Category: Regions

  • Federation of Canadian Turkish Associations commemorates Mustafa Kemal Ataturk

    Federation of Canadian Turkish Associations commemorates Mustafa Kemal Ataturk

    Federation of Canadian Turkish Associations commemorates Mustafa Kemal Ataturk
    Kanada Turk Dernekleri Federasyonu Mustafa Kemal Ataturk’u aniyor.
    Dear Canadians of Turkish origin and friends of Turkish Canadians,

    Mustafa Kemal Ataturk founded a republic based on the principles of secularism, democracy, the respect of human rights by adopting the principles of gender equality, founded on the rules of civil law. He ensured that it was contemporary, progressive, peaceful and used science, knowledge, art as a source of power for the republic.

    We, women and men all Turkish Canadians in Canada, are commemorating Mustafa Kemal Ataturk with our deepest respects, affections and gratitude.

    75 years ago today on November 10 1938, the founder and the first president of the secular, democratic, modern, Republic of Turkey, Mustafa Kemal Ataturk died at the age of 57. He is globally recognized as one of the greatest revolutionary statesmen and as one of the most genius military commander of all times.

    Ataturk’s greatest achievement the Turkish Republic is celebrated 90th anniversary last month in Canada as well as a part of FCTA and member Association’s Republic and Ataturk month events. Mustafa Kemal Ataturk implemented many progressive reforms that transformed the country into today’s modern state that became the pioneer of democracy in the turbulent Middle East. An admirer of the Age of Enlightenment, Ataturk sought to transform the former Ottoman Empire into a modern, democratic, and secular nation-state.

    Ataturk Centennial was declared in 1981 by UNESCO. Ataturk is the only person to receive such recognition by UNESCO. It recognized Ataturk in particular that he was the leader of one of the earliest struggles against colonialism and imperialism. UNESCO recalled that Ataturk set an outstanding example in promoting the spirit of mutual understanding between peoples and lasting peace between the nations of the world, having advocated all his life the advent of ‘an age of harmony and co-operation in which no distinction would be made between men and women on account of color, religion, sex or race’.

    The crowning achievement of Great Leader Ataturk’s revolution is the role that it attached to women. Indeed, the strength of secularism in Turkey is best illustrated by the new social status of women and their new role in the public sphere. Secularism emancipated women from ancient and outdated practices, and eliminated the segregation of genders. Participation of women in social and public life as fully fledged citizens determines the distinct features of the modern secular way of life. Turkish women consider their status and roles as indispensable and irrevocable rights. It is the pride of the Turkish Republic Ataturk stands as one of the world’s few historic figures who dedicated their lives totally to their nations.

    Kind Regards,
    Huseyin Nurgel, M.Eng.,P.Eng.
    President, the Federation of Canadian Turkish Associations
    Phone: 416-303-2017
    Email: Info@TurkishFederation.ca
    Address: 1170 Sheppard Ave. West Unit 15, Toronto, Ontario, M3K 2A3
    www.TurkishFederation.ca | www.Fb.com/TurkishFederation | www.twitter.com/TurkFederation
    Sayin Kanada Turk Toplumu ve Kanadali Turklerin Dostlari,

    Laik, demokratik, insan haklarina saygili, kadin erkek esitligi prensiplerini benimsemis, medeni hukuk kurallari uzerine kurulmus, cagdas, ilerici, barisci, gucunu bilim, sanat ve akildan alan Turkiye Cumhuriyetimizin kurucusu olan ulu onder, buyuk asker, buyuk devlet adami Mustafa Kemal Ataturk’u, Kanada’da kadin-erkek hep birlikte, sonsuz minnet, sukran ve rahmetle aniyoruz.

    75 yil once bugun 10 Kasim 1938 tarihinde; laik , demokratik, cagdas Turkiye Cumhuriyeti’nin kurucusu ve ilk cumhurbaskani Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, 57 yasinda vefat etti . Dunyaca tum zamanlarin en buyuk devrimci devlet adamlarindan ve en dahi ordu komutani olarak kabul edilmektedir.

