Tag: Davutoglu

  • The Death of Turkey’s Democracy

    The Death of Turkey’s Democracy

    “I no longer recognize the country where I was raised.”

    • Article
    • Comments (18)
    more in Opinion »

    BY DANI RODRIK

    I no longer recognize Turkey, the country where I was raised and spend most of my time when I am not teaching in the U.S.

    It wasn’t so long ago that the country seemed to be taking significant strides in the direction of human rights and democracy. During its first term in government, between 2002 and 2007, Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s Justice and Development Party (AKP) worked hard to bring the country into the European Union, to reform its legal regime, and to relax restrictions on Kurds.

    But more recently, the same government has been responsible for a politics …

    ====================== COMMENTS  =======================

    • i want to correct something:
      below the picture in the article written that AKP supporters holding the banner. it’s a clear lie. the pictures on the banner belong to some people who were put in jail because of the mentioned court cases, which are supported by government. and the people who are against these series of cases claim that erdogan is manipulated by the usa, and this dependence on usa causes turkey loose.
      supporters of erdogan are about 30-40 percent. and the total percentage of the islamists in turkey is at most 50%. but the percentage of dislike against usa is about 80%. it’s obvious that turkish people feel some problem with usa politics.
      maybe some people should give up trying to relate dislike against usa to non-democracy. even the lie i mentioned above in this article shows that some powers in usa can give up ethics and can easily slander others for some interests. maybe this can explain the 80%.
      finally, it’s weird that in such a big newspaper, writers can lie publicly, if they want to.

      2 Recommendations

        • Catherine Dempsey replied:
      • most of the turkish people believe that they will not accept turkey into the union. it was the same before the developments too. and many people don’t want to be included because of the attitude of the eu. although i don’t mind if they accept us or not, like many others, i support advancements in areas like human rights, in particular rights about ideological issues. it seems there is some progress, but relatively slow. but certainly, it does not go backwards, no matter what some people claim.


    • Turkey refuses to grant independence to the Kurdish people. Turkish war planes cross over the border to northern Iraq and bomb Kurdish villages practically every day, killing an maiming thousands of people whose only desire is to have their land, Kurdistan, gain independence.
      Turkey, cannot with a clear conscience, support the Palestinian people and at the same time so brutally refuse to recognize the legitimate rights of the Kurdish people.
      We cannot, we must not forget the genocide committed by Turkey against the Armenian people. Turkey s testing us all now. If we sit idle, Turkey will destroy the Kurds too.

      Recommend

  • TURKEY DEFENCE: Colorado company pleads guilty in military tech case

    TURKEY DEFENCE: Colorado company pleads guilty in military tech case

    (AP) – 7 hours ago

    DENVER — A Colorado company has pleaded guilty to illegally exporting defense technology to Turkey, South Korea, China and Russia.

    Federal authorities say Rocky Mountain Instrument Co. pleaded guilty Tuesday in federal court in Denver to one count of exporting defense technology without a license. The company must forfeit $1 million, which authorities say represents what it made from criminal activities.

    The company was also sentenced to five years of probation, during which it must develop an export control compliance program.

    David Gaouette, U.S. attorney in Colorado, says most of the technology involved is used by U.S. troops in Afghanistan.

    Authorities say the Lafayette-based company exported such items as prisms and technical data about optics used in military applications between April 1, 2005, and Oct. 11, 2007.

    Related articles

    • Colo. company pleads guilty in military tech case
      The Associated Press – 7 hours ago
    • More coverage (1) »
  • Iran and Turkey: Friends Today, Rivals Tomorrow?

    Iran and Turkey: Friends Today, Rivals Tomorrow?

