Development Director, Children Uniting Nations FOX News Blogs May 13th, 2009 Like millions of others, I rejoiced this week in the release of Roxana Saberi from an Iranian jail. Yet I also wept that my cousin, Silva Harotonian, similarly accused and convicted on political charges, remains behind in Iran’s notorious Evin Prison. After almost a year in detention, she remains caught in a tragic misunderstanding.
For the very basis on which Ms. Saberi was freed – Iran’s recognition that it and the United States are not in a state of hostility toward one another – would support Silva’s release as well under Iranian law.
Silva, an Iranian citizen of Armenian descent and Christian faith, is a kind-hearted young woman who loves poetry and helping others – hardly signs of a revolutionary or spy. She was hired by the Yerevan, Armenia, office of the International Research & Exchanges Board (IREX), a U.S.-based non-profit. An administrative aide, she supported an exchange program for U.S. and Iranian maternal and child health care professionals – exactly the type of initiative needed to increase understanding between countries.
In June 2008, during her fourth trip from Armenia to Iran for work, Silva was arrested. She was later sentenced to three years detention for allegedly creating a “soft revolution” and had her initial appeal denied. Silva has such a bright future ahead, but her health now is deteriorating, so we plead with Iranian officials to show mercy during Silva’s upcoming final appeal. Iranian officials pledged to offer Ms. Saberi speedy and fair consideration of her appeal. Our entire family – in Los Angeles, in Armenia, in Iran – hopes they will do the same for Silva. Silva’s 75-year-old mother will be waiting at the gates of Evin Prison for the day they are reunited.
Silva is ethnically Armenian – and relations between Armenia and Iran have never been stronger according leaders, including, Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Armenians celebrate their national holiday, Republic Day, on May 28. There could be no greater gesture between Iran, Armenia and the United States, and no greater testament to the central importance of mercy in Islamic and Christian faiths, than for Iran’s leaders to demonstrate their compassion by releasing Silva.
Klara Moradkhan is Development Director for Children Uniting Nations, a non-profit organization based in Los Angeles. You can view the video on public appeal for freeing Silva Harotonian (in English) via the following link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OLayZZOe3HE&feature=channel_page
You can view the video on public appeal for freeing Silva Harotonian (in Armenian) via the following link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5sndZoiSKg4&feature=channel_page
Tag: HUMAN RIGHTS
-
Please, Iran, Release My Cousin Now, Too By Klara Moradkhan
-
The unconstructive role
NYTurkishtimes published.
Evaluation of the Turkmen policy of TurkeyS O İ T M
Iraqi Turkmen Human Rights Research Foundation
There are several important factors which influence the development of the Turkmen political structure negatively, such as; the long history of isolation, exposure to the fierce assimilation policies and remaining in between two stronger nationalist communities; the Arabs and Kurds.
However, disregarding the Turkmen communal interests and the absence of co-operation and solidarity between Turkmen political groups can be considered as the most destructive factors to the Turkmen political system since the establishment of the Safe Haven area, particularly after, the occupation of Iraq.
Today, the political authority of the Iraqi Turkmen is feeble and has no power of influence.
Being the most powerful and receiver of sizeable external support, the Iraqi Turkmen Front (ITF) holds the primary responsibility for the retardation of the Turkmen political system. [1]
ITF:
* Is one of the most important obstacles in front of reforming the Turkmen political system. It refuses calls for any type of reform. The Turkmen Council which is administered by the same source is a poppet organization representing only one political view
* Is dominated by several families
* Suffers from destructive internal disagreements
* Could not gain and/or lost the support of most of the Iraqi Turkmen population and the support of the Iraqi Turkmen intellectuals and politicians.
* Is marginalized inside and outside Iraq
* Deliberately and ignorantly introduced the fundamentalist – secular discrimination into the Turkmen politics
* Its’ employment policy in the administration has:
o Openly diverted the power of the ITF, frequently, against the Turkmen national interests
o Made the Turkmen of Iraq fail to get political and logistic support from several important national, regional and international powersThe continuation of this state of affairs is certainly going to further deteriorate the Turkmen political structure and expose the Turkmen population to further disappointments while several serious challenges are approaching in the upcoming periods.
