PLEASE, TEACH THE CHILDREN WELL! 

To: mcollins@embassymag.ca 

Dear Michelle Collins,  

Please allow me to formulate my op-ed under the following headings in order to provide you with a thoughtful rebuttal to your article ” Turkey Decries Toronto School Board Genocide Course”  (Embassy, Canada, August 27th, 2008.)  

GREEK-ARMENIAN COLLUSION AGAINST TURKEY:    

The accounts of Turkish-Armenian history provided by a Greek-Canadian (Liberal MP, Jim Karygiannis) and an Armenian-Canadian (ANC Exec. Dir., Aris Babikian) in your article are so typically distorted, that they can hardly be considered as much more than “settling of an old score” via “political lynching”.  It is quite in keeping with the Greek-Armenian collusion during the ill-fated invasion and destruction of Izmir by Greek army (1919) which, in turn, ignited the Turkish Independence War (1919-1922.)  This anti-Turkish Greek-Armenian complicity was re-established in 1974 after the failed attempt by the Greek-Cypriots to ethnically cleanse Cyprus of its Turkish-Cypriot population  which triggered a military intervention by one of the three guarantors, Turkey.   What we see in Toronto today is just another link in that anti-Turkish Greek-Armenian-collusion chain.   

GENOCIDE CHARGES UNFOUNDED:   

Babikian’s version of history is so “Diaspora” that one can easily write a 500-page book on it, effortlessly.  I don’t have time to write it, so I’ll try to make my response as manageable as possible. While some amongst us may be forgiven for taking the ceaseless Armenian propaganda at face value, merely because they are repeated so often, it is difficult and painful for us, Turks, most of whom are themselves the descendants of Turkish survivors of the yet mostly untold, readily dismissed out of bias, or ignored massacres of Turks during the Balkan Wars of 1912-13, the  World War I of 1914-18, and the Turkish Independence War of 1919-1922.  Collectively termed, “seferberlik” (meaning “the mobilization” in Turkish,) those endless  war years of 1912-1922 rained death and destruction on Turkish people.  The Ottoman Empire was under vicious attacks from all corners and Armenians shamelessly sided with the invading enemy armies when not violently revolting.   Those countless, nameless, faceless Turkish victims, doing nothing more than defending their home like any citizen anywhere in the world would do, are killed again today with those politically motivated and baseless charges of Armenian genocide.  

GENOCIDE CLAIMS IGNORE “THE SIX T’S” OF THE TURKISH-ARMENIAN CONFLICT: 

Allegations of Armenian genocide are racist and dishonest history. They are racist because they imply that Turkish or Muslim dead are not important, only Armenian or Christian dead are.  This racist approach ignores the immense Turkish suffering: about 3 million dead during the WWI; around half a million of them at the hands of Armenian nationalists.  By ignoring the suffering of one side completely, any war, including the American civil war, may be made to look like a genocide.  And the allegations of Armenian genocide are dishonest because they deliberately  dismiss “The Six T’s” of the Turkish-Armenian conflict:  

1)  Tumult (as in many violent Armenian armed uprisings between 1882 and 1920)  

2)  Terrorism (by Armenian nationalists and militias from 1882-1920 perpetrated on non-combatant Muslim civilians, mostly Muslim women and children, and elderly men)  

3)  Treason (Armenians joining the invading enemy armies and killing their Muslim neighbors and other fellow citizens, including the Ottoman-Jews)

4)  Territorial demands (where Armenians were a minority, not a majority) 

5)  Turkish suffering and losses (i.e. those caused only by the Armenian nationalists) 

6)  Tereset (Temporary Resettlement) triggered by the first five T’s above and amply documented as such; not to be equated to the Armenian misrepresentations as genocide.)

Armenians, thus, effectively put an end to their millennium of relatively peaceful and harmonious co-habitation in Anatolia with Muslims by killing their Muslim/Turkish neighbors and openly joining the invading enemy.  Western diplomats and Christian missionaries were behind all of the “6 T’s”  listed above. 

TURKISH VIEWS CENSORED ACROSS THE EDITORIAL BOARDS DUE TO A “CONSENSUS OF BIAS”

Excluding responsible opposing views in covering any controversial issue  is a form of censorship which violates the notion of freedom of speech.  Decent people everywhere have a responsibility to ensure that the public is given a fair chance to hear all sides of a controversy such as the Turkish-Armenian conflict.  “Partisan accounts” of history should not be taught  children as “settled history” .  We must all strive to “teach the children well.”  Fairness, honesty, and truth are all that I ask. 

