Category: Regions

  • Questions asked of UK police after pro-PKK rallies

    Questions asked of UK police after pro-PKK rallies

    Despite laws banning displays of support for ‘proscribed organizations’, London has seen a number of pro-PKK events

    PKK 02

    By Ahmet Gurhan Kartal

    AA

    LONDON

    The activities of PKK sympathizers in London over the past two weeks is coming under more scrutiny, with questions being asked as to why backers of an illegal group are allowed to gather and mobilize publicly.

    Groups of protestors carrying PKK flags, banners and posters — bearing the insignia of the illegal group or the likeness of its jailed leader Abdullah Ocalan — have been seen recently on the streets of the U.K. capital.

    PKK supporters have been observed shouting anti-Turkish slogans and were able to mount propaganda without interference from the authorities, despite laws that regard some of their actions on these marches as criminal offences.

    In recent rallies, two young Turkish citizens were attacked, a policeman was injured and some members of the general public were harassed.

    The U.K. listed the PKK and various front groups as illegal organizations in March 2001. According to the Home Office, this means all their activities are banned, as is membership of or inviting support for such groups.

    The PKK — listed as a terrorist organization by Turkey, the U.S. and EU — resumed its decades-old armed campaign in July last year. Since then, more than 300 civilians and nearly 800 security personnel in Turkey have been martyred. Around 8,000 PKK terrorists have been killed or apprehended.

    However, London police have denied turning a blind eye to protests backing an illegal group.

    Following a demonstration on Nov. 6 in the city’s Green Lanes area, the Metropolitan Police told Anadolu Agency it would not “allow a protest by a proscribed organization to take place in London”.

    In an email, a spokesman added: “On this occasion the demonstrations were spontaneous. Where there is evidence that an individual is committing offences, officers will take action when and where appropriate.”

    However, another procession held in central London on Nov. 12 was not spontaneous, having been planned, discussed and organized on a social media page for about a week beforehand.

    In a separate email, police told Anadolu Agency the organizers of this procession engaged with the authorities beforehand and the route was altered to avoid Parliament Square.

    Proscribed groups

    Police on motorbikes opened the way for the group between Parliament Square and Piccadilly Circus via Regents Street.

    A police van divided the road into two by using a white cordon until the demonstrators, some of who carried PKK emblems and flags, reached and encircled Piccadilly Circus’s famous Eros statue where they read out statements through a loudspeaker.

    However, police described the Nov. 12 protest as a “march by a Kurdish Community Group”.

    “This group is not a proscribed organization. The Met would not allow a protest by a proscribed organization to take place in London,” the statement added.

    The U.K.’s Home Office says members or supporters of a proscribed organization are banned from showing and displaying articles of the group in public.

    Official guidelines state it is a criminal offense to “arrange, manage or assist in arranging or managing a meeting in the knowledge that the meeting is to support or further the activities of a proscribed organization”.

    It is also an offense to “wear clothing or carry or display articles in public in such a way or in such circumstances as arouse reasonable suspicion that an individual is a member or supporter of the proscribed organization”.

    However, despite the fact that the processions openly displayed PKK flags and posters, police failed to identify them on Nov. 12 or during previous rallies.

    Regarding the Nov. 12 demonstration, police said: “This was a peaceful protest and there were no reports of proscribed flags or organizations present… If offenses are committed by those taking part in a protest these offenses are reported and investigated.”

    Former U.K. counter-terrorism detective David Videcette said police were unfamiliar with illegal PKK insignia due to a lack of training. He said policing the display of flags was “somewhat difficult in terms of the legality surrounding them here in the U.K.”

    ‘Lack of training’

    He added: “Recently a man was seen wearing an Islamic State flag while standing outside our Parliament building. His son was waving an ISIS flag too.” ISIS is another acronym for Daesh.

    “In order to prove that this was illegal, and that the man was a member of a proscribed organization, the police need more evidence than just the fact he is displaying a flag.

    “It is true that he could have been arrested and an investigation started to establish this but often police officers are reluctant if there are no other obvious signs, there and then, of membership, other than the flag.”

    Videcette told Anadolu Agency that “this is often a lack of training and understanding of the laws in the U.K. — arresting someone for terrorism is a specialist area of policing in the U.K., and few understand the laws surrounding it”.

    He said he would “very much doubt that many police officers have any idea what the PKK flag even looks like. This makes dealing with it during any rally difficult.”

    The U.K. government, however, is clear. Official Home Office rules state: “PKK/KADEK/KG is primarily a separatist movement that seeks an independent Kurdish state in southeast Turkey. The PKK changed its name to KADEK and then to Kongra Gele Kurdistan, although the PKK acronym is still used by parts of the movement.”

