Tag: Davos

  • World Economic Forums not to take place in Davos any more

    World Economic Forums not to take place in Davos any more

    World Economic Forums not to take place in Davos any more

    50425Baku, Fineko/abc.az. The World Economic Forum (WEF) is changing its format due to changes happening in the world.

    The sources close to WEF report that World Economic Forum will no longer be held in Davos.

    “The new place for holding these forums will become Istanbul. At that terms of the forums will also change- now they will be held in the 4th quarter of each year “, -the source said. The format of the forum will also change.

    “Now they will be not economic but engineer-economic forums which is a recognition of new technologies’ decisive role for development of world economy”,- it was said.

    The engineer part of the forum will focus on construction sector , both industrial and civil construction.

    “That is connected with the fact that presently 63% of global capital expenditures falls on the share of infrastructural projects”,- the source noted.

    via Azerbaijan Business Center – World Economic Forums not to take place in Davos any more.

  • Davos may hold summit in Turkey

    Davos may hold summit in Turkey

    Davos may hold summit in Turkey

    davos

    Turkish EU minister said, “our prime minister earlier said he would not go to Davos. Now Davos told us that ‘we can come to Turkey.”

    Turkish EU minister said on Tuesday that Klaus Schwab, founder and executive chairman of the World Economic Forum, told Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan that they were eager to hold a summit in Istanbul.

    Replying to a question on meeting between Erdogan and Schwab in Istanbul, EU Minister and chief negotiator for EU talks Egemen Bagis said, “Schwab said they are eager to hold a summit in Istanbul in which the East and the West as well as the North and the South will meet. He asked Erdogan’s permission on this matter. Erdogan told Schwab that you can work on a draft program, then we will review it.”

    “Our prime minister earlier said he would not go to Davos. Now Davos told us that ‘we can come to Turkey’,” he said.

    AA

     

  • Hillary Clinton: “The ball is in Turkey’s field”

    Hillary Clinton: “The ball is in Turkey’s field”

    Democrats are in serious trouble. They need every vote they can get in November so that is why they are posturing around.
    I would like to see the day when Turkey can care less and shrug off  the American and Armenian clamors, resolutions etc  about this farce of genocide.
    Turkey and Azerbaijan should unite more and defy this idiotic nonsense..
    Almost 80 million Turks being manipulated by a 2 million weakling nation and its masters in Washington…Disgusting….

    .. Oya Bain [oyabain@gmail.com]

    ———————————————————————————————————————————————————

    Armenia’s April decision was impressive and praiseworthy. U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton declared at a joint press conference with Armenian Foreign Minister Edward Nalbandyan today in Yerevan, when speaking about Armenian side’s decision to suspend the process of ratification of the Armenia-Turkey Protocols.

    Speaking about the Armenian-Turkish normalization process Hillary Clinton reminded that she personally attended the ceremony of signing the Protocols. “It was a brave decision by the two Presidents aimed at complete normalization of relations,” Secretary of State mentioned meanwhile expressing concern over their non-fulfillment.

    “You know that the signed documents have not been fulfilled yet, and there are some problems. I am happy that irrespective of the difficulties coming, certainly, from Turkey, Armenia is ready to continue the process,” Hillary Clinton declared. She mentioned that under the circumstances Armenia’s decision was impressive and praiseworthy, and they appreciate Armenia’s readiness to continue the process.

    Using football terminology Secretary of State concluded: “The ball is now in Turkey’s field.” She also added that the American side also encourages Turkey to undertake some steps.

    Source: Panor

    ===============================================================================

    Clinton: The Ball is in Turkey’s Field

    Monday, 05 July 2010 16:20

    Armenia’s April decision was impressive and praiseworthy, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton declared at a joint press conference with Armenian Foreign Minister Edward Nalbandian in Yerevan, when speaking about Armenian side’s decision to suspend the process of ratification of the Armenia-Turkey Protocols.

    Speaking about the Armenian-Turkish normalization process Hillary Clinton reminded that she personally attended the ceremony of signing the Protocols. “It was a brave decision by the two Presidents aimed at complete normalization of relations,” Secretary of State mentioned meanwhile expressing concern over their non-fulfillment.

    “You know that the signed documents have not been fulfilled yet, and there are some problems. I am happy that irrespective of the difficulties coming, certainly, from Turkey, Armenia is ready to continue the process,” Hillary Clinton declared. She mentioned that under the circumstances Armenia’s decision was impressive and praiseworthy, and they appreciate Armenia’s readiness to continue the process.

