Tag: Council of Europe

  • The Submarine Deals That Helped Sink Greece

    The Submarine Deals That Helped Sink Greece

    The Wall Street Journal JULY 10, 2010

    SpartaSparta[SPARTAP1]

    By CHRISTOPHER RHOADS

    ATHENS–As Greece slashes spending to avoid default, it hasn’t moved
    to skimp on one area: defense. The deeply indebted Mediterranean
    nation, whose financial crisis roiled the global financial system
    this year, is spending more than a billion euros on two submarines
    from Germany. It’s also looking to spend big on six frigates and
    15 search-and-rescue helicopters from France. In recent years,
    Greece has bought more than two dozen F16 fighter jets from the
    U.S. at a cost of more than EU1.5 billion.

    Arne Lutkenhorst Among Greece’s questioned costs is more than a
    billion euros on new submarines.

    Much of the equipment comes from Germany, the country that has had
    to shoulder most of the burden of bailing out Greece and has been
    loudest in condemning Athens for living beyond its means. German
    Chancellor Angela Merkel has admonished the Greek government “to
    do its homework” on debt reduction. The military deals illustrate
    how Germany and other creditors have in some ways benefited from
    Greece’s profligacy, and how that is coming back to haunt them.
    Greece, with a population of just 11 million, is the largest importer
    of conventional weapons in Europe–and ranks fifth in the world
    behind China, India,

    the United Arab Emirates and South Korea. Its military spending is
    the highest in the European Union as a percentage of gross domestic
    product. That spending was one of the factors behind Greece’s
    stratospheric national debt. The German submarine deal in particular,
    announced in March as the country lurched toward bankruptcy, has
    cast a spotlight on the Greek military budget and

    on the foreign vendors supplying the hardware. The deal includes a
    total of six subs in a complicated transaction that began a decade
    ago with German firms. The arms sales are drawing heat from Turkey,
    Greece’s neighbor and arch-rival. “Even those countries trying to
    help Greece at this time of difficulty are offering to sell them
    new military equipment,” said Egemen Bagis, Turkey’s top European
    Union negotiator, shortly after the sub deal was announced. “Greece
    doesn’t need new tanks or missiles or submarines or fighter planes,
    neither does

    Turkey.”

    Greece’s deputy prime minister, Theodore Pangalos, said during an
    Athens visit in May by Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan
    that he felt “forced to buy weapons we do not need,” and that the
    deals made him feel “national shame.” Other European officials have
    charged France and Germany with making their military dealings with
    Greece a condition of their participation in the country’s huge
    financial rescue. French and German officials deny the accusations.
    A spokesman for German Chancellor Merkel says the submarine transaction
    was the culmination of an old contract signed long before Greece’s
    debt crisis. In May, France’s defense ministry said Greek authorities
    have confirmed their willingness to pursue talks on several
    arm-procurement deals.

    In May, Greece’s economic crimes unit began investigating all weapons
    deals of the past decade–totaling about EU16 billion–to determine
    if Greece overpaid or bought unnecessary hardware.

    Bloomberg News Prime Minister George Papandreou and his government
    have been chided over spending by Germany’s Angela Merkel. German
    prosecutors are investigating whether millions of euros in bribes
    were paid to Greek officials in connection with the sub deal. In
    May, the chief executive of one of the German companies helping to
    build the submarines, called

    Ferrostaal AG, resigned amid the probe. For some prominent Greeks,
    the latest submarine deal was the last straw. In late

    April, Stelios Fenekos, a 52-year-old vice admiral of the 22,000-person
    strong Greek Navy, resigned his position, bringing a three-decade
    Navy career to an end. He says he did so to protest the Greek defense
    minister’s decision to purchase the subs, as well as other decisions
    taken in recent months that Mr. Fenekos considers “politically
    motivated.” “How can you say to people we are buying more subs at
    the same time we want you to cut your salaries and pensions?” says
    Adm. Fenekos, in his first interview with a reporter. He was referring
    to the government’s 5% cut in most pensions and even deeper slashes
    to public-sector wages enacted in response to the crisis. The Greek
    Navy, he says, cannot afford to maintain the additional submarines.
    It currently has eight subs. A spokesman for the Greek Ministry
    of Defense said Mr. Fenekos’ resignation was accepted. In stepping
    down, “Mr. Fenekos did not refer to the submarine deal,” he said.
    Greece became the first battleground in the Cold War, with the U.S.
    backing anti-Communists in the Greek civil war in the late-1940s
    against Communist insurgents. The conflict led U.S. President Harry
    Truman, in 1947, to pledge unlimited military support for nations
    under Communist threat, known as the Truman Doctrine. While the
    rest of Western Europe used U.S. aid to rebuild its economy from
    the second World War, in Greece, the emphasis was on building up
    the military.

