Tag: Barack Obama

  • OBAMA WILL USE THE TERM “GENOCIDE”

    OBAMA WILL USE THE TERM “GENOCIDE”

    A major think tank calls on President Obama not to recognize the killings of Armenians as ‘genocide’. ‘If Obama uses the word genocide, the Turkish response will be harsh and trigger a bitter breach in relations,’ the CSIS says.

    The Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), a major and bipartisan think tank in the United States capital, Monday called on President Barack Obama not to recognize World War I-era killings of Armenians in the Ottoman Empire as “genocide.”

    Zbigniew Brzezinski, national security adviser for former President Jimmy Carter, and Brent Scowcroft, national security adviser for former Presidents Gerald Ford and George H. W. Bush, jointly introduced the CSIS report at a meeting.

    Encourage and support rapprochement

    “If President Obama takes no action to prevent congressional enactment of the (Armenian) resolution (pending in the House of Representatives), endorses the measure, or uses the word genocide himself, the Turkish response will be harsh and trigger a bitter breach in relations,” the CSIS said.

    It said the United States, “rather than seek to legislate history,” should encourage and support rapprochement that Turkey and Armenia are trying to accomplish.

    At the end of a European tour, Obama will visit Turkey April 5-7.

    In a related development, four leading Democratic lawmakers sent a letter to President Abdullah Gul and Armenian President Serge Sarkisian, voicing their support for a Turkish-Armenian rapprochement.

    “It is critical that the United States and international community support Armenia and Turkey during their ongoing efforts to normalize relations and create positive dynamics in the Caucasus region,” Congressman Robert Wexler said on behalf of the four men.

    Four leading lawmakers

    “It is in the interest of the United States and both Armenia and Turkey that differences between Yerevan and Ankara are overcome and that a solid foundation is laid to enhance cooperation and diplomatic relations between these two nations,” he said.

    The letter was signed by Wexler, chairman of the Subcommittee on Europe in the House Committee on Foreign Affairs; Ike Skelton, Chairman of the House Armed Services Committee; John Murtha, Chairman of the Subcommittee on Defense in the House Committee on Appropriations; and Alcee L. Hastings, Co-Chairman of the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe (the U.S. Helsinki Commission).

    Comments on domestic front

    On domestic policy, the CSIS said the end of the ruling Justice and Development Party, or AKP’s, domination was not imminent, although opposition parties would benefit from the AKP’s gradual loss of support. The AKP won Sunday’s nationwide local elections, but its popular support dropped compared to previous polls.

    “The AKP is likely to refrain from (earlier plans) of a major revision of the Constitution,” the CSIS said.

    Asked to comment on “the pressure on the media by the government” and a near-$500 million penalty imposed on Doğan Holding media group, Bulent Aliriza, director of Turkey Project at CSIS and writer of the domestic politics section in the report, said he was concerned over the “unfortunate” developments.

    “I hope the government would ease its position on the media,” he said.

    —-

    LOGOGLU: OBAMA WILL USE THE TERM “GENOCIDE”

    Turkey’s retired ambassador to Washington, Faruk Logoglu claimed that U.S. President Barack Obama will use the term “Armenian genocide” during his speech on 24 April, after his Turkey visit.

    Logoglu said that he considers that U.S. President will use the term “genocide” for 1915 events. He said, “A resolution is introduced to Congress. Turkey and its friends should prevent these happening with using lobby organizations in United States.”

