Category: Regions

  • Turkey accepts Russian bid for nuclear

    Turkey accepts Russian bid for nuclear

    ANKARA, Turkey, Sept. 25 (UPI) — The only firm to respond to Turkey’s tender for bids for a nuclear plant will be assessed.

    Only one firm, Russia-based Atomstroyexport, submitted an offer for the construction and operation of Turkey’s first nuclear power plant, Anatolia news agency reported.

    The Turkish Electricity Trading and Contracting Co. Inc. held its fourth tender process in Ankara Wednesday for the construction and operation of a nuclear power plant in the Akkuyu region of the southern province of Mersin.

    In the first three tenders, TETC received no bids and was not able to move forward with its controversial plans for a nuclear plant.

    After receiving an offer from Atomstroyexport, Turkey’s Atomic Energy Agency will assess the offer and review the company. If Turkey accepts the bid, it will move on to Turkey’s Council of Ministers for their approval.

    Atomstroyexport, AECL Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd., Suez Tractebel, Unit Investment N.V., Hattat Holding-Hema Ortak Girisim Grubu and Ak Enerji all submitted closed envelopes, but only Russian Atomstroyexport’s envelope included an offer.

  • Gazprom ups gas price for Armenia

    Gazprom ups gas price for Armenia

    MOSCOW, Sept. 25 (UPI) — Russian energy giant Gazprom will increase the price of gas exported to Armenia by 40 percent beginning in April 2009, officials said Thursday.

    Karen Karapetian with the joint Russian-Armenian natural gas pipeline project ArmRosGazprom said starting April 1 the price for gas would increase from $110 per 1,000 cubic meters to $154.

    Another price increase, to $200 per 1,000 cubic meters, is scheduled to go into effect in 2010, and in 2011, Gazprom will peg the price to conditions in Europe, the Azeri Press Agency said.

    Earlier, Azerbaijan denied reports there were plans to alter the route of the Western-backed Nabucco pipeline through Armenian territory, citing a territorial dispute between the two countries.

    On Tuesday, however, Iran pledged to meet Armenian winter energy demands through a $220 million, 87-mile natural gas pipeline.

    “Iran will pump 3 million cubic meters of gas to Armenia during this winter,” said Reza Kasaei Zadeh, director of the Iranian Gas Export Co.

  • Armenia Strives to Maintain Balanced Foreign Policy

    Armenia Strives to Maintain Balanced Foreign Policy

    Yerevan to host NATO exercises as it chairs Russian-backed security body.

    By Ara Tadevosian in Yerevan (CRS 461 25-Sep-08)

    The August war between Armenia’s close ally Russia and close neighbour Georgia rocked its foreign policy of “complementarity”, but analysts say President Serzh Sarkisian is working hard on maintaining a balance between Russia and the West.

    Following Moscow’s recognition of the independence of Abkhazia and South Ossetia on August 26, the Russian leadership sought the support of its allies in the Commonwealth of Independent States Collective Security Pact, of which Armenia is now the chairman, signalling that it wanted them to follow the Russian lead over the two territories.

    But two days before the members of the security pact were due to meet in Moscow, Sarkisian made it clear that he would not be recognising the two breakaway territories.

    On September 3, Sarkisian told foreign diplomats in Yerevan, “Armenia cannot recognise the independence of Abkhazia and South Ossetia, not having recognised the independence of Nagorny Karabakh.”

    The Nagorny Karabakh Republic, which declared independence in December 1991, is strongly supported by Armenia but not recognised as an independent state by it, or any other country.

    One senior western diplomat in Yerevan described Sarkisian’s statement as an “elegant move”, to get himself out of a serious dilemma.

    Fyodor Lukyanov, editor-in-chief of the journal Russia in Global Politics, told IWPR, “They understand in the Kremlin that this is a very serious issue. Armenia is in an especially delicate position because of the problem of Karabakh. I don’t believe Moscow will put pressure on Yerevan.”

    Analysts say that Armenia was put in a tricky position by the crisis but is hoping to manoeuvre out of it and not alienate any of the country’s partners.

    “Armenia will not have to make a decisive choice and to ‘swear on its blood’ its loyalty to one or other partner,” said Lukyanov.

    “On the other hand Russia of course demonstrated a new kind of behaviour [during the August crisis] and will try to consolidate its sphere of influence, something which will objectively lead to greater rivalry for the post-Soviet space and for the Caucasus.

    “Russia has never concealed that it thinks of politics in this part of the world as highly competitive. Basically, the United States has thrown off appearances and adopted the same position.”

    From the American side, Ron Asmus, director of the Transatlantic Centre of the German Marshall Fund in Brussels, said, “It may well become harder for Armenia to maintain the balance it seeks to achieve in its policy of complementarity.

    “But it won’t be the US that will pressure Armenia to make any choice. We will respect the choice of Armenia and defend its right to decide where it wants to belong.”

    Armenia relies on both Russia, its main trading partner, and Georgia, its main transit route to the outside world, for economic survival and the war hit the Armenian economy very hard.

