Tag: churches of istanbul

  • Religious freedom for Turkey?

    Religious freedom for Turkey?

    By Elizabeth H. Prodromou and Nina Shea (USCIRF) – 08/26/11 10:12 AM ET

    The recent resignation of Turkey’s military high command, along with reports that Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan will subordinate the military to civilian rule, could mark a new era for that nation.  Sweeping constitutional changes, however, are still needed to ensure fundamental rights and avoid exchanging one form of repression for another.  The United States should challenge Turkey’s civilian leadership to make such long-overdue changes, especially regarding religious freedom, including for religious minorities.

    While Turkey has long been a formal democracy, it has been a decidedly imperfect one.  Since Kemal Ataturk founded the Republic of Turkey in 1923, his rigid state secularism has stifled religious freedom.  Restrictions have hindered the majority Sunni Muslim community and have discriminated against and threatened religious minority communities, including Greek, Armenian, and Syriac Orthodox Churches; Catholic and Protestant Churches; the Jewish community; and the Alevis.

    Constitutionally, the military was the protector of the secular state apparatus that engaged in or tolerated religious freedom violations.  Indeed, the context for the recent military resignations was Erdoğan’s refusal to promote officers who allegedly plotted within Ergenekon, a clandestine ultranationalist group, to topple his Islamic-oriented government and commit violence against numerous faith communities and their houses of worship.
    As the inheritor of this legacy, Erdoğan and his AK Party have faced an uphill battle to deepen Turkey’s democratic institutions and culture.  Their moves to bolster civilian rule have positive implications for respecting international human rights norms, including religious freedom.

    Indeed, the AKP government has widened the opening for public religious expression, which has helped Turkey’s Sunni Muslim majority.  Since 2007, imams have had some autonomy in drafting their sermons.   While the ban on religious dress in state institutions continues, last month, the Council of State overturned Turkey’s high court ruling which had barred the wearing of headscarves during the Selection Examination for Academic Personnel and Graduate Studies.  Enrollment in Imam-Hatip religious schools has expanded notably.  Without a doubt, Sunni Islam flourishes.
    When it comes to religious minorities, however, Turkey’s record remains disappointing.

    To be sure, the AKP government has ushered in some improvements, including the addition of worship services allowed for a particular church, citizenship for the leaders of another, accurate national identity cards for converts, and continued engagement with Alevis. Yet, Turkey’s widely publicized constitutional reform process currently omits any attention to religious freedom, thereby suggesting no systematic relief for Turkey’s smallest minorities, such as Christians and Jews.

    Turkey’s Christian minority has dwindled to just 0.15 percent of the country.  In the words of one church leader, it is an “endangered species.”  In past centuries, violence exacted a horrific toll on Turkey’s Christians and their churches.  This provides a frightening context and familiar continuity to a number of recent high-profile murders by ultranationalists.

    Turkey’s Jewish community also fears a reprise of past violence, such as the 2003 al Qaeda-linked Istanbul synagogue bombings.   Societal anti-Semitism has been fueled in recent years by Erdoğan’s rhetoric against Israel’s activity in the Middle East and by negative portrayals in Turkey’s state-run media.
    Today, however, it is the state’s dense web of regulations that most threatens Turkey’s religious minorities.

    Religious communities are being strangled by legal restrictions on internal governance, education, houses of worship and wider property rights. It is difficult even to have a frank national discussion about their plight; those who have tried can face constitutional charges for insulting “Turkishness”, as well as a broader climate of impunity.

    One example of the oppressive regulatory climate is the meddling in internal governance, as seen in the interference in the election procedure for the acting Armenian Patriarch, as well as in the refusal to recognize the title of “ecumenical” of the Greek Orthodox Church’s Ecumenical Patriarch and the inherited titles of Alevi leaders.

    Another is the government’s refusal to allow non-Muslim clergy to be trained in Turkey.  The military’s shuttering in 1971 of the Greek Orthodox Theological School of Halki, once the educational center for global Orthodox Christianity, is a case in point.   Successive governments’ policies have put at risk the very survival of the Ecumenical Patriarchate and its Greek Orthodox flock.

    A third example is the expropriation of land from the 1,600-year-old Mor Gabriel Monastery, the world’s oldest Syriac Orthodox monastery.  Last January, Turkey’s Supreme Court granted its treasury parts of the monastery’s territory.  Besides impacting the church, such arbitrary state expropriations encourage acts of impunity against all religious minorities.

    Finally, there is the status of the Alevis, the nation’s largest religious minority.  Turkey refuses legal recognition of Alevi meeting places (cemevi) as houses of worship, and has denied them construction permits.

