Tag: Leeds

  • UK Jimmy Savile  sex abuse spread far and wide

    UK Jimmy Savile sex abuse spread far and wide

    jimmy-savileThe Operation Yewtree report shows how Savile’s victims ranged from eight to 47 years old, including 174 females and 40 males.

    Police have released a UK map outlining the horrific geographical range of Jimmy Savile’s ‘predatory’ sex offending.

    A report released by the Met Police and NSPCC today details the huge extent of Savile’s sex abuse, which spread far and wide across

    The Operation Yewtree report shows how Savile’s victims ranged from eight to 47 years old, including 174 females and 40 males.

    It emerged that 50 of his attacks took place at hospitals, 33 at TV or radio stations, and 14 at schools.

    But presenting the daunting range of facts and figures underlying the catalogue of offences, Britain’s biggest children’s charity, the NSPCC, said “behind every number is a person who suffered”.

    The shocking police report also reveals that Savile was at his most prolific in the south east – he committed 43 offences in the Metropolitan Police area, and 30 in Thames Valley.

    A further 34 of the Leeds presenter’s offences took place in the West Yorkshire, along with 14 in Great Manchester.

    Here is a snapshot of victims who came forward to reveal their experiences:

    1960 – A 10-year-old boy saw Savile outside a hotel and asked for his autograph. They went into the hotel reception where he was seriously sexually assaulted.

    1965 – A 14-year-old girl met Savile in a nightclub. She later visited his home and was raped.

    1972
     – A 12-year-old boy and two female friends attended a recording of Top of the Pops. During a break in filming Savile groped the boy’s genitals and the breasts of his two friends.

    1973
     – A 16-year-old female hospital patient was befriended by Savile. He led her to an office where he kissed her, touched her inappropriately and then subjected her to a sexual assault.

    1974
     – Savile took a 14-year-old schoolgirl for a drive in his car and seriously sexually assaulted her.

    2009
     – A 43-year-old woman was sexually assaulted by Savile when he put his hand up her skirt while talking to her on a train journey between Leeds and London.

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Yahoo News

  • War of words

    War of words

    wsc160The killing of two Leeds fans in Turkey was a shock to David O’Byrne, one of the first journalists on the scene. Here he describes the reaction in Istanbul

    I’m still in shock. I’ve lived in Istanbul for 12 years – for ten years within walking distance of Taksim Square where the two Leeds United supporters were murdered on April 5. And I don’t understand why it happened.

    Taksim itself is dull, but surrounded by a labyrinth of narrow back streets crammed with cafés, bars and kebab houses. It’s trendy and wild, but usually remarkably safe.

    That evening I was in a bar less than 300 metres from the square. I knew nothing about what had happened until 11pm, about an hour after the stabbings, and then only thanks to a chance encounter with another English journalist. At the nearby hospital we found two English fans: one crying, the other strutting and aggressive. Requests for information were met with an invitation to get lost and an obscene gesture for the Turkish police and TV cameras.

    I have since seen earlier TV footage of the same pair, in the same hospital, leering, making obscene gestures and drunkenly querying whether the cameramen had heard of Richard the Lionheart. Sadly this clip, along with footage of the fighting, confirmed in the minds of most Turks that the “English hooligans” had drunkenly provoked a fight in which they had come off worse.

    Even so, the media coverage was generally less partisan than in Britain. A couple of the better TV stations ran long discussion programmes analysing the newly discovered phenomenon of Turkish hooliganism. Most of the papers were solid in their condemnation of the violence and respectful of the two who died. Some even edged their reports on the funerals in black.

    But others took a deeply unpleasant tone with the mass circulation Star making a truly sick bilingual pun on the number two – two goals, two dead. Two weeks later the smaller Gunes was little better, heralding the departure of the Galatasaray team to Leeds with “It’s as if they’re going to war”. But neither the Turkish press nor the frankly fantastical accounts in Britain go very far to shedding any real light on the night’s events.

