Page last updated at 21:23 GMT, Monday, 21 June 2010 22:23 UK
Turkey’s president has held an emergency security meeting to discuss how to rein in violence in the country’s mainly Kurdish south-east.
Eleven soldiers were killed over the weekend in an attack by the banned Kurdish Workers Party, the PKK. Recent weeks have seen a sharp increase in armed clashes between the PKK and the Turkish military.
Judge will investigate allegations that UK was complicit in abuse of detainees
Patrick Wintour, Nicholas Watt, Ian Cobain
William Hague arrives at Downing Street for a cabinet meeting. Photograph: Andy Rain/EPA
A judge will investigate claims that British intelligence agencies were complicit in the torture of terror suspects, William Hague, the foreign secretary, said tonight.
The move was welcomed by civil liberties campaigners and may put pressure on the Labour leadership candidate and former foreign secretary David Miliband, who was accused by Hague, while in opposition, of having something to hide.
Miliband has repeatedly rejected the accusation and broadly indicated that he or his officials may have been misled by foreign intelligence agencies about the degree of British complicity.
Hague’s remarks appear to have caught the Foreign Office by surprise, as no details were yet available on how the inquiry will be conducted, its terms of reference or when it will start work.
Hague will come under pressure to ensure the inquiry is public and comprehensive. He first called last year for an independent judicial inquiry into claims that British officials had colluded in the torture of Binyam Mohamed, the former Guantánamo detainee and a UK resident.
Mohamed claimed that he was tortured by US forces in Pakistan and Morocco, and that MI5 fed the CIA questions that were used by US forces.
Philippe Sands QC, professor of law at University College London, said tonight: “To restore trust in government, both here and abroad, and to get to the truth, the inquiry needs to be deep and broad and as open as possible. It should address, in particular, who authorised what and when and why, what the relevant legal advice said, and how it related to any change in US practice in 2002 and 2003.”
Tayab Ali, a London solicitor who represents a number of men alleging torture, said the inquiry presented “a significant and precious opportunity” for the British public to understand their country’s role in torture.
He Ali added: “It is essential that the inquiry is credible. It should be as open as possible, led by a judge and those affected should be properly represented. Anything less is likely to mean that the inquiry will fail in providing proper answers and holding those responsible to account for their actions.”
Hague’s statement redeems a pledge that both he and his then Liberal Democrat opposite number, Ed Davey, made in opposition. Hague told the BBC: “We have said again in the coalition agreement that we want a judge-led inquiry. So will there be an inquiry of some form? Yes, both parties in the coalition said they wanted that. Now what we’re working on is what form that should take.”
The coalition agreement published today by the government does not explicitly call for a judicial inquiry; it simply states: “We will never condone the use of torture.”
Hague criticised the Labour government last year for failing to provide straightforward answers after the high court upheld one of Mohamed’s claims. This was that the security services had put questions to him, through the US, even during a two-year period when they did not know where Mohamed was being held, according to Hague.
“So far ministers have stuck to the mantra that ‘we never condone, authorise or co-operate in torture’,” Hague wrote. “But this does not dispel any of the accusations. If anything, there is now a direct and irreconcilable conflict between such ministerial assurances and the account given by Mr Mohamed. That must be resolved.”
He added: “We cannot sweep these allegations under the carpet. Until the full facts are known, Britain’s name and reputation will be dragged through the mud – not least by the terrorists and extremists who will exploit these allegations for their own propaganda.’
“It is vital to remember that torture does not help us defeat terrorists; it helps them to try to justify their hostility to us.”
The inquiry to which Hague has now committed himself will need to find a way of offering immunity to anyone who comes forward to give evidence. Although immunity deals are rarely granted to those who are complicit in torture, lawyers who advised Tory shadow ministers in the run-up to the election concluded that it is possible. Such a deal would be of clear benefit to the two MI5 and MI6 officers who are currently at the centre of a Scotland Yard investigation into their alleged criminal wrongdoing.
An inquiry may also help to resolve the many civil cases being brought by victims of torture and rendition. Government lawyers are expected to offer out-of-court settlements worth millions of pounds after the court of appeal this month dismissed an attempt by MI5 and MI6 to suppress evidence of alleged complicity.
https://www.theguardian.com/law/2010/may/20/torture-william-hague-terrorism, 20 May 2010
From Left: United States Air Force; Robert Young Pelton; Mike Wintroath/Associated Press; Adam Berry/Bloomberg News
From left: Michael D. Furlong, the official who was said to have hired private contractors to track militants in Afghanistan and Pakistan; Robert Young Pelton, a contractor; Duane Clarridge, a former C.I.A. official; and Eason Jordan, a former television news executive.
By DEXTER FILKINS and MARK MAZZETTI
Published: March 14, 2010
KABUL, Afghanistan — Under the cover of a benign government information-gathering program, a Defense Department official set up a network of private contractors in Afghanistan and Pakistan to help track and kill suspected militants, according to military officials and businessmen in Afghanistan and the United States. The official, Michael D. Furlong, hired contractors from private security companies that employed former C.I.A. and Special Forces operatives. The contractors, in turn, gathered intelligence on the whereabouts of suspected militants and the location of insurgent camps, and the information was then sent to military units and intelligence officials for possible lethal action in Afghanistan and Pakistan, the officials said.
While it has been widely reported that the C.I.A. and the military are attacking operatives of Al Qaeda and others through unmanned, remote-controlled drone strikes, some American officials say they became troubled that Mr. Furlong seemed to be running an off-the-books spy operation. The officials say they are not sure who condoned and supervised his work.
