Category: Regions

  • FORGET ARMENIA, TURKS SHOULD CONDEMN AMERICAN INDIAN GENOCIDE

    FORGET ARMENIA, TURKS SHOULD CONDEMN AMERICAN INDIAN GENOCIDE

    Massacre, Wounded Knee, South Dakota, December 1890

    Turkey is today beset on all sides by the shock doctrine strategy of the west, and from within by its US-backed marionette government. Now the Armenian Genocide issue has once again bubbled to the surface. Apologize! Apologize! yell the so-called Turkish liberals, egos stroked and, no doubt, palms greased by their western puppeteers. It’s the same old drama with the same stodgy cast burbling the same trite lines. As usual, the Turkish government does nothing, thus contributing to the confusion, apathy, and fear that stalk the land. But that’s the whole idea isn’t it?

    Turkish people! Instead of handwringing and moaning, ACT! Turkish people, you heirs of the Atatürk Revolution, Mustafa Kemal Atatürk gave you the right (and responsibility) to save your country. https://yunus.hacettepe.edu.tr/~sadi/dizeler/hitabe2.html ) Fight the rush-to-judgment efforts of the Armenian Genocide lobby. Every “Turkish child of future generations” should demand that their parliament immediately enact a resolution that condemns the American Indian Genocide. Turkish people…ACT! Defend your country against the dark powers that Mustafa Kemal Atatürk foresaw over eighty years ago. The facts of the catastrophe done to the American Indians are in plain sight and beyond dispute. Spain, Portugal, England, and, most importantly, the United States of America should stand condemned in the eyes of the world for the crimes committed against the aboriginal population in the Americas.

    More than 200 million Indians lost their lives on the combined North, Central, and South American continents after Columbus landed in 1492. The Indians in South and Central America were mostly enslaved to extract precious metals. The Indians in North America were displaced, starved, and slaughtered to make way for the enormous flow of European immigrants. Vast numbers died from European diseases, perhaps the first weapon of mass destruction, in this case, biological warfare. Surely Turkey has the right to defend itself from the Western claims of genocide, given the historically bloody hand of the West.

    From approximately 15-18 million North American Indians present in the days of Columbus, only 190,000 were left in the territorial United States in 1890. The destruction of the Southern Indians (the Cherokee, Choctaw, Chickasaw, and Creek tribes) resulted in the seizure and clearance of their enormously fertile forest lands (the Southern black belt) in order to expand both slavery and cotton production in Arkansas, Alabama, and Mississippi. In this manner, the red and black races were displaced, enslaved, and murdered in order for white America to prosper. The proof of this assertion is fully documented and unassailable.

    On the other hand, Turkey has welcomed the persecuted minorities of many nations. The same year that the destruction of the American Indians began, 1492, Turkey’s Sultan Bayezit II accepted with kindness and consideration the Jews expelled from Spain and Portugal. Similar compassion was rendered to Jews centuries later who fled Hitler’s genocide. Surely Turkey has the right, the responsibility, and moral authority to counter the orchestrated, poorly documented, rush-to-judgment of the Armenian Lobby and its collaborators, both western and Turkish.

    The horrific destruction of the sophisticated Native American cultural system was encouraged by the government of the United States, particularly under the administration of that so-called champion of so-called democracy, Andrew Jackson. By 1890, the American Indians were finished. Their numbers had been reduced by 98 percent over the 400 years since Columbus landed. By 1890 the United States government had seized 98 percent of their land. No greater genocide or land grab has existed in the history of the world. Surely Turkey has the right to challenge the unproven claim of so-called genocide by affirming through parliamentary resolution the well-documented genocide of an entire race of people by an act of policy by the government of the United States of America.

    It is high time that Turkey takes the offensive on the matter of genocide. In this day of widespread destruction, it is high time to remind America, Americans, and their government, that they are up to their ancestral elbows in the blood of the American Indians. The Turkish government must condemn the American Indian Genocide, or itself be condemned. And if you, the Turkish people, think that makes you a traitor, then read again Nazım Hikmet’s magnificent poem, Vatan Haini (“Traitor”) below, along with Atatürk’s statement of your “primary duty.”

