Tag: Aegean problems

  • Greek Maritime Claims Rock Boat With Turkey

    Greek Maritime Claims Rock Boat With Turkey

    By ALKMAN GRANITSAS and STELIOS BOURAS

    ATHENS—Greece has renewed its territorial claims over a broad swath of disputed waters in the eastern Mediterranean where the indebted country hopes to find vast oil and gas deposits—a plan that risks sparking a confrontation with Turkey.

    Over the past several weeks, senior government officials have made a series of public statements—both at home and abroad—pointing to an almost two-decade-old international treaty granting those rights, one Greece hasn’t asserted until now. Athens also has been building support in other European capitals and stepping up a diplomatic campaign at the United Nations.

    WO-AM939A_GKWAT_G_20130307213305

    This week, Greek Prime Minister Antonis Samaras broached the topic with his Turkish counterpart, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, in a meeting in Istanbul where he called on Turkey to respect Greece’s rights under international law. So far, Ankara, which says those resources belong to Turkey and has warned for almost 20 years that any effort to draw new boundaries could lead to war, has called for further dialogue.

    Mr. Erdogan told Greek state television on Monday that “we’re approaching the issue with hope and without prejudices as we continue to work on territorial waters and Aegean-related matters. So long as the sides approach this matter with goodwill, there’s no reason not to get results.”

    For Greece, the stakes are enormous. An estimated €100 billion ($130 billion) of undersea hydrocarbon reserves—if proven—could ease the country’s crippling debt burden and make Greece a significant energy supplier for Europe, which wants to reduce its dependence on Russia. Mounting evidence of those reserves, along with recent moves by Cyprus to assert its own claims, have raised the stakes even further.

    Those reserves “will mean, clearly, wealth for Greece, wealth for Europe, a significant improvement in Europe’s energy security and a significant enhancement in Greece’s geopolitical role,” Mr. Samaras said in a recent speech to a business conference.

    For now, Greece is proceeding cautiously to avoid confrontation and is using U.N. procedures to gradually build its case. Athens’s end goal is clear: Greece hopes to gain international recognition for the exclusive use of a 200-nautical-mile zone around the country, basing its claims on the fact that it is a signatory to the U.N.’s Law of the Sea treaty and Turkey isn’t.

    To date, 165 nations and territories—including the European Union—have ratified the treaty. The U.S., which helped negotiate the pact in the 1980s, hasn’t ratified it but generally recognizes its provisions. Last summer, the Obama administration attempted to pass the treaty through the Senate, but fell one vote short of the two-thirds majority needed.

    Athens “is eager to assert its rights, but we don’t want to do anything that creates turbulence in the region,” said a senior Greek government official. “For now, we are proceeding slowly” through legal channels.

    One such step came in late January, when Greece’s foreign minister lodged a formal complaint at the U.N. after Turkey said in April that it would issue exploration licenses in a disputed area south of the Greek island of Rhodes.

    Turkey has said Greece’s counterclaims “have no basis in international law” and said it would take reciprocal steps at the U.N.

    In an interview with a Turkish newspaper this week, Turkish Energy Minister Taner Yildiz said energy issues shouldn’t be a source for tension in bilateral relations and said Ankara had no imminent plans to issue those licenses. “Don’t we know any exploration creates a controversy? Of course we know,” he told the Hurriyet newspaper.

    The next move for Greece, government officials said, would likely be another submission to the U.N. formally delineating Greece’s nautical coordinates. That would be a prelude to declaring an exclusive economic zone under the provisions of the sea treaty.

    Under terms of the 1994 treaty, Greece is entitled to extend its territorial rights to as many as 12 nautical miles from shore—double the six it now claims—and an exclusive economic zone of as many as 200 miles. Athens has refrained from doing so. In 1995, the year Greece ratified the treaty, Turkey’s parliament declared that any unilateral move to assert such claims would constitute a cause for war.

    At issue is the complex geography in the Aegean Sea that separates Greece from Turkey. After the breakup of the Ottoman Empire in the aftermath of World War I, Greece was given sovereignty over most of the islands that dot the Aegean and form a continuous archipelago between mainland Greece and Turkey.

