The former press secretary of President George W. Bush says he backs Democratic presidential hopeful Barack Obama for the November election.
25 Ekim 2008 Cumartesi 04:28
|
|
will be voting for Barack Obama,” Scott McClellan said, according to the transcript of an interview to be broadcast on CNN’s Larry King Live on Friday.
McClellan also said he has always planned to support a candidate that has the best chance for changing the way Washington works and getting things done. McClellan, who was Bush’s chief spokesman from July 2003 to April 2006, is the second former administration official to back Obama in a week after Bush’s first secretary of state Colin Powell. On Sunday, Powell in an interview on NBC’s Meet the Press endorsed Obama, saying ‘I think that Senator Obama brings a fresh set of eyes, fresh set of ideas to the table’. Earlier this year McClellan sharply criticized President Bush for the Iraq war in his book, ‘What Happened: Inside the Bush White House and Washington’s Culture of Deception’.
He wrote in his book, “History appears poised to confirm what most Americans today have decided that the decision to invade Iraq was a serious strategic blunder. The perception of this catastrophe was made worse by previous decisions President Bush had made, including, first and foremost, the failure to be open and forthright on Iraq and rushing to war with inadequate planning and preparation for its aftermath.” After the book released, the White House said Bush was surprised and saddened about it. Meanwhile, The New York Times in a Thursday editorial endorsed the Democratic presidential hopeful, saying Obama had ‘met challenge after challenge, growing as a leader and putting real flesh on his early promises of hope and change’. The Times posted its endorsement on its website on Thursday evening and was to publish it in Friday editions of the newspaper. |
Tag: Barack Obama
-
Former Bush spokesman endorses Obama
-
AMERIKADA SECIM HILELERI VE OBAMA – A Mighty Hoax from ACORN Grows
Published on Monday, October 20, 2008 by CommonDreams.org
by Michael Winship
ACORN and election fraud. Hang on. As soon as I can get the alligator that crawled out of my toilet back into the New York City sewers where it belongs, I can turn my attention to this very important topic.
You see, the ACORN “election fraud” story is one of those urban legends, like fake moon landings and alligators in the sewers, and it appears three or four weeks before every recent national election with the regularity of the swallows returning to Capistrano.
First, the basics: ACORN, which stands for the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, is an activist group working with low and moderate income families that, among many other things, registers voters. To do this they hire people to go around signing up the unregistered, killing two birds with one stone — giving employment to people who need it (some with criminal records) and providing the opportunity to vote to members of minority communities whose voices all too often go unheard.
What happens is that some of those hired to do the registering, who are paid by the name, make people up. As a result, you’ll discover that among the registrants are such obvious fakes as Mickey Mouse and the starting line-up of the Dallas Cowboys, among others.
This is where the Republican meme kicks in. As they have in past elections (although now louder and more angrily than ever), the GOP has made ACORN the red flag du jour as the party tries to mobilize its conservative base and, allegedly, attempts to suppress the vote and distract attention from accusations of election tampering made against them, too.
The charge is that these fake registrations will create havoc at the polls. On Tuesday morning, former Republican Senators John Danforth and Warren Rudman, chairs of Senator McCain’s Honest and Open Elections Committee, held a press conference and described the results of the bad seeds in ACORN’s registration program as “a potential nightmare.” Danforth said he was concerned “that this election night and the days that follow will be a rerun of 2000, and even worse than 2000.”
John McCain raised it at Wednesday night’s final debate and went further, adding, “We need to know the full extent of Senator Obama’s relationship with ACORN, who [sic] is now on the verge of maybe perpetrating one of the greatest frauds in voter history in this country, maybe destroying the fabric of democracy…”
Obama replied, “ACORN is a community organization. Apparently, what they have done is they were paying people to go out and register folks. And apparently, some of the people who were out there didn’t really register people; they just filled out a bunch of names. Had nothing to do with us. We were not involved.”
Which is not to say Obama has not been associated with ACORN in the recent past. He has. As he said in the debate, as a lawyer, he joined with the group in partnership with the US Justice Department to implement a motor voter registration law in Illinois — allowing folks to register to vote at their local DMV. His work as a community organizer bought him into contact with ACORN, the organization received money from the Woods Fund while he was a board member there and his presidential campaign gave ACORN more than $800,000 to help with get out the vote campaigns during the primary season — but not, apparently, for registration drives.
All of this distracts from several important points. ACORN has registered 1.3 million voters, and maintains that in virtually every instance they are the ones who have reported the incidents of fraud.
As the organization asserted in a response to Senator McCain, “ACORN hired 13,000 field workers to register people to vote. In any endeavor of this size, some people will engage in inappropriate conduct. ACORN has a zero tolerance policy and terminated any field workers caught engaging in questionable activity. At the end of the day, as ACORN is paying these people to register voters, it is ACORN that is defrauded.” Arrests have been made, as well they should be.
Add to this the simple fact that registration fraud is not election fraud. Seventy-five, made-up people who are registered as, say, “Brad Pitt,” are not likely going to show up at some polling place on November 4 to vote in the election. Because they don’t exist. (Besides, Angelina would never give them time off from babysitting duties.)
Granted, there are ways to mail in an absentee ballot under a fake name and, too, from time to time some joker is going to come to the polls and try to bluff his or her way in. But despite the charge that thousands and thousands of fakes will flood the machines and throw the count, it does not happen very often. And according to ACORN, “Even RNC [Republican National Committee] General Counsel Sean Cairncross has recently acknowledged he is not aware of a single improper vote cast as a result of bad cards submitted in the course of an organized voter registration effort.”
Not that this has stopped the GOP from banging the same drum every national election. And amnesiac members of the media and some government agencies from buying into it every time. Last year, The New York Times reported that the federal Election Assistance Commission, created by the Help America Vote Act, legislation enacted after the Florida debacle, was told by a pair of experts — one Republican, the other described as having “liberal leanings” — that there was not that much fraud to be found. But their conclusions were downplayed.
As per the Times, “Though the original report said that among experts ‘there is widespread but not unanimous agreement that there is little polling place fraud,’ the final version of the report released to the public concluded in its executive summary that ‘there is a great deal of debate on the pervasiveness of fraud.’”
Which raises the ongoing investigation of the Justice Department’s firing of those eight US attorneys shortly after President Bush’s re-election. It shouldn’t be forgotten that despite official explanations, half of them were let go after refusing to prosecute vote fraud charges demanded by Republicans. The attorneys had determined there was little or no evidence of skullduggery; certainly not enough to prosecute.
(In an interview with Talking Points Memo on Thursday, one of those fired, David Iglesias, reacted to reports that the FBI has launched an investigation of ACORN: “I’m astounded that this issue is being trotted out again. Based on what I saw in 2004 and 2006, it’s a scare tactic.”)
What’s equally if not more scary are continued allegations of Republican attempts at “caging” minority voters — making challenge lists of African- and Hispanic-Americans registered in heavily Democratic districts. Just this week, a Federal judge in Michigan ruled that voters could not be purged from the rolls in that state simply because their mailing address was invalid — this followed a failed attempt by a Michigan Republican county chairman to use a list of foreclosed homes as the basis of voter challenges.
This comes on the heels of a recent report from the Brennan Center at New York University documenting how state officials — often with the best of intentions — purge huge numbers of perfectly legal voters from the rolls.
As my colleague Bill Moyers reported, “Hundreds of thousands of legal voters may have been dumped in recent years, many without ever being notified.” The report describes a “process that is shrouded in secrecy, prone to error, and vulnerable to manipulation.”
Hardly reassuring words if you want democracy to work, and sadly, not an urban legend, but the simple truth.
Michael Winship is senior writer of the weekly public affairs program Bill Moyers Journal, which airs Friday night on PBS. Check local airtimes or comment at The Moyers Blog at www.pbs.org/moyers. -
Obama fights ‘Jewish problem’
BY CHRIS MEGERIAN Cox News Service
Illinois Senator Barack Obama appears to have less support from Jews than previous Democratic candidates.
WASHINGTON — Halie Soifer is building an army.
Assembled in her Delray Beach office are more than 20 people, mostly seniors and all Jewish, who have been drafted into the campaign to elect Barack Obama president.
Each of them is armed with a series of talking points and a pin with the candidate’s name in Hebrew. Then they are deployed to the condominiums and gated communities of Palm Beach County.
CRUCIAL VOTES
For Soifer, the campaign’s Jewish vote director in Florida, these are some of her most crucial foot soldiers.
Palm Beach County Jews are becoming a battleground demographic in a battleground state. That’s because Obama could have the least Jewish support of any Democratic presidential candidate since Jimmy Carter faced Ronald Reagan in 1980.
A national poll released Thursday by the American Jewish Committee has him leading McCain 57 to 30 percent among Jewish voters, with 13 percent undecided.
The numbers are evidence of how Jews have trended, if only slightly, to the political right in recent years.
Republicans have been gaining ground in the last few presidential elections. From 1992 to 2004, the percentage of Jews voting Republican doubled to 22 percent.
“With Obama polling at historic lows among Jewish voters, this kind of shift in a close election could have an important impact in the outcome of the race,” said Matthew Brooks, president of the Republican JewishCoalition.
OBAMA’S ‘PROBLEM’
Obama has been accused of having a “Jewish problem” ever since polls showed greater Jewishsupport for Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., in the primary battle. Conservative critics say his willingness to meet with Iranian President Ahmadinejad, an idea the RJC calls “naive and dangerous,” is evidence of his lax support for Israel. It’s an image he’s sought to dispel, repeatedly stating his opposition to a nuclear armed Iran.
On Sept. 8, his campaign announced the launch of six Obama Jewish Community Leadership Committees in Florida to directly engage voters on a grass-roots level.
Kenneth Wald, a political science professor at the University of Florida who studies Jewish voting behavior, said Jewish voters have simply been unfamiliar with Obama, some knowing little more than he has an Arabic middle name, Hussein. “There is a question [whether] someone of that background will be someone that Jews will feel comfortable with,” Wald said.
Source: Miami Herald Sunday, 28 Sep 2008
-
McCain and Obama Tackle Your Questions -VIDEO
Dear Kayaalp Buyukataman,President Turkish Forum
21,687 AARP Activists sent us questions to ask McCain and Obama at the issue forum this past weekend – find out how the Senators responded!
Click here to watch Senator McCain’s interview.
Click here to watch Senator Obama’s interview.
Last weekend, over 21,000 of you sent questions to be given to Senators McCain and Obama when they appeared live before AARP activists this past weekend.
AARP CEO Bill Novelli passed them on to the Senators – but he also asked several of your questions in front of the cameras, and a national audience.
If you didn’t get a chance to see the issue forum, check it out now!
Click here to watch Senator McCain’s interview with Bill Novelli.
Click here to watch Senator Obama’s interview with Bill Novelli.
Political events always move swiftly – this opportunity to interview the Senators came together with less than 24 hours’ notice. Yet in that time, 21,687 of you responded with questions about where the two Senators stand on the issues that are important to you!
This was our chance to help put an end to the partisan bickering and put the Senators on the record – and yet again, AARP activists like you rose to the challenge!
Whether or not your question was asked at the debate, we will be delivering all questions to the Senators with your contact information so that they can get back to you.
Let us know how they respond so we can help other AARP supporters know where the Senators stand on issues most important to you!
Sincerely,
Barry Jackson
AARP Online Advocacy Manager -
Barack Obama on the Importance of US-Armenia Relations AND TURKEY
Barack Obama on the Importance of US-Armenia Relations
“Two years ago, I criticized the Secretary of State for the firing of U.S. Ambassador to Armenia, John Evans, after he properly used the term “genocide” to describe Turkey’s slaughter of thousands of Armenians starting in 1915″ …. Barack Obama
| January 19, 2008
I am proud of my strong record on issues of concern to the one and a half million Americans of Armenian heritage in the United States. I warmly welcome the support of this vibrant and politically active community as we change how our government works here at home, and restore American leadership abroad.
I am a strong supporter of a U.S.-Armenian relationship that advances our common security and strengthens Armenian democracy. As President, I will maintain our assistance to Armenia, which has been a reliable partner in the fight against terrorism and extremism. I will promote Armenian security by seeking an end to the Turkish and Azerbaijani blockades, and by working for a lasting and durable settlement of the Nagorno Karabagh conflict that is agreeable to all parties, and based upon America’s founding commitment to the principles of democracy and self determination. And my Administration will help foster Armenia’s growth and development through expanded trade and targeted aid, and by strengthening the commercial, political, military, developmental, and cultural relationships between the U.S. and Armenian governments.
I also share with Armenian Americans – so many of whom are descended from genocide survivors – a principled commitment to commemorating and ending genocide. That starts with acknowledging the tragic instances of genocide in world history. As a U.S. Senator, I have stood with the Armenian American community in calling for Turkey’s acknowledgement of the Armenian Genocide. Two years ago, I criticized the Secretary of State for the firing of U.S. Ambassador to Armenia, John Evans, after he properly used the term “genocide” to describe Turkey’s slaughter of thousands of Armenians starting in 1915. I shared with Secretary Rice my firmly held conviction that the Armenian Genocide is not an allegation, a personal opinion, or a point of view, but rather a widely documented fact supported by an overwhelming body of historical evidence. The facts are undeniable. An official policy that calls on diplomats to distort the historical facts is an untenable policy. As a senator, I strongly support passage of the Armenian Genocide Resolution (H.Res.106 and S.Res.106), and as President I will recognize the Armenian Genocide.
Genocide, sadly, persists to this day, and threatens our common security and common humanity. Tragically, we are witnessing in Sudan many of the same brutal tactics – displacement, starvation, and mass slaughter – that were used by the Ottoman authorities against defenseless Armenians back in 1915. I have visited Darfurian refugee camps, pushed for the deployment of a robust multinational force for Darfur, and urged divestment from companies doing business in Sudan. America deserves a leader who speaks truthfully about the Armenian Genocide and responds forcefully to all genocides. I intend to be that President.