    “Greece became the front line in the Cold War, and that began, right
    then and there, the Greek economic crisis of today,” says Andre
    Gerolymatos, a professor of Hellenic studies at Simon Fraser
    University in Vancouver. By the mid-1950s, the U.S. pulled back
    aid, much of which had been in the form of military hardware,
    shifting much of the burden for Greek military spending to

    Athens.

    By this time, Greece’s worsening relations with Turkey led to yet
    more arms spending. Despite being fellow members of the North
    Atlantic Treaty Organization, the two nations are bitter rivals.
    The discovery of oil in the northern Aegean Sea and disagreements
    over territorial waters and airspace became the source of numerous–and
    expensive–altercations between the two countries.

    An incident in 1996, involving a Turkish ship running aground on a
    rocky, uninhabited Greek islet, almost led to war. Greece later
    that year announced a 10-year modernization program of its armed
    services, costing nearly $17 billion. The U.S. over the years
    catered to the two NATO members under a 7:10 ratio, meaning for
    every $7 million dollars of equipment it sold to Greece it sold $10
    million to the more populous Turkey. It was in that environment
    that Greece in 1998 went shopping for submarines. It decided on
    three German-built class-214 submarines, a state-of-the-art
    diesel-electric powered vessel, with the option of buying a fourth–for
    a total of EU1.8 billion. The first was to be built at the Kiel
    headquarters of Howaldtswerke-Deutsche Werft GmbH, with the others
    built at the affiliated Hellenic Shipyards SA, in Skaramangas,
    Greece. The arrangement, called the Archimedes Program, would
    preserve thousands of jobs

    at the Greek shipyard. Greek officials in 2002 expanded it to
    include the modernization of three older class-209 submarines–work
    to be done at the Skaramangas shipyard using materials

    and help from the Germans. The increase would cost another EU985
    million.

    The German side consisted of a company owned by German truckmaker
    MAN SE, called

    Ferrostaal, and Howaldtswerke-Deutsche Werft, now owned by ThyssenKrupp
    Marine Systems AG. (MAN has since reduced its stake in Ferrostaal
    to 30%.) The total cost of the new and renovated subs: EU2.84 billion.
    As the military expenditures rose, Greece’s two main political
    parties used them

    as a political football, each trying to make the budget deficit
    figures look worse when the other was in charge. When the Socialist
    government first bought the submarines, it post-dated the accounting
    for them to the day when the vessels were to be delivered, rather
    than when they were purchased.

    The government at the time was struggling to meet budget criteria
    for entry into

    the euro zone, which it joined a year behind other members in 2001.
    Pushing back

    the expenses saddled the bill with the Socialists’ successors, the
    conservative New Democracy party, which came to power in March 2004.

    The New Democracy government that year then used a similar tactic,
    by
    retroactively accounting for the expenditures on the date of purchase.
    That inflated the budget deficits of the previous government–while
    making it easier for the New Democracy government to meet its own
    deficit goals.

    Both accounting methods at the time were allowed by the European
    Union. The resulting massive deficit revisions made in 2004 for the
    previous years–4.6% of gross domestic product versus 1.7% for
    2003–triggered an investigation in 2004 by Eurostat, the European
    Union’s statistics agency, to understand what caused the revisions.
    The findings did not result in any sanctions.

    Military spending accounted for nearly a quarter of the difference
    in the 2003 figures, and even more in revisions made on the deficits
    for preceding years.

    After the Socialist party, PASOK, returned to power in October 2009,
    it made a similar maneuver: It announced the federal deficit was
    much worse than the outgoing government had let on, mainly due to
    public hospital debts, setting in motion the financial crisis.
    Meanwhile, not one of the subs had been delivered. When Greek
    officials traveled

    to Kiel to test the first sub, called the Papanikolis, they said
    that they found

    that in certain sea conditions the submarine listed to the right.
    “The Navy said

    we cannot accept this sub,” said Mr. Fenekos, the admiral who
    recently resigned.

    “But the politicians did not want to stop it because they needed
    the production for the workers in the shipyard here.” ThyssenKrupp
    Marine Systems said the criticism was baseless and was made to delay
    payment. By last fall, Greece had paid EU2.032 billion, about 70%
    of the total owed. With the deal at an impasse, the German companies
    cancelled the contract. Finally, in March, the two sides announced
    they had begun negotiating a new deal. Instead of having three older
    subs modernized, just one would be modernized, and Greece would buy
    two additional new ones, bringing the total to six new submarines–costing
    a total of EU1.3 billion.

