore Iran in regional solutions.”

    Sarkisian did not specify what concrete role Iran should play in regional security. Nor was it clear whether he thinks Tehran should have a major say in the Karabakh peace process.

    https://www.rferl.org/a/Iran_Against_Any_US_Peacekeeping_Role_For_Karabakh/2081078.html
  • Fetullahs Businessman  flex their newfound political power

    Fetullahs Businessman flex their newfound political power

    Wednesday, June 23, 2010
    Rep. Bill Pascrell, center, and Levant Koc, right, of the Interfaith Dialog Center, with Mehmet Sahin of the Turkish Parliament.
    BY HERB JACKSON
    The Record
    WASHINGTON CORRESPONDENT

    Turkic businessmen and community leaders packed a posh Washington hotel to announce their new national group, and invited members of Congress to learn about their growing population and economic power.

    “I want to see all the Jersey guys,” says Rep. Bill Pascrell Jr., D-Paterson, who is quickly surrounded in the Willard Hotel ballroom. “Are these the guys that own all the restaurants?”

    Census data show Pascrell’s district is home to the biggest concentration of Turks in New Jersey, and as he works the room, he waves to members of the band he recognizes from events in Passaic County. He also meets Mehmet Sahin, a member of the Turkish Parliament who, among other things, is seeking contacts for an associate who wants to open a hotel in New Jersey.

    Near the buffet table, Rep. Scott Garrett, R-Wantage, takes a break from his tabbouleh to debate with a Westfield businessman about whether Governor Christie really will cut property taxes.

    Congressmen wooing new business to their districts or debating local politics is hardly new terrain, and in that sense, the opening gala of the Assembly of Turkic American Federations (A fetullah Gulen Organization)last month is like thousands of other receptions every year in Washington.

    But the formation of the ATAF, which highlights an Islamic identity that makes some secular Turks uneasy, comes as Turks are playing catch-up in the Washington influence game.

    They especially want to counter the influence of Armenian-Americans, whose No. 1 issue in Washington for decades has been a United States declaration that the deaths of 1.5 million Armenians in Turkey from 1915 to 1923 were genocide.

    Turkey denies the charge, and disputes what Rutgers University genocide expert Alex Hinton says is a consensus of historians.

    When the latest genocide affirmation resolution passed the House Foreign Affairs Committee by a razor-thin 23-22 margin in March, Turkey briefly recalled its ambassador, and congressional opponents warned that full passage in Congress would damage relations with an important ally.

    Co-sponsors of the measure — including the entire New Jersey delegation except Pascrell — do not share that fear.

    “It should not injure a relationship built on many other things,” said Sen. Frank Lautenberg, D-N.J., who added that his attendance at the ATAF gala was not a sign he was changing his support for the genocide resolution.

    Until recently, Turkey argued its case in Washington primarily through influential former members of Congress who registered with the Justice Department as foreign agents of its government.

    Over the past decade, a few hundred congressional staffers and a handful of members of Congress also took trips funded by Turkish-American groups to Ankara, Istanbul and other cities.

    Starting in 2007, however, the first of two federal political action committees registered, and the principal leader for one of the PACs also registered as a federal lobbyist in 2008.

    By contrast, Armenian groups had spent $2.6 million from 1999 through 2007 on lobbying, and made $569,000 in contributions through federal PACs.

    “We’re historically disorganized,” said Levent Koc, chief executive of the Interfaith Dialog Center founded in Carlstadt and now based in Newark, who invited many of the New Jersey officials to the reception. “We decided to come together for better coordination and communication.”

    The ATAF is an umbrella for 150 separate local organizations around the country, including Koc’s center, the Turkish Cultural Center in Ridgefield and the Pioneer Academy of Science in Clifton.

    All are affiliated with Turkish Muslim scholar Fethullah Gulen, Koc said. Gulen, who now lives in Pennsylvania, advocates a conservative brand of Islam that condemns terrorism and advocates more interfaith cooperation and science education. He was acquitted in absentia of what supporters called politically motivated charges in Turkey of advocating an Islamic state.

    Koc said the new group’s primary goal is to foster better understanding of Turkic people — a term that includes not only those from Turkey but also those from such countries as Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan — and cooperation between Muslims and other faiths.

    It’s not connected to the Turkish government or Turkish politics, he said.