    Under the present limit, Greece claims more than 40% of the Aegean as its own, compared with less than 10% for Turkey. By widening the limit to 12 miles, more than 70% of the Aegean and its seabed would be in Greek territory. A 200-mile exclusive economic zone would mean Greek claims also stretched far into the Mediterranean—enveloping Turkey—and reaching as far as Cyprus in the southeast.

    Geologists believe there are oil and gas deposits in the north Aegean, where drilling first began on a small scale in the early 1980s. More recently, a bonanza gas find off Israel’s coast in 2010, a second find off Cyprus since then, and various surveys have indicated that oil and gas is to be found in the eastern Mediterranean.

    Encouraged, Greece began hunting for hydrocarbons late last year in less-contentious areas west and south of the country. The government, which is struggling under a €300 billion debt burden, aims to auction off exploration licenses for those areas toward the end of this year.

    In February, French President François Hollande, during a visit to Athens, appeared to back Greece’s position by referring to the country’s legal rights under the Law of the Sea treaty.

    “The presence of gas deposits that can, first, be found, and then subsequently exploited, represents an opportunity for Greece and for Europe; and I believe that here, international law, the Law of the Sea, will prevail,” he said.

    —Emre Peker in Istanbul contributed to this article.

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887323978104578332352776971978

  • Turkey, Greece ‘close’ to Aegean peace, sources say

    Turkey, Greece ‘close’ to Aegean peace, sources say

    MURAT YETKİN

    ISTANBUL – Hürriyet Daily News

    Turkey and Greece are inching closer to each other on a conceptual peace deal regarding the Aegean dispute through a process of closed diplomacy, sources told the Hürriyet Daily News on Wednesday.

    Ongoing talks have reached a “promising level” following a meeting between the Turkish Foreign Ministry Undersecretary Feridun Sinirlioğlu and his Greek counterpart, Pavlos Apostolidis, in Çeşme in the Aegean province of İzmir on May 16-17, according to one diplomatic source.

    Coincidentally, that was also the day when the Turkish Armed Forces started two planned major military exercises, namely Denizkurdu and Efes, in the İzmir region.

    The source told the Daily News that the Athens meeting in early March had been planned as the last one before the Turkish elections on June 12, but due to a recent improvement in the process, the diplomats decided to meet spontaneously to examine the progress made.

    No details were revealed on those “exploratory” talks between the two rival neighbors, though the Daily News has learned that the concept involves both air space and continental shelf issues.

    The foreign ministries of the two countries agreed on this method following Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s visit to Athens last year. No papers on the talks were circulated and other than the diplomats involved, only the two foreign ministers, Ahmet Davutoğlu on the Turkish side and Dimitris Droutsas on the Greek side, know about the details of the talks.

    The peace package subject to talks also contains confidence-building measures, including increased relations between the nations’ armed forces and a mutual decrease in armament.

    Last August, Greek Prime Minister George Papandreou complained about low-level patrol flights of Turkish jets over the Aegean at a conference organized by the Turkish Foreign Ministry in the eastern province of Erzurum. Turkey also claims its airspace is frequently violated by Greek jets.

    Both Turkish and Greek sources were careful to make no connection between the cancellation of the last and ceremonial stage of the Turkish military exercises by the Turkish General Staff late Tuesday. On the contrary, they pointed to a high-level Greek military delegation visiting Ankara at the moment within the framework of improving relations.

    Yet, according to one source, the Turkish military may have some frustrations as the Foreign Ministry is carrying out all the work, despite consultations with the military.

    The two NATO countries came to the brink of war over sovereignty rights over two tiny and uninhabited islands near the Turkish coast in 1996. The crisis was solved with a degree of U.S. mediation, after which the two countries begun exploratory talks.

    via Turkey, Greece ‘close’ to Aegean peace, sources say – Hurriyet Daily News and Economic Review.

  • Turkey, Greece to revisit Aegean problems with fresh ideas

    Turkey, Greece to revisit Aegean problems with fresh ideas

    turkey greece erdoganDeep-rooted Aegean border problems will be re-examined Friday by the Turkish and Greek prime ministers, who are set to meet in Athens on the sidelines of an international climate summit.