    In October 2015, a woman of Kurdish origin was found guilty of PKK-related terrorism after she ran away from her family in an attempt to join the organization and sentenced to 21 months’ imprisonment.

    Silhan Ozcelik became the first-ever person to be convicted in the U.K. of terror charges related to the PKK.

    Videcette said: “I believe that the police service would and should act if the PKK flag is seen, just like they should have acted on the occasions that the ISIS flag has been seen at rallies.

    “Sadly, it is often the case here that action is not taken at the time. In essence this is a training issue for the U.K. police service.”

  • Scottish police investigate PKK funding claims BBC Reports

    Scottish police investigate PKK funding claims BBC Reports

    PKK 01Counter-terror police in Edinburgh are carrying out a major investigation into fears a Kurdish rebel group is being financed from the city.

    According to BBC, Officers are investigating claims a number of individuals have been linked to the financing of Kurdish militia.

    The probe is reportedly being centred on the PKK, known as the Kurdistan Workers’ Party, which is based in Turkey and Iraq.

    Police said they have carried out a number of raids as part of the inquiry.

    The investigation is examining allegations of fraud and immigration offenses.

    The PKK has led an armed struggle against the Turkish government on and off for the past 30 years and is considered a terrorist organisation by the UK.

    A senior anti-terror officer has reassured the Scottish public that no-one was in danger at any time.

    Det Ch Sup Gerry McLean, head of the Organised Crime and Counter Terrorism Unit, said: “As part of a police investigation along with partner agencies, we executed a number of search warrants in relation to financial investigation and suspected fraud.

    “Matters have now been reported to the procurator fiscal, and as such it would be inappropriate to comment further at this time.

    “I would like to reassure the public that there was no danger to them at any time.”

    The Herald newspaper reported on Saturday that a formal written briefing has been issued by Police Scotland to the Scottish Police Authority, outlining the investigation so far.

    Immigration offences

    The letter states: “Elite organised crime and the counter terrorism units are leading a multi-agency investigation into individuals assessed to be fundraising for a proscribed terrorist organisation.

    “Executive action in collaboration with several partnership agencies was conducted in the east of Scotland.

    “Locations were searched under the Customs and Excise Management Act, Common Law Fraud and the Terrorism Act.

    “Subsequent investigation identified additional immigration act offences, with a significant sum of money potentially eligible for Proceeds of Crime Act confiscation.

    “This operation has provided investigative opportunities to allow continued collaboration with Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, Trading Standards and Home Office Immigration Enforcement.”

    A report has now been sent to the procurator fiscal to assess whether to charge the individuals identified by the police.

  • Flash News! Trump threatens BMW with border tax on cars built in Mexico

    Flash News! Trump threatens BMW with border tax on cars built in Mexico

    BMW
    A view shows the logo of BMW on a car in Moscow, Russia, July 6, 2016. REUTERS/Maxim Zmeyev

     

    According to Reuters President-elect Donald Trump has warned the United States will impose a border tax of 35 percent on cars that German carmaker BMW plans to build at a new plant in Mexico and export to the U.S. market.

    Trump was speaking in an interview with German newspaper Bild, which on Sunday released excerpts of his comments translated into German.

    A BMW spokeswoman said a BMW Group plant in San Luis Potosi would build the BMW 3 Series starting from 2019, with the output intended for the world market. The plant in Mexico would be an addition to existing 3 Series production facilities in Germany and China.

    Trump said BMW should build its new car factory in the United States because this would be “much better” for the company.

    He went on to say Germany was a great car producer, borne out by Mercedes Benz cars being a frequent sight in New York, but there was no reciprocity.

    Germans were not buying Chevrolets at the same rate, he said, making the business relationship an unfair one-way street. He said he was an advocate of free trade, but not at any cost.

    The BMW spokeswoman said the company was “very much at home in the U.S.,” employing directly and indirectly nearly 70,000 people in the country.

    (Reporting by Michael Nienaber and Edward Taylor; writing by Vera Eckert; editing by Andrew Roche)

  • UK: Israel’s ambassador sorry over ‘take down’ Sir Alan Duncan comment

    UK: Israel’s ambassador sorry over ‘take down’ Sir Alan Duncan comment

    Israel embassy1 1

    Israel’s ambassador to the UK has apologized after a senior member of his staff was secretly filmed saying he wanted to “take down” Foreign Office Minister Sir Alan Duncan.

    Israeli Embassy senior political officer Shai Masot made the comment in footage filmed in a London restaurant and obtained by the Mail on Sunday.

    He told a reporter that Sir Alan was creating “a lot of problems”.

    Ambassador Mark Regev said this was not the embassy or government’s view BBC reported.