    But one person attending the reception, South Hackensack chemical importer Tarik Ok, said one reason the ATAF was forming now was, “The government suggested we all go under one roof.”

    The new group has the leader of a much older group with a similar name uneasy.

    Gunay Evinch, president of the 30-year-old Assembly of Turkish American Associations, said he has asked the newly formed Assembly of Turkic American Federations to change its name and make its ties to the Gulen movement clear.

    “I told them it’s unnecessarily confusing, and it would be better to define yourselves as who you are, a sect movement within Islam,” said Evinch, who has already received mail at his Washington headquarters intended for the other group.

    Evinch said his group and the Turkish Coalition of America, which created a PAC in 2007 and registered to lobby in 2008, have worked hard to increase Turkish influence in Washington by getting American Turks to overcome a reluctance to make campaign contributions.

    “Turks did not [traditionally] reach into their pockets to give to campaigns, they thought it was corrupt,” he said. “The PAC educated people to understand that in the U.S. you can give to campaigns.”

    Evinch said a key difference between his ATAA and the new ATAF is that his group advocates only on issues important to Turks and Turkey, including the Armenian resolution and questions surrounding Cyprus.

    “We don’t advance the cause of Islam or a sect of Islam, and we don’t do interfaith dialogue based on Islam or any religion,” he said. “We also don’t import Turkish politics into our community.”

    Koc said that while it supports better understanding of Islam, his group is not limited to Muslims.

    “I cannot say we’re faith-based. Some scholars say this is a religiously motivated social movement. That doesn’t mean we are serving only Muslims or Turks. We serve all,” Koc said.

    He also disputed any religious motivation in seeking a change in Turkey’s government.

    “There’s a new generation in Turkey, and it’s more open. People opposed to this change are blaming religious people, but there are change supporters who are left wing and right wing, some of them are old socialists,” Koc said.

    “When they try to change the status quo, people who want the status quo blame Muslims. I don’t know why.”

    E-mail: jackson@northjersey.com

  • Turkey opposition gains ground amid eastward drift

    Turkey opposition gains ground amid eastward drift

    By SUZAN FRASER (AP) – 23 hours ago

    ANKARA, Turkey — Turkey rallied behind Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan in his blistering condemnation of Israel after its commando raid on an aid ship to Gaza.

    But as dust settles from the May 31 attack, Turkey’s resurgent opposition seems to be gaining traction by articulating fears that Erdogan is steering NATO’s only Muslim member away from the West, jeopardizing EU membership efforts, and even undermining a long-running battle against separatist Kurds.

    The views of the Republican People’s Party — which considers itself a guarantor of secular values and enjoys a power base among Western-leaning urban elites — are increasingly important.

    The movement has a popular new leader following the resignation of its chairman over a sex scandal and many have high hopes that he can rejuvenate the party, presenting a viable alternative to Erdogan and anchoring Turkey firmly back in its Western orientation.

    Kemal Kilicdaroglu made a name for himself by exposing corruption within Erdogan party’s that led to two senior officials stepping down.

    While condemning the Israeli assault that killed eight Turks and a Turkish-American and calling on Jerusalem to end its Gaza blockade, Kilicdaroglu’s party has also criticized Erdogan’s confrontational style against Israel and accused the prime minister of trying to use outrage to win elections due next year.

    “We are witnessing a serious crisis of confidence between (Erdogan’s party) and the West … This crisis must end immediately,” Kilicdaroglu said in a speech.

    A recent opinion poll shows that the Republican People’s Party has made gains since Kilicdaroglu took the party reins, although Erdogan’s Justice and Democracy Party remains more popular.

    The survey, conducted by the Konsensus research company for Haberturk newspaper and published Saturday, shows 38.8 percent backing Erdogan’s party against 31.3 percent for Kilicdaroglu’s Republicans — up from the 25 percent support for the party under the previous leadership. No margin of error was given.

    “The belief that there is no alternative to (Erdogan’s party) has ended with Kilicdaroglu becoming chairman,” Konsensus general manager Murat Sari was quoted as saying.

    The survey, however, showed that Kilicdaroglu gained support from a nationalist party, not from Erdogan’s ruling party, suggesting that skepticism about the opposition remains widespread.

    The Republican Party has long projected a strict — and some say intolerant — form of secularism that has opposed among other things, young women wearing Islamic-style headscarves at universities.