    Ataturk’un buyuk basarisi ve bizlere emaneti Turk Cumhuriyeti 90. yildonumu gectigimiz Ekim ayinda “Cumhuriyet ve Ataturk Ayi etkinlikleri kapsaminda tum Kanada cografyasinda buyuk bir cosku ile kutlanmistir. Mustafa Kemal Atatürk devrimleri ile ulkesini çalkantılı Orta Doğu’da demokrasinin öncüsü haline getirmistir.

    UNESCO 1981 yilinda, 100. Dogum Yildonumu nedeniyle Ataturk’u “Ulusal Mucadele ve Cagdaslasma Lideri” olarak ilan ederek evrensel niteliklerini ortaya koymustur. Bu karar dogrultusunda, Ataturk’un dogumunun 100. yili butun dunyada, “1981 Ataturk Yili” olarak kutlanmistir. Bu uygulama, dunyada ilk ve tektir. UNESCO Onderimiz Mustafa Kemal Ataturk’u “Uluslararasi anlayis ve isbirligi, baris yolunda caba gostermis ustun bir kisi; olaganustu devrimler gerceklestirmis bir devrimci, somurgecilik ve yayilimciliga karsi savasan ilk onder, insan haklarina saygili, dunya barisinin oncusu, butun yasami boyunca insanlar arasinda renk, din, irk cinsiyet ayrimi gozetmeyen essiz bir devlet adami, Turkiye Cumhuriyetinin Kurucusu.” olarak deklare etmistir.

    Ulu Onder Ataturk’un devriminin en parlak basarisi elbetteki kadin haklaridir . Gercekten de, Turkiye’de laikligin gucu en iyi sekilde, kadinin yeni sosyal konumu ve kamusal alandaki yeni rolu ile gosterilmistir. Laiklik kadini eski ve cagdisi uygulamalardan kurtarmis, cinsiyet ayrimini ortadan kaldirmistir. Kadinlarin sosyal ve kamusal yasama tam tesekkullu vatandas olarak katilimi modern laik yasam tarzinin en belirgin ozellikligini belirler. Turk kadinlari yeni sosyal konumlari ve rollerini vazgecilmez ve geri donulmez haklar olarak gormektedirler. Turkiye Cumhuriyeti vatandaslarinin onuru, cok az sayidaki tarihi isimlerden biri olan Ataturk gibi bir dahinin, kendi ulkeleri icin hayatinin adamis bir onder olmasidir.

    Saygilarimla,
    Huseyin Nurgel, M.Eng.,P.Eng.
    Baskan, Kanada Turk Dernekleri Federasyonu
    Phone: 416-303-2017
    Email: Info@TurkishFederation.ca
    Address: 1170 Sheppard Ave. West Unit 15, Toronto, Ontario, M3K 2A3
    www.TurkishFederation.ca | www.Fb.com/TurkishFederation | www.twitter.com/TurkFederation
  • Turkey seeks to lock in long-term security

    Turkey seeks to lock in long-term security

    By Soner Cagaptay, Saturday, November 9, 1:42 AM

    Soner Cagaptay is a fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy and the author of “The Rise of Turkey: The Twenty-First Century’s First Muslim Power.” He is on Twitter: @sonercagaptay.

    Two years ago, I argued in a Post op-ed that Turkey was pivoting toward the United States. This policy has not ushered in what Ankara wanted: American firepower to oust the Assad regime in Syria. And feeling alone, Turkey has started to seek other allies, including Beijing.

    When the Justice and Development Party (AKP) came to power in 2002, Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan and other Turkish officials toyed with the idea of being a stand-alone actor in the Middle East. By 2011, they had realized that the Arab Spring would create long-term instability in their neighborhood and would position Iran against Turkey in Syria. Turkey adeptly pivoted toward the United States. The two nations worked with other countries to oust Moammar Gaddafi in Libya that year and, early on, coordinated policies against the Assad regime .

    Gallery

    Tom Toles goes global: A collection of cartoons about international news.

    Even more important for U.S.-Turkish relations, President Obama and Erdogan hit it off. The two leaders spoke often and were eager to listen to each other about Middle East issues. The convergence was so apparent that in September 2011 Turkey abandoned its rhetorical hedging that Iran “has the right to pursue nuclear energy research for peaceful purposes” and joined NATO’s missile defense shield.