    Secret recording

    The conversation involved Mr Masot and Maria Strizzolo, an aide to education minister Robert Halfon, the former political director of Conservative Friends of Israel, as well as an undercover reporter.

    It was recorded in October 2016 as part of an investigation by Al Jazeera.

    The BBC understands that Ms Strizzolo has resigned from the civil service.

    Mr Masot asked her: “Can I give you some names of MPs that I would suggest you take down?”

    Ms Strizzolo replied that all MPs have “something they’re trying to hide” and Mr Masot responded by saying “I have some MPs”, adding “she knows which MPs I want to take down” before specifying “the deputy foreign minister”.

    Sir Alan, who has described expanding Israeli settlements as a “stain on the face of the globe”, was seen as more of a problem than Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson – who was “basically good”, according to Mr Masot in a transcript of the conversation.

    “He just doesn’t care. He is an idiot but has become minister of foreign affairs without any responsibilities. If something real happened it won’t be his fault… it will be Alan Duncan.”

    Sir Alan launched a scathing attack on Israel in 2014, when MPs backed Palestinian statehood, deeming Israeli settlements as an “act of theft”.

    “Occupation, annexation, illegality, negligence, complicity – this is a wicked cocktail which brings shame on Israel,” he told BBC Radio 4’s World At One programme.

    Sir Alan, who was special envoy to Yemen and Oman at the time, said “international law must be upheld” to prevent further settlements.

    Labour has demanded an immediate inquiry into the extent of Israeli “interference” in British politics.

    Shadow foreign secretary Emily Thornberry said improper interference was “unacceptable whichever country was involved” adding Mr Masot’s comments were “extremely disturbing”.

    She said it was a national security issue and that the Foreign Office’s response was “not good enough”.

    ‘Completely unacceptable’

    Crispin Blunt, Foreign Affairs Select Committee chairman, said Mr Masot’s “apparent activity” was “formally outrageous and deserving of investigation”.

    But Sir Craig Oliver, David Cameron’s former communications director, said the undercover video was a “classic piece of mischief-making” by the Mail on Sunday.

    He told the BBC’s Andrew Marr Show that Mr Masot’s comments should be viewed as “extremely comic” rather than “extremely chilling”.

    “The Israeli government just wants to shut [the story] down,” he added. “It’s embarrassing”.

    Lord Stuart Polak, director of Conservative Friends of Israel, said: “We utterly condemn any attempt to undermine Sir Alan, or any minister, or any member of Parliament.”

    Ms Strizzolo told the newspaper that her conversation with Mr Masot was “tongue-in-cheek and gossipy”.

    In a statement, the Israeli Embassy said it “rejects the remarks concerning minister Duncan, which are completely unacceptable”.

    “The comments were made by a junior embassy employee who is not an Israeli diplomat, and who will be ending his term of employment with the embassy shortly,” it said.

    “Ambassador Regev on Friday spoke with minister Duncan, apologised for the comments and made clear that the embassy considered the remarks to be completely unacceptable.”

    A Foreign Office spokesman said: “The Israeli Ambassador has apologised and is clear these comments do not reflect the views of the embassy or government of Israel.

    “The UK has a strong relationship with Israel and we consider the matter closed.”

  • Benjamin Netanyahu accused of offering newspaper owner commercial favours in return for positive coverage

    Benjamin Netanyahu accused of offering newspaper owner commercial favours in return for positive coverage

    Israeli Prime Minister already being investigated for accepting gifts of champagne and cigars but denies any wrongdoing

    According to the Independent Benjamin Netanyahu has been caught on tape offering commercial favours to an Israeli newspaper owner in return for more positive coverage, reports suggest, in a development commentators are describing as an “earthquake” in the police investigation.

    The Israeli Prime Minister, who is being investigated for alleged corruption offenses, is said to have been recorded proposing a commercially beneficial deal to Arnon Mozes, the owner of one of Israel’s biggest newspapers, Yedioth Ahronoth.

    He has denied any wrongdoing.

    Israel’s Channel Two television station claimed Mr. Netanyahu had offered to reduce the circulation of Israel Hayom, a pro-Netanyahu newspaper that is owned by U.S. billionaire and Republican Party donor Sheldon Adelson, if Mozes instructed Yedioth Ahronoth to be more favourable towards the Prime Minister.

    Cutting the circulation of Israel Hayom, which is distributed free of charge, would be of clear benefit to Mr Mozes because it is the main competitor of his newspaper in the battle for advertising revenues.

    The conversation is reported to have taken place several months ago, although the precise date is unknown. Reports suggest the recording was made by Mr Mozes.

    Mr Netanyahu is already under investigation for alleged corruption relating to receiving illegal gifts and donations. He has disputed the allegations and his lawyer said receiving gifts from friends is not illegal.