    It claims to be the heir to the legacy of Turkey’s modernizing founding father, Mustafa Kemal Ataturk. But its coziness with the military, elitist attitudes toward rural Turkey, and opposition to some reforms designed to boost Turkey’s EU membership chances have driven many liberal supporters away. Many also accept that Erdogan’s party, in power since 2002, has been a better steward of economic and social reforms.

    For his part, Erdogan has alarmed liberals with his threats to scuttle Turkey’s longstanding alliance with Israel, his questioning of Washington’s international leadership, and his willingness to cultivate friendships with hardline Islamic nations like Iran and Syria.

    Increasingly, analysts who praised Erdogan for raising Turkey’s standing in the Middle East are now warning that the government is acting out of emotion not reason in its dealings with Israel and the West.

    “Unless someone says stop, the present atmosphere threatens to marginalize Turkey in the long term,” wrote Asli Aydintasbas, a columnist for liberal Milliyet newspaper.

    Overwhelming support for Erdogan in elections in 2007 “were not for Hamas but for a ‘western Muslim’ Turkey that increased its global weight both in the East and in the West,” Aydintasbas said.

    Military analysts have voiced concerns that Turkey’s new foreign policy is harming its interests, undermining its fight against autonomy-seeking Kurdish rebels.

    The United States has been providing intelligence on Kurdish rebel movements in northern Iraq, where a bulk of the rebels are in hiding, while Turkey uses drones recently purchased from Israel to spy on the guerrilla group.

    On Saturday, about 60 rebels attacked a military outpost on the Turkish-Iraqi border, killing nine soldiers, according to the military.

    The attack raised questions as to how they were able to reach the outpost undetected and some speculated that the United States may have withheld crucial intelligence.

    But Maj. Gen. Ferit Guler, secretary-general of the Turkish military, insisted that a successful intelligence cooperation with the United States was still in place.

    The military has long supported Turkey’s military alliance with Israel, which has provided crucial military equipment, such as the drones and modernized Turkish fighter jets and tanks.

    Erdogan insists it is committed to its alliance with the United States and NATO and that his government still seeks EU membership, although he has also accused European countries of having a “secret agenda” to keep Turkey out.

    Related articles

    • Turkey’s New Diplomacy
      International Herald Tribune – 1 day ago
    • Turkey: no Blue Stream gas to Israel for now
      Industrial Fuels and Power (blog) – 1 day ago
    • Turkish energy minister says no gas transportation to Israel via Blue Stream
      Trend News Agency – 2 days ago
    • More coverage (1) »
  • Wait and See Game for Turkey’s Enforcement of UN Sanctions on Iran

    Wait and See Game for Turkey’s Enforcement of UN Sanctions on Iran

    Dorian Jones | IstanbuL

    21 June 2010

    ahmedinajad erdogan 17may10 480 eng 300 eng

    Photo: AFP

    Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad flashes the V-sign for victory as Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan looks on after the Islamic republic inked a nuclear fuel swap deal in Tehran (File Photo – 17 May 2010)

    Related Articles

    • Turkey Troops, Kurdish Rebels Clash Near Iraq Border
    • US Defense Secretary: Europe Pushing Turkey ‘Eastward’
    • Israel Moves to Repair Relations With Turkey

    This month, Turkey voted against the United Nations Security Council’s fourth round of sanctions against Iran. With Turkey’s Islamic rooted government increasing its economic ties with Iran in the past few years, fears are arising that the pivotal Western ally is in danger of swinging eastward because of resistance in Europe to its bid for membership of the European Union.

    Despite growing international tensions over Iran’s nuclear energy program, the Turkish government has forged ahead with energy deals with Iran, expanding its dependency on energy with the nation.

    These deals put Turkey in a precarious situation: to enforce or not to enforce the UN sanctions imposed on its neighbor Iran.

    Turkey has long been seen as a bridge between East and West. But its belief that sanctions are ineffective and that there are dangers in pushing the Islamic republic into a corner is likely to change its relationship with Western nations.

    Earlier this month Turkish foreign minister Ahmet Davutoglu expressed concern over the existing sanctions against Iran.

    AP

    “Turkey and Iran’s trade volume is around $10 billion,” he says. “And it can rise to $30 billion if sanctions are lifted.”

    Iran’s energy resources are seen as important by Ankara to break its dependency on Russian energy.

    Iran expert Gokhan Cetinsayar of Sehir University says that in addition to its dependency on gas, there are other trade initiatives with Iran that are economically key to Turkey.

