Tag: Museum of Innocence

  • Burgeoning art scene in Istanbul despite little state funding

    Burgeoning art scene in Istanbul despite little state funding

    Tahira Yaqoob

    “For me,” wrote Orhan Pamuk of his beloved Istanbul, “it has always been a city of ruins and of end-of-empire melancholy.”

    AD20130105807723-The_Museum_of_I

    But huzun, the Arabic-derived Turkish word used by the Nobel-prizewinning novelist to describe that sense of spiritual loss and longing, could be the key to the city’s rebirth.

    Istanbul’s contemporary art scene is enjoying a moment, thanks to a rash of art fairs, dozens of exhibition spaces funded by the corporate sector and private investors and newfound recognition for Turkish artists overseas.

    Yet while its reputation is being built on the fresh perspectives of its artists, poised at the crossroads of East and West, it is Istanbul’s legacy as the stronghold of one of the world’s greatest historical superpowers which is set to buoy the art market.

    Since the Ottoman Empire first tumbled into ruin in the 19th century, and with it crumbled its stature as an international seat of art and culture, Turkish artists have looked to the West with students dispatched to Europe to learn their trade.

    via Burgeoning art scene in Istanbul despite little state funding – The National.

    more:

  • Postcard from Istanbul: Objects of desire

    Lindy Percival

    In the first of an occasional series from afar, Lindy Percival enters Orhan Pamuk’s literary labyrinth.

    Objects of desire

    Orhan Pamuk and his objects. Photo: Refik Anadol and Innocence Foundation

    IN A city of dizzying contrasts – where East straddles West, past collides with present, and Christianity and Islam maintain an uneasy truce – Istanbul’s newest museum teeters on the altogether more intriguing divide between truth and fiction.

    The Museum of Innocence, which opened in April 2012, is the physical manifestation of the celebrated 2008 novel of the same name by Nobel prize-winning Turkish author Orhan Pamuk.

    The novel, set in 1970s Istanbul, charts the ill-fated love affair between its narrator, Kemal B – a wealthy businessman – and Fusun, a distant relative with whom he becomes infatuated. A tale of obsessive longing, the novel – and the museum that bears its name – explores the city’s history via objects collected by Kemal to remind him of his beloved, a young woman whose fate is sealed when she defies social mores by taking a lover out of wedlock.

    Pamuk documents his extraordinary parallel endeavour – collecting objects for his museum that will inform the lives of his imaginary characters – in his subsequent, non-fiction book The Innocence of Objects, now available locally.

    Advertisement

    The Innocence of Objects follows Pamuk as he scours the city’s junk shops, all the while searching for the ideal building to house both his fictional heroine and his mounting collection. When he at last finds ”a dainty building worthy of Fusun”, he decides: ”Yes, Fusun had certainly lived here; I was sure of it.”

    In this enchanting place where Pamuk’s imagination makes its leap from page to physical reality, an elaborate literary adventure unfolds. Inside a narrow, five-storey house in a backstreet of the increasingly fashionable Beyoglu district, the museum’s rusted keys, black-and-white photographs, stopwatches and film clips evoke a glamour and gentility far removed from the bustling metropolis that is modern-day Istanbul.

    ”Putting these things together in a box,” Pamuk writes in The Innocence of Objects, ”measuring every centimetre, and making the slightest change in search of a particular harmony, made me feel as if I were building a world – just as I do when I write a novel.”

    Objects are arranged in wood cabinets – or ”vitrines” – that correspond to chapters in the novel.

    Chapter one is represented by the butterfly earring that falls from Fusun’s ear as the couple make love for the first time. The death of Kemal’s father in chapter 47 is told through a crowded display of coins, cufflinks and ties. Across an entire wall, lipstick-stained cigarette butts smoked by Fusun between 1976 and 1984 are pinned down like a collection of exotic insects. Pamuk’s accompanying caption reads: ”Kemal was proud of his 4213 cigarette butts, and whenever he brought them out he would tell me their stories. He carefully dated each one, making additional notes here and there, some of which I used in the novel. Here you will find the relevant notes under each cigarette butt, written out in my own handwriting, as Kemal requested.”

    Like the poetic assemblages of American artist Joseph Cornell, each cabinet invites the viewer on an intriguing visual journey whose destination is never clear.

