Tag: Barack Obama

  • Armeno-Turkish Relations:  Pitfalls and Possibilities

    Armeno-Turkish Relations: Pitfalls and Possibilities

    The Armenian Revolutionary Federation

    NY and NJ Committees

    Present

    Armeno-Turkish Relations:

    Pitfalls and Possibilities

    A public forum

    Featuring

    John Evans

    Former US Ambassador to Armenia

    Ken Hachikian

    Chairman, ANCA

    Richard Hovannisian

    AEF Chair in Modern Armenian History, UCLA

    Dennis Papazian

    Emeritus Professor of History, University of Michigan-Dearborn

    Sunday, March 7

    4:30 pm

    New York Hilton Hotel

    1335 Ave. of the Americas (at 53rd St)

    Admission is Free

    For more information, contact the ARF at (718) 651-1530 or (201) 945-0011

    __._,_.___

  • What’s Really Behind Turkey’s Coup Arrests?

    What’s Really Behind Turkey’s Coup Arrests?

    What’s Really Behind Turkey’s Coup Arrests? | Foreign Policy

    BY SONER CAGAPTAY | FEBRUARY 25, 2010

    FEBRUARY 27, 2010

    What’s Really Behind Turkey’s Coup Arrests?

    All signs point to Fethullah Gülen, whose shadowy Islamist movement is rapidly extending its tentacles into all aspects of Turkish political life.

    BY SONER CAGAPTAY | FEBRUARY 25, 2010

    For the last several decades, the Turkish military was untouchable; no one dared to criticize the military or its top generals, lest they risk getting burned.  The Turkish Armed Forces were the ultimate protectors of founding father Kemal Ataturk’s secular legacy, and no other force in the country could seriously threaten its supremacy. Not anymore.

    On Feb. 22, 49 officers—including active-duty generals, admirals, and former commanders of the Turkish navy and air force—were arrested on allegations of plotting a coup against the government. Specifically, the officers were charged with authoring a 5,000-page memo that was later published in Taraf, a paper whose editorial policy is singularly dedicated to bashing the military. Among other things, the memo stated that the Turkish military was planning to bomb Istanbul’s historic mosques and shoot down its own planes to justify a coup.  When I asked a former U.S. ambassador to Turkey for his views on the news, he thought the scenario was ridiculous. “If the Turkish military was going to do a coup, they would not be writing a 5,000-page memo about it,” he stated.  Three days later, the former commanders of the navy and air force were released — further proof that the government’s intention was to intimidate Turkey’s military, rather than proceed with an indictment against these high-ranking officials. The arrests followed a Feb. 19 incident in which an audio recording of Turkey’s chief of staff was leaked to Vakit, a small jihadi Islamist newspaper that has celebrated the killing of U.S. soldiers in Afghanistan. In Turkey, it is illegal to wiretap individuals without a court order, and it is also illegal to publish such wiretaps. However, no one has been prosecuted for this wiretap against the chief of staff—a sign that the balance of power in Turkey has shifted decisively.

    A mountain has moved in Turkish politics. All shots against the military are now fair game, including those below the belt. The force behind this dramatic change is the Fethullah Gülen Movement (FGH), an ultraconservative political faction that backs the ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP). The FGH was founded in the 1970s by Fethullah Gülen, a charismatic preacher who now lives in the United States but remains popular in Turkey. It is a conservative movement aiming to reshape secular Turkey in its own image, by securing the supremacy of Gülen’s version of religion over politics, government, education, media, business, and public and personal life.