    “75,000 trucks going on between Turkey and Iran every year,” said Cetinsayar. “Now there are energy deals. You know how important the Iranian natural gas and all other agreements and initiatives are economically important for Turkey.

    With large families usually depending for their livelihoods on cargo trucks, its estimated as many a million Turkish people depend on Iranian trade.

    With its increasing economic ties with Iran, there are growing fears that Turkey will balk at enforcing the UN sanctions against Iran.

    Turkish foreign minister spokesman Burak Ozugergin says Turkey has already paid a heavy economic price for UN policies with another of its neighbors, Iraq.

    “At the beginning of the 90’s, the Turkish volume of trade with Iraq was around the 15 to 20 percent mark of our total volume of trade. The next year, after the imposition of sanctions, this trickled down to almost zero,” said Ozugergin. “Money is not everything. But at least if it did work then we might be able to say to our public, ‘look it was for a good a cause.’ But can we really honestly say that looking back? For Iran again we don’t think it will help to solve the nuclear issue and perhaps may work against it.”

    The new sanctions on Iran are expected to cut into the present $10 billion trade volume. It could possibly undermine its energy policy as well. But political scientist Nuray Mert of Istanbul University say some western nations may now not be able to depend on Turkey.

    “I was inclined to think that at the end of the day Turkey will join the club when it comes to realization of these sanctions,” she said. “But nowadays I can see the government is planning to avoid these sanctions. Because now we have Turkey signing a lot of economic agreements, against the policy of sanctions.”

    For now Turkey has remained circumspect over enforcing new sanctions. One foreign ministry official said “you will have to wait and see.” Analysts say Iran would probably reward any breaking of sanctions with lucrative energy deals. But the political cost could be high because of Turkey’s aspirations for joining the EU. The coming weeks will see Ankara facing a difficult a choice.

  • Turkey’s Hollow Prize

    Turkey’s Hollow Prize

    pic

    Freedom’s Edge

    Turkey’s Hollow Prize

    Claudia Rosett, 06.18.10, 11:21 AM EDT

    Washington’s Woodrow Wilson Center dishonors its own public service award.

    Canada Free Press
    June 19 2010

    By Claudia Rosett Friday, June 18, 2010
    – Forbes

    It’s time Congress pulled the plug on Washington’s taxpayer-subsidized
    Woodrow Wilson Center for International Scholars, which has turned
    itself into a global joke. With Turkey’s leaders coquetting as the new
    best bedfellows of Iran and embracing the terrorists of Hamas, the
    Wilson Center has just bestowed its `Public Service’ award on Turkey’s
    foreign minister, Ahmet Davutoglu.

    In tandem with rewarding Davutoglu for catalyzing `the development of
    Turkey’s foreign relations,’ the Wilson Center also honored a Turkish
    business tycoon, Ferit Sahenk, with its Woodrow Wilson Award for
    Corporate Citizenship. The two winners received their prizes at a
    banquet held Thursday evening at the plush Four Seasons Hotel in
    Istanbul.

    In a June 8 press release the Wilson Center’s president, former
    congressman Lee Hamilton, explained that Davutoglu and Sahenk had been
    chosen because `These two leaders personify the attributes we seek to
    honor at the Woodrow Wilson Center.’ I mean no insult to Sahenk’whose
    prizeworthy business skills I don’t question’but it’s hard to escape
    the conclusion that the chief attributes the Wilson Center has just
    sought to honor in Istanbul are antagonism toward American values
    (Davutoglu) and enormous amounts of money (Sahenk).

    Created in 1968 by an act of Congress, the Wilson Center describes
    itself on its website as a `nonpartisan institute,’ a `living,
    national memorial’ to President Woodrow Wilson, charged with
    `symbolizing and strengthening the fruitful relations between the
    world of learning and the world of public affairs.’ Functioning as a
    `public-private partnership,’ the Wilson Center in recent times has
    been receiving roughly one-third of its yearly operating funds from
    the U.S. government (in other words, from U.S. taxpayers). Thus
    credentialed by Congress and anchored in federal subsidies, it
    attracts the rest of its money from a global array of public and
    private sources. Its current annual expenses are budgeted at more than
    $37.3 million.

