Category: Regions

  • Iraq Demands “Clear Timeline” for US Withdrawal

    Iraq Demands “Clear Timeline” for US Withdrawal

    by: Robert H. Reid, The Associated Press

        Iraq’s foreign minister insisted Sunday that any security deal with the United States must contain a “very clear timeline” for the departure of U.S. troops. A suicide bomber struck north of Baghdad, killing at least five people including an American soldier.

        Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari told reporters that American and Iraqi negotiators were “very close” to reaching a long-term security agreement that will set the rules for U.S. troops in Iraq after the U.N. mandate expires at the end of the year.

        Zebari said the Iraqis were insisting that the agreement include a “very clear timeline” for the withdrawal of U.S.-led forces, but he refused to talk about specific dates.

        “We have said that this is a condition-driven process,” he added, suggesting that the departure schedule could be modified if the security situation changed.

        But Zebari made clear that the Iraqis would not accept a deal that lacks a timeline for the end of the U.S. military presence.

        “No, no definitely there has to be a very clear timeline,” Zebari replied when asked if the Iraqis would accept an agreement that did not mention dates.

        Differences over a withdrawal timetable have become one of the most contentious issues remaining in the talks, which began early this year. U.S. and Iraqi negotiators missed a July 31 target date for completing the deal, which must be approved by Iraq’s parliament.

        President Bush has steadfastly refused to accept any timetable for bringing U.S. troops home. Last month, however, Bush and Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki agreed to set a “general time horizon” for a U.S. departure.

        Last week, two senior Iraqi officials told The Associated Press that American negotiators had agreement to a formula which would remove U.S. forces from Iraqi cities by June 30, 2009, with all combat troops out of the country by October 2010.

        The last American support troops would leave about three years later, the Iraqis said.

        But U.S. officials insist there is no agreement on specific dates. Both the American and Iraqi officials spoke on condition of anonymity because the talks are ongoing. Iraq’s Shiite-led government believes a withdrawal schedule is essential to win parliamentary approval.

        American officials have been less optimistic because of major differences on key issues including who can authorize U.S. military operations and immunity for U.S. troops from prosecution under Iraqi law.

        The White House said discussions continued on a bilateral agreement and said any timeframe discussed was due to major improvements in security over the past year.

        “We are only now able to discuss conditions-based time horizons because security has improved so much. This would not have been possible 18 months ago,” White House spokesman Gordon Johndroe said Sunday. “We all look forward to the day when Iraqi security forces take the lead on more combat missions, allowing U.S. troops to serve in an overwatch role, and more importantly return home.”

        Iraq’s position in the U.S. talks hardened after a series of Iraqi military successes against Shiite and Sunni extremists in Basra, Baghdad, Mosul and other major cities.

        Violence in Iraq has declined sharply over the past year following a U.S. troop buildup, a Sunni revolt against al-Qaida in Iraq and a Shiite militia cease-fire.

        But attacks continue, raising concern that the militants are trying to regroup.

        The suicide bomber struck Sunday afternoon as U.S. and Iraqi troops were responding to a roadside bombing that wounded an Iraqi in Tarmiyah, 30 miles (50 kilometers) north of Baghdad, the U.S. military said.

        Four Iraqi civilians were killed along with the American soldier, military spokesman Lt. Col. Steve Stover said. Two American soldiers and an Iraqi interpreter were among 24 people wounded.

        No group claimed responsibility for the blast but suicide bombings are the signature attack of al-Qaida in Iraq.

        “This was a heinous attack by al-Qaida in Iraq against an Iraqi family, followed by a cowardly attack against innocent civilians, their security forces and U.S. soldiers,” Stover said.

        Elsewhere, a car bomb exploded outside the Kurdish security department in Khanaqin, 90 miles northeast of Baghdad. At least two people were killed and 25 wounded, including the commander of local Kurdish forces, Lt. Col. Majid Ahmed, police said.

        First reports indicated it was a suicide attack. But the U.S. military later said the bomb was in a white truck filled with watermelons and that witnesses saw the occupants leave the vehicle just before the blast.

