Tag: Nagorno-Karabakh

  • No government has the power to reopen Turkey-Armenia borders

    No government has the power to reopen Turkey-Armenia borders

     
     

    [ 08 Apr 2009 14:40 ]
    Ankara. Mayis Alizadeh – APA. “As the reopening of the borders with Armenia is not only Turkey’s problem, Azerbaijan can not stand aside.

    Diplomatic attempts should be accepted normally,” one of the leaders of the struggle against Armenian genocide claims, former chief of Turkish Historical Society, Professor Yusuf Halacoglu told APA’s Turkey bureau. He said it was very important to solve the problem through discussions.
    “Of course, nobody should expect Turkey to reopen the borders, while Azerbaijani territories are under occupation. It will cause severe reaction of Turkish public. I do not think that the government will do it. Tats why, there is no ground to worry. Azerbaijan should hold discussions on this issue with Turkey. Apart from Azerbaijan and Turkey, the United States is also interested in this issue. In order to establish stability in the region the US wants Armenia to be involved in the agreements signed up to now and has some demands from Turkey. The main thing is – no agreement can be signed, unless the occupied Azerbaijani territories are released and Nagorno Karabakh obtains its previous status,” he said.

    Yusuf Halacoglu repeated the words he said in Gars a few days ago.
    “I repeated there that our borders are our honor. There will be no peace in the region, until Armenia releases the occupied Azerbaijani territories, because in this case everybody will occupy the territory of another country. Basing on this logic, Turkey may also occupy Armenia. So, everybody should respect borders. If we do not admit the so-called genocide, Armenia may slander as much as it wishes. Armenia may not accept our borders, either. Armenia has no power to change out borders. What will happen, if Armenia does not accept our borders, while the whole world accepts? Therefore, Armenia should release the occupied territories. The discussions following it are much easier,” he said.

  • The Alliance of Civilizations Forum: A Major Test for Turkish Diplomacy

    The Alliance of Civilizations Forum: A Major Test for Turkish Diplomacy

    The Alliance of Civilizations Forum: A Major Test for Turkish Diplomacy

    Publication: Eurasia Daily Monitor Volume: 6 Issue: 67
    April 8, 2009
    By: Saban Kardas

    On April 6-7, Istanbul hosted the second United Nations Alliance of Civilizations (UNAOC) forum, co-chaired by Turkey and Spain under the auspices of the UN to foster international dialogue and cooperation. The forum was attended by five heads of state, 26 foreign ministers, 11 ministers and high-level officials from 12 international and regional organizations, providing an opportunity for Ankara to discuss bilateral relations with its neighbors and showcase Turkey’s growing international profile (Anadolu Ajansi, April 7).

    The UNAOC began in 2004 following the Madrid bombings, as part of Spanish Prime Minister Jose Luiz Rodriguez Zapatero’s aim of building closer links between the Western and Islamic worlds, and combating terrorism through dialogue rather than force. Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan supported this idea, which became a joint Spanish-Turkish initiative. In addition to several working meetings, its first forum was hosted by Spain in January 2008 and around 100 countries have joined the organization (www.aocistanbul.org; www.unaoc.org).

    The second UNAOC forum reflected the high value placed on resolving common problems through dialogue. In their addresses, world leaders also emphasized the promotion of mutual respect, tolerance and diversity, to overcome conflict and achieve peaceful coexistence (www.ntvmsnbc.com, April 7). UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon highlighted the possible conflict prevention role of the platform: “All too often, the United Nations must deal with fires after they break out. Through the UNAOC, we can stamp out the sparks before they catch” (Today’s Zaman, April 7).

    Participants submitted their national plans and regional strategies for joint projects and agreed on developing programs to increase communication among the young and facilitate greater access to information technology to promote intercultural understanding. Additional programs will support academic research, organize workshops to study the challenges of doing business in a multicultural environment, and develop joint media educational programs (Cihan Haber Ajansi, April 7).

    Moreover, the UNAOC plays a major part in the foreign policy agenda of Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan and his governing Justice and Development Party (AKP), which has supported the initiative since its inception. The project has been used by the AKP to advance its political vision, emphasizing dialogue and consensus in conducting Turkey’s foreign relations. This is an extension of their own transformation from a more doctrinaire, anti-Western Islamic movement to a pro-EU, moderate conservative party. Fostering international dialogue is regarded as vindication of the AKP’s image as a movement which synthesizes Western and Islamic values. Most importantly, Turkey’s leading role in this new forum is valuable for the AKP’s leadership, offering a high profile opportunity to represent the Muslim world, which they view as a core mission (Radikal, November 12, 2006).

    The AKP government has recently undertaken several initiatives reflecting their belief that Turkey could serve as a bridge between East and West, and advocate the rights of the Islamic world. For instance, Turkey’s policy during the Gaza crisis, or its position over appointing the new Secretary-General of NATO was driven by such considerations. Critics allege that Turkey might be drifting away from the transatlantic community and becoming more Middle Eastern. Nonetheless, the AKP has insisted that the party remains committed to the country’s Western orientation, and these new openings within the Islamic world should be interpreted as complementary to Western interests in the strategically vital regions surrounding Turkey. The AKP also highlights its successful foreign policy by pointing to the praise Turkey has received from the international community, including the EU and the United States, for its contributions to global and regional peace through such projects.

