Tag: health tourism

  • Plan B from Istanbul

    Plan B from Istanbul

    All countries have their unique qualities, and any one place might seem wonderful to some and a great deal less so to others. But it’s my guess that most people who have had a chance to spend some time in Turkey would agree with me when I say that it really is a special place. Take Istanbul, perhaps the only city in the world that neatly straddles two continents. And not only geographically—Istanbul’s personality is clearly forged from both its European and Asian ties. That mix comes out in everything from the food to the politics to the language to the personalities of people you meet. (Turkey was long considered a candidate for admission to the European Union, but wasn’t admitted—and now can appreciate the fact that its economy is relatively booming, unshadowed by the deep problems of the EU.)

    Johns Hopkins Medicine has strong ties to Istanbul through its affiliate there, Anadolu Medical Center. Anadolu, too, is unique, even by Istanbul’s standards. Most health care in Turkey comes through the government, though there is an increasing presence of private sector hospitals and clinics. But Anadolu, funded by a large foundation, is relatively special in being a non-government, not-for-profit institution, in some ways resembling a U.S. academic medical center. The academic part is a work in progress, but the hospital offers much the same sort of leading-edge facilities and expertise you’d find at many U.S. medical centers. That includes two linear accelerators for nuclear medicine, robotic surgery equipment and cutting-edge imaging capabilities, with the professional staff to match. All of that has helped Anadolu establish a top-notch reputation in areas including oncology and cardiac surgery; in addition, it will soon have an organ-transplant program.

    There has never really been anything like it anywhere in the region. As a result, Anadolu attracts patients from Eastern Europe, Russia and the Middle East. Many of them are affluent, and can afford the costs of travel and of non-government-subsidized health care. Other, less-affluent patients have made considerable sacrifices to receive a higher level of care and a better chance of good outcomes for themselves and their loved ones.

    Some might say these traveler-patients are part of the “medical tourism” movement. If you’ve been reading my blog, you know how I feel about that term. I don’t like it because it blurs the distinction between two very different groups of patients: Those who shop internationally for a “good deal” in medical treatment, and who may even apply the savings to actual tourism; and those who travel because they want or need access to higher quality or more immediate care, or services that may not be available at all in their own regions. Though most of the hype you read about medical tourism applies to the former group, I think that group is actually a much smaller one than it’s made out to be—but more on that in another post.

    The point I want to make here is one that was driven home to me recently in a conversation with Bob Kiely, the head of Anadolu Medical Center, who came to the job last year after a long and much-celebrated career in U.S. hospitals. Bob’s not a physician, but he told me that he goes on rounds there every single day, just to visit with patients and families and see what’s going on in the very front lines. Each day, he makes a point of stopping by the pediatric ward and visiting some of several dozen Iraqi children who are there at any given time, having been brought to Turkey for complex treatments they couldn’t have gotten back home—typically cardiac surgery, sometimes performed at Anadolu on infants as young as six weeks old.

    You might think that a group of sick children makes for a heartbreaking scene, but Bob says it’s actually a lot of big smiles around there. The smiles are from mothers who are finally seeing their children on the road to recovery, staff who are happy to be making a difference and kids who are, well, just being kids. For Bob—and for me, too—it’s a great reminder about why we do what we do, wherever it is in the world we’re doing it.

    Call these kids medical tourists, if you want. As far as I’m concerned, they’re patients who need and deserve good care. Ideally, these patients could get that care down the block or across the city. But this is the best option they have right now, given that the people of Iraq are working to rebuild their country. While that work progresses, the staff of the Anadolu Medical Center are doing an amazing job caring for these patients and their families. I’m so proud that Hopkins and its affiliates can help provide a Plan B.

    via Plan B from Istanbul.

  • Tourists Flock to Turkey for Cheap Healthcare

    Tourists Flock to Turkey for Cheap Healthcare

    In thе laѕt decade, Turkey hаѕ invested heavily in the healthcare tourism sector, and the investments hаvе paid оff handsomely. According to thе health ministry, close to half а million foreign patients visited Turkey іn 2010. The country gained $850m frоm health tourism lаѕt year.