    To some, it might appear that the newfound freedom to criticize the military proves that Turkey is becoming a more liberal democracy. But the truth is that Turkey has replaced one “untouchable” organization for another, more dangerous, one. Criticizing the Gülen movement, which controls the national police and its powerful domestic intelligence branch, and which exerts increasing influence in the judiciary, has become as taboo as assailing the military once was. Today, it is those who criticize the Gülen movement who get burned. COMMENTS (87) SHARE: Digg  Facebook  Reddit   More…

    Of course, coup allegations are serious matters that warrant immediate action.  However, these allegations are part of the Ergenekon case—a convoluted investigation that so far has produced nothing in the last three years but a record-setting 5,800-page indictment, hundreds of early-morning house raids, and the detention of many prominent Turks, including university presidents and prominent educators such as Kemal Guruz and Mehmet Haberal. The only quality that ties together all of those arrested is their opposition to the AKP government and the Gülen movement. Zekeriya Oz, the chief prosecutor leading the Ergenekon case, and Ramazan Akyurek, the head of the police’s domestic intelligence branch, as well as other powerful people in the police, are thought by some to be Gülen sympathizers.

    Although some of the people interrogated and arrested might have been involved in criminal wrongdoing, most appear to be innocent. Take, for instance, Turkan Saylan, a 73-year-old grandmother who was undergoing chemotherapy. Saylan ran an NGO providing liberal arts education scholarships to poor girls in eastern Turkey, an area where Gülen’s network runs many competing organizations. She was interrogated by the Turkish police for allegedly plotting a coup from her death bed, and passed away only four weeks later.

    Many others have languished in jail, or even died, without seeing an indictment.  The Gülen-controlled parts of the judiciary and police have also wielded illegal wiretaps against those entangled in the Ergenekon case, leaking intimate details of their private lives, such as marital infidelity, to pro-AKP and pro-Gülen media in order to damage their reputations.

    Illegal wiretaps and arbitrary arrests serve to intimidate the public, not prosecute criminals. Because of Ergenekon, Turks who oppose the AKP and the Gülen movement fear to speak their minds freely. If you have doubts, call a friend in Turkey and ask for an opinion of the case. Your friend will respond with details of the weather.

    The military, which opposes the AKP and the Gülenists because it sees itself as the virtual guardian of Turkey’s secular polity à la Ataturk’s vision, serving as a bulwark against religion’s domination over politics and government, has become the primary target of this round of politically motivated arrests.  Illegally obtained documents, including confidential and sometimes embarrassing medical records of four-star generals, were published openly in Gülenist media.  Although the chief of staff said the documents were doctored, they were recently used as evidence, with the support of anonymous witnesses, to arrest serving generals and admirals.

    The roots of the Gülen movement’s vendetta against the army run deep. Following the pattern of the evangelical movement in the United States, the FGH grew dramatically in the 1980s. Gülen espoused a Machiavellian approach to democracy, saying to his followers in a message broadcast on Turkish TV in 1999 that “every method and path is acceptable [including] lying to people.” In the 1990s, the movement gained political power by throwing its weight behind various governments, which in return appointed FGH members to prominent positions in the bureaucracy, including the police and the intelligence branch.  In the late 1990s, Gülen went head-to-head with Turkey’s military—and lost.  The clash between the Islamist Welfare Party (RP) government, which was supported by the FHG, and the military was at the center of this conflict. In 1997, the Turkish military orchestrated a public campaign against the RP. With pressure mounting against its rule, the RP government stepped down. As a result, members of Islamist movements, including those belonging to the FGH, were purged from their posts in the bureaucracy and the military.  When the Turkish courts charged Gülen with corruption and anti-secular political activities in 1999, he fled to a rural compound in Pennsylvania. Although he was later acquitted, Gülen has never returned to Turkey.  The FGH has returned, however, with a vengeance. When the AKP, which is largely a reincarnation of the banned RP, came to power in 2002, the FGH positioned its media, voter, and business lobby support behind the governing party. In return, the AKP appointed FGH members to prominent positions in the judiciary and the bureaucracy, including the police’s intelligence branch.  With the Gülen movement in control of large portions of the government apparatus and running a political witch hunt against its opponents through the Ergenekon case, Turkey is taking a dangerously authoritarian turn. A personal friend and politician from the former Soviet Union once said, “A police state emerges not when the police listen to all the citizens, but when all the citizens fear that they are being listened to.” Welcome to the new Turkey: If you listen carefully, you can hear the political ground shifting below your feet.