    23A6A403 8729 4F31 97EB 85F0C29B8BD8 mw800 mh600 s

    Monday, 21 June 2010 23:37

    Written by RFE/RL

    0 Comments
    By Robert Tait (RFE/RL) -- It is the friendship Western policymakers wish they could have prevented: Turkey -- secular, Western-leaning, and a key member of NATO -- drawing close to a resurgent theocratic Iran whose nuclear program and geopolitical ambitions present a full-frontal challenge to the established international order. Suspicions that Turkey is abandoning the Western orbit for a closer alignment with its Muslim Middle Eastern neighbors were reinforced last month when the Turkish prime minister, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, flew to Tehran to sign a nuclear fuel-swap deal -- brokered along with the Brazilian president, Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva -- aimed at blocking further UN sanctions against Iran's uranium enrichment program. Coming on the back of flourishing trade ties, the move -- ultimately unsuccessful -- was seen as a manifestation of Erdogan's growing affinity for Iran and its president, Mahmud Ahmadinejad, whom he had previously described as "a very good friend." The image of a new Tehran-Ankara axis was further enhanced by Israel's deadly interception of a Gaza-bound Turkish aid flotilla on May 31, which led to the deaths of nine Turks and drew international condemnation. The incident created the impression of a united Turkish-Iranian front against Israel and in support of Hamas, the Islamist group that runs Gaza. The growing warmth is a far cry from the frosty, mutually suspicious relations that endured for years between the two neighbors following the 1979 Islamic Revolution which ousted the Western-backed shah from power in Iran. Yet, according to some analysts, there may be a sting in the tail. Trigger Suspicions Far from being the gateway to a long-standing alliance, Turkey's new engagement with the Middle East and vocal support for the Palestinians could trigger Iranian suspicions and eventually restore the formerly competitive relationship between the two countries. Meir Javedanfar, an Iranian-born analyst with the MEEPAS think tank in Israel, believes Turkey's new Middle East-centered foreign policy -- which includes rapprochement with Iran's close ally, Syria -- is a threat to Tehran's desire to be the Islamic world's dominant power. "Both countries are rivals for the same title, which is leader of the Islamic world," Javedanfar says. "And the Iranians have a set of economic and political advantages to offer any country who wants to side with them, and the Turks have another set of advantages which are far more than the Iranian ones. 86FF5EFB C746 4AF7 BD26 779BD1A441D7 mw800 s"I can best describe it as the Turkish government being able to offer business class seats to any potential customer who wants to ally itself with Turkey, and the Iranians can offer a coach or economic class. I think the majority of people are going to be attracted to the business class rather than the other one, unless they have to." If that assessment comes as a relief to Western diplomats fretting over Turkey's supposed defection, there may be a sobering corollary. Javedanfar fears the results of any renewed Iranian-Turkish rivalry will be greater efforts by the leadership in Tehran to acquire a nuclear-weapons capability. "When it comes to economic power, when it comes to military power, when it comes to diplomatic position, Iran is inferior to Turkey," Javedanfar says. "So they are going to look at areas where they are superior and the only other one where they can gain an edge over the Turks, one of the very few areas, is the nuclear program. "Turkey is not a nuclear power. Therefore, Iran would have even more of a reason and an excuse to become a nuclear power in order to gain an edge over their Turkish rivals." Likely Launch Pad The prediction may seem far-fetched, yet hardly more so than an article published earlier this year by the Jahan News website -- believed to be linked to the Iranian intelligence services -- that identified Turkey as the likely launch pad for a future war against Iran. Written by Farid Al Din Hadad Adel, grandson of Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the article asked: "Which country can hope for the entry of its European and American friends into the arena of war, if it enters into war against us? The answer is clear. Turkey is the only option for the advancement of the West's ambitions." The Islamic regime has a history of suspiciousness towards Turkey. In 2005, the Revolutionary Guards closed Tehran's newly built Imam Khomeini Airport for "security reasons" because a Turkish company had been awarded the contract to run it. The airport was only reopened after the contract was canceled and awarded to an Iranian consortium. In the same year, the Turkish mobile-phone operator Turkcell was stripped of a $2 billion contract giving it a stake in a private Iranian mobile network. Murat Bilhan, vice chairman of the Istanbul-based think tank TASAM and who served as a Turkish diplomat in Iran, believes continuing Iranian disquiet over its Western neighbor has recently surfaced in its rejection of Ankara's offer of mediation in relations with the United States. Even the recent nuclear swap deal may have been accepted only because of Brazil's role, he suggests. "Iran feels itself a little split off from the Western connections because it's in the hands of Turkey," says Bilhan. "They feel rivalry, as a competitor, and they would not like Turkey to be stronger than Iran. That's the feeling in Iran, in Iranian statesmen, in Iranian decision makers, policy planners, and such. "So Turkey, for Iran, is, in a way, not a threat but something to get along [with], to share the same geography, not to create any problems, but not to be overwhelmed by." Afraid Of Iran A further source of potential friction could be Turkey's increasing closeness to Arab states in the Persian Gulf, most of which fear Tehran's nuclear activities, Bilhan says. "There are some contradictions in the Turkish position in the sense that Turkey should be aware that the Arab nations in the Persian are too much afraid of Iran and they just feel threatened by the Iranian existence and Iranian ambitions in the region, especially their nuclear ambitions," Bilhan says. "So when Turkey supports the Iranian position, it might contradict its own Arab policy because the Arabs have enmity towards Iran." Turkish officials argue that Turkey's geography and shared Muslim heritage make it uniquely qualified in the Western alliance to win Iran's trust. In private, they admit that negotiations with the Islamic regime can be fraught -- citing the Iranian political system's diverse power centers. They also say the two countries still have important differences, notably over Iraq. "We are not defending Iran, we are looking after our own interests" one Turkish official, speaking on condition of anonymity, told RFERL. "We don't want to see a nuclear Iran in the military sense at all. Our aim in that is the same as other countries. It's just our approach that's different." He added: "On Iraq, we don't see eye-to-eye with Iran at all. We want an all-inclusive government in Iraq made up Shi'ites, Sunnis, and Kurds, whereas Iran only wants a Shi'ite government. We are not always in parallel with Iran on many issues. "But I don't think they should see us as a rival. The fact that we can talk to almost everyone, in contrast to them, means Iran should use us to try and get back into the international community. That's what we are trying to do."