    Abu Dhabi MAR LLC, a shipbuilding company in Abu Dhabi, would buy
    75.1% of the Greek shipyard, with the expanded submarine deal a
    condition of the sale. The Greek government finally accepted the
    sub, with the understanding it would immediately resell it. No deal
    has been finalized.

    Greece’s defense minister, Evangelos Venizelos, speaking to the
    Greek parliament

    in March, explained that the deal was an attempt to end the mess,
    to “sever the Gordian knot” that the new government had inherited.

    With 1,200 shipyard jobs at stake, Germany demanding concessions
    on the complex deal, and Greece having already paid two billion
    euros without receiving a single sub, the new arrangement was
    necessary, he said.

    But in February, just as a solution appeared to be at hand, German
    prosecutors in Munich began turning up evidence of unsavory dealings,
    according to records of their investigation.

    Ferrostaal executives authorized payments worth millions of euros
    to politicians

    to win the initial deal in 2000, through a Greek company called
    Marine Industrial Enterprises, according to the Munich prosecutor’s
    records.

    To do this, Ferrostaal used sham consulting contracts, according
    to the records.

    That company then distributed payments to “officials and decision-makers”
    in Greece, according to the records. The investigation is ongoing.
    No charges have been filed.

    Adamos Seraphides, chairman of MIE Group Limited, a successor company
    to a division of Marine Industrial Enterprises, said he doesn’t
    believe that the company’s prior leadership was involved in bribery.
    In March, police searched Ferrostaal offices, in Essen, seeking
    evidence of bribe payments. In May, several executives stepped down.

    “Ferrostaal will continue to pursue the intensive dialogue with the
    state prosecutor’s office in Munich and has pledged full and
    comprehensive support and

    cooperation,” says a Ferrostaal spokesman.

    A ThyssenKrupp spokesperson says the company got into the business
    only in 2005,

    when it bought Howaldtswerke-Deutsche Werft. Despite the tortuous,
    decade-long journey of the submarine deal–and Greece’s precarious
    financial standing–Germany stands ready for more business. Guido
    Westerwelle, the German foreign minister, in February told a Greek
    newspaper that Germany doesn’t want to force Greece to buy anything.

    But “whenever it comes to the point when it’s ready to buy fighter
    planes,” a European fighter-plane consortium, which Germany represents
    in Greece, “wants to

    be considered in the decision.”

    A spokesman for Mr. Westerwelle says the minister didn’t discuss
    fighter sales with the Greek government during the visit.–Alkman
    Granitsas, David Crawford and

    David Gauthier-Villars contributed to this article.

  • GAZA FLOTILLA: NATIONAL DEMONSTRATION IN UK!

    GAZA FLOTILLA: NATIONAL DEMONSTRATION IN UK!

    GAZA FLOTILLA: NATIONAL DEMONSTRATION IN UK!
    GAZA FLOTILLA: NATIONAL DEMONSTRATION IN UK!

    Date: Saturday 5th June

    Assemble 1:30pm outside Downing Street, LONDON, UK

    March to Israeli Embassy

    with speakers from the Flotolla

  • End the Siege of Gaza
  • Freedom for Palestine
  • Turkey is an enormous present on Europe’s doorstep (Video)

    Turkey is an enormous present on Europe’s doorstep (Video)

    Turkey is an enormous present on Europe’s doorstep. Speaker: Professor Norman Stone

    Arguing against the motion ‘Let’s keep Turkey out of Europe’, Norman Stone asserts that Turkey’s history mirrors that of Spain, now one of Europe’s greatest success stories. The EU has a crucial opportunity to influence Turkey, to shape it, and create an entirely new civilisation. Europe should mean something for Turkey the way it held promise for post-Second World War populations. Turkey is an enormous present on Europe’s doorstep.

    Contribution by Mr Yusuf Cinar and Mr Nizam Bulut, Ireland

  • Turkey will make Europe a better model and actor (Video)

    Turkey will make Europe a better model and actor (Video)

    Turkey will make Europe a better model and actor (Video).  Speaker: Dominique Moisi

    Arguing against the motion ‘Let’s keep Turkey out of Europe’, Dominique Moisi says he regards the debate over Turkey as part of the battle between hope and fear. Europe’s dissolution is much more unlikely than proponents of the motion make it out to be. Europe’s role in the international system is as a model and an actor; Turkey’s inclusion would make it a better model and a more powerful actor. He argues that this is Europe’s great opportunity to show the rest of the world that it does not believe in a clash of civilisations between Islam and modernity, democracy and secularism. Finally, he believes that one of Europe’s key weaknesses in the years to come will be its demography, an ageing population lacking energy. Citing the success of earlier enlargement into Eastern and Central Europe, he says that Turkey will easily provide citizens hungry for progress and economic triumph that are lacking in today’s Europe. Europe needs new blood.

