Tag: KCK

  • English PEN “welcomes” Turkish Minister of Culture

    English PEN “welcomes” Turkish Minister of Culture

    Posted on April 14, 2013 by heissenstat

    In an open letter to Turkish Minister of Culture and Tourism, Ömer Çelik, English PENwelcomes him to the 2013 London Book Fair, at which Turkey will be a “market focus.”  PEN notes with regret, however, that this celebration of Turkish literary vigor comes at a time when major authors and intellectuals are subject to imprisonment and government harassment because of the ideas they express.

    Busra Ersanli, a respected scholar currently on trial on terrorism charges

    Busra Ersanli, a respected scholar currently on trial on terrorism charges

    PEN welcomes positive changes within Fourth Judicial Package, but notes that they do not go far enough in addressing basic attacks on freedom of expression:

    As a charity that promotes literature and defends the right to freedom of expression, we regret, however, the continuing challenges faced by writers, editors and journalists in Turkey.  According to the PEN International Writers in Prison Committee’s most recent case list (July-December 2012) there are currently more cases of concern to PEN in Turkey than in any other country in the world. While we are pleased to note that the 4thJudicial Reform package has gone some way to addressing some of the limitations to free speech in Turkey, we are concerned that existing laws, and their interpretation, still curtail the ability to exercise a fundamental human right.

    PEN also highlights on-going cases against Fazıl Say, Büşra Ersanlı, and Ahmet Şık as well as the on-going detention of Zeynep Kuray.

    zeynepkuray-2

    The PEN letter concludes:

    We firmly believe that the charges against these writers are in violation of their rights to non-violent freedom of expression and association, principles to which the Turkish government is committed as a signatory to the UN International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and the European Convention on Human Rights. We therefore respectfully call on the authorities to drop all charges against Say, Ersanlı and Şık, and to release Kuray and the many others currently detained.

  • POLITICS – Istanbul intel chief reassigned

    POLITICS – Istanbul intel chief reassigned

    n 14455 4The Istanbul chief of Turkey’s National Intelligence Organization (MİT) has been removed from his post and recalled back to Ankara, daily Hürriyet reported today.

    The decision was announced to have been made in accordance with a decision made in January and was related to the country’s ongoing match–fixing probe, sources said.

    The head of the MİT’s Istanbul branch, İ.N., who was identified only by his initials, is set to pass on his duties in two days to A.D., another MIT official identified only by his initials.

    A.D. is currently serving in Ankara and has taken on significant responsibilities within the organization, according to reports.

    MİT’s Istanbul Regional Presidency is among the most important branches of the organization, having played a critical role in obtaining intelligence prior to acts of terrorism, operations against the Kurdistan Communities Union (KCK) and many other counter–intelligence operations.

    via POLITICS – Istanbul intel chief reassigned.

  • Council of Europe Criticizes Turkey’s Judiciary

    Council of Europe Criticizes Turkey’s Judiciary

    AP120113120972 Turkey Kurds 24JAN12The criticism comes as two of the main opposition parties claim the government is using the judiciary to silence opposition in the country.

    In a detailed report, the Council of Europe’s commissioner on human rights, Thomas Hammerberg, has raised serious concerns that Turkey’s judiciary is threatening fundamental human rights.

    “There are real problems in the way the system of justice function, including the judicial system, and that has an impact on human rights,” said Hammerberg. “[That’s] obvious, you don’t have justice in all cases being brought into the system.”

    One of the main concerns raised in the report is the growing number of arrests of political party members. The ongoing investigation into the Kurdistan Communities Union (KCK) is cited as a particular concern. Turkish authorities believe the KCK is the political wing of the Kurdish rebel group, the Kurdistan Workers’ Party, or PKK.

    According to local human-rights groups, more than 4,000 people have been detained since 2009, most of them members of the country’s pro-Kurdish Peace and Democracy Party (BDP). BDP parliament member Ertugral Kurkcu says the detentions have little to do with fighting terrorism and more to do with undermining the political party.

    “These people are kidnapped. They have no guilt. Many of them elected people,” said Kurkcu. “Many of them trade union leaders. All influential politicians, middle men in Kurdish politics. They have no relation with violence. They have not even been accused of being affiliated with any kind of violent action.”

    Hammerberg echoed such concerns, saying he believes in many cases there appeared to be little evidence to justify the detentions. Many of those detained in the probe have been held for years without trial. The Council of Europe report also raised pretrial detention as an area of serious concern.

    Hammerberg claims his interviews with members of the judiciary suggest pretrial detention is being used as a punishment.