    Using football terminology Secretary of State concluded: “The ball is now in Turkey’s field.” She also added that the American side also encourages Turkey to undertake some steps.

    US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said that the US believes that the Armenian-Turkish normalization will bring peace, stability and prosperity to the region. The steps taken to this end will contribute to the normalization of relations between the two states, said Hillary Clinton during a joint briefing with Armenian Foreign Minister Edward Nalbandian in Yerevan.

    “Though the Protocols have not been ratified yet, but President Sargsyan stated that Armenia is ready to continue talks with Turkey as soon as it makes a step forward, and we hail this statement. The US agrees with this point of view, and we estimate positively the Armenian leadership’s statement,” stressed Clinton.

    For his part, Edward Nalbandian noted that Armenia is ready for a dialogue with Turkey without preconditions as soon as Ankara is ready for it.

    ‘Despite the fact that Turks were, and remain unready to establish relations with Armenia without preconditions, it is very important for us to feel the attitude of the US administration on the matter,’ RA President Serzh Sargsyan said during the meeting with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.  He also expressed gratitude to President Barack Obama and the Secretary of State for their attempts to normalize Armenian-Turkish relations.

    In her turn, Hillary Clinton thanked the Armenian leader for his personal contribution to the improvement of relations with Turkey.

    News.am, PanARMENIAN.Net,  Panorama.am

  • Wait and See Game for Turkey’s Enforcement of UN Sanctions on Iran

    Wait and See Game for Turkey’s Enforcement of UN Sanctions on Iran

    Dorian Jones | IstanbuL

    21 June 2010

    ahmedinajad erdogan 17may10 480 eng 300 eng

    Photo: AFP

    Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad flashes the V-sign for victory as Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan looks on after the Islamic republic inked a nuclear fuel swap deal in Tehran (File Photo – 17 May 2010)

    Related Articles

    • Turkey Troops, Kurdish Rebels Clash Near Iraq Border
    • US Defense Secretary: Europe Pushing Turkey ‘Eastward’
    • Israel Moves to Repair Relations With Turkey

    This month, Turkey voted against the United Nations Security Council’s fourth round of sanctions against Iran. With Turkey’s Islamic rooted government increasing its economic ties with Iran in the past few years, fears are arising that the pivotal Western ally is in danger of swinging eastward because of resistance in Europe to its bid for membership of the European Union.

    Despite growing international tensions over Iran’s nuclear energy program, the Turkish government has forged ahead with energy deals with Iran, expanding its dependency on energy with the nation.

    These deals put Turkey in a precarious situation: to enforce or not to enforce the UN sanctions imposed on its neighbor Iran.

    Turkey has long been seen as a bridge between East and West. But its belief that sanctions are ineffective and that there are dangers in pushing the Islamic republic into a corner is likely to change its relationship with Western nations.

    Earlier this month Turkish foreign minister Ahmet Davutoglu expressed concern over the existing sanctions against Iran.

    AP

    “Turkey and Iran’s trade volume is around $10 billion,” he says. “And it can rise to $30 billion if sanctions are lifted.”

    Iran’s energy resources are seen as important by Ankara to break its dependency on Russian energy.

    Iran expert Gokhan Cetinsayar of Sehir University says that in addition to its dependency on gas, there are other trade initiatives with Iran that are economically key to Turkey.

    “75,000 trucks going on between Turkey and Iran every year,” said Cetinsayar. “Now there are energy deals. You know how important the Iranian natural gas and all other agreements and initiatives are economically important for Turkey.

    With large families usually depending for their livelihoods on cargo trucks, its estimated as many a million Turkish people depend on Iranian trade.

    With its increasing economic ties with Iran, there are growing fears that Turkey will balk at enforcing the UN sanctions against Iran.

    Turkish foreign minister spokesman Burak Ozugergin says Turkey has already paid a heavy economic price for UN policies with another of its neighbors, Iraq.

    “At the beginning of the 90’s, the Turkish volume of trade with Iraq was around the 15 to 20 percent mark of our total volume of trade. The next year, after the imposition of sanctions, this trickled down to almost zero,” said Ozugergin. “Money is not everything. But at least if it did work then we might be able to say to our public, ‘look it was for a good a cause.’ But can we really honestly say that looking back? For Iran again we don’t think it will help to solve the nuclear issue and perhaps may work against it.”