    Witnesses described a depressingly familiar scenario. About 9.30 – roughly half an hour before the killings – one group of drunk Leeds fans started jostling people on the south side of Taksim Square, and were confronted by a smaller group of unarmed Turks. One witness claims that in the next five minutes she saw other groups of Leeds fans running towards the square, in her words, “as if they knew what was happening and wanted to join in”. With the arrival of a group of armed Galatasaray fans, ineffectual brawling turned into a vicious and ultimately fatal fight.

    But why? Was there an incident with a Turkish flag as was claimed? Personally I doubt it. That story only surfaced after the police had taken statements from those arrested, who had an obvious interest in suggesting mitigating factors for their behaviour. The big question, posed by one of the bar owners, is why the police, always a heavy presence in the square, took so long to act. They aren’t normally noted for reticence in cracking heads.

    Two Leeds fans I spoke to claimed the stabbings occurred after the police moved in, but also confirmed that the fight involved around 150 Leeds fans against about 40 Turks, a fact the British press chose to ignore.

    The whole miserable episode raises so many more questions than answers. I don’t understand why flags are so sacred their (alleged) desecration can incite the murder of innocent men, or why a statue of a dead footballer should attain something of the status of a religious shrine.

    Can it be that football is filling the void left by the demise of the nation state or of conventional religion? Do fans see themselves as conquering heroes, or defenders of the one true faith? Is that where Richard comes in? I hope not.

    From WSC 160 June 2000. What was happening this month

    via When Saturday Comes – The Half Decent Football Magazine – War of words.

  • Killers rearrested over Leeds fan deaths in Turkey

    Killers rearrested over Leeds fan deaths in Turkey

    The 10th anniversary of the men's deaths was marked at Elland Road in April
    The 10th anniversary of the men's deaths was marked at Elland Road in April

    The brother of one of two Leeds United fans murdered in Turkey 10 years ago has welcomed news that two of the killers have been rearrested.

    Chris Loftus and Kevin Speight were stabbed in Istanbul on the eve of Leeds’ Uefa Cup semi-final tie against Galatasaray in April 2000.

    Two of the men convicted of murder have been rearrested after losing an appeal against conviction.

    Mr Loftus’s brother Andy said: “It’s a step in the right direction.”

    Mr Speight and Mr Loftus were attacked with machetes when a row broke out between rival fans.

    Those involved were jailed but after several months were released on bail pending an appeal.

    Earlier this year an appeals court in Turkey upheld their convictions.

    Andy Loftus said there was still anger over the length of time the case had taken.

    “Obviously we want to see someone behind bars for this but it’s just baffling it’s taken ten years to get to this point.”

    Leeds MP Fabian Hamilton, who has been campaigning on behalf of the dead men’s families, has also welcomed the news.

    He said the actions of the Turkish court were “very significant” because the men had been free on bail and that had “caused a great deal of anxiety for the families”.

    via BBC News – Killers rearrested over Leeds fan deaths in Turkey.

  • Jak Codd in act of censorship

    Jak Codd in act of censorship

    UK, May 3, (Pal Telegraph) Comments made in a published interview with Sameh Akram Habeeb have resulted in Jak Codd removing an issue of the Leeds Student newspaper from campus and locking it in his office.

    Sameh Habeeb stated, in his interview, that he felt there was a pro-Israel bias in the Western media and that you “only have to look at who controls the media”. Codd stated that this was anti-semitic and could not be allowed on campus as it presented a risk to students.

    As far as issues of welfare/reputation are concerned it appears clear that Codd does not agree with a free press. The comments were stated within a feature and as a clearly attributed interview, but Codd seems to be under the impression that students cannot interpret viewpoints and judge them for themselves.

    When challenged by a Jewish sub-editor of the paper who disagreed with his actions, Codd shouted “you’re only one person” to which the challenger retorted “you’re only one person”. It is claimed Codd then acted to get the sub-editor removed from the building by security.

    Codd has censored the press (irony?).
    Codd has ignored the hundreds of hours of hard work that go into making a newspaper.
    Codd has acted beyond his authority.
    Codd has brought shame on Leeds.

    The Palestine Telegraph

  • Leeds student paper pulled for antisemitic interview

    Leeds student paper pulled for antisemitic interview

    Leeds University’s newspaper Leeds Student has been pulled from shelves by the Students’ Union after it published an antisemitic comment by Palestinian Telegraph owner Sameh Habeeb.

