Azeri genocide
Tag: History
-
History of Armenian Terrorism
SHAMIL GURBANOV,PROFESSOR,DOCTOR OF PHILOLOGY,MEMBER OF THE MILLI MEJLIS OF THE AZERBAIJAN REPUBLICActs of terrorism of Armenians began from 1896. That year they exploded a post office in Istanbul and caused the death of a number of innocent citizens. This act of terrorism caused hatred in the world community towards Armenian. But the feeling of hatred was not forever. On the contrary, later, that act of terrorism was justified by presenting Armenian people as poor and pitiful. Armenians liked that. In 1905-1907, 1918-1920, 1937, 1948-52 and 1988 they committed acts of terrorism against our nation. During the century we became victims of several open and confident acts of terrorism and exiles. Moreover, I can mention World Wars I and II. During those years Azeris suffered much from the atrocities of the Armenians. But we kept silent every time. We were forced to forget and we forgot everything.Many thanks to Mr. Heydar Aliyev, the President of the Azerbaijan Republic. He re-established the memory of our people in respect of the acts of terrorism and repressions. He created possibilities to study a true history.Armenians indicate false facts of history in their school-books. They do everything to cherish in the memory of future generation, false facts of history. While dying, Daronyan, famous Armenian writer addressed his people with the words, “Armenian if you saw and did not kill a poisoned snake you could be forgiven, but if you saw and did not kill a Turk you would not be forgiven by any Armenian”.These words indicate a wish of our thankless neighbors. We visited the grave of M. A. Rasulzada at the oldest Ankara cemetery. Near, that grave we saw graves of Turkish diplomats killed at their jobs by Armenian terrorists.39 Turkish diplomats were killed in different countries from January 27, 1973 to November 19, 1988. Their corpses were delivered to Turkey and they were buried in that cemetery. “Here are the graves of those killed by terrorists at their job places” — these are records written on their memorial monuments.I asked Turkish men, as if unaware, whether they knew by which terrorists this was done. “Of course Armenians,”-Yahya Dashdalan answered.Well, we can not ask that gentleman to accompany every visitor of this cemetery. We can no ask him to announce to everybody what was done by Armenians. The Turks wrote names of those killed and their dates of death on the memorials. Why not inform everybody about the guilty parties.While speaking about our enemies, it is necessary to point out that they teach their babies from their cradles that the Turks are the most severe enemy of Armenian.One of the Turkish gentlemen half in a joke but half in a serious way said that by mentioning names of Armenians in the records on memorials of victims would insult the spirits of those victims.Another gentleman supported my idea and said: “We had to indicate names of the guilty parties not only on the grave memorials. We should also indicate them in school-books so that our young generations are informed of enemies we met while defending our origin, nation and motherland.”A lot of people in our country think the same way. On February 28, 1906 at the meeting held in Tiflis near the Caucasian official Ahmad bay Agayev revealed and condemned the indifferent attitude of authorities towards the action of the “Dashnak” Party. He said: “Thus, there had been a 15 year old armed party. Nobody even in the government tried to prevent their atrocities. This party was even supported. So, we ourselves had to prevent these atrocities.”As a way of struggle Ahmad bay considered a suppression of terrorism. Thus, he decided to create “Difai” Party. Ganja was chosen as a motherland for this party. On the back way from Tiflis he stopped in Ganja. There he met with a progressive youth and intellectuals. He delivered a speech in a Mosque full of people. “Dear people of Ganja! We were impressed by last clash between Turks and Armenians. Neither Muslim religion nor humanity can accept such atrocities… Even wild animals did not allow themselves actions which were done by Armenians. There was no similar case in the history”.That evening Ahad bay and some intellectuals of Ganja (Alakbar Rafibayli, Alakbar and Alaskar Khasmammadov brothers, doctor Hasan Agayev and Nasib bay Usubbayov held a meeting. They came to a unanimous conclusion that “people had to be mobilized.” They did so and created “Difai”.In our 70 years of history and political resources “Difai” was considered as a party with an aim “to cause clashes between nations.” “Difai” increased very quickly. Several days later it was not possible to prevent the dissemination of proclamations calling on revenge. One of those proclamations ran: “The purpose of our party is to establish unity and sincere fraternity among the Caucasian parties. But if “Dashnak” Party continue its aggressive attacks on Muslims they will meet with severe response.”Immediately after Armenians felt in panicked and had to conclude a peace agreement. That peace lasted just 10 years. In 1918 Armenians got another beneficial situation.I would like to describe one of the scenes of 1906. It is from the memories of Omar Faig. I read a fragment of Omar Faig in Tifiis while preparing it