HERE IS THE BIG PICTURE:

Millennium:  Turks and Armenians—and other Muslims and Christians— enjoyed a reasonably harmonious co-habitation in Anatolia for a millennium (that’s a thousand years!) under that “crescent” that the Greek-Armenian conspiracy loves to demonize. 

THE LOYAL NATION: 

Turks liked and trusted the Armenian subjects of the Ottoman Empire so much that Turks called the Armenians “Millet-i Sadika” (the loyal nation.)  Armenians enjoyed high standards of living in the Ottoman Empire mostly engaging in trade, construction, arts, and more, while Muslims did most of the heavy lifting of the empire such as agriculture, soldiery, administration.  (It is interesting to note that some Armenian propagandists use this as a proof of inequity, however, when the Armenians were given the right to soldiery after 1908, the Armenians invented ways to get out of that civic duty (see the letter by Armenians sent to the Lausanne Conference in 1923 asking for the right to be free from soldiery to be bestowed upon the Armenian community.)

PROSPERITY & STABILITY: 

The above picture, i.e. with all its shortcomings and/or defects, was still the nearest thing to perfection, given the state of humanity through the middle ages around the world, especially in Europe with wars, conquests, colonization, slavery, mass killings, mass deportations, crusaders, inquisitions,  holocausts, pogroms, and more.   Compared to all this mayhem in Europe in the last millennium, the Ottoman Empire with its unique “ millet system”,  was so peaceful and orderly that it could be considered the USA or Canada of Europe at the time.  Armenians were one of the major beneficiaries of this centuries-long stability. 

ARMENIAN REBELLIONS, TERRORISM, TREASON, TERRITORIAL DEMANDS: 

All that started changing for the  Turkish-Armenian relations after 1878 Berlin Peace Conference.  Russia started claiming special protector’s right over the Ottoman-Armenian community with an keen eye towards capturing Istanbul and the straits (Bosporus & Dardanelles) to extend the Russian imperial reach into warm waters of the Mediterranean. Britain and France were not exactly innocent bystanders as they were eyeing other parts of the Ottoman Empire for themselves.  The U.S. Protestant missionaries, headquartered in Boston, with their many educational and medical facilities dotting Anatolia used as convenient cover for their missionary activities, focused their attention on the Armenian community once they realized that proselytization of Muslims, Jews, or Greeks were nearly impossible.  The Boston missionaries started dividing and polarizing not only  the communities of the Ottoman Empire but also the Ottoman-Armenian community itself.  The missionary sermons were incendiary, pitting Armenians against Turks, Muslims against Christians, and even Protestants against the Gregorians and Catholic.    Thus, these religious men abused the traditional hospitality of Turks by organizing a hate-filled resistance among the Armenians against the Turkish rule, causing untold miseries on all sides…  These men of god, thus, caused much spilling of innocent blood  in the name of god.  In that sense, the Protestant missionaries may well be considered the guiltiest party of them all, followed by Tsarist Russia, Imperial Britain, Colonialist France, and Western media (The New York Times, for example, topping the list in biased coverage by publishing 145 anti-Turkish articles in 1915 alone with an incredible “ZERO” Turkish rebuttals allowed!)

ARMENIANS REVOLUTIONARY ORGANIZATIONS LAUNCHED A BLOODY CAMPAIGN:

The  Armenians started creating revolutionary organizations: “Ermenakan” in Van, Turkey (1882), “Hunchack” in Geneva, Switzerland (1887),  Dashnaksutiun in Tbilisi, Georgia (1890) and many others of many sizes and locations.  Almost without exception, they were all bent on armed resistance against the Turkish rule.  The Armenians used propaganda, agitation, terror, rebellions, and supreme treason, in that order, from 1882 to 1915, when finally some of the Armenians (not all) were sent on a Tereset (Temporary Resettlement).  Tereset was a justified military measure because the Armenian bands would conduct violent raids on the unprotected Muslim villages, frustrate the Ottoman military supply lines, and even harass the rear of the Ottoman Army during a time of war.   No country (including the U.S. and Canada) would tolerate this kind of wide open rebellion, pandemic treason, and omnipresent terror to be put into action by any community, large or small, at a time of war the least of all. 

