Category: Regions

  • Turkey Is the Model for Arab Spring Nations

    Turkey Is the Model for Arab Spring Nations

    Aki Peritz is the senior policy adviser for national security at Third Way and author of Find, Fix, Finish: Inside the Counterterrorism Campaigns that Killed bin Laden and Devastated Al Qaeda.

    The political advances Islamist parties have been making across the Middle East have caused a lot of uneasiness in Washington. From Egypt to Tunisia, religiously conservative Islamist politicians are leading major countries, complicating an already complex narrative for U.S. policymakers. But is this worry justified?

    Time will tell, but at least we have one decent example of an Islamist party taking power and not crashing the government or the economy: Turkey.

    The “Turkey Model”—how moderate Islamist parties could govern Western-oriented, Muslim-majority countries—was on everyone’s lips during the Arab Spring as the new Middle Eastern paradigm. But the Turkish model will only succeed if these countries can build secular states with strong governmental institutions, and only if the U.S. backs these efforts, as it has strongly supported Turkey over the past 70 years.

    [See a collection of political cartoons on the Middle East.]

    From the ashes of the Ottoman Empire, Turkey has been the beneficiary of almost a century of secular rule. Generations of Turks have lived in a modern secular state, so much so that women in headscarves even today cannot enter government buildings. The Turkish military is the primary enforcer of secularism, forcing out one government in 1997 the generals deemed too religious. While ugly, it cemented the notion that there are limits to how far religion can advance in the public marketplace.

    As a secular-oriented nation, Turkey is bound to the West in many ways. The shopworn phrase that Turkey sits at the crossroads of Europe and Asia is not just a throwaway line for the country’s tourism industry. As a NATO member since 1952, Turkey is integral to the American-European military alliance, even if the European Union continues to give Ankara the cold shoulder. And NATO needs Turkey, for the country has the second largest military in the alliance.

    Here at home, U.S. policymakers since World War II have seen Turkish stability as a core national security imperative. After all, the 1947 Truman Doctrine was founded specifically to assist Turkey against communist aggression. President Truman provided aid to the “freedom-loving” people of Turkey, for it was “necessary for the maintenance of its national integrity.”

    [See a collection of political cartoons on defense spending.]

    Even now, Turkey is critical, and the US is deeply invested in the country. Turkey hosts U.S. troops at Incirlik Air Base and Izmir Air Station. 400 U.S. troops man Patriot missile batteries in the south, and the nation hosts an X-band radar system at Kürecik Air Base that keeps an eye on its irascible neighbor, Iran. Turkey is also critical to solving – or at least containing – the civil war in Syria.

    Despite some rocky stretches, such as when the Turkish parliament denied the U.S. an invasion route in the run-up to the Iraq War, the U.S. assiduously cultivates Turkey because it remains in Washington’s best interests to do so. As Kim Ghattas noted in “The Secretary,” Secretary of State Clinton saw her Turkish counterpart as “one of her more consequential counterparts even if she didn’t always agree with him. Developing a relationship with [Foreign Minister] Davutoglu was also a way of keeping Turkey close, in the orbit of the West.”

    And this rapport continues to pay dividends: During his latest trip to the region, President Obama brokered a rapprochement between Turkey and Israel renewing the two countries’ strategic partnership.

    This is all accomplished with religious conservatives dominating parliament. Despite some misgivings, Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and his Islamist Justice and Development Party (AKP) have been in power for a decade, and so far they’ve been successful in guiding the economy, growing it at almost 6 percent a year.

    [See a collection of political cartoons on the European debt crisis.]

    Still, all is not all rosy in Anatolia. In 2010, Turkey voted against UN sanctions against Iran. A recent scandal named Ergenekon has placed numerous top military men behind bars. Turkey remains on edge with its Kurdish population. And simmering historic tensions with Greece threaten to erupt over Cyprus.

    From a larger perspective, Turkey shows that religious parties and democratic rule are not inherently incompatible. However, a country requires a foundation of stable, credible civilian institutions and a history of citizen-state interactions for this to work—combined with a close and continuing interest from the world’s remaining superpower. This successful recipe could be replicated, over time, across the Middle East.

    When the master Ottoman architect Mimar Sinan designed the magnificent Süleymaniye Mosque in the 1550s, he let the structure’s foundations settle for three years in the earthquake-prone city before beginning the mosque’s actual construction. If the nations of the Middle East had time and patience to let their political foundations become strong and independent enough to withstand periodic shakeups, they too can be like Turkey.