    This is why Turkey’s recent announcement that it would buy air defense systems from China — a first for any NATO member — was a shock. If finalized, this deal would deal a serious blow to Turkey’s relations with the United States and with NATO, opening the alliance’s security umbrella to potential Chinese snooping.

    Two issues are driving Ankara’s pivot away from Washington. First, Turkey aspires to build its defense industry and has been disappointed that U.S. companies would not transfer technology in return for weapons purchases. Turkish officials see turning to China as a way to enhance their bargaining power with U.S. companies.

    Second, Turkey is signaling its disappointment with the Obama administration’s Syria policy — or lack thereof. Turkey has pursued regime change in Damascus since 2012, providing weapons and haven to the Syrian opposition. Ankara has tried to persuade Washington to join its efforts and significantly support the opposition. The United States has done neither.

    Turkey’s sense of abandonment was heightened in the aftermath of the chemical weapons deal U.S. and Russian officials brokered in September, which, in Turkish minds, provided a lifeline for the Assad regime.

    Turkey foresees two grave eventual­ities in Syria: an Iran-backed hostile rump state at its border — whose leaders will not forget Ankara’s support for the Syrian rebels — and al-Qaeda-controlled enclaves.

    Whichever way Syria goes, Turkish officials expect that the outcome is likely to be unfavorable for them and that they will need allies to mitigate the fallout.

    The Turkish government’s heavy-handed treatment of protesters this summer also affected the relationship. When the police cracked down on a small pro-environment gathering in Istanbul, millions of Turks took to the streets to demand respect for freedom of assembly and liberal democracy — and were met with a more violent government reaction. Before these protests, Erdogan and Obama chatted often. Since then, Washington has been mostly deaf to Turkish appeals on Syria.

    For the past decade, Turkey has been surrounded by mostly troubled neighbors. By comparison, it has looked like an island of stability. Istanbul’s financial markets have attracted international capital in excess of $40 billion annually, driving record-breaking growth. The Syrian civil war changes this context. With a weak and divided state next door and al-Qaeda at its border, Turkey’s image as the region’s stable nation is eroding, and its economic growth could be undermined. This could complicate, or even derail, Erdogan’s plans to run for president next year as he is likely to be elected again only if Turkey continues growing.

    So after failing to get a U.S. commitment on action in Syria, Turkey is flirting with the Chinese and, potentially, the Russians to lock in additional long-term security. Eyeing the negotiations over Iran’s nuclear program, Turkish officials could seek their own deal with Tehran over Syria. Turkey hosted the Iranian foreign minister in Ankara on Nov. 1, hinting at the end of a period of cold ties. Ankara is trying to ameliorate its relations with Iraq, which soured over Baghdad’s objection to warm ties between Turks and the Iraqi Kurds. Turkey needs Iraq, one of Syria’s other neighbors, as an ally to contain a Syrian meltdown if it cannot bring an end to the Assad regime.

    The honeymoon in U.S.-Turkish ties is over. Turkey is out to gather as many friends as it can line up in the Middle East. The United States might be just one of them.

    via Turkey seeks to lock in long-term security – The Washington Post.

  • Regional War Scenario. NATO-US-Turkey War Games Off the Syrian Coastline

    Regional War Scenario. NATO-US-Turkey War Games Off the Syrian Coastline

    According to Turkish press reports, Turkey’s High Command will be hosting NATO’S Invitex military exercise in the Eastern Mediterranean in a clear act of provocation directed against Syria.

    The Invitex-Eastern Mediterranean war games are scheduled from November 4 to 14.

    Deafening silence. Not a single Western media has reported on these war games.

    The official release by the TKS High Command suggests a war games scenario involving a regional war, under the assumption that the ongoing US-NATO-Israeli covert war on Syria could lead to military escalation. The countries considered to be a threat to Turkey and NATO are not mentioned.

    According to the press dispatch of the Turkish Armed forces, various types of naval operations are envisaged. While the word “war” is not mentioned, the  stated objective consists in the “handling of a regional crisis”, presumably through military rather than diplomatic means.