    Speaking at the same place, Adana Consul of United States, Eric Green said, “The decision of Obama on visiting Turkey shows the importance of Turkey for Obama administration. I agree with the opinion that Turkey will be the energy corridor that transfers energy from Iran, Iraq and from east. We heard about anti-US opinion in Turkey. During the time since i have been in Adana, people of the city were so friendly and hospitable against us.”———————–

    TURKISH FORUMS POINT OF  VIEW

    https://www.turkishnews.com/en/content/2009/02/23/1915-truths-have-reached-president-obama-and-decision/>/

    https://www.turkishnews.com/tr/content/2009/02/23/1915-olaylari-baskan-obamaya-hakiketler-ulasdi-ve-karar/

    TURKISH FORUMDAN DOSTLARINA VE UYELERINE ACiLCAGRI

    2009 MEMBERSHIP DUES AND YOUR DONATIONS ARE NEEDED TO CONTINUE OUR POSTED PROGRAMS WITH OUT INTERUPTION

    THE FOLLOWING LINKS WILL TAKE YOU TO THE DUES AND DONATIONS PAGE
    https://www.turkishnews.com/tr/content/2009/02/14/2009-yili-uye-aidatlari-ve-bagislariniz/
    Turkish ForumBiz Kimiz?Bize UlaşınProjelerimizYardımlarınız

    Hakkımızda (About Us) | Kayıt Ol (Subscribe) | Bize Yazın (Contact Us) | Bağışlarınız (Donations) | Güncelle (Update)

  • President Points To Progress on Economic Efforts

    President Points To Progress on Economic Efforts

    obama2He Says Budget Is Key to Recovery

    slideshow topVideoPH2009032402942Full News Conference: ObamaPresident Obama held a prime-time news conference Tuesday addressing the economic recession, his administration’s recovery strategy, and other current events during the first 60 days of his presidency. » LAUNCH VIDEO PLAYERslideshow bot

    By Michael D. Shear and Scott Wilson Washington Post Staff Writers
    Wednesday, March 25, 2009; Page A01

    President Obama sought to reassure Americans last night that his administration has made progress in reviving the economy and said his $3.6 trillion budget is “inseparable from this recovery.”

    After sprinting through his first months in office, Obama is now facing heightened criticism from Republicans, who have called his blueprint irresponsible, and from skeptical Democrats who have already set about trimming back his top budget priorities.

    Obama came into office amid lofty expectations and the worst economic crisis in generations, and he succeeded in pushing through a $787 billion stimulus and launching expensive plans to revive the banking system.

    Last night, against a backdrop of a broad national anxiety that the economy may still be failing, he attempted to recalibrate the high hopes to more closely fit the challenges he said lie ahead.

    Although he spoke sharply once in response to Republican criticism, Obama struck a tone of common purpose throughout his second prime-time news conference, urging the country to be patient as he works on issues as divergent as the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the malign impact of lobbying in Washington.

    “We haven’t immediately eliminated the influence of lobbyists in Washington,” he said from the East Room of the White House. “We have not immediately eliminated wasteful pork projects. And we’re not immediately going to get Middle East peace. We’ve been in office now a little over 60 days.

    “What I am confident about is that we’re moving in the right direction.”

    Throughout the evening, Obama returned repeatedly to his belief that patience and determination will win out, declaring that the “whole philosophy of persistence, by the way, is one that I’m going to be emphasizing again and again in the months and years to come as long as I’m in this office. I’m a big believer in persistence.”

    Asked about congressional efforts to chip away at his main facets of his agenda, Obama gave no indication that he would need to abandon core principles.

    “We never expected, when we printed out our budget, that they would simply Xerox it and vote on it. We assume that it has to go through the legislative process. . . . I have confidence that we’re going to be able to get a budget done that’s reflective of what needs to happen in order to make sure that America grows.”

    During the 55-minute news conference, Obama faced no questions about the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, Osama bin Laden, or terrorism. Instead, the president focused consistently on his administration’s efforts to boost the economy, presenting his first budget proposal as the critical and most far-reaching step in that process.

    In a statement earlier in the day, House Minority Leader John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) said Obama’s budget “may be the most irresponsible piece of legislation I’ve seen in my legislative career. It’s an irresponsible plan that only makes the crisis we’re in worse. But when it’s all said and done, I think it’s time for a do-over.”

    Responding with his most partisan comment of the evening, Obama said his Republican critics should look to their own history with the federal budget, accusing them of having “a short memory” when it comes to deficits.