    Return to full video

    Contribution by Mr Yusuf Cinar, Ireland

  • The United Ireland Party officially supports Turkish membership of the EU

    The United Ireland Party officially supports Turkish membership of the EU

    The United Ireland Party, FINE GAEL, has said it officially supports Turkish membership of the European Union notwithstanding opposition to the move expressed by one of its TDs this week.

    The party’s spokesman on foreign affairs, Billy Timmins, yesterday said that views expressed by Lucinda Creighton rejecting Turkish accession to the union did not reflect party policy.

    However, Ms Creighton said last night it was time to review party policy.

    “Fine Gael policy is that we are in favour of Turkish accession as long as it meets certain requirements,” said Mr Timmins.

    “A number are set out in the Ankara Protocol, including the use of ports in Cyprus. It has fulfilled some of them,” he said.

    Mr Timmins pointed out that a motion supporting Turkish membership of the EU was approved by the Fine Gael ardfheis in 2004.

    In a speech to a party meeting in her Dublin South East constituency earlier this week, Ms Creighton criticised comments by President Mary McAleese during her official visit to Turkey supporting its application for EU membership.

    Ms Creighton described the argument for Turkish membership as “fundamentally flawed” and contended that Turkey was not wealthy enough to join the EU.

    The union would have difficulty absorbing a country with a population of 72 million, she said, warning of a new wave of immigration to Ireland that would follow its accession.

    Ms Creighton also asserted that, geographically, Turkey could not be considered part of Europe.

    “By allowing Turkey accede to the European Union, the floodgates would be opened up to countries such as Morocco, who have as legitimate and credible a claim to EU membership as Turkey,” she said.

    Fianna Fáil TD Michael Mulcahy also criticised Ms Creighton’s dismissal of Turkish aspiration to EU membership as “scaremongering”. He said Turkey had formalised commercial ties with the European Union.

    “Deputy Creighton should remember that it has been long-standing Irish Government policy to support Turkish membership of the European Union, and her attempts to derail this worthwhile inclusion of Turkey by scaremongering on the issue of unemployment, is not appropriate.”

    “Of course, there is a disparity in wealth between the European average and Turkey, but the Turkish economy is a very dynamic economy, set to grow by 10 per cent next year, and it is a sheer fallacy to believe that millions of Turkish people would descend on Ireland if Turkey was granted full membership of the European Union.

    “There has not been a massive migration of workers from Bulgaria or Romania, both of whom have a much lower GDP per head than Ireland,” he said.

    He also called on Fine Gael leader Enda Kenny to clarify if Ms Creighton’s views now represented the party’s official policy on the matter.

    Contribution by Mr. Nizam Bulut

  • The peoples of both Ireland and Turkey suffered from Winston Churchill

    The peoples of both Ireland and Turkey suffered from Winston Churchill

    I should remind you here that ‘our gallant ally’ , U.K. , had conquered and subdued Namibia and Tanganyika by methods even more barbarous than those of the British in taking their own African empire. These were foolish times of course, and only an idiot today would look back to the bloodshed of these years with pride.

    I am happy to say that in Ireland, we have put the 1916 Rising well behind us, and we refer to it merely as an example of the sorry lunacy that can seize the souls of otherwise good men, when madness becomes fashionable. So, at least some of the seeds of the 1916 Rising were sown in the Dardanelles. It was a cruel paradox that the first regiment to arrive from Britain to put down the Rising were the Sherwood Foresters — who, if you remember, had been used to ‘secure’ the Turkish battleships, the seizure of which had helped propel the Ottomans to war in the first place.

    Yes, in the loathsome figure of Winston Churchill — an imperialistic war-monger and egotistical bully — the Turkish and Irish peoples are united by a common and imperishable loathing.’

    Now, through some inexplicable oversight, the Department of Foreign Affairs did not give this speech of mine for the President to make at Gallipoli. Why not? The British tabloid headlines the next day would have been the purest joy to read.

    And as for the President’s comments about Turkey’s proposed membership of the EU, which have clearly vexed many of you, more  at

    kmyers@independent.ie

    – Kevin Myers

    Irish Independent