Tag: Joe Biden

  • Biden Asks Turkey to Join in New Sanctions Against Iran

    Biden Asks Turkey to Join in New Sanctions Against Iran

    By MARC CHAMPION in Istanbul and CAROL E. LEE in Ankara

    Vice President Joe Biden called on Turkey to join new sanctions against Iran, testing the limits of a U.S.-Turkish alliance that has improved dramatically as fallout from the Arab Spring drives Ankara into growing competition with Tehran.

    Arriving in Ankara from Iraq, Mr. Biden also thanked Turkey for what he described as its “real leadership” in applying pressure to Syria, just days after Ankara announced its own sanctions on the regime and called for Syrian President Bashar al-Assad to step down.

    WO AI010 BIDEN G 20111202174504

    The vice president began his two-day visit at a time when Turkey has fallen in step with core U.S. foreign policies in the region—specifically toward Syria and Iran—and has become one of Washington’s most active foreign-policy allies, despite continued differences over Israel.

    That is in stark contrast to last year, when Washington was gripped by debate over whether Turkey, a key North Atlantic Treaty Organization member, was turning east, away from its U.S. and European allies. Turkey triggered particular anger by voting in June 2010 against U.S.-backed sanctions on Iran at the United Nations Security Council.

    In a question-and-answer interview published Friday in one of Turkey’s main daily newspapers, Hurriyet, Mr. Biden invited Turkey to join another round of sanctions aimed at Tehran’s nuclear program.

    “Putting pressure on Iran’s leadership is necessary to secure a negotiated settlement, and that is why we encourage our partners, including Turkey, to take steps to impose new sanctions on Iran, as we have continued to do,” Mr. Biden told the newspaper.

    There is little sign that Turkey is ready to join the U.S. and allies such as the U.K. in applying potentially crippling sanctions.

    After meeting with Turkey’s President Abdullah Gul in Ankara on Friday, Mr. Biden flew to Istanbul. He was due to meet Saturday with Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, who is recovering from an operation.

    A senior U.S. administration official said the issue of Iranian sanctions didn’t come up in Mr. Biden’s two-hour meeting with President Gul. Neither did the two men discuss the possibility, floated by France, of creating an internationally protected buffer zone inside Syria along its border with Turkey.

    Mr. Biden told Mr. Gul he believes Iran’s influence is declining across the region because of its nuclear ambitions, as well as other recent perceived missteps, such as Tuesday’s assault on the British Embassy in Tehran.

    Analysts say Turkey’s increased cooperation with Washington is in large part due to fallout from the Arab Spring that continues to roil the Middle East and has pushed Ankara into increasingly open competition with Tehran.

    Turkey and Iran have chosen opposite sides in Syria as the country has descended into violence, with Tehran continuing to back the Assad regime and Turkey, the opposition. At the same time, a tacit competition for markets and influence in common neighbor Iraq also threatens to become more acute as U.S. troops leave.

    Related Video

    • Funerals, Protests in Syria (12/01/2011)
    • U.K. Orders Iranian Embassy Closed (11/30/2011)
    • U.S. Places New Sanctions on Iran (11/21/2011)
    • What Are U.S. Options on Iran? (11/10/2011)

    “In a month’s time, the U.S. will leave Iraq. To have three of your neighbors as either Iran, or [in the case of Iraq and Syria] supported by Iran, should not be comforting for Turkey,” said Soli Ozel, professor of international relations and political science at Bilgi University, in Istanbul.

    The U.S. administration official said Mr. Biden had said in his meeting with President Gul that he didn’t believe Iraq would fall under Iranian control once U.S. troops leave.

    Iran was particularly angered—and the U.S. gratified—by Ankara’s decision in September to agree to host a radar for NATO’s anti-missile defense system, which is directed primarily at Iran. On Saturday, a general in Iran’s Revolutionary Guard, Amir Ali Hajizadeh, warned that should any military strike be made on Iran, Tehran would target Turkey’s NATO radar.

