Tag: Iran’s nuclear program

Iran Nuclear threat

  • Turkey Denies Talking with Israel About Iran Strike

    Turkey Denies Talking with Israel About Iran Strike

    Turkey dismisses report suggesting that an Israeli delegation would hold talks about using a Turkish airbase to train for a attack in Iran.

     By Elad Benari
    img355436
    F-15 Fighter Jet
    Flash 90

    Turkey dismissed on Sunday evening a news report suggesting that an Israeli delegation set to arrive in Ankara on Monday would hold talksabout Israel using a Turkish airbaseto train for a possible attack on Iranian nuclear facilities.

    The report, which appeared in theSunday Times, said that NationalSecurity Council chairman Yaakov Amidror would offer missiles and advanced technology to Turkey in exchange for Ankara’s allowing the Israeli Air Force to use a base located approximately  1,000 miles from the border with Iran.

    However, a Turkish official denied the report, telling the Turkish daily Hurriyet, “The report seems to have explained a hypothesis.”

    “We have already said that the normalization of our relations will be step by step. Talking about the prospects of a military cooperation at this stage would be irrelevant. We are not there yet. We haven’t even yet appointed a new ambassador to Israel,” said the official, speaking on condition of anonymity.

    Amidror will head an Israeli delegation to Ankara that will begin discussions over compensation to families of those who died in clashes during the 2010 Mavi Marmara incident.

    The Sunday Times report alleged that in addition to the Marmara talks, Amidror was also assigned to try to resuscitate a 1996 agreement between Jerusalem and Ankara which allowed the Israeli Air Forces to train in Turkish airspace and use the Akıncı airbase.

    Turkey recently delayed the beginning of talks with Israel over compensation for the Marmara flotilla.

    The talks were delayed until Monday because Turkey’s Deputy Prime Minister Bulent Arinc had to accompany Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan on a trip to Kazakhstan on the originally scheduled date.

    Arinc, who will lead the negotiating on behalf of Turkey, told the Hebrew-languageNRG news site last week that “Turkey anticipates full restoration of relations with Israel. I will lead the Turkish delegation for negotiations with Israel next week on restitution for the nine Mavi Marmara victims.”

    Tags: Turkey ,Mavi Marmara ,Iran Strike ,Iran Nuclear threat ,Turkey-Israel relations
  • Turkey Facilitates Talks with Iran, Following Bickering over Venues

    Turkey Facilitates Talks with Iran, Following Bickering over Venues

    Turkey Facilitates Talks with Iran, Following Bickering over Venues

    Publication: Eurasia Daily Monitor Volume: 9 Issue: 74
    April 13, 2012
    By: Saban Kardas
    A new round of talks between Iran and the P5+1 group of countries (United States, France, United Kingdom, Russia, China and Germany) engaged in diplomatic efforts with the Islamic Republic is scheduled to be held in Istanbul this weekend. As the meeting comes against the background of other disputes involving the parties, the diplomacy surrounding it has been and remains extremely delicate, also putting the host, Turkey, in a difficult position.

    Ankara’s involvement in the Iranian nuclear issue has been one of the most troublesome items in its foreign policy agenda complicating not only its relations with Tehran but also the West. As the US sought to mobilize a broad-based coalition to stop Iran’s nuclear enrichment activities, on the grounds that it might have military objectives, Turkey stood against coercive approaches and argued for the utilization of diplomatic channels to address this issue. When the US pushed for a new round of sanctions in 2010, Turkey again raised similar objections and, in a joint initiative with Brazil, brokered a swap deal, resulting in the Tehran Declaration of 2010 (EDM, June 1, 2010).

    Though Turkey also vetoed the UN Security Council resolution authorizing sanctions, it eventually agreed to implement them, noting that they reflect the will of the international community. Turkey, however, underlined that it would not abide by the unilateral sanctions introduced by the US and its European allies.

    While the United States has continued to implement the sanctions to increase gradually pressure on Tehran, attempts to restart the dialogue between the two sides have been underway. Both parties expressed appreciation for Turkey’s readiness to facilitate this dialogue, which led to the talks held in January 2011 in Istanbul (EDM, January 25, 2011). The talks failed to produce any significant outcome. The efforts to resume the talks have been stalled, with Western powers asking Iran to come to the table with concrete proposals.

    Turkey continued to offer its mediation services in the middle of other diplomatic initiatives it has undertaken. These other Turkish initiatives include reaching out to Tehran and the West in regards to the Syrian crisis, and the situation in Iraq. Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s meeting with US President Barack Obama in Seoul on the occasion of the nuclear summit and his subsequent visit to Tehran enabled first-hand discussions with both parties. Again, while Ankara strongly reiterated its commitment to Iran’s right to develop and use peaceful nuclear technology, it also underlined that all military activities should be under international inspection (Anadolu Ajansi, April 5).