    According to diplomats, however, there is no expectation of an instant breakthrough in resolving such problems even though Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s recent statements had fueled hopes to this effect.

    “We do not want [military] flights over the [Aegean] islands,” Erdoğan said in an interview with the Greek daily Kathimerini on Wednesday, asking that a compromise be reached through mutual understanding and effectively setting forth a series of proposals that could reduce tensions.

    By means of a compromise, Erdoğan suggested that NATO be invited to monitor how the two countries’ jets use the airspace over the Aegean since both neighbors are members of the alliance.

    Meanwhile, Erdoğan’s belief in the need to foster more civilian involvement in attempts to prepare sufficient groundwork for a solution to the bilateral problems could be counted as his second proposal.

    Another suggestion came from Erdoğan’s chief foreign policy advisor, İbrahim Kalın, who said at a conference in Athens that Turkey could annul its declaration of “casus belli” if Greece withdrew possible plans to expand its territorial waters to 12 miles.

    The suggestion was followed by calls from Turkey to eliminate all problems between the two countries in the Aegean so that both could benefit from tourism in the region.

    Apart from tourism, the two countries could also launch joint drilling efforts in the Aegean to explore potential hydrocarbon reserves.

    What makes these ideas more meaningful is that Turkey has removed Greece from its threat list, the National Security Policy Paper – widely known as the “red book.”

    “We should go over these issues step-by-step, without making them a matter of daily political consumption,” a senior diplomat told the Hürriyet Daily News & Economic Review on Thursday.

    “It should be noted Turkey seriously and sincerely wants to engage in a process of resolving current problems,” said the diplomat. However, there have been no concrete responses from Greek authorities on the suggestions made by their Turkish counterparts.

    Commentators from both sides have observed positive attitudes in both capitals about moving forward and finding a way to solve disputes. One form of evidence is that the exploratory talks between the two countries’ foreign ministries launched in the early 2000s have produced some progress in diplomats being able to introduce a road map for greater dialogue.

    Turkey and Greece disagree over territorial water borders, airspace and the sovereignty of some islets in the Aegean. Greece believes there are no gray areas regarding the sovereignty of some congested islets in the Aegean. According to diplomats, the sovereignty issue can only be solved through the European Court of Justice while other disputes could potentially be solved through bilateral mechanisms.

    However, it is not very likely the leaders will finalize any solution in the near future as diplomats believe “there are so many other things to do.”

    Hurriyet

  • Health Reasons Force Erdogan to Cancel Athens Visit

    Health Reasons Force Erdogan to Cancel Athens Visit

    Health Reasons Force Erdogan to Cancel Athens Visit

    Publication: Eurasia Daily Monitor Volume: 6 Issue: 119
    June 22, 2009
    By: Saban Kardas
    On June 20 Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan cancelled a planned trip to Athens. Although his health condition was offered as the reason for the last-minute cancellation, it did not prevent speculation that Erdogan sought to use the pretext of his health concern to protest about recent Greek diplomatic initiatives against Turkey.

    Erdogan was scheduled to visit Athens to attend the opening the new Acropolis Museum. Prior to the opening ceremony, Erdogan was expected to meet Greek Prime Minister Costas Karamanlis, and both were to address bilateral issues including the conditions of minorities, as well as recent developments regarding the Cyprus dispute (Cihan Haber Ajansi, June 19). On the morning of June 20, Erdogan attended some meetings in the Aegean town of Izmir. He was expected to fly to Athens later that afternoon and return to Turkey that night. It was later announced that Erdogan had telephoned Karamanlis and informed him of his cancellation. He told Karamanlis that he would like to visit Athens at the earliest opportunity. A statement from Erdogan’s office explained that due to sunstroke, which Erdogan experienced during his visit to Edirne on June 19, his doctors had recommended rest. On June 21 he also cancelled the rest of his program in Izmir and his trips inside Turkey, and returned to Istanbul to rest over the weekend (ANKA, June 20).