    Turkey this week also appeared to choose sides in Iran’s dispute with Britain, condemning Tuesday’s semiofficial sacking of the British Embassy in Tehran by hard-line students.

    But Turkey is wary of escalating actions against Tehran. It shares a long border with Iran and is potentially exposed to a revival of support, from Tehran and Damascus, for Kurdish rebels battling Turkish troops.

    Ankara also doesn’t want to fuel a Shiite-Sunni confrontation on its borders. Iran and Iraq are majority Shiite, while Turkey is mainly Sunni. Syria, meanwhile, is governed by a minority elite of Alawites, a Shiite sect.

    “There are limits to what Turkey can do,” said Mr. Ozel. “You still get 20% of gas from Iran, you still ship your goods to Central Asia through Iran and there are still about 1 million Iranian tourists coming over the border.”

    The storming of the British embassy appears to have been triggered by Britain’s decision to ban U.K.-based banks from doing business with Iran’s central bank, creating potential difficulties for Tehran in financing energy exports. On Thursday, the U.S. Senate voted in favor of a ban that would penalize foreign banks operating in the U.S. that do business with Iran’s central bank.

    Corrections & Amplifications
    On Thursday, the U.S. Senate voted in favor of a ban involving foreign banks that do business with Iran’s central bank. An earlier version of the story said it was Tuesday.

    Write to Marc Champion at [email protected] and Carol E. Lee at [email protected]

  • Some Chicago Jews say Obama is actually the ‘first Jewish president’

    Some Chicago Jews say Obama is actually the ‘first Jewish president’

    Last update – 05:10 13/11/2008

    By Natasha Mozgovaya

    Tags: Israel, Barack Obama

    Quite a few of Barack Obama’s “friends from the past” have popped up recently. It’s doubtful whether he even knows their names, but in the Chicago Jewish community many people really are long-time friends of the president-elect. Some of the older people in the community say that they “raised him,” while others half-jokingly call Obama “the first Jewish president.”

    They raised contributions for him, provided him with contacts, and also enjoyed hosting him and believed in his glorious future in politics. During most of the campaign, when rumors were spreading among American Jews that Obama was a closet Muslim who was more supportive of the Palestinians and was interested in granting the president of Iran legitimacy, his support among American Jews did not even come close to that enjoyed by Bill Clinton. But at the moment of truth, according to the exit polls, it turns out that 78 percent of Jews voted for Obama.

    Members of the Chicago Jewish community are not surprised. They claim that the Jews simply discovered what they have known for years. Obama lives near the synagogue in the Hyde Park neighborhood of Chicago, an area with quite a large Jewish population. Some of area visitors may even mistake the heavy security presence on the street for the synagogue’s location – that is, until they hear about Obama.

    Alan Solow, an attorney from Chicago, a leader of the Jewish community and a veteran Obama supporter, was one of the few who gained access to the president-elect after his speech in Chicago’s Grant Park last week. “After his speech on Tuesday night [election day] in front of hundreds of thousands people, he was the same Barack Obama I know. I think his life is going to change, but it won’t change the type of person he is. Presidents tend to become isolated, but I’m confident he’ll fight hard against it,” he says.

    Solow used to live in Obama’s neighborhood, and says that Obama has always had “excellent relations with the Jewish community.”

    “As a local senator, he was very effective and helpful in what we call ‘the Jewish agenda,’ the community issues, values. He has always had a deep understanding of Israel’s need for security. I went with him to Israel for a week in January 2006, and when he started the race for the presidency I had no doubt I’d support him. The first thing that impressed me about him was his intellect – he’s one of the smartest people I’ve met – but he’s also a warm and caring person who has a keen interest in issues that people of this country are worried about,” continues Solow.

    “I said with a smile that he will be the first Jewish president. He also has a deep understanding of issues that confront Israel and the Jewish community. And I think his personal story reflects the story of Jewish immigration to the United States.