    It remains to be seen whether the leaders guiding the new Middle East have this perseverance—and whether America has the attention span to follow through on our side of the bargain.

    via Turkey Is the Model for Arab Spring Nations – World Report (usnews.com).

  • A Muslim’s Prayer for the Boston Marathon

    A Muslim’s Prayer for the Boston Marathon

    By Arsalan Iftikhar

    First of all, it really does not matter who was behind the multiple explosions at the Boston Marathon. This is because my thoughts and prayers are solely with the victims and the families of those people who were affected by this horrific attack in Boston.

    Although to be completely honest, when the news first started breaking in media outlets around the country about the explosions, I joined several million Muslim people in America thinking exactly the same thing:

    “Oh God…Please don’t let it be a Muslim…”

    As a Muslim, as an American and as a member of the human race, my heart continues to break as we continue to learn more about the multiple explosions near the finish line of the 2013 Boston Marathon, which has killed at least 3 people so far and injured over 141 people during the late afternoon hours.

    But then again, I also remember feeling the same way during the breaking news of the December 2012 Sandy Hook school shooting in Newtown, Connecticut as well:

    “Oh God…Please don’t let it be a Muslim…”

    Also in July 2012, as we began to hear the stories of the Dark Knight mass shooting massacre inside of an Aurora, Colorado movie theater where 12 innocent people were murdered with over 60 people injured, I also remember thinking the same thing:

    “Oh God…Please don’t let it be a Muslim…”

    Even though it was two white dudes (Adam Lanza and James Holmes) who were ultimately responsible for these two acts of terrorism (yes, even white dudes can commit terrorism), the majority of American Muslims always seems anxiety-ridden that any future act of terror will be committed by a brown dude with a Muslim-sounding name and lead to another vicious chapter of Islamophobia and anti-Muslim hate crimes around the country.

    As recently noted by Max Fisher in The Washington Post: “People in the Muslim world are often keenly aware of the American reflex to associate bombing attacks on U.S. citizens with Muslim extremists. A certain routine has emerged, in which some Muslims seem compelled to make clear that they denounce the violence and consider it a violation of Islam — often even before the attacker’s religion is determined.”

    But based on facts and reality, we Muslims are not being paranoid. For example, a FOX News contributor named Erik Rush wasted no time by going on Twitter right after the Boston Marathon explosions to state that Muslims “are evil…Let’s kill them all.”

    Please tell us how you really feel, Mr. Rush.

    If the perpetrators end up being Muslims, then this collective anxiety will indeed increase again like we have seen in recent American history during the last decade.

    No matter the religion or race of the perpetrators involved in this heinous attack, people of all faiths should unequivocally condemn these acts and our American neighbors should know that the thoughts and prayers of this American Muslim and millions of other Muslims around the world are with the people of Boston tonight.

    Arsalan Iftikhar is an international human rights lawyer, founder of TheMuslimGuy.com, author of Islamic Pacifism: Global Muslims in the Post-Osama Era and senior editor for The Islamic Monthly magazine in Washington.

    via “A Muslim’s Prayer for the Boston Marathon” by Arsalan Iftikhar | Arsalan Iftikhar | The Muslim Guy | Editor | Human Rights Lawyer | TheMuslimGuy.

  • Armenian NGOs against the moving of UN regional offices to Istanbul

    Armenian NGOs against the moving of UN regional offices to Istanbul

    Anna Nazaryan

    “Radiolur”

    Turkey is trying to affect the UN decisions and spares no financial means to transfer the UN regional offices to Istanbul. A number of Armenian NGOs assess this as a political step and are concerned with the initiative, which is a violation of the fundamental principles and objectives of the UN, particularly some points of the UN Charter.

    The Armenian NGOs have addressed a letter to UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon. A few days ago they applied to the visiting Deputy Prime Minister of Slovenia, urging the EU to give assessment to the issue.

    Another letter has been prepared in cooperation with representatives of the National Assembly and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, member of the Public Council, President of the Association for Stable Human Development Karine Danielyan told reporters today. Everything should be done to prevent the transfer of UN regional offices to Istanbul.

    Head of the  Center for the Development of Civil Society Svetlana Aslanyan added that other countries also stand against the initiative.