    “As I recall, I’m inheriting a $1.3 trillion annual deficit from them,” he said.

    Obama’s appearance came on the same day that lawmakers grilled Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke for hours about their knowledge of the AIG bonus payments and lectured the officials for not preventing them.

    And shortly before the president took to the lectern, Democrats in Congress were preparing to make sharp cuts to the budget plan he was seeking to rally Americans to support.

    Repeating that he, too, was angry about the bonuses, Obama tried to tamp down the populist anger that has consumed much of Washington in the past 10 days.

    “The rest of us can’t afford to demonize every investor or entrepreneur who seeks to make a profit,” he said. “. . . When each of us looks beyond our own short-term interests to the wider set of obligations we have to each other — that’s when we succeed.”

    Obama’s comments last night — delivered in a calm and measured tone — were a departure from his emotional declarations of outrage last week that helped speed anti-AIG legislation through the House. He called on the public to “look toward the future with a renewed sense of common purpose, a renewed determination.”

    Asked why he waited several days to publicly express his frustrations after finding out about the AIG bonuses, he coolly said: “It took us a couple of days because I like to know what I’m talking about before I speak.”

    The White House announced yesterday that the president will meet with the leaders of some of the nation’s largest banks Friday. A White House official said Obama will “reiterate his belief that getting the economy back on track will require an understanding that each of us must look beyond our own short-term interests.”

    During the news conference, Obama defended his efforts, announced by Geithner earlier in the day, to seek broad new authority to oversee companies like AIG in the same way that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. can take control of struggling banks.

    “It is precisely because of the lack of this authority that the AIG situation has gotten worse,” he said.

    The question-and-answer session also served to continue Obama’s direct-to-the-public lobbying effort on behalf of his budget. He will take his case to Capitol Hill today when he meets with Democratic senators.

    The news conference was the culmination of more than a week of aggressive public outreach for his policies. Last week, Obama traveled to California for two town hall meetings aimed at persuading Americans to support his plans. He also appeared on “The Tonight Show With Jay Leno.”

    “We’ve put in place a comprehensive strategy designed to attack this crisis on all fronts,” Obama said last night. “It’s a strategy to create jobs, to help responsible homeowners, to restart lending and to grow our economy over the long term. And we are beginning to see signs of progress.”

    Obama said that “almost every single person” who has examined the nation’s long-term budget problem has concluded that the government must find a way to reduce health-care costs. He argued that his proposal will cut the deficit in half by the end of his first term.

    “This is hard,” he said later. “The reason it’s hard is because we’ve accumulated a structural deficit that’s going to take a long time. . . . The alternative is to stand pat.”

    Most of the questions focused on the economy. But Obama also waded briefly into foreign policy just days before his first trip to Europe as president.

    Referring to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, he said: “The status quo is unsustainable.” Binyamin Netanyahu, the incoming Israeli prime minister, has been deeply skeptical of the idea of creating a Palestinian state, but Obama indicated that the administration will press him to rethink that position. “We are going to be serious from Day One in trying to move the parties,” he said.

    On a day that his secretary of homeland security announced tougher measures aimed at enhancing security along the border with Mexico, Obama pledged to monitor the increasing drug violence in that country that threatens to spill into the southwestern United States.

    “If the steps that we have taken do not get the job done, then we will do more,” he pledged. In addition to securing the border against incoming threats, he also promised to work hard to “make sure that illegal guns and cash aren’t flowing back to these cartels.”

    Asked whether race had played a role in public policy discussions during his first months in office, he said the novelty and “justifiable pride” among Americans from his being the first black president had lasted only a day.

    “Right now, the American people are judging me exactly the way I should be judged,” he said, offering as examples his efforts to improve lending, increase jobs and get the economy working again.

    Asked about stem cell research, Obama acknowledged the need for moral and ethical standards to guide scientific issues and said he is satisfied that his new rules allowing greater research are consistent with such standards.

    But he said he would be willing to shift his views if scientists determine that adult stem cells can be as useful as those created from embryos.