ARMENIAN NATIONALISTS USE CIVILIANS AS “HUMAN SHIELDS” AFTER DEVASTATING ATTACKS ON MUSLIMS:

The Armenian bands would launch their bomb and gun attacks during the night and then hide in  ordinary homes during the day, turning Armenian women and children to little more than human shields for their murderous and treasonous acts.  Those who cry out today “Why did the Turks force some helpless Armenian women and  children to move?” should re-phrase their questions and first ask the nationalist Armenian leaders “Why did you use the non-combatant Armenian women and children as your cover before and human shields after your dastardly acts of terror against the Muslims?” 

DO DIASPORA STORIES PROVE GENOCIDE?

What most coverage in the media describe are personal tragedies experienced by Armenians.  Note that corresponding personal tragedies on the Turkish side, such as mine, are neither reported nor investigated, nor even wondered at all, in the Western media.   While it is not this writer’s intention to minimize the Armenian suffering, it must be questioned as to how it can be considered as “separate” from the Muslim suffering in the same area, same era, and under same conditions, when there was a terrible world war was going on that engulfed the Christian and Muslim communities producing an irregular warfare.  How is my Turkish grandparents’ suffering caused by Ottoman-Christians any less than Armenians’ suffering caused by Armenian rebellions, terrorism, treason, territorial demands, and Tereset?  How is Turkish suffering any less painful than Armenian suffering?    How are Turkish dead belittled and ignored while Armenian dead are exaggerated and glorified?   I am sure Armenians lived through some or most of those personal horror stories s often told in the media (though definitely not all of them.)   But they pale in comparison to what we, Turks, had to endure at hands of the likes of those Armenian terrorists, rebels, traitors, backstabbers, and murderers.   My personal family story is much more tragic than most Armenians’, if anyone cares to know about it, please read the following essay of mine as it is too painful to write it here again:  TURKISH LAST NAMES : HONEST STORY TELLERS  : 

PERSONAL TRAGEDIES BY THEMSELVES DO NOT MAKE IT A GENOCIDE:

Not all killings, not all sufferings fall automatically under the classification “genocide”.  The U.N. 1948 definition is crystal clear:  there must be an intention to destroy all or part of a community.  Without intention, a murder is just that, a murder, and penal code can amply deal with that.  The Armenians or their sympathizers have never proven Turkish intent to annihilate Armenians.  In fact, History shows that just the contrary is true:

a)  a millennium of peaceful co-habitation between Turks and Armenians;

b) endowment of Ottoman-Armenians with a “ loyal nation” status;

c) highest posts for Armenians in all walks of Ottoman life (the parliament, politics, diplomacy, military, trade, business, art…);

d)  all of the above followed by, unfortunately, an intense period of organized Armenian terror, rebellions, treason, and territorial demands, and more…

e)  triggering a temporary military, wartime safety measure of moving only those Armenians who posed a serious threat to Ottoman Empire’s war effort;

f) Note that Armenians of Istanbul, Izmir, Edirne, Aleppo and other places were not moved, as they were not considered a threat;

g) Armenians in the armed services, doctors, and most inner city people were also kept out of the Tereset (Temporary resettlement) order; 

h) detailed steps were described in countless official orders—too many to be dismissed casually—on how to move the community safely and orderly and claim the properties back on their return (contrary to common misperception, many did return!)

There is more, much more, but I already wrote most of them at www.turkla.com.   I don’t want to re-write them here.  You are welcome to check it out yourself.

ETHOCIDE:

Frustrated by the persistently biased coverage of the Turkish-Armenian civil war during WWI and the ensuing censorship of Turkish views in American media, I have coined a new term back in 2003—my humble gift to the English language and a thoughtful and long overdue supplement to Rafael Lemkin’s definition of genocide: “ethocide”.

A brief definition of ethocide is “extermination of ethics by systematic and malicious mass-deception in exchange for political, economical, social, religious, and other favors and benefits.”

The civil war that had been raging up to 1915 and the Tereset it inevitably resulted in was no genocide, but what the Armenians and their sympathizers did in misrepresenting it ever since is clearly ethocide.

I urge . therefore, an end to the ethocidal coverage of the Turkish-Armenian conflict in the Western media and academia.  

LAST WORD: 

It was a wartime tragedy, engineered, provoked, and waged by Armenians, with support from Russia, England, France, the U.S., and Western media; but not genocide.

Please, teach the children well!

Ergun KIRLIKOVALI

3.Son of Turkish survivors from both maternal and paternal sides

###