    “He was raised in a family without any built-in advantages: His father was a stranger, but with the help of a close family and an emphasis on education and hard work, he succeeded. It’s the Jewish story in America. He understands it, and that’s why he’s so close to the Jewish community. His first autobiography is about seeking his roots and he understands Jewish people’s yearning for this – it fits into his world view and it’s one of the reasons for his support of Israel. When he says that Israel’s security is sacrosanct, I believe him. As I know him, he won’t say things he doesn’t really mean. And he has a lot of close Jewish friends who can confirm this.”

    Solow is also very familiar with Obama’s first appointment – his designated White House chief of staff. “Rahm is an active member of Jewish community, his children go to the day schools and he was always recognized as Jewish when he was Clinton’s advisor. But I don’t believe that the fact that he’s a devoted Jew and supports Israel has anything to do with his appointment. He’s simply the best person for this job, because of his experience in Congress and in Clinton’s administration, and because of his intellect. But his support of Israel fits with the president-elect’s thinking.”

    Michael Bauer, a political activist from the community who has known Obama for over a decade and supported his presidential campaign, says his first reaction to Obama’s victory was disbelief. “It seemed like a dream. After the election, I had a brief opportunity to congratulate him, to exchange a hug with Barack, a kiss with Michelle. We’re very proud of him and we’re sure he’ll successfully handle the big challenges facing the country and the new president,” he says.

    “If we go back to his work as a State senator, his Senate district had a relatively high percentage of Jews, and more importantly, it was a Jewish population involved both politically and with charity organizations. When he was in the State Senate, the Democrats were a minority. When you’re a minority you don’t get too much accomplished. Neither Barack as a State Senator nor any of his colleagues were able to accomplish a great deal, because of Republican control of the State Senate. However, because of his district, it was always clear to me that many people supporting Barack are active in the Jewish community both locally and nationally. And they agreed about his sensitivity to a number of issues – the issue of the U.S-Israel relationship and domestically, issues that many of us are concerned about, be it the separation of Church and State, women’s right to choose, etc. It was always a natural fit between the Jewish community and Barack Obama. He understands those issues. Frankly, he’s so smart he understands them better than most of us,” says Bauer.

    Identifying with Sderot

    “As a U.S. senator he visited Israel twice, and especially the second time I think was highly significant,” Bauer continues. “I think it was important to him personally to go to Sderot and see the proximity involved when Israel is attacked on a daily basis from Gaza. I think it was also symbolic for the people of Israel and the worldwide community, as well as the Jewish community, to see Barack Obama going to Sderot and speaking about it, that as president it will be unacceptable to him and he recognizes Israel’s right to defend itself. This symbolism was important on so many different levels. I’ve known the president-elect for over 10 years, and his values and principles never change. If you ask me whether I have confidence that he’ll continue to be committed to Israel’s existence as a Jewish state within secure borders – I have absolutely no doubt.”

    “President Bush supported Israel as well, but after eight years of his support Israel faces a stronger Iran, Hezbollah at the northern border, Hamas at the southern border – and Hamas gained a sort of political legitimacy. I think George Bush was a disaster for the State of Israel. And I think Obama’s administration understands Israel’s needs for safety and security, the importance of Israel remaining a Jewish state, and will try to help to mediate a peace in the Middle East that accomplishes those goals. There are still people who don’t believe it, but the great thing in democracy is that everyone has an opinion and you don’t need 100 percent consensus. I think peace in the Middle East is one of his highest priorities – he’s not going to wait for seven years as a president to start working on it.”

    Bauer was also heavily involved in Rahm Emanuel’s campaign for Congress. “Let me say something about Rahm. One of the things people don’t like about him is the fact he’s short with people, but it’s only because he’s such a smart person. He doesn’t need a 15-minute phone conversation, he gets to the issues in three minutes. And Israel – it’s in his blood. The fact that Joe Biden, with a long record of supporting Israel, is Obama’s vice president-elect and Rahm Emanuel is his chief of staff – I’m not sure what reassurance anyone needs that the president-elect when he is president will remain a close ally of the State of Israel and the people of Israel.”