    “Turkey can offer good quality treatment fоr low prices,” Dr Tevfik Satir told SES Turkiye frоm Balikesir Devlet Hospital in Istanbul.

    One оf thе mоst popular medical tourism sectors іs cosmetic surgery. “Plastic surgery is a lot cheaper here. Breast implants cost around 2,000 euros. Liposuction iѕ аround 1,000 euros,” Satir said.

    Turkish hospitals havе еven begun advertising their services abroad. Some hospitals work tоgеthеr wіth tourism companies tо set up packages fоr foreign patients.

    Jinemed Hospital іn Istanbul’s Besiktas neighbourhood offers full package deals that include hotel, meals and treatment fоr patients.

    “The price for the wholе package іѕ many times cheaper than thе price for the treatment іn thе patient home country,” Leyla Arvas, а doctor working аt thе private hospital, told SES Turkiye.

    “We have а co-ordinator іn thе UK fоr оur hospital,” Arvas said. “That’s why wе get а lot of patients frоm the UK.” Both Satir and Arvas treat sеvеral foreign patients evеry week.

    Aside from the UK, mоѕt of thе tourists сome from Germany аnd thе Arab countries, sаid Arvas.

    “Turkish doctors arе good becаuѕе the medical schools аre hard in Turkey,” ѕaіd Satir, whо hаs аlso worked аs а doctor in Norway and England.

    Ozlem Baro, 26, a fоrmer employee of onе Istanbul-based health tourism company, told SES Turkiye thаt interested foreign patients сan gо online, select а treatment аnd gеt а quote.

    The company, Baro said, іѕ alwаys adding new hospitals to itѕ list, due to demand.

    With а growing number оf hospitals joining the list, company representatives arе nоt able tо visit еvеrу one. Baro said, however, thаt thе company’s practice іs to drop anу hospital if bad experiences аre reported.

    However, the company allegedly did nоt аlwауѕ follow itѕ оwn rules, Baro said.

    Last December, aftеr suffering а five-day, debilitating headache, Baro visited Istanbul’s Alman Hastanesi, оr German Hospital, whіch wаs recommended bу hеr company.

    An incorrectly performed injection beforе a brain scan forced Baro to spend thе night оn a saline drip and blood thinner, she said.

    The bill ѕhе wаѕ handed the next morning cаmе аѕ а major surprise. Yet, hеr complaints to the hospital were іgnоred аnd her company continued recommending thе hospital without hesitation.

    Other patients hаvе bеen luckier. Katy Shafig, а 32-year-old Iranian woman, hаd а good experience at thе German hospital. “The doctor dіd а good job. He booked mе а follow-up appointment. The doctor аnd thе receptionist spoke English well,” she said.

    Foreign patients are easier, claims Satir. “Turks complain аbout mаny things. Foreigners аrе nоt ѕo demanding. They won’t come to yоu аnd ask fоr their money back.”

    Yet, hе adds, аll surgeries come wіth risks аnd some doctors are tryіng to dо toо muсh in tоо lіttlе time.

    “One foreign patient died recently here. There іѕ alwaуѕ а risk оf complications,” he said.

    via Tourists Flock to Turkey for Cheap Healthcare | Southern Daily Press.

  • Health and Dental Tourism: What’s Happening in Hungary, Turkey & Oklahoma?

    Health and Dental Tourism: What’s Happening in Hungary, Turkey & Oklahoma?

    In Hungary, the dental tourism profits reach a stunning 227 million Euros annually, which means that the country has got as much as 40% share of the entire European tourism market. However, Hungary sets the stakes even higher, and wants to achieve a figure two times higher in the following three years.

    dental tourism hungary turkey oklahomaAccording to the statement of Viktor Orban, Hungary’s prime minister, dental tourism is what will set the economy of the country back on track. There will be made huge investments in the dental care field, in order to be abler to offer even higher standard care for the patients that choose Hungary as their primary spot. Moreover, Hungarian dentists are going to be kept at home by being offered incentives.