It is generally considered illegal for the military to hire contractors to act as covert spies. Officials said Mr. Furlong’s secret network might have been improperly financed by diverting money from a program designed to merely gather information about the region.
Moreover, in Pakistan, where Qaeda and Taliban leaders are believed to be hiding, the secret use of private contractors may be seen as an attempt to get around the Pakistani government’s prohibition of American military personnel’s operating in the country.
Officials say Mr. Furlong’s operation seems to have been shut down, and he is now is the subject of a criminal investigation by the Defense Department for a number of possible offenses, including contract fraud.
Even in a region of the world known for intrigue, Mr. Furlong’s story stands out. At times, his operation featured a mysterious American company run by retired Special Operations officers and an iconic C.I.A. figure who had a role in some of the agency’s most famous episodes, including the Iran-Contra affair.
The allegations that he ran this network come as the American intelligence community confronts other instances in which private contractors may have been improperly used on delicate and questionable operations, including secret raids in Iraq and an assassinations program that was halted before it got off the ground.
“While no legitimate intelligence operations got screwed up, it’s generally a bad idea to have freelancers running around a war zone pretending to be James Bond,” one American government official said. But it is still murky whether Mr. Furlong had approval from top commanders or whether he might have been running a rogue operation.
This account of his activities is based on interviews with American military and intelligence officials and businessmen in the region. They insisted on anonymity in discussing a delicate case that is under investigation.
Col. Kathleen Cook, a spokeswoman for United States Strategic Command, which oversees Mr. Furlong’s work, declined to make him available for an interview. Military officials said Mr. Furlong, a retired Air Force officer, is now a senior civilian employee in the military, a full-time Defense Department employee based at Lackland Air Force Base in San Antonio.
Network of Informants
Mr. Furlong has extensive experience in “psychological operations” — the military term for the use of information in warfare — and he plied his trade in a number of places, including Iraq and the Balkans. It is unclear exactly when Mr. Furlong’s operations began. But officials said they seemed to accelerate in the summer of 2009, and by the time they ended, he and his colleagues had established a network of informants in Afghanistan and Pakistan whose job it was to help locate people believed to be insurgents.
Government officials said they believed that Mr. Furlong might have channeled money away from a program intended to provide American commanders with information about Afghanistan’s social and tribal landscape, and toward secret efforts to hunt militants on both sides of the country’s porous border with Pakistan.
Some officials said it was unclear whether these operations actually resulted in the deaths of militants, though others involved in the operation said that they did.
Military officials said that Mr. Furlong would often boast about his network of informants in Afghanistan and Pakistan to senior military officers, and in one instance said a group of suspected militants carrying rockets by mule over the border had been singled out and killed as a result of his efforts.
In addition, at least one government contractor who worked with Mr. Furlong in Afghanistan last year maintains that he saw evidence that the information was used for attacking militants.
The contractor, Robert Young Pelton, an author who writes extensively about war zones, said that the government hired him to gather information about Afghanistan and that Mr. Furlong improperly used his work. “We were providing information so they could better understand the situation in Afghanistan, and it was being used to kill people,” Mr. Pelton said.
He said that he and Eason Jordan, a former television news executive, had been hired by the military to run a public Web site to help the government gain a better understanding of a region that bedeviled them. Recently, the top military intelligence official in Afghanistan publicly said that intelligence collection was skewed too heavily toward hunting terrorists, at the expense of gaining a deeper understanding of the country.
Instead, Mr. Pelton said, millions of dollars that were supposed to go to the Web site were redirected by Mr. Furlong toward intelligence gathering for the purpose of attacking militants.
In one example, Mr. Pelton said he had been told by Afghan colleagues that video images that he posted on the Web site had been used for an American strike in the South Waziristan region of Pakistan.
Among the contractors Mr. Furlong appears to have used to conduct intelligence gathering was International Media Ventures, a private “strategic communication” firm run by several former Special Operations officers. Another was American International Security Corporation, a Boston-based company run by Mike Taylor, a former Green Beret. In a phone interview, Mr. Taylor said that at one point he had employed Duane Clarridge, known as Dewey, a former top C.I.A. official who has been linked to a generation of C.I.A. adventures, including the Iran-Contra scandal.
In an interview, Mr. Clarridge denied that he had worked with Mr. Furlong in any operation in Afghanistan or Pakistan. “I don’t know anything about that,” he said.
Mr. Taylor, who is chief executive of A.I.S.C., said his company gathered information on both sides of the border to give military officials information about possible threats to American forces. He said his company was not specifically hired to provide information to kill insurgents.
Some American officials contend that Mr. Furlong’s efforts amounted to little. Nevertheless, they provoked the ire of the C.I.A.
Last fall, the spy agency’s station chief in Kabul, Afghanistan’s capital, wrote a memorandum to the Defense Department’s top intelligence official detailing what officials said were serious offenses by Mr. Furlong. The officials would not specify the offenses, but the officer’s cable helped set off the Pentagon investigation.
Afghan Intelligence
In mid-2008, the military put Mr. Furlong in charge of a program to use private companies to gather information about the political and tribal culture of Afghanistan. Some of the approximately $22 million in government money allotted to this effort went to International Media Ventures, with offices in St. Petersburg, Fla., San Antonio and elsewhere. On its Web site, the company describes itself as a public relations company, “an industry leader in creating potent messaging content and interactive communications.”