    These high-level gatherings serve Turkish diplomacy in other ways. On the sidelines of the forum, several bilateral and multilateral talks took place, which enabled Turkish leaders to discuss controversial foreign policy issues. President Barack Obama made a brief appearance at the UNAOC reception on the first day, expressing U.S. backing for Turkey’s efforts. He reiterated his support for rapprochement between Turkey and Armenia, urging the foreign ministers of both countries to finalize the normalization process. Foreign Minister Ali Babacan, in addition to meeting his Armenian counterpart, held separate talks with the Greek Foreign Minister Dora Bakoyannis, to discuss ways to resolve the Cyprus issue (Cihan Haber Ajansi, April 7).

    The forum, however, also demonstrated Ankara’s current dilemma as it seeks to improve its relations with Armenia. Azerbaijan’s President Ilham Aliyev declined an invitation from President Abdullah Gul to attend the UNAOC, preferring instead to send his daughter to represent the country. The Turkish media claimed that Aliyev was boycotting the UNAOC forum “in reaction to Turkish-Armenian reconciliation, prior to a breakthrough on the problem of Karabakh” (Hurriyet Daily News, April 6). Although Babacan denied this during his press briefing, arguing that Turkey and Azerbaijan were still “one nation, two states,” Ankara’s inability to ensure higher level representation from Baku coupled with Aliyev’s recent statements, reflect underlying divisions between the two countries. As Turkey builds bridges across cultures and normalizes relations with its neighbors, it risks damaging its traditionally closer relationship with Azerbaijan.

  • Azerbaijani opposition against opening of borders

    Azerbaijani opposition against opening of borders

    Baku. Elnur Mammadli – APA. Musavat Party made a statement on the talks held on reopening of Turkey-Armenia borders, the party’s press service told APA. The statement expresses concern over Turkey’s establishing relations with Armenia and notes that unilateral reopening of borders is inadmissible.
    “Turkey’s paradoxical step towards Armenia, which does not give up territorial claims and genocide claims, will not have positive influence on its national interests, regional development or solution to Karabakh conflict. The developments may damage the relations of Turkey with its ally, friend, brother Azerbaijan,” he said.

    The party notes that some forces may take advantage of the problem in Turkey-Azerbaijan relations. Musavat calls on Turkish government not to give grounds to the forces interested in damaging friendship between the two countries.
    “Musavat Party, which is concerned over the state of Turkey-Azerbaijan relations, calls on politicians and media to be more delicate. We believe that Turkey-Azerbaijan relations will stand the test and strengthen,” the statement says.

    Azerbaijan National Independence Party in its statement expresses concern over the discussions on the reopening of the borders. The party considers that the reopening of borders will not establish peace and welfare in thee region, but create serious obstacles in the settlement of the conflicts.
    “Reopening of the borders will pave the way for Armenia’s militarism policy and new territorial claims,” the party says.
    The party considers that being strategic ally and friend Turkey should take into account Azerbaijan’s interests.
    “Reopening of the borders will damage the Turkic world and Azerbaijan-Turkey relations,” the statement says.

    Azerbaijan National Democratic Party also made a statement. The party says if the borders will be reopened, Armenian-Russian military-aggressive base will strengthen. The party notes that realization of this probability will mean great political victory of Armenia, damage the national interest of Azerbaijan and Turkey, impede peace, Turkic world project.
    “The party blames Turkish authorities for the project of anti-Turkish forces like the reopening of Turkey-Armenia borders. AKP government is executing anti-Turkish policy of Armenians, Persians, Russians and West,” he said.

  • Obama, Aliev Discuss Turkish-Armenian Ties

    Obama, Aliev Discuss Turkish-Armenian Ties

     

     By Emil Danielyan

    U.S. President Barack Obama has defended an unconditional normalization of relations between Armenia and Turkey in a phone call with his Azerbaijani counterpart Ilham Aliev, who is strongly opposed to such prospect.

    The two leaders spoke late Tuesday after Obama ended a two-day visit to Turkey during which he urged Ankara and Yerevan to complete talks aimed at establishing diplomatic relations between the two neighbors and reopening their land border.

    “The President had a good conversation with President Aliev,” the White House said in a statement. “He reaffirmed U.S commitment to a strong relationship with Azerbaijan and to supporting progress toward a resolution of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.”

    “The President also underscored the importance of Turkish-Armenian reconciliation, which will lead to greater peace and security in the region,” added the statement.

    Aliev’s office also said that Turkish-Armenian relations were high on the agenda of the “frank conversation.” “Barack Obama informed the Azerbaijani leader about steps taken by the United States concerning Turkey-Armenia relations,” it said in a statement. “President Ilham Aliev brought the Azerbaijani state’s position on the issue to the U.S. president’s attention.”

