Tag: Gulen

  • Fethullah Gülen’s Grand Ambition –  Turkey’s Islamist Danger

    Fethullah Gülen’s Grand Ambition – Turkey’s Islamist Danger

    Middle East Forum
    January 12, 2009

    MEF Home |    Research & Writings |   Middle East Quarterly

    Related Articles

    • Will Turkey Have an Islamist President?
    • Turkish Islam’s Moderate Face
    • Turkey’s Leaders – Erbakan’s Goals

    Fethullah Gülen’s Grand Ambition
    Turkey’s Islamist Danger

    by Rachel Sharon-Krespin
    Middle East Quarterly
    Winter 2009, pp. 55-66

    https://www.meforum.org/2045/fethullah-gulens-grand-ambition

    TURKCESI      ….   https://www.turkishnews.com/tr/content/2009/04/06/fethullah-gulenin-buyuk-ihtirasi-turkiyedeki-islamcilik-tehlikesi/

    As Turkey’s ruling Justice and Development Party (Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi, AKP) begins its seventh year in leadership, Turkey is no longer the secular and democratic country that it was when the party took over. The AKP has conquered the bureaucracy and changed Turkey’s fundamental identity. Prior to the AKP’s rise, Ankara oriented itself toward the United States and Europe. Today, despite the rhetoric of European Union accession, Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has turned Turkey away from Europe and toward Russia and Iran and reoriented Turkish policy in the Middle East away from sympathy toward Israel and much more toward friendship with Hamas, Hezbollah, and Syria. Anti-American, anti-Christian, and anti-Semitic sentiments have increased. Behind Turkey’s transformation has been not only the impressive AKP political machine but also a shadowy Islamist sect led by the mysterious hocaefendi (master lord) Fethullah Gülen; the sect often bills itself as a proponent of tolerance and dialogue but works toward purposes quite the opposite. Today, Gülen and his backers (Fethullahcılar, Fethullahists) not only seek to influence government but also to become the government.

    In 1998, Fethullah Gülen left Turkey for the United States, reportedly to receive medical treatment for diabetes. Since his voluntary exile, Gülen has resided on a large, rural estate in eastern Pennsylvania, together with about 100 followers, who guard him and tend to his needs. It is from his U.S. base that Gülen has built his fame and his transnational empire.

    Today, Turkey has over 85,000 active mosques, one for every 350 citizens—compared to one hospital for every 60,000 citizens—the highest number per capita in the world and, with 90,000 imams, more imams than doctors or teachers. It has thousands of madrasa-like Imam-Hatip schools and about four thousand more official state-run Qur’an courses, not counting the unofficial Qur’an schools, which may expand the total number tenfold. Spending by the governmental Directorate of Religious Affairs (Diyanet Işleri Başkanlığı) has grown five fold, from 553 trillion Turkish lira in 2002 (approximately US$325 million) to 2.7 quadrillion lira during the first four-and-a-half years of the AKP government; it has a larger budget than eight other ministries combined.[1] The Friday prayer attendance rate in Turkey’s mosques exceeds that of Iran’s, and religion classes teaching Sunni Islam are compulsory in public schools despite rulings against the practice by the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) and the Turkish high court (Danıştay).[2] Both Prime Minister Erdoğan and the Diyanet head Ali Bardakoğlu criticized the rulings for failing to consult Islamic scholars.

    Gülen now helps set the political agenda in Turkey using his followers in the AKP as well as the movement’s vast media empire, financial institutions and banks, business organizations, an international network of thousands of schools, universities, student residences (ışıkevis), and many associations and foundations. He is a financial heavyweight, controlling an unregulated and opaque budget estimated at $25 billion.[3] It is not clear whether the Fethullahist cemaat(community) supports the AKP or is the ruling force behind AKP. Either way, however, the effect is the same.

    Gülen’s Background

    Born in Erzurum, Turkey, in 1942, Fethullah Gülen is an imam who considers himself a prophet.[4] An enigmatic figure, many in the West applaud him as a reformist and advocate for tolerance,[5] a catalyst of “moderate Islam” for Turkey and beyond. He is praised in the West, especially in the United States, as an intellectual, scholar, and educator[6] even though his formal education is limited to five years of elementary school. After receiving an imam-preacher certificate, he served as an imam, first in Erdirne and later in Izmir. In 1971, the Turkish security service arrested him for clandestine religious activities, such as running illegal summer camps to indoctrinate youths, and was, from that time on, occasionally harassed by the staunchly secular military.[7] In 1981, he formally retired from his post as a local preacher.

    To build an image as a proponent of interfaith dialogue, Gülen met Pope John Paul II, other Christian clergy, and Jewish rabbis[8] and emphasizes the commonalities unifying Abrahamic religions. He presents himself and his movement as the modern-day version of tolerant, liberal Anatolian Sufism and has used the literature of great Sufi thinkers such as Jalal ad-Din Rumi and Yunus Emre, pretending to share their moderate teachings.[9]Quotes from their teachings adorn Fethullah’s Gülen’s propaganda material. The movement, its proxy organizations, and universities—including Georgetown, to which it donates money—hold conferences in the United States and Europe to discuss Gülen. In October 2007, the British House of Lords feted Gülen with a conference in his honor.

    Gülen was a student and follower of Sheikh Sa’id-i Kurdi (1878-1960), also known as Sa’id-i Nursi, the founder of the Islamist Nur (light) movement.[10] After Turkey’s war of independence, Kurdi demanded, in an address to the new parliament, that the new republic be based on Islamic principles. He turned against Atatürk and his reforms and against the new modern, secular, Western republic.

    In 1998, Gülen departed for the United States, reportedly to receive medical treatment for diabetes. However, his absence also enabled Gülen to escape questioning on his indictment in 2000 for allegedly promoting insurrection in Turkey in a series of secretly-recorded sermons. Since his voluntary exile, Gülen has resided on a large, rural estate in eastern Pennsylvania, together with about 100 followers, who guard him and tend to his needs. These servants are educated men who wear suits and ties and do not look like traditional Islamists in cloaks and turbans. They follow their hocaefendi‘s orders and even refrain from marrying until age fifty per his instructions. When they do marry, their spouses are expected to dress in the Islamic manner, as dictated by Gülen himself.[11] It is from his U.S. base that Gülen has built his fame and his transnational empire.

    Gülen’s Education Network

    The core of Gülen’s network is his educational institutions. His school network is impressive. Nurettin Veren, Gülen’s right-hand man for thirty-five years, estimated that some 75 percent of Turkey’s two million preparatory school students are enrolled in Gülen institutions.[12] He controls thousands of top-tier secondary schools, colleges, and student dormitories throughout Turkey, as well as private universities, the largest being Fatih University in Istanbul. Outside Turkey, his movement runs hundreds of secondary schools and dozens of universities in 110 countries worldwide. Gülen’s aim is not altruistic: His followers target youth in the eighth through twelfth grades, mentor and indoctrinate them in the ışıkevi, educate them in the Fethullah schools, and prepare them for future careers in legal, political, and educational professions in order to create the ruling classes of the future Islamist, Turkish state. Taking their orders from Fethullah Gülen, wealthy followers continue to open schools and ışıkevi in what Sabah columnist Emre Aköz called “the education jihad.”[13]

    The overt network of schools is only one part of a larger strategy. In a 2006 interview, Veren said, “These schools are like shop windows. Recruitment and Islamization activities are carried out through night classes … Children whom we educated in Turkey are now in the highest positions. There are governors, judges, military officers. There are ministers in the government. They consult Gülen before doing anything.”[14]

    The AKP’s controversial education policies, coupled with the Islamist indoctrination in Fethullahist schools, have accelerated the Islamization of Turkish society. During AKP’s first term in government, the Erdoğan government has changed textbooks, emphasized religion courses, and transferred thousands of certified imams from their positions in the Directorate of Religious Affairs to positions as teachers and administrators in Turkey’s public schools.[15] Abdullah Gül, Turkey’s first Islamist president and a Gülen sympathizer, appointed a Gülen-affiliated professor, Yusuf Ziya Özcan, to head Turkey’s Council of Higher Education (Yükseköğretim Kurulu, YÖK). He has also used his presidential prerogative to appoint Gülen sympathizers to university presidencies.

    Beyond Turkey, the Fethullahist schools also serve as fertile recruiting grounds. In his Institut d’Etudes Politiques doctoral thesis on Gülen schools in Central Asia, Bayram Balcı, a French scholar of Turkish origin, wrote, “Fethullah’s aim is the Islamization of Turkish nationality and the Turcification of Islam in foreign countries. Dozens of Fethullah’s ‘Turkish schools’ abroad—most of which are for boys—are used to covertly ‘convert,’ not so much ‘in school,’ but through direct proselytism ‘outside school.’” Balcı explained, “He wants to revive the link between state, religion, and society.”[16] The schools of Gülen’s Nur movement in Central Asia have worked to reestablish Islam in a region largely secularized by decades of Soviet control. Balcı explained, “The aim of thecemaat is to educate and influence future national elites, who will speak English and Turkish and who will one day prove their good intentions towards Fethullahists and towards Turkey.” Several countries in the region have taken steps against Gülen’s educational institutions because of such suspicions. Uzbekistan has banned the schools for encouraging Islamic law,[17] and the Russian government, weary of the movement’s activities in majority Muslim regions of the federation, has banned not only the Gülen schools but all activities of the entire Nur sect in the country.[18]

    Neither Uzbekistan nor Russia are known for their pluralism, but suspicion about Gülen indoctrination has spread even to more permissive societies such as that of the Netherlands. In 2008, members of the Netherland’s Christian Democrat, Labor, and Conservative parties agreed to cut several million euros in government funding for organizations affiliated with “the Turkish imam Fethullah Gülen” and to thoroughly investigate the activities of the Gülen group after Erik Jan Zürcher, director of the Amsterdam-based International Institute for Social History, and five former Gülen followers who had worked in Gülen’s ışıkevi told Dutch television that the Gülen community was moving step-by-step to topple the secular order.[19] While the organizations in question denied any ties to the Gülen movement, Zürcher said that taqiya, religiously-sanctioned dissimulation, was typical in the movement’s interactions with the West. An unnamed former Gülen follower who also once worked in Gülen schools and ışıkevi reported that Fethullahists called the Dutch “filthy, blasphemous infidels” and that they said “the best Dutchman is one who has converted to Islam. All the Dutch must be made Muslims.”[20] Indeed, of the thousands of Fethullahist schools in more than one hundred countries that allegedly teach moderation, none are located in countries such as Saudi Arabia or Iran that exist under domineering strains of official Islam, and most appear instead geared to radicalize students in secular Muslim and non-Muslim societies.

    Eviscerating Checks and Balances

    Fethullahists have also made inroads into Turkey’s 200,000-strong police force. Their infiltration has had a compounding effect, as Fethullahist officials have purged officials more loyal to the republic than the hocaefendi. According to Veren, “There are imam security directors; imams wearing police uniforms. Many police commissioners get their orders from imams.”[21] Adil Serdar Saçan, former director of the organized crimes unit within the Istanbul Directorate of Security, confirmed these statements in reports he prepared on the Fethullahist organization within the security apparatus. In a 2006 interview, he said,

    Fethullahists began organizing inside the security apparatus in the 1970s. In police academies, students were being taken to ışıkevi by class commissioners. One of those commissioners is now the director of intelligence at the Turkish Directorate of Security. During my time at the [police] academy, those in the directorate who did not have ties to the [Gülen] organization were all pensioned off or fired in 2002 when the AKP came to power. … I was at the top of my class when I graduated from the police academy, and throughout the twenty-four years of my career, I maintained and was honored for my stellar record. After 2002, the AKP blocked my promotions. They promoted only those officers whose files were tainted with allegations that they were engaged in reactionary Islamist activities. … Belonging to a certain cemaat has become a prerequisite for advancement in the force. At present, over 80 percent of the officers at supervisory level in the general security organization are members of the [Gülen] cemaat.[22]

    Such statements, however, may have consequences.[23] In October 2008, Turkish police arrested Saçan on suspicion of involvement in the so-called Ergenekon plot to overthrow the Turkish state.[24] Most Turkish analysts believe that the Ergenekon conspiracy, short of any evidence of unconstitutional activities, is more a mechanism by which the Turkish government can harass critics.[25]

    Writer and journalist Merdan Yanardağ provided statistics to illuminate the Islamist penetration of the Ankara Directorate of Security. He explained,

    Prior to Ramadan, personnel at the Directorate of Security in Ankara were asked whether they would be fasting during Ramadan, in order to establish the number of meals that would be needed during that period. Of the 4,200 employees, only seventeen indicated that they would not be fasting. Considering that some of the seventeen might have been sick or taking medications, the numbers speak for themselves. [26]

    Wiretapping scandals in spring 2008 also highlighted Gülenist penetration of the security service’s most important units. After the Turkish Security Directorate obtained a blanket court permit in April 2007 to monitor and record all the communications in Turkey including mobile and land-line telephones, SMS text messaging, e-mail, fax, and Internet communications,[27] Turks have grown uneasy about having telephone conversations fearing intrusion into their privacy. Recent leaks to pro-AKP media of recordings of military personnel meetings, lectures, top secret military documents, strategic antiterrorism plans, private medical files of commanders, and contents of personal conversations between state prosecutors have shocked the nation as has the appearance on the Internet video site YouTube of some of those recordings.

    The alleged network of Fethullah followers in the security system has an impact on domestic affairs as they use restricted technology or privileged information to further their political agenda. In February 2008, for example, several websites posted the voice recording of a secret speech delivered by Brig. Gen. Münir Erten announcing the timing of an upcoming Turkish military operation into Iraqi Kurdistan, details of a private discussion with the chief of the General Staff, and private information concerning Gen. Ergin Saygun’s health.[28] The following month, several websites including YouTube posted a secretly recorded conversation between prosecutor Salim Demirci and a colleague regarding Erdoğan and Efkan Ala, then governor of Diyarbakir and subsequently a counselor of Erdoğan’s office. Erdoğan responded by ordering a criminal investigation against Demirci.[29] In June 2008, the Islamist Vakit published Saygun’s entire medical file, disclosing information about his diabetes as well as the treatments and medications he had received in the Gülhane military hospital.[30] Others whose tapped conversations appeared on Islamist websites and in Gülen’s newspaper network included Erdoğan Teziç, the former head of Turkey’s Higher Education Council, and prominent members of the center-left opposition Republican People’s Party (Cumhuriyet Halk Partisi, CHP). Many Turkish journalists believe that Fethullahist-dominated police tap their communications, and according to reports, the head of the wiretapping unit, who was appointed by Erdoğan in August 2005, is a Fethullah follower.[31] Islamist newspapers including Vakit, Yeni Şafak, Zaman, and the pro-AKP Taraf published leaks from private conversations held inside government offices and military headquarters. The Islamist, pro-AKP media has reported alleged confidential evidence relating to the police investigation of the so-called Ergenekon plot that posits a secularist cabal of military officers, journalists, and professors sought to overthrow the AKP government.[32] The net effect of such leaks is to tar the reputations of or intimidate AKP’s political opponents and the Turkish military.

    Islamization within police ranks also contributes to police brutality against anti-AKP demonstrators. On May 1, 2008, the police used gas bombs, pepper gas, water cannons, and clubs against workers who wanted to celebrate May Day peacefully in Istanbul’s Taksim Square, the traditional site of demonstrations in Turkey’s largest city; scores were injured.[33] Labor unions and opposition parties condemned the police brutality and accused Erdoğan of using police to silence opposition voices.[34] Police also suppressed labor protests in Tuzla (Istanbul) shipyards.[35] Similarly, police have harassed individual citizens after they criticized Erdoğan’s policies. Erdoğan’s own security guards abducted a 46-year-old man from Antalya for speaking out in public against his social security policies, taking the man to a deserted location where the guards beat and threatened him. The victim alleged that his attackers said they could easily plant guns or drugs on him and kill him.[36]

    While Turkey’s military is guarantor of the constitution, Veren alleged that Fethullahists had also entrenched themselves within the military, police, and other professions:

    The Fethullahist military officers were once our students, who we financially supported, educated, and assisted. When these grateful children graduated and reached influential positions, they put themselves and their positions at the service of Fethullah Gülen … [Gülen] directs and instructs, and, through them, maintains power within the state … When Gülen’s students graduate from the police or military academies—as do the new doctors and lawyers—they present their first salaries to Fethullah Gülen as a gesture of their gratitude. Newly graduated officers even bring him the swords that they receive during the graduation ceremony.[37]

    According to Veren, Gülen has argued that the military expels no more than one in forty Islamist officers; the rest remain in undercover cells. While such allegations may seem the stuff of conspiracy theory, recent leaks to pro-AKP media suggest a number of Islamist sources within the military ranks, creating speculation that followers of Gülen now populate the senior infrastructure of the Turkish General Staff. Such speculation gained additional credence after the August 2008 Supreme Military Council (Yüksek Askeri Şura, YAŞ), which, for the first time, declined to expel suspected Islamists from military ranks.

    The AKP government has also aided the Gülen movement with its reorientation of the judiciary. Over the first five years of his rule, Erdoğan replaced thousands of judges and prosecutors with AKP appointees. Now that the president is Islamist, it is unlikely that he would veto the appointment of Islamists to the bench, as did his predecessor Ahmet Necdet Sezer. Indeed, it now appears that the government intends to appoint thousands more to judicial positions.[38] The AKP has also enacted a law that would require applicants for judgeships to first interview with AKP bureaucrats in order better to gauge and adjudicate applicants’ adherence to Islam. The results of the AKP’s targeting of the judicial system are already apparent as anti-secular, pro-AKP officials have been at the forefront of some controversial trials, such as the case against Van University president Yücel Aşkın,[39] the Şemdinli investigation in which the prosecutor tried to implicate Gen. Yaşar Büyükanıt before he became chief of the General Staff, and, most recently, the Ergenekon probe.

    Indeed, it is such overtly political and vindictive prosecutions that have led some former Gülen sympathizers, such as University of Utah political scientist Hakan Yavuz, to a change of heart. In one interview, Yavuz toldodatv.com that four important legal cases had changed his thinking: the case against Aşkın; the Semdinli case; the Atabeyler operation, uncovered in 2005, involving an organized crime group with alleged plans to assassinate Prime Minister Erdoğan;[40] and the Ergenekon probe. Yavuz explained, “The cemaat has attempted to steer all four cases. Look at the slanderous reports in archives of the cemaat‘s newspapers, how they defamed Yucel Aşkın. And now it’s Ergenekon. Keeping [prominent] personalities in jail for over a year without indictment is inexplicable.” Yavuz also suggested Gülen’s cemaat spoke differently to its members than to outsiders and that it was pursuing a political agenda that conflicted with the founding philosophy of the modern Turkish republic. He accused Fethullahists of “co-optation” and said that they were recruiting people and paying them money—without any formal receipts or records—to write and speak favorably about the movement while criticizing the secular Turkish state.[41]

    The Fifth Estate

    If the police, military, and courts might normally protect rule-of-law from within official Turkish government structures, there might still be an external check to abuse of power in the Turkish media. The Turkish media has traditionally been relentless in its reporting of abuses of power and corruption. Soon after assuming office, however, Erdoğan proved intolerant of the concept of a free press. The AKP government has systematically sought to create a media monopoly to speak with one voice and on behalf of the government. Erdoğan lashes out at media organs that he does not control. In his first term, Erdoğan brought more than a hundred lawsuits against sixty-three journalists in sixteen publications, against many writers, as well as the leaders and members of parliament of all opposition parties. The number of lawsuits may be far greater. In 2008, Erdoğan declined to answer a parliamentary inquiry by a Democratic Left Party deputy demanding information on how many lawsuits Erdoğan had initiated against journalists—claiming that such information was in the realm of his private life.”[42]Most of Erdoğan’s lawsuits against journalists involve criticism that any other democracy would consider legitimate. In 2005, for example, he sued Cumhuriyet cartoonist Musa Kart for depicting him as a cat entangled in a ball of string. Last year, he sued the LeMan weekly humor magazine for ridiculing him in its January 30, 2008 cover.[43]

    Erdoğan lost some of his lawsuits, and courts threw out others, but the effect has nonetheless been chilling. Journalists know that not only does the prime minister seek to make them financially liable for any criticism, but that the AKP might even seek to assume control of their publications. During AKP’s 6-year rule, the government has seized control of several media outlets and subsequently sold them to pro-AKP holdings affiliated with the Gülen community. In April 2007, for example, the governmental Saving Deposit Insurance Fund (Tasarruf Mevduatı Sigorta Fonu, TMSF) seized Sabah-ATV, Turkey’s second largest media group in a predawn raid. The TMSF, staffed by Erdoğan appointees, then sold the group to Çalık Holding, the CEO of which is Erdoğan’s son-in-law. Çalık financed the purchase with public funds taken as loans from two state-owned banks and by partnering with a newly-founded, Qatar-based media company that bought 25 percent of Sabah shares. It was Abdullah Gül who introduced Ahmet Çalık to Qatari Emir Hamad bin Khalifa during his January 2008 visit in Syria; Çalık also accompanied Gül in February and Erdoğan in April when they visited Qatar. Media reports indicated that other consortiums that had initially shown interest in purchasing Sabah-ATV with their own money pulled out of the tender shortly before the bid after Erdoğan contacted them, leaving Çalik the sole bidder.[44] Sabah has since become a strong advocate of the AKP government. In September 2008, Erdoğan demanded all party members and aides boycott newspapers owned by the Doğan Media Group after it reported on laundering of money to Islamist charities.[45]

    Excluding the Islamist television and radio stations, newspapers such as Zaman, Sabah, Yeni Şafak, Türkiye,Star, Bugün, Vakit, and Taraf all have AKP and/or Gülen-affiliated ownership. By circulation, such papers represent at least 40 percent of all newspaper sales in Turkey.[46]

    What Are Gülen’s Intentions?