The Web site also shows that several of its senior executives are former members of the military’s Special Operations forces, including former commandos from Delta Force, which has been used extensively since the Sept. 11 attacks to track and kill suspected terrorists.
Until recently, one of the members of International Media’s board of directors was Gen. Dell L. Dailey, former head of Joint Special Operations Command, which oversees the military’s covert units.
In an e-mail message, General Dailey said that he had resigned his post on the company’s board, but he did not say when. He did not give details about the company’s work with the American military, and other company executives declined to comment.
In an interview, Rear Adm. Gregory Smith, the top military spokesman in Afghanistan, said that the United States military was currently employing nine International Media Ventures civilian employees on routine jobs in guard work and information processing and analysis. Whatever else other International Media employees might be doing in Afghanistan, he said, he did not know and had no responsibility for their actions.
By Mr. Pelton’s account, Mr. Furlong, in conversations with him and his colleagues, referred to his stable of contractors as “my Jason Bournes,” a reference to the fictional American assassin created by the novelist Robert Ludlum and played in movies by Matt Damon.
Military officials said that Mr. Furlong would occasionally brag to his superiors about having Mr. Clarridge’s services at his disposal. Last summer, Mr. Furlong told colleagues that he was working with Mr. Clarridge to secure the release of Pfc. Bowe Bergdahl, a kidnapped soldier who American officials believe is being held by militants in Pakistan.
From December 2008 to mid-June 2009, both Mr. Taylor and Mr. Clarridge were hired to assist The New York Times in the case of David Rohde, the Times reporter who was kidnapped by militants in Afghanistan and held for seven months in Pakistan’s tribal areas. The reporter ultimately escaped on his own.
The idea for the government information program was thought up sometime in 2008 by Mr. Jordan, a former CNN news chief, and his partner Mr. Pelton, whose books include “The World’s Most Dangerous Places” and “Licensed to Kill: Hired Guns in the War on Terror.”
Top General Approached
They approached Gen. David D. McKiernan, soon to become the top American commander in Afghanistan. Their proposal was to set up a reporting and research network in Afghanistan and Pakistan for the American military and private clients who were trying to understand a complex region that had become vital to Western interests. They already had a similar operation in Iraq — called “Iraq Slogger,” which employed local Iraqis to report and write news stories for their Web site. Mr. Jordan proposed setting up a similar Web site in Afghanistan and Pakistan — except that the operation would be largely financed by the American military. The name of the Web site was Afpax.
Mr. Jordan said that he had gone to the United States military because the business in Iraq was not profitable relying solely on private clients. He described his proposal as essentially a news gathering operation, involving only unclassified materials gathered openly by his employees. “It was all open-source,” he said.
When Mr. Jordan made the pitch to General McKiernan, Mr. Furlong was also present, according to Mr. Jordan. General McKiernan endorsed the proposal, and Mr. Furlong said that he could find financing for Afpax, both Mr. Jordan and Mr. Pelton said. “On that day, they told us to get to work,” Mr. Pelton said.
But Mr. Jordan said that the help from Mr. Furlong ended up being extremely limited. He said he was paid twice — once to help the company with start-up costs and another time for a report his group had written. Mr. Jordan declined to talk about exact figures, but said the amount of money was a “small fraction” of what he had proposed — and what it took to run his news gathering operation.
Whenever he asked for financing, Mr. Jordan said, Mr. Furlong told him that the money was being used for other things, and that the appetite for Mr. Jordan’s services was diminishing.
“He told us that there was less and less money for what we were doing, and less of an appreciation for what we were doing,” he said.
Admiral Smith, the military’s director for strategic communications in Afghanistan, said that when he arrived in Kabul a year later, in June 2009, he opposed financing Afpax. He said that he did not need what Mr. Pelton and Mr. Jordan were offering and that the service seemed uncomfortably close to crossing into intelligence gathering — which could have meant making targets of individuals.
“I took the air out of the balloon,” he said.
Admiral Smith said that the C.I.A. was against the proposal for the same reasons. Mr. Furlong persisted in pushing the project, he said.
“I finally had to tell him, ‘Read my lips,’ we’re not interested,’ ” Admiral Smith said.
What happened next is unclear.
Admiral Smith said that when he turned down the Afpax proposal, Mr. Furlong wanted to spend the leftover money elsewhere. That is when Mr. Furlong agreed to provide some of International Media Ventures’ employees to Admiral Smith’s strategic communications office.
But that still left roughly $15 million unaccounted for, he said.
“I have no idea where the rest of the money is going,” Admiral Smith said.
Dexter Filkins reported from Kabul, and Mark Mazzetti from Washington.
Dr. Rauni Kilde on the Swine Flu and the Depopulation Agenda
Rauni-Leena Luukanen-Kilde (born 1939 in Värtsilä, now in the Republic of Karelia) was the provincial medical officer of the Finnish Lapland Province with a doctorate in medicine from 1975 until a car accident in 1986, which took away her ability to continue her work and career. Since then she has been best known for her UFO contacts and related thoughts.
video :
From: tezer de groot [tezerdegroot@yahoo.com]
Finlandiya’da Lapland bölgesinin eski Sağlık Bakanı Dr. Rauni Kilde ..Domuz gribi aşısı bir aldatmaca ..dünya nüfusunun çoğu öldürülmek isteniyor,……….Dr. Kilde, 14-15 Mayıs 2009 tarihinde yapılan Bilderberg toplantısında bu kararın alındığını belirtti.