for publication. I memorized this scene in my heart forever. Omar Faig wrote: “While passing across Vorontsov Bridge Turkish porters were thrown into river”. Thrown into water the drowning Turkish porters tried to do their best to survive. They were about to reach a shore but faced gun fire. Porters disappeared. Then the surface of the water was full of blood and corpses. It was the worst picture I had ever seen”.Such terrible scenes could be observed in almost all big Caucasian cities. Even women, children and old-aged people were not spared. In comparison with 1918 a tragedy of 1906 was not so terrible. A number of killed or brutally injured Azeris were much more increased in 1918. The situation was very difficult and the Azeris did not have guns. Well armed Armenian soldiers who came back from the Iranian front were concentrated in Baku. Leaders of those soldiers were Armenians. On March 30 the Defense Committee was established with the aim to coordinate the battle. A Committee headed by S. Shaumyan included Japaridze, Korganov, Saakyan, Yolchiyan and others. Baku was devastated within 3 days. This is a fragment from the memories of N. Narimanov: “Even if a Muslim was a bolshevik he was not spared. Dashnaks said that they did not recognize any difference whether a person was a bolshevik or not. If a person is a Muslim he should be killed. They killed everyone they wanted, destroyed and ruined every house they did not like. Using a cover of bolshevism Dashnaks were very brutal against Azeris – both women and men”. 12.000 of Azeri civilian were murdered in Baku, 7.000 in Shamakhi and the same number in Guba and other cities. Atrocities by Armenians were described by witnesses: insulted corpses of 57 Muslim women were found with their ears and noses, sex organs cut off, stomach tore off. During their massacres Armenians entered a house of 80 year old Haji Amir Aliyev and killed his old spouses (60 and 70 years old). They also cut into pieces a 3 year old baby and nailed a 25 year old woman to a wall.In this book “History of Azerbaijan Struggle for Independence” Huseyn Baygara wrote: “The massacre of Azeri Turks began in Baku on March 30, 31 and on April 1 disseminated around Shamakhi, Kurdamir, Salyan, Guba and Lankaran. Their next point of aggression was Ganja. They colluded with Armenians from Karabakh, joined forces and moved towards Ganja”.Cruelty and brutality of our enemies do not meet the norms of morality and humanity. We should not forget families burnt alive in Gazakh, burnt planes and helicopters in the sky of Garabag, our murdered brothers and sisters, fathers and mothers, our countrymen murdered in Khojaly and many others. These memories should always cause our hatred toward enemies.Our enemies will not be able to escape our revenge for that genocide. We should have revenge for each burnt village, each destroyed city and each murdered baby. We should try to do our best in this way. -
1864 Russification in the Caucasus
(right Shamil during 1830’s)Mavi Boncuk | 1864 Russification in the Caucasus [1]As part of a prolonged ‘russification’ campaign (‘ethnic cleansing’) Russian troops defeat the Circassions, the earliest indigenous people of North Caucasus (where Russia borders Asia). 90% of the population (1.5 million) are murdered or deported, making it the largest genocide of the century.
[1] The Avars rebelled again in 1834 under Imam Shamil [2], protesting against the immigration of state-supported Russian settlers. Independence for Dagestan was declared and the Koran was introduced as the law of the land. Thus, the Shamil regime fought both the Russian Orthodox Church and the older animistic beliefs. The Shamil Revolt collapsed in 1858, but the Avars already hated everything Russian. In 1864, the Russians changed the Avar Khanate into the Avar District.
In the beginning of the 19th c., the Laks fought to resist the increasing Russian influence, but to no avail. In 1865, Russia abolished the Shamkhalat and brought Lak territory under direct Russian administrative control. Russian settlers started pouring into Dagestan already from around 1800-1810, and this influx triggered the Shamil rebellion in 1834. The rebellion, which was crushed in 1858, strengthened the ethnic identities of the various peoples, radicalized and strengthened Islam in the area, and produced a deep hatred for everything Russian.
The Lezgins did not form their own country. Some were part of the Kuba Khanate in Azerbaijan, some were under control of the Derbent Khanate. The Lak Kazi Kumukh Khanate contrtolled the Lezgins for a time in the 18th c., but from 1812 onwards, the Russians took over. They created the Kiurin Khanate, later to become the Kiurin district.
From the 16th through the 18th c., the Rutuls constituted a powerful political confederation known as Rutul Mahal. Ethnic Russian settlers started pouring into the area already in the beginning of the 19th c., and the Rutuls resisted the Russian expansion. In 1838, during the widespread Shamil rebellion, the Rutul Aga-Bek led an uprising against Russia. They were no real match for the Russians, though, and the latter crushed the movement and formally annexed the Rutul Mahal in 1844. Fundamentalist Muslim tendencies are strong among the Rutuls, together with a profound anti-Russian sentiment.