    Source: www.haaretz.com, 13.11.2008

  • U.S. Ambassadorial nominee for Turkey doesn’t dispute Morgenthau’s record on Armenian Genocide

    U.S. Ambassadorial nominee for Turkey doesn’t dispute Morgenthau’s record on Armenian Genocide

    /PanARMENIAN.Net/ Ambassador to Turkey designate James Jeffrey, in response to questions from Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman and Vice-Presidential candidate Joe Biden (D-DE), affirmed that official U.S. diplomatic reports by Ambassadors Morgenthau and Elkus and other Armenian Genocide-era U.S. diplomats in the Ottoman Empire did, in fact, describe the attempted extermination of the Armenian population, the Armenian National Committee of America (ANCA) told PanARMENIAN.Net.

    “Although falling far short of a clear and proper recognition of the Armenian Genocide, Ambassador Jeffrey, in his response to Senator Biden’s questioning, moved U.S. policy in the right direction by publicly agreeing – after long years of official disregard, disrespect, and dismissal of Ambassador Henry Morgenthau’s proud legacy – that our nation’s diplomatic representatives to the Ottoman Empire did, in fact, document the Ottoman government’s clear intent and systematic campaign to destroy its Armenian population,” said ANCA Executive Director Aram Hamparian. “We want to thank Chairman Biden for his thoughtful inquiries that led to this reaffirmation of the American record, and to, once again, express our appreciation to Senators Menendez and Kerry for their incisive lines of questioning during the Foreign Relations Committee’s confirmation hearing earlier this week.”

    In questions submitted to the Amb. Jeffrey, Sen. Biden asked: “Do you dispute that U.S. diplomats serving in the Ottoman Empire during the Armenian Genocide documented a systematic, government-sponsored campaign ‘with intent to destroy, in whole or in part’ the Armenian population?”

    Ambassador-Designate Jeffrey provided the following response: No. I have read many of the historical records from 1915-1916 related to U.S. diplomatic reporting on these events in Turkey, and I do not dispute that Ambassador Morgenthau, Ambassador Elkus, and other diplomats during that time period reported on what they described as an attempt to exterminate the Armenian population.

    Source: www.panarmenian.net, 27.09.2008

  • “Joe Biden: A Realist Cold War  Liberal”

    “Joe Biden: A Realist Cold War Liberal”

    New from SETA Foundation for Political, Economic and Social Research:
    Policy Brief No. 21, September 2008


    Joe Biden: A Realist Cold War Liberal”

    by Nuh YILMAZ,
    George Mason University , Washington D.C.

     

     

    Joe Biden was selected as Barack Obama’s vice presidential candidate largely because of his expertise in foreign policy. Traditionally, in U.S. politics, Dick Cheney-like strong vice presidents are exception, not the rule. It is wiser to focus on Obama’s foreign policy outlook rather than Biden’s, which would benefit Turkey in the long run with its realistic tendencies. Biden’s voting pattern, as it is displayed in three different issues (Cyprus-Armenian Issue-Iraq) does not seem friendly to the Turkish position. However, Biden as a statesman would not create extra problems for Turkey at the expense of U.S national interests. In all of these issues, the person that should be watched carefully is Obama, not Biden. Spending more energy to analyze Obama’s geopolitical priorities can benefit Turkey in the long run.

    Please find attached a copy of SETA Policy Brief No. 21, “Joe Biden: A Realist Cold War Liberal”

    Please click on the following link to download the document:



    SETA FOUNDATION FOR POLITICAL, ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL RESEARCH
    Resit Galip Caddesi Hereke Sokak No: 10 GOP, Cankaya 06700 Anka ra , Turkey
    Tel: +90 312 405 61 51   Fax: +90 312 405 69 03
    www.setav.org
    [email protected]