    On the other hand, Turkey has also become quite a favored dental tourism spot by foreign patients. Even medical and dental tourists from the US are traveling to Turkey for quality and cheap dental care.

    Between the years 2010 and 2014 there is estimated an increase of 26% in the field of medical & dental tourism on the market of Turkey. The government is spending a lot of money on marketing purposes for the country, while the costs of these medical services are indeed low but of high quality. In the private sector, there are also made some hefty investments, which will attract even more patients to the dental offices from Turkey. US medical travelers are also attracted by the country because Turkish hospitals have affiliations with several reputable American hospitals, such as John Hopkins or Harvard.

    The state of Oklahoma is becoming a more and more favored medical spot for oncology patients. There are offered proton therapy treatments which are available in very few regions across the US, and this fact will attract even more patients that need qualitative care in the field of cancerous diseases.

    In Costa Rica, things go from “dormant” to “robust” extremely quickly. While a few years ago, Costa Rica has been a popular medical tourist spot only for cosmetic surgery, now the country has developed a very strong healthcare system. Now, more and more medical tourists seek high quality care in fields such as oncology, cardiology, spinal cord surgery or orthopedics- because the prices are lower, and the quality of care extremely professional.

    If we have a look at the rest of the Latin America, we’ll notice a change in better as well. A couple of years ago, in Mexico or the Central Americas, there did not exist internationally accredited health facilities. Today, there are 14 Latin American health facilities operating, which have received their accreditation from the same commissions that offer accreditation to the famous US hospitals.

    The facilities are spread throughout Costa Rica, Nicaragua and Mexico – but following closely behind are El Salvador and Panama as well.

    According to Ian Youngman, researcher and writer who specializes in health care issues and health insurance in general, the fate of the medical and dental travel will go from global to local. Increasing costs for gas, accommodation, plus paying for treatments, will have patients choosing health facilities that are in the nearby of their location (US citizens seeking care within US, while Europeans will be traveling to countries within Europe).

    via Health and Dental Tourism: What’s Happening in Hungary, Turkey & Oklahoma? – Dental Health Magazine.

  • Britain has fewer high-tech medical machines than Estonia and Turkey

    Britain has fewer high-tech medical machines than Estonia and Turkey

    Britain has fewer high-tech medical machines than Estonia and Turkey

    Hospitals in Britain have fewer high-tech medical machines than those in poorer countries such as Estonia and Turkey, according to the public spending watchdog.

    By Martin Beckford, Health Correspondent 12:01AM BST 30 Mar 2011

    medical equipment

    Even those units that do have MRI and CT scanners often leave them to “lie idle” for much of the time despite rising demand, the National Audit Office said.

    It claims the NHS is not getting value for money out of the technology, particularly as trusts do not collaborate to buy them or try to get the best prices.

    Margaret Hodge, the Labour MP who chairs the Public Accounts Committee, said: “At a time when the NHS is undergoing radical reform and has the additional challenge of making billions in savings, it is even more important that it focuses on getting the best value for money from all of its assets.”

    She said the NAO report, published on Wednesday, “suggests that the NHS is not making the most of what it has got”.

    “It is not getting best value from this vital, but expensive, equipment.”

    The watchdog – which recently claimed that hospital consultants’ productivity had fallen even as their pay had risen – looked at hospitals’ use CT and MRI scanners that check patients for cancer and heart problems as well as Linear Accelerator (Linac) machines that deliver radiotherapy.

    It found that 426 CT scanners (costing £579,000 each), 304 MRI scanners (£895,000) and 246 Linac machines (£1.4million) are now in use across the NHS in England, most of them installed in the past decade.

    Yet the report added: “The UK still has fewer machines than other countries.”

    The NHS in England had 6 MRI machines per million population in 2010, with figures across Britain putting the country below the Slovak Republic, Turkey, Estonia and Ireland in a league table of provision.

    For CT scanners, there were 8.4 per million population, with Britain again trailing far poorer countries such as Greece (about 30) and the Czech Republic (about 15).

    There were 4.8 Linac machines per million population last year in the NHS, compared with about 13 in the Slovak Republic.