When the Shamil Revolt reached the Tsakhurs in in 1844, Sultan Daniel-Bek supported the rebels against the Russians. The Russians’ answer was to deport the entire Tsakhur population to Azerbaijan in 1852. They were not allowed to return until 1860, by which time some had decided to stay in Azerbaijan. During the 1860s, when significant Russian expansion into Nogay territory began, many Nogay emigrated to Turkey, Crimea and the Balkans.
When Peter the Great occupied Derbent in 1722 and defeated the Safavid dynasty, it was the beginning of the end for Kumuk independence. Some autonomy was retained until 1859, when the Russians finally crushed the Shamil rebellion, and permanently brought the various ethnic groups of Dagestan under Russian sovereignty. The Kumuk Shamkhalat was formally ended in 1867. The Shamil rebellion also produced a division among the Kumuks, as the northern Kumuks fought against the Russians, the central Kumuks sided with the Russians, while the southern Kumuks remained neutral.
(left, Shamil after he was captured 1866)
Source: Norwegian Institute of International Affairs [NUPI] – Centre for Russian Studies[2] Shamil (c.1798–1871) Leader of Muslim resistance to the Russian occupation of the Caucasus from 1834 to 1859. He became Imam of a branch of the Sufi Naqshbandi order known as Muridism which recommended strict adherence to Islamic law and preached jihad (holy war) against Russia. After the Crimean War Russia employed some 200,000 troops in the Caucasus to encircle and subdue Shamil and his followers. He was captured (1859), and imprisoned, but allowed to go on a pilgrimage to Mecca (1870), where he died.
See also:
Russification: Word and Practice 1863-1914by Theodore R. Weeks
Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, Vol. 148, No. 4 (Dec., 2004), pp. 471-489 (article consists of 19 pages) | Published by: American Philosophical SocietyPosted by M.A.M at 12:44 AM 0 comments Links to this postLabels: Asian roots, RussiaThe Yildiz Incident | July 21, 1905
The French report “Enquitê sur l’attendant commis dans la jounée de 21 Juillet 1905 à l’issue la cérémonie de Selamlik,” Travail de la Commission Speciale. From “The Armenians in History and the Armenian Question,” Esat Uras, 1988, pp. 780-87.Mavi Boncuk |
The attempt on Sultan Abdul Hamid’s life comprised “The Yildiz Incident” (July 21, 1905), resulting from a decision by the Dashnak committee to extend their activities to Istanbul; Krisdapor Mikayelian proposed doing so at the Sofia Congress (Jan. 1904), where the idea was accepted. Mikayelian first went to Greece, getting in touch with Zaruhi, previously sent there. Zaruhi was a woman.
Another Dashnak (Sapho Torkom, a.k.a. Constantine Kabulian or Torosian) arrived afterwards in Greece with a 35-year-old from Tiflis, Marie Anchkova, a woman. The group was joined by two Armenian women, one named Robina, 65 years old. Her “code name” was “Robina Fein,” as it said on her forged passport, where she posed as a Russian Jew. (Mikayelian’s alter ego was “Samuel Fein.”)
In Istanbul, preparations were being made for the assassination attempt. Apart from Mikayelian (who would be killed in Bulgaria with another Dashnak while testing the bombs), one of the other major conspirators was Joris from Belgium, and his wife. Another was Marie Zein, a woman.
The plot was a failure, and some of the conspirators, including Sapho Torkom, were expelled from the Dashnak Committee on account of inefficiency, for abandoning their associates in Istanbul, and for being concerned with their own safety alone.
The summary of the report in French prepared by the Investigation Committee (under the leadership of Nedjib Melhame) contained information about the plotters, and among the women:
3) Robina Fein, also known as Nadejda Datalian, daughter of Wolf, an Armenian girl from the Caucasus, her real name is unknown. She participated in the plans and activities of the Committee in Istanbul and played an active role in the explosion of the bomb in the carriage.
4) Marie Zein, Sophi Arecho (fugitive), born of a German father in the Caucasus, wife of the murderer Rips, participated in the activities of the Committee and the assassination attempt of July 21, under the name of Sophi Rips. She selected Robina Fein for the above purpose and brought her to Istanbul.
Anna Nellens (fugitive), wife of Joris. Collaborated with the members of the Committee in preparing the assassination.
14) Marie Anshanev or Terez Askova, of Tiflis, her real name is unknown. Helped the Committee and assisted in the assassination attempt.
(Joris was condemned to capital punishment but was later pardoned by the sultan, given five hundred liras, and sent to Europe as a secret agent against the Armenians.)