    Deputy Prime Minister Bulent Arinc told reporters on June 21 that Erdogan was in good condition, and would resume his functions the following day. Arinc added that Erdogan had experienced temporary hypertension related to weariness, but this was not a serious problem. After resting in Istanbul, Erdogan was expected in Ankara on June 23, to attend an AKP party meeting and also have a working lunch with E.U. ambassadors (Anadolu Ajansi, June 21).

    However, the official statement did not satisfy some diplomatic observers who believe that political motives were behind Erdogan’s last-minute decision. They suggested two issues which might have influenced Erdogan’s decision: Karamanlis’ public complaints about the Turkish Air Force allegedly violating Greek airspace in the Aegean Sea and the E.U. Presidency’s latest conclusions which referred to Turkey as a country of origin and transit in illegal immigration, at Greece’s urging (Radikal, Hurriyet Daily News, June 21). The Greek media also speculated that Erdogan might have cancelled his trip to express his displeasure over these developments. They argued that Erdogan might have wanted to avoid confronting Karamanlis on the Aegean and illegal immigrants’ issues (Anadolu Ajansi, June 20).

    An interrelated set of disputed claims by Ankara and Athens in the Aegean Sea has proved a major long-standing bilateral source of tension between the two countries. Due to the ongoing controversy over the delimitation of national airspace, Flight Information Regions (FIR) and military over-flight rights, Turkish and Greek fighters engage each other in tactical military provocations (so-called “dog-fights”), which frequently heighten tensions between the two countries. Greece considers the flights of Turkish jets in the disputed zones as violations of its national airspace or transgressions of the FIR. During his contacts in Brussels in the context of the E.U. Summit, Karamanlis reiterated Athens’s complaints concerning Turkish jets’ “violations of Greek airspace,” and added that he “discussed this issue with Obama and would raise it during [his] meeting with Erdogan” (www.cnnturk.com, June 19).

    The Greek attempt to use the E.U. as leverage to pressure Turkey on a different issue also reportedly angered Ankara. Last week, the European Council discussed the challenge of illegal immigrants, and ways to improve cooperation with countries of origin and transit. The presidency conclusions issued at the end of the summit announced that, as part of its external policies, the E.U. will seek to sign readmission agreements with major countries of origin and transit. By the time such agreements are concluded, the E.U. will require the implementation of existing bilateral agreements (www.eu2009.cz, June 19). Greece reportedly threatened to veto the presidency conclusions, if the European Council did not specify Turkey, along with Libya, as a key country of origin and transit. Although Turkey was not mentioned in the draft document, following last-minute changes, the final communiqué made reference to it (www.abhaber.com, June 19).

    Athens claims that a great majority of illegal immigrants arriving in Greece transit Turkey and it expects Ankara to be more cooperative in the readmission of those immigrants. Ankara claims that since the final destination of those immigrants are E.U. countries, Turkey cannot be expected to bear the heavy financial burden of readmitting them, which would cost over 1.2 million Euros and demands fairer burden-sharing (Hurriyet, June 20).

    The declared justification for Erdogan’s cancellation of his trip is perhaps true; yet, the very fact that it resulted in such speculation indicates the level of tension between the two countries. Athens has long blocked the progress of Turkish-E.U. relations, and the two neighbors even came to the brink of war over the Aegean issues in the 1990’s. In the post-1999 period, when the Turkish-E.U. talks were revitalized following the Helsinki Summit, bilateral relations entered a new phase. The resulting normalization of the relationship produced concrete results; in addition to launching diplomatic talks to discuss a resolution to the bilateral issues, Athens removed its objections to Ankara’s entry into the European Union. During the rapid wave of domestic reforms following the AKP’s accession to power in 2002, which resulted in the launch of membership talks in 2005, Erdogan developed a close working relationship with his Greek counterpart and visited Athens twice in 2004. However, parallel to the stalling of Turkey’s E.U. accession process since 2005, Turkish-Greek relations also experienced a downturn, which largely resulted from Turkey’s inability to resolve its differences with Greek Cypriots. If he is serious about his claim to revive Turkey’s E.U. bid, Erdogan must talk to his Greek counterpart and reach a consensus on bilateral and E.U. related issues. In this context, he might soon visit Athens.

    https://jamestown.org/program/health-reasons-force-erdogan-to-cancel-athens-visit/