  • Paying too little for gas? How about $8 a gallon?

    Paying too little for gas? How about $8 a gallon?

    A SURPRISE FROM OBAMA ON THE WAY – STOP THE SURPRISE

    0BAMA GULUYORBIGGEST TAX INCREASE IN THE US HISTORY IS AROUND THE CORNER

    “I have been leading the fight against the global warming hoax in the Senate for a decade. Myron Ebell and his team have always been there fighting beside me. Freedom Action is an invaluable ally.”
    –Senator James M. Inhofe (R-Oklahoma)
    Stop $8 Gas—Click Here
    Dear Fellow Patriot,
    Are you paying too little for gas at the pump?
    Are your electric bills way too low?
    President Barack Obama thinks so. The President said that under his global warming plan “electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket.” And he holds up Europe—where gas prices routinely approach $8 a gallon—as the model for U. S. energy policy.
    If you too are outraged by this, read on.
    President Obama, Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Senator Harry Reid, and White House Climate Czar Carol Browner all agree: You are paying far too little for the energy that fuels your cars and keeps the lights on.  And they have BIG plans to change that.
    Our politicians must hear from millions of Americans loud and clear that we aren’t going to let them get away with it.
    We can force them to back down—we’ve already done it by  stopping Cap-and-Trade (which is really Cap-and-TAX). House and Senate Members are rapidly running away from those bills. Why? Because the American people found out how much it was going to cost them, and said NO!
    But that isn’t stopping the zealots in Obama’s  Administration. They are now trying to use backdoor EPA regulations to raise energy costs through the roof. And what is most outrageous, they think they can mount this sneak attack on American consumers without getting Congress to approve it.
    Why are they doing this? They say it’s to stop global warming. What global warming! The top scientist in the Climategate scandal even recently admitted that global temperatures stopped going up in 1995. That’s right—there has been no global warming since 1995!
    Stop $8 Gas—Click Here
    What is really going on here is that Obama’s zealots are using the phony global warming crisis in order to push their big government agenda. Their goal? A HIDDEN TAX INCREASE. But not just any tax increase. The biggest tax increase in history.
    It’s that simple. They want trillions of dollars of our money to pay for more and more government spending. Not just for a few years—but for decades and decades.
    But with all of us working together, we can stop this sneak attack on our own wallets and America’s prosperity.
    Here’s how—
    We are sending this SOS to over one million Americans—and that’s just a start. Just one of us will be ignored. But when millions of Americans speak with one voice, Congress and even President Obama will be forced to listen.
    Click here to sign the Declaration that tells President Obama to back down and demands that Congress take action to stop Obama’s global warming regulations!
    By signing the Declaration, you will be adding your voice to a mighty grassroots movement. Freedom Action is a grassroots web-based group, dedicated to more freedom and less government. Our motto is what Margaret Thatcher said about President Reagan, “He put freedom on the offensive.” At Freedom Action, we’re doing just that.
    So let me invite you to sign the declaration to tell your elected leaders that you won’t stand for $8 gas and “skyrocketing” electric bills.
    Stop $8 Gas—Click Here
    Thanks for all you do to keep America strong!
    Yours for freedom,
    Myron Ebell
    Director, Freedom Action
    (By way of background, I’ve been engaged in grassroots activism and public policy since volunteering for the Reagan campaign in the 1980s. In 2009, Business Insider stated, “Myron Ebell may be enemy #1 to the current climate change community.” I’m trying hard to live up to that!)
    P. S. Once you’ve signed the Declaration, please forward this email to your friends. You can tell them that it only takes a couple minutes to take action on the biggest threat we face to our personal freedom and prosperity.