    Expectations were raised that Turkey’s go-between role might be paying off and negotiations could soon be held in Istanbul on April 13-14. However, the controversial statements coming from some high-ranking Iranian officials clouded the air. Despite Iranian Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Salihi’s depiction of a meeting in Istanbul as the best alternative, other officials called for holding the meeting in “friendly” countries such as Syria, Iraq or Lebanon. They criticized Turkey’s pro-Western policy in Syria and other regional problems, questioning Ankara’s neutrality (www.dunyabulteni.com, April 3).

    Having invested diplomatic credibility in this initiative, such statements were shocking for Turkish leaders. Erdogan reacted harshly, calling Iranian officials to act sincerely (Zaman, April 6). The escalating tensions could only be mitigated with direct communication between foreign ministers, and finally the Iranian side confirmed the meeting in Istanbul (www.presstv.ir, April 8).

    These verbal exchanges and Erdogan’s questioning of Iranian sincerity underscored the transformation of the bilateral relationship and Turkey’s involvement in the Iranian nuclear dispute since 2010. First, Turkey’s approach to the talks has changed. While in 2010 Turkey was actively mediating on the issue, it has retreated from that position. Already in the January 2011 meeting, Turkey underlined that it seeks to facilitate the talks, by providing a venue. However, at that time, Turkey still believed the Tehran Declaration provided a constructive framework to discuss further diplomatic initiatives, and emphasized readiness to assist the parties if they decided to address the issue along the lines contained in that declaration. Since then, however, Turkey seems to also have backtracked from that position as well, and the content of the talks have yet to be set by the parties.

    Moreover, Turkey’s relationship to both sides has been transformed to a great extent. Compared to 2010, while Turkey now enjoys more cooperative relations with the US, Ankara’s ties to Tehran have been severed over other developments in the intervening period. In 2010, Turkey was seen as largely uncritical of Tehran’s position, which even led to charges that it was pro-Iranian or providing shelter for Tehran. By the January 2011 meeting, the change in Ankara’s position was well underway. Turkey increasingly called on Iran to be more transparent and reassure the international community that its nuclear program had peaceful purposes. Turkey also moved in the direction of seeking a greater degree of protection against potential threats that might be posed by the Iranian nuclear program. Especially, Turkey’s decision to support NATO’s missile shield program and its agreement with the US for the installation of early warning radars on its soil in late 2011 were important indicators of this transformation.

    The changes in Turkey’s policy seem to have altered Tehran’s perceptions, which no longer views Ankara as a “neutral” actor. This was perhaps partly the reason why Iranian officials raised vocal objections to Istanbul as the venue for the talks. However, Iran is being negatively affected by the sanctions, which must have forced it to adopt a more conciliatory position to avoid completely losing Turkey in this dispute, hence Teheran’s agreement to hold talks in Istanbul.

    As the talks are fast approaching, there are conflicting signals about the prospects of achieving some progress. Earlier, Western officials underlined that in the talks they would seek to get Iran to suspend high-level enrichment and close down an underground nuclear facility near Qom. The Iranian officials rebuffed immediately any preconditions (www.presstv.ir, April 9). The head of Iran’s Supreme National Council, Saeed Jalili, stated that they would come to the table with a constructive approach and propose new initiatives (www.presstv.ir, April 11). Given Iran’s earlier track record, it remains to be seen if this is a sincere constructive approach or yet another delaying tactic. But in any case, it will be up to the parties to reach a common ground, not Turkey, whose sole involvement now is to facilitate this dialogue.

    https://jamestown.org/program/turkey-facilitates-talks-with-iran-following-bickering-over-venues/
  • Turkey Wants to Resume Talks on Iranian Nuclear Program

    Turkey Wants to Resume Talks on Iranian Nuclear Program

    Turkey Wants to Resume Talks on Iranian Nuclear Program

    Publication: Eurasia Daily Monitor Volume: 9 Issue: 6
    January 10, 2012
    By: Saban Kardas
    Turkish Foreign Minister, Ahmet Davutoglu, paid a crucial visit to Tehran on January 6, amidst the increasing confrontation between Iran and the West. The visit mainly provided an opportunity to address bilateral issues, as it followed a heated debate in recent months which questions whether Turkey and Iran were involved in an undeclared rivalry in the Arab Spring. The two countries’ diverging positions on Syria, Turkey’s decision to host NATO’s early warning radar, as well as differences on the Palestinians’ quest for recognition, arguably pitted the two against each other. The confrontational mood was further worsened by harsh statements against Turkey by Iranian politicians and high-ranking officials (EDM, October 11, 2011).

    As such statements even led to direct threats voiced by some Iranian lawmakers and military officers, indicating that Iran might take military action against NATO facilities in Turkey, Davutoglu was prompted to convey his uneasiness and demand an explanation. Iranian Foreign Minister, Ali Akbar Salehi, visited Ankara in an effort to allay Ankara’s growing concerns. Reiterating the two countries’ friendship, Salehi sought to assure his Turkish counterpart that such remarks reflected personal opinions and did not represent official Iranian policy on Turkey (Anadolu Ajansi, December 14, 2011).

    Ankara also downplayed such threatening remarks as personal opinions, in an effort to maintain channels for dialogue with Tehran. Though not hiding the differences of opinion on regional issues, Davutoglu and other Turkish officials prefer to focus on issues of converging views and continue to view Tehran as a major stakeholder in the region whose cooperation is essential. More importantly, Davutoglu is keen to reassure his Iranian counterparts that Turkey will not take part in any direct military action against Iran, which seems as a calculated move to comfort Tehran and convince it to steer away from the path of escalation.

    With such considerations in mind, Davutoglu paid a working visit to Iran on January 6, to meet Salehi and other Iranian officials. Davutoglu worked hard to stress the defensive nature of the ballistic missile shield and reiterated that Turkey would not let its territory be used in any attack against Iran. The two ministers also agreed to continue to discuss regional issues, and meet at least twice each year (Anadolu Ajansi, January 5).

    Beyond the immediate Turkish-Iranian frictions, Davutoglu addressed a number of regional issues with Iran. Foregoing the speculations of rivalry, Davutoglu invited his Iranian counterparts to work together in order to address the escalating tensions in the region, which some claim could lead to Sunni-Shiite sectarian divisions. In the last two days, because the uprising in Syria, the ongoing political crisis in Iraq, and the situation in Bahrain involve some sectarian elements, Davutoglu increasingly refers to an imminent danger of sectarian conflict and warns against a new Cold War in the Middle East (Dogan, January 8).

    Moreover, the uncertain future of the dispute over the Iranian nuclear program, especially in view of US sanctions policy and the Iranian brinkmanship in the Strait of Hormuz is a growing concern for Turkey. Ankara recognizes Iran’s right to develop peaceful nuclear technology, but also invites the country to be more transparent about its ongoing program and allay concerns on the part of Western powers.

    Since the talks held between Iran and the P5+1 in Istanbul one year ago, diplomatic channels were largely closed. In order to push things forward on that front, Davutoglu seems to have attempted shuttle diplomacy. In the wake of his Tehran trip, he announced that he was in touch with Catherine Ashton, the EU’s foreign policy chief, on this issue. Davutoglu raised expectations by maintaining that both parties were ready to resume nuclear talks in Turkey. Earlier, Salehi also expressed his readiness to return to nuclear talks in a suitable time and venue agreed upon by the parties, adding that Turkey would be the best option (Anadolu Ajansi, January 8). Commenting on this development, US State Department spokesperson, Victoria Nuland, said that the US remained in consultation with Turkey over Davutoglu’s trip and agrees with Turkey’s goal of bringing Iran back to the negotiating table and complying with its international obligations, though they might differ on tactics. She also emphasized Washington’s readiness to resume discussions, though adding that Iran has yet to formally convey its decision to start the talks (Today’s Zaman, January 7).

    Adding urgency to the matter, the United States and its European allies are initiating a new wave of sanctions to pressure Iran on the economic front. The sanctions recently approved by President Barack Obama involve penalizing the financial institutions doing business with Iran as well as halting oil imports from Iran, by targeting its Central Bank. Turkey abides by the sanctions regime introduced by the UN Security Council in the summer of 2010, but refuses to implement the unilateral Western sanctions on the grounds that they are non-binding. However, there has been growing US expectation for Turkey to join the new sanctions, while Ankara seeks an exemption, given its oil and gas imports from Iran, requiring it to work with Iranian financial institutions.

    A visit by a US delegation led by Deputy Secretary of State, William Burns, to Ankara on January 9, offered an opportunity to discuss these issues. During his talks with Turkish officials, the US delegation, among others, solicited Turkey’s support for unilateral sanctions. Prior to the meeting, some senior US Congressmen and diplomats visited Turkish government officials and bureaucrats, underscoring the importance attached to this issue (Haberturk, January 9).