    The new sanctions on Iran are expected to cut into the present $10 billion trade volume. It could possibly undermine its energy policy as well. But political scientist Nuray Mert of Istanbul University say some western nations may now not be able to depend on Turkey.

    “I was inclined to think that at the end of the day Turkey will join the club when it comes to realization of these sanctions,” she said. “But nowadays I can see the government is planning to avoid these sanctions. Because now we have Turkey signing a lot of economic agreements, against the policy of sanctions.”

    For now Turkey has remained circumspect over enforcing new sanctions. One foreign ministry official said “you will have to wait and see.” Analysts say Iran would probably reward any breaking of sanctions with lucrative energy deals. But the political cost could be high because of Turkey’s aspirations for joining the EU. The coming weeks will see Ankara facing a difficult a choice.

  • Turkey’s Hollow Prize

    Turkey’s Hollow Prize

    pic

    Freedom’s Edge

    Turkey’s Hollow Prize

    Claudia Rosett, 06.18.10, 11:21 AM EDT

    Washington’s Woodrow Wilson Center dishonors its own public service award.

    Canada Free Press
    June 19 2010

    By Claudia Rosett Friday, June 18, 2010
    – Forbes

    It’s time Congress pulled the plug on Washington’s taxpayer-subsidized
    Woodrow Wilson Center for International Scholars, which has turned
    itself into a global joke. With Turkey’s leaders coquetting as the new
    best bedfellows of Iran and embracing the terrorists of Hamas, the
    Wilson Center has just bestowed its `Public Service’ award on Turkey’s
    foreign minister, Ahmet Davutoglu.

    In tandem with rewarding Davutoglu for catalyzing `the development of
    Turkey’s foreign relations,’ the Wilson Center also honored a Turkish
    business tycoon, Ferit Sahenk, with its Woodrow Wilson Award for
    Corporate Citizenship. The two winners received their prizes at a
    banquet held Thursday evening at the plush Four Seasons Hotel in
    Istanbul.

    In a June 8 press release the Wilson Center’s president, former
    congressman Lee Hamilton, explained that Davutoglu and Sahenk had been
    chosen because `These two leaders personify the attributes we seek to
    honor at the Woodrow Wilson Center.’ I mean no insult to Sahenk’whose
    prizeworthy business skills I don’t question’but it’s hard to escape
    the conclusion that the chief attributes the Wilson Center has just
    sought to honor in Istanbul are antagonism toward American values
    (Davutoglu) and enormous amounts of money (Sahenk).

    Created in 1968 by an act of Congress, the Wilson Center describes
    itself on its website as a `nonpartisan institute,’ a `living,
    national memorial’ to President Woodrow Wilson, charged with
    `symbolizing and strengthening the fruitful relations between the
    world of learning and the world of public affairs.’ Functioning as a
    `public-private partnership,’ the Wilson Center in recent times has
    been receiving roughly one-third of its yearly operating funds from
    the U.S. government (in other words, from U.S. taxpayers). Thus
    credentialed by Congress and anchored in federal subsidies, it
    attracts the rest of its money from a global array of public and
    private sources. Its current annual expenses are budgeted at more than
    $37.3 million.

    Housed on prime real estate, just blocks from the White House, the
    Wilson Center occupies, ironically enough, a lavishly appointed
    eight-story wing of the Ronald Reagan International Trade Building. It
    has a big vestibule with polished granite and marble floors, some of
    Wilson’s words chiseled in stone, and multiple levels of roomy offices
    and meeting rooms, ample armchairs, a cafeteria and a private library.
    All this is supposed to serve the Center’s aim `to shed the light of
    the timeless on the timely.’

    >From this perch, with atrocious timing, the Wilson Center last August
    invited Davutoglu to receive its public service award this June, `in
    recognition of his lifelong service to the Turkish public.’

    This is a bizarre spin on Davutoglu’s major role in steering the
    Turkish state away from its former democratic allies such as the U.S.
    and Israel and toward its current collaboration with the tyrannies of
    Syria and Iran, and the Iranian-backed terrorists of Hamas. Author of
    a treatise titled `Strategic Depth,’ proposing a sweeping rethink of
    Turkish policy, Davutoglu has been a core player in Turkey’s
    increasingly anti-Western slant since Prime Minister Recep Tayyip
    Erdogan and his Islamic AK Party won power in 2002. In May 2009
    Davutoglu became foreign minister. Since then, Turkey’s shift toward
    Iran has achieved warp speed.