  • Turkey’s Gul seeks to calm military ‘coup plot’ fears

    Turkey’s Gul seeks to calm military ‘coup plot’ fears

    Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan (left), President Abdullah Gul and Gen Ilker Basbug meet in Ankara, February 25 2010

    Thursday’s meeting was called amid escalating tension between the government and the military

    Turkey’s president has said tensions over an alleged military coup plot will be resolved within the law, after meeting the head of the armed forces.

    President Abdullah Gul made the statement after a summit with Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan and armed forces chief Gen Ilker Basbug.

    Tension between the government and the military has risen following a round of arrests over the alleged plot.

    Twenty military officers were charged this week in connection with the case.

    They were among more than 40 officers arrested on Monday.

    HOW ‘COUP PLOTS’ EMERGED
    June 2007: Cache of explosives discovered; ex-soldiers detained
    July 2008: 20 arrested, including two ex-generals and a senior journalist, for “planning political disturbances and trying to organise a coup”
    July 2008: Governing AK Party narrowly escapes court ban
    October 2008: 86 go on trial charged with “Ergenekon” coup plot
    July 2009: 56 in dock as second trial opens
    Jan 2010: Taraf newspaper reports 2003 “sledgehammer” plot to provoke coup
    Feb 2010: More than 40 officers arrested over “sledgehammer”; 20 charged

    Turkey’s religious-secular divide

    Turkish military faces crossroads

    The retired head of the air force Ibrahim Firtina and former navy chief Ozden Ornek were in court on Thursday morning for questioning and could still be charged.

    After several hours of talks on Thursday, Mr Gul sought to reassure the country.

    “It was stressed that citizens can be sure that the problems on the agenda will be solved within the framework of the constitution and our laws,” a statement from his office said.

    Mr Erdogan was quoted by local media as saying Thursday’s meeting had gone “very well”.

    The military has denied any coup plot and has held its own officers’ summit to discuss the “serious situation” in the wake of the latest arrests.

    Unprecedented operation

    The BBC’s Jonathan Head in Istanbul says the Turkish government is embroiled in the greatest test yet of its authority over the armed forces.

    Turkey’s military has overthrown or forced the resignation of four governments since 1960 – most recently in 1997 – though Gen Basbug has insisted that coups are a thing of the past.

    The scale of Monday’s operation against the military was unprecedented. Those arrested include two serving admirals, three retired admirals and three retired generals.

    Former Air Force Commander Gen Ibrahim Firtina arriving at court in Istanbul, 25 Feburary 2010

    Ex-Air Force head Gen Ibrahim Firtina was among those being questioned

    A number of them are being kept in jail while 12 have reportedly been freed.

    Dozens of current or former members of the military have been arrested in the past few years over similar plot allegations, and some have been charged.

    The latest men to be charged were arrested over the so-called “sledgehammer” plot, which reportedly dates back to 2003.

    Reports of the alleged plot first surfaced in the liberal Taraf newspaper, which said it had discovered documents detailing plans to bomb two Istanbul mosques and provoke Greece into shooting down a Turkish plane over the Aegean Sea.

    The army has said the scenarios were discussed but only as part of a planning exercise at a military seminar.

    The alleged plot is similar, and possibly linked, to the reported Ergenekon conspiracy, in which military figures and staunch secularists allegedly planned to foment unrest, leading to a coup.

    Scores of people, including military officers, journalists and academics, are on trial in connection with that case.

    ‘Painful transformation’

    Analysts say the crackdown on the military would have been unthinkable only a few years ago.

    The army has regarded itself as the guardian of a secular Turkish state, but its power has been eroded in recent years, with Turkey enacting reforms designed to prepare it for entry to the European Union.

    Many Turks regard the cases as the latest stage in an ongoing power struggle between Turkey’s secular nationalist establishment and the governing AK Party.