    Housed on prime real estate, just blocks from the White House, the
    Wilson Center occupies, ironically enough, a lavishly appointed
    eight-story wing of the Ronald Reagan International Trade Building. It
    has a big vestibule with polished granite and marble floors, some of
    Wilson’s words chiseled in stone, and multiple levels of roomy offices
    and meeting rooms, ample armchairs, a cafeteria and a private library.
    All this is supposed to serve the Center’s aim `to shed the light of
    the timeless on the timely.’

    >From this perch, with atrocious timing, the Wilson Center last August
    invited Davutoglu to receive its public service award this June, `in
    recognition of his lifelong service to the Turkish public.’

    This is a bizarre spin on Davutoglu’s major role in steering the
    Turkish state away from its former democratic allies such as the U.S.
    and Israel and toward its current collaboration with the tyrannies of
    Syria and Iran, and the Iranian-backed terrorists of Hamas. Author of
    a treatise titled `Strategic Depth,’ proposing a sweeping rethink of
    Turkish policy, Davutoglu has been a core player in Turkey’s
    increasingly anti-Western slant since Prime Minister Recep Tayyip
    Erdogan and his Islamic AK Party won power in 2002. In May 2009
    Davutoglu became foreign minister. Since then, Turkey’s shift toward
    Iran has achieved warp speed.

    In recent weeks Turkey’s leaders have backed a flotilla led by a
    terror-linked Turkish foundation, IHH, aiming to break Israel’s
    blockade against weapons reaching Iranian-backed terrorists in Gaza.
    Last month Turkey tried to deflect new sanctions on Iran, partnering
    in Tehran on a farcical uranium swap proposal with Brazil’s President
    Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva (winner last year of the Wilson Public
    Service award) and Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (candidate for
    next year’s Wilson award?). This month, in the United Nations Security
    Council, Turkey, along with Brazil, spurned the U.S. and voted against
    new sanctions on Iran.

    In all this Davutoglu has been a prime player, at one point likening
    the deaths of eight weapons-wielding Turkish `peace activists’ in the
    terror-linked Gaza flotilla to the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks that
    killed thousands of innocents in the U.S.

    These were just some of the offenses cited by Rep. Gary Ackerman (D.,
    N.Y.), chairman of the House Subcommittee on the Middle East and South
    Asia, in a June 15 letter urging Lee Hamilton to rescind the Wilson
    Center award to Davutoglu. Describing Turkey’s foreign policy under
    Davutoglu as `rife with illegality, irresponsibility and hypocrisy,’
    Ackerman highlighted Turkey’s continuing denial of the 1915 Armenian
    genocide and its current backing for both the genocidal regime in
    Sudan and the Holocaust-denying regime in Iran.

    Apparently that’s all OK with the Wilson Center, where `our
    nonpartisan work’ seems headed these days toward the global surrender
    of any principles whatsoever. A press officer there explained in an
    email this week that `Awardees are not chosen for their political
    views.’

    But it seems they are sometimes chosen for their fundraising
    potential. On that score, the spokeswoman in the same e-mail wrote
    that `These Awards Dinners have been critical for helping to raise
    some of the funding the Wilson Center needs.’ She continued, `In 2009,
    the Center identified Istanbul as an international city where a
    fundraising event of this kind would be viable.’

    Davutoglu’s co-honoree in Istanbul Thursday evening, Ferit Sahenk,
    happens to be one of the wealthiest men in Turkey. Head of the Dogus
    Holding business conglomerate founded by his father, Sahenk shows up
    on the Forbes list of World Billionaires with a net worth of $2.1
    billion.

    With the Wilson Center giving Sahenk its Award for Corporate
    Citizenship, have Sahenk or any of his Turkish cohorts pledged money
    to the Wilson Center? When I asked that question of the Center on
    Thursday afternoon, apparently no one could say , despite 12
    `development’ workers listed on the staff. I was passed along to
    another spokeswoman, who said she would look into it, but `People have
    to jump through hoops to get this information.’

    The way the Wilson Center puts it, Congress has been urging them `to
    raise more funding from private sources.’ Another way of looking at
    it, however, is that with Congress continuing to pour in money, the
    Wilson Center has been able to leverage its congressionally created
    and subsidized status into an ability to raise additional tens of
    millions all over the map’but to keep growing, it wants yet more.
    Among the top donors listed in the Center’s 2008-09 annual report,
    chipping in amounts for that period ranging from $100,000 to $2.5
    million apiece, are several that are themselves funded by U.S. tax
    dollars. These include the U.S. Agency for International Development,
    the U.S. State Department and the United Nations Development Program
    (which receives hundreds of millions annually from the U.S.
    government).