    Pamuk playfully offers up the ”evidence” of his characters’ lives: newspaper clippings, a dress worn by Fusun during her nerve-racked driving lessons, even her driver’s licence, albeit with face blurred. In one cabinet, a map of Istanbul charts the scenes of key events in the novel as if they really happened. Newspaper photographs of ”fallen” women, their eyes covered by black bands, speak of polite society’s unforgiving nature.

    ”Because the press used the same device in photographs of adulteresses, rape victims and prostitutes,” Pamuk writes, ”the photographs of women with black bands over their eyes were so numerous that reading a Turkish newspaper in those days was like wandering through a masquerade.”

    The novel traces the beginning of Fusun’s own fall to her entry in a local beauty pageant, an event captured in a newspaper clipping of a swimsuit-clad beauty in vitrine No.36.

    Amid so many intriguing falsehoods, the visitor can only guess at where storytelling begins and history ends. The museum’s lovingly displayed objects reveal themselves as props in an elaborate game, a series of puzzles that can never be solved. As a fellow visitor commented: ”It’s really cheeky.” Cheeky indeed, but also undeniably poignant.

    In the tiny upstairs bedroom where Kemal ends his days, surrounded by a tricycle, suitcase, bedside table and slippers, Pamuk writes: ”Between 2000 and 2007, Kemal Basmaci lived in this room, where Orhan Pamuk sat and listened to his story. Kemal Basmaci passed away on 12 April 2007.” Nearby, pages from the novel’s original manuscript, written between 2002 and 2008, along with empty pen cartridges and sketches showing how items should be displayed in the museum, point once again to the nature of obsession, both Kemal’s and his creator’s.

    Surrounded by crumbling houses and the usual rubble of Istanbul’s streets, the Museum of Innocence stands as a lovely curio and elaborate love letter to a time of beauty and hope.

    Its cabinets demand order from the ephemera of the city’s history, corralling the discarded and apparently meaningless into a universal tale of yearning and loss. As though the scattered lines of history have been picked up and rearranged into visual poetry.

    ■ The Museum of Innocence is open Tues-Sun. Free entry with a copy of The Museum of Innocence.

    The Innocence of Objects by Orhan Pamuk, is published by Abrams, $45.

    Read more:
  • Istanbul: Journey to Another World

    Istanbul: Journey to Another World

    Istanbul: Journey to Another World

    by Julian Loose

    A Trip to the Museum of Innocence

    09 Photo 27 04 2012 06 30 22 e1336154769241For many readers, a first visit to Istanbul can seem an oddly familiar experience, reminding us at every turn of the writing of Orhan Pamuk; we recognise the great mosques and the old wooden buildings, the ships on the Bosphorus and the hectic modern streets.

    The Bosphorus

    Pamuk says he became the unofficial laureate of Istanbul almost by accident, simply by recording the world he knew. Certainly his spectacular success has given him emblematic status, with all the mixed benefits this brings. But grand comparisons to other city writers – to Joyce, Proust, Dostoyevsky – have not daunted his ambition to push his association with Istanbul even further. Last week saw the opening of the ‘Museum of Innocence‘ – the culmination of a project that has shadowed his novel of the same name from the very start.

    The museum is the result of years of planning and hard work, attention to detail and creative argument on the part of Pamuk and his team of artists and designers. From this week, you can walk through the door of an unremarkable house in a back street of Istanbul’s Nişantaşı district – and enter the world of his novel. Orhan is surely the first writer to push an entire house through the membrane that usually separates imagination and reality.

    The Museum of Innocence is a very unusual love story. For all its great melodrama and set pieces, this is a novel which excites the reader most during the long periods where nothing much happens, and we are treated instead to rich digressions on countless aspects of bourgeois Istanbuli life. It is a kind of time machine which transports us back to the seventies, to an Istanbul which is a poorer, more isolated and more individual city than that of today.

    To visit Turkey now is to witness a dynamic country increasingly confident in its new leadership role, boosted by an economy growing faster than most of Europe. In Istanbul itself, countless Starbucks and even a Trump Tower shopping mall are just a small part of the construction boom that is reshaping the city. Turkey’s writers and artists have evidently assumed a new cultural confidence too, thanks in no small measure to Orhan Pamuk’s international recognition.