The important characteristics of the ITF system, which renders it ineffectual and inhibit its development, are:
* Several organs elect themselves, for example, the Turkmen council elects the delegation of the Turkmen Congress which elects the Turkmen council. As a result, the Turkmen council elects itself.
* The Turkmen council elects the nine members of the ITF’s executive board which elects the president of ITF. The president has absolute executive control and dominates the decision making mechanism.[2]
* The Turkmen council which was instituted as the highest Turkmen authority, remained ineffective.
* Some important offices were headed by members of the same family, in some other offices there are several members from one family.
* Dramatic variations between the expenditure of the offices.
* The expenses are greatly inflated which makes great corruptions certainly possible.
* Even simple disloyalty to the ITF will result in marginalizing or dismissing the person and his relatives who work in the ITFThe source of finance of the ITF is Turkmeneli Foundation; its headquarters is in Ankara. When the present president of ITF was elected in 2005 (in fact was appointed!) one of his relatives was appointed as the head of the Turkmeneli Foundation.
Certifying authorities of finance expenditures from the Turkmeneli Foundation are as follows: First, the owner of the ITF should agree to any type of spending, [1] then the president of the ITF and then the president of the Turkmeneli Foundation.
Continued accusation of the Turkmeneli Foundation and the Iraqi Turkmen Front for corruptions and maladministration are resulted also from the followings:
The inflated spending during the unplanned and ill-programmed annual summer meetings of the ITF for the Diaspora Turkmen organizations in Ankara.
* The huge spending during the protest meeting in Ankara in spring 2007
* The spending during the Iraqi elections of 2005.
* The great differences between the budgets of the offices of the ITF.No doubt that the freedom of expression, speech and press is considered a blessing in a democracy. This is built on the assumption that projects can be improved and developed, issues can be treated and problems can be solved if discussed.
Due to several factors, the Turkmen community, almost completely, does not publish self-criticism; furthermore, those who do it, meet great resistance. This can be considered as one of the major factors which had deteriorated the Turkmen political structure and inhibited the developments. Today, the Turkmen political structure is powerless and vulnerable.
Nowadays while the provincial elections are approaching, the Turkmen intellectual, writers and politicians are all silent about the clearly expectable defeat in the elections.
The failure of the ITF had been proved during the Iraqi general elections of 2005. The ninety thousand votes which ITF got in the election of January 2005 was decreased to seventy thousands in the election of December 2005. Worth noting that ITF:
Claims that it is the only legal representative of the Turkmen of Iraq
* Was the only Turkmen list in the aforementioned elections
* Estimates the number of the Iraqi Turkmen around 3 millions.The Turkmen population which suffers from several threatening challenges and weaknesses of its’ national power centers, has been obliged to accept the defeat. Disregarding the huge threats to the Turkmen national rights, the ITF political system remained unchanged.
Today, the Turkmen of Iraq prepare to participate in the upcoming elections by the same defeated ITF:
The absence of Turkmen public support to the ITF can be clearly detected by a simple poll in the streets of Kerkuk
* In the other Turkmen regions, the ITF suffer from even bigger problems
In this state of affairs, the expected number of Turkmen representatives in the Iraqi parliament and in the city councils will be:
* Severely decreased
* Disproportional with the size of the Turkmen in Iraq.
* Insufficient to defend the Iraqi Turkmen and not able to deal with the huge violation of the Turkmen rightsTherefore, the authorities of, particularly the owner, [1] of the ITF will hold the historical responsibilities of the defeats and losses from which the Turkmen of Iraq suffer since the early 1990s.
Wealthy cultural heritage, high percentage of educated people, the large population size and the strategic geopolitical region can be considered as the important factors which made the Turkmen of Iraq resist several decades of suppression and preserve their language and culture. Consequently, presence of powerful Turkmen political structure will help to balance the national conflicts inside Iraq and support the national and regional stability.