    Conglomerates have long had a dominant position in Turkish society. Secular businessmen such as Aydın Doğan and Mehmet Emin Karamehmet have interests not only in industry but also in media, the banking sector, and even education. Never before, though, has a single individual started a movement that seeks to transform Turkish society so fundamentally. Gülen now wields a vocal partisan media; a vast network of loyal bureaucrats; partisan universities and academia; partisan prosecutors and judges; partisan security and intelligence agencies; partisan capitalists, business associations, NGOs, and labor unions; and partisan teachers, doctors, and hospitals. What makes Gülen so dangerous? Gülen’s own teaching and sermons provide the best answers.

    In 1999, Turkish television aired footage of Gülen delivering sermons to a crowd of followers in which he revealed his aspirations for an Islamist Turkey ruled by Shari’a (Islamic law) as well as the methods that should be used to attain that goal. In the sermons, he said:

    You must move in the arteries of the system without anyone noticing your existence until you reach all the power centers … until the conditions are ripe, they [the followers] must continue like this. If they do something prematurely, the world will crush our heads, and Muslims will suffer everywhere, like in the tragedies in Algeria, like in 1982 [in] Syria … like in the yearly disasters and tragedies in Egypt. The time is not yet right. You must wait for the time when you are complete and conditions are ripe, until we can shoulder the entire world and carry it … You must wait until such time as you have gotten all the state power, until you have brought to your side all the power of the constitutional institutions in Turkey … Until that time, any step taken would be too early—like breaking an egg without waiting the full forty days for it to hatch. It would be like killing the chick inside. The work to be done is [in] confronting the world. Now, I have expressed my feelings and thoughts to you all—in confidence … trusting your loyalty and secrecy. I know that when you leave here—[just] as you discard your empty juice boxes, you must discard the thoughts and the feelings that I expressed here.

    He continued,

    When everything was closed and all doors were locked, our houses of isik [light] assumed a mission greater than that of older times. In the past, some of the duties of these houses were carried out by madrasas [Islamic schools], some by schools, some by tekkes [Islamist lodges] … These isik homes had to be the schools, had to be madrasas, [had to be] tekkes all at the same time. The permission did not come from the state, or the state’s laws, or the people who govern us. The permission was given by God … who wanted His name learned and talked about, studied, and discussed in those houses, as it used to be in the mosques.[47]

    In another sermon, Gülen said,

    Now it is a painful spring that we live in. A nation is being born again. A nation of millions [is] being born—one that will live for long centuries, God willing … It is being born with its own culture, its own civilization. If giving birth to one person is so painful, the birth of millions cannot be pain-free. Naturally we will suffer pain. It won’t be easy for a nation that has accepted atheism, has accepted materialism, a nation accustomed to running away from itself, to come back riding on its horse. It will not be easy, but it is worth all our suffering and the sacrifices.[48]

    And, in yet another sermon, he declared,

    The philosophy of our service is that we open a house somewhere and, with the patience of a spider, we lay our web to wait for people to get caught in the web; and we teach those who do. We don’t lay the web to eat or consume them but to show them the way to their resurrection, to blow life into their dead bodies and souls, to give them a life.[49]

    Many Gülen supporters and members of the Islamist media affiliated with the cemaat suggested the sermons were somehow forged[50] but the denials are unconvincing given the video footage and reports by Gülen movement defectors.

    U.S. Government Support for Gülen?

    Many Turkish analysts believe that, prior to Erdoğan’s election, Gülen and his supporters in the U.S. government helped obtain an invitation to the White House for him at a time when Erdoğan was banned from politics in Turkey due to his Islamist activities—an event viewed as a U.S. endorsement ahead of the 2002 Turkish elections. That the U.S. government and, specifically, the Central Intelligence Agency support the Gülen movement is conventional wisdom among Turkey’s secular elite even though no hard evidence exists to support such allegations.

    When Turkish secularists are asked to defend the view that Gülen enjoys U.S. support, they often point to his almost 20-year residence in eastern Pennsylvania. After the Supreme Court of Appeals in Turkey (Yargıtay) confirmed on June 24, 2008, a lower court’s ruling to acquit Gülen on charges that he organized an illegal terrorist organization to overthrow the secular government in Turkey, Gülen won another legal battle, this time in the United States. A federal court reversed U.S. Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service decisions that would have denied Gülen’s application for permanent residency in the United States on the basis that Gülen did not fit the criteria as someone with “extraordinary ability in the field of education.” The Department of Homeland Security characterized Gülen as neither an expert in the field of education nor an educator but rather as “the leader of a large and influential religious and political movement with immense commercial holdings.”[51]

    While the court ruling that allowed Gülen to remain in the United States may provide fodder for Turkish analysts who suggest U.S. support for Gülen, the process is actually more revealing. Indeed, the U.S. government noted that much of the acclaim Gülen touts is sponsored or financed by his own movement. Gülen attached twenty-nine letters of reference to his June 18, 2008 motion, mostly from theologians or Turkish political figures close to or affiliated with his organization. John Esposito, founding director of the Saudi-financed Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding, who, after receiving donations from the Gülen movement sponsored a conference in his honor, also supplied a reference. Two former CIA officials, George Fidas and Graham Fuller, and former U.S. ambassador to Turkey Morton Abramowitz also supplied references.

    The letters may have worked. On July 16, 2008, U.S. district judge Stewart Dalzell issued a memorandum and order granting Gülen’s motion for partial summary judgment and ordering the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service to approve his petition for alien worker status as an alien of extraordinary ability by August 1, 2008. The court found that the immigration examiner improperly concluded that the field of education was the only statutory category in which Gülen’s accomplishments could fit and that Gülen’s accomplishments in such fields as theology, political science, and Islamic studies should also be considered. The court further determined that the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service Administrative Appeals Office erred in concluding that Gülen’s work was not “scholarly” by applying an unduly narrow definition of the term. Finally, with regard to the statutory requirement that the applicant show that his or her entry into the United States would substantially benefit the United States, the court found that Gülen had met the requirement.[52]

    Regardless of the legal rationale behind his current stay, the U.S. decision to grant Gülen residency will enable his movement to continue to imply Washington’s endorsement as the AKP and its Fethullahist supporters seek to push Turkey further away from the secularism upon which it was built.

    Conclusions

    Gülen enjoys the support of many friends, ideological fellow-travelers, and co-opted journalists and academics. Too often, concern over Gülen’s activities is dismissed in the Turkish, U.S., and European media as mere paranoia. When Turkey’s chief prosecutor indicted the AKP for attempting to undermine the secular constitution, the pro-Islamist media in Turkey along with Western diplomats and journalists dismissed the case as an “undemocratic judicial coup.”[53] Yet at the same time, many of the same outlets and officials have hailed the Ergenekon indictment, assuming a dichotomy between Islamism and democracy on one hand, and secularism and fascism on the other.[54] The repeated branding in Islamist outlets of Turkey’s Islamists as “reformist democrats” and of modern, secular Turks as “fundamentalists” has to be one of the most offensive but sadly effective lies in modern politics.

    Indeed, Turkey has never seen a single incident of attacks on pious Muslims for fasting during Ramadan, whereas in recent years there have been many incidents of attacks on less-observant Turks for drinking alcohol or not fasting.[55] While women who cover their heads in the Islamic manner can move freely in any area of the country, uncovered women are increasingly unwelcome in certain regions and are often attacked.[56]

    Contrary to the impression prevalent in the West—that the conflict is between religious Muslims and “anti-religion, secular Kemalists”—the fact remains that the majority of Turks, secular included, are traditional and observant Muslims many of whom define themselves primarily as “Muslims first.”[57] While the Turkish constitution recognizes all Turkish citizens as “Turks,” the dominant sentiment in the country has always been that in order to be considered a Turk, one must be Muslim. The complete absence of any non-Muslim governor, ambassador, or military or police officer attests to the prevalence of Islam’s dominance in the Turkish establishment. Therefore, it appears Gülen is not fighting for more individual freedoms but to free Islam from the confines of the mosque and the private domain of individuals and to bring it to the public arena, to govern every aspect of life in the country.[58] AKP leaders, including Gül and Erdoğan, have repeatedly expressed their opposition to the “imprisonment of Islam in the mosque,” demanding that it be present everywhere as a lifestyle. Most Turks vividly remember statements by AKP leaders not long ago rejecting the definition of secularism as “separation of mosque and state.” Gül has slammed “secularism” on many occasions, including during a November 27, 1995 interview with The Guardian. What Turkey’s Islamists really want is to remove the founding principles of the Turkish Republic. So long as U.S. and Western officials fail to recognize that Gülen’s rhetoric of tolerance is only skin-deep, they may be setting the stage for a dialogue, albeit not of religious tolerance, but rather to find an answer to the question, “Who lost Turkey?”

    Rachel Sharon-Krespin is the director of the Turkish Media Project at the Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI), Washington D.C.

    [1] Can Dündar, Milliyet (Istanbul), June 21, 2007; Reha Muhtar, Vatan (Istanbul), June 22, 2007.
    [2] Milliyet, Mar. 10, 2008; Hürriyet (Istanbul), Mar. 10, 2008.
    [3] Helen Rose Ebaugh and Dogan Koc, “Funding Gülen-Inspired Good Works: Demonstrating and Generating Commitment to the Movement,” fgulen.com, Oct. 27, 2007.
    [4] Merdan Yanardağ, Fethullah Gülen Hareketinin Perde Arkasi, Turkiye Nasil Kusatildi? (Istanbul: yah Beyaz Yayın, 2006), based on interviews with Nurettin Veren on Kanaltürk television, June 26, July 3, 2006.
    [5] “Fethullah Gülen Is an Islamic Scholar and Peace Activist,” International Conference on Fethullah Gülen, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, Nov. 2007; J. J. Rogers, “Giants of Light: Fethullah Gülen and Meister Eckhart in Dialogue,” The University of Texas, San Antonio, Tex., Nov. 3, 2007.
    [6] See for example, Rogers, “Giants of Light”; USA Today, July 18, 2008.
    [7] Bülent Aras, “Turkish Islam’s Moderate Face,” Middle East Quarterly, Sept. 1998, pp. 23-9.
    [8] Anadolu Ajansı (Ankara), Feb. 10, 1998.
    [9] Booklets on Anatolian Sufism with citations from Mevlana Celleddin Rumi distributed at the “Muslim World in Transition: Contributions of the Gulen Movement” conference, London, Oct. 25 – 27, 2007.
    [10] Aland Mizell, “Clash of Civilizations versus Interfaith Dialogue: The Theories of Huntington and Gulen,” KurdishMedia.com, Dec. 31, 2007; idem, “Are Islam and Kemalism Compatible? How Two Systems Have Impacted the Kurdish Question?” Iraq Updates, Nov. 28, 2007.
    [11] Interview with Nurettin Veren, Kanaltürk television, June 26, 2006.
    [12] Ibid.
    [13] Sabah (Istanbul), Dec. 30, 2004.
    [14] Veren interview, Kanaltürk, June 26, 2006.
    [15] Cumhuriyet (Istanbul), Dec. 23, 2007.
    [16] Bayram Balcı, “Central Asia: Fethullah Gulen’s Missionary Schools,” Oct. 2001.
    [17] Interview with Merdan Yanardağ, Gerçek Gündem (Istanbul), Nov. 20, 2006.
    [18] Hürriyet, Apr. 11, 2008.
    [19] Erik-Jan Zürcher, “Kamermeerderheid Eist Onderzoek Naar Turkse Beweging,” NOVA documentary, July 4, 2008.
    [20] Cumhuriyet, July 9, 2008; Netherlands Information Services, July 11, 2008.
    [21] Yanardağ, Fethullah Gülen Hareketinin Perde Arkasi, Turkiye Nasil Kusatildi?
    [22] Adil Serdar Saçan, interview, Kanaltürk, July 3, 2006.
    [23] Ibid.
    [24] Samanyolu television, Oct. 13, 2008.
    [25] See, for example, Michael Rubin, “Erdogan, Ergenekon, and the Struggle for Turkey,” Mideast Monitor, Aug. 2008.
    [26] Yanardağ interview, Gerçek Gündem, Nov. 20, 2006.
    [27] Vatan, June 2, 2008; Hürriyet, June 2, 2008.
    [28] SOK! Tuggeneral Munir Erten den SOK aciklamalar!” accessed Oct. 27, 2008.
    [29] “Sok Video! Cumhuriyet Savcisi Salim Demirci,” accessed Oct. 27, 2008.
    [30] Vakit (Istanbul), June 14, 2008.
    [31] Vatan, June 2, 2008; Hürriyet, June 2, 2008.
    [32] BBC News, Feb. 4, 2008; Frank Hyland, “Investigation of Turkey’s ‘Deep State’ Ergenekon Plot Spreads to Military,” Global Terrorism Analysis, Jamestown Foundation, July 16, 2008.
    [33] Reuters, May 1, 2008; Sendika.org, Labornet Turkey, May 1, 2008; Vatan, May 1, 2, 2008; Milliyet, May 1, 2, 2008; Hürriyet, May 1, 2, 2008
    [34] Vatan, May 2, 2008; Milliyet, May 2, 2008; Hürriyet, May 2, 8, 2008.
    [35] Hürriyet, Feb. 28, 2008.
    [36] Milliyet, May 14, 2008.
    [37] Yanardağ, Fethullah Gülen Hareketinin Perde Arkasi, Turkiye Nasil Kusatildi?
    [38] Turkish Judiciary at War with AKP Government to Defend Its Independence,” MEMRI Special Dispatch No. 1520, Mar. 27, 2007.
    [39] “The AKP Government’s Attempt to Move Turkey from Secularism to Islamism (Part I): The Clash with Turkey’s Universities,” MEMRI Special Dispatch No. 1014, Nov. 1, 2005; “Professor from Van University in Turkey Commits Suicide after Five Months in Jail without Trial,” MEMRI Special Dispatch No. 1025, Nov. 18, 2005.
    [40] Zaman (Istanbul), Apr. 18, 2008.
    [41] Odatv.com, May 30, 2008; Hürriyet, June 13, 2008; Akşam (Istanbul), June 16, 2008.
    [42] Radikal (Istanbul), Apr. 7, 2008.
    [43] Hürriyet, Oct. 21, 2008.
    [44] Hürriyet, May 14, 2008.
    [45] Hürriyet, Sept. 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 2008.
    [46] Milliyet, July 14, 2008; Cumhuriyet, July 15, 2008
    [47] Turkish channel ATV, June 18, 1999.
    [48] Ibid.
    [49] Ibid.; “The Upcoming Elections in Turkey (2): The AKP’s Political Power Base,” MEMRI Inquiry and Analysis No. 375, July 19, 2007.
    [50] Sabah, Jan. 2, 3, 2005.
    [51] “Fethullah Gulen v. Michael Chertoff, Secretary, U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security, et al,” Case 2:07-cv-02148-SD, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
    [52] Ibid.
    [53] Turkish Daily News (Ankara), Mar. 16, 2008; Vakit, June 7, 9, 2008; Yeni Şafak (Istanbul), June 9, 2008.
    [54] Mustafa Akyol, “The Threat Is Secular Fundamentalism,” International Herald Tribune, May 4, 2007; “Islam Will Modernize—If Secular Fundamentalists Allow,” Turkish Daily News, May 15, 2007; “Mr. Logoglu Is Wrong, Considerably Wrong about Turkey,”Turkish Daily News, May 24, 2007.
    [55] Vatan, Aug. 21, 2008; Turkish Daily News, Sept. 23, 2008.
    [56] Hürriyet, Feb. 14, 2008; Milliyet, Feb. 14, 2008; Vatan, Feb. 14, 2008, Cumhuriyet, Feb. 14, 2008.
    [57] Yeni Şafak, July 7, 2006.
    [58] “Turkish PM Erdogan in Speech during Term as Istanbul Mayor Attacks Turkey’s Constitution, Describing It as ‘A Huge Lie’: ‘Sovereignty Belongs Unconditionally and Always To Allah’; ‘One Cannot Be a Muslim and Secular,’” MEMRI Special Dispatch No. 1596, May 23, 2007.

    Related Topics: Radical Islam, Turkey | Winter 2009 MEQ

  • THE FETHULLAH GULEN MOVEMENT Bill Park*

    THE FETHULLAH GULEN MOVEMENT Bill Park*

    THE FETHULLAH GULEN MOVEMENT

    The Gulen movement is attracting increasing and sometimes hostile attention both inside Turkey and beyond as a result of its increasing activity, wealth, and influence. Inspired by the thoughts of its founder, Sufi scholar Fethullah Gulen, it has established hundreds of educational institutions, as well as media outlets, dialogue platforms, and charities. Well-established in Turkey, it has expanded into the wider Turkic world and, increasingly, beyond. Yet its structure, ambitions, and size remain opaque, making assessment of its impact and power difficult.

    INTRODUCTION

    Recent developments have led to an upsurge of curiosity about the Turkish Sufi scholar Fethullah Gulen and his legion of followers, known as Fethullahci, both in his native country and abroad. One factor contributing to this attention was Gulen’s summer 2008 election as the world’s leading intellectual in a poll organized jointly by the British Prospect magazine and the U.S. publication Foreign Policy, in which over half a million votes were registered for a candidate who had hitherto been unknown to Prospect’s editor. Prospect‘s analysis of the poll highlighted how relatively high levels of Turkish internet use generated a specifically Turkish effect in such polls. Prospect also identified in Gulen’s victory the emergence of a new kind of intellectual, “one whose influence is expressed through a personal network, aided by the internet, rather than publications or institutions.” These observations offer a penetrating insight into the mechanisms of Gulen’s influence and the nature of the Gulen movement.

    Prospect additionally noted how votes for Gulen mounted in the wake of publicity for the poll in the Gulen-inspired Turkish newspaper Zaman and a host of other Gulen websites. This testified to the legendary “efficiency and discipline” and “organizational ability” of the Fethullahci. There is a hint of something sinister in this interpretation of Gulen’s victory, implying as it does central direction rather than spontaneity. Secular Turks share such suspicions, and conspiracy theories abound in Turkey concerning both the source and level of the movement’s funding and the nature of its ultimate ambitions. Indeed, both are obscure. It is often alleged that the Gulen movement receives funding, either alternatively or simultaneously, from the CIA, Saudi Arabia, Iran, and the Turkish state. Gulen himself has lived in somewhat hermit-like exile in Pennsylvania since 1998, ostensibly due to ill-health but also as a consequence of fears for his freedom should he return to Turkey. He was charged in 1999 for “establishing an illegal organization in order to change the secular structure of the state and to establish a state based on religious rules.” Although he was acquitted in 2006, the judgment was appealed, and it was not until June 2008 that the acquittal was finally upheld, thus clearing the way for his safe return to Turkey.

    In the West, most would probably concur with The Economist, which has noted the generally good reception received there by the Gulen movement, whose security services “have not detected any hidden ties with extremism.” On the other hand, according to the American “neo-conservative” Michael Rubin, if Gulen does return to Turkey “Istanbul 2008 may very well look like Tehran 1979.” Rubin anticipates millions turning out to greet Gulen on his return to Turkey, his issuing of fatwas (religious edicts) designed to distance Turkey from its official secularism, the restoration of the caliphate, and the subversion of the rule of law “to an imam’s conception of God.” In more measured fashion, Hakan Yavuz, a U.S.-based Turkish scholar of Islam in Turkey, has been quoted as asserting that the Gulen movement is “the most powerful movement right now in the country…. The point where they are today scares me. There is no other movement to balance them in society.” The movement’s activities abroad sometimes arouse comparable suspicions. The Russian authorities, fearful of any indications of Islamic or pan-Turkic revivalism within their borders, have recently tried to close down a Gulen school in St. Petersburg as part of a wider campaign against the movement’s activities and influences, a campaign which has included bans on the works of the Sufi teacher Said Nursi, from whom Gulen draws much of his inspiration. In light of all this, it is interesting to note that the U.S. authorities chose to reject Gulen’s application for the right of permanent residence in the United States on the grounds of his insufficient renown, a decision ruled improper by a federal judge in July 2008.

    Clearly Gulen and the Fethullahciare divisive, but they have also been described by The Economist as “one of the most powerful and best-connected of the networks that are competing to influence Muslims round the globe.” In addition to its global activism, the movement constitutes a major part of Turkey’s current social and political evolution, signified by the electoral fortunes of the ruling Justice and Development Party (Adalet ve Kalkinma Partisi, AKP), with which it overlaps. Yet it remains opaque. This article will seek to throw such light as can be thrown on the movement, and offer a critical assessment of its values, nature, and impact. It will in part draw on this author’s experiences and observations during a week spent in Istanbul in July 2008 as a guest of the Gulen-inspired and UK-based Dialogue Society (http://www.dialoguesociety.org), during which various aspects of the ideas and activities of the movement were discussed, and Gulen-inspired businessmen’s associations, media outlets, educational establishments, and the like were visited.

    GULEN’S THINKING

    One cannot understand the nature of the movement without some mention of Fethullah Gulen’s thinking. Although this has evolved towards more universalistic, pluralistic, liberal, and democratic values, in large measure it remains rooted in Turkey’s particular circumstances and experiences. For Gulen, Kemalist Turkey’s “top-down” imposition of a dogmatic secularism has distanced swathes of Turkish society from the governing elite. Gulen prefers to draw inspiration from the Ottoman model of state-society relationships. Although the empire’s rulers were guided by their faith, the Ottoman system of governance was not theocratic. Public laws were formulated on the basis of the state’s needs rather than in accordance with Islamic law (Shari’a). For Gulen, the state has a functionally secular responsibility to provide internal and external security and stability for its citizens. Gulen’s state-centrism even led him to sympathize with Turkey’s 1980 military coup, regarding it as appropriate that the state protect itself and its citizens against the chaos that was threatening to engulf Turkish society. Thus, Gulen is not in favor of the political implementation of Shari’a, though the freedom to express one’s faith should be respected. He is opposed to “political Islam,” and even sympathized with Turkey’s 1997 “post-modern coup” that removed Necmettin Erbakan’s Welfare Party from power, although Gulen was himself caught up in the crackdown on religious activity that came in its wake. He believed that Erbakan and his followers were embarked on the first steps towards an “Iranianization” of Turkish political and social life.