    Cem Ryan, Ph.D.
    Istanbul
    21 December 2008

    TRAITOR


    “Nazim Hikmet is still continuing to be a traitor,
    We are a half-colony of American imperialism, said Hikmet.
    Nazim Hikmet is still continuing to be a traitor.”
    This came out in one of the Ankara newspapers,
    Over three columns, in a pitch-black screaming streamer.
    In an Ankara newspaper, beside a photograph of Admiral Williamson,
    smiling in 66 square centimeters, his mouth in his ears,
    the American admiral.
    America gave 120 million lira to our budget, 120 million lira.
    “We are a half-colony of American imperialism, said Hikmet.
    Nazim Hikmet is still continuing to be a traitor.”

    Yes, I am a traitor, if you are a patriot, if you are a defender of our homeland,
    I am a traitor to my homeland, I am a traitor to my country.
    If patriotism is your farms,
    if the valuables in your safes and your bank accounts is patriotism,
    if patriotism is dying from hunger by the side of the road,
    if patriotism is trembling in the cold like a cur and shivering from malaria in the summer,
    if sucking our scarlet blood in your factories is patriotism,
    if patriotism is the claws of your village lords,
    if patriotism is the catechism, if patriotism is the police club,
    if your allocations and your salaries are patriotism,
    if patriotism is American bases, American bombs, and American missiles,
    if patriotism is not escaping from our stinking black-minded ignorance,
    then I am a traitor.
    Write it over three columns, in a pitch-black screaming streamer,
    Nazim Hikmet is continuing to be a traitor, STILL!

    Nazim Hikmet
    28 July 1962

    (Translation: Hüda Cereb and James Ryan, 1 June 2005)

    ATATÜRK’S SPEECH TO TURKISH YOUTH
    O Turkish Youth! Your first duty is ever to preserve and defend the national independence, the Turkish Republic.

    That is the sole foundation of your existence and your future. This foundation is your most precious treasure. In the future, too, there will be ill-will, both in the country itself and abroad, which will try to tear this treasure from you. If one day you are compelled to defend your independence and the Republic, then, in order to fulfill your duty, you will have to look beyond the possibilities and conditions in which you might find yourself.

    It may be that these conditions and possibilities are altogether unfavorable. It may be that the enemies who desire to destroy your independence and your Republic represent the strongest force that the earth has ever seen; that they have through craft and force, taken possession of all the fortresses and arsenals of the homeland; that all its armies are scattered and the country actually and completely occupied.
    Assuming, in order to look still darker possibilities in the face, that those who hold the power of Government within the country have fallen into error, that they are fools or traitors, yes, even that these leading persons may identify their personal interests with the enemy’s political goals, it might happen that the nation came into complete privation, into the most extreme distress; that it found itself in a condition of ruin and complete exhaustion.

    Even under those circumstances, O Turkish child of future generations, it is your duty to save the independence of the Turkish Republic.

    The strength that you will need for this is mighty in the noble blood which flows in your veins.

    Mustafa Kemal Atatürk

    From“The Great Speech”
    20 October 1927

    https://yunus.hacettepe.edu.tr/~sadi/dizeler/hitabe2.html

    VATAN HAİNİ

    “Nâzım Hikmet vatan hainliğine devam ediyor hâlâ.
    Amerikan emperyalizminin yarı sömürgesiyiz,” dedi Hikmet.
    “Nâzım Hikmet vatan hainliğine devam ediyor hâlâ.”
    Bir Ankara gazetesinde çıktı bunlar, üç sütun üstüne, kapkara haykıran puntolarla,
    bır Ankara gazetesinde, fotoğrafı yanında Amiral Vilyamson’un
    66 santimetre karede gülüyor, ağzı kulaklarında, Amerikan amirali
    Amerika, bütçemize 120 milyon lira hibe etti, 120 milyon lira.
    “Amerikan emperyalizminin yari sömurgesiyiz, dedi Hikmet
    Nâzım Hikmet vatan hainliğine devam ediyor hâlâ.”