The revival of the Turkmen Council and freeing it from subordination, is one of the options to rescue the Turkmen political system. The Turkmen intellectuals, particularly those who played important roles in defending the Turkmen rights during the most dangerous Baath period, should be allowed to participate in the Turkmen political processes and compete for the membership of the Turkmen council. [3] The sectarian and regional discriminations in Turkmen policy should be abandoned. The Turkmen council should be opened to all the Turkmen political and civil society organizations. The Turkmen Shi’a parties, which have important numbers of parliamentarians, should be included in the Turkmen council. The Turkmen television should be handed to the professionals and sufficiently staffed. The political parties should enlarge the basic substructures and number of members. The support of the national and regional powers should be ensured.
To remove the impression of political loyalty and to increase the number and efficacy of the Turkmen civil society organizations, the funds should be established to enable them to realize their projects. The Turkmen institutions should be established and/or improved, for example, media, culture, sport, music and literature.
_______________________
Reference
* The Iraqi Turkmen front was founded by the Turkish army in 1995.
* In April 2008 and due to the despotic administration of the president of ITF, seven of the nine members of the executive board published a press release and ousted the president. Ankara refused to accept the ousting operation and demanded the change to be done through the 5th Turkmen Congress. Two Turkmen sent from Ankara and with continuous remote control, the fifth Turkmen Congress was organized, like a staged theater play. During the Congress, four of the seven members of the executive board, who expelled the ITF president and were presidents of four political parties under the ITF umbrella, were expelled out of the ITF. The other three, who were the heads of ITF offices in different regions, were silenced. The president remained unchanged.1. The largest numbers of well known Turkmen politicians, writers, high-ranking officials, academics, high-ranking retired officers, legislators could not have opportunity to participate in the Turkmen political processes.
-
2008 Human Rights Report: Turkey
pdf (239 KB)download:
2008 Human Rights Report: Turkey
BUREAU OF DEMOCRACY, HUMAN RIGHTS, AND LABOR
2008 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices
February 25, 2009Source:
Promoting freedom and democracy and protecting human
rights around the world are central to U.S. foreign policy.
The values captured in the Universal Declaration of Human
Rights and in other global and regional commitments are
consistent with the values upon which the United States was
founded centuries ago. The United States supports those
persons who long to live in freedom and under democratic
governments that protect universally accepted human
rights. The United States uses a wide range of tools to
advance a freedom agenda, including bilateral diplomacy,
multilateral engagement, foreign assistance, reporting and
public outreach, and economic sanctions. The United States
is committed to working with democratic partners,
international and regional organizations, non-governmental
organizations, and engaged citizens to support those
seeking freedom.
The Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor leads
the U.S. efforts to promote democracy, protect human
rights and international religious freedom, and advance
labor rights globally.==================
-
European court rules DNA database breaches human rights
Police forces in much of the UK could be forced to destroy the DNA details of hundreds of thousands of people with no criminal convictions, after a court ruled today that keeping them breaches human rights.
The European court of human rights in Strasbourg said that keeping innocent people’s DNA records on a criminal register breached article eight of the Human Rights Convention, covering the right to respect for private and family life.
The decision was welcomed by civil liberties campaigners, but the home secretary, Jacqui Smith, said she was “disappointed”. Police chiefs warned that destroying DNA details would make it harder to investigate many crimes.
The European court said that keeping DNA material from those who were “entitled to the presumption of innocence” as they had never been convicted of an offence, carried “the risk of stigmatisation”.
Attacking the “blanket and indiscriminate nature” of the power to retain data, the judges said protections offered by article eight “would be unacceptably weakened if the use of modern scientific techniques in the criminal justice system were allowed at any cost and without carefully balancing the potential benefits of the extensive use of such techniques against important private-life interests”.
The decision could oblige the government to order the destruction of DNA data belonging to those without criminal convictions among the approximately 4.4m records on the England, Wales and Northern Ireland database.
Scotland already destroys DNA samples taken during criminal investigations from people, who are eventually not charged or who are later acquitted.
The decision follows a lengthy legal challenge by two British men. Michael Marper, 45, was arrested in March 2001 and charged with harassing his partner, but the case was later dropped.