    The museum takes part in this modern resurgence, but at the same time turns its back on it. Once inside, we are surrounded by the ephemera of a lost and undervalued period: the glasses of linden tea, the salt cellars, the football cards, the newspapers with their adverts and gossip columns, the food, the shoes, the clocks, the movie kisses, the kitsch ornamental dogs, children’s dolls and tricycles, the quince graters and cigarette butts. Most of these objects are placed within ‘vitrines’ or cases, one to each chapter, and all set beautifully within the larger casement that is the house itself. By their placement and associations, and with their superb titles (’57: On Being Unable to Stand Up and Leave’), the objects generate the magical electrical field of a Joseph Cornell box.

    It is difficult to distinguish the success of this museum from the novel that is its twin. Each lends the other both substance and an air of intangible melancholy. Indeed, the novel was itself originally conceived as a museum catalogue, although this proved impossible in narrative terms. Pamuk will, however, be publishing a catalogue to the museum proper, later this year. Again, this will not be a straightforward exercise. The museum is – quite deliberately – left unfinished. Some boxes are not yet arranged to the author’s satisfaction, and are shielded with curtains like miniature theatres. And Orhan has talked playfully of adding to the museum, although it is not clear whether this means he will also be adding to the book.

    The official museum website suggests that visitors do not necessarily need to be familiar with the novel. What would it be like to climb up through the floors of this memory palace without having first read the book? The boxes and displayed artefacts suggest an obsessive love, although it might not be clear if the object of devotion is the mysterious woman Fusun (who never shows her face) or the city of Istanbul (which certainly does, in a thousand details). A casual visitor would remain unaware that some of the documentary material in the displays is itself a fiction – that the splendid ‘Jenny Colon’ handbag is a kind of double fake, that the yellowing newspaper articles are in truth recently printed, or that the vintage clip of the advertising film for the drink ‘Meltem’ features a young German model currently working in Turkey.

    But for the reader of Orhan’s book, the effect is more than uncanny. To follow the map in the front of the Museum of Innocence up the winding street of Çukurcuma Caddesi, to present a copy of the novel to the guard for his official stamp and for free entry to the museum – exactly as you are urged to do by the story’s hero Kemal Basmaci – is to complete an extraordinary circuit, and to feel that you have arrived at an essential destination.

    via Istanbul: Journey to Another World : The Thought Fox.

  • The Success of Orhan Pamuk’s Museum of Innocence

    The Success of Orhan Pamuk’s Museum of Innocence

    A Kaleidoscope of Charms

    By ANDREW FINKEL

    04iht latitude turkey art blog480 v2

    Orhan Pamuk reflected in a display at the Museum of Innocence in Istanbul on April 27.Jodi Hilton for The New York TimesOrhan Pamuk reflected in a display at the Museum of Innocence in Istanbul on April 27.

    ISTANBUL — “We are all diminished by the success of our friends” is a saying that lies at the bedrock of the politics of envy. If true, it means that I, along with fellow squad members of my high school junior-varsity basketball team, have every reason to feel just a few centimeters high. Only one of us, Orhan Pamuk, has gone on to win a Nobel Prize.

    That I manage to keep my own envy under control is the result of having watched Orhan swim in a sea of resentment far deeper than I could possibly imagine.

    In December 2005, I used those long-dormant basketball skills to elbow my way through the crush of an Istanbul courtroom to watch him answer charges of “publicly denigrating Turkish identity.” The trial was like an absurd scene from one of his novels, the result of an off-the-cuff remark to a Swiss reporter that no one in Turkey spoke of the deaths of a million Armenians or of 30,000 Kurds.

    This was enough to turn him into a hated figure for the Turkish right and a pawn in the ultranationalist game to alienate Turkey from Europe. Yet in many ways far more shocking than this mob fury was the assumption that made the rounds at polite dinner parties that Orhan was a rebel with only one cause: that all the fuss, even the death threats, was being stage-managed to impress his foreign critics.

    Last week I braved another crowd on Orhan Pamuk’s behalf. This time it was to attend the opening of a museum he sponsored and curated. It bears the name of his novel “The Museum of Innocence,’’ a tale of tragic and obsessive love.

    The book was originally conceived as a museum compendium of everyday objects —mementos that the narrator purloins from his former mistress over a series of years, from an earring to the charred ends of the cigarettes she smokes. Though the finished novel took a different form, its author set about collecting the endless bric-a-brac of which he writes, plundering flea markets around the Cukurcuma, a neighborhood of Istanbul where he had bought a small house.

    He became determined to tell the story twice, first with words, then with objects.

    Alongside the publication of the book, he set out to create an actual museum very different from the ones with columned porticos that narrate the history of nations. This one would be located in the backstreets of the human psyche, tease our memories and test, as Orhan put it at the press conference opening the museum, “our reactions to reality.”