    Evet, vatan hainliğine, siz vatanperverseniz, siz yurtseverseniz, ben yurt
    hainiyim, ben vatan hainiyim.
    Vatan ciftliklerinizse,
    kasalarınızın ve çek defterlerinizin içindekilerse vatan,
    vatan, şose boylarında gebermekse açlıktan,
    vatan, soğukta it gibi titremek ve sıtmadan kıvranmaksa yazın,
    fabrikalrınızda al kanımızı içmekse vatan,
    vatan tırnaklarıysa ağalarınızın,
    vatan, mızraklı ilmühalse, vatan, polis copuysa,
    ödeneklerinizse, maaşlarınızsa vatan,
    vatan, Amerikan üsleri, Amerikan bombası, American donanması topuysa,
    vatan, kurtulmamaksa kokmuş karanlığımızdan,
    ben vatan hainiyim.
    Yazın üç sütun üstüne kapkara haykıran puntolarla:
    Nâzım Hikmet vatan hainliğine devam ediyor hâlâ.

    Nazım Hikmet

    28 Temmuz 1962

    https://nazimhikmet.fisek.com.tr/siir/vatanhaini.htm

    ATATÜRK’ÜN GENCLİĞE HİTABESİ

    Ey Türk gençliği! Birinci vazifen, Türk istiklâlini, Türk Cumhuriyet’ini, ilelebet, muhafaza ve müdafaa etmektir.

    Mevcudiyetinin ve istikbalinin yegâne temeli budur.
    Bu temel, senin, en kıymetli hazinendir.
    İstikbalde dahi, seni bu hazineden mahrum etmek isteyecek, dahilî ve haricî bedhahların olacaktır. Bir gün, istiklâl ve cumhuriyeti müdafaa mecburiyetine düşersen, vazifeye atılmak için, içinde bulunacağın vaziyetln imkân ve şeraitini düşünmeyeceksin!
    Bu imkân ve şerait, çok nâmüsait bir mahiyette tezahür edebilir.
    İstiklâl ve cumhuriyetine kastedecek düşmanlar, bütün dünyada emsali görülmemiş bir galibiyetin mümessili olabilirler. Cebren ve hile ile aziz vatanın, bütün kaleleri zaptedilmiş, bütün tersanelerine girilmiş, bütün orduları dagıtılmış ve memleketin her köşesi bilfiil işgal edilmiş olabilir. Bütün bu şeraitten daha elîm ve daha vahim olmak üzere, memleketin dahilinde, iktidara sahip olanlar gaflet ve dalâlet ve hattâ hiyanet içinde bulunabilirler.
    Hatta bu iktidar sahipleri şahsî menfaatlerini, müstevlilerin siyasî emelleriyle tevhit edebilirler. Millet, fakr ü zaruret içinde harap ve bîtap düşmüş olabilir.

    Ey Türk istikbalinin evlâdı! İşte, bu ahval ve şerait içinde dahi, vazifen; Türk istiklâl ve cumhuriyetini kurtarmaktır!

    Muhtaç olduğun kudret, damarlarındaki asil kanda, mevcuttur!

    Mustafa Kemal Atatürk
    “Nutuk”
    20 Ekim 1927

    2 comments:

    Ergun Kirlikovali said…
    Dear Cem Ryan,

    I appreciated and enjoyed your commentary and would like to publish it in my columns at www.turkla.com and www.turkishjournal.com in its entirety, if you give me your permission.

    Keep up the good work!

    Ergun KIRLIKOVALI: Ergun@turkla.com.
    12-24-2008

    Anonymous said…
    Turks Should Condemn American Indian Genocide, indeed but, if Armenian were as ‘lucky’ as native Americans, they would have Casinos and ‘tribal’ lands in Turkey. Armenian Genocide should never be forgotten and you’ll be rotting in hell for being Turkish government’s thug.

  • Archbishop joins criticism of BBC refusal to screen Gaza appeal

    Archbishop joins criticism of BBC refusal to screen Gaza appeal

    Corporation receives 11,000 complaints and 50 MPs plan to back motion calling on BBC to change its mind over aid film

    Protesters demonstrate outside the BBC's Broadcasting House. Photograph: Andy Rain/EPA

    The Archbishop of Canterbury today added to criticism of the BBC over its refusal to broadcast a charity appeal for aid to Gaza.

    He spoke as it emerged the BBC had received some 11,000 complaints and more than 50 MPs planned to back a parliamentary motion urging the corporation to reverse its decision not to broadcast tomorrow’s appeal by the Disasters Emergency Committee (DEC).