    Gulen believes that there is no necessary contradiction between Islam and modernity. Indeed, Turkish Islam’s more adaptable and less doctrinal Sufi traditions have enabled Turkey, with its democratization, free market economy, and secular political system, to incorporate aspects of modernity barely found elsewhere in the Muslim world. A key to his thinking is that Islam should positively embrace science, reason, democratization, and tolerance. It should not shield itself from other faiths, other ideas, or from scientific and technological progress. Gulen believes that the relative (to the West) economic and moral poverty of so much of the Islamic world is explained by its attachment to misplaced and dogmatic interpretations of Islam, not Islam per se. Indeed, he believes Turkey can lead the Islamic world toward this realization, and for all his proclaimed universalism there is also a pronounced “Turkishness” to his thinking. Turkish society is nationalistic, and some of this flavor has been absorbed by Gulen and the Fethullahci.

    For Gulen, the key to Islam’s adaptation to the modern world does not lie in direct political activity and organization. Rather, Gulen propagates a kind of “educational Islamism” as opposed to a “political Islamism.” Thus, educational curricula should emphasize science, technology, and instruction in the English language. In place of faith teaching Gulen advocates the cultivation of spiritual, moral, and behavioral values, of tolerance, respect, openness, and the like. Indeed, Gulen feels that the West has forsaken the spiritual dimension of human existence. Through the internalized spiritual transformation of individuals, a wider social transformation will evolve and, indirectly, a (re-) “Islamized” version of modernity. Thus, politics should be “Islamized” only via a bottom-up process and indirectly, in which people and state are reconnected through a shared attachment to and internalization of values. It is an approach that resembles a kind of “long march through the institutions.” In this sense, Gulen’s mission can be said to be a political project, but one that aspires to achieve its goals indirectly. People of faith as well as learning, a “Golden Generation,” should be cultivated and encouraged to dedicate their lives to the service (hizmet)of the people and to inspire them towards the movement’s objectives.

    The emphasis on spirituality in Gulen’s thinking is partly explained by his attachment to Turkey’s “folk Islam,” Sufism. Specifically, Gulen derives inspiration from the writings of the prominent Kurdish religious authority Said Nursi (1877-1961). His Nur (Light) movement was similarly distinguished by its advocacy of reason, progress, and tolerance, and its quietism towards direct political involvement. Even if Turkish Islam’s uniqueness is sometimes exaggerated, there is little doubt that its sects, saints, and eclecticism can be offensive to other Muslims, as can its “moderation.” Sufism also typically features the kind of master-disciple relationships replicated today by the inspiration Gulen provides his followers. Widespread membership of Sufi sects has long persisted in secular Turkey, generally concealed from the country’s suspicious rulers.

    Gulen has also advocated both local and global interfaith and intercivilizational dialogue, and to this end met with Pope John Paul II in Rome in 1998, and inside Turkey with Patriarch Bartholomeos, head of the Greek Orthodox Fener Patriarchate in Istanbul, the former Chief Rabbi of Turkey’s Jewish community David Aseo, as well as with numerous other high-profile Jewish and Christian figures. In its support for and sponsorship of such activities, the Gulen movement seeks both to counter the impact of the more violent fundamentalist strains in modern Islam — Gulen has repeatedly condemned terrorism as “un-Islamic”–and to undermine wherever it can Huntington’s “Clash of Civilizations” thesis. Gulen’s championing of interfaith dialogue springs in part from his recognition of the shared theological origins of Islam, Christianity, and Judaism–although in his appeal for interfaith dialogue and tolerance Gulen incorporates Buddhism and Hinduism too–and Muhammad’s injunction to respect the “people of the book.” The transcendental quality of faith is for Gulen a unifying force that outweighs theological differences. His commitment to dialogue with the Judeo-Christian world is also related to his admiration for Western modernity, liberalism, and technological and economic prowess. Gulen’s frequent and approving references to the “Global Village” express his perception that the phenomena of globalization have so bound together the fates of peoples that conflict between them serves nobody’s interests. Characteristically, he again draws upon the multifaith and multicultural example of the Ottoman Empire, which he adduces as evidence of the capacity of diverse peoples to live together harmoniously.

    The flavor of Gulen’s thinking is then distinctly moderate, and offers little credence to some of the wilder accusations against him; but what of the movement that takes his name?

    THE FETHULLAHCI

    In the wake of Gulen’s appointment as a state-employed religious preacher to Izmir in 1966, a loose network of students, teachers, professionals, businessmen, and the like began to gather around him and to coalesce as a spontaneous “social movement” inspired by Gulen’s example. Its first venture into the wider propagation of its philosophy came in the form of summer schools, from which it progressed to the establishment of teaching centers (dershane),often dormitories, to prepare religious students for university admission. These remain an important element in the inculcation of Gulen’s values, not least through a “mentoring” system found throughout the movement’s educational establishments and its wider “structure.” The dershane are also a prime source of recruits. As it blossomed, so it attracted the attention of Turkey’s secularist state establishment. Gulen himself served a seven-month spell in prison in the early 1970s for propagating religion, and again attracted uncomfortable attention both during the 1980s and, as already noted, in the late 1990s. The network did not openly blossom as a major educational, social, and religious movement until the early 1980s, when in the wake of the military coup of 1980 the space for religious activity was expanded, a policy inspired by the so-called “Turkish-Islamic synthesis.” This advocated a fusion between Turkish national identity and the Islamic faith, in the hope that a (state-managed) religiosity would offer a politically less threatening antidote to the leftism that had contributed to the social chaos of the preceding decade.

    It has been argued that “the rural and pious masses of Anatolia remained largely unaffected by the cultural re-engineering” of Kemalism, and that Turkey has remained a “torn” society a la Huntington. The wider “democratization” and opening up of social, economic, and political life in Turkey after 1983 reinforced this “center-periphery” encapsulation of Turkish politics and society. Turkey’s increased pluralism has enabled its more devout and conservative provincial hinterland to challenge the Kemalist, secular, “Westernizing” and urban center. This ideological rift has been reinforced by the ascendance of a more traditional, pious Anatolian business and professional class. The Gulen movement also profited from this post-1980 liberalization, which created a space for its media, educational, and financial activities free from the control of the statist secular establishment and which was accompanied by, and contributed to, a more general “Islamization” of Turkish public life.

    Turkey’s “new” class of businessmen, professionals, teachers, and intellectuals form the core of the Fethullahci. This middle class profile is not quite coincident with the newly-urbanized working class or the rural poor who provide the backbone of the AKP’s electoral support. Gulen followers range from extremely pious individuals–often teachers and preachers and those engaged in the movement’s dialogue activities, who are inspired by the Islamic principle of hizmet, and whose lives are dedicated to the propagation of the values and ideas of Fethullah Gulen–to the more occasional and more pragmatic sympathizers, such as businessmen, politicians, journalists, and increasingly even officials of the supposedly secular Kemalist state. Collectively, these might be regarded as Gulen’s “Golden Generation.” The movement’s pious activists are inclined towards constant and somewhat uncritical reference to Gulen’s writings. Such “true believers” can convey the impression of “cultism,” and can perhaps be likened to early Christian sects, certainly in their motivation but perhaps also in their spontaneity.

    There seems little reason to doubt the debt of the movement’s business backers to Gulen’s philosophy, the sincerity of their Islamic approach to their wider social and moral obligations, their desire to please God, and their voluntarism. Zakat is one of the five pillars of Islam, and obliges Muslims to donate 2.5 percent of their wealth to worthy causes. Sadaqa, or voluntary charity, can inspire the wealthy to donate in excess of this minimum. Many rich Gulen sympathizers do indeed donate a large percentage of their personal wealth, as expressions of their commitment. Businessmen, typically forming tightly-knit circles drawn from a particular town or locality and whose relationships rely heavily on mutual trust, donate–in money or in kind–to the building of schools and the like as acts of Islamic charity. Such “giving” might also bring a commercial return in the form of contracts or “profits” from a venture’s revenue-raising capacity, although the general principle is that ventures should be self-financing and that any surplus funds be ploughed back.

    Initially benefitting from some protective cover from Prime Minister Turgut Ozal, reckoned to be a sympathizer, the movement has since gone on to open around 200 schools in Turkey since its first was established in 1982, universities such as Fatih in Istanbul, hospitals, charities, a television channel (Samanyolu TV)–which now has plans to broadcast to the Turkish community in Germany–a radio station(Burc FM), a mass-circulation daily newspaper (Zaman)–which in addition to its online English-language edition also publishes elsewhere in the Turkic world such as Azerbaijan, Kyrgyzstan, Turkmenistan and Bashkortostan in the Russian Federation–and several other periodicals. In 1996 it established a bank, Asya Finans, operating on the basis of Islamic principles such as interest-free banking and initially tasked to raise investment funds for the newly-independent Turkic republics. Its activities are now extensive and global. The network also spawned a Journalists and Writers Foundation (http://www.gyv.org.tr/), largely to facilitate dialogue activities, and a Teachers Foundation, each of which publishes journals and organizes symposiums and conferences–frequently abroad–and provides an umbrella for a host of dialogue groups and charitable organizations.

    Cooperation between and overlapping membership of these various institutions is extensive and confusing–largely because Gulen-inspired institutions rarely own up to that fact. The websites of its schools, universities, media outlets, charities, and dialogue groups almost never directly refer to Gulen’s inspiration. To offer just a few examples, one searches in vain for any sign either of Gulen’s inspiration or of any notable religious focus on the website of the Gulen-sourced Virginia International University in the United States ), or of the Dialogue Society that hosted this author in Istanbul, or of Zaman newspaper, or of Fatih University in Istanbul ), or of the Confederation of Businessmen and Industrialists in Turkey (TUKSON) (), or of charities such as Kimse Yok Mu (). Yet all are part of the Gulen network. This explains why estimates of the number of schools and other educational institutions run by the movement can vary, thougha figure of around 500 establishments within and beyond Turkey probably represents a conservative estimate.

    Furthermore, the movement is loosely structured and decentralized, and each of its ventures are individually financed (and usually self-financing), and run on a voluntary basis by sympathizers with the network. The movement consists of numerous businessmen’s associations, education trusts, and the like–each acting independently. Nor does it have a membership as such, and Fethullahci are often loath to declare themselves openly as such. Indeed, the distinction between members, followers, sympathizers, and collaborators is blurred, and the movement is coy about revealing its scale–which it might not accurately know. As a consequence, estimates of the movement’s “membership” vary considerably. One source suggested a figure anywhere between 200,000 and four million Turks. More recently, Prospect offered a figure of five million. This “structure,” or lack of it, raises the question of whether so devolved, publicity-shy and voluntaristic a movement can exhibit the sense of purpose and discipline sometimes attributed to it, but it also adds to the suspicion with which it is regarded.

    It is an internet-connected, informal and word-of-mouth set of overlapping networks that is more social movement than organization. It fuses faith with practical activity in a way that empirical and material analysis finds hard to grasp. It is undoubtedly well-resourced, interconnected, effective, and extensive, with tentacles throughout society and sympathizers within the political and bureaucratic elite. Indeed, Gulen sympathizers can increasingly be found in government service. A Turkish interior minister once suggested that as many as 70 percent of the nation’s police force are Gulen sympathizers. This is the kind of development that aggravates Turkey’s secularists. After all, the judicial case against Gulen in the late 1990s was based on a tape in which he seemed to be urging his followers to take over the state by stealth. This chimes with the mission with which Gulen’s “Golden Generation” is tasked–to re-Islamize society from below. Overall, the impression is of a parallel structure and society that sits uneasily alongside Turkey’s officially secular state institutions and ruling elite, providing a silent, amorphous, and ungraspable challenge.

    THE GULEN MOVEMENT’S EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES

    Overt religious teaching, and even explicit mention of Fethullah Gulen, is generally absent from Gulen educational establishments, both in Turkey and abroad. This is partly explained by the need to tread carefully in the presence of political authorities suspicious of religious (or on occasion for Gulen ventures abroad, foreign) activities. It also reflects Gulen’s educational philosophy, which stresses teaching “by example” and the cultivation of “good behavior” rather than religious devotion. In any case, matters of faith can be left to extra-curricula classes and the “mentoring” system, conducted by a teaching staff invariably made up of Gulen devotees. Gulen schools everywhere abide by local curricula, and both in Turkey and abroad they are immensely popular due to the strong reputation they have acquired for the quality of their technical and scientific teaching, for their English language instruction, and the high behavioral standards they set. This is true too of Gulen schools that serve the West’s Turkish communities. As a result, fees and entrance requirements are usually high, although schemes are sometimes in place for assisting able but poorer children.

    Around half of Gulen schools are located abroad, and of those the majority are found in Turkic Central Asia and Azerbaijan, where there are also half a dozen Gulen-sponsored universities and numerous other educational, welfare, and economic institutions and activities. Indeed, the movement’s focus is on Turkic communities, including those of the Russian Federation such as Dagestan, Karachay-Cherkessia, Tatarstan, and Bashkotorstan, and other former Soviet states containing Turkic or formerly Ottoman Muslim minorities such as Ukraine, Georgia, and Moldova, and in the Balkans. One can readily see why the movement targeted Turkic Central Asia and Azerbaijan for the main thrust of its activities. After all, many in Turkey’s political class made a similar assessment of Turkish prospects in the region in the immediate aftermath of the Soviet collapse. It shares a linguistic and ethnic root with Turkey, and a “folk Islam” that, as in Turkey, incorporates numerous Sufisects and has absorbed pre-Islamic traditions, beliefs, and rituals. Furthermore, the Soviet era left behind a legacy of secular education and a commitment to science and modernity that broadly corresponds with the Gulen movement’s aspirations.

    The movement’s activities in the wider Turkic world are additionally explained by its “commitment to Gulen’s Turko-Islamic worldview.” As one observer has expressed it, “…the followers of the Gulen community aspire to reconnect Central Asians with their Turkic origins by spreading Turkish Muslim culture and morality to that region.” Even in Iraq, the Gulen schools’ pupils are usually ethnic Turkmen, although Iraq’s Turkmen are predominantly Shi’a rather than Sunni. Interestingly, Gulen has claimed that his movement was denied permission to open a school in an Azeri (Turkic) region of Iran due to Tehran’s suspicion of its pan-Turkic aspirations. Indeed, there may have been a greater receptivity to the “Turkism” of Gulen establishments located in Turkic regions rather than to their Islam. Turkish is used extensively, in addition to local languages where necessary. Furthermore, the overwhelming majority of the teachers and administrators in the movement’s institutions abroad are Turks from Turkey rather than locals, although this could change as the movement spawns indigenous Gulen devotees.

    As the movement has matured, so it appears to have shifted from its Turco-centrism to “global educational activities that encourage the national identities of the countries in which it is operating.” Today, Gulen schools and other educational establishments are globally far-flung, and can be found in locations as diverse as Russia, Armenia, the United States, Australia, China, Cambodia, sub-Saharan Africa, India, Pakistan, and in Western countries where Turkish minorities are located, notably Germany. The intake of Gulen schools is mostly, though not exclusively, aimed at local Muslim populations. Interestingly though, even in decidedly non-Turkic countries such as India and in African states, portraits of Ataturk are on show, Turkish is taught, and the Turkish national anthem sung. Again, the Turkishness of Gulen schools seems more evident than their Islamism. This emphasis on Turkish language and culture has even won over some of the usually suspicious representatives of Turkey’s secularist political class. Some Gulen schools do not even have a majority Muslim intake, and might be located in zones of interreligious strife. Thus, in the Philippines, in an area where the denominational split between Muslims and Christians is roughly half and half, a Gulen school employs many Filipino teachers (some of whom are Christian) and admits many Christian students. Furthermore, and in keeping with the movement’s commitment to interfaith dialogue, strong and healthy links are maintained with nearby Christian institutions. Even in Central Asia, non-Muslim students might be granted admission to Gulen establishments.

    INTERFAITH DIALOGUE

    Tracing the range of interfaith activities of the Gulen movement is difficult, given its devolved nature and its coy approach to self-publicity. The movement has sponsored or contributed to a confusing diversity of often overlapping interfaith organizations that operate both at the global or transnational and at the local intrasocietal level. Unsurprisingly, the Gulen movement is seen by many non-Muslims as a particularly congenial Islamic dialogue partner. Amongst the numerous U.S.-based Gulen organizations are the Institute of InterFaith Dialog ) and the InterFaith Cultural Organization (). The movement takes the credit for organizing the Inter-Civilization Dialogue Conference in 1997, and in 1998, it initiated the annual Eurasian Meetings, focusing on Central Asia and Russia. It also claims to have provided the inspiration for the European Union Organization of Islamic Conference summit in Istanbul in 2002, in the wake of the September 11 attacks. In Turkey it has brought together leaders of the three Abrahamic religious communities, and initiated dialogues with Kurds and Alevis. Its activists and offices in Turkey have been subjected to threats and violent attacks in reaction to such endeavors. Another method adopted by the movement as a means of interfaith dialogue is the so-called Iftar, or fast-breaking, meals, which bring together peoples of different faiths and communities. These enable a more low-key and localized approach to interfaith and intercommunal understanding, not least to address the more local ramifications of global interfaith tension.

    Since its formation in 2007, the Intercultural Dialogue Center (Kurturler Arasi Diyalog Merkezi, KADIM) (http://www.gyv.org.tr) has functioned as a kind of clearing house for much of the movement’s dialogue activity. It brings together a range of other dialogue platforms, such as the Abant Platform of the Journalists and Writers Foundations, the Intercultural Dialogue Platform, and the Dialogue Eurasia Platform. In its various meetings, conferences, panels, publications, and other fora, these platforms seek to propagate Gulen’s advocacy of tolerance and modernity, and bring together intellectuals, writers, activists, and others to discuss a wide range of current issues–some of them domestic. For example, early in 2007 Abant organized a panel in Turkey aimed at encouraging dialogue between the Sunni majority and the Alevi minority. The Platform’s first meeting was held in Abant in Turkey in 1998, but in 2004 it held its first annual meeting abroad, in Washington D.C., followed by Brussels and Paris. It was not until February 2007 that it held its first international meeting in the Islamic world, in Egypt.

    ASSESSMENT

    It is not possible to offer a definitive assessment of the Gulen movement’s impact, either in Turkey or abroad. Its activities are too diverse both in their content and context, too devolved, and too disguised. Furthermore, the movement is a “work-in-progress,” as it continues to evolve, expand, and influence. Much depends on the perspective one adopts. Certainly in the Turkish context, the more one perceives the movement as a more-or-less hierarchical, disciplined, and “conspiratorial” organization that seeks to penetrate and undermine the Turkish state and society from within, the more one is inclined to adopt an essentially political interpretation of the movement’s activities. This is precisely the model of the Gulen movement that many in Turkey’s elite hold, and fear. On the other hand, although the movement’s lack of transparency and the weakness of its internal democracy and capacity for self-criticism are unsettling, this does not necessarily render it an extremist phenomenon. Neither Gulen nor the movement that takes his name is overtly politicized, and in the absence of hard evidence to the contrary, the movement will seem benign to many–unless of course one is ideologically opposed to challenges to Turkey’s existing order, as many in Turkey are, or inherently uneasy about any faith-inspired movement.

    A similar inconclusiveness emerges from an analysis of the movement’s educational ventures. Although revenues raised by school fees are often used to enable access by less-privileged students, it remains an inescapable fact that the movement’s educational model is elitist. In Turkey this is contributing to the creation of a parallel and Gulen-inspired elite. In post-communist Central Asia, the main location of Gulen’s overseas educational activities, successful applicants are usually the children either of the wealthy or of government officials. This has to be appreciated against the background of a collapsed educational, social, and economic infrastructure throughout much of the region. State spending on education has plummeted throughout the region, leading to school closures, a shortage of teachers, a degradation of the physical infrastructure, and widespread corruption surrounding school and college admissions and test results. There is scope here for resentment of the “Turkish” schools. Although Gulenschools represent only around ten percent of Central Asia’s education system, it could be that–in a tacit partnership with the Turkish state–the movement’s activities will over the longer term intensify the emotive and material bonds between Turkic peoples–or their elites–and states. The Gulen network’s Central Asian elites could in time take on the forms of their Turkish counterparts, thereby encouraging the emergence of a pan-Turkic world linked by overlapping and fused identities. This could in turn ease the development of economic interactions, and even encourage closer state-to-state relationships. Such an evolution would not quite accord with the kind of “Turkish model” that Ankara’s secularists have sometimes hoped might be adopted in Central Asia, but it might dovetail with the pan-Turkic aspirations of nationalist elements in Turkey.

    However, there are indications that a shared Turkic ethnic and linguistic root might not be sufficient to remove all barriers to a fuller interpenetration. The movement’s educational establishments in the region are frequently referred to simply as “Turkish schools,” and at least initially some local inhabitants seem to have resented the speed with which Turkish institutions replaced Soviet/Russian ones after 1991. Furthermore, there have been indications of a distasteful Turkish chauvinism and “big brother” attitude toward the Turkic peoples of Central Asia. This sense of a “foreign” and intrusive penetration has occasionally combined with a dislike of the perceived missionary self-righteousness of the movement’s teachers, whose piety and dedication can grate with more secular, non-believing and frequently dispossessed Central Asians.

    In addition, the autocratic secularity of the region’s political leaderships, and their post-Soviet sensitivity to anything they perceive as external meddling, puts the Gulen movement’s reception in the Turkic world very much at the mercy of the region’s governments. During the 1990s, Uzbek President Islam Karimov cracked down on the movement’s activities in his country, including a ban on the distribution of Zaman.The movement has minimal presence there today. It is unclear whether this was a reaction to the presence in his country of a religious group that he did not control, or whether it indicated retaliation against the Turkish state’s harboring of Uzbek opposition leaders. In 2005, Turkish teaching staff at the Islamic theology school at a university in Turkmenistan was sacked by the country’s autocratic leader President Saparmurat Niazov. It seems that the Turkmen regime was becoming increasingly unhappy about both the pan-Turkic and Islamic ideology of the Gulen network in the country. Beyond former Soviet Central Asia, the Taliban regime terminated the Gulen movement’s activities in Afghanistan in the late 1990s owing to its disapproval both of its brand of Islam and of external interference in the country. Notwithstanding the movement’s non-governmental status, incidents such as these can set back Ankara’s relations with other states.