    The narrative begins in the 1970s, and the objects, lovingly and thematically arranged in display cabinets for each of the book’s 83 chapters, are a catalogue of the kaleidoscopic charms of Istanbul’s bourgeoisie: soda bottles, newspaper photos of “shamed” women who defied the strict sexual mores of the time, with a black line to conceal their eyes, toiletries that adorn a wet sink. Near the entrance is a stunning tableau of 4,213 cigarette butts pinned like butterflies to a board, the legend of each one annotated by hand.

    It is manic, an example of art imitating art, but at the same time it is breathtaking, perplexing, thought-provoking and everything that conceptual art aspires to but so rarely succeeds at.

    “It is the first museum based on a novel,” Orhan said at the press conference. It is not intended as a tribute to his book but meant to work independently. Being a first, he added, is not enough. “Like literature, art should make the familiar look strange, the ordinary look beautiful.” Packing this all into a small house was no less complex than “designing a submarine.”

    It took years and cost the $1.5 million winnings of a Nobel Prize. So why did he do it?

    “It makes me happy,” he said. And I know what he means. It made me feel happy, too, and happier still to discover you can’t feel happy and envious at the same time.

    Andrew Finkel has been a foreign correspondent in Istanbul for over 20 years, as well as a columnist for Turkish-language newspapers. He is the author of the book “Turkey: What Everyone Needs to Know.”

    via The Success of Orhan Pamuk’s Museum of Innocence – NYTimes.com.

  • Celebrating ordinary life

    Celebrating ordinary life

    Nobel laureate Orhan Pamuk realizes a long-held dream.

    ISTANBUL: Nobel prize-winning Turkish writer Orhan Pamuk realized a long-nurtured dream yesterday with the opening of an actual “Museum of Innocence”— a collection of relics of a half-century of ordinary life as depicted in his 2008 novel of the same name.

    Pamuk set out “not to do a spectacular or monumental museum but something in the backstreets, something that represents the daily life of the city,” he told a news conference after a press preview.

    Situated in a bright, wine-red building in the district of Cukurcuma, the Museum of Innocence houses real and fabricated artifacts from everyday Turkish life between 1950 and 2000, in an homage both to the novel and to Pamuk’s Istanbul.

    “Our daily lives are honorable, and their objects should be preserved. It’s not all about the glories of the past,” he said. “It’s the people and their objects that count.”

    He conceived of the museum more than a decade ago, at the same time he came up with the idea for the novel. A New York Times bestseller, “The Museum of Innocence” was his first book after winning the 2006 Nobel prize for literature.

    The book tells the story of Kemal, who hoards ordinary items to recapture the happiness he felt during a passionate but ill-fated love affair.

    The real life museum contains odds and ends that Pamuk collected from junk shops, family and other donors. There are china dog figurines, old shaving kits and a wind-up film projector. A toothbrush collection, which features in the novel, was contributed by its real-life owner.

    Pride of place goes to Kemal’s mistress’ 4,213 cigarette butts, lovingly dated, archived and gently pinned to a canvas that occupies a full wall. Pamuk described the painstaking process of vacuuming out the tobacco to prevent worms.

    The space was originally meant to open with the book’s publication, but was beset with delays. It took Pamuk—working closely with a team of architects, artists and product designers—another four years to complete the project.

    He declined to specify the exact cost of the museum. Royalties from the book will go towards upkeep.

    While the project is distinctly personal, Pamuk insisted it is not autobiographical.

    Obsessed with love

    His protagonist Kemal is far too obsessed with his love and his compulsive hoarding to pay much attention to the social and political upheaval around him. His story takes place in Istanbul in the 1970s, a decade bookended with coups.

    Pamuk, 59, is among Turkey’s best selling writers. His work, including “My Name Is Red,” “The Black Book” and the memoir “Istanbul,” has been translated into some 60 languages.

    He was charged with “insulting Turkishness” in 2005 for remarks he made about the World War One massacre of Armenians and the state’s fight against Kurdish separatism since 1984. He was acquitted.

    Pamuk is now at work on a new book told from the view of a street vendor eking out a living in one of sprawling Istanbul’s shantytowns. His first book, 1982′s “Cevdet Bey and His Sons,” is now being made into a serial for television.—Reuters

    via Celebrating ordinary life | Free Malaysia Today.