Kilde: “Grip aşısı milyonları öldürecek”
Finlandiya’lı Dr. Rauni Kilde’den domuz gribi hakkında çok çarpıcı açıklamalar… Kilde; “Dünya nüfusunun üçte ikisini öldürmek istiyorlar” dedi ve dünya karıştı..
Finlandiya’da Lapland bölgesinin eski Sağlık Bakanı Dr. Rauni Kilde’den domuz gribi hakkında çor cesur açıklama. Domuz gribi aşısının bir aldatmaca olduğunu itirafa eden Dr. Kilde, “Bu aşı ile mümkün olduğunca dünya nüfusunun çoğu öldürülmek isteniyor, bu nedenle önce küçük çocuklara ve hamile kadınlara uygulanması öneriliyor” dedi.
Bu düşüncenin eski ABD Başkanlarından Henry Kissinger’e ait olduğunu söyleyen Dr. Kilde, 14-15 Mayıs 2009 tarihinde yapılan Bilderberg toplantısında bu kararın alındığını belirtti.
Dr. Kilde, bir televizyona yaptığı açıklamasında, “ABD, hiçbir maddi kayıp yaşamadan hatta milyarlarca dolar kazanarak dünya nüfusunu üçte iki oranında azaltmayı hedeflemektedir” diye konuştu.
Dünya Sağlık Örgütü’ne domuz gribinin ölümcül bir salgın olduğu yönünde beyanda bulunması için baskı yaptıklarını belirten Rauni Kilde, “Böylece aşıyı tercihli değil zorunlu yapmak istiyorlardı. Özellikle hamile kadınların ve çocukların ilk önce aşı ile zorunlu tutulması gelecek nesilleri hedeflediğini göstermektedir” açıklamasında bulundu.
Finlandiya hükümetinin sınıflandırmayı kabul etmediğini ve aşının zorunluluğunu kaldırmak için, hastalığın derecesini normal olarak gösterdiğini ifade eden Kilde sözlerini şöyle sürdürdü; “Hiç kimse aşının bir yıl, beş yıl ya da 20 yıl sonra ne gibi etkilerinin olacağını bilmiyor: Mutlak kısırlık mı? Kanser mi? Ya da ölümcül herhangi bir hastalık mı?”
Dr. Rauni Kilde, “Amerikan yönetimi ileride bundan dolayı doğacak herhangi bir sıkıntıdan dolayı ilaç şirketlerine bir sorumluluk yüklenmemesi için şimdiden önlemini aldı ve onları tüm sorumluluklardan muaf tuttu. Bu bile işin ciddiyetini göstermeye yeter” dedi.
Kaynak:
***
Bu haberin içeriğini destekleyen ve uygulanmış olan iki ayrı önemli projeden bahsetmek istiyorum ;
20 yıllık kısırlaştırma projesi
Küçük bir Kaliforniya biyoteknoloji şirketi olan Epicyte, genetik mühendisliği marifetiyle, yendiğinde erkeği kısırlaştıran bir mısır geliştirdiklerini açıkladı.
Epicyte, Svalbard’ın iki sponsoru olan DuPont ve Syngenta ile teknolojilerini yaymak için ortaklık kurmuştu.
Çok ilginçtir ki Epicyte, genetiği değiştirilmiş sperm öldürücülü mısırı
ABD Tarım Bakanlığından (USDA) aldığı araştırma fonuyla geliştirmişti.
Toplumun üremesini engelleyecek olan işlem önce erkeği kısırlaştirmak amaciyla spermi öldüren bir katkiyla mısır vasitasiyla kullanima verildi. Erkeklerin spermleri , döllenme sağlayamayacak duruma getirilmeye başlandi.
Böylece “Negatif ojenik” projesi yürütülmeye başlandi. Kara baronlar bununla da yetinmediler . Bir başka uygulamalari da şöyle oldu ;
1990’larda BM Dünya Sağlık örgütü, Nikaragua, Meksika ve Filipinler’de 15 ila 45 yaşları arasındaki milyonlarca kadının tetanoza karşı aşılanması için
bir kampanya başlattı.Erkekler de tetanoz olabilirdi ama aşı erkeklere yapılmadı.
Bu şüphe uyandırıcı durumdan ötürü Katolik bir kilise organizasyonu olan Comite Pro Vida de Mexico (Meksika Yaşam Komitesi) aşıları test ettirdi. Test sonuçları ile, Dünya Sağlık örgütü’nün (WHO) yalnızca çocuk doğuracak yaştaki
kadınlara dağıttığı aşıların Chorionic Gonadotrophin (hCG) içerdiği ortaya çıktı.
Doğal bir hormon olan hCG, tetanoz toksoid taşıyıcılarıyla birleştiğinde kadınların hamile kalmasını engelleyen antikorları üretiyordu.
Daha sonradan ortaya çıktı ki Rockefeller Vakfı, Rockefeller Nüfus Konseyi, Dünya Bankası ve ABD Ulusal Sağlık Enstitüleri, Dünya Sağlık örgütü (WHO) için tetanoz taşıyıcın bir kısırlaştırma aşısı üretmek için 1972’de 20 yıllık bir proje başlatmışlardı.
Ayrıca Svalbard Kıyamet Tohum Deposu’nun ev sahibi Norveç hükümeti kısırlaştırıcı aşının üretilmesi için 41 milyon dolar bağış yapmıştı!