        Ethnic tensions have been rising in northern Iraq amid disputes between Kurds, Turkomen and mostly Sunni Arabs over Kurdish demands to annex the oil-rich city of Kirkuk into their self-ruled region.

        Sawarah Ghalib, 25, who was wounded in the blast, said he believed military operations under way south of the city in Diyala province had pushed insurgents into the Khanaqin area.

        “I did not expect that a terrorist attack to take place in our secure town,” Ghalib said from his bed in the Khanaqin hospital. “Al-Qaida is to blame for this attack. Operations in Diyala have pushed them here.”

        In Baghdad, six people were killed in a series of bombings on the first day of the Iraqi work week.

        The deadliest blast occurred about 8:15 a.m. in a crowded area where people wait for buses in the capital’s mainly Shiite southeastern district of Kamaliya. Four people were killed, including a woman and her brother, and 11 others wounded, according to police.

        A car bomb later exploded as an Iraqi army patrol transporting money to a state-run bank passed by in Baghdad’s central Khillani square, killing two people including an Iraqi soldier and wounding nine other people, a police officer said.

        Another Iraqi soldier was killed and five were wounded by a car bomb in Salman Pak, about 15 miles south of Baghdad, police said.

        ——–

        Associated Press writers Hamza Hendawi, Kim Gamel and Sameer N. Yacoub in Baghdad and Yahya Barzanji in Sulaimaniyah contributed to this report.

  • Turkey walks tightrope over Iran ties

    Turkey walks tightrope over Iran ties


    By Paul de Bendern
    Reuters
    Tuesday, August 12, 2008; 9:13 AM

     

    ISTANBUL (Reuters) – A visit by Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to Turkey on Thursday reflects a desire by the NATO member to remain on good terms with an unpredictable neighbor and secure future energy needs.

    President Abdullah Gul and Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan have come under criticism at home and abroad for inviting Ahmadinejad, a visit that marks a diplomatic coup for the firebrand leader who has been shunned by European countries.

    Ankara has said his visit was necessary given the standoff between Iran and the West over Tehran’s disputed nuclear enrichment program, and offered to help resolve the dispute.

    But analysts said the trip was more about ensuring centuries-old ties during a period of global tensions.

    “Although Turkey doesn’t like the present regime it has always tried to keep Iranians both at bay and collaborate with them. It is an extremely delicate balancing act and it will continue to be so,” said Cengiz Aktar, a political scientist at Istanbul’s Bahcesehir University.

    “The visit is all about controlled risks and the most important aspect is a gas deal with Iran, not the nuclear program because Turkey has little influence on that,” he said.

    Turkey and Iran share a border dating to a 1639 peace treaty.

    Ahmadinejad has been courting Turkey in the past few years as the United States has stepped up efforts to isolate Iran for failing to halt its disputed nuclear enrichment program. Washington sees the president’s visit as undermining such moves. Israel, another ally of Turkey, has also criticized the visit.

    Gul and Erdogan — both founders of the Islamist-rooted ruling AK Party — have pushed to boost Turkey’s position in the Middle East region, building greater ties with neighboring countries than previous governments.

    TRADE TIES

    Though Iran and Turkey are close geographically, historically and culturally, they have remained distant in policy and direction since the Iranian revolution in 1979.

    Turkey, which is seeking European Union membership, is also concerned at the repercussions were the United States or Israel to strike the Islamic Republic.

    “Ankara definitely does not sympathize with the ‘theodemocracy’ (theocracy-partial democracy) of Iran. … But not having a hostile attitude against Iran is important for Turkey’s domestic stability as well as its energy needs,” said Sahin Alpay, a columnist for conservative daily Zaman.

    Turkey is entirely dependent on energy imports to quench its increasing thirst for oil and gas as its industry expands. Iran is currently its second biggest supplier of gas after Russia.

    Bilateral trade reached $5 billion in the first half of 2008 and Turkey has pledged to invest $3.5 billion in Iranian gas production. Ankara and Tehran signed a memorandum of understanding but are yet to sign a comprehensive agreement to invest in Iran’s South Pars gas field project.

    Part of that deal agreement may be signed on Thursday.

    Turkey is also a major transit route for goods between the European Union and Iran.

    Turkey, an officially secular but predominantly Sunni Muslim country, has long been wary over Shi’ite Tehran’s effort to export its style of Islamic Republic, its meddling in the region and its true intentions regarding its nuclear program.

    Iran has on the other hand resented Turkey’s Western orientation and reluctance to back Tehran against U.S. and EU pressure, now in the form of economic sanctions.

    News reports that Ahmadinejad did not wish to visit the tomb of Turkey’s revered founder Mustafa Kemal Ataturk in Ankara have caused a stir. Protocol requires foreign leaders to visit the mausoleum and Turkish media said Gul had subsequently moved the trip to Istanbul to avoid a potential embarrassing moment.

    While tensions have simmered from time to time each country clearly recognizes they have mutual interests.

    Tehran’s help in tackling Kurdish separatists based in northern Iraq has also boosted bilateral ties with Turkey, to the dismay of Washington, which until recently offered little help in moving against Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK) bases.

    “Will the visit really help Turkey? I doubt it. It’s more beneficial for Ahmadinejad. He’ll get another 15 minutes in the spotlight when he unleashes his trademark attacks against Israel and the United States,” said a senior EU diplomat.

    (Editing by Mary Gabriel)

  • Olympics Expose the Total Hypocrisy of U.S. Immigration Laws

    Olympics Expose the Total Hypocrisy of U.S. Immigration Laws

    By Sally Kohn, Movement Vision Lab
    Posted on August 11, 2008, Printed on August 12, 2008

    I have to confess I’ve never really cared about the Olympics. Since I’m not much for sports or raw nationalism, the fusion of the two doesn’t really get me up in the morning. But I will tune in tonight to watch Lopez Lomong — Sudanese “Lost Boy” turned U.S. track star — carry the American flag in the opening ceremonies. I’m sure I’ll have a tear in my eye, but also a twinge in my stomach for the profound irony of the moment. Some might even call it hypocrisy.

    For here we are in the United States, where though the price of gas is skyrocketing, there seems to be endless fuel to feed the fires of anti-immigrant sentiment. But the Olympics are different, I guess. Is it the same with professional sports? Or the governorship of California? We don’t like immigrants in low-wage jobs that none of us citizens want to do, but we don’t mind immigrants in the exceptionally high-paying jobs that American-born citizens can only dream of?

    What’s the point complaining about an undocumented Mexican making $5 an hour in a chicken processing plant, who lost two of his fingers because of unsafe conditions and labor violations? Shouldn’t we be more upset about Yao Ming making $15 million a year, plus endorsements?

    Ah, but in America, we have a long and proud tradition of picking on the little guy. We also have a proud tradition of taking half-hearted moral stands. (Remember the Southern Compromise, anyone? Our continuing tolerance of segregation after abolition? Or the Bush Administration’s rejection of nation-building … ?) Why bother standing up for what’s right when we can just talk about what we know is right but then just keep doing what we’ve always done.

    Of course I don’t want the anti-immigrant hate spewers to wizen up to their inconsistencies and expel the 33 immigrants on the U.S. Olympic team this year, let alone a vast number of our nation’s doctors, nurses, engineers — and one governor. But on the other hand, it would be refreshing if the anti-immigrant fanatics would just level with us — and chant “Run home immigrant” at Lopez Lomong during his 1500 meter dash, as opposed to just chanting at the far less fortunate and far more desperate undocumented migrants who are just trying to get to work to make a day’s pay. After all, factory workers and maids and farmworkers are easy targets. Let’s see the anti-immigrant folks really test their theories and tirades by attacking people Americans really care about.

    Because while Lou Dobbs and others will say it’s just undocumented immigrants they mean to attack, it’s not true. Accusations against undocumented immigrants also stick to legal immigrants and naturalized citizens, especially those from Latin America — because we don’t make much distinction between undocumented Latino immigrants working crappy jobs for crappy wages and permanent resident or naturalized Latino immigrants working crappy jobs for crappy wages. When Pat Buchanan says on Fox News, “You’ve got a wholesale invasion, the greatest invasion in human history, coming across your southern border, changing the composition and character of your country,” he’s not exactly distinguishing, is he?

    And attacks against undocumented immigrants promote attacks against all immigrants. Recall after September 11th how Bush Administration rhetoric against “Muslim terrorists” led to a rise in hate crimes against Muslim and Arab gas station attendants, taxi cab drivers and other law-abiding immigrants and citizens. Lopez Lomong and Yao Ming had better stay alert.

    In our two-tiered America — with a persistent and wide gulf between the rich and the poor, those with power and those who are struggling, those who have every opportunity in life and those who have none — is it any wonder we have a two-tiered take on immigration? In an America where we forgive Lindsay Lohan for repeated cocaine abuse but throw the book at poor African American men for even the most minor offenses, in an America where we give huge tax breaks to Wal-Mart and Exxon but refuse to raise funding for food stamps, is it any wonder we attack low-wage undocumented workers at the bottom of our society while celebrating immigrant athletes at the top?

    You might be thinking, “But Lopez Lomong had a talent. He was a gifted runner and because of that our country rescued him from the violence and poverty of the Sudan.” That’s right. We’re America. We give everyone a chance. Tonight we’ll be celebrating what Lomong made of his opportunity. But let’s not forget all the immigrants that we’re denying an opportunity to.

    Sally Kohn is the director of the Movement Vision Project of the Center for Community Change, which is interviewing hundreds of activists across the country to determine the progressive vision for the future of the United States.

    © 2008 Movement Vision Lab All rights reserved.
    View this story online at:
  • Osetia :No need to panic over every regional crisis

    Osetia :No need to panic over every regional crisis

     

    Osetia Hakkinda TDN’de Ilter Turkmen’in bir yazisi, arz edilir.

    No need to panic over every regional crisis

    Tuesday, August 12, 2008

    Georgia is hopeful that the West could take action if the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan oil pipeline is threatened. But there is a slim chance that Russia would do that

    İlter TÜRKMEN
      As does the Middle East, the Caucasus always fluctuates in instability. And there is no sign that the instability will come to an end soon. At the origin of many crises structural elements, historic and religious rivalry, power imbalance, and a race in regional population increases play a key role. Some of these crises are due to unfortunate occupations by external forces, as in Iraq.

      

      All these boils undoubtedly affect Turkey in various ways because of the country’s geopolitical position. Turkey, however, has to experience this environment of tension whether we like it or not. Turkey can play mediator in some of the conflicts, though limited, but it cannot in some others.

      

      West has not much to say:

      
    Plus, Turkey is not always a neutral actor; for instance interests of the country can be in accord with several parties and in conflict with others, considering the developments affecting Iraq and Georgia. We should always keep in mind that Turkish politics are not as flexible as they are supposed to be and where we fail in solving our own problems, cannot overcome crises in internal politics do not leave much space for foreign policies.
    It’s been asserted that the latest skirmishes that have erupted between Georgia and Russia can spread and that the United States and the European Union cannot leave a country that affects the energy security of both against Russia. But it is obvious from the beginning that the West has not much to say in this crisis and it cannot engage in military encounters against Russia. Although the U.S. and Russia fiercely accuse each other at the United Nations Security Council, the council cannot reach a decision due to the Russian veto power.
      Besides, no one can deny that Georgia makes an arithmetical mistake by engaging in a war with a country – Russia — stronger than itself. In the end, Georgia lost so many of its citizens to war as many left the country and had to withdraw forces from South Ossetia. Former Russian President Vladimir Putin said integration between Georgia and South Ossetia is impossible from now on; in other words, current borders will be permanent. As I write this piece, Russia was still bombarding the Georgian targets, not complying with ceasefire and keeping the Abkhazia coasts under control.
      Apparently, Georgia is hopeful that the West could take action if the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan oil pipeline is threatened. But there is a slim chance that Russia would want to ruin this international pipeline. Although plans to make Georgia a NATO member is one of the key reasons why Russia has reacted against Georgia, one cannot say that Russia wants to cause a big crisis in U.S.-EU relations because these ties are economically and politically vital for both parties. As a matter of fact, it has been crystal-clear that U.S. aspiration to make Georgia and Ukraine NATO members is not realistic and off target.
    What can Turkey do?
      What can Turkey do? It continues to call the sides to calm down and seek reconciliation. But it is less likely that Turkey, as a NATO member, can act as a facilitator between Russia and Georgia. However, it could be profitable for Turkey to reexamine its Caucasus policy. Unless the Karabakh issue is settled, we may face a many more dangerous hot encounters. At least signing an agreement to open the Turkey-Armenia border is extremely beneficial. Policies to create an environment for settlement can bring stability to the Caucasus, as they certainly help balancing out the Russian influence in the region.
      Obviously we should be very careful not to let these policies negatively affect our bilateral relations with Russia. Unfortunately, stability and peace in the Caucasus have turned very fragile after the Cold War. Going through the same process the Balkans are pulling themselves through. Though this is a different equation, it is time for the countries in the Caucasus to seek more realistic and constructive objectives. 

    © 2005 Dogan Daily News Inc. www.turkishdailynews.com.tr

     

  • Iraq and Turkey: Regional cooperation will change the region

    Iraq and Turkey: Regional cooperation will change the region

     

    Agustos 12, 2008 tarihli bir TDN makalesi: Ilginize

     

    Tuesday, August 12, 2008

    While Iraq is in great pain because our eastern neighbor has decided to follow Saddam’s path to nihilism, our northern neighbor extends a hopeful hand of friendship, trust and promising prosperity

    Hussain SINJARI
      The last visit by a Turkish PM to our country was in 1990. Eighteen years later, a different Turkish PM comes to Baghdad. Recep Tayyip Erdoğan is Islamic yet secular, a modern and open-minded leader who considers the sacred texts to be good for worshipping, more of cultural or spiritual values rather than to do with strategy, economics or the administration of the state. Moreover, he and his party do not interfere in the lifestyle of the people or their choices of belief. He and his party respect the individual freedoms of women and men.
      The government of our country did very well when it received our guest and his delegation in the most welcoming way Baghdad has ever seen so far. This visit made history when both sides signed “The Iraqi-Turkish High Strategic Cooperation Counci,” which is due to meet three times a year chaired by both PMs. The sectors of the cooperation are vitally important and include energy, military industry, security and politics.

    A historic visit:

      We know this historic visit was the fruit of good efforts of both President Jalal Talabani and Prime Minister Nori al Maliki. It came after the obvious success on the ground of the latest military/security operations in different places in Basrah, Baghdad, Ramadi, Mosul and elsewhere where criminal gangs used to terrorize the civilians.

      The visit of Erdoğan could not possibly take place without this security success. The writer of this article is a witness to this improvement through a number of tours and walks during the day and night in Baghdad. In Abu Nawas, the famous Baghdadi avenue with cafes and restaurants on the bank of the River Tigris, universally known for its “mesguf,” or grilled fish, I was very surprised to see hundreds of families out there. A private security company, The Sandi Group, is in charge of the security of the place, checking cars, watching for terrorists and keeping order.

      Turkey is a semi-European country with its democratically elected parliament; free, independent and critical media; active and genuine civil society organizations; and the progress it has made in the fields of agriculture, industry, education, tourism or services. All of this and more shall help to create a unique regional cooperation between Turkey and our country, which has the largest oil reserve in the world and the best human resources in the Middle East. Yet, due to the long decades of dictatorship under which we wasted our national wealth on armaments, the liberation of Palestine, lies of propaganda and other destructive practices, our country is almost a wasteland. This is a sad reality but must be changed. To change it we need this kind of strategic regional cooperation to put energies together to rebuild and reconstruct.

      The Kurdish element:

      Along the Iraqi-Turkish border, the Kurdish people live. This existence could be of a great help and serve as “the bridge” between Turkey and Iraq. The armed insurgency must come to an end and people must follow civilized practices and methods to express themselves, demand rights and demonstrate grievances.  The “State” is not innocent and policies must be revised. And people listened to and cared for. 

      The Turkomen in Iraq and Arabs in Turkey are other examples that diversity could and should be an element for strength and wealth.

      While Iraq is in great pain because our eastern neighbor has decided to follow Saddam’s path to nihilism, our northern neighbor extends a hopeful hand of friendship, trust and promising prosperity.

    Basrah-Istanbul railway system:

      Here I come up with my proposal to both governments of Iraq and Turkey: Put as a top priority to run a most technologically modern and monumental railway between Basrah and Istanbul. And then a very modern highway for transport trucks and personal cars to connect Basrah to Istanbul. These two giant projects will attract large companies to invest while small businesses will flourish along the rail and the highway.

      In this way, Iraq will be linked to Europe via Istanbul and Turkey will be linked to the Gulf via Basrah.

      One does not need more than a glance to realize what a creation of wealth this should bring to the people of the two countries and for beyond — the Gulf and Europe.

      In our globalized world we need more “tolerancy diplomacy.” This new approach and concept means to find out common grounds according to mutual benefits regardless of differences in faiths, ideologies, ethnic or linguistic backgrounds. Iraq and Turkey and other states should explore the benefits of the acceptance of each other and recognition of each other’s rights. This is an application of the “The Turkish-Iraqi High Strategic Cooperation” to set an example for many others who are crippled by the evils of ideology.  

      ………

      Hussain Sinjari is an Iraqi commentator based in Baghdad and the president of Tolerancy International. (www.tolerancy.org)

       

    © 2005 Dogan Daily News Inc. www.turkishdailynews.com.tr

     

  • Armenia Rules Out Support For Russian Strikes On Georgia

    Armenia Rules Out Support For Russian Strikes On Georgia

     

     

     

     

     

    By Emil Danielyan

    Defense Minister Seyran Ohanian assured a senior Georgian diplomat on Tuesday Russia did not and will not use Armenian territory for its ongoing military operations in Georgia condemned by the West.

    Armenia maintains close defense links with Russia and hosts a Russian military base numbering several thousand soldiers and a dozen MiG-29 fighter jets.

    The Defense Ministry in Yerevan flatly denied late last week Azerbaijani and Georgian media claims that some of the Russian warplanes involved in bomb raids on Georgia flew in from Armenian military airfields. A ministry spokesman rejected the allegations as an Azerbaijani “provocation” designed to damage Georgian-Armenian relations. He argued that the Russian military is not using MiG-29s in the air strikes.

    Georgia’s ambassador to Armenia, Revaz Gachechiladze, commented the allegations, not echoed by the Georgian government, at a meeting with Ohanian. A statement by the Defense Ministry quoted Gachechiladze as stating that the Russian military aircraft stationed in Armenia has not been involved in the Russian onslaught.

    “For his part, S. Ohanian assured the ambassador that Armenia’s territory will not be used as a military launch pad for hostilities against Georgia, expressing hope that ways will be found to normalize the situation in Georgia,” the statement said. Ohanian also offered his sympathy for “innocent victims” of the nearly week-long fighting, it added.

    The statement claimed that Gachechiladze requested the meeting in order to introduce Georgia’s new military attaché in Yerevan, Colonel Murtaz Gujejiani, to the Armenian defense chief.

    Armenia is treading carefully on the Russian-Georgian conflict, mindful of the two countries’ importance for its national security. The Armenian Foreign Ministry expressed on Friday serious concern about the outbreak of fighting in South Ossetia but avoided blaming any of the parties for the worst regional crisis since the early 1990s. Official Yerevan has so far not reacted on Russian forces’ subsequent advance deep into Georgian territory, which has been condemned by the United States and other Western powers.

    The Armenian government also refuted on Tuesday other media reports saying that it allowed a planeload of U.S. military instructors bound for Georgia to land in Yerevan’s Zvartnots international airport. Deputy Foreign Minister Gegham Gharibjanian said special flights to Zvartnots have been carried out only by planes that were sent by some European governments to collect their citizens evacuated from Georgia.