    In recent weeks Turkey’s leaders have backed a flotilla led by a
    terror-linked Turkish foundation, IHH, aiming to break Israel’s
    blockade against weapons reaching Iranian-backed terrorists in Gaza.
    Last month Turkey tried to deflect new sanctions on Iran, partnering
    in Tehran on a farcical uranium swap proposal with Brazil’s President
    Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva (winner last year of the Wilson Public
    Service award) and Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (candidate for
    next year’s Wilson award?). This month, in the United Nations Security
    Council, Turkey, along with Brazil, spurned the U.S. and voted against
    new sanctions on Iran.

    In all this Davutoglu has been a prime player, at one point likening
    the deaths of eight weapons-wielding Turkish `peace activists’ in the
    terror-linked Gaza flotilla to the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks that
    killed thousands of innocents in the U.S.

    These were just some of the offenses cited by Rep. Gary Ackerman (D.,
    N.Y.), chairman of the House Subcommittee on the Middle East and South
    Asia, in a June 15 letter urging Lee Hamilton to rescind the Wilson
    Center award to Davutoglu. Describing Turkey’s foreign policy under
    Davutoglu as `rife with illegality, irresponsibility and hypocrisy,’
    Ackerman highlighted Turkey’s continuing denial of the 1915 Armenian
    genocide and its current backing for both the genocidal regime in
    Sudan and the Holocaust-denying regime in Iran.

    Apparently that’s all OK with the Wilson Center, where `our
    nonpartisan work’ seems headed these days toward the global surrender
    of any principles whatsoever. A press officer there explained in an
    email this week that `Awardees are not chosen for their political
    views.’

    But it seems they are sometimes chosen for their fundraising
    potential. On that score, the spokeswoman in the same e-mail wrote
    that `These Awards Dinners have been critical for helping to raise
    some of the funding the Wilson Center needs.’ She continued, `In 2009,
    the Center identified Istanbul as an international city where a
    fundraising event of this kind would be viable.’

    Davutoglu’s co-honoree in Istanbul Thursday evening, Ferit Sahenk,
    happens to be one of the wealthiest men in Turkey. Head of the Dogus
    Holding business conglomerate founded by his father, Sahenk shows up
    on the Forbes list of World Billionaires with a net worth of $2.1
    billion.

    With the Wilson Center giving Sahenk its Award for Corporate
    Citizenship, have Sahenk or any of his Turkish cohorts pledged money
    to the Wilson Center? When I asked that question of the Center on
    Thursday afternoon, apparently no one could say , despite 12
    `development’ workers listed on the staff. I was passed along to
    another spokeswoman, who said she would look into it, but `People have
    to jump through hoops to get this information.’

    The way the Wilson Center puts it, Congress has been urging them `to
    raise more funding from private sources.’ Another way of looking at
    it, however, is that with Congress continuing to pour in money, the
    Wilson Center has been able to leverage its congressionally created
    and subsidized status into an ability to raise additional tens of
    millions all over the map’but to keep growing, it wants yet more.
    Among the top donors listed in the Center’s 2008-09 annual report,
    chipping in amounts for that period ranging from $100,000 to $2.5
    million apiece, are several that are themselves funded by U.S. tax
    dollars. These include the U.S. Agency for International Development,
    the U.S. State Department and the United Nations Development Program
    (which receives hundreds of millions annually from the U.S.
    government).

    Other top donors include: George Soros’s Open Society Institute, the
    Carnegie Corporation of New York, the Pew Charitable Trusts, the Exxon
    Mobil Corporation, the Swedish Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the
    Embassy of Mexico, Brazil’s Grupo EBX , South Korea’s LG Electronics,
    the Fellowship Fund for Pakistan and `Anonymous.’ United Airlines is
    listed as `The Official and Exclusive Airline Sponsor of the Woodrow
    Wilson Awards and the Woodrow Wilson Center.’

    Now comes the Davutoglu award, with its message that the Wilson Center
    in bestowing its favors is willing to treat even the most flagrantly
    anti-American views (and deeds) as irrelevant, while collecting money
    around the globe. Why should Congress keep fueling this morally blank,
    misleading and venal exercise with millions of American tax dollars?