     

    The early day motion to be tabled tomorrow by Labour’s Richard Burden has received the support of 51 MPs from across the Commons; ministers and some senior BBC staff have also called for the BBC to change its mind. The corporation today admitted it had received “approximately” 1,000 telephone complaints about the decision and a further 10,000 by email.

     

    Meanwhile, adding his voice to the calls for a U-turn while speaking after a church service in Cambridge, the Right Rev Rowan Williams said: “My feeling is that the BBC should broadcast an appeal.”

     

    But despite the increasing pressure, a BBC spokesman today said the situation remained unchanged.

     

    Mark Thompson, the BBC director general, has been left isolated as ITV and Channel 4 agreed to air the plea for aid.

     

    The BBC has decided that broadcasting the appeal might be seen as evidence of bias on a highly sensitive political issue.

     

    The culture secretary, Andy Burnham, said it was right that broadcasters made their own decisions, adding that the BBC faced a difficult choice because of the way it is funded.

    The communities secretary, Hazel Blears, said she hoped the BBC would “urgently review its decision”, and the Scottish first minister, Alex Salmond, said the corporation had made the “wrong decision”.

    Yesterday, the Archbishop of York, the John Sentamu, accused the broadcaster of “taking sides” and said: “This is not a row about impartiality, but rather about humanity.

     

    “This situation is akin to that of British military hospitals who treat prisoners of war as a result of their duty under the Geneva convention,” he added.

    “They do so because they identify need rather than cause. This is not an appeal by Hamas asking for arms, but by the Disasters Emergency Committee asking for relief.

    “By declining their request, the BBC has already taken sides and forsaken impartiality.”

    Thompson received backing from the BBC Trust’s chairman, Sir Michael Lyons. He said he was “concerned” about the tone of some politicians’ comments on the issue, which he said came close to “undue interference” in the BBC’s editorial independence.

    The BBC’s unrepentant stance has stirred up rebellion in the ranks of it own reporters and editors. One senior BBC news presenter told the Observer: “I’ve been talking to colleagues, and everyone here is absolutely seething about this.

    “The notion that the decision to ban the appeal will seem impartial to the public at large is quite absurd.

    “Most of us feel that the BBC’s defence of its position is pathetic, and there’s a feeling of real anger, made worse by the fact that, contractually, we are unable to speak out.”

    Jon Snow, the journalist who presents Channel 4 news, said the BBC should have been prepared to accept the judgment of the aid experts of the DEC.

    “It is a ludicrous decision,” he said. “That is what public service broadcasting is for. I think it was a decision founded on complete ignorance and I am absolutely amazed they have stuck to it.”

    Snow said he suspected a BBC bureaucrat had “panicked” and urged Thompson to put the situation right.

    Martin Bell, the former BBC foreign correspondent, said the corporation should admit it had made a mistake and claimed “a culture of timidity had crept” in.

    “I am completely appalled,” he said. “It is a grave humanitarian crisis and the people who are suffering are children. They have been caught out on this question of balance.”

    But Greg Dyke, Thompson’s predecessor as director general, said the issue had put the BBC in a “no win situation”.

    “Outside of Iraq, the single biggest issue that caused complaints was the coverage of Israel,” he added. “I can understand why the BBC has taken this decision, because on a subject as sensitive as the Middle East it is absolutely essential that the audience cannot see any evidence at all of a bias.”

    The BBC also faces demands for an explanation from within the ­Commons international development select committee.

    Andrew Mitchell, the shadow international development secretary, said: “We believe that they should allow the broadcast to proceed so that the British public, who have proved themselves so generous during recent emergencies in the Congo and Burma, can make their own judgment on the validity of the appeal.”

    The satellite broadcaster Sky said it was “considering” broadcasting the appeal.

    A BBC spokesman said: “We do accept that people are strongly guided in their view on this by the humanitarian emergency.

    “We are highlighting the situation in Gaza in every news bulletin, and that is one of the reasons the issue is so high on the agenda.”

    Guardian

  • Israel, Turkey and the politics of genocide

    Israel, Turkey and the politics of genocide

    Globe and Mail Update

    President Obama — I love saying those words — has momentarily united the world. Almost. Among the exceptions, though barely noticed by the mainstream media, is the estrangement of Turkey and Israel, previously staunch allies in the turbulent Middle East.