    Sameh Habeeb

    The interviewer asked Mr Habeeb: “Do you believe mainstream media organizations have a hidden agenda?”

    He replied: “They are certainly pro-Israeli. I think you have to ask yourself who controls the media.”

    A Facebook group protesting against the decision by Leeds Students’ Union to censor the issue has over 700 members, many of whom allude to the fact that one of the Students’ Union officers who took the decision to censor the newspaper, Jak Codd, is Jewish.

    One student wrote on the group: “Ok, so one of your student officers took offence at an article because he views an interview answer as saying the media is controlled by Jewish people. A Jewish student officer who then exerts control over the student newspaper by getting the paper removed and the article censored.”

    Mr Habeeb’s website has recently posted a video of the former Ku Klux Klan leader David Duke talking about Israel’s “terrorism” against America, and the allegations of organ theft against IDF troops in Haiti.

    Its patrons are journalist Lauren Booth and Respect leader George Galloway. Liberal Democrat peer Jenny Tonge resigned as a patron after the website published David Duke’s video.

    The Jewish Chronicle Online

  • Students unite in campaign for better bus service

    Students unite in campaign for better bus service

    Student Unions for three colleges join in public transport appeal

    leeds buses

    Students from three major higher education establishments in Leeds are joining together for a major campaign to fight for better public transport.

    Student Unions for the University of Leeds, Leeds Metropolitan Universityand Leeds Trinity University College in Horsforth are uniting under the banner of Leeds Student Bus Service Campaign in a bid to improve bus reliability, increased frequency of buses and fairer pricing.

    Between them, the unions represent almost 100,000 students in Leeds. Protest plans are only at an early stage, but student bodies could unite to boycott buses by organising walking and cycling events.

    A website – www.leedsstudentbuscampaign.com – has been launched where students can complain about late buses and sign a petition calling for improvements. The campaign also has a page on Facebook.

    Hannah Greenslade, community officer at Leeds University Union, said:

    “We put a lot of money into the buses in Leeds, it would be quite effective if we were to withdraw that custom in some way.

    “We’re hoping to get support from outside the student body as well – we’re aware that there is a lot of feeling among local residents about the frequency and reliability of services.

    “Too often buses are late or simply don’t show up at all. It would be better if services ran on a regular basis like every 10 minutes or so, instead of giving specific times

    “The 97 bus, for example, is the only bus that stops at Leeds Trinity and other parts of the local community – yet at peak times, there is one bus every 20 minutes, which is often full.”

    Greenslade is also calling for fairer pricing for all Leeds students.

    She added: “The Green Zone buss pass scheme does little to help students as those that travel by bus most often are those that live outside it. Termly and monthly passes are expensive and do not allow students to receive discounts if just making occasional journeys.

    “We are calling for a universal student discount which applies to all university and college students throughout the year.”

    Greenslade said she’d recently had a meeting with bus operators First Group which runs the majority of buses in Leeds, which she claimed had seen the company fail to move on any of the issues.

    A spokesman for First said:

    “First provides a high-quality, dedicated, bus service for students in Leeds, especially in terms of cost and frequency.

    “Cost – we have a number of specially discounted tickets for students to use on our services to ensure they get good value for money.

    “Frequency – Many of our routes used by students have dedicated 10 minute frequencies allowing students quick and easy access into the city.

    “We will listen to the concerns of the students unions, as we have done so in the past, and will try and work out ways we can address some of these concerns.”

    Metro, which works on behalf of West Yorkshire bus and rail passengers, said today that the work it is doing to develop a Quality Contract schemefor West Yorkshire’s buses would address the issues being raised by the Leeds students.

    By bringing bus services under a London-style franchising system where operators bid for the right to run services, Metro says it would be able to set standards in terms of fares, frequency and reliability of services. This arrangement would also end the current confusion over different operators’ tickets by enabling Metro to introduce a flexible ticketing system which could be used on all the county’s bus and train services.

    What do you think? Are buses unreliable and overpriced? Have your say in the comments section below.

    The Guardian