    Turkish frigate F-245 TCG Oruç Reis

    The focus is intended “to enhance co-operation and mutual training between participant countries.” Reading between the lines this suggests enhanced military coordination directed against potential enemy countries in the Middle East including Syria and Iran.

    “NATO, the U.S. Navy and the Turkish Navy-Air Force-Coast Guard platforms will participate in the exercise, a statement from Turkish Armed Forces (TSK) said Nov. 4.”(Hurriyet Daily News, Turkey)

    A significant deployment of both naval and air power is envisaged. According to the TKS communique, the participant units are:

    NATO SNMG-2 (three frigates), U.S. Navy (one frigate), Turkish Navy (three frigates, two corvettes, four fast attack boats, three submarines, two oilers, two patrol boats, one landing ship, one tug boat, one maritime patrol aircraft, five helicopters, one amphibious team, one Naval WMD Destroy Team, (Multi National Maritime Security Center of Excellence), Turkish Coast Guard (three Coast Guard Boats) and Turkish Air Force aircrafts. (Ibid)

    Frigates are used for amphibious operations and the landing of ground forces. To be noted, the war games include seven frigates, not to mention one landing ship, and an amphibious team.

    SNMG 2 refers to Standing NATO Maritime Group 2, NATO standing maritime Immediate Reaction Forces. SNMG 2 is “a multinational, integrated maritime force – made up of vessels from various allied nations, training and operating together as a single team”.The NATO member states involved in the war games was not disclosed.

    Of significance, these war games overlap with bilateral military exercises between Turkey and Jordan which include the participation of special forces from both countries.

    De Zeven Provinciën-class frigate (Netherlands) (right)

    These bilateral Turkey-Jordan war games have not been reported upon. They are scheduled to end on November 9. These bilateral military exercises are intent upon enhancing military cooperation between the two countries, both of which are using special forces in the training and hosting of rebel mercenaries.

    The objective of the war games is to threaten Syria.

    The two sets of war games will be coordinated.  What seems to be envisaged, in this regard, is a scenario of invasion of an unnamed enemy country from war ships stationed in the Eastern Mediterranean, supported by air power. This would be carried out in coordination with US-NATO and allied special forces on the ground operating out of Turkey and Jordan in support of Al Qaeda affiliated rebel forces.

    Amply documented,  Turkey and Jordan are supporting the influx of both mercenary and covert special forces including death squads into Syria, respectively on Syria’s Northern and Southern border.

    Is Russia threatened by these war game? Russia is an ally of Syria. It has a naval base in the Eastern Mediterranean operating out of the port of Tartus in Southern Syria.

    In a bitter irony, coinciding with the NATO Invitex military exercises, NATO is conducting large-scale war games in proximity of the Russian border. The Ukraine, which is not a NATO country is participating in these war games directed against Russia.

    “The military exercise, called Steadfast Jazz, will see the Western alliance put 6,000 of its soldiers, mariners and airmen through their paces in Poland and in the Baltic Sea region from 2 to 9 November. … ”

    Meanwhile,  the US threatens China as part of Obama’s Asian pivot: October 25-28, U.S. Navy Carrier Strike Group Five (America’s largest Strike Group) led by the The USS George Washington staged joint military exercises in the South China Sea.

    via Regional War Scenario. NATO-US-Turkey War Games Off the Syrian Coastline | Global Research.

  • TURKEY: A POTENTIAL MIDDLE EAST WRECKING BALL?

    TURKEY: A POTENTIAL MIDDLE EAST WRECKING BALL?

    By Joe Rothstein

    Editor, EINnews.com

    Think politics is complicated and governing is difficult in the U.S.? Take a look at Turkey. And we SHOULD be looking at Turkey, because it’s key to what happens in the entire Middle East.

    I’ve recently returned from two weeks in Turkey, weeks when protesters continued to flood Istanbul’s most prominent commercial area and police in riot gear joined other sightseeing spectacles in that most picturesque and exotic of cities.