    Former Human Rights Defender Larisa Alaverdyan said the intention to move UN regional offices to Istanbul pursues political purposes, although it is said that the initiative aims to eliminate the technical obstacles and settle the financial issues.

    Turkey is rather generous unlike many other UN member states, and most probably, this has served as a ground for the move of UN offices to Istanbul, Larisa Alaverdyan said.

    Turkey will thus have an opportunity to influence UN decisions, which does not meet Armenia’s interests, the ex-Ombudswoman said.

    How can a country that has committed genocide try to convince the world of its humanism? Ethnographer Hranush Kharatyan believes the world should know that the Ottoman Empire is a ‘genocidal country.’

    Greece has officially declared it stands against the intention to move US regional offices to Istanbul. It’s time for Armenia to do the same, she said.

    via Armenian NGOs against the moving of UN regional offices to Istanbul | Public Radio of Armenia.

  • Sentencing of Turkish pianist marks new low

    Sentencing of Turkish pianist marks new low

    MEP: Sentencing of Turkish pianist marks new low

    16.04.2013Posted in: Foreign Affairs, human rights, Policy Map, Timeline, Top Stories, Turkey

    Schaake1Dutch Member of European Parliament Marietje Schaake (D66/ALDE) is concerned about the sentencing of the well known Turkish pianist Fazil Say. A Turkish court sentenced Say to a suspended 10 months in jail for posting tweets in which he criticised religion and declared himself an atheist. Schaake is a long time critic of the on going erosion of the rule of law in Turkey that tramples fundamental rights. “This is only the last example in a series of sentences following criticism on religion or politics, while the statements are legal according to universal human rights and European law. The growing number of convictions leads to fear among journalists and artists and spurs self-censorship. This is a major problem and hampers the democratic reforms that Turkey so badly needs”, Schaake says.

    Statement
    The European Commission released a statement today saying Turkey has to respect freedom of expression, as enshrined in the European Convention on Human Rights, to which Turkey is a party. Schaake: “The deterioration of freedom of expression is a growing problem. As the government is becoming more authoritarian, and the Turkish judiciary threatens to lose its independence. The EU should draw its consequences if the Turkish government does not show though actions it is committed to substantial democratic and judicial reforms.”

    Accession process
    Schaake wants the EU to put freedom of expression at the heart of Turkey’s accession process. “The fact that Turkey is an important ally for the EU in facing shared challenges in the Middle East should not overshadow Turkey’s domestic human rights problems. When EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton recently visited Turkey she did not address these very real problems during the official press conference while these issues should be directly addressed with the Turkish government”, Schaake adds.

    Progress report
    This week the European Parliament will vote on its annual report assessing Turkey’s progress towards EU accession. Through several amendments Schaake pleads for respect for freedoms such as freedom of expression and digital freedoms as well as the rule of law in Turkey.

    ——

    For more information:

    Marietje Schaake 0031 6 3037 7921

    or her press officer Anna Sophia Posthumus 0032 484 201 518

  • The Daily Worry: How I Learned to Live with Bombs in Turkey and Israel

    The Daily Worry: How I Learned to Live with Bombs in Turkey and Israel

    URIEL SINAI / GETTY IMAGESEmergency services work the scene of an explosion on a bus in Tel Aviv on Nov. 21, 2012

    It is unsettling the first time the doors of a shopping mall glide open to reveal a magnetometer, an x-ray machine, and a person wearing a holster. Less so the second time, and the point quickly arrives when it’s no more remarkable than finding a maze of chrome posts and retractable belts standing between an airport’s ticket counters and the boarding gates.  Put your phone, keys and coins in the tray and get on with it.

    I first acclimated to the diffuse background threat of urban bombing in the summer of 2002, when I moved to Istanbul, where small explosives had become the weapon of choice for assorted separatists and radicals in the 1990s.  Turkey was a fine preparatory course for life in Israel, which on Tuesday celebrated 65 years of existence, not one passed in peace. Security is a way of life here — most famously at the airport, where the solemn questioning and extraordinary inspections are almost a feature of a tourist visit, one that visitors often relate afterward with the specificity of a lion sighting after a  drive through a game park.  But the preoccupation is scarcely less present in Israel’s cities, where a decade ago, storefronts would from time to time disintegrate in the same burst of ignition and billowing dust that rose over Boylston Street on Monday afternoon.