    RFE/RL

    Copyright (c) 2009. RFE/RL, Inc. Reprinted with the permission of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, 1201 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington DC 20036.

  • Turkey opposition gains ground amid eastward drift

    Turkey opposition gains ground amid eastward drift

    By SUZAN FRASER (AP) – 23 hours ago

    ANKARA, Turkey — Turkey rallied behind Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan in his blistering condemnation of Israel after its commando raid on an aid ship to Gaza.

    But as dust settles from the May 31 attack, Turkey’s resurgent opposition seems to be gaining traction by articulating fears that Erdogan is steering NATO’s only Muslim member away from the West, jeopardizing EU membership efforts, and even undermining a long-running battle against separatist Kurds.

    The views of the Republican People’s Party — which considers itself a guarantor of secular values and enjoys a power base among Western-leaning urban elites — are increasingly important.

    The movement has a popular new leader following the resignation of its chairman over a sex scandal and many have high hopes that he can rejuvenate the party, presenting a viable alternative to Erdogan and anchoring Turkey firmly back in its Western orientation.

    Kemal Kilicdaroglu made a name for himself by exposing corruption within Erdogan party’s that led to two senior officials stepping down.

    While condemning the Israeli assault that killed eight Turks and a Turkish-American and calling on Jerusalem to end its Gaza blockade, Kilicdaroglu’s party has also criticized Erdogan’s confrontational style against Israel and accused the prime minister of trying to use outrage to win elections due next year.

    “We are witnessing a serious crisis of confidence between (Erdogan’s party) and the West … This crisis must end immediately,” Kilicdaroglu said in a speech.

    A recent opinion poll shows that the Republican People’s Party has made gains since Kilicdaroglu took the party reins, although Erdogan’s Justice and Democracy Party remains more popular.

    The survey, conducted by the Konsensus research company for Haberturk newspaper and published Saturday, shows 38.8 percent backing Erdogan’s party against 31.3 percent for Kilicdaroglu’s Republicans — up from the 25 percent support for the party under the previous leadership. No margin of error was given.

    “The belief that there is no alternative to (Erdogan’s party) has ended with Kilicdaroglu becoming chairman,” Konsensus general manager Murat Sari was quoted as saying.

    The survey, however, showed that Kilicdaroglu gained support from a nationalist party, not from Erdogan’s ruling party, suggesting that skepticism about the opposition remains widespread.

    The Republican Party has long projected a strict — and some say intolerant — form of secularism that has opposed among other things, young women wearing Islamic-style headscarves at universities.

    It claims to be the heir to the legacy of Turkey’s modernizing founding father, Mustafa Kemal Ataturk. But its coziness with the military, elitist attitudes toward rural Turkey, and opposition to some reforms designed to boost Turkey’s EU membership chances have driven many liberal supporters away. Many also accept that Erdogan’s party, in power since 2002, has been a better steward of economic and social reforms.

    For his part, Erdogan has alarmed liberals with his threats to scuttle Turkey’s longstanding alliance with Israel, his questioning of Washington’s international leadership, and his willingness to cultivate friendships with hardline Islamic nations like Iran and Syria.

    Increasingly, analysts who praised Erdogan for raising Turkey’s standing in the Middle East are now warning that the government is acting out of emotion not reason in its dealings with Israel and the West.