    The Prime Minister is accused of accepting thousands of pounds worth of gifts, including cigars and champagne, from Israeli billionaire Hollywood producer Arnon Milchan. Reports suggest Mr Netanyahu lobbied US Secretary of State John Kerry on Mr Milchan’s behalf while the producer was attempting to acquire a new US visa.

    Mr Netanyahu has denied the allegations. Sources said he told his ministers: “This is wrong, incessant pressure from the media on law enforcement. They release balloons and the hot air comes out of them time after time. That will be the case here too.”

    Israeli news outlets quoted Mr Netanyahu’s lawyer, Yaakov Weinroth, as saying:  “Any reasonable person knows that there is nothing remotely criminal involved when a close friend gives his friend a gift of cigars.”

    The Israeli Prime Minister has been interviewed twice by police in the last week and is reported to have been surprised by the evidence against him.

    “He didn’t expect it”, a source who knows the Prime Minister well told Haa’retz.

    The evidence of the conversation between Mr Netanyahu and Mr Mozes is said to have been passed to the Israeli Attorney General, Avichai Mandelblit, by investigators early last year. It is unclear what caused the delay in interviewing Mr Netanyahu, although there are suggestions state prosecutors were not clear whether a deal of the nature allegedly proposed by the Prime Minister was actually illegal.

    The conversation between the pair was reported by Israeli media to have been initiated by Mr Netanyahu in an attempt to convince the newspaper publisher not to print a story about his son, Yair. The nature of the story is unclear.

    Mr Netanyahu is also accused of having accepted a accepted €1 million (£850,000) from Arnaud Mimran, a French businessman currently serving eight years in prison for committing a huge carbon-tax fraud. Mimran claimed during his trial that he had given the money to Mr Netanyahu during the 2009 Israeli election campaign – something the politician has consistently denied.

    Last year a spokesperson for the Israeli Prime Minister said: “Mr. Netanyahu received no prohibited contribution from Mimran. Any other claim is a lie.”

    The Prime Minister did, however, admit accepting $40,000 (£33,000) from Mimran in 2001.

    Following reports last month that investigators had been given permission by Mr Mandelblit to open a formal investigation into Mr Netanyahu, a spokesperson for the Prime Minister told Haaretz the allegations were “all nonsense”.

    He said: “Since Netanyahu’s victory in the last elections and even before, hostile elements have used heroic efforts to attempt to bring about his downfall, with false accusations against him and his family.

    “[The allegation] is absolutely false. There was nothing and there will be nothing.”

    Mr Netanyahu is not the first Israeli prime minister to be accused of corruption and his allies have pointed out that such accusations have often come to nothing. Other charges have been proven, however: Ehud Olmert, for example, is currently serving an 18-month prison sentence after being convicted of breach of trust and bribery. Mr Olmert held office from 2006 to 2009 before giving way to Mr Netanyahu.

  • Civil servant resigns after discussing how to ‘take down pro-Palestine MPs’ with Israeli diplomat Footage secretly recorded by a media outlet appeared to show the civil servant discuss plans to ‘take down’ Tory MP

    Civil servant resigns after discussing how to ‘take down pro-Palestine MPs’ with Israeli diplomat Footage secretly recorded by a media outlet appeared to show the civil servant discuss plans to ‘take down’ Tory MP

    Israel embassy1 1A former Westminster official has resigned after footage emerged appearing to show her discuss “taking down” pro-Palestinian MPs.

    According to Independent Maria Strizzolo, who is a former chief of staff to Conservative MP Robert Halfon, was recorded talking to Israeli embassy official Shai Masot.

    The footage, obtained by Al Jazeera, shows Mr. Masot say: “Can I give you some MPs that I would suggest you would take down?” In response, Ms Strizzolo appears to laugh, before responding: “Well you know, if you look hard enough, I’m sure there is something that they’re trying to hide.”

    Ms. Strizzolo has reportedly now resigned from her post at the Skills Funding Agency.

    Israel’s ambassador to the UK Mark Regev has apologized for Mr. Masot’s comments, describing them as “unacceptable”.

    Labour has demanded an investigation to probe alleged Israeli “interference” in British politics.

    During the conversation between the pair, which took place at the Aubaine restaurant near the Israeli embassy in Kensington, Mr. Masot also described Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson as “an idiot”.

    Ms. Strizzolo told the Mail on Sunday that her conversation with Mr. Masot was “tongue-in-cheek and gossipy”, adding: “Any suggestion that I … could exert the type of influence you are suggesting is risible.”

    She said she knew Mr. Masot “purely socially and as a friend. He is not someone with whom I have ever worked or had any political dealings beyond chatting about politics, as millions of people do, in a social context.”