    There are different ways to go afterward.  The British “Keep Calm and Carry On,” as the sign says, the London subway bombings of July 2005 stiffening the upper lip that remained in place from the Blitz of World War II through the IRA attacks of a quarter century ago. London barely missed a beat. Jewish Israelis take some pride in cultivating the same attitude.  During the Second Intifadeh, which at its height in March 2002 meant something exploding somewhere inside Israel almost every day,  then-prime minister Ariel Sharon asked the social psychologist Reuven Gal to measure how the Israeli public was bearing up under the stress.  Politicians love anecdotes, but Gal went about it methodically, gathering metrics via objective indicators, such as movie attendance.  What he found was a striking resilience.  After an attack, attendance dipped, but always came back.

    Still, the memory of explosions changes things.  A shadow appears, like a penumbra, around a café that someone mentions in passing was once hit by a suicide bomber; photos of the carnage are available online for those who did not see them at the time. City buses hove into view bearing a specific menace, the entirely reasonable apprehension that accumulates watching untold hours of news footage panning the blackened skeleton belonging to the Egged or Dan lines. A No. 142 bus went up in Tel Aviv, in November, the first in years. The bomb was small, had been left under a seat, and no one was killed. But shock waves really are invisible, and can carry far. On an intercity bus approaching the city the day of that attack, cell phones rang with the news, and a woman, not saying a word but only hearing, burst into tears. Glenn Beck was in Jerusalem a year earlier, doing his shtick as featured guest at a Knesset committee. Beck said the first time he came to Israel it was after a long talk with his wife about risk.  The assumption, he said, was that he’d be “roasting my dinner over the flames of a burning bus.” Nobody laughed.  I saw one tight smile.

    The fact is it’s quite safe here, and feels so.  Part of it is the visible precautions, the magnetometers at the malls (here too, of course), the doormen with side arms.  At some point Jerusalem required restaurants to post a security guard at the front entrance; they’re still there, though at some of the glossier addresses they now wear short black skirts.  It doesn’t matter terribly because of the other, larger part of security in Israel, the part that’s less visible and quite possibly not suitable for export.

    That would be “internal security,” or “Shin Bet,” also known as “Shabak,” the Hebrew acronym for Israel Security Agency.  The agency’s thousands of secret police keep watch on the Jewish State, monitoring suspicious behavior, monitoring cell phones and coercing Palestinians. The work carries moral risks mulled absorbingly in the documentary The Gatekeepers, made up entirely of interviews with men who used to run the organization; it was nominated for an Academy Award.  But Shin Bet’s work is made infinitely easier by the fact that the agency is protecting something discreet. The Jewish State may have no shortage of enemies, but in a fight at bottom over land and ethnic identity,  the process of  screening  who to watch for trouble starts with an almost binary equation: Us and Them.  In a nation of immigrants, say, the United States, divisions will never be so clear, leaving aside the crucial question of civil liberties.

    Which leaves what in Turkey at least we called “hard security.”  Inside the mall, beyond the x-ray machine and the man in blue, was a food court, a huge one. But no rubbish bins.  Men and women with carts circulated among the tables, busing trash and collecting trays. It may have been an employment scheme, but it also obviated the need for a place where a bomb could be deposited and walked away from without raising any suspicion.

    Outside, when I finally did find a place to drop trash, it was a plastic bag hanging from an iron ring – clear, so you could see what was in there. Looking askance at a trash can turns out to be like flinching at the approach of a city bus: Odd, and not a little insidious. But here we all are.

    b74ab0d3e6c7bca9513f7534bf977be9?s=74&d=404&r=G

    Karl Vick @karl_vick

    Karl Vick has been TIME’s Jerusalem bureau chief since 2010, covering Israel,the Palestine territories and nearby sovereignties. He worked 16 years at the Washington Post in Nairobi, Istanbul, Baghdad, Los Angeles and Rockville, MD.

    Read more: http://world.time.com/2013/04/16/life-during-wartime/#ixzz2QgytR3Ap

  • Al-Khatib against calls for “Islamic state”

    Al-Khatib against calls for “Islamic state”

    Syria is a country where moderate Islam dominates, said Khatib, President of Syrian National Coalition.

    resimISTANBUL — President of the Syrian National Coalition for Opposition and Revolutionary Forces, Ahmad Moaz al-Khatib said that Syria was a country where moderate Islam dominated.

    A conference on “Islam and Just Transition in Syria” began in Istanbul so the Syrian Muslim scholars could put forward their approaches to the transitional process in Syria.