    Commenting on the visit, Nuland dismissed the argument that Turkey opposes US policy on Iran. She emphasized that the US acknowledges Turkey’s sensitivities given Ankara’s trade ties, but the two sides will continue their dialogue on how to maximize the pressures on Iran to force it to comply with its international obligations (Haberturk, January 10). Turkish sources also reported that Ankara does not want to see a further escalation of the already heightened tensions in the region (Sabah, January 10).

    Uneasy at the growing escalation, Ankara seeks to dampen tensions through a reassertion of its facilitator role and engaging the parties, without taking any side. Once again, Turkey is walking a diplomatic tightrope due to its difficult neighbor’s relations with the West.

    https://jamestown.org/program/turkey-wants-to-resume-talks-on-iranian-nuclear-program/
  • Ankara wants a fair dialogue between the West, Iran

    Ankara wants a fair dialogue between the West, Iran

    Ankara wants a fair dialogue between the West, Iran

    Article | December 4, 2011 – 5:24pm

    NE35 1 11

    Turkey’s President Abdullah Gul speaks during a press conference, 22 November 2011. |EPA/DAN KITWOOD POOL

    Turkish President Abdullah Gul said that one need to understand the reasons which is prompting Iran to continue with its suspected nuclear a programme despite the sanctions which gravely affected the Iran’s’ economy, Zaman reported. “It is important to put oneself in their shoes and see how they perceive threats,” he said. He stressed it is not wise to view all the different groups and concentrations of power in Iran as a single entity, but refused to disclose the elements in Iran he was referring. He was commenting on a International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) report on Iran’s nuclear programme which claimed that Iran is preparing to develop nuclear weapon capability.

    A year ago, Turkey made several efforts to revive nuclear diplomacy between Iran and western nations. Turkey hosted Iran’s nuclear program in Istanbul which severely affected its image in the west and also strained ties with US. According to Gul, a frank and transparent dialogue between Iran and the western powers is necessary to ensure peace. “When I say transparent I mean Iran, and when I say frank I mean the West,” he explained. Gul added that Turkey is opposed to military options for dealing with the issue amid increasing threats from Israeli officials that it could strike Iran’s nuclear facilities if the Islamic republic does not relinquish its nuclear program. “Looking at the Middle East, one has to have a comprehensive approach to disarmament,” he added. Few weeks back, Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu said that the country strongly oppose nuclear weapons in the Middle East as there are already enough tensions in the region. Citing this situation, he said that Iran will act in a wise and responsible manner. Meantime, speaking about Syria Gul said that the country is now at a dead end. Citing UN estimates, he said that 3,500 people have been due to the eight months of unrest in Syria.

    via Ankara wants a fair dialogue between the West, Iran | New Europe.

  • UPDATE 1-Turkey: no plans for nuclear cooperation with Iran

    UPDATE 1-Turkey: no plans for nuclear cooperation with Iran

    * Iranian official had suggested nuclear cooperation with Turkey

    * Turkey, Iran have oil, gas trade ties

    * Turkey to sign oil exploration deal next week (Adds quote, oil exploration, background)

    ANKARA, Nov 16 (Reuters) – Turkey has no plans for cooperation with Iran to build nuclear power plants, Energy Minister Taner Yildiz said on Wednesday, a day after a senior Iranian official had floated the possibility.

    Mohammad Javad Larijani, a foreign affairs adviser to Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, said in New York on Tuesday that the Islamic Republic was willing to share its nuclear technology with neighbouring countries, suggesting it could help Turkey build an atomic power plant.

    “Iran is an important neighbouring country. We have oil and gas trade, but cooperation in the area of nuclear power stations is not currently on our agenda,” Yildiz told reporters.

    The U.N. nuclear watchdog reported last week that Iran appeared to have worked covertly on designing atomic bombs and may be continuing research to that end, and Tehran is under U.N. sanctions over its disputed nuclear activity.

    Larijani said that Iran was ready to share its nuclear capability with neighbours and friendly countries in the region.

    “Turkey is for years trying to have a nuclear power plant but no country in the West is willing to build that for them,” Larijani said, adding that Iran did not have a “concrete proposal” for nuclear cooperation with Turkey or another state.

    Energy-hungry Turkey has ambitious plans to build up a civil nuclear power capability and has been in talks with Russia and Japan about it. Japan’s Mitsubishi Heavy Industries is among the firms interested in a Turkish deal.

    Last year Turkey awarded Russia’s Atomstroyexport a contract to build its first nuclear power plant at Akkuyu on the country’s Mediterranean coast.

    Larijani described last week’s International Atomic Energy |Agency report on Iranian nuclear activity as “a disgrace to the professionalism of this institution”. Iran says it wants nuclear energy only for electricity, not for bombs.