    About half of the machines in the NHS will need replacing over the next three years, which could cost up to £460m.

    The NAO said the number of diagnostic scans carried out using these machines has risen almost threefold over the past decade, but although the workforce has also increased “shortfalls remain in capability to deliver services”.

    Some units operating the machines are open for 40 hours a week and others as much as 100, but services that just open from 9 to 5 “are not always sufficient to cope with demand, and expensive equipment can lie idle for much of the week”.

    As a result, in some areas patients are having to wait longer than the recommended two weeks from referral for the scans to be carried out.

    Hospitals reported wide variations in the cost per scan, from £84 to £472 in MRI and from £54 to £268 in CT scans.

    As a result of a lack of comparable data and collaboration between hospitals, the study said: “NHS trusts do not have the means to know if they are making best use or getting best value out of their high value equipment.

    “Equally, they do not have the means to determine if they are getting value for money from purchasing or maintenance.

    via Britain has fewer high-tech medical machines than Estonia and Turkey – Telegraph.

  • Turkey unsuccessful in promoting health tourism assets, report says

    Turkey unsuccessful in promoting health tourism assets, report says

    ANKARA – Hürriyet Daily News

    The report said the nation-brand had an important effect on health tourism and urged the country to develop a nation-brand strategy.

    turkey can8217t promote its health tourism assets says report 2010 12 15 lTurkey has great potential for health tourism but it has been unable to effectively market its assets and brand due to the lack of an integrated approach, a recent report has said.

    “Our country is an important center of attraction for health tourism with healthcare facilities, trained human resources, technological infrastructure and accumulation of experience,” said the report, titled “Turkish and Global Perspective: Heath Tourism 2010” and published by the Health Foundation of Turkey. The country, however, could explore its real potential through stronger coordination between the government, civil society and the private sector as well as through more powerful international promotion and marketing strategies, the report added.

    Turkey ranks among the top 10 countries in terms of tourism income. The country has great potential for health tourism, taking into consideration its geographical location, natural and historical wonders, climate and current healthcare infrastructure, the report said.

    Citing expert views, the report said the nation-brand had an important effect on health tourism and urged the country to develop a nation-brand strategy that could be clearly expressed and promoted.

    According to Yılmaz Argüden, an academic who teaches strategy at Boğaziçi and Koç universities, the brand needs to be perceived not just as an instrument of promotion but as part of a strategy.

    “We need to build the brand of Turkey on values that really exist. Turkey is a multidimensional country and it is not possible to promote all aspects of it. We need to select some of these dimensions and really focus on them,” he said.

    Argüden said the selected aspects should be distinctive for Turkey.

    Advantages, disadvantages

    Assistant Professor İpek Altınbaşak of Bahçesehir Üniversity’s Faculty of Business Administration said Turkey should rid itself of the “cheap country” label and highlight its diversity and lifestyle to draw more tourists.

    Turkey’s promising health tourism facilities are also reflected in the statistics, as the Foreign Economic Relations Board of Turkey, or DEİK’s, 2009 comparative prices analysis revealed Turkey as the most attractive country for major medical operations compared to other tourism destinations, including the United States.

    The average price for a heart valve replacement in Turkey, for instance, is $16,950 while it costs $58,250 in the U.S., $25,000 in England and $47,794 in Switzerland, according to the report.

    According to data provided by the Turkish Statistics Institute and the Central Bank, 103,400 foreign patients came to Turkey for treatment in 2003, spending $91 million, while the figure was 162,480 at $282 million in 2008 and 132,680 at $225 million in 2009.

    The report cites the high-quality infrastructure of hospitals, comparative price advantages, geographical location, suitable climactic conditions and tourism facilities at high standards in addition to well-trained staff with a command of foreign languages as advantages for health tourism in Turkey.

    The lack of cooperation between the state, nongovernmental organizations and the private sector, the lack of a sufficient number of experts including doctors and nurses trained in the area of health tourism and a lack of legislation are mentioned as the basic disadvantages of Turkey in terms of health tourism in the report.