Separately, a 19-year-old named in court only as “S” was arrested and charged with attempted robbery in January 2001, when he was 12, but he was cleared five months later.
The men, both from Sheffield, asked that their fingerprints, DNA samples and profiles be destroyed. South Yorkshire police refused, saying the details would be retained “to aid criminal investigation”.
They applied to the European court after their case was turned down by the House of Lords, which ruled that keeping the information did not breach human rights.
Shami Chakrabarti, the director of the human rights group, Liberty, which helped fund the case, said parliament should be allowed to debate new DNA database rules.
“This is one of the most strongly-worded judgments that Liberty has ever seen from the court of human rights,” she said, arguing that the court had ensured “the privacy protection of innocent people that the British government has shamefully failed to deliver”.
Smith, however, said existing laws would remain in place while ministers considered the judgment.
“DNA and fingerprinting is vital to the fight against crime, providing the police with more than 3,500 matches a month, and I am disappointed by the European court of human rights’ decision,” she said.
“The government mounted a robust defence before the court and I strongly believe DNA and fingerprints play an invaluable role in fighting crime and bringing people to justice.”
Chris Sims, the chief constable of Staffordshire police, who speaks on forensics for the Association of Chief Police Officers, said the ruling would have a “profound impact” on policing.
Analysis of 200,000 DNA samples retained on the database between 2001 and 2005, which would have to be destroyed under today’s ruling, showed that 8,500 profiles had been linked to crime scenes, among them 114 murders and 116 rapes, said Sims.
Source: www.guardian.co.uk, December 4 2008
-
HUMAN RIGHTS IN CHINA – CONFERENCE AT THE EU PARLIAMENT
On 2nd December 2008, Human Rights Without Frontiers (Mr Willy Fautré), the ALDE and the Taiwan Foundation for Democracy organized a conference on Human Rights in China at the EU Parliament.
Mr. Dokun Isa, Secretary General of World Uygur Congress spoke about Uygur Human Rights issue.
Mr. Willy Fautré of HRWF, Mr. Dokun Isa of WUC
UNPO representatives and ITF Representative attending the conference
Prof. Zhang Chongzhi, Mr. Dokun Issa, Secretary General of WUC and
Dr. Hassan Aydinli, ITF Europe Representative
An assessment of China’s human rights record
*Human Rights Defenders *Freedom of Expression *Freedom of Religion or Belief *Tibet Issues *Uyghur Issues *Religious minority Falun Gong *One-child policy *Labour rights *Housing rights and land rights *Environmental rights *Arbitrary detention *Re-education through forced labor *Death Penalty *North Korean Refugees in China
by over a dozen of NGOs
Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, Fédération Internationale des Droits de l’Homme, Reporters Without Borders, Human Rights Without Frontiers Int’l, Solidarité Chine, China Aid, Friends of Tibet, World Uyghur Congress, CIPFG, Database Center for NK Human Rights, etc.
Members of the EU Parliament attending the meeting:
MEP Istvan Szent-Ivanyi, vice-chairman of the Delegation of the European Parliament for Relations with the Korean Peninsula
MEP Marco Cappato, author of the last human rights report of the European Parliament
MEP Helga Trüpel, member of the Delegation of the European Parliament for Relations with China
MEP Graham Watson, president of ALDE political group
MEP Edward McMillan-Scott, vice-president of the European Parliament.
Some points mentioned in Mr. Dokun Isa’s speech:
East Turkestan, also known as Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region has been military controlled by Communist China since 1949. The territorial size is 1,818.000 square kilometres (5 times the size of Germany).
At present the fundamental individual human rights and the freedoms of the Uyghurs including civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights continue to be violated. With the steady flow of Chinese settlers into East Turkestan, the Uygurs are faced with the dangerof becoming a small minority in their own country and thereby losing their cultural identity.
The Uygurs in East Turkestan face human rights abuses including arbitrary detention and imprisonment, religious repression, economic and educational discrimination, and the steady eradication of the Uyghur language and culture from public life, and the forced sterilization on Uyghur women.
240.000 young Uygur women have been transferred to China by the Chinese authorities and more than 700 Uygur women have been arrested.