  • NEO-CONS AND GENOCIDE-DENYING CORRUPT LACKEY POLITICIANS SHOULD BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE

    NEO-CONS AND GENOCIDE-DENYING CORRUPT LACKEY POLITICIANS SHOULD BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE

    appo1
    By Appo Jabarian

    USA Armenian Life Magazine
    March 24, 2010

    In early March, the political wrangling between the righteous and
    corrupt politicians in Washington before, during and after the voting
    by the House Foreign affairs committee sparked a series of articles
    critical of genocide-denying corrupt U.S. politicians both in the
    House and the White House.

    In a 12 March article in Huffington Post, Stephen Zunes wrote that
    failure to acknowledge the genocide “is a tragic affront to the
    rapidly dwindling number of genocide survivors as well as their
    descendents. It’s also a disservice to the many Turks who opposed
    the Ottoman Empire’s policies and tried to stop the genocide, as
    well as the growing number of Turks today who face imprisonment by
    their U.S.-backed regime for daring to publicly concede the crimes
    of their forebears. For example, Orhan Pamuk, the Turkish novelist
    who … was prosecuted and fled into exile to escape death threats
    after making a number of public references to the genocide.

    “Some opponents of the resolution argue that it is pointless for
    Congress to pass resolutions regarding historical events.

    Yet there were no such complaints regarding resolutions commemorating
    the Holocaust, nor are there normally complaints regarding the
    scores of dedicatory resolutions passed by Congress in recent years,”
    added Zunes.

    Opponents of the resolution also falsely argue that its passage by the
    Congress can harm the U.S.-Turkey relations. “The United States has
    done much greater harm in its relations with Turkey through policies
    far more significant than a symbolic resolution acknowledging a
    tragic historical period. The United States clandestinely backed
    an attempted military coup by right-wing Turkish officers in 2003,
    arming Iraqi and Iranian Kurds with close ties to Kurdish rebels in
    Turkey who have been responsible for the deaths of thousands of Turkish
    citizens. The United States also invaded neighboring Iraq. As a result,
    the percentage of Turks who view the United States positively declined
    from 52 percent to only 9 percent,” asserted Zunes.

    The Obama administration, also controlled by the neo-cons, insists that
    “this is a bad time to upset the Turkish government.

    However, it was also considered a ‘bad time’ to pass the resolution
    back in 2007, on the grounds that it not jeopardize U.S. access to
    Turkish bases as part of efforts to support the counter-insurgency
    war by U.S. occupation forces in Iraq. It was also considered a ‘bad
    time’ when a similar resolution was put forward in 2000 because the
    United States was using its bases in Turkey to patrol the ‘no fly
    zones’ in northern Iraq. And it was also considered a ‘bad time’
    in 1985 and 1987, when similar resolutions were put forward because
    U.S. bases in Turkey were considered important listening posts for
    monitoring the Soviet Union during the Cold War. For deniers of the
    Armenian genocide, it’s always a ‘bad time,’” he pointed out.

    In 1981, at a time when the neo-cons failed to control the White
    House, President Ronald Reagan brushed off strong diplomatic protests
    from Turkey and used the term genocide in relation to Armenians,
    yet U.S.-Turkish relations did not suffer.

    How come U.S. acknowledgement of the Jewish Holocaust does NOT upset
    the German government, which also hosts critical U.S. bases?

    “Obama is sending a message to future tyrants that they can commit
    genocide without acknowledgement by the world’s most powerful
    country.” In 1994, the Clinton administration “refused to use the word
    ‘genocide’ in the midst of the Rwandan government’s massacres of over
    half that country’s Tutsi population, a decision that contributed to
    the delay in deploying international peacekeeping forces until after
    the slaughter of 800,000 people. … The Obama administration’

    s
    position on the Armenian genocide isn’t simply about whether to
    commemorate a tragedy that took place 95 years ago. It’s about where
    we stand as a nation in facing up to the most horrible of crimes,”
    confronted Zunes.