    Officially, 98 percent of the country’s 77 million citizens are Muslim. The call to prayer is a constant reminder of that. But constitutionally, and by fierce tradition, Turkey is a secular country. Turkey’s neighbors are a Rogue’s Gallery of international bad boys: Syria, Iraq, Iran, Libya. Nearly 20 percent of Turkey’s population is Kurdish, an ethnic group whose most radical members have been fighting an interminable war on Turkey’s eastern border to gain independence. And while Turkish ethnicity is different from Arabs, Turkish sultans ruled most of the Arab world from Istanbul for more than 600 years, right into the early 20th century.

    How’s that for a complex religious, ethnic and political brew to govern?

    Turkey’s most revered political figure, Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, took over from the last sultan after World War I and governed with an iron hand—achieving results rarely matched by any leader of any country in modern history. In fewer than 10 years with Ataturk at the helm, Turkey:

    –aligned with the West rather than the East
    –removed Islam as the state religion and substituted civil law for Islamic law
    –adopted the Western calendar
    –decreed that Turks should have surnames, similar to Western custom
    –changed the alphabet from Arabic script to Roman letters
    –abolished polygamy
    –emancipated women
    –established universal education
    –established constitutional democracy

    Each year at precisely 9:05 a.m. on November 10, all of Turkey still observes a moment of silence in his name, so enduring and popular has been Ataturk’s stamp on the nation’s life.

    Ten years ago, Ataturk’s democratic nation gave its vote to a recently-formed Islamist political party, and Recep Tayyip Erdogan became its prime minister. The vote was widely seen as one in which Turks were fed up with the corruption of the existing regime. Erdogan has ruled since then, a period in which the nation has thrived economically.

    Increasingly, however, resistance to Erdogan has grown, largely over fears that he is steering Turkey away from its secular course into more Islamic channels. He and his party are pushing hard for constitutional changes that would make him president, with vastly increased executive powers.

    Earlier this year, in what’s seen as one of those Freudian slip-type moments surfacing his real intentions, Erdogan snapped back at opponents of his proposed restrictions on liquor sales saying, “If legislation introduced by two drunks is respectable, why do you feel a law dictated by religion should be rejected?”

    This was a breathtaking slap at the untouchable memory of Ataturk, whose alcoholism was well-known and likely killed him with cirrhosis of the liver. Despite the outcry, Erdogan forged ahead and implemented draconian controls on the use and advertisement of liquor sales, claiming he was doing it to protect young people.

    It was essentially those same young people and leaders of the political opposition who turned Istanbul’s Taksim Square and other locations in Turkey into war zones last summer, confronting Erdogan for what they see as a growing dictatorial threat. In response, Erdogan developed what he called a “Democracy Package,” aimed at tamping down concerns.

    But the package granted police more power to detain anyone they think may be organizing a protest, and on October 30, crowds, pepper spray and riot police were once again in the streets of Istanbul’s main shopping and tourist district.

    Why is all this important to the U.S.? Because Turkey is the economic lynchpin of the Middle East, a role it’s played for a thousand years. Istanbul exists in both Europe and Asia. Just the other day a new mile-long tunnel under the Bosporus Strait opened for traffic, connecting the two continents. The city’s 14 million people represent the second largest urban area in the world (Shanghai is number one), and its economy is booming. The number of high rises built and being constructed is staggering to see. Many retail malls hold their own and then some with the finest in the U.S.

    Since early Cold War days, Turkey has been a valued NATO partner. Its cooperation has been essential in both Iraq wars, the fight against Islamic extremism, and currently with the delicate and dangerous nuclear negotiations with Iran.

    For Turkey to fracture on a fault line between Ataturk secularists and those who favor restoration of an Islamist and expansionist state would be more destabilizing to the region’s military and economic order than anything that has yet occurred during this era of post-Arab spring.

    Could it happen? In Taksim Square protesters are chanting “We are the soldiers of Mustafa Kemal” and “Shoulder to shoulder against fascism.” Erdogan is not a leader who tolerates such things lightly.

    This happens to be the year of the Istanbul’s Biennial exhibition of art. Standing in front of Istanbul’s shiny new Museum of Modern Art I saw a display that perfectly sums up the moment: Turkish artist Ayse Erkmen’s replica of a wrecking ball swinging from a crane into the museum wall itself. The “ball” is soft and the “bang” is electronically created. The question for Turkey is, will it remain that way.