    These examples underscore how Turkey’s religious minorities still lack full legal status and are deprived of full rights as citizens.   To help remedy this injustice, the United States should urge Erdoğan to fulfill his pledge to amend the military-drafted constitution of 1982 by making changes in line with religious freedom and the other human rights guarantees found in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which Turkey ratified.

    By strengthening civilian control, Turkey has an opportunity to chart a clearer course toward greater freedom for all its citizens.  It’s time for the country’s leaders to embrace constitutional reform, end impunity, protect religious diversity, and advance religious freedom for every citizen.

    Elizabeth H. Prodromou serves as Vice Chair of the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF).  Nina Shea serves as a USCIRF Commissioner.  Both authors traveled to Turkey in February 2011 as part of a USCIRF delegation.

  • Ricciardone Revises Response to Senate Inquiry on Number of Churches in Turkey

    Ricciardone Revises Response to Senate Inquiry on Number of Churches in Turkey

    US Amb. to Turkey Francis Ricciardone
    US Amb. to Turkey Francis Ricciardone

    WASHINGTON — US Ambassador to Turkey Francis Ricciardone, responding to a wave of grassroots outrage and growing Congressional concern, backed away fromhis most obvious and offensive misrepresentations about Turkey’s destruction of Christian churches, but sparked renewed controversy by artificially inflating the number of currently operating Christian houses of worship, and again using strained euphemisms to help Ankara escape responsibility for its crimes, reported the Armenian National Committee of America (ANCA).

    Following broad-based concerns expressed by Armenian-American community and religious leaders, Ricciardone amended his earlier response to Senate Foreign Relations Committee member Robert Menendez (D-NJ), in which he had argued, without any basis in fact, that a majority of Christian churches operating in the territory of present-day Turkey prior to 1915 were still functioning today.

    In a correction obtained by the ANCA on August 22, Ricciardone took the “opportunity to clarify the record,” suggesting that of the 2,000 churches there before 1915, they are not all still functioning. He said, “The corrected text should read as follows: Most of the Christian churches functioning prior to 1915 are no longer operating as churches. Christian community contacts in Turkey report that a total of 200-250 churches that date to 1915 and before offer Christian worship services at least once a year. Many churches do not offer services every week due to insufficient clergy or local Christian populations. Some churches of significance operate as museums, others have been converted into mosques or put to other uses. Still others have fallen into disrepair or may have been totally destroyed.”

    “It took Ambassador Ricciardone, with the help of his many State Department colleagues, over a week to submit in writing a patently false misrepresentation about the destruction of Christian churches in Turkey, and another 10 days and a full wave of Senate and citizen pressure for him to finally take half a step back from the most offensive and obviously incorrect aspects of his response,” said ANCA Executive Director Aram Hamparian.

    “He just keeps digging himself into a deeper hole as an apologist for Ankara. His use of false figures and euphemisms to try to twist his way out of his misrepresentation — while somehow still trying to stick to Turkey’s genocide denial narrative — clearly confirms that Ambassador Ricciardone is not the right representative of US values and interests in Turkey.”

    Last week, in a strongly-worded letter to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, ANCA Chairman Ken Hachikian demanded a retraction, correction and apology for Ambassador Ricciardone’s statement covering-up Ottoman and Republican Turkey’s systematic destruction of thousands of Christian churches.

    “We have been troubled by his eagerness to embrace the government of Turkey’s false and hateful genocide denial narrative, at lengths beyond even the Administration’s longstanding and shameful complicity in Turkey’s denials of the Armenian Genocide,” stated Hachikian in his August 15 letter. “His verbal and written responses to questions during his Senate confirmation process, regarding the Armenian Genocide and other issues, ranged from evasive to deeply offensive.”

    Archbishop Oshagan Choloyan and Archbishop Moushegh Mardirossian, prelates of the Armenian Apostolic Church of America Eastern and Western United States, respectively, and Archbishop Khajag Barsamian, Primate of the Diocese of the Armenian Apostolic Church, Eastern United States, each issued powerfully-worded spiritual messages in response to the ambassador’s statement.

    In an August 15 statement, Choloyan stressed that the ambassador’s assertion was “so blatantly false that it cannot remain unchallenged.” Setting the record straight, he noted that: “The facts are quite clear. From the massacres of Armenians in 1895-96 and the Armenian Genocide in 1915, to the decades following the establishment of the Turkish republic, Christian houses of worship were systematically destroyed or confiscated. My own church’s hierarchal see, the Armenian Catholicosate of Cilicia, was a victim of this process, and today is exiled in Lebanon. The archives of the Catholicosate contain hundreds of original deeds and other documentation of churches and church owned property that was confiscated.”