    In his comments to reporters, Yildiz also said Turkey would sign an oil exploration deal next week and that the country was in talks with Shell Oil Co on the matter.

    A story in Turkish newspaper Sabah on Wednesday said Turkish oil company TPAO and Shell had reached an agreement in principle on exploration in an exclusive economic zone in the Mediterranean Sea. (Reporting by Orhan Coskun; Writing by Daren Butler; Editing by Mark Heinrich)

    via UPDATE 1-Turkey: no plans for nuclear cooperation with Iran | Reuters.

  • Iran ready to help Turkey with nuclear plant – aide

    Iran ready to help Turkey with nuclear plant – aide

    By Louis Charbonneau

    NEW YORK | Wed Nov 16, 2011 4:09am IST

    iran

    (Reuters) – An adviser to Iran’s Supreme Leader said on Tuesday that Tehran was willing to share its controversial nuclear technology with neighboring countries, suggesting it could help Turkey build an atomic power plant.

    The United States, European Union and their allies suspect Iran is trying to develop nuclear weapons and, along with the U.N. Security Council, have imposed sanctions to try to stop it from enriching uranium. But Tehran says its nuclear program is to generate electric power and refuses to halt it.

    “Iran developed a very sophisticated nuclear science and technological capability, which we are quite ready to share with … neighboring countries and friendly countries in the region,” the adviser, Mohammad Javad Larijani, said.

    “Turkey is for years trying to have a nuclear power plant but no country in the West is willing to build that for them,” Larijani told reporters. “This is true for our Arab (neighbors) in the region.”

    “We are ready to cooperate with them in this regard, while within the NPT.” He was referring to the 1968 nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, which aims to prevent the spread of atomic weapons technology.

    “We can produce (nuclear power plants) together, share the electricity,” he told Reuters in an interview. “This is also a source of income for us. It is not (just) Westinghouse that can build a nuclear facility, or Canada. Islamic Republic of Iran also is ready to build (a) nuclear facility.”

    “Also we can produce fuel,” he said. “We think about this commercial value in the future.”

    Larijani said Iran did not have a “concrete proposal” for nuclear cooperation with Turkey or another state at the moment though he said Tehran had made its willingness to help known.

    There was no immediate response to a request for a reaction to Larijani’s remarks from the Turkish U.N. mission.

    IAEA REPORT ON IRAN A “DISGRACE”

    Larijani said Iran was also willing to cooperate in the nuclear field with countries outside the region, like Brazil.

    “In some areas Brazil is ahead of us, in some areas we are ahead of Brazil,” he said. “So we can cooperate as well.”

    Both Turkey and Brazil voted against a fourth round of U.N. Security Council sanctions on Iran over its nuclear program in June 2010.

    Turkey has ambitious plans to build up a civil nuclear production capability and has been in talks with Russia and Japan about it. Japan’s Mitsubishi Heavy Industries is is among the firms interested in a Turkish deal.

    Last year Turkey awarded Russia’s Atomstroyexport a contract for the country’s first nuclear power plant at Akkuyu on the country’s Mediterranean coast.

    Larijani is an adviser to Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, head of Iran’s High Council for Human Rights, an adviser to Iran’s chief justice, and head of a mathematics and physics institute. He is also the brother of Parliament Speaker Ali Larijani.

    He is in New York ahead of a planned vote by the U.N. General Assembly’s human rights committee on a resolution condemning the human rights situation in Iran.

    Larijani’s comments on the nuclear issue came a week after the U.N. atomic watchdog issued a report saying Iran appeared to have worked on designing a nuclear weapon.

    Larijani described the International Atomic Energy Agency’s report as “a disgrace to the professionalism of this institution.”

    He made clear, however, that Tehran’s position on the crackdown against pro-democracy demonstrators in Syria, Iran’s principal Arab ally, was very different from Turkey’s. Ankara has sharply condemned the crackdown, which began in March and has killed over 3,500 civilians according to U.N. figures.

    “The best way is to leave the Syria affair to the Syrian people themselves,” he said. “We are against international meddling in this affair.”

    He accused the United States and other Western countries of supporting the opposition in Syria with weapons, an accusation that Damascus has also hurled at Washington and its allies.

    Larijani rejected Saudi accusations that Iran was fomenting unrest in Bahrain and reiterated Tehran’s denial of U.S. and Saudi allegations last month that Tehran was behind an alleged plot to assassinate the Saudi ambassador to Washington.

    (Additional reporting by Patrick Worsnip; Editing by Eric Walsh)

    via Iran ready to help Turkey with nuclear plant – aide | Reuters.