    Assessments of the movement’s educational activities in the non-Turkic world require a different approach. Although Gulen schools retain their elitism, receptivity to their “Turkishness”–the Turkish teachers, the Ataturk portraits, the learning of the Turkish language, and the singing of the Turkish anthem–will of course vary. Perhaps the movement’s activities in non-Turkic parts of the world might be likened to the work of the cultural agencies of the major globally-active Western powers such as the United States, the UK, and France. It is unlikely to do harm to Turkey’s image and interests abroad, or to the more general cause of global understanding and tolerance. On the other hand, the relative scale of the Gulen movement’s presence is so small, and Turkey’s broader military, political, technological and economic footprint in such regions so light, that it is hard to see what measurable good it might do either. Yet, again, it might be wise not to rush to judgment. After all, Turkey’s global profile and “soft power” is expanding, and the existence of well-educated individuals with a knowledge of and sympathy with Turkish culture might further facilitate it. Perhaps too the movement has matured to the point that “activism through good deeds” is enough.

    As Gulen schools host a primarily Muslim intake and its media outlets target primarily Muslim audiences, the movement’s activities feed into its global contestation over what Islam is and what role it should play. Its message could hardly be more at odds with that brand of Islam typically dubbed “fundamentalist,” notwithstanding the ire of commentators such as Rubin. Gulen’s teaching might increase Muslim receptivity to the idea of a Turkish-style fusion of modernity and Islam, and might generate local bulwarks against Islamist fundamentalism. Yet it is in precisely those regions most susceptible to fundamentalist Islamism that resistance to Gulen is at its strongest. In an apparent paradox, the Gulen movement’s slightest presence is in the neighboring Arab and Iranian Muslim worlds. This is explained by its occasionally dismissive attitude towards the practice of Islam in these countries, and by its pro-Turkic and somewhat anti-Arab attitude. General Arab mistrust of Turkey in particular, external interference in general, and suspicion of alternative forms of Islam, is in any case discouraging. Shi’i Iran’s refusal to permit the establishment of (Sunni) Gulen schools in its (Turkic) areas has also ensured that barriers to the Gulen message remain in place. Even so, overtures to the Arab and Iranian worlds occur, and may be intensifying. It appears that Gulen schools can now be found in Egypt, Jordan, Yemen, and Tunisia.

    The relative absence of interaction with the Arab and Iranian worlds leads to an observation about the movement’s global interfaith activities too. In the present atmosphere, the movement’s championing of interfaith and intercivilizational dialogue is surely welcome as an antidote to those who seem determined to prove Huntington right. However, those engaged in interfaith dialogue are preaching largely to the converted–to each other. In a battle for hearts and minds, it is requisite to engage with precisely those variants of Islam that are disproportionately to be found in those areas of the world where the Gulen movement’s footprint is at its lightest. Its venture into the Arab world, in the form of a Gulen-inspired Arabic magazine, Hira, first published in December 2005, and occasional meetings with like-minded Egyptian intellectuals, is unlikely to impress the region’s radicals. On the other hand, this is a process–not an event–that produces winners and losers. As such, it is not and may never be possible to assess definitively the impact of the Gulen movement’s transnational interfaith engagement.

    Gulen schools in the West have served to reinforce or preserve Turkish and Muslim identities otherwise vulnerable to dilution as a result of interaction with host societies, although the simultaneous commitment to accommodation to and tolerance of host country customs is strong. Whether such impulses are compatible is a moot point, of course. Overall though, the emphasis placed on integration in the Gulen’s Turkish minority schools in the West, and the contribution to intercommunal relations where Gulen schools serve divided communities, perhaps permit a more positive assessment of the contribution the movement makes to more localized interfaith and intercommunal dialogue and tolerance.

    CONCLUSION

    The Gulen movement eludes definition. Deeply Turkish, it is globally engaged. It is apolitical, yet constitutes an existential political threat to Turkey’s officially secularist order, not least through its penetration of the state’s machinery. It is opposed by the Kemalist state, yet it enhances Turkey’s “soft power,” its external trade, and its pan-Turkic links. It provides a challenge both to harsher forms of Islam and to those suspicious of any faith-based, and especially Islam-inspired, phenomena. Espousing democracy and openness, it remains secretive and publicity-shy. Spiritually based, it is extremely wealthy. It is a “cult” of sorts, yet it is becoming increasingly mainstream. More a unifying set of values than an organization perhaps, its tentacles expand relentlessly nevertheless. It may over-reach itself, but it is a “work-in-progress,” metamorphosing as it grows. Along with other faith-inspired political and social movements, it is changing Turkey’s profile and will continue to do so. Turkey’s assertively secularist elite are right to be concerned.

    *Bill Park is a Senior Lecturer in the Defence Studies Department, King’s College, London University.


    NOTES

    Quoted in Robert Tait, “Islamic Scholar Voted World’s No. 1 Thinker,” The Guardian, June 23, 2008. The poll results can be found at .

    Tom Nuttall, “How Gulen Triumphed,” Prospect,July 2008.

    For example, see “Court Documents Shed Light on CIA Illegal Operations in Central Asia Using Islam & Madrassas,” (accessed August 24, 2008).

    For details of the allegations against Gulen, see Elizabeth Ozdalga, “Redeemer or Outsider? The Gulen Community in the Civilizing Process,” The Muslim World, Vol. 95, No. 3 (July 2005), pp. 439-40.

    “Court of Appeals Clears Gulen of All Allegations,” Today’s Zaman, June 26, 2008.

    “Global Muslim Networks: How Far They Have Travelled,” The Economist, March 8, 2008.

    Michael Rubin, “Turkey’s Turning Point: Could There Be an Islamic Revolution in Turkey?” April 14, 2008, https://www.meforum.org/1882/turkeys-turning-point (accessed May 7, 2008).

    In Alexandra Hudson, “Turkish Islamic Preacher–Threat or Benefactor?” Reuters UK, May 14, 2008, (accessed August 6, 2008).

    For an analysis of the movement’s external activities, see Bill Park, “The Fethullah Gulen Movement as a Transnational Phenomenon,” in?  Muslim World in Transition: Contributions of the Gulen Movement (Leeds: Leeds Metropolitan University Press, October 2007), pp. 46-59.

    “St. Petersburg Turkish College Wins Case, Resumes Services,” Today’s Zaman, August 24, 2008; Geraldine Fagan, “Russia: Said Nursi Ban Brands Moderate Muslims as Extremist,” Forum 18,June 27, 2007, reproduced in World Wide ReligiousNews (WWRN), (accessed August 24, 2008).

    “Court Orders U.S. to Reverse Immigration Decision for Prominent Turkish Religious Leader,” International Herald Tribune, July 18, 2008.

    For comment on this, see Ahmet T. Kuru, “Changing Perspectives on Islamism and Secularism in Turkey: The Gulen Movement and the AK Party,” in Muslim World in Transition, pp. 140-51.

    Articles, speeches, interviews, etc. by Fethullah Gulen can be found at the movement’s website at . The website also reproduces online Muslim World in Transition; and Peaceful Co-Existence: Fethullah Gulen’s Initiatives in the Contemporary World (Leeds: Leeds Metropolitan University Press, November 2007). This passage represents a distillation from these sources. For further reading, also see M. Hakan Yavuz and John L. Esposito (eds.), Turkish Islam and the Secular State: The Gulen Movement (Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 2003); Robert A. Hunt and Yuksel A. Aslandogan (eds.), Muslim Citizens of the Globalized World: Contributions of the Gulen Movement (Somerset, NJ: The Light, Inc. and IID Press, 2006); The Muslim World, Vol. 95, No. 3 (July 2005): Special Issue; Islam in Contemporary Turkey: the Contributions of Fethullah Gulen, ; W. Jefferson West II, “Religion as Dissident Politics? Geopolitical Discussions Within the Recent Publications of Fethullah Gulen,” Geopolitics, Vol. 11, No. 2 (2006), pp. 280-99; Bulent Aras and Omer Caha, “Fethullah Gulen and His Liberal ‘Turkish Islam’ Movement,” Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA), Vol. 4, No. 4 (December 2000), pp. 30-42, .

    M. Hakan Yavuz, “The Gulen Movement: The Turkish Puritans,” in Yavuz and Esposito (eds.), Turkish Islam and the Secular State, p. 45.

    A term used by Bekim Agai, p. 50, in “The Gulen Movement’s Islamic Ethic of Education,” in Yavuz and Esposito (eds.), Turkish Islam and the Secular State, pp. 48-68. For Gulen’s approach to education, see also Thomas Michel, “Fethullah Gulen as Educator,” in Yavuz and Esposito (eds.), Turkish Islam and the Secular State, pp. 69-84; and Yuksel A. Aslandogan and Muhammed Cetin, “The Educational Philosophy of Gulen in Thought and Practice,” in Hunt and Aslandogan (eds.), Muslim Citizens of the Globalized World, pp. 31-54.

    For more on this, see Mustafa Gokcek , “Fethullah Gulen and Sufism: A Historical Perspective,” in Hunt and Aslandogan (eds.), Muslim Citizens of the Globalized World, pp. 165-75; Thomas Michel, “Sufism and Modernity in the Thought of Fethullah Gulen,” The Muslim World, Vol. 95, No. 3 (July 2005), pp. 341-58; Zeki Saritoprak, “Fethullah Gulen: A Sufi in His Own Way,” in Yavuz and Esposito (eds.), Turkish Islam and the Secular State, pp. 156-69; M. Hakan Yavuz, “Is There a Turkish Islam? The Emergence of Convergence and Consensus,” Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, Vol. 24, No. 2 (October 2004), pp. 213-32.

    Elizabeth Ozdalga, “The Hidden Arab: A Critical Reading of the Notion of ‘Turkish Islam’,” Middle Eastern Studies, Vol. 42, No. 4 (July 2006), pp. 551-70.

    The November 2007 Rotterdam conference proceedings offer many insights into Gulen’s thinking on this. See Peaceful Co-existence. See also Zeki Sarotoprak and Sidney Griffith, “Fethullah Gulen and the ‘People of the Book’: A Voice from Turkey for Interfaith Dialogue,” The Muslim World, Vol. 95, No. 1 (July 2005), pp. 329-40; Paul Weller, “Fethullah Gulen, Religions, Globalization and Dialogue,” in Hunt and Aslandogan (eds.), Muslim Citizens of the Globalized World, pp. 75-88.

    Richard Penaskovic, “Fethullah Gulen’s Response to the ‘Clash of Civilizations’ Thesis,” Muslim World in Transition,pp. 407-18.

    For the factors behind the movement’s emergence, see Mustafa Akyol, “What Made the Gulen Movement Possible?” Muslim World in Transition, pp. 22-32.

    Omer Taspiner, “The Old Turks’ Revolt: When Radical Secularism Endangers Democracy,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 86, No. 6 (November-December 2007), p. 118.

    This conceptualization of Turkish politics was first enunciated by Serif Mardin, “Centre-Periphery Relations: A Key to Turkish Politics?” Daedalus,Vol. 102, No. 1 (1973).

    Nilufer Narli, “The Rise of the Islamist Movement in Turkey,” MERIA, Vol. 3, No. 3, (September 1999), pp. 38-48, .

    For a consideration of the movement as a “cult,” see Muhammed Cetin, “The Gulen Movement: Its Nature and Identity,” Muslim World in Transition, pp. 377-90.

    For an insight into Gulens’ funding, see Helen Rose Ebaugh and Dogan Koc, “Funding Gulen-Inspired Good Works: Demonstrating and Generating Commitment to the Movement,” in Muslim World in Transition, pp. 539-51.

    Aras and Caha, “Fethullah Gulen and His Liberal ‘Turkish Islam’ Movement,” p. 33.

    See “A Farm Boy on the World Stage,” The Economist, March 8, 2008.

    For example, by the Wisdom school in north London, visited by this author.

    See Idris Bal, Turkey‘s Relations with the West and the Turkic Republics: The Rise and Fall of the “Turkish Model” (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2000).

    Yavuz, “The Gulen Movement: The Turkish Puritans,” pp. 39-40.

    Ibid, p. 39.

    Bema Turam, “National Loyalties and International Undertakings: The Case of the G?len Community in Kazakhstan,” in Yavuz and Esposito (eds.), Turkish Islam and the Secular State, p. 187.

    Bayram Balci, “Fethullah Gulen’s Missionary Schools in Central Asia and Their Role in the Spreading of Turkism and Islam,” Religion, State & Society,Vol. 31, No. 2 (2003), p. 156.

    Hasan Kosebalaban, “The Making of Enemy and Friend: Fethullah Gulen’s National Security Identity,” in Yavuz and Esposito (eds.), Turkish Islam and the Secular State, pp. 179-80.

    Balci, “Fethullah Gulen’s Missionary Schools,” p. 153; Bema Turam, “A Bargain Between the Secular State and Turkish Islam: Politics of Ethnicity in Central Asia,” Nations and Nationalism, Vol. 10, No. 3 (2004), pp. 353-74.

    Bayram Balci, “Central Asia: Fethullah Gulen’s Missionary Schools,” ISIM Newsletter, Vol. 9, No. 2, April 11, 2003, (accessed March 19, 2007).

    Agai, “The Gulen Movement’s Islamic Ethic of Education,” p. 63.

    “CHP Deputies: Turkish Schools Abroad Are a Source of Pride,” Today’s Zaman, March 21, 2007.

    Michel,”Fethullah Gulen as Educator,” pp. 69-84.

    Kosebalaban,”The Making of Enemy and Friend,” pp. 181-82.

    For a consideration of the Singaporean example, see Muhammad Nawab Osman, “Gulen’s Contribution to a Moderate Islam in Southeast Asia,” in Muslim World in Transition, pp. 334-46.

    Balci, “Fethullah Gulen’s Missionary Schools,” pp. 164-65;Kevin Miller Jr., “Islam in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan: The Nurcu Movement,” The Eurasian World, December 23 2003, (accessed March 19, 2007).

    Iveta Silova, Mark S. Johnson, and Stephen P. Heyneman, “Education and the Crisis of Social Cohesion in Azerbaijan and Central Asia,” Comparative Education Review, Vol. 51, No. 2 (May 2007), pp. 159-80.

    Jean-Christophe Peuch, “Turkey: Fethullahci Schools–A Greenhouse for Central Asian Elites?” June 8, 2004, (accessed March 19 2007).

    Balci, “Fethullah Gulen’s Missionary Schools,” pp. 166-67.

    Peuch, “Turkey.”

    Miller, “Islam in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan.”

    Aras and Caha, “Fethullah Gulen and His Liberal ‘Turkish Islam’ Movement,” p. 28; Balci, “Fethullah Gulen’s Missionary Schools,” pp. 155-57;Peuch, “Turkey.”

    Institute for War and Peace Reporting, London, “Clampdown on Islamic Teaching in Turkmenistan,” Reporting Central Asia, No. 401, August 4, 2005.

    Ahmet T. Kuru, “Globalization and Diversification of Islamic Movements: Three Turkish Cases,” Political Science Quarterly,Vol. 120, No. 2 (2005), p. 262.

    Elizabeth Ozdalga, “Secularizing Trends in Fethullah Gulen’s Movement: Impasse or Opportunity for Further Renewal?” Critical Middle Eastern Studies, Vol. 12, No. 1 (Spring 2003), pp. 61-73.

    Rubin, “Turkey’s Turning Point.” For globally competing approaches to Islam, see Joshua D. Hendrick, “The Regulated Potential of Kinetic Islam: Antitheses in Global Islamic Activism,” pp. 11-29, in Hunt and Aslandogan (eds.), Muslim Citizens of the Globalized World. For an account of the difficulties encountered by Gulen schools in less “moderate” Pakistan, see Sabrina Tavernise, “Turkish Schools Offer Pakistan a Gentler Vision of Islam,” New York Times, May 4, 2008.

    West, “Religion as Dissident Politics?” p. 292.

    For an account of the Gulen movement’s difficulties elsewhere in the Muslim world, see Ozcan Keles, “Promoting Human Rights Values in the Muslim World: Towards an Inclusive Civilization in Gulen’s Thought and Practice,” Muslim World in Transition,pp. 447-70.

    For more on Hira, see Paul L. Heck, “Turkish in the Language of the Qur’an: Hira,” Muslim World in Transition,pp. 643-49.

    Unal Bilir, “‘Turkey-Islam’: Recipe for Success or Hindrance to the Integration of the Turkish Diaspora Community in Germany?” Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, Vol. 24, No. 2 (October 2004), pp. 259-83. Jill Irvine, “The Gulen Movement and Turkish Integration in Germany” in Hunt and Aslandogan (eds.), Muslim Citizens of the Globalized World, pp. 55-74.


    MERIA Journal Staff
    Publisher and Editor: Prof. Barry Rubin
    Assistant Editors: Yeru Aharoni, Anna Melman.
    Webmaster: Tsadok Moshe Blok
    MERIA is a project of the Global Research in International Affairs
    GLORIA) Center, Interdisciplinary University.
    Site: http://www.gloriacenter.org – Email: info@gloriacenter.org

     

    MERIA is indexed in Index Islamicus and CSA Worldwide Political Science Abstracts. ISSN: 1565-8996.
    *Serving Readers Throughout the Middle East and in 100 Countries*
    All material: Copyright MERIA Journal.
    You must credit if quoting and ask permission to reprint.

     

     
  • Fethullah Gulen and Tourism in “Secular” Turkey: From Alcohol Free to Kaffir Free?

    Fethullah Gulen and Tourism in “Secular” Turkey: From Alcohol Free to Kaffir Free?

    – Andrew Bostom – –

    Fethullah Gulen: Facilitating His Own “Ecumenical Brand” of Alcohol and Kaffir-Free Tourism, the Useful Idiots for Cultural Jihadism at [2] Foreign Policy Notwithstanding?

     As [3] MEMRI’s Turkish blog reports (from August 26, 2008), the “fast disappearance” of restaurants in the important mountain resort of Uludag, is now being followed by another demand of Arab Muslim tourists to the region: the reduction of the number of passengers per cable car from 40, to a maximum of 25. Safety concerns, perhaps? Hardly! Arab Muslim tourists are insisting (via their travel agents) that they not be placed in too close proximity to “foreigners,” i.e., non-Muslim kaffirs /infidels, lest they have “…any bodily contact with their women and girls.” To accommodate their Arab clients’ anti-infidel bigotry, the Turkish AKP governed Bursa municipality has begun to impose these changes, extending a cable car line to the area of the hotels, and also declaring that this new line will include both “VIP” and sex-segregated (read Islamic sexual apartheid) cars as well.

     

    Not surprisingly, a company affiliated with the “ecumenist” and, according to the feckless journal Foreign Policy, “[2] World’s Top Public Intellectual,” Fethullah Gulen—in reality [4] Mr. Gulen is a cultural jihadist par excellence—has been offered a non-competitive bid to complete the Islamic supremacist /apartheid cable car line.

     

    Last July, a summary report also by MEMRI noted that,

     

    In 1999, footage was aired on Turkish television of sermons delivered by Fethullah Gulen to a crowd of followers, in which he revealed his aspirations for an Islamist Turkey ruled by shari’a as well as the methods that should be used to attain that goal. In the sermons, he said:

     

    “You must move in the arteries of the system, without anyone noticing your existence, until you reach all the power centers… until the conditions are ripe, they [the followers] must continue like this. If they do something prematurely, the world will crush our heads, and Muslims will suffer everywhere, like in the tragedies in Algeria, like in 1982 [in] Syria… like in the yearly disasters and tragedies in Egypt. The time is not yet right. You must wait for the time when you are complete, and conditions are ripe, until we can shoulder the entire world and carry it… You must wait until such time as you have gotten all the state power, until you have brought to your side all the power of the constitutional institutions in Turkey… Until that time, any step taken would be too early – like breaking an egg without waiting the full 40 days for it to hatch. It would be like killing the chick inside. The work to be done is [in] confronting the world. Now, I have expressed my feelings and thoughts to you all – in confidence… trusting your loyalty and sensitivity to secrecy. I know that when you leave here – [just] as you discard your empty juice boxes, you must discard the thoughts and feelings expressed here.”

     

    The sermon continues: “When everything was closed and all doors were locked, our houses of isik [light] assumed a mission greater than that of older times. In the past, some of the duties of these houses were carried out by madrassas, some by schools, some by tekkes [Islamist lodges]… These homes had to be schools, had to be madrassas, [had to be] tekkes all at the same time. The permission did not come from the state, or the state’s laws, or the people who govern us. The permission was given by Allah… who wanted His name learned and talked about, studied, and discussed in those houses, as it used to be in the mosques.”

     

    In another sermon, he said: “Now it is a painful spring that we live in. A nation is being born again. A nation of millions [is] being born – one that will live for long centuries, Allah willing… It is being born with its own culture, its own civilization. If giving birth to one person is so painful, the birth of millions cannot be pain-free. Naturally we will suffer pain. It won’t be easy for a nation that has accepted atheism, has accepted materialism, a nation accustomed to running away from itself, to come back riding on its horse. It will not be easy, but it is worth all our suffering and the sacrifices.”

     

    In yet another sermon, he said, “The philosophy of our service is that we open a house somewhere and, with the patience of a spider, we lay our web, to wait for people to get caught in the web; and we teach those who do. We don’t lay the web to eat or consume them, but to show them the way to their resurrection, to blow life into their dead bodies and souls, to give them a life.”

     

    By the time this was aired, Gulen had already left the country for the U.S., supposedly for health reasons. A year later, in 2000, he was indicted in absentia for attempting to change Turkey’s system of government and for “forming an illegal organization with the purpose of establishing an Islamist state.”

     

    Gulen is clearly succeeding in absentia, the useful idiots for cultural jihadsm at Foreign Policy, notwithstanding.

    All Articles Copyright © 2007-2008 Dr. Andrew Bostom | All Rights Reserved


    Article printed from Andrew Bostom:  

    URL to article:

  • GÜLEN, KÜÇÜK, AND THE EDUCATION OF SOUTH KURDISTAN

    GÜLEN, KÜÇÜK, AND THE EDUCATION OF SOUTH KURDISTAN

    Asagidaki yazi Kurt kokenli bir siteden, ilginc aciklamalar var..
    MeltemB
     

    Saturday, August 23, 2008

     

    “Gulen gave a new decree and a new kind of mobilization to assimilate Kurds and to steal their minds by injecting religious ideology and by causing them to sell their birthright.”
    ~ Aland Mizell.