    A high number of Syrian Muslim scholars and important names of the Syrian opposition attended the conference.

    Speaking at the inauguration of the conference, al-Khatib underlined that in order for Islam’s real message to be understood, a revolution must take place in human’s understanding of religion.

    Due to wrong methods, small problems occupy more time than greater problems, al-Khatib noted.

    The aim of the revolution was to free humans, al-Khatib stated.

    “Everyone should receive just treatment. Otherwise, anarchy would prevail and humans, based on certain reasons, would cause the spill of blood of others. There is tyranny in our country (Syria) as never seen before. A serious danger awaits us in the future. There is need for serious works so humans do not violate each other’s rights,” al-Khatib underlined.

    Criticizing Al-Qaeda’s call to establish an Islamic state in Syria, al-Khatib advised those fighting in Syria not to listen to thoughts coming from outside.

    ” Syria was a country where moderate Islam dominated.Syria is the center of enlightenment. Syria has a large number of scholars. Scholars of Syria can help each other,” al-Khatib said.

    “Revolution to continue until victory arrives”

    Chairman of the Syrian National Council (SNC), George Sabra underlined that the Syrian regime persecuted its own people and the world acted as if they were blind.

    “Revolution will continue until victory arrived. Justice will come with victory. Unless there is just punishment, justice can not be established. There will be a just constitution in new Syria and there will not be discrimination against any person or group. We will not treat those guilty with revenge. There will be just trials. Upcoming days would be nice,” Sabra stated.

    ”Syria will belong to all Syrians”

    Prime Minister of the Syrian interim government, Ghassan Hitto emphasized the importance of Islam’s message while moving to a state of law with justice and equality from a regime which placed pressure on people.

    A consensus will take place in Syria on a strong societal structure, Hitto said.

    “Syria will belong to all Syrians. Damages incurred by Syrian people would be compensated. The Justice Ministry would be restructured and just trials will take place,” Hitto noted.

    The conference will end on Tuesday.

    Islamic NGOs reject al-Qaeda announcement for “Islamic State in Iraq and Damascus”

    Syrian Islamic non-governmental organizations (NGOs) rejected announcement made by “Iraqi Islamic State” organization, the Iraqi wing of al-Qaeda, on the establishment of an “Islamic State in Iraq and Damascus”.

    In a joint statement made, the Union of Syrian Muslim Scholars, Union of Damascus Scholars, Union of Syrian Revolutionary Ulema and Inviters, and Syrian Islamic Forum underlined that al-Qaeda organization did not represent the people of Syria.

    “It is unacceptable to see a group, without a government or a certain territory, to announce the establishment of a state by not consulting with the relevant people and the scholars of the region and forcing the people to obey them. Our people have the strength to establish their own state with their own power and means,” the statement said.

    Referring to the Nusra Front in Syria and comments made by leader of the Nusra Front Abu Muhammad al-Golani that they were attached to al-Qaeda, the statement said “your struggle along with other armed groups in Syria is known and your support to the struggle is well appreciated. The people’s calling themselves ‘We are all Nusra Front’ on a Friday is an indication of the appreciation”.

    “Nusra Front’s declaration of attachment to al-Qaeda strengthens the hands of the Assad regime, presents the justification foreign powers need to intervene in Syria, and gives the excuse to the Syrian government to react against those ‘terrorists’ fighting in Syria. We call on our brethren at the Nusra Front to end obeying al-Qaeda and consult with those warriors on the field and scholars,” the statement underlined.

    “There is no bigger terror than that applied by the Syrian regime”

    “Our people will consider it a conspiracy against itself if an intervention takes place targeting the groups fighting in Syria or if the Syrian people were placed under a blockade with an excuse of ‘struggling against terrorists’. There is no bigger terror than that applied by the Syrian regime. We reject the intervention of all forms of organizations to determine the future of the Syrian state as well as any imposition from the international community to us to sit down with the Syrian regime at the table. The future of Syria will be determined by those who love Syria,” the statement also said.

    Al-Qaeda’s Iraqi wing, “Iraqi Islamic State” organization on April 9 had announced that they united with the Nusra Front.

    Nusra Front leader Abu Muhammad al-Golani had said that they had not taken a joint decision with the “Iraqi Islamic State” organization but that they were attached to al-Qaeda.

    16 April 2013

    Anadolu Agency