    “Unless someone says stop, the present atmosphere threatens to marginalize Turkey in the long term,” wrote Asli Aydintasbas, a columnist for liberal Milliyet newspaper.

    Overwhelming support for Erdogan in elections in 2007 “were not for Hamas but for a ‘western Muslim’ Turkey that increased its global weight both in the East and in the West,” Aydintasbas said.

    Military analysts have voiced concerns that Turkey’s new foreign policy is harming its interests, undermining its fight against autonomy-seeking Kurdish rebels.

    The United States has been providing intelligence on Kurdish rebel movements in northern Iraq, where a bulk of the rebels are in hiding, while Turkey uses drones recently purchased from Israel to spy on the guerrilla group.

    On Saturday, about 60 rebels attacked a military outpost on the Turkish-Iraqi border, killing nine soldiers, according to the military.

    The attack raised questions as to how they were able to reach the outpost undetected and some speculated that the United States may have withheld crucial intelligence.

    But Maj. Gen. Ferit Guler, secretary-general of the Turkish military, insisted that a successful intelligence cooperation with the United States was still in place.

    The military has long supported Turkey’s military alliance with Israel, which has provided crucial military equipment, such as the drones and modernized Turkish fighter jets and tanks.

    Erdogan insists it is committed to its alliance with the United States and NATO and that his government still seeks EU membership, although he has also accused European countries of having a “secret agenda” to keep Turkey out.

    Related articles

    • Turkey’s New Diplomacy
      International Herald Tribune – 1 day ago
    • Turkey: no Blue Stream gas to Israel for now
      Industrial Fuels and Power (blog) – 1 day ago
    • Turkish energy minister says no gas transportation to Israel via Blue Stream
      Trend News Agency – 2 days ago
    • More coverage (1) »
  • Wait and See Game for Turkey’s Enforcement of UN Sanctions on Iran

    Wait and See Game for Turkey’s Enforcement of UN Sanctions on Iran

    Dorian Jones | IstanbuL

    21 June 2010

    ahmedinajad erdogan 17may10 480 eng 300 eng

    Photo: AFP

    Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad flashes the V-sign for victory as Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan looks on after the Islamic republic inked a nuclear fuel swap deal in Tehran (File Photo – 17 May 2010)

    Related Articles

    • Turkey Troops, Kurdish Rebels Clash Near Iraq Border
    • US Defense Secretary: Europe Pushing Turkey ‘Eastward’
    • Israel Moves to Repair Relations With Turkey

    This month, Turkey voted against the United Nations Security Council’s fourth round of sanctions against Iran. With Turkey’s Islamic rooted government increasing its economic ties with Iran in the past few years, fears are arising that the pivotal Western ally is in danger of swinging eastward because of resistance in Europe to its bid for membership of the European Union.

    Despite growing international tensions over Iran’s nuclear energy program, the Turkish government has forged ahead with energy deals with Iran, expanding its dependency on energy with the nation.

    These deals put Turkey in a precarious situation: to enforce or not to enforce the UN sanctions imposed on its neighbor Iran.

    Turkey has long been seen as a bridge between East and West. But its belief that sanctions are ineffective and that there are dangers in pushing the Islamic republic into a corner is likely to change its relationship with Western nations.

    Earlier this month Turkish foreign minister Ahmet Davutoglu expressed concern over the existing sanctions against Iran.

    AP

    “Turkey and Iran’s trade volume is around $10 billion,” he says. “And it can rise to $30 billion if sanctions are lifted.”

    Iran’s energy resources are seen as important by Ankara to break its dependency on Russian energy.

    Iran expert Gokhan Cetinsayar of Sehir University says that in addition to its dependency on gas, there are other trade initiatives with Iran that are economically key to Turkey.

    “75,000 trucks going on between Turkey and Iran every year,” said Cetinsayar. “Now there are energy deals. You know how important the Iranian natural gas and all other agreements and initiatives are economically important for Turkey.

    With large families usually depending for their livelihoods on cargo trucks, its estimated as many a million Turkish people depend on Iranian trade.

    With its increasing economic ties with Iran, there are growing fears that Turkey will balk at enforcing the UN sanctions against Iran.

    Turkish foreign minister spokesman Burak Ozugergin says Turkey has already paid a heavy economic price for UN policies with another of its neighbors, Iraq.