    At the beginning of the month, I posted some news about the Ergenekon gang that had been published in Taraf. At the time, I mentioned that the nexus of the Ergenekon indictment could be found in a weirdo named Tuncay Güney:

    It would appear, however, that the lies surrounding the issue of “The Antidote” stem from Tuncay Güney, a one-time, small-time journalist in whose possession the original Ergenekon documents were found in 2001. Güney has been linked to Fethullah Gülen and Gülen’s Samanyolu TV. Güney claims to have brought the photos of Öcalan and Perinçek to MİT. He claims to have taken a bribe of $15,000 to PKK in order not to shut down Gülen’s schools in Hewler, although how PKK would have had any control over anything in Hewler is a huge question. Perhaps the KDP took the bribe by introducing themselves as PKK members? Güney also claıms to have delivered money from Fethullah Gülen to ultra-fascist Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu so that he could establish the BBP. 

    Zaman has some additional weird tidbits about Güney:

    “Meanwhile, in an interview with the Yeni Şafak daily, Tuncay Güney, a former journalist whose ties with various secret services, both domestic and international, have been documented, stated that Kurdish separatist terrorism would come to an end if the Ergenekon gang wanted that to happen. Güney, who now lives in Canada and works as a rabbi, has suspected ties to the group. Güney came to prominence when the first documents related to the Ergenekon gang were seized on his computer in a 2001 police raid.

    “Güney, currently a rabbi at the Jacobs House Jewish Community Center in Toronto, praised Ergenekon prosecutor Zekeriya Öz for having “done a great job” so far in the investigation, although he expressed doubts that the operation would be very successful in the end. “However, they are very close to the end and I think it is very difficult moving on further from this point. There is no power in Turkey that can stop Ergenekon,” he said, expressing doubts that the investigation will bring about the collapse of the crime group.”

    A check of YouTube reveals that Güney does, in fact, appear to be a member of an Orthodox Jewish community in Toronto, although he now denies any connection with Fethullah Gülen, as his appearance on Mehmet Ali Birand’s 32. Gün indicates. If the first Ergenekon documents were found in Güney’s possession, why has he not been indicted? Did he cut a deal and, if so, what kind of deal was it? Is his life now, in an Orthodox Jewish community in Toronto some kind of strange “witness protection” program?

    Now, there’s more from Güney on the connectıon between the Ergenekon gang, Fethullah Gülen, and Gülen’s schools in South Kurdistan, from Milliyet:
    Küçük knows Gülen for a long time 

    Güney, in his statement in 2001, claims that he and Mehmet Demircan, an important name in Fethullah Gülen’s movement, spent intense efforts to gain Küçük into the movement and that the two [Gülen and Küçük] knew each other for a long time.

    Tuncay Güney’s statement in 2001, which he gave to Istanbul police, is one of the most fundamental pieces of evidence that Ergenekon prosecutor Zekeriya Öz, is working on. In this statement, Tuncay Güney gave a detailed explanation of Fethullah Gülen’s movement. In the Ergenekon indictment’s 442nd file, there are interesting claims that Güney made. Here, Güney claims that, since the 1970s, Fethullah Gülen knew retired Brigadier General Veli Küçük, who is under arrest in the Ergenekon case, from the right-wing National Struggle Movement (MMH). Güney explained that he learned that Küçük and Fethullah Gülen knew each other for a long time, while he and one of Gülen’s prominent members, Mehmet Demircan, made efforts to gain Küçük to the movement.

    “All of them are strugglers for nationalism”

    When Tuncay Güney was detained in 2001 for by Istanbul police for fraud, he was working for Samanyolu TV, which is linked to the Fethullah Gülen movement. In the statement he gave to police while under interrogation, he pointed out that taking advantage of his position, he had the possibility to meet with important names in Fethullah Gülen’s movement.

    Within this framework, Güney mentions that he and Demircan tried to gain, the then active duty Veli Küçük, for the movement. “When we gain him, we will be more powerful in the eyes of Fethullah Gülen,” Güney says.

    Again, referring to Demircan, Tuncay Güney ascribed the information that Gülen knew Veli Küçük from the National Strugglers’ Movement. “Look at all of Fethullah Gülen’s members; they are all National Strugglers,” he said.

    Support for Gülen’s schools

    In his statement, Güney said that Veli Küçük helped Fethullah Gülen to open a school in Northern Iraq [South Kurdistan]. According to Güney’s statement, they had stopped in Diyarbakır, where they were on the way to Erbil, in order to open private Irbil Light College. There (in Diyarbakır), they called Veli Küçük to let him know they were there, thus Jandarma Regional Commander Eşref Hatipoğlu met them. Hatipoğlu sent Güney and Gülen’s members to Silopi in a military helicopter. From there, the group passed to Nehciban (there he means Neçirvan) and talked to Barzani and Talabani.

    “Veli Küçük’s teacher collared Erdoğan”

    Güney also made a statement about field officer Necabettin Ergenekon’s involvement with Gülen’s movement. According to Güney, Necabettin Ergenekon was Küçük’s teacher. According to Güney’s claims, Necabettin Ergenekon had talks with R. Tayyip Erdoğan, then the Refah Partisi (RP) Istanbul chairman. In one of these talks, Ergenekon caught Erdoğan by the collar and shook him. According to Guney’s statement, Erdoğan, in RP’s Tepebaşı office, was having a discussion with Necabettin Ergenekon about pan-Islamism. Then Ergenekon became nervous and grabbed Erdoğan by the collar saying, “This is bullshit, Tayyip; there won’t be pan-Islamism if there isn’t Turkism.”

    Güney said that the person who introduced him to Veli Küçük, was Veli Küçük’s teacher, Ergenekon. “The field officer in Izmit (Veli Küçük), is my student. I’ll take you and introduce you to him” said Ergenekon according to Güney.

    It was claimed that Küçük had named the Ergenekon organization after his teacher’s last name.

    He spied for Eymür about Gülen

    In his statement, Güney said that when he was in Fethullah Gülen’s movement, he was regularly informing MİT chairman Mehmet Eymür’s staff. Güney said, “When I was working there, Mehmet Eymür’s men would come and get information periodically . . . Besides this information, they were asking about the hot issues in the movement anyway.”

    In February, as war preparations against South Kurdistan were underway, Nêçîrvan Barzanî and the KRG gave the go-ahead for the foundation of a new Gülen university in Hewlêr. 

    There was no mention of anyone having given PKK a $15,000 bribe in connection with this Gülen enterprise, but that may be because any bribes would actually be given to the cehş of the KRG who are only too happy to contribute to the destruction of the Kurdish people for a price.

  • FETULLAH GÜLEN DOSYASI

    FETULLAH GÜLEN DOSYASI

    Yazar Milli Çözüm Araştırma Ekibi   

    Fetullah Gülen; Risale-i Nur gibi, ilmi ve imani eserleri okuyup anlamak, çevresine ve cemaatine aktarıp açıklamak üzere giriştiği gayret ve hizmetlerle tanındı ve öne çıktı. İslam’i ve insani özelliklerle bezenmiş, milli ve manevi değerleri benimsemiş, hayırlı ve yararlı bir gençlik yetiştirme yolunda, yurt ve dershane faaliyetlerini, kurs-burs hizmetlerini giderek yoğunlaştırdı.
    1970’lerin ortalarında, Milli Görüş istikametinde hizmet gören Ak-Evler hareketinden koparılarak “AKYAZILI” Vakfı kurdurulan Fetullah Gülen, giderek Bediüzzaman’ın çizgisinden uzaklaşarak masonik merkezlere yaklaştı. Dünya’ya hükmeden ve çok gizli ve de kirli işler çeviren siyonist mahfillerle; Pek karmaşık ve karanlık ilişkiler ağına takıldı.

    Hiçbir resmi sıfat ve statüsü bulunmayan, yüksek öğrenim bile yapmayan sade ve samimi bir hoca efendinin değil, bakanların ve başkanların bile erişemediği uluslar arası bir protokol pozisyonuyla; Papayla programlara… Politikacılarla pazarlıklara başlamıştı.

    İlk bakışta: Hiçbir resmi etiketi ve dini temsil yetkisi bulunmadan, şahsi gayret ve marifetiyle (hatta bazılarına göre özel velayet ve kerametiyle) bu denli yaygın bir organizeye ve saygın bir otoriteye eriştiği sanılsa… Daha doğrusu malum merkezlerce böyle sunulsa da; aslında O, “küresel çete”nin ve siyonist sömürücü sermayenin, artık sadece bir maşasıydı… Kahraman rolü oynatılan bir figürandı. Ve O’nun patron değil, piyon olduğu, sonunda zan ve tahminlerle değil, resmi belgeler ve şahitlerle ortaya çıkmıştı.

    İşte Amerika’daki siyonist yahudi stratejisti ve CIA Ortadoğu şefi Graham E. Fuller Fetullah Gülen’e bunun için sahip çıkmakta ve O’nu yere göğe sığdıramamaktaydı.

    Bu hareket, halen Fethullah Gülen’in. liderlik ettiği en geniş ve en etkili kanadın adına izafeten çoğun­lukla Gülen hareketi veya Fethullahçılar (Fethullah takipçileri) olarak anılmaktadır. Nur hareketi yetmiş yıldan fazla bir süredir sahnededir, şu anda Türkiye’deki en geniş organize dini hareket­tir, dünyada da en genişlerinden biridir. Gülen özellikle hareke­tin enerjisinin büyük bir kısmını, niteliği itibariyle hemen hemen evrenselci ye geniş manevi Öğretilere dayalı olarak İslama modernist bir bakışta yaklaşacak okulların açılması ve çalışma gruplarının kurulması da dahil, eğitimle ilgili çabalara yönelt­mektedir. Eğitim üzerindeki bu odaklanma hareketin, bilim ve teknoloji dahil bütün alanlarda eğitim ve bilginin dinle asla çelişmeyeceği, olsa olsa Allah’ın varlığı inancına ve kainatın var ediliş amacının anlaşılmasına hizmet edeceği inancını yansıtmaktadır. Hareket toplumda daha yüksek bir manevi bilinç düzeyi oluşturmaya, böylelikle zaman içinde daha aydınlanmış bir yönetişime Önayak olmaya gayret etmektedir. Klasik Şeriat, hareketin düşüncesinde merkezi bir rol oynamaz; esasen Şeriat, geniş anlamda, Allah’ın engin muradının yerine getirilebilmesi için yürünecek “yol” (Şeriatın kelime anlamı) olarak anlaşılmaktadır. Nur üyele­ri yerçekimi yasasını bile, Örneğin, Şeriatın unsurlarından biri olarak tarif ederler. Hareket İslâmi metinlerde, onların literal emirleri içinde değil de orijinal uygulamaları çerçevesinde, bugünün yeni çerçeveleri ışığında yorumlanarak anlaşılmasını sağ­lamak üzere, ciddi oranda içtihad (yorum) yoluna başvurur. Bu anlamda da hareketin görünümü son derece modernisttir.

    Nur hareketi görüşlerinde rasyonalisttir ve çoğulcu bir top­lum içinde Allah’ın yarattıklarının görkemli çok yüzlü düzenini ifade eden bütün öteki dini (hatta dini olmayan) görüşlere karşı hoşgörülü olmaya büyük önem verir. Allah’a giden yolda bilgiye yaptığı vurgu doğrultusunda, Nur hareketinin Türkiye’de 236 ilk ve ortaokul, özellikle eski Sovyet blokuna dahil ülkelerde olmak üzere dışarıda 280 okul açmış olduğu, buralarda ingilizce ve Türkçe kaliteli seküler eğitim verildiği bildirilmektedir. 200 dolayında dini vakıf ve 211 ticari şirket bu faaliyetleri finansal olarak desteklemektedir.

    Her ne kadar Nurcuların bir siyasal parti kurma niyetleri yok­sa da, hareketin liderleri anahtar meselelerde nasıl oy kullanmak gerektiği konusunda milyonları bulan takipçilerine bağlayıcı olmayan tavsiyelerde bulunmaktadır. Üyeleri birçok farklı geleneksel Türk siyasi partilerinde, İslamcı partilerde ancak çok hafif olmak üzere temsil edilmişlerdir. Nur hareketinin bütün apolitik niteliğine rağmen, Türkiye’nin radikal laikçileri, özellikle askeri liderler, Nur hareketini, sahip olduğunu iddia ettikleri uzun dö­nemli, dini aktivistleri devlete sızdırmak ve sonunda devleti ele geçirmek niyeti açısından yıkıcı ve hatta tehlikeli olarak görmek­tedirler. Tam da Nurcuların savunduğu şeyden korkuyorlar -in­sanların kalplerini değiştirmek suretiyle toplumun aşağıdan yukarıya tedricen İslâmileştirilmesi. Bunun sonucu olarak, Nurcu­lar düzenli bir şekilde ordudan ve devlet kurumlarından tasfiye edilmekte, hareket ve kurumları taciz edilmekte ve mahkemeler­de yargılanmaktadır.[1]
    Katıksız ve amansız şeriat düşmanı Bülent Ecevit’in bile Fetullah Gülen’e övgüler dizmesinin ve Fetullahçıları partisinden aday gösterip Milletvekili seçtirmesinin arkasında, acaba ne gibi hedefler yatmaktaydı.

    Milli Görüşten ve Erbakan gerçeğinden uykuları kaçan Bilderberg’ci Ecevit’lerin ve Graham Fuller’lerin Fetullah Gülen’i ve O’nun siyasi temsilcisi AKP’yi böylesine sahiplenmeleri acaba hangi hikmetlere dayanmaktaydı?

    “Türkiye demokratikleştikçe (Fetullah Gülen’in ve AKP’nin benimsediği ve Amerika’nın desteklediği) İslam’ın, Türklerin hayatında daha önemli bir konuma “geri dönmesi” kaçınılmazdı.” Diyen Graham Fuller böylece ağzındaki baklayı da kafasındaki şeytanlığı da açığa vurmaktaydı.[2]
    Rusya Fetullah Gülen okullarını kapatıyor:

    Rusya yönetimi, ülke içindeki Fethullah Gülen okullarını kapatmak için harekete geçti. Gülen’e bağlı çeşitli şirketleri yakın takip altına alan Rus yönetimi, okulları “Amerikan ve İngiliz casusu yetiştirme merkezi” olarak görüyor. Rusya yerel yöneticileri arasında bu okullarda okumuş bazı görevlilerin de işine son verilmesi için hazırlıklar yapılıyor.

    Rusya Federasyonu, Fethul­lah Gülen okullarını kapatmaya başladı. Ulaşan bil­giye göre, Rusya Federasyonu yö­netimi Fethullah Gülen okullarını açan şirketleri yakın takibe aldı. Söz konusu operasyonun, Fethul­lah tarikatının okullarına ve şir­ketlerine karşı zaman zaman yapı­lan soruşturmaların en kapsamlısı olacağı açıklandı.

    Öte yandan, Rusya Federasyo­nu: yerel yöneticileri arasında bu okullarda okumuş bazı görevlile­rin de işine son verilmesi için hazırlıklar yapıldığını hatırlattı.

    Rus yetkililer, Fethullah Gülen okullarını açıkça “Amerikan ve İngiliz casusu yetiştirme merkezi” olarak tanımladı. Öte yandan, Türkiye kamuoyuna “modern okullar” olarak sunulan bu okullardan bazılarında çok sinsi ve siyasi faaliyetler yapıldığı ve ABD’nin dünya hakimiyeti için beyinlerin yıkandığı özellikle vurgulandı.

    Moskova’da yayımlanan Nezavisimaya gazetesi, Haziran 2000’de Fethullah Gülen’in Rusya’daki taraftarlarının iktidar organlarına sızdığını yazdı.

    Söz konusu okulların önce Rusya’nın Türkçe konuşan bölgelerinde kurulduğunu bildiren Nezavisimaya, Tataristan’da 8, Başkırdistan’da 4, Karaçay-Çerkez, Çuvaşya ve Yakut-Saha’da da birer okul bulunduğunu açıkladı.

    Gazetedeki yazıda, okullarda “Amerikan hayranlığı ve İsrail propagandası” yapıldığı belirtilerek, bu kuruluşların denetlenmesini istedi.

    FSB: CASUSLUK YAPIYORLAR

    Rusya iç Güvenlik Örgütü FSB Başkanı Nikolay Patruşev, 17 Aralık 2002’de Türk basınında yer an açıklamasında, gerçekleştirdikleri en başarılı etkinlikler arasında Türk casusların deşifre edilmesini de saydı. FSB Başkanı 2002 yılı etkinlik raporunda Fethullah Gülen okullarında çalışan öğret­enlerin casusluk faaliyetlerinin deşifre edildiğini belirtti. FSB Baş­ını, açıklamasında, okulların sahibi konumundaki Tolerans, Serhat ve Ufuk vakıflarının isimlerini verdi.

    Rusya’nın Başkırdistan Özerk Cumhuriyeti’nde Fethullah Gülen okullarındaki 10 öğretmen Hazi­ran 2003’te sınır dışı edildi. Ayrıca Başkırdistan Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı’nın sınır dışı edilen öğretmenle­rin görev yaptığı okulu kuran “Ser­hat” vakfı ile tüm anlaşmalarını ip­tal ettiği de belirtildi. Bu olaydan sonra, Buryatya Cumhuriyeti’nde de, Fetullah Gülen okulu hakkında soruşturma başlatıldı.

    Milliyet gazetesi Moskova mu­habiri Cenk Başlamış, 7 Eylül 2003 tarihli haberinde, Rusya’da Fethullah Gülen okullarının tem­silcisi konumundaki Tolerans Vak­fı Başkanı Mustafa Kemal Şirin’in sınır dışı edildiğini duyurdu. Haber şöyle: “Şirin, hafta içinde Rus ha­vayolları Aeroflot’a ait bir uçakla geldiği Şeremetyova-2 Havaalanı’ndan giriş yapmak istedi, ancak pasaport kontrolü sırasında “Rus­ya’ya girişi yasak olduğu” gerekçe­siyle ülkeye girişine izin verilmedi. Yasaları çiğnediği gerekçesiyle Rusya’ya girişi 5 yıl yasaklanan Şi­rin, geceyi havaalanında geçirip, ertesi gün Türkiye’ye gönderildi. Tolerans Vakfı Başkanı Şirin, Rusya’nın Türk okullarıyla bağlantılı olarak şimdiye kadar sınır dışı etti­ği en üst düzeydeki temsilci.”

    Yine aynı haberde Rusya Fede­ral Güvenlik Servisi FSB’nin Baş­kanı Nikolay Patruşev’in yaptığı açıklamanın ardından, Rusya Eği­tim Bakanlığı’nın Fethullah Gülen okullarına karşı kapsamlı bir so­ruşturma başlattığı belirtiliyor. Bu çerçevede Rusya’nın değişik bölge­lerinde 10’a yakın okul kapatılır­ken, 50’den fazla Türk vatandaşı sınır dışı edildi.[3]
    NERDEN NEREYE?

    Bediüzzaman’ın Kur’andan kaynaklanan Risale-i Nur denilen imani ve ahlaki eserlerini okumak, okutmak ve böylece şuurlu ve huzurlu bir neslin yetişmesine katkıda bulunmak gibi hayırlı bir amaçla girişilen hizmetler, zamanla çığırından çıkmaya başladı.

    “Bediüzzaman’ın müjdelediği ve gelişine ön hazırlık ön hazırlık hizmetleri verdiği Hz. Mehdi” havasıyla kendisini merkez alan yeni bir yapılanmaya “Işık evleri”nde beyinleri bu doğrultuda yıkanan talebelerden bir çekirdek kadro oluşturulmaya ve masonik odaklar ve marazlı medya tarafından. “bu gelişmelerden kaygı duyuyorlarmış” görüntüsüyle sürekli gündemde tutulup reklâmı yapılmaya uğraşıldı.

    Fetullah Gülen’in:

    “Bu evlerin eğitim dizgesinden geçmeyenler, insanlık özünden yoksun bulunmaktadır… Işık evleri, yüreği pek, imanı çelik insanların yetiştiği kutsal mekânlardır.”[4] Şeklinde tarif ettiği bu evleri Rotary Külüplerin desteği de anlamlıydı…

    Fetullah Gülen, ışık evlerinde yetişmeyenleri, “insanlık özünden yoksun saymaktaydı.” Yani kendisine tabii olmayanlar değil, Müslümanlık, insanlık onuruna bile ulaşamazdı!?..

    Oysa Nevval Sevindi’nin Amerika’dan yolladığı ve 22 Temmuz 1997 tarihli Yeni Yüzyıl gazetesinin 5. sayfada yayınladığı “Fetullah Gülen’le Newyork sohbeti” yazısına göre:

    “Fetullah Gülen Hoca Efendi Cumhuriyet ideolojisinin yaratmak istediği “Müslüman Avrupalı Türk” tipinin mimarıydı… “Dini bütün ve Batı formasyonlu yeni bir sentez” ustasıydı?!..

    Bu tespit doğruydu… Evet dış güçlerce Fetullah Gülen’e biçilen misyon: Batı ile uyumlu ve uyuşuk layt müslüman tipi oluşturmaktı. Bu tip; Allah’ın istediği değil, Avrupa ve Amerika’nın benimsediği bir müslümandı… Ama şu gerçeği de hatırlatalım ki: Bu türlü girişimler, haliyle bazı tahribatlar yapacaklardı… Ancak asla amaçlarına ulaşamayacaklar ve başarılı olamayacaklardı. Çünkü İslam’ı istismar girişimlerinin hepsinden sonunda İslam kârlı çıkacaktı. Fetullah Gülen’in perde arkasını sezen samimiyet ve istikamet sahibi insanların da, bu sinsi ve siyonist kuşatmayı kırmaları yakındır…

    Şu soru mutlaka sorulmalı doğru ve doyurucu cevabı herhalde bulunmalıdır:

    Bir zamanlar: “Amerika ve Rusya sistem olarak materyalist felsefeyi benimsemiştir. Aslında ne Rusya’nın ne de Amerika’nın bize bakış açıları farklı değildir.

    Hatta hiçbir fark yoktur, denilebilir. Israrla söylüyoruz ki, ikisi de bizim aman vermez düşmanımızdır.”[5] Diyen Fetullah Gülen’e ne oldu ki şimdi:

    “Amerika, hala bu dünya gemisinin dümeninde oturan bir milletin adıdır… Amerika şu anda: Bütün konum ve gücüyle, bütün dünyaya kumanda edebilir ve buna layıktır.”[6] Demeye ve Amerika’yı övmeye başlamıştır?

    Fetullah Gülen’in asıl amacı; İslam’ı yaymak mı, yoksa siyonist Gizli Dünya Devleti’nin kovboyu olan Amerika’ya uyumlu ve ılımlı vatandaş hazırlamak mıdır?

    Prof. Alpaslan Işıklı’nın tespitiyle, “yurt dışındaki okullarıyla, Türkiye deki vakıf, dershane, üniversite çalışmalarıyla siyonist emperyalizmin dünya hakimiyetine ve küresel bir totalitarizmin kurulma hedefine hizmet mi yapılmakta dır?[7]
    Daha önceleri: “sebeplere riayet, bir sorumluluk olsa da; onlara tesiri hakiki vermek apaçık bir dalalet ve inhiraf (sapıklık)tır.”

    “Köpek, kendisini besleyeni sahibi olduğunu sanır ve bu yüzden sahibine gösterdiği sadakat görünüşe, yani nedenselliği dayanır.”[8] Diyen Fetullah Gülen, şimdi nasıl oluyor da:

       “Amerika ile dostça geçinmeden ve Amerika istemeden, dünyanın hiçbir yerinde, hiç kimseye ve hiçbir şey yaptırmazlar…

    Şimdi (bana bağlı) bazı gönüllü kuruluşlar dünya ile entegrasyon adına (yani siyonizmle uyuşarak) gidip dünyanın değişik yerlerinde okullar açıyorlarsa, bu itibarla, mesela Amerika ile çatıştığımız sürece bu projelerin gerçekleştirilmesi mümkün olmaz…”[9] diyerek, herkesi Amerika’ya kayıtsız şartsız teslimiyete çağırmaktadır?

    Fetullah Hoca’ya göre: Kuvvet ve Kudret sahibi, Allah mıdır, yoksa Amerika mıdır?

    “Amerika daha uzun zaman dünyanın kaderinde çok önemli bir rol oynayacaktır. Bu realite kabul edilmeli, Amerika göz ardı edilerek, şurada veya burada kendi başına bir iş yapılmaya kalkışılmamalıdır…

    Rusya bile sizi desteklese, eğer Amerika istemezse, işinizi bozacaktır… Çünkü Amerika kendi işlerinin bozulmamasından yanadır. Bu da yadırganmamalıdır.”[10] Diyecek kadar Amerika’ya tapınan ve siyonizmin yenilmez gücüne(!) sığınan bir Fetullah Gülen, acaba Kur’an kahramanı mı, yoksa Amerika’nın kuklasımıdır?

    BEKLENEN MESİH Mİ, YOKSA PAPALIK MİSYONERİ Mİ?

    Vaazlarında ve kitaplarında:

    “Hazreti Mesih (İsa A.S) Ahir zamanda o önemli misyonu eda etmek üzere mutlaka nüzul edecektir. Nüzul edecektir ama içinizden şahs-ı manevinin muhtevi bulunduğu mana ve ruha nüzul edecektir. (Yani Hz. İsa şu anda içinizde bulunan; lideriniz ve temsilciniz olan şahsiyete inecektir.) diyerek, dolaylı biçimde Mesihliğini ve Mehdiliğini ilan eden ve nicelerini buna inandıran Fetullah Gülen;

    “Sizinle müşerref olmayı bahşettiğiniz için zatı âlilerinize en derin kalbi teşekkürlerimizi sunarız.” Diye başladığı papa’ya mektubunda:

    “Papa 6. Paul cenapları tarafından başlatılan ve devam etmekte olan Papalık Konseyi Misyonunun bir parçası olmak üzere burada bulunuyoruz.” Diyor…

    Şimdi aklımıza ve vicdanımıza güvenerek soralım:

    Fetullah Gülen beklenen Mesih veya Mehdi Aleyhisselam mı dır?

    Yoksa kendi itiraf ve ifadesiyle Papalık Konseyi Misyonunun basit bir parçası mı dır?

    Takiyye yaptığı ve ikili oynadığı açıktır. Ancak, acaba asıl aldatmak ve kullanmak istediği Hristıyanlar ve Museviler midir, yoksa Müslümanlar mıdır?

    Doğru cevap: siyonist yahudiler ve Haçlı emperyalistler Fetullah Gülen’i… Fetullah Gülen ise Müslümanları kullanmaktadır.

    Çağ ve Nesil dizisinin 4. kitabının son yazısında ve lider başlığı altında:

    “Ve eskilerin “Kaht-ı rical” dedikleri seviyeli insan, idareci ve kadro ile lider kıtlığı (yaşanıyor)

    Yakın geçmişi ve hâlihazırdaki vaziyeti itibarıyla: Şu karmaşık dünyanın gerçek manada bir lider tanıyıp tanımadığını bilemeyeceğim; bildiğim tek şey varsa o da, bizim dünyamızda böyle bir liderin olmadığıdır…

    … O Polat sinelerin ve çelikten sedaların yerinde, şimdi sinekler uçuşuyor… Evet, ateşböceklerinin yıldızlaştığı, sineklerin kartallaştığı bu talihsizler diyarında, şimdi aslan inleri, tilki çalımlarıyla inliyor… Bülbülyuvaları saksağanların elinde perişan ve her tarafta yarasalar şehrayinler tertip ediyor…

    Hakim güçler, insafsız ve temettü (sömürme) avında…

    Hasıla koskoca dünya başı boşların elinde ve bir baştan bir başa lidersizlikle kıvrım kıvrım (kıvranıyor)…” diyor ve ardından “nasıl bir lider?” diye kendisini anlatmaya başlıyor…

    Yakın geçmişteki ve günümüzdeki bütün dini ve siyasi liderleri böylesine küçümseyen ve kötüleyen Fetullah Gülen’in, şimdi Amerika’ya ve Papalığa karşı perestlik derecesindeki hürmet ve teslimiyet nasıl bağdaştırılacaktır?

    İŞTE HOCA EFENDİNİN PAPA’YA MEKTUBU:

    Pek Muhterem Papa Cenapları,

    Üç büyük dinin doğum yeri olarak bilinen toprakların, dünyayı daha iyi yaşanabilir bir mekân kılma yolundaki kutsal misyonumuzu, tam manasıyla bilen halkımdan size en içten selamları getirdik. Yoğun gündeminizden bize zaman ayırarak sizinle müşerref olmayı bahşetti­ğiniz için zatıâlilerinize en derin kalbi teşekkürlerimizi sunarız.

    Papa 6. Paul Cenapları tarafından başlatılan ve devam etmekte olan Dinlerarası Diyalog için Papalık Konseyi (PCID) misyonunun bir parçası olmak üzere burada bulunuyoruz. Bu misyonun tahakkuk edişini görmeyi arzu ediyoruz. En aciz bir şekilde hatta biraz cüret­le, bu pek kıymetli hizmetinizi icra etme yolunda en mütevazı yardımlarımızı sunmak için size geldik.

    İslâm yanlış anlaşılan bir din olmuştur ve bunda en çok suçlanacak olan Müslümanlardır. Uygun bir yerdeki vakitli bir gayret bu yan­lış anlamanın büyük oranda azalmasına katkı sağlayabilir. Müslüman dünyası, İslâm’ın asırlarla ölçülen yanlış algılanmasını silip atacak bir diyalog imkânını bağrına basacaktır.

    Beşeriyet, çelişen görüşler ortaya koydukları gerekçesiyle, zaman zaman bilim adına dini, din adına da bilimi inkâr etmiştir. Bilginin ta­mamı Allah’a aittir ve din Allah’tandır. O halde bu ikisi nasıl çelişe­bilir? İnsanlar arasında anlayışı ve hoşgörüyü artırmaya yönelik din­lerarası diyaloga yönelik ortak gayretlerimiz çok iş görebilir.

    Kendi memleketimizde şimdiye kadar, çeşitli Hıristiyan mezhep­lerinin liderleriyle diyalog içinde olduk. Bu naçiz gayretlerin boşa çıkmadığını âcizane ifade etmek isteriz. Amacımız bu üç büyük dinin inananları arasında hoşgörü ve anlayış yoluyla bir kardeşlik tesis et­mektir. Bizler bir araya gelmek suretiyle sözde medeniyetler çatışmasının gerçekleşmesini görmek isteyen yolunu şaşırmış ve şüpheci kimselere karşı dalgakıranlar gibi, isterseniz bariyerler gibi deyin, kar­şı durabiliriz.

    Geçen yıl bazı ünlü uluslararası bilim adamlarının katıldığı medeniyetler arası barış ve diyalog konulu bir sempozyum düzenledik. Bu gayretin başarısından aldığımız teşvikle bu tür etkinlikleri tekrar­lamak istiyoruz. Hali hazırda üç büyük dinin bağlıları arasındaki bağ­ları güçlendirmeye yönelik olarak dinlerarası diyalog konusunda Vatikan’ın da temsil edileceğini ümit ettiğimiz bir konferans düzenle­me sürecinde bulunuyoruz.

    Yeni fikirlerimiz varmış iddiasında bulunmuyoruz. Yine müsa­mahanıza sığınarak, bu misyonun hedeflerine yakından hizmet etmek için üstlenmek istediğimiz birkaç teklifte bulunmayı arzu ediyoruz. Hıristiyalığın üçüncü bin yılına girişi münasebetiyle yapılacak kutla­malar vesilesiyle Ortadoğu’daki Antakya, Tarsus, Efes ve Kudüs gibi bazı kutsal yerlere müşterek ziyaretleri içeren birçok etkinlik önermek istiyoruz. Bunu Sayın Cumhurbaşkanımız Demirel’in, cenaplarının ülkemizi ziyaretine ve mezkûr kutsal mekânları göstermeye davetini tekrarlamak için bir fırsat addediyoruz. Anadolu halkı size misafirperverliğini göstermeyi ve zevkle selamlamayı hararetle beklemektedir. Filistinli liderlerle diyalog kurmak suretiyle Kudüs’ü birlikte ziyaret etmemize davetiye çıkarabiliriz. Bu ziyaret bu mübarek şehri Hıristiyanlar, Yahudiler ve Müslümanların, hiçbir kısıtlama, hatta vize dahi olmaksızın serbestçe ziyaret edebileceği uluslararası bir bölge olarak ilan etme gayretlerine yönelik dev bir adım teşkil edebilir.

    Üç büyük dinden liderlerin işbirliği ile ilki Washington DC’de olmak üzere muhtelif dünya başkentlerinde bir konferanslar serisinin gerçekleştirilmesini teklif ediyoruz… İkinci serinin zamanı için Hz. İsa’nın doğumunun 2000. yıldönümü ideal olabilir.

    Bir öğrenci değişim programı da çok faydalı olacaktır. İnançlı genç insanların birlikte eğitim görmesi birbirlerine yakınlıklarını artıracaktır. Öğrenci değişim programı çerçevesinde üç büyük dinin babası olduğu ikrar edilen Hazreti İbrahim’in doğum yeri olarak bilinen, Urfa şehrindeki Harran’da bir ilahiyat okulu kurulabilir. Bu ya Harran Üniversitesi’ndeki programların genişletilmesi suretiyle, ya da üç dinin ihtiyaçlarını da temin edecek şümullü bir müfredata sahip bağımsız bir üniversite şeklinde gerçekleştirilebilir.

    Önerilen programlar aşırı büyük işler gibi algılanabilir; ama bun­lar erişilmez değildir. Dünyada iki tip insan vardır. Bazıları kendilerini topluma adapte etmeye çalışır. Diğer bazıları ise topluma uymaktansa toplumu kendi değerlerine adapte etmek ister. Toplum bütün iler­lemeleri bu ikinci tip insanlara borçludur. Onları yarattığı için Rabb’e şükürler olsun.[11]
    Şimdi soruyoruz:

    1- Fetullah Gülen’e, Papayla görüşmek ve işbirliğine girişmek üzere; Türkiye ve dünya Müslümanları böyle bir yetki verdi mi?
    Yoksa malum ve melun merkezler mi o’na böyle bir kılıf geçirdi?

    2- Bu tavrı ve telaffuzlarıyla, İslam’ın tebliğcisi ve temsilcisi mi, yoksa Vatikan’ıda kontrolüne alan siyonizmin hizmetçisi mi?
    3- Hz. Peygamber Efendimizin devrinin önemli devlet liderlerine gönderdikleri ve “Ya, bozuk ve batıl inançlarınızı bırakıp İslamiyet’e ve benim risaletime iman edersiniz. Ya da tüm tebaanızın da günahını yüklenerek cehenneme girersiniz.” İçerikli mektuplarıyla, Fetullah Gülen’in Papaya yazdığı mektubunda söyledikleri aynı şeyler midir?
    Hâlbuki Efendimizin ki, izzet ve davet, bunu ki ise, zillet ve teslimiyettir.

    4- F. Gülen, haddini aşarak, bugüne kadar İslamiyet’in hep yanlış anlaşıldığını ve bunun Müslümanların suçu olduğunu söylüyor ve doğrusunun kendisi tarafından ortaya koyulacağını ima ediyor!..
    Peki, bugüne kadar sahip çıktığını iddia ettiği Bediüzzaman ve Onun izlerini takip ettiği tüm ehlisünnet uleması; İslam’ın neresini yanlış anlamışlardı ve hangi yanlışları Müslümanlara öğütlemişlerdi?

    5- Papayı Türkiye’ye davet ve kutsal yerleri ziyaret teklifini, Süleyman Demirel adına tekrarlama yetkisini ve cesaretini kendisine kim vermişti?
    Yoksa mason Demirel’le, özel bir ilişki içindemiydi? Hani bu Hoca ve ekibi siyasetten uzak kimselerdi?

    6- Urfa’da 3 dinin ortak eğitimini verecek ilahiyat okulunu açma kararı, İsrail’le birlikte mi verilmişti?
    Çünkü AKP’li belediye Başkanı döneminde bu proje, İsrail yardımıyla Urfa’da gerçekleştirilmişti.

    7- Fetullah Gülen, acaba insanlığı en azından kendi taraftarlarını; İslam’i değerlere göre yeniden düzeltmek ve yeryüzünde adil bir düzen yerleştirmek isteyen ender ve önder bir şahsiyet miydi?
    Yoksa Papalık Konseyinin basit bir parçası, Papa hazretlerinin ve GAP’ta yatırım yapan İsrail’in bir hizmetçisi miydi?

    Chalmers Johnson (University of California’da emeritus Profesör): The sorrows of empire, New York, 2004. Bu kitapta C. Johnson, ABD’nin dış politikasının tümüyle Wolfowitz gibi neo-conların söz sahibi olduğu pentagon’un elinde olduğunu, Beyaz Saray’ın by-pass edildiğini belirtiyor. Johnson diyor ki; “ABD, ona buna demokrasi sat­mak istiyor,  Ortadoğu’ya da  “demokrasi yok” gerekçesiyle müdahale ediyor ama kendisi demokrasinin ilkelerinden uzaklaştı. ABD adeta bir imparatorluk oldu ve militarist bir düzen içinde. Ancak, ABD imparatorluğun diğer imparatorluklardan ayıran; önemli bir özellik var, ABD imparatorluğu bir “üs-ler imparatorluğu”dur. İngiliz ya da Fransızlar gibi gittiği yerlerde toprak İşgali amacı taşımıyor, dünyanın değişik bölgelerini “Üs” leri aracılığıyla kontrol altında tutup, ele geçirmeyi hedefleyen bir imparatorluktur Amerika…”

    Daha ne söylesin Johnson?! Bitmedi. Tam yerine denk geldi, son habere buyurun;

    ABD, askeri malzemelerini Türkiye üzerinden nakletmek için 7 liman ve 6 havaalanını kullanma izni aldı. ABD’nin kullanı­mına verilen liman ve alanlara ilişkin karar yürürlüğe girdi. Bush’un geçtiğimiz aylarda açıkladığı “Türkiye cephe ülkesidir;” sözleri ABD’ye verilen liman ve üslerle daha bir an­lam kazandı.
    Haber turuma devam ediyorum sevgili okur, nasıl hoşunuza gidiyor mu? Bambaşka bir dala konuyoruz, ne âlâsı var demeyin, an­layana; ‘En büyük Yahudi nisanı Nazarbayev’e verildi. Dünya Yahudileri Konseyi, Kafkasya’nın enerji merkezlerinden Kazakistan’ın Devlet Başkanı Nursultan Nazarbavev’e, medeniyetlerarası diyaloga katkılarından dolayı, “Uluslararası Maimonides Nişanı-en büyük Yahudi nişanı” verdi. Avrasya Kuruluşları Bir­likleri temsilcileri ve Nazarbayev ödül töreni­nin ardından, Kazakistan-Astana’da yeni yapılan Orta Asya’nın en büyük sinagogu Rachel-Habad Lyubavivch’i törenle açtılar.[12]Bu en büyük Yahudi nişanının Nazarbayav’e verilmesinin diğer önemli sebebi ise; Fetullah Gülen’in okullarına yaptığı destek olduğu konuşulmaktadır.

    Fetullah Gülen’le MOON ve MASON İlişkileri:

    Moon tarikatı ile Fetullah teşkilatı arasındaki örgütlenme modellerindeki siyonist ilişkileri yanında en önemli benzerlikse birinin Mesihliğe, diğerinin ise İslam temsilciliğine ve Mehdiliğe soyunmalarıdır.

    Her ikisini de organize eden, Amerika’daki siyonist kuruluş; CSIS’tır.

    CSIS 1962’de Georgetown Üniversitesi’nde kurulmuş. Amerikan devletine ve özellikle petrol ve silah şirketlerine hizmet veriyor. Dış ülke yöneticileriyle, bürokratlarıyla, Amerikan çıkarlarına dolaylı ya da dolaysız hizmet verecek akademisyenlerle bağlar kuran CSIS, bir devlet kurumuyken, yenidünya düzenine uyum sağlamak üzere şirkete dönüştürülüyor. CSIS, Ortadoğu petropolitik araştırmalarıyla da ünlüdür. Ortadoğu bölümünün içinde Türkiye’ye de ayrı bir bölüm açılmış, CSIS birimlerinin yönetimlerinde istihbarat örgütlerinde ve yabancı ülke­lerdeki diplomatik misyonlarda dünya deneyimi kazanmış eski dev­let memurları bulunuyor. Üçüncü ülke adamları da bu şeflere raporlar hazırlıyorlar.

    CSIS yabancı devletlerin görevlilerini de gerektiğinde ABD’de konuk edip, ilgili konularda konferans vermelerini sağlar. Bunların arasında Türkiye başbakanları da bulunmaktadır. Hatta CSIS, Kafkasya petrol boru hatları ile ilgili toplantılarını Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Başbakanlığında gerçekleştirmiştir. Sonraları Başba­kanlık danışmanlığına getirilen, DSP milletvekili ve Ecevit’in ABD gezilerinde en büyük yardımcısı, 2002 yılında Kıbrıs’dan sorumlu Devlet Bakanı, Harvard mezunu Tayyibe Gülek komitenin sekreterliğine getirilmiştir. CİA’nın bile bir üst kurumu gibi çalışan CSIS Fetullah Gülen’inde en büyük destekçisidir.

     Çok sayıda ülkenin yanı Sıra ABD’de de “lobby” oluşturmak gerekçesiyle okullar kurulması bir gazetede şu ilginç açıklamayla yer alı­yordu:

    “Gülen’in şimdiki planı, ABD’de Türklere de, Amerikalılara da eğitim verecek bir üniversite açmak. Virginia eyaletine bağlı kü­çük bir yerleşim birimi olan Staunton’da, boşaltılmış bir hasta­ne binasını devralan “Fethullahçı” grup, burada binden fazla öğrenci kapasiteli bir üniversitenin kurulması çalışmalarına başladı. Gülen Londra’da kolej açmış, matematik doktoru bir arkadaş­larının” Staunton Belediyesi ile anlaşması halinde, üniversitenin dünyanın her yanından gelecek öğrencilere “evet” diyeceğini söylüyor.[13]      

    “Fethullah Gülen’in” adamları tüm dünyada, Tanzanya’dan Çin’e çoğunluğu eski Sovyetler Birliği Türki cumhuriyetlerinde yer alan 200’den fazla okul kurdular. Bu okullar İslam’dan çok Türk milliyetçiliğini esas alan bir felsefeyi yaymaktadır. “Balkanlar’dan Çin’e, Türkiye’yi model alan bu seçkinlerin oluşumunu görmek istiyor. (…) Bu kuruluşlar Müslüman olmayan öğrencileri kabul ediyorlar ve yüksek nitelikleri ve belki de İngilizceyi temel eğitim dili olarak kullanmaları nedeniyle, seçkinlerin ço­cuklarını çekmektedir.

     Şimdi soralım İngilizce dilinde eğitim yapmayı esas alan bu kurumların “Türk milliyetçiliğini” nasıl esas aldığı ya da nasıl olup Tanzanya veya Çin yönetimleri seçkin aile çocuklarının “Türk Milliyetçiliğini esas alan” bir eğitimden geçirilmesine izin vermektedir.

    “The man and his movement” (Bir Adam ve Hareketi)

    26-27 Nişan 2001 tarihlerinde, Georgetown Üniversitesi’nde CMCU’nun son konferansının konusu “F. Gülen: The man and his movement (Bir adam ve onun hareketi) idi. Bu konferansta F. Gülen’in son elli yılda gelişen İslam’i hareketler içinde kurumlaşan tek hareket olduğuna dikkat çekildiğine ve eski CIA şefi Graham Fuller’in RAND şirketi adına Türkiye Nurculuğunu araştırmaya baş­lamış olduğuna dikkat edilirse ABD ile “entegrasyon”un liberal olarak tamamlanmak üzere olduğu söylenebilir.

    CMCU konferansına katılanların kimlikleri ve deneyleri, Georgetovvn Devlet Üniversitesi’nin yanı sıra ABD yönetiminin ve Yahudi örgütleri ile Alman Stiftung’larının Türkiye’deki din ve ifade hürriyetine verdikleri değerin açık bir göstergesiydi (!): Toplantıya katılanların özellikleri işin ne denli ciddiye alındığını göstermekteydi:

    Alan Makowsky: ABD Dışişleri istihbarat Bürosu eski şefi, Körfez savaşında ordu danışmanı, İsrail destekçisi WINEP (Washington Institute for Near East Policy) görevlisi. George Harris: ABD eski dışişleri görevlisi, eski Ankara B.elçisi, istihbarat uzmanı, Asya, Ortadoğu, Güneydoğu Asya uzmanı.

    Roscoe Suddarth: Mali 1961, Lübnan 1963-65, Yemen 1967, Ürdün 1974-1990 istihbarat görevlisi, Middle East Institute başkanı.

    Graham Edmund Fuller: Yemen, Cidde, Uzakdoğu CIA görev­lisi, ABD Hava Kuvvetleri ne bağlı RAND şirketi yöneticisi. Şimdi­lerde Türkiye’deki Nurcu hareketini ve “Irak, Bahreyn, Suudi Ara­bistan, Kuveyt ve Birleşik Arap Emirlikleri’ndeki çeşitli “Şii Müslü­man Cemaatlerin gelecekteki politik rolleri’ni Rend Francke ile bir­likte araştırıyor. Şii araştırması projesinin amacı, “Şiilerin özgürlü­ğü, siyasete ve yönetime katılımlarının geliştirilmesinin yollarını bulmak” olarak belirtilmektedir.

    Bekim Akal: Wolkswagen Stiftung, Almanya (Yahudi)

    Osman Bakkar: Georgetovvn CMCU Malezya Seksiyonu İslâm Kürsüsü başkanı.

    Thomas Mitchel: Vatikan Cizvit seksiyonu sorumlusu, İstanbul Bediüzzaman ve “medeniyetler arası diyalog” konferansları katılımcısı.

    Mücahit Bilici: Sosyolog, Boğaziçi Üniversitesi.

    Yasin Aktay: Prof. ODTÜ.

    Fahri Çakı: Sosyolog; İstanbul Üniversitesi’nden sonra Temple’da Nurcu Hareketin Sosyo-Ekonomik gelişmesi tezini hazırlıyor.

    Ahmet Kuru: Bilkent Üniversitesi, Fatih Üniversitesi. Utah Üniversitesi doktora öğrencisi.

    Zeki Santoprak: ABD Rumi Forum Başkanı, Marmara İlahiyat Fakültesi, El-Ezher, Harran Üniversitesi. Şimdi Washington Katolik Üniversitesi’nde.

    Hakan Yavuz: Utah Üniversitesi.

    Elizabeth Özdalga: Prof. ODTÜ, CHP araştırmacısı, İsveç Enstitüsü müdürü, İslâm Konferansı örgütleyicisi, “Adsız Kahraman: Fethullah Gülen Cemaatinin kadınları arsında Bireysellik ve İçselleşmiş Yansıma” tebliği sahibi.

    Bayram Balcı: Fransa Milli İltica Bürosu, Paris Arap Dünyası gö­revlisi, Fransa Dışişleri Orta Asya Araştırmaları Enstitüsü’nde kadrolu eleman.

    Berna Turam: McGill Üniversitesi/Kanada

    ABD Dışişleri Bakanlığı Uluslararası Din Hürriyeti Bürosunca hazırlanan “Din Hürriyeti-Türkiye Raporu”nda “İslamic Leader” ve  “Moderate İslamic Leader” olarak kayıtlara geçirilen F. Gülen’in hakları Amerikan devletince resmen savunulduktan sonra, ilginin boyutu genişletilmekte ve Amerikan devletinin ünlü üniversite­sinde akademik bir düzeye yükselmekte olduğu görülüyordu. Bu “bilimsel” toplantıyı CMCU ve “The Rumi Forum” düzenlemişti.

    Bu tür “bilimsel” toplantıların sonuçlarının resmi raporlara etkisi elbette olumlu olacaktı.  ABD Dışişleri Bakanlığının raporlarında “Ilımlı İslami Lider” olarak sıfat kazanan F. Gülen, 2002 yılı Din Hürriyeti Raporu’nda “İslamic philosopher and leader/İslam Filozofu ve Lideri” olarak nitelenmeye başlanmıştır.

    Aynı raporun 44. paragrafında “Din Hürriyeti Tacizleri” başlığı altında “Ahmadi Muslims” cemaati diye Cüppeli Ahmet Hoca’ya da sahip çıkılmıştır.[14]
    ABD’de son toplantıysa 19-20 Nisan 2004’de Washington’daki John Hopkins Üniversitesi’nde “Abant in Washington-İslam. Laiklik ve Demokrasi: Türk Deneyimi”  adı altında toplandı.

    Toplantının programına göre, “hoş geldiniz” konuşmalarını Francis Fukuyama ve “Abant Platformu” başlığıyla Bilgi Üniversitesi’nden Mete Tuncay yaptı. Açılış konuşmalarını ise diyanetten sorumlu Devlet Bakanı Prof. Mehmet Aydın ile ABD Dışişleri Müste­şarı eski Ankara Büyükelçisi Marc Grossman yaptı. Türkiye Gazeteciler ve yazarla Vakfıénca çağrısı yapılan ve ATFA (American Turkish Friends Association- Fairfax) örgütlenen bu ilginç konferansın panellerine içinde CIA şefleri yanında Cengiz Çandar’da vardı.

    Türkiye’nin İslam, Laiklik ve Demokrasi Deneyimi ve Ortadoğu, Kafkaslar ve Orta Asya İlişkisi Yuvarlak Masa Toplantısı:

    Kemal Derviş (CHP Genel Başkan Yardımcısı-Açılış konuşması),  Elisabeth Özdalga  (CHP eski danışmanı, TESEV danışmanı, İsveç Araştırma Enstitütüsü),  Cüneyt Ülsever  (Liberal Dü­şünce Topluluğu Derneği, Hürriyet Gazetesi), Sabri Sayarı (Eski RAND danışmanı, Georgetown Ünv.), Emal Uşşaklı (TGYV), Hüse­yin Gülerce (TGYV), Kenan Gürsoy (Galatasaray Unv.), Fehmi Koru (Yeni Şafak Gazt.), Kemal Karpat (WisconsinUnv.), Ruşen Çakır (TESEV), Mithat Melen ( İstanbul Unv.) Şahin Alpay (Bahçeşehir Unv.), Zeki Sarıtoprak (John Caroll Unv.), Adnan As­lan (ISAM-İslami Araştırmalar Merkezi), Ömer Taşpınar (John Hopkins Unv. Brookings Inst), Zeyno Baran (Nixon Center, Eski CSIS elemanı), Cengiz Çandar (Sabah Gazetesi), Seda Çiftçi (CSIS elemanı), Hakan Yavuz, Henry Barkey, John Lee Esposito David Calleo, Steven A. Cook, Svante Cornell, James Miller, Charles Fairbanks, Carter Findley, Hussain Haqqani (Carnegie Endowment), Barry Jacobs ve Anatol Lieven (American Jewish Committee), Heath Lowry, Zack Messitte (Saint Mary’s College), Eric Hooglund (Filistin Araştırmaları) ve John Hulsman (Heritage Fdn.)

    Toplantıya ABD eski Ankara Büyükelçisi ve Dışişleri Siyaset Planlama Müsteşarı Marc Grossman’ın yanı sıra Savunma Bakanlığı Müsteşarı Paul Wolfowitz’in de katılarak açılış konuşması yapacağı, eski Büyükelçisi ve NED yönetim kurulu eski “üyesi Abramowitz, WINEP eski direktörü, 1990’da Ortadoğu’ya ABD askeri saldırısı sırasında danışmanlık yapmış olan, ABD Temsilciler Meclisi Perso­nel Direktörü Alan Makowski Temsilcilerden Rober Wexler, John Hopkins Arap İşleri uzmanı Fuad Ajami’nin ve Frederick Star’ın da katılacağı duyurulmuştu Ne ki, toplantıya on gün kala bu kişilerin katılamayacağı görüldü.

    Türkiye’de DGM’nin aradığı kişi, ABD’deki devlet üniversitesinde adına düzenlenen bilimsel toplantılarla onurlandırılıyor, ABD Dışişleri’nin katıldığı toplantılar düzenleniyor. Bir kişinin bir mahkeme tarafından aranıp aranmaması, haklılığı ya da haksızlığı önemli görülmeyebilir. Ancak uzun yıllar devlet yöneticilerince “stratejik ortak” olarak tanıtılan ABD’nin tutumuna kısa bir soruyla değinilebilir: ABD’nin ulusal güvenlik gerekçesiyle aradığı herhangi bir kişi için,  örneğin Ankara Üniversitesi’nde onurlandırıcı bir konferans düzenlense, ABD Dışişleri ne yapar?[15]
    Kim ne derse desin, işin özü, toplulukların dinsel inançlarını kullanılarak oynanan oyun değişmiyor. Moon hareketi Mesih’e; Fetullahcılık hareketi de Mehdi’ye özeniyor. Her ikisinin yolu da “Amerika ile entegrasyon” projesine çıkıyor.

    Moon misyonerleri örgüte bilimsel bir saygınlık görüntüsü vermek için üniversitelerden adam seçiyorlar. Bu katılımcıların Moon’un ki­lisesine bağlı olmadığını, salt ayrı dinlerin ya da üniversitelerin tem­silcileri olduğu izlenimini vermeye çalışıyorlardı. Örneğin, turcular arasında Moon tarafından kutsal nikâhla evlendirilmiş en az on yıl­lık kilise üyelerinin örgüt bağlarından söz edilmiyordu.

    Türkiye’yi temsil edenler arasında, Dünya dinleri Gençlik Semineri’ ne katılan Ahmet Davutoğlu bulunuyordu. Boğaziçi Üniversitesi’nin öğretim görevlisi Davutoğlu, ma­sumane çalışmaların amacını şu ilginç sözlerle açıklıyordu:

    “Amerika’da kendi sahasında söz sahibi değişik dinlere mensup bir grup profesörün önderliğini yaptığı bu gezide, amaç bilfiil yaşayarak daha açık bir ifade ile “gezici bir üniversite” şek­linde, dinler arasında diyalog ve fikir alışverişi temin etmektir. İlki geçen sene yapılan bu geziye Türk temsilciler bu sene katıl­dı. Gerek ABD’de gerekse Kudüs’te gerçekten çok değerli göz­lemler yapma imkânı bulduk.[16]
     Mooncular “Kitlelerin yoğun ilgisini çeken Futbola da el attılar. Seul’de, her girişimin adında yer aldığı gibi, amaç “barış” olarak bildirilir. 10 Temmuz 2003 futbol turnuvasına Fransa’dan Olympique Lyonnais, Güney Afrika’dan Kaizer Chiefs, Almanya’dan TSV 1860 München, ABD’den Los Angeles Galaxy, Hollanda’dan PSV Eindhoven, Uruguay’dan Club Nacional de Football ve Güney Ko­re’den de Seongnam Ilhwa takımları katılır. Türkiye’den de Beşik­taş Spor Kulübü Futbol Takımı turnuvada yerini alır. Birinciye 2 milyon dolar ve ikincinin de 500.000 dolar ödül verilir. Bu haber Türkiye’deki bazı gazetelerde kısaca yer alır. Ama “Moon tarikatı­nın düzenlediği turnuva” sözleri ve Moon örgütlenmesiyle ilgili kısa bilgiler yer alır. Bu durumda Din-Kilise-Futbol ilişkisi üzerine akla gelebilecek sorulara yanıt da Zaman gazetesinde yer alır. Fatih Üniversitesi öğretim üyelerinden Yrd. Doç. Ali Murat Yel, kutsallık ile futbol ve din arasındaki ilişkinin teorik temellerini ortaya koyar.

    Öğretim üyesinin yazısındaki satırlar yeterince aydınlatıcı ve tarikat-futbol ilişkisini kötüleyenlere de iyi bir yanıt oluşturur:

    “(..) Futbol da birçok özelliğinden dolayı yeni bir dini hareket olarak görülebilir. “Para-religious-Din gibi” olarak da adlandı­rılan bu hareketlerde dini herhangi bir unsur olmamasına rağ­men pek çok hususta dine benzer özelliklere rastlanılmaktadır.[17]
    1990’h yıllarda Moon Hazretleri’nin PWPA örgütünün Türkiye etkinlikleri iyice yaygınlaşıyor. Medeniyetler arası Diyalog, Bediüzzaman Said-i Nursi Konferansları adı altında yapılan toplantılara Amerika’dan gelip konuk olanlar çoğalıyor. Bu adamlarla ilgili övgüleri Aksiyon dergisinde, Zaman gazetesinde bolca bulmak mümkündür.

    AKP’li ve Fetullah Gülen’ci Belediye Başkanları eliyle, tarihi camiler yıkılarak, kiliseler açılmaya başlanmıştır.

    755 yıllık camiyi yıktılar ve Moon-Presbiteryen müritlerini karşıladılar.

    Özellikle 2000-2002 yılları arasında dünya mirası, dinlerarası di­yalog, din-inanç turizmi denilerek bizzat hükümet tarafından uygu­lanan projeyle cemaatsiz kiliseler kurulurken, antik kiliseler de yeni­lenmiştir. Aynı dönem içinde sayısız tarihi cami ise ya yıkıma ter­kedilmiş ya da bilerek ve istenerek yıkılmıştır. Bunun son örneği Türklerin 1211 yılında kurdukları Denizli kentinde yaşanmıştır.

    “Denizli’de Türklerin ilk yerleşimde kurdukları ve sayısız deprem­den sonra onarıp açık tuttukları, 755 yıllık Ulu Cami ve tarihsel Selçuklu minaresi birbirini izleyen 2 gecede belediye” ekiplerince yıkıldı. Bu yıkımın ardından yedi gün geçmeden yörede devlet eliyle yenilenen 11 kiliseden biri olan ve yüzlerce yıldır kullanılmayan antik Pamukkale Kilisesi’nin yıkıntıları arasında ayin düzenlenmiştir. Ayini düzenleyen birinci grup Amerikan Presbiterian kilisesi mensupla­rıdır. Bu grubun başında Amerikalı papaz Bruce McDovvell ve Pa­paz İlhan Kekinöz bulunmuştur, ikinci 25 kişilik grup ise Unification Church bağlılarıdır.[18]
    “Ayinciler devlet yöneticilerinden vali yardımcısı Musa Uçar’ı zi­yaret etmişler ve ondan hediyeler almışlardır. “Bizans dönemi kalıntılarıyla Amerikalı papazın ya da Korelilerin ne tür bir dinsel ilişkisi olabilir? Onlar kendi inançlarına uygun ayin yapacak bir yer bulamamışlar mıdır?” gibi ilginç soruların yanıtını verecek bir laik rejime sahip çıkacak bir görevli herhalde vardır.

    Koreli misyonerler de deprem yıkımından yararlanarak sözde yardım diye yerleştikten sonra, dışı ev, içi kilise inanç merkezleri kurmayı başardılar. Örneğin Yalova yakınlarında, deniz kıyısında ev-kilise kuran misyonerler, üşenmeyip deprem bölgesini geziyorlar ve topladıkları çocukları kiliselere ziyarete götürüyor ve beyinlerini yıkıyorlar.

    Uluslar arası örgütlenmeyi gerçekleştiren Moon, Amerika’nın desteği ile dünya egemenliği ardında koşan devletlerin örtülü operasyon ilkelerini çağrıştıran önemli bir açıklama yapmıştı:

    “Zamanı geldiğinde, dünyayı yönetmek için otomatik (olarak işleyen) bir teokratik düzene sahip olmalıyız. Siyaseti dinden ayıramayız. Hülyamda, bir (…) siyasi parti var; bu parti (…) da içine almalıdır. Bir kolumuzla dini dünyayı, öteki kolumuzla da siyasi dünyayı kucaklayabiliriz.

    Bunları söyleyen kişinin liderliğini yaptığı cemaat, yüzlerce şirke­te, vakıflara. okullara, üniversiteye, yayın evlerine, gazetelere, dini İlmi örgütlere, hoşgörü kuruluşlarına, v.b sahip. Cemaat gençliğe büyük önem veriyor. Onları örgütlüyor beyinlerindeki tüm inançları silip kendi safsatalarını yerleştiriyor ve yalnız cemaat içinde ve lideri için kapalı devre yaşamayı öğretiyor. Politikacı­lar, yazarlar, sanatçılar, bilim adamları, cemaatin çevresinde toplanıyorlar. Dünyanın pir çok ülkesinde kuruluşları olan bu cemaatin, kaynağı merak edilen parasının büyüklüğü hesap edilemiyor

    Söz konusu cemaatin lideri Amerika’da bulunuyor. Cemaatin li­derine “hazret-üstad” deniyor ama, o bir “Hoca Efendi” değil. O Reverand (Hazret) Sung Myung (Moon) ve cemaatinin adı ise; Dünya Hıristiyanlığını Birleştirmek İçin Kutsal Ruh Cemiyeti, kısaca Unification Church (UC, Birleştirme Kilisesi)’dir.

    Moon’un, Kore istihbarat servisi K-CIA ile başladığı ve Amerika’daki siyonist yahudi stratejistlerin desteği ile parlayıp şöhret kazandığı bu şeytan tarikatında, Japonya’nın ilginç iş adamları, ABD politikacıları, ABD başkanları, Yahudiler Güney Amerikalılar, Katolikler, Protestanlar, Müslümanlar bulunmaktadır.  Moon’a göre dünyadaki kötülüklerin kökeninde “Adem” baba ile “Havva” ananın işledikleri günah bulunmaktadır. Bu yasak ilişkiden doğan çocuğun kanı da işte bu yüzden kirlenmiştir. O nedenle insanlığın kurtuluşu ancak ve ancak, kanının temizlen­mesiyle gerçekleşebilir. Temizleyici kan ise; dönemim gerçek ana-babası yani Moon ve Moon’un karısının damarlarında akmaktadır. Artık asıl olan Adem ile Havva değil, kendilerini “true-parents” yani “gerçek ana-baba” olarak ilan eden Moon ve eşidir.

    Yeni ve temiz ana-babaların yetiştirilmesi, kurtuluşun en temel koşuludur. Temiz ana-babalar ise ancak kutsal nikâh törenlerle birleşebilirler. “True-Parents days (günlerinde) Sung Myung Moon ‘Hazretleri’ binlerce yeni çifti kutsuyor ya da evli olanları yeniden nikâhlayarak toplu düğün düzenliyor. Nikâhları kutsanan çiftler, Moon’un kanını temsilen birer kadeh şarap içiyorlar. Böylece Adem ve Havva’nın şeytanla işbirliği yaparak kirlettikleri insan kanı da temizlenmiş oluyor.

    Moon’un gençlik örgütünün eski yöneticisinin gönderdiği mektuptaki şu bilgi bu işlerin, yalnızca kilise çevresini geliş­tirmek üzere, siyasal-bilimsel toplantılar düzenlenmesini aştığını gös­teriyor. Mektuptan okuyalım:

    “… Dünkü New York Post (16 Aralık 1999) Moon’un 13 Şubat kitlesel düğün törenlerine (giriş) ücretinin 100 dolar olduğunu yazıyordu ama haberde bir eksilik vardı. Gerçekte evlenen çiftlerin binlerle ifade edilen dolarlar ödeme zorunluluğundan söz edilmiyordu.”

    Moon’un Mesihliğinin nedeni ise şöyle belirtilir. Moon’a göre Hz. İsa politik becerisi bulunmadığından, Hıristiyanlığı ve insanlığı kurtaramamıştır. Bu nedenle Moon kendini Mesih olarak ilan ediyor. Sorgusuz bağlanılacak her şeyh-dede-şef örgütünde olduğu gibi, eleman devşirilme işi, hem Moonculukta, hem Fetullaçılıkta beyin yıkama esasına dayanır.

    İnsanlığı kurtaracak bir ‘Mesih’ olarak, ortaya çıkan Moon’a kimse sahte peygamber diyememektedir. Bu örgütle Fetullah Gülen’nin yapılanma modeli oldukça benzeşmektedir. Ancak Türkiye merkezli Moon kilisesi kadar büyük değildir.  Her ne kadar iki örgütün yükselmeye başlamaları Amerika’nın başlattığı, 1950’lerin komünizmle mücade­le örgütlenmesine dayanıyorsa da, Moon Hazretleri, Amerika’ya uzaktan yaslanacağına, kendisini ABD’ye atmış ve kırk yıldan bu yana işin ana müteahhitliğine soyunmuş bulunuyor. Fetullah Gülen ise: kırk yılın ardından farkına varmış ki; “Güç neredeyse orada olunmak” der gibi, o da Amerika’ya taşınmış. ABD federal devlet yönetimiyle içli dışlı olmayı başaran Moon, her geçen yılın ardından kutsallığının en üst noktasına ulaşmıştır. Her yıl 10-15 Şubat arasında “Gerçek Ana-Baba” nın doğum günleri büyük gösterilerle ve ayinlerle kutlanmaktadır. Tıpkı peygamberlerin do­ğum günlerinin kutlandığı gibi. Bu arada, onun otellerinde intihar ölümleri de sıklaşıyor. İki yıl önce kendi oğlu da aynı otelde intihar etmişti.

    Moon’un, Amerika’da merkezleşmeyi seçmesinin nedenini an­lamak, o denli zor değil. Moon Hazretleri cin gibi akıllıdır; dünya­nın değişik ülkelerine Hristiyanlık Kilisesi olarak gitmenin olanaksız­lığını görmüş ve her dinden, her milliyetten insanlarla ilişki kurmak üzere entel örgütleri oluşturmuş. Bilim adamları, barış kadınları, dinler arası federasyon, dünya üniversiteleri federasyonları gibi sa­yısız örgüt kurulmuş.