    At first blush, this alliance may seem counterintuitive, but in fact it makes good strategic sense for both countries. Israel gets a warm working relationship with one of the largest Muslim countries in the world, while enriching Israel’s all-important industrial-military complex. Less than two months ago, for instance, came the news of a deal worth $140-million to Israeli firms to upgrade Turkey’s air force. In the hard-boiled, realpolitik terms that determine Israel’s strategies, it’s a no-brainer. Almost.

    In return, Turkey gets military, economic and diplomatic benefits. But it also gets something less tangible, something that matters deeply for reasons hard for outsiders to grasp. As part of the Faustian bargain between the two countries, a succession of Israeli governments of all stripes has adamantly refused to recognize that in 1915 the Turkish government was responsible for launching a genocide against its Armenian minority. Some 2.5-million Armenian women, men and children were successfully killed.

    I should make clear that this Israeli position is not held casually. On the contrary. Over the years Israelis, with a few notably courageous exceptions, have actually worked against attempts to safeguard the memory of the Armenian genocide. (The bible on this issue is the excellent book by an Israeli, Yair Auron, called The Banality of Denial: Israel and the Armenian Genocide, 2003.)

    For many, this may well be a pretty esoteric sidebar to the world’s many crises. But readers need to understand that every Turkish government for almost a century now has passionately denied that a genocide took place at all. Yet the vast majority of disinterested scholars of genocide have publicly affirmed that it was indeed a genocide, one of the small number in the 20th century (with the Holocaust and Rwanda) that have incontestably met the definition set down in the UN’s 1948 Genocide Convention.

    For Armenians in the Western world, even after 94 years, nothing is more important than persuading other governments to recognize this. For Turkish authorities, even after 94 years, nothing is more important than preventing that recognition. In that pursuit, Israel has been perhaps Turkey’s most powerful ally. After all, if the keepers of the memory of the Holocaust don’t acknowledge 1915, why should anyone else?

    But the Israeli-Turkish bargain goes well beyond Israel. Not only is Israel, of all the unlikely states in the world, a genocide denier, but also many established Jewish organizations in other countries, especially the United States, have followed suit. In the United States, those who argue that denying the Holocaust is psychologically tantamount to a second holocaust have taken the lead in pressuring presidents and Congress against recognizing the reality of 1915. Resolutions calling for recognition are regularly pushed by American-Armenians and their many supporters. Jewish groups regularly lead the opposition. Some believe that members of these groups in fact understand perfectly well the rights and wrongs of the case. But a mindset that backs any and all Israeli government initiatives trumps all else. And successfully. Repeated attempts in Congress to pass this resolution has failed, even though the list of nations that now recognizes the Armenian genocide has grown steadily and, thanks to Stephen Harper, now includes Canada.

    It is this rather unseemly, if not unholy, Israeli-Turkish deal that has been among the many victims of the latest Israeli attack on Gaza. Whether the Israelis anticipated it or not, the Turkish government turned against its erstwhile ally with a vengeance, pulling few punches. Turkish Prime Minister Recep Erdogan accused Israel of “perpetrating inhuman actions which would bring it to self-destruction. Allah will sooner or later punish those who transgress the rights of innocents.” Mr. Erdogan described Israel’s attack on Gaza as “savagery” and a “crime against humanity.”

    Israel formally described this language as “unacceptable” and certain Israeli media outlets have raised the stakes. The Jerusalem Post editorialized that given Turkey’s record of killing tens of thousands of Kurds in northern Iraq, “we’re not convinced that Turkey has earned the right to lecture Israelis about human rights.” Israel’s deputy foreign minister was even more pointed: “Erdogan says that genocide is taking place in Gaza. We [Israel] will then recognize the Armenian-related events as genocide.” Suddenly, genocide turns into a geopolitical pawn.

    It isn’t easy to choose a winner in the cynicism stakes here. Here’s what one Turkish columnist, Barcin Yinanc, shrewdly wrote: “When April comes, I can imagine the [Turkish] government instructing its Ambassador to Israel to mobilize the Israeli government to stop the Armenian initiatives in the U.S. Congress. I can hear some Israelis telling the Turkish Ambassador to go talk to Hamas to lobby the Congress.”