    “At the beginning of the 90’s, the Turkish volume of trade with Iraq was around the 15 to 20 percent mark of our total volume of trade. The next year, after the imposition of sanctions, this trickled down to almost zero,” said Ozugergin. “Money is not everything. But at least if it did work then we might be able to say to our public, ‘look it was for a good a cause.’ But can we really honestly say that looking back? For Iran again we don’t think it will help to solve the nuclear issue and perhaps may work against it.”

    The new sanctions on Iran are expected to cut into the present $10 billion trade volume. It could possibly undermine its energy policy as well. But political scientist Nuray Mert of Istanbul University say some western nations may now not be able to depend on Turkey.

    “I was inclined to think that at the end of the day Turkey will join the club when it comes to realization of these sanctions,” she said. “But nowadays I can see the government is planning to avoid these sanctions. Because now we have Turkey signing a lot of economic agreements, against the policy of sanctions.”

    For now Turkey has remained circumspect over enforcing new sanctions. One foreign ministry official said “you will have to wait and see.” Analysts say Iran would probably reward any breaking of sanctions with lucrative energy deals. But the political cost could be high because of Turkey’s aspirations for joining the EU. The coming weeks will see Ankara facing a difficult a choice.

  • Turkey’s Hollow Prize

    Turkey’s Hollow Prize

    pic

    Freedom’s Edge

    Turkey’s Hollow Prize

    Claudia Rosett, 06.18.10, 11:21 AM EDT

    Washington’s Woodrow Wilson Center dishonors its own public service award.

    Canada Free Press
    June 19 2010

    By Claudia Rosett Friday, June 18, 2010
    – Forbes

    It’s time Congress pulled the plug on Washington’s taxpayer-subsidized
    Woodrow Wilson Center for International Scholars, which has turned
    itself into a global joke. With Turkey’s leaders coquetting as the new
    best bedfellows of Iran and embracing the terrorists of Hamas, the
    Wilson Center has just bestowed its `Public Service’ award on Turkey’s
    foreign minister, Ahmet Davutoglu.

    In tandem with rewarding Davutoglu for catalyzing `the development of
    Turkey’s foreign relations,’ the Wilson Center also honored a Turkish
    business tycoon, Ferit Sahenk, with its Woodrow Wilson Award for
    Corporate Citizenship. The two winners received their prizes at a
    banquet held Thursday evening at the plush Four Seasons Hotel in
    Istanbul.

    In a June 8 press release the Wilson Center’s president, former
    congressman Lee Hamilton, explained that Davutoglu and Sahenk had been
    chosen because `These two leaders personify the attributes we seek to
    honor at the Woodrow Wilson Center.’ I mean no insult to Sahenk’whose
    prizeworthy business skills I don’t question’but it’s hard to escape
    the conclusion that the chief attributes the Wilson Center has just
    sought to honor in Istanbul are antagonism toward American values
    (Davutoglu) and enormous amounts of money (Sahenk).

    Created in 1968 by an act of Congress, the Wilson Center describes
    itself on its website as a `nonpartisan institute,’ a `living,
    national memorial’ to President Woodrow Wilson, charged with
    `symbolizing and strengthening the fruitful relations between the
    world of learning and the world of public affairs.’ Functioning as a
    `public-private partnership,’ the Wilson Center in recent times has
    been receiving roughly one-third of its yearly operating funds from
    the U.S. government (in other words, from U.S. taxpayers). Thus
    credentialed by Congress and anchored in federal subsidies, it
    attracts the rest of its money from a global array of public and
    private sources. Its current annual expenses are budgeted at more than
    $37.3 million.

    Housed on prime real estate, just blocks from the White House, the
    Wilson Center occupies, ironically enough, a lavishly appointed
    eight-story wing of the Ronald Reagan International Trade Building. It
    has a big vestibule with polished granite and marble floors, some of
    Wilson’s words chiseled in stone, and multiple levels of roomy offices
    and meeting rooms, ample armchairs, a cafeteria and a private library.
    All this is supposed to serve the Center’s aim `to shed the light of
    the timeless on the timely.’

    >From this perch, with atrocious timing, the Wilson Center last August
    invited Davutoglu to receive its public service award this June, `in
    recognition of his lifelong service to the Turkish public.’

    This is a bizarre spin on Davutoglu’s major role in steering the
    Turkish state away from its former democratic allies such as the U.S.
    and Israel and toward its current collaboration with the tyrannies of
    Syria and Iran, and the Iranian-backed terrorists of Hamas. Author of
    a treatise titled `Strategic Depth,’ proposing a sweeping rethink of
    Turkish policy, Davutoglu has been a core player in Turkey’s
    increasingly anti-Western slant since Prime Minister Recep Tayyip
    Erdogan and his Islamic AK Party won power in 2002. In May 2009
    Davutoglu became foreign minister. Since then, Turkey’s shift toward
    Iran has achieved warp speed.