    In a March 16 HuffingtonPost.com article, titled “Why the Armenian
    Genocide Matters,”, Writer of words and music, rider of waves, world
    traveler Robbie Gennet wrote: “You may ask yourself why the Armenian
    genocide currently matters, or more accurately, why Turkey is so
    resolute against it being recognized as such. One would think after
    almost a hundred years, an official apology for killing or displacing
    2 million Armenians would be a welcome and long overdue occasion for
    Turkey to make peace with Armenia
    . … Germany has made great steps to
    publicly acknowledge and profusely apologize for the Jewish Holocaust,
    even paying reparations, making holocaust denial and the display of
    symbols of Nazism a criminal offense and establishing a National
    Holocaust Memorial Museum in Berlin. But Turkey? They won’t even
    allow the US to label the Armenian genocide as such or acknowledge
    it in any way. Here is why: land.”

    She outlined: “Take a look at a map of pre-genocide Armenia here, here
    and here. What you will notice is that a huge chunk of what is now
    Turkey was then considered Armenia. If the 1915 Turkish actions were
    indeed recognized as a genocide, current day Armenia could potentially
    petition for the return of its land. Note that this may even include
    the area known as Cilicia, a separate but ethnically connected entity
    bordering the Mediterranean Sea that dates back to the Kingdom of
    Cilician Armenia in the early part of the second Millenium. These
    historically grounded lands could rightfully be considered Armenian if
    they could establish that they were unlawfully taken from them via the
    genocide.
    The evidence is there and so is the history. Armenia itself
    was officially named way back in 512 BC when it was annexed to Persia,
    while Cilicia was established as a principality it 1078. After years
    of struggle under Turkish, Kurdish and Mongol rule, the Ottoman Empire
    ruled Armenia from 1453-1829, after which the Russian Empire ruled
    through the rest of the 19th century. After the Genocide and WWI,
    what’s left of Armenia was annexed by Bolshevist Russia and became
    part of the Soviet Union from 1922-1991, after which Armenia declared
    its independence. But let’s back up for a moment for a glimpse at
    what happened during WWI”.

    She revealed: “In 1913, three so-called Young Turks took over the
    Turkish government via a coup with a goal of uniting all of the
    Turkic peoples in the region and creating a new Turkish empire called
    Turan with one language and one religion. They wanted to expand their
    borders eastward but standing in their way was historic Armenia. Hence,
    the Armenian Genocide.”

    Gennet asserted: “Judging from Turkey’s recalcitrance to discuss or
    acknowledge it, that stain may never go away. But that doesn’t mean
    it will ever be forgotten, no matter how much Turkey wishes it would
    fade into history. Though they would like to take advantage of the
    world’s collective amnesia, the internet has made it impossible to
    forget and erase” the facts of the genocide by Turkey. In answer to
    Adolph Hitler’s infamous quote, “Who still talks nowadays about the
    Armenians?” she rebutted: “We all do, Mr. Hitler, and long after your
    genocidal dreams have faded, long after the last survivors of those
    inflicted generations have passed, they will not be forgotten.”

    Turkish writer Lale Kemal interestingly wrote in Today’s Zaman:
    “Turkey has currently been paying the price of sweeping under the
    carpet its chronic and historic problems, such as the events of 1915,

    in which, it is claimed, over 1 million Armenians were subjected
    to a genocide campaign under the rule of the Ottoman Empire, the
    predecessor to modern Turkey.
    … The Armenian Diaspora has moved
    tobring this topic to the agenda of the Spanish Parliament after the
    regional Catalonian Parliament passed a bill recognizing the events
    as Armenian genocide. … The adoption of the genocide resolution
    by the Committee on Foreign Affairs has already set an encouraging
    example for Sweden to be followed by Britain.”

    Speaking of the Turkish-occupied Armenian lands, Kemal wrote: “But
    Ankara believes that adoption of such a resolution by the full US House
    would have a snowball effect, raising the danger that Armenians will
    initiate legal measures seeking land and compensation from Ankara.”

    While awareness of anti-Semitism is fortunately widespread enough
    to marginalize those who refuse to acknowledge the Holocaust,
    tolerance for anti-Armenian bigotry appears strong enough that it’s
    still considered politically acceptable to deny their genocide,”
    lamented Zunes.

    The U.S. congressional mid-term elections in November is the number
    one source for pre-occupation among the incumbent congressional
    candidates in battle-ground districts and states.

    Armenian Americans and their friends across the nation should move to
    politically punish the deniers. Denial of the crime of any genocide –
    from Turkish-occupied Western Armenia and Cilicia to Darfur, should
    be made politically unaffordable. The neo-cons and their lackeys do
    not understand the language of morality. But they readily comprehend
    the language of deterrence.