    Other top donors include: George Soros’s Open Society Institute, the
    Carnegie Corporation of New York, the Pew Charitable Trusts, the Exxon
    Mobil Corporation, the Swedish Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the
    Embassy of Mexico, Brazil’s Grupo EBX , South Korea’s LG Electronics,
    the Fellowship Fund for Pakistan and `Anonymous.’ United Airlines is
    listed as `The Official and Exclusive Airline Sponsor of the Woodrow
    Wilson Awards and the Woodrow Wilson Center.’

    Now comes the Davutoglu award, with its message that the Wilson Center
    in bestowing its favors is willing to treat even the most flagrantly
    anti-American views (and deeds) as irrelevant, while collecting money
    around the globe. Why should Congress keep fueling this morally blank,
    misleading and venal exercise with millions of American tax dollars?

  • ARMENIAN  ATTROCITIES  UPON  OTTOMAN  MOSLEMS

    ARMENIAN ATTROCITIES UPON OTTOMAN MOSLEMS

    SHT 9

    By Erkan Esmer, Ph.D., Prof. Engineer

    Armenians prospered greatly under the protection of Ottoman Turks. They were dubbed as the “Loyal Tribe” by the Ottoman Sultans. The Ottomans were late in accepting the Industrial Revolution. They preferred to stay as soldiers, farmers, and bureaucrats as was fashionable at the feudal era. They left the services, trade, banking, and industrial production to their Christian subjects (Greeks and armenians) who were a small segment of the population in Anatolia (Asia Minor). This made them very wealthy and powerful. Russian General Maievski’s 1890 map is presented in Figure 1 in the ensuing page, clearly shows that they were a small minority. Of course, the Russians naturally would inflate the Greek and armenian populations within the empire, because they had  invented the so called “Eastern Problem”. They under the pretext of protection of Christian Ottoman citizens, vied for conquest of Ottoman lands.

    When Russians attacked the Ottomans in 1877, they along with concurrence of European powers established Principality of Bulgaria. They advised the armenians that they could establish their own country in Eastern Anatolia. I doubt that they would ever allow them to have their own country. They had no intensions to do so, but wanted to use the armenians. Czarist Russia along with the help of American missionaries armed the armenians all over Anatolia. These terrorist forces were stationed  all over the Turkish mainland. {Fig. 2-15} These above mentioned facts are confirmed by August 23, 1895 New York Times article. They were united under the command of armenian terrorist groups Dashnaks and Hunchaks. The armenians’ barbaric atrocities and heinous crimes upon the Moslems were unspeakable. {Fig. 16-29} These massacres naturally angered the authorities and Moslem population who defended themselves. They knew that this would bring the wrath of European powers (super powers of the era), because Europeans wanted to dismember the Ottoman Empire for its fertile land, valuable mineral and oil resources (Iraq, Saudi Oil Fields). They finally achieved this goal at the end of World War I.

    During World War I, all of Turkish and Moslem young men were not home, but were fighting for their homeland in many different fronts. Only Women, children, and old Men lived in Ottoman Anatolian provinces, then. All of them were unarmed!!! Many of the armenians who were inducted into Ottoman forces, ran away with their weapons. The armenian cowards butchered these unarmed civilians. They acted as scouts/vanguards for the Russian forces. They ambushed Ottoman forces, cut down the telegraph lines, which caused a lot of havoc at the time. The Ottoman government had to relocate them from the war zone to provinces where there were no fighting with the means available to them at the time. {Fig. 30-33}. Many armenians migrated to other countries such as USA, France, and England, enhancing their lives tremendously. Since this barbaric tribe of armenians left the corpses of Moslems rot in open air, since they drowned them in wells, or threw the corpses in creeks or rivers, this caused a severe cholera epidemic which took many lives, including their own. Even though armenians and Russians massacred about 2,500,000 Moslems, where as, armenian losses were between 36,000 and 125,000,  this is the so-called “ARMENIAN GENOCIDE”.

    “Photographs are from Turkish Armed Forces archives or my own post card collection”

    SHT 2

    SHT 3

    SHT 6

    SHT 10

    SHT 11

    SHT 12

    SHT 15

    SHT 21

    SHT 23