    “I was discussing with a prosecutor in Diyarbakir and spelling out there should be reasons to detain someone before the final trial, and he said at least they will learn a lesson. But why does the penitentiary system take on, teach lessons to people who perhaps may be innocent?” Asked Hammerberg. “There have been cases up to 10 years. That [is] absolutely outrageous. No one should be held before [being] proven guilty for such long periods.”

    Supporters of the main opposition Republican People’s Party (CHP) march with posters of their leader Kemal Kilicdaroglu during a protest against the government in central Istanbul, January 10, 2012

    Reuters

    Supporters of the main opposition Republican People’s Party (CHP) march with posters of their leader Kemal Kilicdaroglu during a protest against the government in central Istanbul, January 10, 2012

    The leader of the main opposition People’s Republican Party, or CHP, Kemal Kilicdaroglu, strongly attacked pretrial detention earlier this month, and claimed that Turkey is becoming “an open prison.” Two of his parliamentary deputies have been held in jail for more than three years, as part an investigation into an alleged plot to overthrow the government.

    The European Court of Human Rights has repeatedly ruled against Turkey on the issue of pretrial detention. Facing mounting criticism, Justice Minister Sadullah Ergin announced a package of reforms that include addressing pre-trial detention.

    He said decisions pertaining to arrest, or the refusal of a request for release on bail, will now have to be clearly written out. He said the courts will have to justify with concrete facts any strong suspicion that a defendant will commit a crime. He said they will have to make clear the purpose behind a detention and ensure that it is reasonable.

    Riza Turmen, a deputy for the main opposition and a former judge for the European Court of Human Rights, says the reforms are cosmetic, and that the reform does not apply to anyone held in connection with anti-terror laws. He adds that controversial portions of those laws have resulted in the detention of nearly 100 journalists – another area of concern raised by the Council of Europe report.

    But Turmen argues a more fundamental threat is facing Turkey. “The problem today in Turkey [is], there is enormous concentration of power in the hands of one party,” he said. “The government controls the judiciary. The government controls all the independent institutions. Turkey has never seen such a big concentration of power, and such a concentration of power is detrimental to any democracy.”

    In his report, Hammerberg expresses concern about the government’s influence on Turkey’s judiciary. He acknowledges that Turkey faces a serious problem of terrorism and says the government’s commitment to reform appears to be genuine, but now is the time for action.

    “We are still waiting for implementation of signals we have received from the government,” said Hammerberg. “It’s a question of real implementation, not only talks and statements, when it comes to reforms and genuine changes.”

    In the early years of its decade-long rule, the AK Party won praise in combating torture and ending extra-judicial killings. But observers warn that good will is fast running out with the main opposition parties, along with a growing body of evidence – of which the Council of Europe report is the latest – that raises concerns about increasing authoritarian tendencies.

    via Council of Europe Criticizes Turkey’s Judiciary | Europe | English.

  • Is the KCK a party, an organization or an alternative state structure?

    Is the KCK a party, an organization or an alternative state structure?

    In recent times, Turkey has begun to hear about the Kurdish Communities Union (KCK) more and more frequently.

    pkk

    The structure that these three letters describe, however, is not sufficiently understood. The KCK has been placed in the same basket as the terrorist Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK), due to its relations with the terrorist group. But the two are actually different. “Koma Ciwaken Kürdistan,” the KCK, is not, in fact, as the press says, “the urban extension of the PKK.” On the contrary, the PKK is just a piece of the overarching KCK, a fragment of the whole.

    Turkey first began to hear about the KCK when the April 14, 2009 operation took place. On the orders of the Diyarbakır public prosecutor, a few people were arrested. At later dates, the operations continued. A list of allegations prepared by the prosecutor regarding the KCK was accepted by Diyarbakır’s 6th Criminal Court on June 18, 2010. The 7,578-page list of allegations explains the general structure of the KCK, as has been revealed from documents obtained by authorities.

    The essence of what these documents reveal about the KCK is thus: The so-called legislative parliament of the Kongra-Gel terrorist organization on May 17, 2005 formed the “shadow state” of the KCK. Kongra-Gel then accepted the KCK contract as its constitution, and let the public know that it had done so. The new structure, with its own legislative, executive and judicial organs, was defined as a “confederate system.” The KCK possesses both a lateral and a pyramid organizational structure, and is active not only in Turkey but also in Syria, Iran and Iraq.

    By forming an alternative to the official organs of justice, management and politics in these countries, it provides a roof under which its supporters can gather.