***
Saygın okur ,
Yukarıda görüldüğü gibi Dünyanın en etkin kurumları ,şirketleri , vakıfları
Dünya toplum sağlığını ve üremesini olumsuz bakımdan etkileyecek
çalışmalar yapmış ve projeler üretmiştir.
Emperyalizmin ve küresel ağaların dünyada yaşayan toplumları gıda üzerinden
kontrol ederek denetlemek ve yönetmek projeleri olduğunu biliyoruz.
GDO’lu gıdalar ve tohumlar da bu nedenle kullanıma sokulmuştur.
Aynı çalışmalar ise yoğun bir şekilde GDO üzerinden oynanmaktadır.
Genetiğiyle oynanan gıdaların insanoğlu üzerindeki etkileri nedeniyle sağlıklı olmayan,
beyin ve düşünsel kavrama yeteneği gelişmemiş ,aksine kas gücü yüksek olan köle toplumlar
ile üreme yeteneği azaltılmış toplumlar da yaratmak mümkündür .
Benzeri çalışmalar aşı üzerinden de yapılmıştır.
Önce bir salgın yaratılarak , salgın hastalığını önleyecek olan bir aşı içinde
toplumlara her türlü virus ve benzeri hastalık unsurlarını vermek mümkündür !
Üstelik de salgını yaratacak olan aşı para karşılığı verilecek,
Diğer bir deyişle , yaratılan hastalık para karşılığı satılacaktır !!!
Şimdi bana paranoyak diyebilirsiniz ,
O zaman aşağıdaki farklı bir haberi okuyunuz ;
mikrobiyoloji uzmanı Joseph Moshe Amerika’datutuklandı
3 ay önce Yahudi kökenli bir mikrobiyoloji uzmanı Joseph Moshe Amerika’da katıldığı bir
talk show programında; adı “Baxter Intl” olan bir şirketin Ukrayna laboratuarında biyolojik savaş aracı olarak kullanılmak üzere çok tehlikeli bir grip virüsü üzerine çalışma yaptığını ve bunun sonuçlarının iyi olmayacağını söylemişti.
Talk show programının hemen çıkışında arabası durdurularak yüzüne gaz sıkma metodu ile etkisiz hale getirilmiş ve Amerikanın LAPD SWAT komando timi tarafından alelacele tutuklanmıştı.
3 ay içinde süreç aynen Joseph Moshe’nin söylediği şekilde gerçekleşti. Domuz gribi salgınının hemen ardından, Ukrayna’da çok daha tehlikeli bir virüs salgını ortaya cıktı. Ölümler sonucu yapılan otopsilerde ölen insanların akciğerlerinin tamamen kan ile dolu olduğu görüldü. Tesadüfe bakınız ki domuz gribi virüsü de yine bu şirketin
araştırma laboratuarının bulunduğu bir bölgede ortaya çıktı ve yayıldı.
Öte yandan domuz gribi aşısını bir diğer üreten şirket yılsonunda 500 milyon Euro kar ile kapatacaklarını açıkladı.
Bahsi geçen virüs üretici şirket menşei tahmin edin hangi ülkeye ait?
Tabii ki Amerika.
Amerika bugün kendi krizini tüm dünyaya mal etmenin hemen arkasından, kendi ekonomisini sağlık sektörüne dayandırarak tekrar kurtarma çabasında ve bu şirket Amerikan hükümeti tarafından aktif olarak desteklenmekte.
Joseph Moshe’nin tutuklanma aceleciliği ve şekli bile bunu ispatlar nitelikte.
Laboratuarlarının bulunduğu bölgelerde tüm dünyaya yayılma potansiyeli bulunan yeni ve tehlikeli salgınlar ortaya çıkmakta. *2*
EK’te Amerika’da bu şirket aleyhine açılmış davaya ait toplam 105 sayfalık bir dokuman,
var .
***
Başka ne diyeyim saygın okur ?
Geçmiş olsun !
Naci Kaptan
***
TANITIM VE KAYNAKÇALAR
Dr. Rauni Kilde on the Swine Flu and the Depopulation Agenda
Rauni-Leena Luukanen-Kilde (born 1939 in Värtsilä, now in the Republic of Karelia) was the provincial medical officer of the Finnish Lapland Province with a doctorate in medicine from 1975 until a car accident in 1986, which took away her ability to continue her work and career. Since then she has been best known for her UFO contacts and related thoughts
***
Dr.Joseph Moshe
Moshe was dramatically arrested and detained by the FBI last week having earlier called Dr True Ott’s radio show claiming that Baxter was incorporating a bioweapon in its vaccine.Joseph Moshe – BioMedical Scientist
Moshe was dramatically arrested and detained by the FBI last week having earlier called Dr True Ott’s radio show claiming that Baxter was incorporating a bioweapon in its vaccine
www.loadedparanormal.com…
KAYNAKÇALAR
*1*
*2* Joseph Moshe (MOSSAD Microbiologist): Swine flu vaccine is bioweapon Friday, August 21, 2009
———————————————————————————————————————-
Related:
Militarization of Swine Flu Preparations
Fear, Intimidation & Media Disinformation: U.K Government is Planning Mass Graves in Case of H1N1 Swine Flu Pandemic
What are Obama’s investments in biotech companies apparently developing the “bird” and “swine” flu vaccine?
Big Pharma: Baxter Files Swine Flu Vaccine Patent a Year Ahead of Outbreak
Charges For Conspiracy Against Mankind
Obama gets billions for ‘pandemic’ Swine Flu
Swine Flu Outbreak Or Bioterrorism And Intent To Commit Mass Murder?
Media sensationalism, corporate power and the swine flu outbreak
Swine Flu: Who Profits?
Swine Flu Created in Lab as Bio-Weapon?
As Swine Flu Spreads, Conspiracy Theories of Laboratory Origins Abound
Who Will Profit from the Deadly Flu This Time?
UK prepares mass graves for swine flu victims
Swine flu drug increases stroke risk
VIDEO – Swine Flu vaccine Baxter linked to Dyncorp´s mercs H1N1 patents
VIDEO – Made in a Lab – The Swine Flu Swindle
VIDEO – ‘Swine flu virus began life in lab’
Mandatory Swine Flu Vaccine Alert
VIDEO – Flashback: 1976 Swine Flu Scam
VIDEO – The Swine Flu Fiasco (CBC, 1983)
VIDEO – Mexican Flu Outbreak 2009: SPECIAL REPORT by Dr Leonard Horowitz
Swine Flu Vaccinations Could Prove More Deadly Than the Swine Flu
Flu is Not the biggest danger… It’s the Vaccine
Next step in H1N1 scare: Microchip implants
Cops jump on swine-flu power: Shots heard ’round the world
Dangerous, Deadly H1N1 Vaccine Scam
Martial Law Alert Over Swine Flu
Nano Particles used in Untested H1N1 Swine Flu Vaccines
Rockefeller and Silverstein implicated in new FBI pandemic
VIDEO Alert: Preparing for the Swine Flu Pandemic: Body Bags for the Canada’s First Nations
Comprehend VeriChip’s Swine Flu Chip
Joseph Moshe (MOSSAD Microbiologist): “Swine flu vaccine is a bioweapon”
VIDEO – The Swine Flu Conspiracy
VIDEO – Dr Len Horowitz – Anglo American Flu Genocide
The “Deadly Second Wave of Swine Flu”. Scaremongering or Sequel of Vaccinations?
A Strengthened Virus and a Police State
Prelude to Final Disaster: Rockefeller´s Depopulation Programme
The Move to Depopulate the Planet
The Population Reduction Agenda For Dummies
Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)
Video: Ron Paul – Putting Swine Flu In Perspective
PRESIDENT OBAMA: I want to extend the warmest of welcomes to Prime Minister Erdogan. I’m glad that I, personally, and the American people have a chance to reciprocate the wonderful hospitality that was extended to me when I visited Turkey in April.
As I said when I had the great honor of addressing the Turkish Parliament in Ankara, I am strongly committed to creating the best possible relationship between Turkey and the United States.
Turkey is a NATO ally, which means that we are pledged to defend each other. There are strong ties between our countries as a consequence of the Turkish American community that has been established here. We have had the opportunity to work together during this recent financial crisis, given Turkey’s role as a member of the G20. And given Turkey’s history as a secular democratic state that respects the rule of law, but is also a majority Muslim nation, it plays a critical role I think in helping to shape mutual understanding and stability and peace not only in its neighborhood but around the world.
During the course of our discussions here, we’ve had the opportunity to survey a wide range of issues that both the United States and Turkey are concerned about. I thanked Prime Minister Erdogan and the Turkish people for their outstanding contributions to stabilizing Afghanistan. We discussed our joint role in helping Iraq achieve the kind of independence and prosperity that I think has been advanced as a consequence of the election law finally being passed over the weekend.
We discussed issues of regional peace, and I indicated to the Prime Minister how important it is to resolve the issue of Iran’s nuclear capacity in a way that allows Iran to pursue peaceful nuclear energy but provides assurances that it will abide by international rules and norms, and I believe that Turkey can be an important player in trying to move Iran in that direction.
And we discussed the continuing role that we can play as NATO allies in strengthening Turkey’s profile within NATO and coordinating more effectively on critical issues like missile defense.
I also congratulated the Prime Minister on some courageous steps that he has taken around the issue of normalizing Turkish/Armenian relations, and encouraged him to continue to move forward along this path.
We reaffirmed the shared commitment to defeat terrorist activity regardless of where it occurs. I expressed condolences to the Prime Minister and the Turkish people for the recent terrorist attack that was taken there and pledged U.S. support in trying to bring the perpetrators of this violence to justice.
And finally, I complimented the Prime Minister for the steps that he’s taken, often very difficult steps, in reintegrating religious minorities and ethnic minorities within Turkey into the democratic and political process, and indicated to him that we want to be as supportive as possible in further steps that he can take, for example, assuring the continuation of the Halki Seminary and addressing the vital needs of continuing the ecumenical patriarchy within Turkey.
Over all, just to summarize, I am incredibly optimistic about the prospect of stronger and stronger ties between the United States and Turkey that will be based not only on our NATO relationship, our military-to-military relationship, our strategic relationship, but also increasing economic ties.
And one of the concrete outcomes of this trip is to follow through on discussions that I had with both Prime Minister Erdogan and President Gul in Turkey to stand up a strategic working group around economic issues and improving commercial ties. That will be launched with the participation of Secretary of Commerce Locke and our U.S. Trade Representative Ambassador Ron Kirk, along with Turkish counterparts. And we think that there is enormous potential for us to grow trade and commercial ties between the two countries.
Turkey is a great country. It is growing in influence around the world. And I am pleased that America can call Turkey a friend, and I’m pleased that I’m able to call Prime Minister Erdogan personally a friend. I’m grateful for his trip here and look forward to many years of collaboration with him to observe both the prosperity of the American people and the Turkish people.