    Azerbaijani leaders have expressed serious concern at reports that Armenia and Turkey are close to normalizing their historically strained relations after months of high-level negotiations. Foreign Minister Elmar Mammadyarov warned last week that Ankara will act against the national interests of its closest Turkic ally if it reopens the Turkish-Armenian border before a resolution of the Karabakh conflict. The current Turkish government’s apparent readiness to stop linking improved ties with Armenia to Karabakh reportedly led Aliev to cancel his participation in a UN-sponsored international conference held in Istanbul on Monday and Tuesday.

    Obama spoke with the Armenian and Turkish foreign ministers on the sidelines of the conference and, according to a senior U.S. official quoted by Western news agencies, urged them to “complete an agreement with dispatch.” Addressing the Turkish parliament earlier on Monday, the U.S. president made a case for an open border between the two estranged nations.

    According to “Hurriyet Daily News,” Obama and Foreign Minister Eduard Nalbandian held a bilateral meeting before being joined by Foreign Ministers Ali Babacan of Turkey and Micheline Calmy-Rey of Switzerland. The Armenian Foreign Ministry could not be reached for comment on this report on Wednesday. It is also unclear whether Nalbandian and Babacan held talks in a tête-à-tête format in Istanbul.

    Nalbandian insisted on Sunday that the Karabakh dispute has not been on the agenda of the Turkish-Armenian negotiations and said statements to the contrary made by Turkish leaders could undermine the ongoing dialogue. He appeared to react to Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s Friday remark that “as long as the Nagorno-Karabakh issue is not resolved, it is not possible for us to reach a healthy solution concerning Armenia.”

  • Azerbaijani-Turkish Businessmen against opening of borders

    Azerbaijani-Turkish Businessmen against opening of borders

    Baku. Rashad Suleymanov–APA. On April 7, Union of Azerbaijani-Turkish Businessmen issued statement on a protest against the opening of Turkey-Armenia borders, APA reports. If the plans of Armenians and their supporters are realized, the strategic superiorities of Azerbaijan and Turkey will be broken up, political, economic and social relations between Azerbaijan and Turkey will be damaged seriously, which will lead to the weakening of opportunities for the energy resources control in the region. The opening of the borders will be only in favor of Armenia and some third countries supporting Armenia while Armenia is not leaving the territorial and “genocide” compensation claims against Turkey, not leaving the estimation of this issue to the scientists and historians, not stopping use it as a “tool of political pressure” against Turkey, not stopping occupation of Azerbaijan’s internationally-recognized lands, not allowing the refugees and displaced persons to return home”.

  • Milli Majlis against opening of borders

    Milli Majlis against opening of borders

     

     
     

    [ 07 Apr 2009 19:35 ]
    Baku. Elnur Mammadli–APA. Azerbaijani political parties represented in Milli Majlis (Azerbaijani Parliament) held joint meeting on Tuesday in a protest against the opening of Turkey-Armenia borders, APA reports.

    Representatives of the parties of New Azerbaijan, Social Welfare, Ana Vatan, Great System, Justice, Umid, All Azerbaijan Popular Front, Citizen Solidarity, Citizen Unity and Democratic Reforms attended the meeting. The parliamentarians noted that Turkey’s talks toward the opening of borders and establishing of diplomatic relation with Armenia could seriously damage the Turkey-Azerbaijan relations and the idea of Turkic unity completely. The opening of Turkey-Armenia borders was estimated as a support to the aggressors and it was noted that this action would negatively impact on the peace talks over the Nagorno Karabakh conflict. The participants of the meeting called on the Turkish authorities to avoid this action. The political parties issued a joint statement.
    Azerbaijani people and public community concern over the Turkey’s talks toward the opening of borders and establishing of diplomatic relations with Armenia and protest against it, the statement reads. “Respecting the Turkey’s independent foreign policy, we would like to state that on the back of occupation of 20 percent of Azerbaijani lands by Armenia, turning of more than one million people into refugees and displaced persons, killing of thousands of peaceful people, committing Khojali Genocide against the humanity, such action will be a support to the Armenia’s occupant policy, false “genocide” claims and its actions to create military-political tensions and humanitarian crisis in the region. It will be painful damage on the Turkey-Azerbaijan brotherhood and on the ideas of Turkic solidarity. It will be credulity to think that Armenians will leave their insidious intentions of territorial claims against Turkey on the plea of so-called “Armenian genocide” after the opening of the borders”. The authors of the statement say that the policy aiming to establish peace and stability in the South Caucasus declared by the Turkish authorities can not only be restricted to the reopening of borders with Armenia.
    “The only guarantee of stability in the region should be withdrawal of Armenian armed forces from the occupied territories and restoration of Azerbaijan’s territorial integrity. Otherwise, the reopening of the borders with Armenia will become a factor having negative impact on the ongoing processes and peace talks in the region and serving to increase tension and confrontation,” the statement says.

    The parties signing the statement once more note that they attach great importance to Turkey-Azerbaijan strategic partnership and, protest against the steps taken by Turkish authorities for the reopening of borders with Armenia and state that such an act is not in line with friendly relations between the countries and peoples and that this policy contradicts the interests of Turkish Republic. The parties call on Turkish authorities not to establish relations or open borders with Armenia.