    I’m guessing some readers work on the naïve assumption that an event is deemed genocidal based on the facts of the case. Silly you. In the real world, you call it genocide if it bolsters your interests. If it doesn’t, it’s not. It’s actually the same story as with preventing genocide.

    What happens now? Candidate Obama twice pledged that he would recognize the Armenian claim of genocide. But so had candidate George W. Bush eight years earlier, until he was elected and faced the Turkish/Jewish lobby. Armenian-Americans and their backers are already pressing Mr. Obama to fulfill his pledge. With the Turkish-Israeli alliance deeply strained, the position of the leading Jewish organizations is very much in question this time. Whatever the outcome, be sure that politics, not genocide, will be the decisive factor.

    Gerald Caplan, author of The Betrayal of Africa, writes frequently on issues related to genocide.

  • Israel-Turkey diplomatic spat worsens, despite end of Gaza fighting

    Israel-Turkey diplomatic spat worsens, despite end of Gaza fighting

     

     By Barak Ravid

     

    HAARETZ.COM


    The crisis in relations between Israel and Turkey, which began when the Gaza operation began three weeks ago, is getting worse. A political source in Jerusalem said that the head of the political-security bureau at the Defense Ministry, Amos Gilad, refused to meet with Ahmet Davutoglu, the senior foreign policy adviser to Turkey’s Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, while the two were in Cairo last week.

    Last Thursday, Amos Gilad visited Cairo for talks with Egypt’s Omar Suleiman on a cease-fire agreement. At the time, Davutoglu, who had served as a mediator in Israel’s talks with Syria in Istanbul, was in touch with Hamas politburo chief Khaled Meshal, who is based on Damascus.

     

     

    At the start of the Gaza operation, Erdogan instructed Davutoglu to serve as a conduit between Hamas and the West and also try to involve Turkey in the cease-fire negotiations. Egypt expressed its reservations at Turkey’s involvement and refused even to allow Davutoglu to sit in on talks with senior Hamas officials in Cairo.

    But it turns out that not only Egypt refused to have exchanges with Davutoglu. So did Israel. A political source in Jerusalem said that on Thursday, when Gilad was in Cairo, the Turkish ambassador to Egypt called his Israeli counterpart, Shalom Cohen. The Turkish ambassador asked for a meeting between Davutoglu and Gilad to deliver a message from Hamas. The political source said the Turks “asked for even a five-minute meeting” and that the ambassador called back several times.

    The Turkish request was relayed to Gilad by the Israeli ambassador, but he refused to meet with Davutoglu. The Israeli political source said the reason for the refusal was the deterioration in relations between Jerusalem and Ankara, stemming from the unprecedented verbal attacks by Erdogan on Israel.

    The source added that another reason was the unwillingness to allow the Turks to intervene in the cease-fire talks and the wish to rely solely on the Egyptian channel.

    Erdogan’s attacks on Israel in recent weeks have been particularly fierce, with Prime Minister Ehud Olmert specifically targeted for what the Turkish leader called “lying to him and acting behind his back.”

    The words of the leader of the AKP, Turkey’s ruling Islamist party, were a source of anger among Turkey’s military, where there is concern that the rift would undermine the strategic ties with Israel.

  • CONF./CFP- The Turkic World, the Caucasus, and Iran, July 10-12, Yerevan

    CONF./CFP- The Turkic World, the Caucasus, and Iran, July 10-12, Yerevan

    International Conference
    The Turkic World, the Caucasus, and Iran: Civilisational Crossroads of
    Interactions
    July 10-12, 2009
    Yerevan, Armenia
    http://www.armacad.org/civilizationica

    The International Journal Iran and the Caucasus
    (; Brill: Leiden-Boston), the Department of
    Iranian Studies at Yerevan State University, the Makhtumquli Feraqi
    Centre for Turkic Studies at ARYA International University (Yerevan),
    the Association for the Study of Persianate Societies (Armenian
    Branch), in collaboration with the International Society for the Study
    of Iran and the Caucasus (ISSIC;
    http://www.armacad.org/iranocaucasica), Caucasian Centre for Iranian
    Studies (Yerevan), the Armenian-Turkmen Cooperation Centre “Partev”
    (Yerevan), and the Armenian Association for Academic Partnership and
    Support – ARMACAD (http://www.armacad.org/; Yerevan) are organising an
    international conference entitled “The Turkic World, the Caucasus, and
    Iran: Civilisational Crossroads of Interactions”.