    “I have no investment in causing controversy,” he said. “I am happy to avoid it if that’s where the science leads us.”

    Presidents George W. Bush and Bill Clinton each had four prime-time news conferences from the East Room during their eight years in office, according to Martha Joynt Kumar, a professor of political science at Towson University. Obama has already held two in little more than two months in office.

    Obama has been criticized for relying heavily on a teleprompter, even for short speeches and brief appearances. Last night, the teleprompter was moved to the back of the room, out of sight of the cameras.

    Staff writers Michael A. Fletcher, Karen DeYoung and Glenn Kessler contributed to this report.

  • ARMENIAN PAYROLL RECIPIENT AKCAM SPEAKS AGAIN

    ARMENIAN PAYROLL RECIPIENT AKCAM SPEAKS AGAIN

    Akcam: Obama Should Recognize Genocide and Liberate Turks and Armenians

    By KhatchigMouradian • on March 24, 2009 • 

    Prof. Taner Akcam

    WORCESTER, Mass. (A.W.)-On March 19, prominent Turkish-born genocide scholar Taner Akcam delive red his inaugural lecture at Clark University titled, “Facing History: Denial and the Turkish National Security Concept.” In 2008, Akcam was appointed the Robert Aram and Marianne Kaloosdian and Stephen and Marion Mugar Chair in Armenian Genocide Studies at Clark University.

    Speaking to an audience that had packed the Tilton Hall of the Higgins University Center, Akcam sent a powerful message to U.S. President Barack Obama, asking him to liberate Turks and Armenians by properly recognizing the Armenian Genocide.

    Talking about the reluctance of Congress and some former U.S. presidents to acknowledge the Armenian Genocide, Akcam said, “[T]here’s an ongoing theatrical drama-perhaps ‘comedy’ would be a better term-that all the parties engage in every year, and that has started to grow old. It’s time to end this dishonorable play-acting.” He explained how every time a U.S. president or Congress has the issue of the genocide on their table, “Rhey end up denying for one day what they believe the other 364 days of the year.”

    Akcam continued, “All of the parties involved know very well what the U.S. administration and Congress think about 1915. But Turkey asks them to tell a lie only for one day. I have never understood why the Turkish government extracts so much joy out of making the United States lie for one day. I also find it completely dishonorable. Not only does this lie fail to lead to a resolu tion, it needlessly locks up the debate.”

    Hence, Akcam argued, the importance of official U.S. recognition of the Armenian Genocide-“if the United States declares what it believes to be the truth and stands behind it”-would not only gain it “some self-respect on the subject, but it will liberate Turks, Armenians, and itself in the process.”

    Akcam ended his lecture by asking Obama to stand up for truth. “I believe that we will enter a new era where morality and real politik will not be considered mutually exclusive, if President Obama should put an end to this lingering problem and liberate everybody in the process by an official acknowledgment of genocide,” he said.

    Obama, both as a Senator and a presidential candidate, was an outspoken advocate for proper U.S. reaffirmation of the Armenian Genocide. He repeatedly called on former president George W. Bush to recognize the genocide and expressed reservations over the firing of U.S. Ambassador to Armenia John Marshall Evans for his remarks recognizing that crime. In January 2008, Obama issued a campaign statement, noting that “America deserves a leader who speaks truthfully about the Armenian Genocide and responds forcefully to all genocides. I intend to be that President.” The complete statement may be read at www.barackobama.com/2008/01/19/barack_obama_on_the_importance.php.

    Last week, Representati ves Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), George Radanovich (R-Calif.), Frank Pallone (D-N.J.), and Mark Kirk (R-Ill.) were joined by 70 of their House Colleagues in the introduction of Armenian Genocide legislation (H.Res.252) calling on the president to recognize the Armenian Genocide. That resolution is identical to the one introduced in the previous Congress, which was adopted by the House Foreign Affairs Committee by a vote of 27 to 21, and had over 200 co-sponsors.