    Critics believe the Ergenekon and sledgehammer investigations are simply attempts to silence the government’s political and military opponents.

    The AK Party has its roots in political Islam, and is accused by some nationalists of having secret plans to turn staunchly secular Turkey into an Islamic state.

    The government rejects those claims, saying its intention is to modernise Turkey and move it closer to EU membership.

    “Transformations may sometimes be painful,” Economy Minister Ali Babacan said Wednesday.

    “We are trying to make Turkey’s democracy first class.”


    What is your reaction to the crackdown on the military? post your views on the current crisis using the form below.

  • Proposal to Create a Framework  Uniting Diaspora Armenians

    Proposal to Create a Framework Uniting Diaspora Armenians

    sassounian33

    By Harut Sassounian

    Publisher, The California Courier

    Armenians are great believers in national unity. Actually, they are obsessed with it.

    Yet, despite all the talk about unifying the Armenian people, writing fiery poems and singing patriotic songs about the benefits of unity, this most cherished dream remains elusive. Examples of failed attempts at unity are aplenty. Even in perilous times, Armenians have remained at odds and marched to the beat of different drummers.

    However, as growing numbers of Armenians have come to realize that unity is critical for their national survival, they have managed in recent years to register modest successes in coalition building. Both the worldwide Hayastan All Armenian Fund and the U.S.-based United Armenian Fund consist of coalitions of major community organizations that carry out humanitarian work in Armenia and Artsakh (Karabagh).

    Ironically, as the proponents of unity have proliferated, so have the schemes to unify Armenians, leading to potential new divisions on how to achieve unification! There are now several such initiatives in different parts of the world, ranging from bringing all Armenian organizations under a single umbrella, to groupings of Armenian professionals, compatriotic societies and Western Armenians. In a recent column, the mere reference to the need for a Diaspora-wide organizational structure generated an overwhelmingly positive response.

    While all of the foregoing unity schemes merit serious consideration, and their advocates may end up joining hands, I wish to present some preliminary ideas which are the result of several years of reflection and serious discussions with respected individuals and community leaders in different countries.

    My proposed scheme involves the establishment of a unity framework representing Armenians throughout the Diaspora, excluding those living in the Republics of Armenia and Artsakh who are already represented by their respective governments. The estimated seven million Diasporans would be entitled to elect one representative for every 20,000 Armenians living in a particular electoral district. Candidates meeting certain pre-established qualifications can nominate themselves to represent the 20,000 Armenians in their district. Voters have to be at least 18 years old, be of Armenian origin, and have a verifiable electronic or mailing address in their electoral district. Armenians meeting these criteria can participate in the election, regardless of their citizenship, country of origin, religious or political affiliation. The election would be organized on the basis of the democratic principle of “one man, one vote!”

    In countries with a large Armenian population, several candidates would be elected to represent each group of 20,000 residents. While in sparsely Armenian-populated regions of the world, where 20,000 Armenians may be spread across several countries, one elected individual would represent the Armenian residents of those countries. Initially, there may be a low turn-out of voters. However, as the new structure gains strength and legitimacy, it will attract a greater number of participants. Elections do not have to be carried out simultaneously throughout the Diaspora. They could be held initially in one region to test the feasibility of the electoral procedures. In this regard, I wish to welcome the recent decision by French-Armenian community leaders to hold nationwide elections in France next year to select their representatives.

    It is important to note that only those elected by the public-at-large can truly state that they represent the Armenians residing in their district, while other community leaders can only claim to represent the members of their own organization! Consequently, the collective body of 350 representatives from all the electoral districts throughout the Diaspora can officially claim to represent Armenians worldwide, outside of Armenia and Artsakh.

    This collective body will have an elected chairperson or Speaker, committees and subcommittees dealing with culture, language, religion, education, foreign affairs, rights of Armenian minorities, relations with Armenia and Artsakh, Genocide recognition, demands for redress from Turkey, and financial matters.

    This 350-member body shall meet periodically and make decisions on the basis of majority vote. On certain critical issues, the body could adopt decisions by a two-thirds majority. Its decisions would reflect the views of the entire Diaspora, not just a particular organization. The existing Armenian organizations will continue to function with no hindrance or competition from this new transnational entity. In fact, the community organizations could expand their reach and increase their clout by lobbying the elected representatives of this new collective body to adopt their respective agendas. Since today’s Diaspora leaders are prominent members of their communities, it would not be surprising to see many of them elected to this new entity by popular vote.

    A key advantage of the new structure is the likelihood of its recognition by the United Nations and other regional and international organizations as a non-governmental organization (NGO) with the right to represent and speak on behalf of Diaspora Armenians.

    The representatives of the new entity in a particular city or country can also interact with local authorities on behalf of all Armenians residing in that region. For example, the recent dispute among Armenian-Americans about which group should represent the community in a meeting with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton could have been easily avoided if the proposed transnational body were in existence. Furthermore, Armenian government officials as well as foreign leaders would know whom to call when they need to contact the elected representatives of the Diaspora.

    The representatives of this new structure could also endorse candidates in local or national elections in different countries. This role becomes crucial in key elections or when multiple Armenian candidates run for the same office and split the Armenian vote, resulting in the defeat of all Armenian candidates. Those endorsed by this body would likely enjoy the support of the majority of local voters.

    Before attempting to implement such an ambitious initiative, several important steps need to be undertaken:

    1) A team of researchers would need to study similar schemes created by Israel, Greece, Lebanon, Italy, and other countries to benefit from their experience. Such a study could be carried out by the USC Institute of Armenian Studies which would then formulate the best mechanisms to conduct elections worldwide, including estimating the number of voters in each country, qualifications of voters and candidates, and measures to prevent voter fraud. The Institute could also propose significant details about the structure and function of the collective body (meeting procedures, committees and subcommittees, recall procedures, term limits, electing chairs and vice chairs).

    2) Before any public announcement is made about the establishment of the unity framework, the organizing committee should contact the leaders of influential Diaspora organizations to acquaint them with the new initiative and welcome their suggestions and support.

    3) The organizing committee should also brief government officials in Armenia and Artsakh about the objectives of the planned organization, and secure their tacit support without their actual involvement. After the newly-elected body becomes functional, its authorized representatives would interact with officials of both Armenia and Artsakh on a regular basis. It is critical to maintain the independence of the Diaspora-wide body, in order to shield Armenian officials from pressure by foreign powers to influence the decision-making of the new entity.

    Once established, this transnational organization would create for the first time a representative body in the Diaspora with political and economic clout capable of promoting Armenian interests, preserving cultural values and defending Armenian rights worldwide.

  • Washington blames Ankara for trouble in Armenian issue

    Washington blames Ankara for trouble in Armenian issue

    meclis amerika

    MEHMET ALİ BİRAND

    Monday, February 22, 2010

    The signed historical protocols with Armenia are losing their attractiveness with each passing day. General evaluation by Washington shows that Ankara is to be blamed for the point we arrived at. The Obama administration is very negative about the future of this protocol and the “genocide” resolution.
    If we gather evaluations and statements made by those monitoring upper-level authorities in Washington closely in this regard, then a totally different scenario from what we assumed emerges.
    One of the very first steps taken by the Obama administration in order to get rid of this genocide dilemma was to bring Turkey and Armenia together for a long process of discussion. Those who characterized this as a “step taken deliberately” complain, “We spent a lot of effort and time.”
    The same circles that draw attention to the process that started with a visit by the president and continued with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton focusing on this issue say that Turkey is responsible for what happened later on.
    According to the Americans, Turkey was not able to effectively convince Azerbaijan in time. People believe that after the signing the protocols it surrendered to Baku’s brisk reaction too soon.
    The prime minister linking the condition of signing the protocols in Parliament to the Karabakh issue is perceived by them as a “fatal stroke.”
    And the decision of the Armenian Constitutional Court they perceive as an “intelligible reaction” that does not hinder the protocol in harmony with the country’s general atmosphere.

    ‘Genocide’ resolution may pass this time

    It is being called attention to how the Obama administration will react when this now in Washington prioritized issue of “genocide” resolution in respect to Turkey comes up in Congress.
    During Obama’s election campaign he attracted attention saying that he would acknowledge the Armenian genocide and if there was no further development he’d be forced to continue his attitude.
    The same authority says “the shortest and most effective way to change this situation is for Turkey to separate the Armenian protocols from a solution in Karabakh,” knowing how difficult this is. But he can’t restrain himself from saying, “There is no other way out.”
    You see there are again black clouds gathering in Washington, as typical each year. The same scenarios will be played. Mutual threats, unnecessary tension and relations harmed.
    Will Washington just observe this situation?
    The following is the answer we get:
    “Can you tell us what Turkey does to make Obama not lose his bonus by taking back his promise? Why should we put the president into a difficult situation only to please an Ankara that constantly beats Israel or is at adverse terms with us regarding Iran?”
    Recently opponents of the AKP in Washington are able to more effectively make their views public. In the beginning the Obama administration did not pay much attention and continued supporting Erdoğan. But this support has slowly eroded. They say, “We no longer can pretend not hear their voices. We have started to feel that something is fishy about Turkish foreign politics.”
    This is the latest situation in the Armenian “genocide” resolution, to the attention of all those who are related to the subject.
    © 2009 Hurriyet Daily News
    URL: www.hurriyetdailynews.com/n.php?n=washington-blames-ankara-for-trouble-in-armenian-issue-2010-02-

    — On Mon, 2/22/10, Hikmet Ersoy <[email protected]> wrote:

    From: Hikmet Ersoy <[email protected]>
    Subject: TURKIYE ARTIK TEK BASINA…
    To: “Turkish Forum” <[email protected]>, , “dtk (Dunya Turkleri Konseyi)” <[email protected]>

    Bildigimiz gibi ABD DIS Isler Komitesi 4.mart gunu bizi ilgilendiren cok kritik bir oylama yapacak.
    Anlasilan o ki uzun yillardan beri “Soykirim..” tasarisinin gecmemesi icin Kongre de Turkiye lehine lobi yapan
    Yahudi Kuruluslari Israil-Turkiye gerginligi nedeni ile bu kez seyirci kalacakmis….Ve savasmamizi beklemeyin demisler.
    ( Sebebi herhalde hepimiz biliyoruz…!!! )
    Zaten ortalikda Turk lobisi denilecek bir sey yok… Daha once Bush ve Clinton aksine karar cikmasini onlemislerdi…
    O tarihlerde Musevi lobisi gercekden bizi desteklemisti…
    Fakat anlasiliyor ki Obamanin gucu bugun yeterli olmayacak…
    AIPAC ( En guclu Israil lobisi ) parmagini bile kipirdatmayacakmis…
    ADL ( Etkili Yahudi toplulugu ) Herhangi bir calisma icinde degiliz,demis.
    JEWISH STREET – Pozisyonumuzu olmayacak demis…
    Butun bunlarin karsiliginda Turk Dis Isleri “Kiyamet kopar ve Turkiyenin baski gordugunde geri adim atan degil
    aksine cok sert….!!!! tepki veren bir yapiya sahip oldugunu ..!!!! ” hatirlatmislar ilave olarak da “ABD ile iliskilerimiz
    gozden gecirilir..” demisler….!!!!!!!!!.
    Sonucda “Haticeye degil, neticeye bakacagiz…” . Insallah Amerikalilar bu tepkimizden korkarlar….!!!!! ve
    oy birligi ile lehimize karar verirler…!!!!
    H.E