    The Conference will be held on July 10-12, 2009.
    Venue: ARYA International University, Yerevan, Armenia.

    The region of civilisational interactions from Central Asia to Eastern
    Europe and from Southern Russia to Iran has been one of the focal
    geographical points in world history. The main cultural, political and
    civilisational players in this domain have been the Iranian and Turkic
    peoples, while the Caucasus and the Transcaucasian region with their
    cultural, ethnographical and linguistic uniqueness have served as a
    connecting link and an arena for wars and peaceful cohabitation.
    Though the main stress of the conference will be on cultures,
    histories (including archaeology, etc.), languages and the literatures
    of this vast area, presentations on modern political and regional
    issues, as well as the human ecology topics are also welcomed. The
    conference seeks to emphasise links between the Turkic world, the
    Caucasus, and Iran.

    Working languages – English and Russian.

    Abstracts (not to exceed 300 words) are to be submitted via the web
    form (http://www.armacad.org/civilizationica/abstracts.php) by
    February 20, 2009.  A brief biography, including contact details, is
    also to be included.

    Once your materials have been submitted, a confirmation letter will be
    returned. If you do not receive a confirmation e-mail within 7 days,
    then we have not received your materials. Only in this case, please
    contact: khachik.gevorgyan@yahoo.co.uk

    A notification of acceptance will be sent by March 30, 2009.

    All whose abstracts are accepted for presentation at the conference
    have to send to the Conference Organising Committee 10 Euros before
    June 10 in order to ensure their participation. This amount of money
    will be reduced from the participation fee.

    Participation Fee:

    The conference participation fee is 70 Euros and a reduced rate of 35
    Euros for postgraduate students. Participants from the Caucasus and
    Central Asia will pay 35 Euros.

    For further information do not hesitate to contact:

    Dr. Khachik Gevorgyan,
    Secretary of the Organising Committee
    khachik.gevorgyan@yahoo.co.uk

    Makhtumquli Feraqi Centre for Turkic Studies,
    Arya International University
    Shahamiryanneri street, 18/2
    Yerevan
    Armenia
    Tel: +374 (10) 44-35-85
    Fax: +374 (10) 44-23-07
    www.arya.am
    Email: arya@arminco.com

    International Organising Committee

    Prof. Dr. Garnik Asatrian (Yerevan)
    Prof. Dr. Uwe Blaesing (Leiden)
    Prof. Dr. Ralph Kautz (Vienna)
    Prof. Dr. Vladimir Livshits (Saint Petersburg)
    Prof. Dr. Levon Zekiyan (Venice)
    Prof. Dr. Said Amir Arjomand (New York)
    Prof. Dr. Murtazali Gadjiev (Makhachkala)
    Prof. Dr. Rovshan Rahmoni (Dushanbe)
    Prof. Dr. George Sanikidze (Tbilisi)
    Dr. Gulnara Aitpaeva (Bishkek)
    Dr. Behrooz Bakhtiari (Tehran)
    Dr. Habib Borjian (New York)
    Dr. Babak Rezvani (Amsterdam)
    Dr. Mher Gyulumian (Yerevan)
    Dr. Mahmoud Joneydi Ja’fari (Tehran)
    Dr. Seyyed Said Jalali (Tehran)
    Dr. Kakajan Janbekov (Ashgabat)
    Dr. Filiz Kiral (Istanbul)
    Dr. Irina Natchkebia (Tbilisi)
    Dr. Vahram Petrosian (Yerevan)
    Dr. Tamerlan Salbiev (Vladikavkaz)
    Dr. Alexander Safarian (Yerevan)

  • Chief of Poland’s General Staff: “Nagorno Karabakh conflict can be settled only in the framework of the territorial integrity of Azerbaijan”

    Chief of Poland’s General Staff: “Nagorno Karabakh conflict can be settled only in the framework of the territorial integrity of Azerbaijan”

    On January 23 Azerbaijani Defense Minister Safar Abiyev received chief of the General Staff of the armed forces of Poland, general Franchishek Gagor, said the press service for the Defense Ministry of Azerbaijan.

    As is reported, the meeting was attended by Poland’s ambassador to Azerbaijan Kshishtof Krayevski. (more…)