    Related Entries

    • Genocide Scholars Urge Obama to Recognize Armenian Genocide
    • Babacan Warns Obama Against Recognizing Genocide
    • In Exclusive Interviews with the Weekly: Congressmen Stand Firmly Behind Genocide Resolution
    • Akcam to Deliver Lecture on Genocide, National Security
    • ANCA Comments on LA Times Coverage of Obama Genocide Pledge

    Recent Entries

    • Akcam: Obama Should Recognize Genocide and Liberate Turks and Armenians
    • Syrian Armenians’ Last Chance to File Claims for Properties in Turkey
    • Hai Guin Annual Spring Luncheon will Feature Meryl Galaid
    • Three Tenors Strike A Different Tune
    • Armenian Parliamentary Leader Urges U.S. Counterpart to Pass Genocide Bill

    00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

  • Obama wavers on pledge to declare Armenian genocide

    Obama wavers on pledge to declare Armenian genocide


    17.03.2009 18:41 GMT+04:00
    /PanARMENIAN.Net/ The Obama administration is hesitating on a promised presidential declaration that Armenians were the victims of genocide in the early 20th century, fearful of alienating Turkey when U.S. officials badly want its help.

    President Obama and other top administration officials pledged during the presidential campaign to officially designate the 1915 killings of Armenians by the Ottoman Turks as genocide. Many Armenian Americans, who are descendants of the victims and survivors, have long sought such a declaration.

    But the administration also has been soliciting Ankara’s help on Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran and other security issues amid Turkish warnings that an official U.S. statement would imperil Turkey’s assistance.

    Administration officials are considering postponing a presidential statement, citing progress toward a thaw in relations between Turkey and neighboring Armenia. Further signs of warming — such as talk of reopening border crossings — would strengthen arguments that a U.S. statement could imperil the progress.

    “At this moment, our focus is on how, moving forward, the United States can help Armenia and Turkey work together to come to terms with the past,” said Michael Hammer, a spokesman for the National Security Council. He said the administration was “encouraged” by improvements in relations and believed it was “important that the countries have an open and honest dialogue about the past.”

    Armenian Americans and their supporters, however, say policies that avoid offending Turkey merely advance Ankara’s denial of brutal periods in its history.

    An estimated 1.5 million Armenians were victims of planned killings by the Ottoman Turks as the empire was dissolving during World War I, an episode historians have concluded was a genocide. But Turkey and some of its supporters contend that the deaths resulted from civil war and unrest and that their numbers were exaggerated.

    American presidents have long sought to avoid calling the killings a genocide, fearing repercussions from a NATO ally that is acutely sensitive to the charge. In 2007, the Bush administration argued for a delay in a congressional genocide resolution, saying that Turkish assistance was needed for the safety of U.S. troops in Iraq.

    For Obama, the controversy comes at an especially sensitive time. He is visiting Turkey on April 5, and his views on the issue will command worldwide attention. Armenian Americans, meanwhile, have been pushing for a White House declaration on April 24, the annual remembrance day. Congressional supporters are also planning to reintroduce the genocide resolution soon.

    Obama’s visit to Turkey has become risky for the administration, said Mark Parris, a former U.S. ambassador to Turkey. “Plopping the president down over there really does raise the stakes,” said Parris, now co-director of the Brookings Institution’s program on Turkey. “Now it can’t be overlooked. . . . It could carry costs to his credibility.”

    Obama declared repeatedly during his campaign that the killings were genocide. Vice President Joe Biden and Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton are on record with similar positions.

    But the Obama administration would like to use Turkey as part of the military supply line for Afghanistan. It also would like more help regarding Iraq, Iran’s nuclear program, Russia and Mideast peace.

    Relations between Turkey and Armenia began warming noticeably in September, when Turkish President Abdullah Gul became the first Turkish leader to visit Armenia. The countries are considering opening borders and embassies, initiating economic cooperation and establishing a historical commission.

    But Parris said further openings to Armenia would carry domestic risks for Turkish leaders, who could be reluctant to do so if they thought Obama would declare a genocide on April 24.

    Congressional supporters of the genocide resolution expressed frustration about the latest resistance.

    “The argument that some are making now is only the latest incarnation of the same old tired refrain: that we should recognize the genocide — just not this year,” said Rep. Adam B. Schiff (D-Burbank), one of the sponsors of the resolution.

    Another advocate, Rep. Brad Sherman (D-Sherman Oaks), said that though the strength of Turkey’s cautions was declining, Turks remained influential with lawmakers who believed a halt in Ankara’s aid could hurt U.S. troops. Sherman called it “their ugly ace in the hole.”

    Aram Hamparian, executive director of the Armenian National Committee of America, remained optimistic. Obama “is a man of his word and has been crystal clear on the issue,” The Los Angeles Times cited him as saying.

    But Turks remain uneasy. Ali Babacan, the Turkish foreign minister, warned in a TV interview last week that Obama’s visit didn’t preclude a genocide declaration.

    “The Turks fully understand that the danger of the [genocide] resolution is not going away,” said Bulent Aliriza, director of the Turkey Project at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

  • Obama to visit Turkey in key policy move

    Obama to visit Turkey in key policy move

    By Bridget Johnson
    Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton vowed that President Obama will visit Turkey soon in a trip that could be about more than bridging the gap between East and West.

    In its physical position as the gateway from Europeinto the Middle East, Turkey has been a crucial U.S. and NATO ally, as well as a route to supply troops in Iraq and Afghanistan. In its ideological position, Turkey is seen as a key example of a secular, democratic Islamic state.

    “The last time I was here, my husband was president,” Clinton told reporters. “This time, I come as secretary of state, on behalf of our new president, President Obama, to emphasize the work the U.S. and Turkey must do together on behalf of peace, prosperity and progress.” Clinton, who held meetings with Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Foreign Minister Ali Babacan in Ankara on Saturday, also visited the masoleum of Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, founder of the Turkish Republic.

    Babacan said Saturday that Turkey was “ready to cooperate” in being a exit route when the U.S. withdraws from Iraq. A joint statement issued after the meetings said that the leaders “reaffirmed their determination to diversify the broad based bilateral relations particularly between the Turkish and American people,” and said the U.S. “is reviewing ways to be more supportive” in Turkey’s fight against Kurdish PKK rebels along the Iraqi border.

    The work that the U.S. and Turkey undertake together, though, may involve a third party. Erdogan told the Guardian last month that, during President George W. Bush’s term, Iran approached him to act as a go-between in resolving its conflict with the United States.

    “Iran does want Turkey to play such a role,” Erdogan said of Turkey being a mediator. “And if the United States also wants and asks us to play this role, we are ready to do this. [The Iranians] said to us that if something like this would happen, they want Turkey to play a role. These were words that were said openly. But I have told this to President Bush myself.”

    Erdogan indicated that he passed along Iran’s request to the White House at the time, but may bring up the offer anew with the new administration.

    Obama has stressed that dialogue with Iran and Syria would be a key area in which his foreign policy would differ from the Bush administration’s. Jeffrey Feltman, the acting U.S. secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs, and Daniel Shapiro of the National Security Council met with Syrian officials including Foreign Minister Walid Muallem in Damascus on Saturday.

    Afterward, Feltman called the talks “very constructive.”

    Not pinning down a date for Obama’s visit, Clinton said he should be traveling to Turkey “in about a month or so.” Before that, Obama is scheduled to travel to Europe to attend the G-20 economic summit in London, plus visit France and Germany for NATO summit events. He will also visit the Czech Republic to meet with European Union leaders.

  • Obama takes sharp turn on foreign policy

    Obama takes sharp turn on foreign policy

    Lost in the cacophony of the economic crisis is the issue on which the candidate Barack Obama promised to effect some of the most change: foreign policy.