    Abdullah Öcalan is the leader at the helm of the KCK, while the so-called legislative organ, Kongra-Gel, is headed up by Zübeyir Aydar, and Murat Karayılan leads the so-called “executive council.” Karayılan’s assistants are Duran Kalkan, Mustafa Karasu and Cemil Bayık. The armed terrorist units known as the “people’s defense powers” are autonomous organizations within the KCK. As for the PKK, in the KCK’s “constitution” it is defined as the “ideological power behind the KCK system,” responsible for bringing into practice its philosophy of leadership and its ideology. The top-ranked leaders of the terrorist PKK also comprise the KCK’s leadership cadre.

    The KCK bestows and revokes citizenship, imposes tax obligations, tries people in courts, engages in armed battle, has both local and central units, makes an effort to control regional leadership and in every way puts Öcalan forward as the leader of Kurdish society, irrespective of the desires of the people. The KCK –which has spread out to cities, towns, neighborhoods, streets, village organizations, communes and homes — uses a flag with a red star on a yellow sun with 21 rays on a green base. Its justice system includes an executive high court, a people’s free court, and a high electoral board. Crimes that occur in its military arena are addressed by its High Military Court.

    The founder and leader of the KCK is PKK leader Öcalan. According to the KCK’s “constitution,” Öcalan is the philosophical, theoretical and strategic doctrinarian of a democracy based on ecological awareness and equality of the sexes. He represents the people in every arena, and is the foundation of the leadership. He oversees basic policy-making, and gives final decisions on basic matters. He inspects decisions from Kongra-Gel to make sure they are in keeping with the revolutionary profile. He appoints the president of the executive council. All Kurds, no matter what country they live in, must acknowledge fealty to Öcalan.

    The goals of this structure are defined as such: “To create a society in Kurdistan based on the principles of radical democracy, that lives according to the essential elements of democratic societal co-federalism, and which is organized democratically, based on equality of the sexes and ecological awareness. To fight against every kind of backwardness in Kurdish society, and to both create and advance individual and societal spiritual and financial development. To see that every faction of society is able to create its own democratic organization, to create regional people’s parliaments based on the policy of ‘equal KCK citizens.’ To bring about a transition from an economy based on profit to a communal economy based on user value and sharing. To fight against any attacks on the leadership of the Democratic Confederation [Öcalan].”

    According to the KCK contract, those attached to the KCK system are defined as “citizens” or “countrymen.” People who betray the principles or aims of the KCK can have their citizenship revoked by decision of the “people’s courts.” Every person living in areas under the rule of the KCK is obligated to actively participate in defense actions when there is a state of war. Every KCK citizen is also obliged to pay taxes.

    The highest court in the KCK is Kongra-Gel (the Kurdish People’s Parliament). The highest executive organ is the one run by Karayılan from the Kandil Mountains in northern Iraq. This organ coordinates all of the various institutions, units and organizations of the KCK in Turkey, Syria, Iran and Iraq. This unit is responsible for implementing all of the decisions made by the highest leader. It is obliged to submit regular reports about its actions to said leadership. As for Öcalan, he occupies a position which is literally not to be questioned within this structure.

    The Turkish section of the KCK is referred to as the “Turkey Parliament.” The organizational scheme for this section is led by one Sabri Ok, known by the codename “Amed.” This structure plans and carries out all of the various activities in provincial capitals. This runs the gamut from mass events such as throwing Molotov cocktails, burning tires and throwing stones to press conferences, rallies, concerts, festivals, marches and sit-ins. Since 2007, it has increased its involvement in civil disobedience events as well. A campaign to gather signatures in support of the statement “I accept Abdullah Öcalan as the representative of my political will,” a mass march which headed for Mudanya under the name “A March towards İmralı,” the “A Democratic and Peaceful Solution to the Kurdish Problem” rally, hunger strikes in protest of cell conditions imposed on Abdullah Öcalan, the violence and “Edi Bese” events that began in March of 2006 in Diyarbakır and spread quickly to other regions; these all followed on one another. There were street protests that occurred all over Turkey, starting in the East and the Southeast.

    Following the 1999 capture of Öcalan, the PKK developed a new dialogue. It began trying to spread a Palestinian-style “intifada” movement, known as “Serhildan,” which means “uprising.” Within the framework of civil disobedience, it followed a strategy of increasing tension by bringing security forces face-to-face with the people. More weight was placed on city structures, with the aim to create a paramilitary organization strengthened in its capacity to carry out normal daily obligations in city neighborhoods, to provide all sorts of financial and spiritual help, and to act according to the wishes of the organization. This is a critical matter that calls for sensitive and careful thought. Some experts note that the urban organization’s power has now surpassed that of the organization in the mountains. Diyarbakır Sunday’s Zaman