    (Joe Rothstein can be contacted at joe@einnews.com)

  • Davutoglu: Turkey will never cooperate with Israel against a Muslim country

    Turkish FM denies involvement in strike on Syrian airbase attributed to Jerusalem, says Ankara’s ‘issues’ with Damascus are ‘based on principle’BY TIMES OF ISRAEL STAFF November 2, 2013, 12:21

    Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu (right) with Iran’s Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif, in Istanbul, Turkey, Friday, Nov. 1, 2013. (photo credit: AP Photo)NEWSROOM

    Israel ‘furious’ with White House for leak on Syria strikeADL chief: US seen as ‘weak and retreating’ on world stage‘Israel doesn’t expect Assad to respond to attack’‘Turkey behind strike on Latakia airbase in Syria’US official: Israel hit Hezbollah-bound missiles in SyriaSyria completes destruction of chemical arms equipment Claire Danes to host Nobel Peace Prize concertSaudi resolution slams Syria’s human rights recordHuge explosion reported at Syrian air defense baseSyrian base targeted in blast may have housed advanced missiles

    Turkey on Saturday denied reports of its involvement in an alleged Israeli air strike on a military base in Latakia, Syria on Wednesday, which allegedly targeted “missiles and related equipment” meant for Lebanese terror group Hezbollah.

    Turkish Foreign Minister Agmet Davutoglu said Saturday: “There is an attempt to give the impression that Turkey has coordinated with Israel. We have issues with Syria, an issue based on a principle. But let me say it clearly: The Turkish government has never cooperated with Israel against any Muslim country, and it never will.”

    Davutoglu was speaking at a joint press conference with Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammed Zarif Saturday in Istanbul.

    The Turkish FM slammed the reports, describing them as “black propaganda.” “Those [reports] are attempts to cast a shadow on the Syrian people’s rightful struggle and Turkey’s attitude with principles. It is out of the question for us to participate in any common operation,” he was quoted by Turkish daily Hurriyet as saying.

    On Thursday, a report by Lebanon’s MTV Thursday cited Turkey as being behind the Wednesday attack in Syria, but subsequent reports claimed Turkey merely supplied intelligence to Israel. The Lebanese report cited Israeli officials who allegedly claimed Turkish involvement came in response to the June 2012 interception of a Turkish jet, which Syrian forces shot down. The pilots were subsequently killed.

    On Thursday, an Obama administration official told CNN it was Israeli warplanes that attacked the airbase in Latakia. An American security official told AP that the attack occurred in the Syrian port city of Latakia and that the target was Russian-made SA-125 missiles.

    The Israeli government and military establishment have declined to comment, and on Friday it was reported that the government reacted with fury at the leak by the Americans.

    On Thursday, one Israeli official told Reuters he thought Israel had carried out the strike, but wasn’t certain. Israel has repeatedly warned that any attempt to transfer to Hezbollah chemical or other game-changing weapons would constitute a “red line” and precipitate military action.

    Earlier Thursday, on the heels of reports that the airbase had contained advanced, Russian-made, anti-aircraft missiles, al-Arabiya reported that Israel had attacked not one, but two targets in the civil war-torn country.

    Al-Arabiya’s report said two targets had been hit in Syria on Wednesday night — not just the Latakia air defense base, but a target in Damascus as well. Both targets were said to have contained shipments of Russian SA-8 anti-aircraft missiles meant for Hezbollah, which were reportedly completely destroyed.

    A map of the Latakia airbase posted online shows three batteries of the Russian-made surface-to-air anti-aircraft missile at the base, outside Snobar Jableh in the country’s coastal Latakia region.

    Al-Arabiya quoted opposition forces as saying the base held S-125 missiles.

    The S-125 is especially effective against maneuverable low- to medium-altitude targets, including aircraft. The Egyptians used such missiles with some success during the War of Attrition and the 1973 Yom Kippur War, and batteries used by Iraq may have knocked down coalition aircraft in the First Gulf War.