    And yet, as Obama’s presidential term has buzzed with bailouts, stimulus, the budget and now healthcare reform, his administration has been steadily pressing forward with its plans to “reboot” relationships and distance itself from goals and tactics of the Bush years.
    “Look at general things that have been done,” Robert Hunter, NATO ambassador under President Clinton and now a senior adviser at RAND Corp., told The Hill. “A lot of things have been cleaned up from the past in terms of America’s reputation,” including the decision to close the Guantanamo Bay detention facility for terror suspects and choosing to send the vice president to last month’s Munich Security Conference, he said.

    Former U.N. Ambassador John Bolton sees these initial actions differently.

    “It represents a triumph of process over substance,” Bolton, now a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, told The Hill. Bolton questioned whether the administration’s game plan of “simply talking to governments [to] change disagreements about fundamental issues” will prove useful.

    Many of Obama’s initial foreign policy endeavors ring familiar to those who remember his stumps on the campaign trail. His pledge to turn the military’s focus back to Afghanistan was jump-started with last month’s announcement that the U.S. will send 17,000 more troops to the Central Asian country, although he still faces challenges in getting cooperation from other NATO coalition partners to dial up the 40-nation effort there. “A sensible question is whether Europe will step up to the plate,” Bolton said.

    Obama’s pledge to engage Iran and Syria diplomatically without preconditions culminated in the four-hour Saturday meeting between Jeffrey Feltman, the acting U.S. secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs, Daniel Shapiro of the National Security Council, and Syrian officials including Foreign Minister Walid Muallem in Damascus.

    Feltman emerged to label the talks “very constructive.”

    Moves such as this, said Hunter, “get rid of the underbrush we’ve had for so many years — ‘if you want to talk to us, you have to be a friend.’”

    And Iran is being invited to a regional conference at the end of this month to discuss Afghanistan. But talks with Iran — which, Israel’s military intelligence chief claimed Sunday, can now build a nuclear weapon — may get a boost from Obama’s upcoming trip to Turkey, a country that had previously been asked by Iran to serve as a mediator between the Islamic Republic and the United States.

    “I don’t think the Iranian government is ever going to be talked out of nuclear weapons,” Bolton said. But the former ambassador said Iran “would love to talk to the United States,” feeling that the extended diplomacy would buy them time and lend them legitimacy.

    Ironically, Obama’s out-of-the-gate foreign policy is being powered by Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, the same Democratic presidential hopeful who lambasted Obama’s platform of talks with Iran and Syria as illustrating foreign-policy amateurishness.

    Even though Clinton and Obama have found common cause, though, the agenda is still not without controversy.

    News broke last week that Obama had sent a letter to Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, allegedly offering to drop plans for the Eastern Europe missile defense system if Russia would help bring Iran in line. Obama said the New York Times story mischaracterized this cog in his wider goal to “reboot” the Russian-American relationship.

    “What I said in the letter was that, obviously, to the extent that we are lessening Iran’s commitment to nuclear weapons, then that reduces the pressure for — or the need for a missile defense system,” Obama said at the White House last Tuesday. “In no way does that in any — does that diminish my commitment to making sure that Poland, the Czech Republic, and other NATO members are fully enjoying the partnership, the alliance, and U.S. support with respect to their security.”

    Hunter said Obama would want to make sure that the missile defense system is cost-effective and capable of stopping an attack before pressing forward on the plan. “Pressing the reset button doesn’t mean Russia is going to do everything we want,” and vice-versa, he said.

    “The letter shows [the Obama administration is] prepared to trade [the missile defense system] away,” Bolton said, adding Russia would see it as a sign of weakness.

    Another point of controversy last week was Thursday’s meeting of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, where Zbigniew Brzezinski and Brent Scowcroft — former national security advisers for Presidents Carter and George H.W. Bush, respectively — were the sole witnesses for the “U.S. Strategy Regarding Iran” hearing. “When Brzezinski used his short opening statement to say Secretary of State Hillary Clinton should be cautious about listening to Israel’s ideas, the red flag really went up,” one Jewish leader told the Jerusalem Post afterward.