    Mardirossian concurred, stating, “The presence of an Ambassador in Ankara who is unaware of or uninterested in the truth and the consequences of the Ottoman and Republican Turkish government’s genocide of Armenians, Assyrians, Syriacs, Greeks and other Christians materially undermines US interests, compromises American values and weakens international efforts to defend religious freedom for peoples of all faiths. Sadly, but unmistakably, with this hateful and hurtful statement, Ambassador Ricciardone has demonstrated that he is not the right candidate to effectively and responsibly represent the United States in Turkey.”

    On August 19, Barsamian noted that Ricciardone’s response had “deeply offended Armenian- Americans,” explaining that “the loss of these many hundreds of churches, their neglect and outright destruction, and the conversion of many of our sanctuaries into mosques, is a matter of intense pain to Armenians: an ongoing reminder of the loss of life and the destruction that we suffered as a result of the 1915 Genocide… In all charity, perhaps the Ambassador is simply unaware of certain facts. But mastery of the history of a country, its dark as well as bright chapters, is essential to serving the United States effectively and diplomatically in this important and complex region.” (See the full text of his statement on this page.)

    According to Armenian Church experts, of the more than 2,000 churches serving the Armenian community prior to 1915, less than 40 are functioning as churches today. Reservations about the ambassador’s readiness to placate his foreign hosts willingness to accept the Turkish government’s talking points on religious tolerance at face value echo concerns expressed last fall by then Sen. Sam Brownback (R-KS), who, during the last session of Congress, placed a hold on Ricciardone’s nomination to serve as US ambassador to Turkey. In an August 16, 2010, letter to Clinton, Brownback voiced disapproval of Ricciardone’s tenure as US ambassador to Egypt, noting, among other things, that “he quickly adopted the positions and arguments of his Egyptian diplomatic counterparts.”

    In the wake of Brownback’s hold, President Barack Obama circumvented Senate objections by issuing a “recess appointment” of Ricciardone. The Senate must approve his nomination in the upcoming months, if Ricciardone is to continue to serve in Turkey for more than one year, of the usual three-year ambassadorial term. The Senate Foreign Relations Committee will likely take up his nomination upon their return from the August Congressional recess.

  • RA Diaspora Minister visits Armenian churches of Istanbul

    RA Diaspora Minister visits Armenian churches of Istanbul

    armenianministerPanARMENIAN.Net – The Global Summit of Women with participation of around 1,000 representatives from 82 countries is under way in Istanbul.

    As part of the event, Armenian Minister of Diaspora Hranush Hakobyan participated in the forum for first ladies, as well as Global Women’s Leadership awards ceremony.

    On May 7, the closing ceremony of the Global Summit of Women will take place with participation of UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon.

    Hakobyan met with representatives of the Armenian community and visited Armenian churches and cemeteries of Istanbul, the Ministry’s press service reported.

    She also visited Armenian gymnasium to brief on programs implemented by the Ministry of Diaspora.

    via RA Diaspora Minister visits Armenian churches of Istanbul – PanARMENIAN.Net.

  • Textile Treasures from the Orthodox Churches of Istanbul

    Textile Treasures from the Orthodox Churches of Istanbul

    Constantinople (nytimes.com) — It began with a question 13 years ago from the owner of a shop in the Grand Bazaar. The answer has led two American researchers to conduct the first detailed study of rarely seen sacred treasures belonging to the Armenian Patriarchate of Istanbul and to the creation of an underground museum to house the priceless artifacts.

    armenian

     

    In their 397-page book, “Splendor & Pageantry: Textile Treasures from the Orthodox Churches of Istanbul,” Ronald T. Marchese, Marlene R. Breu and the Armenian Patriarchate expand what little was known about the unheralded role of women in the church and colorfully record the skills of women artisans who stitched their devotion onto luscious silks and velvets.

    The objects they studied, some more than 300 years old, include sumptuously embroidered liturgical vestments, silk altar curtains, velvet copes decorated with gold or silver threads and pearl-encrusted miters, gathered from churches that served the Armenian population. Common embroidery motifs included stars, birds, vine leaves and angels, their faces sometimes sewn using human hair.

    The museum itself houses such textiles as well as paintings and objects of precious metals from Armenian churches throughout Turkey which can be viewed, by appointment only, in the basement museum of the patriarchate in the humble Kumkapi neighborhood of Istanbul. The museum, created with donations from local Armenians and the European Capital of Culture 2010 organization, sits atop centuries-old ruins, discovered during renovations after the 1999 earthquake, that have since become a chapel.

    Mr. Marchese, a professor of ancient history and archaeology at the University of Minnesota at Duluth, was conducting other research in Turkey in 1998 “when a good Armenian friend that I have known for over 25 years, Mr. Murat Bilir, approached me one day to ask if I would be interested in examining religious textiles at a church in the old Armenian quarter.

    “Mr. Bilir knew Payel Gulludere, the then-chairman of the board of directors of the church, who wanted to know what was in the storage depot and who made them,” he said.