-
Journey of Mankind
In all our cells we have genes. Genes are made up of DNA, the string-like code of life that determines what we are, from our fingernails to our innate potential for playing the piano. By analysing genes, we can trace the geographic route taken by our ancestors back to an ultimate birthplace in Africa, at the dawn of our species. Further, if we take any two individuals and compare their genes, we will find that they share a more recent ancestor – living, in all probability, outside Africa. What is more, I believe that we can now prove where those ancestors lived and when they left their homelands. This remarkable proof has become fully possible only within the last decade, as a result of pioneering work by a number of people.
Click here to play the Journey of Mankind
* The interactive genetic map is currently being upgraded and will be available online shortly.
-
UK Parliament have recognized the 1915 Genocide
Another falsified claim by Armenians!
ERMENILERIN DUNYAYA YAYDIGI BU HABER DOGRU DEGIL…
ANOTHER FALSE PROPOGANDA ITEM BY ARMENIAN DIASPORA
Dear All,
This is bending the truth,
The current EDM has only 111 signatures and to get a total of 254 MP’s they are including all the EDM’S signed to date by various MP’s. They have also disguised this EDM by calling it Holocaust Memorial Day and joining it with the actual Genocide of the Jews.
Another falsified claim by Armenians!
Best regards
Servet Hassan
Armenia Solidarity
Nor Serount Cultural Associationc/o The Temple of Peace, King Edward VIIII Ave., Cathays Park, Cardiff
07718982732
[email protected]
The Majority of eligible Members of the UK Parliament have recognized
the 1915 GenocideThis week the number of MPs in the House of Commons who have signed
motions (called Early Day Motions) recognizing the 1915 Genocide of
Armenians and Assyrians has passed 250 this week, representing the
majority of all eligible MPs. Of the 646 MPs , only 495 of them are
eligible to express their own views on these motions, because the other
151 are part of the government or have other roles which preclude their
signatures.
The number of MPs who have signed (254 exactly) did so by signing
motions in 2007 and during this parliamentary year (2009-2010), put by
Dr. Bob Spink MP, an Independent MP, at our request. The current Early
Day Motion (number 287) contains a clause which states:: “This
House….condemns unreservedly denial and denigration of the memory of
the Holocaust, as well as of the 1915 Genocide of Armenians and
Assyrians in Turkey, and the politics of hatred and division which led
to these events” and also “….. and calls on hon. Members to respect
Holocaust Memorial Day and to ensure that the Holocaust, the 1915
Genocide and modern atrocities such as the 1988 Anfal Genocide are never
forgotten”
This UK-wide Recognition of Genocide follows the example of Welsh
MPs in 2006, and 2007, and Scottish and Irish MPs a few weeks ago.
Of the 349 Labour MPs (the party of Government), 225 are eligible
and 150 (two thirds ) have signed.
Also, the majority of all non-Conservative MPs have signed (222
Labour, Liberal Democrat, Irish, Welsh and Scottish Nationalist and
Independent MPs out of 442 total non-conservative voting MPs in
nparliament ) . Most Conservative MPs do not sign such motions without
the permission of their Party, and therefore do not express their own
opinions,
The figure of 635 Voting MPs discounts the 5 Irish Sinn Fein members,
who never took up their seats, not recognizing the authority of
parliament.
Armenia Solidarity Spokesman Eilian Williams said: “. The UK, and
the other countries of the European Union must now accept that Turkey’s
present borders are based on its succesful Genocide of its Armenian and
Assyrian population. The issue of Armenian and Assyrian Churches and
lands which were confiscated by the Turkish State in the 1923 “Law of
Abandoned Properties” should be given a high priority, before any
progress is made on Turkey’s accession to the E.U.” -
What is “secularism”? Secular States in the World?
ALI AKANSU
Great Seljuq Empire
The first secular country in the history. (1037–1194)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Seljuq_Empire
What is “secularism”
?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secularism
Secular States in the World (see map)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secular_state
FORMER SECULAR STATES
Pakistan
Bangladesh
Iran
Iraq
Madagascar -
CYPRUS: EGEMEN BAGIS’DAN AN EXCELLENT MOVE
EUROPARLIAMENT CALLS ON TURKEY TO PROMPTLY WITHDRAW TROOPS FROM CYPRUS
2010-02-11
European lawmakers on Wednesday endorsed a resolution that
called on Turkey to withdraw its troops from Cyprus.As the Turkish media report, the authorities of this country urged
to take specific measures for successful completion of negotiations
on Cyprus settlement, otherwise, it may have serious consequences for
negotiations on Turkey’s joining EU. However, Turkish State Minister
& Chief Negotiator for EU talks Egemen Bagis said this resolution is
unacceptable for Turkey. “Turkey does not have a plan or opinion to
withdraw troops from the island. Turkish troops in the island assume
a very important task to restore peace there. EU process is important
for Turkey, however, it is not so important to sacrifice Cyprus”,
the minister said.