    In recent weeks Turkey’s leaders have backed a flotilla led by a
    terror-linked Turkish foundation, IHH, aiming to break Israel’s
    blockade against weapons reaching Iranian-backed terrorists in Gaza.
    Last month Turkey tried to deflect new sanctions on Iran, partnering
    in Tehran on a farcical uranium swap proposal with Brazil’s President
    Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva (winner last year of the Wilson Public
    Service award) and Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (candidate for
    next year’s Wilson award?). This month, in the United Nations Security
    Council, Turkey, along with Brazil, spurned the U.S. and voted against
    new sanctions on Iran.

    In all this Davutoglu has been a prime player, at one point likening
    the deaths of eight weapons-wielding Turkish `peace activists’ in the
    terror-linked Gaza flotilla to the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks that
    killed thousands of innocents in the U.S.

    These were just some of the offenses cited by Rep. Gary Ackerman (D.,
    N.Y.), chairman of the House Subcommittee on the Middle East and South
    Asia, in a June 15 letter urging Lee Hamilton to rescind the Wilson
    Center award to Davutoglu. Describing Turkey’s foreign policy under
    Davutoglu as `rife with illegality, irresponsibility and hypocrisy,’
    Ackerman highlighted Turkey’s continuing denial of the 1915 Armenian
    genocide and its current backing for both the genocidal regime in
    Sudan and the Holocaust-denying regime in Iran.

    Apparently that’s all OK with the Wilson Center, where `our
    nonpartisan work’ seems headed these days toward the global surrender
    of any principles whatsoever. A press officer there explained in an
    email this week that `Awardees are not chosen for their political
    views.’

    But it seems they are sometimes chosen for their fundraising
    potential. On that score, the spokeswoman in the same e-mail wrote
    that `These Awards Dinners have been critical for helping to raise
    some of the funding the Wilson Center needs.’ She continued, `In 2009,
    the Center identified Istanbul as an international city where a
    fundraising event of this kind would be viable.’

    Davutoglu’s co-honoree in Istanbul Thursday evening, Ferit Sahenk,
    happens to be one of the wealthiest men in Turkey. Head of the Dogus
    Holding business conglomerate founded by his father, Sahenk shows up
    on the Forbes list of World Billionaires with a net worth of $2.1
    billion.

    With the Wilson Center giving Sahenk its Award for Corporate
    Citizenship, have Sahenk or any of his Turkish cohorts pledged money
    to the Wilson Center? When I asked that question of the Center on
    Thursday afternoon, apparently no one could say , despite 12
    `development’ workers listed on the staff. I was passed along to
    another spokeswoman, who said she would look into it, but `People have
    to jump through hoops to get this information.’

    The way the Wilson Center puts it, Congress has been urging them `to
    raise more funding from private sources.’ Another way of looking at
    it, however, is that with Congress continuing to pour in money, the
    Wilson Center has been able to leverage its congressionally created
    and subsidized status into an ability to raise additional tens of
    millions all over the map’but to keep growing, it wants yet more.
    Among the top donors listed in the Center’s 2008-09 annual report,
    chipping in amounts for that period ranging from $100,000 to $2.5
    million apiece, are several that are themselves funded by U.S. tax
    dollars. These include the U.S. Agency for International Development,
    the U.S. State Department and the United Nations Development Program
    (which receives hundreds of millions annually from the U.S.
    government).

    Other top donors include: George Soros’s Open Society Institute, the
    Carnegie Corporation of New York, the Pew Charitable Trusts, the Exxon
    Mobil Corporation, the Swedish Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the
    Embassy of Mexico, Brazil’s Grupo EBX , South Korea’s LG Electronics,
    the Fellowship Fund for Pakistan and `Anonymous.’ United Airlines is
    listed as `The Official and Exclusive Airline Sponsor of the Woodrow
    Wilson Awards and the Woodrow Wilson Center.’

    Now comes the Davutoglu award, with its message that the Wilson Center
    in bestowing its favors is willing to treat even the most flagrantly
    anti-American views (and deeds) as irrelevant, while collecting money
    around the globe. Why should Congress keep fueling this morally blank,
    misleading and venal exercise with millions of American tax dollars?