    The system has undergone improvements since then, but countermeasures have also progressed significantly.

    A massive explosion was reported at the base late Wednesday night, with some reports that it was targeted by missiles fired from the sea. The Syrian news outlet Dam Press, considered loyal to the regime of Bashar Assad, reported that the site was damaged but that there had been no injuries.

    Earlier on Wednesday, the Lebanese government news agency reported six Israeli aircraft flying through Lebanese airspace along the coast north of Beirut.

    The coastal strip of Syria, encompassing the cities of Tartous, Latakia and Baniyas, is part of a predominantly Alawite portion of the country, which remains loyal to the Assad regime in its lengthy campaign against rebels.

    Israel has been accused of striking Syrian sites in the past, including in January and May this year. Israel refused to confirm the reports that it targeted weapons transfers, possibly to Hezbollah, which has remained loyal to Assad during the country’s bloody civil war.

    Syria is reportedly in the midst of upgrading its missile-defense system to the Russian-made S-300, a move Israel has lobbied against.

    The Associated Press contributed to this report.

    via Davutoglu: Turkey will never cooperate with Israel against a Muslim country | The Times of Israel.

  • Turkey rejects more for Gallipoli 100th

    Turkey rejects more for Gallipoli 100th

    • From: The Australian
    • October 23, 2013 12:00AM

    ANZCoveBig

    TURKEY has rejected an Australian request to increase the number of Australians and New Zealanders visiting Gallipoli for the 100th anniversary of the Anzac landings.

    The Turks insist that for safety reasons no more than 10,500 Australians and New Zealanders may attend the commemoration on April 25, 2015. And the Abbott government will press on with the plan for a national ballot to allocate those places to those who want to attend.

    When the ballot plan was announced by the Labor government last year, battlefield tour operators and some of those who had booked places reacted angrily to the Department of Veterans Affairs’ plan to limit the number able to attend the dawn service. The Coalition undertook to review the planning for the centenary if it won government.

    The Minister Assisting the Prime Minister for the Centenary of Anzac, Michael Ronaldson, said he had discussed the numbers with the Turkish government. “It’s been made very clear to me . . . that they view 10,500 as the maximum figure. They are our hosts. They are very generous hosts and if that’s the figure they believe is appropriate then that’s the figure we will work on.”

    He said he would make announcements about the ballot process in the next month. The previous government’s estimates of the numbers of people eligible for the various categories in the ballot were reasonable.

    But large numbers of Australians wanted to make the journey and there had to be a way to ensure that those who entered the ballot actually intended to go, Senator Ronaldson said.

    “It’s important that people have thought long and hard about whether they want to go, whether they can go and whether they will go,” he said.

    To take some of the pressure off the anniversary of the Anzac landing, Senator Ronaldson is considering a proposal for commemoration ceremonies marking other key dates.

    “I’m looking at how we might be able to have some smaller, but no less important for the families involved, commemorative activities through the campaign.”

    In April, former defence force chief Angus Houston told The Australian that being at Gallipoli in August for the anniversaries of the battles such as Lone Pine and The Nek or the evacuation would give visitors the space to contemplate the Anzac sacrifice without battling the crowds expected to mark the 100th anniversary of the landing.

    Mr Houston, who headed the inquiry into how the Gallipoli centenary should be commemorated, said it could be dangerous to allow unlimited numbers to visit. “I think if you just have a free-for-all, it will be a shambles. The simple fact is that the site will not take more than 10,500 people,” he said.

    He said it might be possible to have a small team including a chaplain and a bugler at Gallipoli to carry out services daily during the anniversary period.

    Senator Ronaldson said a key priority for him as minister would be caring for those who served in Afghanistan and Iraq and other conflicts.

    He said he wanted the next generation of Australians to come out of the Anzac commemorative period with a clear understanding of a century of sacrifice, from World War I to Afghanistan, knowing where their forebears fought, when they fought and the values they were fighting to defend, as well as what 102,000 names on the Australian War Memorial meant.

    via Turkey rejects more for Gallipoli 100th | The Australian.

    • From: The Australian
    • October 23, 2013 12:00AM

    – See more at: