Tag: energy security

  • Turkey takes a big leap forward over energy security

    Turkey takes a big leap forward over energy security

    AD20130325958469-Importing_Kurdi

    Robin Mills

    Last month I wrote how Turkey needed to rebuild constructive relations with its energy-rich neighbours. Two dramatic announcements later, and it seems to have done just that.

    Topic Turkey

    But big obstacles still lie in the way of improving Turkish energy security: Baghdad, a Mediterranean island, and the Kremlin.

    On Thursday, Abdullah Öcalan, the leader of the PKK Kurdish separatist organisation, called a ceasefire. This capped years of cautious negotiations between Mr Öcalan, in jail since 1999, and the Turkish government.

    On Friday, the Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu apologised on the phone to his Turkish counterpart, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, for the death of nine Turks in the 2010 storming of a ship that was taking aid to Gaza.

    And a week ago, dramatic happenings on the island of Cyprus: the terms of the European Union-led bank bailout required depositors to pay a 10 per cent levy, triggering anger and frantic last-minute negotiations.

    What is the energy significance of these events? They may open routes for two of the most exciting current oil and gas discoveries to reach markets, enhancing Turkey’s economy and energy security on the way. The Turks need gas in particular to fuel their growing economy, that has become too dependent on Russia and on supplies from Iran threatened by sanctions and winter disruptions.

    The 29-year insurgency waged by the PKK in south-east Turkey may be nearing its end. The Kurds of Syria have largely thrown off central government control. The Syrian Kurds have balanced ambiguously between the president Bashar Al Assad’s government and the Syrian opposition, and gaining leverage over them has become urgent for Ankara.

    Under Mr Erdogan, Turkey has developed increasingly close economic links with the autonomous Kurdish region of Iraq, where international companies have found major oil and gasfields.

    But independent Kurdish oil and gas sales are blocked by Iraqi government policy, and relations between Baghdad and the Kurdish regional authorities in Erbil have deteriorated sharply.

    Permitting direct large-scale exports would require the Turks to take the dramatic step of breaking with the Iraq central government. For now, this is a pipeline too far – but a solution to the Kurdish dispute surely brings an Ankara-Baghdad showdown closer.

    Meanwhile, in the eastern Mediterranean, Israel has found some 30 trillion cubic feet of gas, enough to supply it for the next 80 years. Cyprus has also discovered a major field, and Lebanon is launching exploration this year.

    Mr Netanyahu’s apology to Mr Erdogan adds to recent rumours of discussions over a pipeline. This is probably the cheapest way for Israeli gas to get to Turkey and Europe – and would help to rebuild a key regional alliance for Tel Aviv.

    But Israel’s route to Turkey is blocked by Lebanon – with whom it is technically at war – and Cyprus, divided between Greek and Turkish Cypriots.

    Turkey disputes the right of the internationally recognised Republic of Cyprus to explore for gas, in the absence of a political settlement.

    When the deposit haircut was announced, the Cypriot government offered to compensate savers with “gas bonds” backed by future revenue from its hoped-for offshore gas fields.

    The idea then emerged for Russia’s Gazprombank, loosely linked to its state gas giant Gazprom, to offer its own bailout, in return for stakes in those fields. This would allow the Kremlin to defeat, divert or delay a threat to its market dominance.

    Turkey has opposed the use of Cypriot gas to pay such compensation. But to make use of the thaw with Israel, and access Mediterranean gas, Mr Erdogan will have to replicate his Kurdish rapprochement with Cyprus. Foreign governments may be lesser obstacles to Turkish energy security than domestic nationalists.

     

    Robin Mills is the head of consulting at Manaar Energy, and the author of The Myth of the Oil Crisis and Capturing Carbon

    via Turkey takes a big leap forward over energy security – The National.

  • Nabucco Intergovernmental Agreement Signed in Ankara

    Nabucco Intergovernmental Agreement Signed in Ankara

    Nabucco Intergovernmental Agreement Signed in Ankara

    Publication: Eurasia Daily Monitor Volume: 6 Issue: 134
    July 14, 2009
    By: Saban Kardas
    On July 13 the Nabucco transit countries removed an important obstacle for the strategic pipeline project. Attending a high profile meeting hosted by Turkey, the prime ministers of Austria, Bulgaria, Hungary, Romania and Turkey inked the Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA). The ceremony was also attended by several government officials and representatives of international organizations including the Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili, the E.U. Commission’s President Jose Manuel Barroso, E.U. Energy Commissioner Andris Piebalgs and the U.S. special envoy for Eurasian energy Richard Morningstar (Anadolu Ajansi, July 13).

    In the next step toward the completion of the legal framework, the Nabucco consortium will sign separate project support agreements with the five participating countries within the next six months. Construction work is expected to start by 2011 and the pipeline will be operational in 2014. The consortium will also open discussions with banks to raise the necessary capital and explore the marketing of transportation capacities. The project is valued at 7.9 billion Euros ($11 billion) and in its full capacity it will pump 31 billion cubic meters (bcm) of gas annually to European markets (www.nabucco-pipeline.com).

    According to the Nabucco consortium, the “IGA will lay out a stable legal framework for the next 50 years and … 50 percent of the pipeline’s capacity will be reserved for the shareholders and the remaining 50 percent offered to third-party shippers.” Moreover, the IGA will develop a standard tariff methodology. The legal framework set by the IGA will remain in force for 25 years after the pipeline becomes operational so that it provides “strong comfort to the potential gas supply countries who are considering selling gas to the shippers of Nabucco” (www.nabucco-pipeline.com, July 13).

    The partners do not expect financing to become a major issue. The meeting signaled a possible imminent resolution over the uncertainty about securing gas to feed the Nabucco pipeline. Thus far, Azerbaijan is the only producer to commit gas to the project and it has promoted Nabucco as a strategic priority. Ahead of the signing ceremony, the head of SOCAR, Rovnag Abdullayev, reiterated support for Nabucco and maintained that Azerbaijan has enough reserves to supply alternative projects (Anadolu Ajansi, July 11).

    Turkmenistan’s President Gurbanguly Berdimuhamedov expressed his readiness to export gas through Nabucco (Zaman, July 12). Representatives from Iraq, Egypt and Syria also attended the signing ceremony and pledged to pump their gas through the Nabucco once it is completed. Al-Maliki said that Iraq could start supplying 17 bcm annually to Europe by 2017 (Today’s Zaman, July 14).

    Turkish officials continuously emphasized that the project is open to other potential suppliers if they wish to join. Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan reiterated Turkey’s position that Nabucco does not necessarily exclude Russia and Iran, and maintained that Qatar might also join the project.

    Although Turkey has consistently expressed its interest in integrating Iran into the project, given recent political developments, this alternative currently appears unlikely. Matthew Bryza, the U.S. deputy assistant secretary of state for European and Eurasian affairs, did not rule out possible Russian participation in the project, but he expressed the Obama administration’s uneasiness over any effort to include Iran (Hurriyet Daily News, July 13). Nonetheless, given Moscow’s objections to Nabucco and the lack of Russian participation in the IGA ceremony, it remains to be seen how feasible that alternative will be.

    Reinhard Mitschek, Nabucco CEO, said that in the first phase, the main suppliers will be Azerbaijan and Iraq and that Turkmen gas will be accessed in the second phase. He maintained that the market prognoses showed a greater demand from buyers than initially expected (Anadolu Ajansi, July 13).

    Turkey expects to receive many benefits from the project. The transit countries will not raise fees, but will share the tax revenues proportionate to the length of the pipeline passing through their territories. Ankara projects obtaining 60 percent of the tax revenues, amounting to 450 million Euros ($630 million) annually. Moreover, the project will bring infrastructure investments to Turkey and create new jobs (Radikal, July 11). Most importantly, Turkey hailed the project as a significant development, which reaffirms its strategic value to the West. Through closer cooperation in energy security, Ankara hopes to cement its ties with the E.U. and remove the remaining obstacles to membership. Speaking at the ceremony, Erdogan and Barroso defined this new cooperation as a strategic bond and expressed their desire to see Nabucco further bolstering Turkey-E.U. ties.

    Nonetheless, although Turkey previously sought to link the Nabucco project to E.U. accession and implied that progress might be conditional on the E.U. opening the energy chapter, this remains unresolved. Another potential area of uncertainty relates to whether Turkey secured its request for a 15 percent lift-off. The international press reported that Turkey might have dropped this demand. Asked about this ahead of the ceremony, the Energy Minister Taner Yildiz gave only vague answers. Yildiz said that Ankara was granted other guarantees to ensure its supply security. He indicated that Turkey might bid for the 50 percent of the gas allocated for the transport countries and added that talks with other governments and corporations on this subject will continue.

    Moreover, he suggested that the pipeline will be built to enable the transportation of gas in both directions between east and west, in order that Turkey can cope with any unexpected winter shortages through swapping gas (www.ntvmsnbc.com, July 12). While Yildiz implicitly acknowledged that Turkey might have retreated from its position on the 15 percent issue, the head of the state-run gas company, BOTAS, ruled out that Turkey had abandoned its claim. “When the project support agreement is signed such details will be discussed there… This issue is still on the table: there is no sacrifice involved,” Saltuk Duzyol added (ANKA, July 13).

    The signing of the IGA marks a major step forward. However, such remarks, as well as the ongoing standoff in Turkish-Azeri price renegotiation talks, are indicative of the heavy bargaining that lies ahead.

    https://jamestown.org/program/nabucco-intergovernmental-agreement-signed-in-ankara/

  • Turkey Adopts a More Cooperative Position on Nabucco

    Turkey Adopts a More Cooperative Position on Nabucco

    Turkey Adopts a More Cooperative Position on Nabucco

    Publication: Eurasia Daily Monitor Volume: 6 Issue: 94
    May 15, 2009
    By: Saban Kardas
    According to a senior EU official a new deal has been struck between Turkey and the EU paving the way to sign the intergovernmental agreement for the Nabucco project in Ankara on June 25. The breakthrough was reportedly made possible by Turkey dropping its uncompromising negotiating position and offering an unconditional acceptance of the EU’s terms. In particular, Turkey relinquished its demand to purchase 15 percent of the gas transit at discounted prices (The Guardian, May 11). Although positive statements emerged from the EU summit in Prague last week, lending credibility to this report, the Turkish side has rebuffed claims that a concrete deal has been reached.

    In response to questions about the story in the U.K. newspaper the Guardian, the Minister of Energy and Natural Resources Taner Yildiz, ruled out such a deal: “We should not interpret this [story] as yes or no… Negotiations are still under way.” Yildiz added that President Abdullah Gul was in charge of conducting the negotiations for the intergovernmental agreement, and he was not aware of any date being set on signing the agreement (Referans, May 12).

    One Turkish daily cited an unnamed BOTAS official who refuted the claim that Turkey had abandoned its demand for 15 percent. The same source claimed that Turkey’s demand does not directly relate to the consortium building the Nabucco pipeline, and the negotiations on Nabucco would continue in May (Yeni Safak, May 13). Before departing for Baku, Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan reacted to these reports, and added that the process remains ongoing (www.aktifhaber.com, May 13).

    Although it remains unclear whether a finalized deal on the negotiations is imminent, it is certain that positive developments in the Nabucco project have occurred. Senior Turkish officials familiar with the negotiations, speaking on the condition of anonymity, confirmed that groundbreaking progress had been achieved -though denying reports that all the conditions or a date had been agreed. In particular, Turkey wants a clause inserted into the intergovernmental agreement to allay its concerns and protect its energy security. “The Turkish side is hopeful that the issue will be solved at the end of the two rounds of discussions before the end of May, leaving enough time for preparations for the signing ceremony” (Hurriyet Daily News, May 13).

    Technical developments appear to be equally positive. Following the Prague summit, the Nabucco consortium announced that engineering teams from the partner countries have launched detailed engineering work on the pipeline route (Milliyet, May 13). A more promising sign is the recent change in the management of Turkey’s energy policies, following the Cabinet reshuffle earlier this month. This has raised expectations that stronger political leadership will ensure avoiding earlier mistakes. Turkey’s hard bargaining position and its misguided policies were considered to be an effort to stall or delay the conclusion of the Nabucco project (EDM, April 24, 27). Inside Turkey, this problematic policy is now increasingly attributed to Turkey’s former energy minister Hilmi Guler, whose insistence on making Turkey an energy hub created a stalemate in the negotiations with the Nabucco partners (Sabah, May 14).

    In addition to the appointment of a new energy minister, Taner Yildiz, who is considered more competent on energy policy, recent developments indicate that President Gul and Prime Minister Erdogan are paying closer attention to Turkey’s energy policies. Moreover, it is argued that since the foreign ministry has increasingly become part of the negotiations, a more realistic stance has been adopted in Turkey’s energy policies (Hurriyet Daily News, May 13). Erdogan and Gul’s political leadership and their high profile involvement might boost Turkey’s credibility and facilitate the conclusion of the Nabucco process.

    Gul represented Turkey at the EU energy summit in Prague last week, which followed his attendance at an earlier summit in Sofia in April. In Prague, he tried to reassure the Nabucco partners of Turkey’s reliability by emphasizing how much Ankara was aware of its responsibilities in the transportation of Caspian and Middle Eastern hydrocarbon resources to Europe. Noting that Turkey acted responsibly in the management of other pipelines on its territory Gul added, “we will demonstrate the same sense of responsibility, even more, in the case of the Southern Gas Corridor and Nabucco, which are of higher strategic importance. Turkey has the highest level of determination and political will to realize the Nabucco project.” Gul noted that Turkey’s energy policy is based on harmonizing its own search for diversifying its suppliers and transportation routes with the EU’s attempts to ensure energy security (Hurriyet, May 9).

    Erdogan is actively complementing the perspective outlined by Gul. Energy related issues constituted a major part of Erdogan’s portfolio during his recent trip to Baku (EDM, May 14). Yildiz said that Ankara and Baku will continue their negotiations on prices for Azeri gas flowing through Turkey (Milliyet, May 15). Erdogan then visited Poland where he delivered an important message on Turkey’s position over energy transportation. He said that “Turkey is a transit and consumer country… As a transit country, we will always be ready to render our help available to Nabucco: there is no doubt on that. The route and diversification of supplies are very important. Turkey is pursuing a cooperative approach on all of these issues” (Cihan Haber Ajansi, May 14).

    Gul and Erdogan’s recent statements suggest that Turkey might be revising its policy of asserting itself as an energy hub at the expense of producer countries and end users. Instead, it is using its position as a transit country as leverage to request additional concessions. Thus, the Turkish leadership is sending signals that it has adopted a more realistic role in Nabucco, which might provide a solid basis to achieve a common position between Turkey and the EU in energy cooperation. Though they continue to emphasize Turkey’s search for security as part of its new energy policy, they are being more careful not to exaggerate their demands.
    https://jamestown.org/program/turkey-adopts-a-more-cooperative-position-on-nabucco/