Thank you.
PRIME MINISTER ERDOGAN: (As translated.) Thank you very much. I’m very grateful for the hospitality that both myself and my delegation have been shown since our arrival here. And I would like to once again express my thanks for that hospitality.
The fact that the President visited Turkey on his first overseas trip and that he described and characterized Turkish-U.S. relations as a model partnership has been very important for us politically and in the process that we all look forward to in the future as well. And important steps are now being taken in order to continue to build on our bilateral relations so as to give greater meaning to the term “model partnership.”
Of course, there are many sides to the development of this relationship — be it in the economic area, in the areas of science, art, technology, political areas and military areas.
We have also appointed two people from our side to act as counterparts in order to liaise with their American counterparts to continue on this process. Those two people are the Deputy Prime Minister, Mr. Ali Babacan; and the Minister of State responsible for economic affairs, Mr. Zafer Caglayan on the Turkish side. I do believe that this group is going to work to take the Turkish-American relations forward, not just in the economic area, but in all areas in general.
We, of course, have — we take joint steps on regional issues. This is in the Middle East, in Iraq, with respect to the Iranian nuclear program. We continue to have joint activity in Afghanistan, and the Turkish armed forces have taken over the command of the forces there for a third time with the additional support that we have sent to Afghanistan in the last couple of months. And there are steps that we have taken with respect to training activity and other activities in the context of provisional reconstruction teams, and we continue on that. We’ve had an opportunity to continue discussing those issues during our visit here.
Another important area, of course, is energy. Turkey is a transit country for energy issues. And the agreement has been signed for Nabucco and we are ready to take some important steps with respect to Nabucco.
We continue to talk with Azerbaijan. I do believe that positive progress will be made in this area. In addition to Azerbaijan, of course, there is the importance of companies like Statoil, Total, and British Petroleum and others.
We have also discussed relations between Azerbaijan and Armenia, which is of great importance. This is important in the context of Turkish-Armenian relations. We have discussed the Minsk Group and what the Minsk Group can do — the United States, Russia, and France — to add more impetus to that process. I can say that to have more impetus in the Minsk process is going to have a very positive impact on the overall process, because the normalization process between Turkey and Armenia is very much related to these issues. As the administration in Turkey, we are determined to move forward in this area.
Another important issue with respect for us in Turkey is the fight against terrorism. And there was a statement that was made in this very room on the 5th of November 2007, which was very important in that context, because at the time we had declared the separatist terrorist organization as the common enemy of the United States, Turkey, and Iraq, because terrorism is the enemy of all mankind.
Our sensitivity and response to terrorism is what we have displayed when the twin towers were hit here in the United States. Wherever a terrorist attack takes place our reaction is always the same, because terrorism does not have a religion — a homeland. They have no homeland, no religion whatsoever.
We have also had opportunity to discuss what we can do jointly in the region with regard to nuclear programs. We as Turkey stand ready to do whatever we can to ensure a diplomatic solution to the nuclear issue in our region. And we stand ready as Turkey to do whatever we can do with respect to relations between Israel and the Palestinians, and Israel and Syria, because I do believe that, first and foremost, the United States, too, has important responsibility in trying to achieve global peace.
And we, too, must lend all kinds of support that we can in our regions and — in our respective regions and in the world in general in trying to achieve global peace, because this is not the time to make enemies, it’s the time to make friends. And I believe that we must move hand in hand towards a bright future.
Thank you once again.
PRESIDENT OBAMA: Thank you.
All right, where’s Ben Feller? There you are.
Q Thank you sir. I’d like to ask you briefly about a domestic issue, that being the economy, heading to your speech tomorrow. Do you support the use of federal bailout money to fund job creation programs? Is that an appropriate use of that money? Is that something that you plan to support tomorrow?
PRESIDENT OBAMA: You know, Ben, it would be a mistake for me to step on my speech tomorrow by giving you the headline today.
Q Not that big a mistake. (Laughter.)
PRESIDENT OBAMA: But let me speak generally about what we’ve seen. On Friday we got the best jobs report that we’ve gotten in a very long time. And it significantly beat expectations. At minimum, it showed that for all practical purposes, we’ve stopped losing jobs. And that’s consistent with the fact that in the third quarter we saw the economy grow.
My first job when I came into office was to make sure that we got the financial crisis under control and that we tried to limit the devastating effects that it was having on the real economy. We have had a very tough year, and we’ve lost millions of jobs. But at least now we are moving in the right direction.
What my speech tomorrow will focus on is the fact that having gotten the financial crisis under control. Having finally moved into positive territory when it comes to economic growth, our biggest challenge now is making sure that job growth matches up with economic growth. And what we’ve seen is, is that companies shed jobs very quickly, partly induced by the panic of what was happening on Wall Street, and they are still tentative about hiring back all those people who were laid off. Also what we’re seeing is some long-term trends where companies are becoming so efficient in terms of productivity that they may feel that they can produce the same amount of goods or services without as many employees.
So those present some particular challenges, given the fact that we lost over 3 million jobs just in the first quarter of this year before any of the steps we took had a chance to take effect.
With respect to TARP specifically, I think you saw stories today and you’ve seen stories over the last several weeks that TARP has turned out to be much cheaper than we had expected, although not cheap. It means that some of that money can be devoted to deficit reduction. And the question is are there selective approaches that are consistent with the original goals of TARP — for example, making sure that small businesses are still getting lending — that would be appropriate in accelerating job growth?
And I will be addressing that tomorrow. But I do think that, although we’ve stabilized the financial system, one of the problems that we’re still seeing all the time — and I heard about it when it was in Allentown just this past week — was the fact that small businesses and some medium-sized businesses are still feeling a huge credit crunch. They cannot get the loans that they need to make capital investments that would allow them to then expand employment. And so that’s a particular area where we might be able to make a difference.
Is there somebody in the Turkish delegation that wants to call on a reporter?
Q Mr. President, is there any new and concrete U.S. action plan for disarmament and the elimination of the PKK terror organization in northern Iraq? Thank you, sir.
PRESIDENT OBAMA: Well, what the Prime Minister and I have discussed is coordinating closely in dealing with the problem of the PKK. We have stated before and I have reaffirmed since I came into office that the United States considers PKK a terrorist organization, and that the threat that it poses not only in Turkey but also in Iraq is one that is of deep concern. And as NATO allies, we are bound to help each other defend our territories. More broadly, I think that it is important for us to have a consistent position with respect to terrorism wherever it takes place.
So we discussed how we can coordinate militarily. I will tell you that with respect to the issue of the PKK, I think that the steps that the Prime Minister has taken in being inclusive towards the Kurdish community in Turkey is very helpful, because one of the things we understand is, is that terrorism cannot just be dealt with militarily; there is also social and political components to it that have to be recognized.
With respect to Iraq, I think the degree to which the Kurdish population within Iraq feels effectively represented within the central government in Baghdad, to the extent that we can resolve some long-term pressing issues like Kirkuk, the more I think that Kurds will recognize that their interests are not in supporting any kind of military activity but rather in working through conflicts politically, in a way that allows everybody to be prosperous. And that’s the kind of process that we would encourage.
Okay? Thank you very much, everybody. Happy holidays.
WASHINGTON – President Barack Obama has failed to persuade the prime minister of Turkey of the need for sanctions against Iran.
Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan (REH’-jehp TY’-ihp UR’-doh-wahn) stressed at a press conference following his White House meeting, that persuading Iran to give up its nuclear ambitions should be left to diplomacy.
He said that he expressed Turkey’s willingness to mediate negotiations between Iran and the West. But he also criticized current sanctions against Iran as being ineffective because of loopholes for Western goods to reach the Iranian market.
The Obama administration may seek new sanctions against Iran in the United Nations Security Council, where Turkey currently votes as a non-permanent member.
THIS IS A BREAKING NEWS UPDATE. Check back soon for further information. AP’s earlier story is below.
WASHINGTON (AP) — Seeking more help in the war in Afghanistan, President Barack Obama praised Turkey for its “outstanding” contributions there.
Speaking in the Oval Office after a private meeting with Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Obama said Turkey’s commitments have helped bring stability to Afghanistan. Turkey took over the rotating command of the NATO peacekeeping operation in Kabul last month and doubled its number of troops to around 1,750. However, it has resisted repeated U.S. requests to send its troops on combat operations.
Last week, Obama ordered 30,000 more U.S. troops be sent to Afghanistan. The administration expects its allies to provide up to 10,000 reinforcements.
Obama also expressed his condolences for a recent terrorist attack in Turkey, and said the two leaders reaffirmed their commitment to defeat terrorism “regardless of where it occurs.”
At least five Turkish soldiers were killed and several others wounded in an ambush Monday in central Turkey. Authorities have not identified the attackers but Kurdish and leftist militants are active in the area.
Monday’s meeting between the two leaders comes at a time of rising Turkish influence in the Middle East and Central Europe. Before leaving for Washington, Erdogan said Turkey has already contributed the “necessary number” of troops in Afghanistan, and that Turkish military and police will train their Afghan counterparts and press ahead with health, education and infrastructure projects there.
Turkey’s participation in the Afghan mission carries enormous symbolic importance because it is the only Muslim country working with U.S. troops to beat back the resurgent Taliban and deny al-Qaida a sanctuary.
More broadly, however, the United States would like Turkey to use its sway as a regional power and Muslim majority ally to help solve some of America’s trickiest foreign policy problems. But the two sides disagree on many of the important issues.
Turkey has sought to become a mediator for the United States with Iran and Arab countries, but it is unclear whether the Obama administration is eager for Ankara to play that role. The two sides disagree on sanctions against Iran and the Obama administration is uneasy about recent Turkish disputes with Israel.
Greater friction is looming as the Obama administration intensifies pressure on Iran to end its nuclear ambitions. A U.S. push for sanctions at the U.N. Security Council, where Turkey currently sits as a nonpermanent member, will force Ankara to choose between a NATO ally and an important neighbor.
The two allies also will need to navigate the perennial issue of an annual U.S. statement on the World War I-era massacre of up to 1.5. million Armenians by Ottoman Turks. Breaking a campaign pledge, Obama has refrained from referring to the killings as genocide, a term widely viewed by genocide scholars as an accurate description.
The Obama administration has said it is wary that the sensitive issue could upset talks that could lead to reconciliation and a reopening of the border between Armenia and Turkey. It remains unclear how the administration will handle the issue in the future, especially if talks between Turkey and Armenia falter.
Tensions have eased over cooperation in Northern Iraq. Turkish complaints about a lack of U.S. help in rooting out Kurdish militants launching attacks on Turkey from Iraq loomed over Erdogan’s White House visit with former President George W. Bush in 2007.
Since then Turkey has boosted trade in the region and improved ties with members of the Kurdish minorities living on both sides of its border with Iraq.