    İşte bunlardan, PWPA (Proffesors World Peace Academy /Profesörler Dünya Barış Akademisi) ile dünyanın dön bucağında toplantılar düzenletmiş. PWPA’ nın el atmadığı konu yok. “Sovyet­ler yıkıldıktan sonra ne olacak?”dan “Afrika’nın geleceği” ne, “La­tin Amerika’nın borç sorunları” ndan “Ortadoğu’da ticaret ve barış süreci”ne, “İslamın sorunlarından” Ermenistan’ın kalkınma yolla­rına dek, akla gelebilecek ne denli konu ya da bölgesel sorun var­sa, hemen hemen tümü için “konferans” ve “sempozyum” adı al­tında, 1973’den bu yana 400’ü aşkın toplantı düzenlenmiş.

    Birleştirme Kilisesi Türkiye’ye giriyor

    PWPA’nın Türkiye’deki ilk başkanı ünlü siyasetçi Kasım Gülek’dir. Onun Koreli Moon’un kilisesince kurulmuş olan bir tarikatı Türkiye’de başkan olarak temsil etmesinin gerekçelerini anlamak mümkün değil ama, onun yaşamına kısaca göz atmak bize bazı ip uçları verebilir.

    Kasım Gülek (Adana 1910- Washington 1996) İttihat ve Terakki üyesi Mustafa Rıfat Bey’in ve Tayyibe Gülek’in oğludur. GS Li­sesi ve Robert Kolej’de, Paris Ecole Science Politiques (1924-28), Columbia University (Dr.l928)’de eğitim gördü. ABD’de öğrenciy­ken Chase Manhattan Bank’da çalıştı. Harvard Üniveristesi’nde iş­letmede “master” yaptı. Rockfeller bursuyla Berlin Üniversitesi’nde, Cambridge Üniversitesi’nde çalışmalar yaptı. Cambridge rektörünün tavsiyesiyle CHP’ne girdi; Bilecik Milletvekilliği yaptı, Bayındırlık Bakanlığı, Ulaştırma Bakanlığı, CHP Genel Sekreterliği görevlerinde bulundu.

    1958 yılında Kuzey Atlantik Ansamblesi Başkanı (1957-1959) Albay J. J. Fens, Menderes hükümetinden Türk heyetinin bildi­rilmesini ister. CHP’den Nüvit Yetkin seçilir. Harekete geçen CHP Genel Sekreteri Kasım Gülek, Colonel (Albay) Fens’e mektup yazar ye Nüvit Yetkin yerine kendisinin çağrılmasını ister. Konu Za­fer Gazetesi’nde manşet olur. Kasım Gülek, İnönü’ye böyle bir mektup yazmadığın9ı söyler. Bir gün sonra, gazete mektubun kopya­sını yayınlayınca, İsmet İnönü, Kasım Gülek’e güvenemeyeceğini bildirerek, görevden ayrılmasını ister. İnönü’nün 1950’den 1957’ye, dek görevde tuttuğu Kasım Gülek ile çalışmasının nedeni; Gülek’in yeteneklerinin yanı sıra; O’nun yabancılarla kurduğu sıkı dostluklarından yarar umması olabilir. Ne de olsa İnönü, onun Amerikan ilişkilerinden 1948’de yararlanmayı düşünmüştü,

    Kasım Gülek, Kore Birleşmiş Milletler Komisyonu Başkanlığı (1950-1953) Kuzey Atlantik Ansamblesi Başkanlığı (1968-1969), NATO Parlamenterler Konferansı Başkan Yardımcılığı ve Kontenjan Senatörlüğü yaptı. Kasım Gülek’in yaşamında en ilginç teklif Gene­ral McArthur’dan geldi. MacArthur, Gülek’ten ABD’de kalarak senatör olmasını istemişti.

    1980’li yıllarda Sung Myung Moon’un Türkiye ilişkilerini yürüten Kasım Gülek, Unification Church’ü güçlendirmek için büyük çaba gösterdi. Örgütü, ABD Büyükelçisi Şükrü Elekdağ’a “empoze” et­meye çalıştı. Kasım Gülek bu arada Fetullah Gülen’le dostluğu ilerletti ve onu ABD Büyükelçisi Morton Abramowitz ile tanıştır­dı. Kasım Gülek, yaşlılık yıllarında yeniden CHP ile ilişki kurdu.

    Kasım Gülek’in baldızı Aylin Radomisli, uzun yıllar ABD’de yaşadı; Amerikan ordusuna katıldı; Asya’da elçilik görevine atanacağı söylenirken, 19 Ocak 1995’de evinin bahçesinde ölü bulundu. Ölümün nedeni araba kazası olarak kayıtlara geçirildi. Aylin Radomisli’nin Türkiye’den ilginç konuklan oluyordu. Yakın arkada­şı Aylin Gönensay (Eski dışişleri ve devlet bakanlarından Emre Gönensay’ın eşi) bunlardan biriyle tanışır. Bu adam Zaman gazetesinin ihtiyaçları için Amerika’dadır.

    Kasım Gülek’in kızı Tayyibe Gülek, Teyzesi Aylin Rodomisli ile ABD’de yaşadı. Harvard’ı bitirdikten sonra, Türkiye iktisâdını pek ama pek iyi yönetenlerin yuvası London School of Economics’ te yüksek lisans yaptı. Türkiye’ye döndü. Engin deneyimlerine güven duyularak Başbakanlık Danışmanlığına getirildi. Türkiye’nin Bakû-Ceyhan Boru Hattı Sekreterliğini yürütürken, Ecevit’lerin kontenjanından Adana Milletvekili (1999) olarak TBMM’ye girdi. Ecevit onu ABD gezilerinde hep yanında bulundurdu. Tayyibe Gülek Temmuz 2002’de Kıbrıs’tan sorumlu devlet bakan­lığı görevine getirildi

    ABD’lilerle 1920’li yıllardan beri içli dışlı olan Kasım Gülek, moon tarikatı elemanlarının da katıldığı ilk toplantıyı, 1982’de İstanbul’da yapmıştı. Bu toplantılarda Moon’un Ortadoğu Temsilcisi, Thomas Cromwell başta olmak üzere Moon’un örgütle­rinden ve yerlilerden birçok yönetici katılmıştı. Toplantıların ko­nuları da ilginç; 21 Yüzyıl Eğitimi ve Türk Yunan İlişkileri. Bu toplantılara katılan Türk büyükleri de ilginç kişilerdendi.  Emre Gönensay, Sabahattin Zaim, Erkek Akurgal, İlahiyat Fakültelerinin dekanları, sanatçılar, ünlü Belediye Başkanlarından Gülay Atığ, Semra Özal, Diğer uluslar arası toplantılara katılanlar arasında, De­niz Baykal, Hayri Erdoğan Alkin, Handan Kepir gibi ta­nınmışlar da vardı.

    Moon’un PWPA toplantılarında en sık görülen İlahiyatçıların başında Salih Tuğ gibi İlahiyat Fakültesi dekanları geliyor. İlim Yayma Cemiyeti üyelerinden ve Aydınlar Ocağı eski başkanlarından Salih Tuğ 1997’de Kanal 7 televizyonunda Fehmi Koru ile programa çıkıyor ve Moon’un Church hareketini öve öve bitiremiyordu. Bu toplantılara katılmış olan Yaşar Nuri Öztürk Moon’un İlahiyatçılara 45 gün süren Amerika gezisi ayarladığını söylüyordu.

    Anlaşılıyor ki, (Birleştirme Kilisesi), Hrıstiyan ya da Müslüman ayırt etmiyor, önüne geleni birleştiriyordu. Tolaransçı Hocaefendi’yi, Belediye Başkanını Cumhurbaşkanı’nın eşini Devlet Bakanlarını ve daha nice ünlüyü yan yana getirebiliyor. Ayrı bir kitap konusu olacak kadar geniştir. Moon’un Türkiye ve Türkiyeli tarikatlarla ilişkileri. Şimdilik, Unification Church’ün yayınlarına gö­re toplantıları kısa bir listede toparlamak yararlı olabilir:

    1982 Roma: Kasım Gülek,

    1982 İstanbul Hazırlık Toplantısı: Bu toplantıyı Moon’un sağ kolu Chung Hwan Kwak vönetivor ve Kasım-Nilüfer Gülek Türkiye düzenlemesini yapıyorlar.         

    1984 Roma: Hayri Erdoğan ilkin (Konferans Başkanı olarak),Prof. Sabahattin Zaim

    1986 İstanbul Hilton “21. Yüzyılda Eğitim” Kasım Gülek, Sabahattin Zaim. PWPA’ nın ABD başkanı Nicholas Kitrie ve Yu­nanistan’dan Evanghelos Moutsopoulos da katılıyor.

    1986        İstanbul Hilton:  “Türk-Yunan İlişkileri” Sabahattin Zaim, Ekrem Akurgal, Emre Gönensay (Sonra başbakan Danışmanı, T.C Dışişleri Bakanı, Nilüfer Gülek’in kardeşi Aylin Radomisli’nin Amerika’dan yakın dostu), Kasım Gülek.

    1987 Chicago: Kasım Gülek

    1988 Londra: Prof. Handan Kepir Sinangil   (Robert kolej /Bosphorus. Un)

    1991 İstanbul President Oteli.

    1994 İstanbul the Marmara Oteli.

    1996 İstanbul (1-14 Haziran).

    Öteki katılımcılar: Deniz Baykal, Işılay Saygın, Mehmet Aydın (9 Eylül Üniv. İlahiyat Fak. Dekanı, Abant toplantıları yöneticisi, (18 Kasım 2002 AKP) Abdullah Gül Hükümeti Devlet Bakanı), Sabri Orman, Ali Şafak E. Ruhi Fığlalı, Gülay Atığ (Aslıtürk), Semra Özal, Nilüfer Narlı, Nevzat Yalçıntaş, Lütfü Doğan, Osman Zümrüt, Şerafettin Gölcük, Salih Tuğ, Fehmi Koru, Barış Manço, Ayseli Gürsoy.

    ABD’den İstanbul toplantılarına katılanlar arasında Moon’un has adamları Richard Rubinstein, Nicholas Kittrie’nin yanı sıra Yunanistan’dan, Ürdün’den, Mısır’dan, Kore’den gelenler var.

    Kasım Gülek’in, ölümü üzerine, PWPA’nın Türkiye başkanlığını Dr. Hayri Erdoğan Alkin üstlendi. Hayri Erdoğan Alkin, eski adıyla Robert Kolej devamıyla Bosphorus University’de profesörlüğünün yanı sıra Türk Ekonomi Bankası (TEB) yönetim kurulu üyeliği yapmaktaydı. İlkin, aynı zamanda NED’den büyük parasal des­tek alan ve Türk Dışişleri politikasını yönlendirmeye çalışan TESEV’in de danışmanıdır.

    Hayri Erdoğan Alkin, Moon’un kurduğu PWPA’nın yayınlarına yansıyan bilgiye göre, PWPA’nın Avrupa toplantılarına katılmıştır. Yine Boğaziçi Üniversitesi’nden Handan Kepir Sinangil de, Avrupa toplantılarına katılmıştır. Anımsanacağı gibi, Hayri Erdoğan Alkin’in oğlu ARI Derneği kurucuları arasında yer almıştır.

    Moon’un 1000’i aşkın kuruluşlarından en ilginci olan Global image Association bir zaman­lar Türkiye’nin “lobi” işlerini üstlenmiştir. Ve milyonlarca dolar karşılığı ülkemizi dünya’ya tanıtmıştır.

    “Moon” culuk ve “Mason”lukla Atatürkçülük uyuşur mu?

    1919 Haziran’ın da Anadolu’nun doğusunda bir Ermeni devleti kurulmasını sağlayamayan ABD, Gümrü Anlaşmasıyla Türkiye’nin doğu sınırlarının da güvence altına alınması ve Sakarya boyunca Yunan saldırısının da püskürtülmesi üzerine, İstiklal Savaşı’nın Ankara’daki Milli Yönetim’in lehinde sonuçlanacağını hesap etmiş ol­malı ki, İngilizlerin silahlı istilâ planlarına karşılık kaleyi içerden fet­hetmek için sinsice isteklerde bulunmaya başlamıştı. ABD, elbette bu mandaçılığın peşini bırakmayacaktı.

    Nitekim, savaş ortamında yurdumuzun düştüğü zayıflıktan yararlanmak için Öksüzler Yurdu ve örnek çiftlikler kurarak, ABD Anadolu’da yerleşmek istemiş ve bu isteği Ankara’ya iletmişti. Meclis Başkanı Mustafa Kemal, hemen İçişleri Bakanlığı’na bir muhtıra yollayarak uyarıda bulunmuştu. Bu muhtırayı okuyalım:

    Muhtıra

    Ankara Büyük Millet Meclisi Hükümeti, ülkenin bayındırlaşma­sına, öksüzlerin rahatlamasına, genel sağlık ve ekonomimizin düzeltilmesine yönelik girişim ve çalışmaları teşekkürle kabul eder.

    Ancak, bu konuda gerek uzak, gerek pek yakın geçmişte, bize oldukça pahalıya patlayan deneyimlere dayanarak bir takım kaygılarımızı açıklama gereği vardır.

    Şimdiye kadar ülkemizde ekonomik amaçlarla, politik ve bilim­sel çalışma  (yapan)  kurumlar ve yabancılar özellikle aşağıdaki amaçları izlemişlerdir:

    1- Ülkemizdeki çalışmalarından korkunç bir ekonomik ve politik kazanç sağlamak.  Bizim için en zararlı olanı bunlardır.

    2- Bir bölgede elde edecekleri ekonomik yetkiye (imtiyaza) da­yanarak o bölgenin sahibi olmaya çalışmak.

    Bu gibilerin ülkemizde bir daha çalışmalarına kesinlikle izin ve­rilmemesi kararlaştırılmıştır. Böyle yapmakla yalnız kendimize değil, bütün insanlığa olabildiğince büyük hizmet ettiğimize ina­nıyoruz. Dolayısıyla Genel Savaşı (Birinci Dünya Savaşı)’nı çı­karanlar, bu gibi amaçları izleyen paralı gruplar ve onlara alet olan politikacılardır:

    3- Ekonomik amaçla,  bilim ve insanlık (yararı) görüntüsü ile yurdumuza gelip, ilerde istila (işgal) hazırlamak için, etnik top­lulukları gerek hükümete, gerek birbirlerine karşı kışkırtmak. Bu gibiler hem 1. dünya savaşının hem ülkemizdeki korkunç katliamların düzenleyicileridir.

    4- Yurdumuzda, yalnız bilim ve insanlık amaçları ile çalışmakla birlikte, ruhlarında bulunan Hıristiyanlık duygusu nedeniyle, hemen Hıristiyan azınlıklarla ilişki kurmak ve ister kasıtlı, ister kasıtsız olarak, aralarında azınlıkların da yaşamakta olduğu Müslüman topluluklardan ayrılma isteğini propaganda etmek ve kışkırtmak.

     Bu gibilerin gerek Müslümanlara, gerek iyiliğine çalıştıkları (nı ileri sürdükleri) Hıristiyan azınlıklara, aralarında yaşamakta ol­dukları İslâm çoğunluğuna (karşı) baskı yapılmasını aşılamakla, ne denli insanlık dışı bir biçimde çalıştıkları ve bu yüzden mey­dana gelen cinayetlerden sorumlu oldukları ortadadır.

    Hükümetlerimiz bu gibilerin de özgürce çalışmalarına izin ver­diğinde Müslüman ve Müslüman olmayan bütün uyruklarına karşı pek ağır bir sorumluluk yükü altına girmiş bulunacaktır.

    Buna izin vermek, çocukları yaşayacakları çevreye düşman ya da hiç olmazsa yabancı olarak yetiştirmek ve (çocukları) yaşa­yacakları çevre ile çatışmak zorunda bırakmaktır. Bu ise, gerek o çocukların, gerek içerisinde yaşayacakları halkın yıkımını hazırlamaktır.

    Bunu yasaklamak hükümetin görevidir.

    Bundan dolayıdır ki,  Amerikalılarca örnek çiftlik vb kurumlar kurup,  buralarda kendi uyruğumuzdan olan binlerce çocuğun Türk hükümetine ve ulusuna karşı sevgisiz ve uyumsuz duygu­larla yetişmelerine izin veremeyiz.[19]
    Mustafa Kemal,  muhtırasını,  diplomatik bir dille sürdürür ve Amerikalıların kurmak istedikleri örnek çiftliklerin yönetiminin ve çalışan çocukların eğitiminin Türk hükümetinin atayacağı görevlilerce yürütülmesi, bu gibi yerlerde çalışacak. Öksüzler arasında soy, mezhep ayrımı yapılamayacağı gibi şartlarını belirterek, diplomatik bir tavırla reddeder. Onun duyarlılıkla ve devlet adamı sorumluluğuyla ayrımcılığa ve karıştırıcılığa gösterdiği bu tepkisinde söz ettiği acı deneyler arasında Osmanlı yönetiminin ve İttihatçı mason hükümetlerin vurdumduymazlıkla izin verdiği Anadolu illerindeki Amerikan konsolosluklarının: Hıristiyan azınlıkları ve özellikle Ermenileri eğiten misyoner okulları kurmaları, azınlıklara birer ABD pasaportu vererek onları Amerikanlaştırmaları ve misyoner okullarını, manastırları silah deposu haline getirmeleri ve sonunda terör eylemleri ve devlete isyan girişimleri bulunmaktadır.

    Osmanlı’nın son döneminde ittihat terakkici’lerinde desteği ile yabancıların işlettiği okul sayısı, 98’dir. Bu işi yalnızca savaş öncesi durumun bir özelliği olarak göstermek de yanıltmanın bir parçasıdır. Mustafa Kemal’in Amerikan okullarının yıkıcı etkisini bilmemesi düşünülemez. Amerikalıla­rın Talaş Koleji’nde 1880 yılı ders programında, Ermenice ve Rum­ca Gramer, Osmanlıca İncil, Hristiyanlara göre tarih derslerinin ya­nı sıra Amerikalıların 3 ayrı yerdeki matbaada, Ermenice, Rumca, Bulgarca, İtalyanca, Ladion (İspanyol Yahudi dili) dillerinde, kitap yayınladıkları bilinmektedir.

    Mustafa Kemal, kültürel işgalin sonuçlarını iyi değerlendirmektedir. Sözde öksüzler yurdu kurma gibi insancıl girişimin altındaki azınlık örgütleme plânının yattığını elbette biliyordu. 1922 yılı başında, ülke işgal altındayken ve en zor koşullarda yaşanırken yazıl­mış olan bu muhtıradaki değerlendirmeye “komplo teorisi” diyebi­lecek bir kişi olabilir mi?

    Buna “komplo uydurması” diyenler, Reagan’ın 1982’de koyduğu adla “demokrasi projesi” nin Yugoslavya’da, Çekoslovakya’da, Bal­kanlarda, Asya’da, Afrika’da, Orta ve Güney Amerika’da, Irak’ta, Venezuela’da yol açtığı sonuçlan unutsa da, bunların Türkiye’deki etnik ve dinsel kışkırtmalarını Lozan’ın yeniden gözden geçirilmesi dayatmalarını yok sayması mümkün değildir.

    Mustafa Kemal’in, 27 Aralık 1919’da yabancılarla yatıp kalkan­lara verdiği şu yanıtı okuyunca; Bugün Atatürk’cü geçinen ABD uşaklarına ve AB aşıklarına şaşmamak elde midir?

    Şimdi bir kez daha Mustafa Kemal’i dinleyelim:

    Tekrar ediyorum, aleyhimizde ileri sürülen değerlendirmeler yanlıştır. Bu gerçek, (hem) tarih, (hem de) mantık açısından sa­bittir. Bu hususu, yalnız Batı’ya değil, hatta vatandaşlarımıza da, ehemmiyetli bir surette ihtar etmek gereğini duyuyorum. Çünkü ender de olsa, üzülerek işitiyoruz ki, milletin tarihini okumamış veya milli duygudan yoksun kalmış olan bazı kişiler, yabancıların, aleyhimizde ileri sürdükleri suçlamaları reddetmedikleri gibi vatanını ve milletini kusurlu göstermekten de çekinmiyorlar. Bugün bile, sultani mektebinin salonlarını aley­himizde konferans verdirmek için yabancılara açanlar var.

    Bu gibilere lanet”

    ——————————————————————————–
    [1] Graham Fuller / Siyasal İslam’ın geleceği / Sh:220-223 / Timaş Yayınları

    [2] Graham Fuller / Siyasal İslam’ın geleceği / Sh:214 / Timaş Yayınları

    [3] Aydınlık / 05 Eylül 2004

    [4] Prizma.2 / Sh:12-13 /

    [5] Asrın Getirdiği Tereddütler / T.O.V yayınları / Sh. 200 ve 4. Sayfa/

    [6] Nevval Sevindi / A.g.y – Sh:39

    [7] Prof. Alpaslan Işıklı / Sh:85 /

    [8] Fetullah Gülen / F.F / C:2 / Sh:212

    [9] Nevval Sevindi / A.g.y. Sh.39

    [10] M. Emin Değer / Bir Cumhuriyet Düşmanı / Sh:283

    [11] Fetullah gülen / Papa’ya Mektup / 09 Şubat 1998 /

    [12] Akşam  / Güler Kömürcü / 24 Eylül 2004

    [13] Milliyet / 02 Eylül 1997

    [14] Sivil Örümceğin Ağında / Mustafa yıldırım / 3. Baskı / Sh: 520

    [15] Sivil Örümceğin Ağında / Mustafa yıldırım / 3. Baskı / Sh: 512-523/

    [16] Yankı / Ağustos Sh:30

    [17] Zaman / 09 07 2003

    [18] “Pamukkale’de sabah ayini” / Gündem (Denizli) / 24 Haziran 2002

    [19] Mustafa Kemal’in el yazması ile Muhtıra/Belge no: 1125 / ADP: Cilt 1, Sh:384; Mustafa Onar, Atatürk’ün Kurtuluş Savaşı Yazışmaları II, T.C. Kültür Bakanlığı Atatürk Dizisi, Ankara 1995

    – Bak: Sivil Örümceğin Ağında / Mustafa Yıldırım / Sh:564-568 / 3. Basım