    “The first piece I examined,” Mr. Marchese said during an interview by e-mail, “was a brilliant blue silk cloth, embroidered with an image of Mary and the Christ Child.” Impressed by the objects’ workmanship, iconography and the dedication inscriptions, which helped to date the textiles, Mr. Marchese contacted Ms. Breu, who examined the objects the following year.

    armenian1

    Then, with the blessing of Patriarch Mesrob II, the researchers began to “record the brilliance of the material and put a ‘face’ on the unknown artisans who created a phenomenal body of material culture, from the monumental to the miniature,” Mr. Marchese said.

    Ms. Breu, retired professor of textile studies at Western Michigan University in Kalamazoo, said during an e-mail interview that “what we didn’t know at the outset was the great depth and breadth of the material — brilliant artifacts of great historical and artistic value.

    “Archbishop Aram Atesyan had already begun archiving the artifacts in the various Armenian Orthodox Churches in the city. He became our guide, teacher and good friend through the long and arduous process of identifying, selecting, collecting, studying, photographing and archiving.

    “Our adventures,” she said, “took us on ferries, buses, taxis and hikes, often with frustration resulting from inadequate maps for finding the churches on both the European and Asian sides of the city. We visited treasuries, often in the far reaches of church buildings, met church members, most of whom were excited to learn we were studying their precious objects. Sometimes we had to leave behind spectacular pieces because of our inability to gain access for a variety of reasons.” Some items, for example, were preserved behind glass and could not be disturbed without damaging them.

    The earlier pieces, Mr. Marchese said, “provide a link with an older tradition that doesn’t survive except in examples expressed in more concrete forms — like wall paintings, frescos, mosaics.”

    “We were struck by the anatomical accuracy of the Crucifixion, the stretched muscles of Christ depicted on the cross were accurate,” he said. “The artisan captured such scenes in a sensitive display of emotion and passion — but in miniature”

    armenian2

    According to Ms. Breu: “The most significant piece in terms of skill level is a miter dated 1800.

    “The embroiderer used a wide variety of yarn types and stitches,” she said. “The workmanship is so fine that the face of the centurion watching in amazement at the resurrection of Christ is created in a three-by-two-centimeter area,” or six square centimeters, which is less than one square inch.

    “The face is executed in smooth silk floss offset against the heavier textural quality of the surrounding metal, with detail so exacting as to depict wrinkled skin and single strands of facial hair,” Ms. Breu added.

    In another very detailed miter, Mary is framed with pearls as she stands on a serpent with an apple in its mouth.

    “I have always wondered what the women of this great geography were doing as their men designed and built the magnificent monuments and fought in the many wars waged on these lands,” said Nancy Ozturk, coordinator of Citlembik, which published the book. “And now a bit of this puzzle has been solved.”

    “The congregations, mostly illiterate at the time, ‘read’ the Gospel stories through the images on the cloth and were awestruck — as we are — by the richness of the silk cloth, the colorful embroidery and the generous use of precious jewels,” she said.

    Ornate textiles are still being used in church services, often the only place people could get glimpses of them. “But many are irreplaceable,” said Father Tatoul Anoushian during a recent tour of the five-room museum. “The church established two girls’ schools in the 1820s just for this kind of work. But unfortunately we haven’t got anyone now with the skills needed to produce new ones.”

    armenian3

    More than 70 churches served the Armenian Christian population of Istanbul at the beginning of the 20th century, but only about 30 survive, the researchers say, as the cultural heart of a population decimated by the genocide — a term disputed by Turkey — that began in during World War I.

    It is rare to find such a trove of cloth-based items that merit study. “Textile objects, because of their ephemeral nature, do not last long, especially when they are used, as they were in the Celebration of the Divine Liturgy,” Ms. Breu said. Many other examples were destroyed by the many fires that plagued Istanbul and its wooden buildings over the centuries.

    “The importance of textile objects is often minimized because they come from a tradition of ‘women’s work’ usually associated with the home,” Ms. Breu said. “But these objects illustrate the skill and devotion of Armenian women to their church. It offered them a means of self-expression in the public sector and of participation in their religious rituals.”

    Some of the more fascinating items include the oldest dated miter from 1681, another that lacks a date but is believed to be about a century older, and a pair of liturgical slippers intricately adorned on the soles with images of a scorpion and a snake, a sort of final barrier between the priest and evil temptations. There are also tunic collars for choir members, veils for covering the chalice, banners, crowns, canopies, cases for patriarchal staffs, altar curtains and kerchiefs for the handling of crosses.

    “It was truly a labor of love,” Ms. Breu said, “with the usual difficulties and delights, but with immeasurable rewards.”

    Not the least of these, she said, was adding to “the empowerment of Istanbul Armenians to celebrate their important past.”

    Posted by Josephus Flavius