Tag: Brookings Institution

  • Global anti-terrorism fund grants would battle radicalization process

    Global anti-terrorism fund grants would battle radicalization process

    NEW YORK, Sept. 27 (UPI) — U.S. officials hope a $200 million fund will be effective in stemming extremism by eroding jihadists’ ideological and recruiting appeal in havens for terrorists.

    20130425_radical_islam_shhh_LARGEThe U.S. State Department said diplomats from the United States and Turkey Friday plan to announce a $200 million fund to help prevent the radicalization process used by terrorists, The New York Times reported.

    The new Global Fund for Community Engagement and Resilience will, for the first time, combine financing from government and non-government entities to identify credible local organizations; develop, monitor and evaluate programs; and channel funds to local projects that target groups and individuals vulnerable to appeals from terrorist groups, officials said. The fund is expected to be operational by the middle of 2014.

    The initiative is to be announced by U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry and Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu during a meeting of foreign ministers of the Global Counterterrorism Forum in New York. The United States and Turkey lead the organization of 29 countries and the European Union that acts as a clearinghouse of ideas and actions for civilian counter-terrorism specialists.

    “Countries that have a radicalization problem previously had to rely on ad hoc support from wealthier donor nations, many of which are not bureaucratically capable of sponsoring the small intervention programs necessary to disrupt the radicalization process,” William McCants, a former State Department counter-terrorism official now with the Brookings Institution, told the Times. “Now countries can turn to the global fund to sponsor programs that will pull young men and women back from the edge of terrorist violence.”

    The United States is expected to contribute between $2 million and $3 million initially to the fund, which will be administered in Geneva, Switzerland. Besides Turkey, other likely donors include the European Union, Canada, Qatar, Denmark, Britain and private sources.

    U.S. officials said the fund is expected to raise more than $200 million over a 10-year period.

    Fund grants would provide vocational training to youths at risk of being recruited by terrorist organizations, U.S. officials said. Funds also would be channeled to new school curricula that teach tolerance and problem-solving, along with underwriting websites and social networks that would educate youth about the dangers of violent extremist ideologies.

    Topics: John Kerry, Ahmet Davutoglu, Brookings Institution

    via Global anti-terrorism fund grants would battle radicalization process – UPI.com.

  • Iran and Turkey After Egypt: Time for Regional Realignments?

    Iran and Turkey After Egypt: Time for Regional Realignments?

    Download Full Paper (PDF)

    U.S.-Europe Analysis | Number 51

    Iran and Turkey After Egypt: Time for Regional Realignments?

    Iran, Turkey, Middle East Unrest, Middle East, Transatlantic Relations

    Emiliano Alessandri, Former Visiting Fellow, Center on the United States and Europe

    Ruth H. Santini, Visiting Fellow, Foreign Policy, Center on the United States and Europe

    The Brookings Institution

    Download Full Paper (PDF)

    April 19, 2011 —

    INTRODUCTION

    ahmadinejad gulBoth Iran and Turkey have a major stake in how the political landscape in North Africa and the Middle East is reshaped in the months ahead. Tehran and Ankara have developed their own separate narratives on regional events that take credit for providing the political inspiration for the Arab uprisings. Simultaneously, they have aimed to reinterpret reality on the ground to deflect attention away from their own domestic problems. While regional uprisings (with the possible exception of a resurgence of Kurdish separatism) do not necessarily threaten the stability of the Turkish state, Iran is experiencing its own waves of protests.

    U.S.-Europe Analysis

    Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (R) and his Turkish counterpart Abdullah Gul attend an official meeting in Tehran February 14, 2011.

    Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (R) and his Turkish counterpart Abdullah Gul attend an official meeting in Tehran February 14, 2011.

    As European and American leaders formulate policies toward North Africa and the Middle East, Iran and Turkey will have to be factored in and engaged in very different ways. This commentary offers a snapshot of Iranian and Turkish perceptions and reactions to the democratic protests in the Arab world, and explores ways in which the United States and the European Union might interact with Tehran and Ankara in channeling the currents of change.

    In Iran’s initial public commentary on the first uprisings in Tunisia and Egypt, Iranian leaders portrayed the protests as “Islamic awakenings” inspired by Iran’s 1979 revolution. As events in Libya unfolded, the Iranian narrative shifted away from the protests to criticize the United States and its allies for staging a military intervention, and for being motivated—according to Iranian leaders—primarily by oil interests. Tehran’s narrative on Libya pointedly ignored United Nations Security Council (UNSC) resolution 1973, and the endorsement of the Arab League for the intervention.

    Download Full Paper (PDF)

    via Iran and Turkey After Egypt: Time for Regional Realignments? – Brookings Institution.