I look forward, as President, to continuing my active engagement with Armenian American leaders on the full range of issues of concern to the Armenian American community. Together, we will build, in new and exciting ways, upon the enduring ties and shared values that have bound together the American and Armenian peoples for more than a century
===========Obama’nın en büyük yalanı=================
Obama’nın en büyük yalanı – ABD sahillerinde ve Alaskadaki kaynaklardan petrol karşı çıkarken, ABDnin dışdan gelen petrolden asıllı yapmayaçağını söylemesi.Barack Obama is a classical liar. People get hooked onto the opportunity to reduce oil imports, withdraw from Iraq, reduce U.S. military presence worldwide. But no one really asks a question, how a man opposing the drilling off the U.S. coast or within the U.S. proper is planning to accomplish these. Obama’s argument – Renewable energy? Good ideal, but it won’t appear out of magic in January 2009, when the new President takes office. Obama is not a scientist and not a God to invent it within even 4 or 8 years.
But most importantly, will any of you, American voters, be willing to turn off their lights and not drive their cars, for President Obama to accomplish his utopic yet false promise – the answer is clearly no. Just the opposite, the one who opposes drilling in U.S. will have to increase the dependence on foreign oil = U.S. military presence worldwide.
And this is only one of his sheer lies apart from those vis-a-vis foreign policy. Obama talks about opposing special interest groups, while his words here about Turkey:
“As a President, I will maintain our assistance to Armenia; I will promote Armenian security by seeking an end to the Turkish and Azerbaijani blockades… America deserves a leader who speaks truthfully about the Armenian Genocide and responds forcefully to all genocides. I intend to be that President.”
are paid by ANCA and ArmeniansForObama campaign, which IS a special interest group. I don’t understand how any Turk can even think to vote Obama, while it’s John McCain who at every single campaign meeting cites Turkey as an ally, a democratic nation and an example for the Muslim world, and most importantly opposes U.S. interference into historical issues between Turkey and Armenia.So, if Turkish pride somehow affects your choices as American voter, voting Obama is the last thing to do. Unless you want to walk in this country ashamed in front of Armenians, or even worse, be charged (like in France) for denying that your ancestors were murderers, just for being Turks.
Javid Huseynov [javid@azeris.com]
-
Poll: Convention lifts McCain over Obama
By Susan Page, USA TODAYWASHINGTON — The Republican National Convention has given John McCain and his party a significant boost, a USA TODAY/Gallup Poll taken over the weekend shows, as running mate Sarah Palin helps close an “enthusiasm gap” that has dogged the GOP all year.McCain leads Democrat Barack Obama by 50%-46% among registered voters, the Republican’s biggest advantage since January and a turnaround from the USA TODAY poll taken just before the convention opened in St. Paul. Then, he lagged by 7 percentage points.
CONVENTION: GOP rejuvenatedThe convention bounce has helped not only McCain but also attitudes toward Republican congressional candidates and the GOP in general.
“The Republicans had a very successful convention and, at least initially, the selection of Sarah Palin has made a big difference,” says political scientist Larry Sabato of the University of Virginia. “He’s in a far better position than his people imagined he would be in at this point.”
FIND MORE STORIES IN: George W Bush | Barack Obama |John McCain | Republican National Convention | University of Virginia | Joe Biden | Sarah Palin | Larry SabatoHowever, in an analysis of the impact of political conventions since 1960, Sabato concluded that post-convention polls signal the election’s outcome only about half the time. “You could flip a coin and be about as predictive,” he says. “It is really surprising how quickly convention memories fade.”
McCain has narrowed Obama’s wide advantage on handling the economy, by far the electorate’s top issue. Before the GOP convention, Obama was favored by 19 points; now he’s favored by 3.
The Republican’s ties to President Bush remains a vulnerability. In the poll, 63% say they are concerned he would pursue policies too similar to those of the current president. Bush’s approval rating is 33%.
In the new poll, taken Friday through Sunday, McCain leads Obama by 54%-44% among those seen as most likely to vote. The survey of 1,022 adults, including 959 registered voters, has a margin of error of +/— 3 points for both samples.
Among the findings:
• Before the convention, Republicans by 47%-39% were less enthusiastic than usual about voting. Now, they are more enthusiastic by 60%-24%, a sweeping change that narrows a key Democratic advantage. Democrats report being more enthusiastic by 67%-19%.
• Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, a national unknown before McCain chose her for the ticket 10 days ago, draws a strong reaction from voters on both sides. Now, 29% say she makes them more likely to vote for McCain, 21% less likely.
Obama’s choice of Delaware Sen. Joe Biden as running mate made 14% more likely to vote for the Democrat, 7% less likely.
• McCain’s acceptance speech Thursday received lower ratings than the one Obama gave a week earlier: 15% called McCain’s speech “excellent” compared with 35% for Obama.