    The blowing up of a railway bridge in central Georgia on August 16 disrupted trade to Armenia and caused two weeks of fuel shortages.

    Around 70 per cent of imports to Armenia come through the Georgian port of Poti, which was occupied by Russian forces during the conflict, while land connections to Russia via Georgia have been severely restricted for almost two years.

    In mid-August, in the midst of the Georgia crisis, Sarkisian told his security council that Russia is a “strategic ally” of Armenia, while Georgia is a “friendly country”, indicating his strategic preference while aiming not to offend either.

    Interestingly, Armenian opposition leader and former president Levon Ter-Petrosian has taken an openly pro-Russian position during the crisis.

    “No one can dispute that it was Georgia who unleashed the war and did it with the aim of liquidating the Republic of South Ossetia,” said Ter-Petrosian in an interview to the A1+ internet news site. “No one can also dispute that by its decisive intervention, Russia saved the South Ossetian people from genocide. If Russia had delayed its assistance even by six hours, South Ossetia would not exist today.”

    Alexander Iskandarian, director of the Caucasus Media Institute, said that he did not expect Georgian-Armenian relations to suffer, despite the identification of Armenia with Russia. He said that the tensions between the two countries were typical of neighbours and the leaders on both sides were able to stop them deteriorating.

    On taking on the chairmanship of the CIS Collective Security Pact, Sarkisian also hinted at unhappiness with other members of the organisation. Without naming them, he appeared to be referring to Kazakstan and Uzbekistan which have given support to Azerbaijan.

    The word complementarity was coined in 1998 when Sarkisian’s predecessor, Robert Kocharian, was elected president to describe the country’s policy of staying friends with its military ally, Russia, and the United States, which has a large Armenian diaspora as well as Europe and Iran.

    One of the main aims of the policy of complementarity is to avoid “putting all your eggs in one basket”. One consequence of this is that, despite the downturn in relations between Russia and the West and the virtual suspension of the Russia-NATO council, Armenia is pressing ahead with NATO exercises later this month as part of the Partnership for Peace programme.

    The Cooperative Longbow/Lancer exercises will take place in Armenia from September 26 to October 21 and will be the biggest ever such NATO exercise to be held in the South Caucasus.

    Around 1,100 soldiers will take part from 21 countries from NATO, its partners and also the United Arab Emirates.

    Western officials and analysts say that it is unfair to force Armenia to make a choice in its foreign policy.

    US deputy assistant secretary of state Matt Bryza told the Armenian news agency Mediamax, “Armenia is an independent country with a sovereign government elected by its citizens. It can pursue any path it wishes. The United States is a close friend of Armenia’s, and remains committed to helping Armenia achieve the goals of its complementarity foreign policy.”

    Ruben Safrastian, director of Armenia’s Institute of Oriental Studies, noted that one consequence of the American-Russian stand-off in the Caucasus was Turkey’s new initiative for a Caucasus Stability and Cooperation Platform, currently being presented at the United Nations General Assembly, which Moscow had endorsed more enthusiastically than Washington.

    Safrastian said that because it saw itself as having a stronger position in the South Caucasus, Moscow did not see the possible normalisation of Armenian-Turkish relations as a threat and would be supporting this process.

    Ara Tadevosian is director of Mediamax news agency in Yerevan.

  • Even the UN’s Immunity Has Limits (Lawyer for the victims of Srebrenica)

    Even the UN’s Immunity Has Limits (Lawyer for the victims of Srebrenica)

    Axel Hagedorn, 53, is a German lawyer representing nearly 6,000 relatives of the victims of the 1995 Srebrenica massacre. He spoke with SPIEGEL about a Dutch court’s recent ruling that the Netherlands couldn’t be held accountable for the deaths and his intention to sue at the European level.

    German lawyer Axel Hagedorn (left) walks with a relative of a victim of the Srebrenica massacre outside The Hague.

    SPIEGEL: Last week, the district court in The Hague threw out the claim of the relatives of four Bosnians who were killed by Serbs in the 1995 Srebrenica massacre. In all 8,000 people were killed. Dutch United Nations peacekeeping troops led by Thomas Karremans allowed the Serbs to enter the safe haven, but no one will be held accountable now. Does this mean the case is closed?

    Axel Hagedorn: Quite the contrary. Srebrenica was the largest massacre in Europe since World War II, and it will also enable us to answer the question of whether the United Nations is above all laws. At the end of the day, the UN’s credibility is at stake. The most recent decision dealt solely with the fate of individuals; lawyers from another law firm had brought a case exclusively directed at the Dutch state. The court ruled that the Dutch were not responsible because their soldiers were under the command of the UN. That was an easy call for the judge.

    SPIEGEL: How do you intend to make it harder on them?

    Hagedorn: We represent 6,000 relatives, which means that it involves almost all the massacre’s victims. For this reason, the issue of genocide will be put on the table as well. Above all, we aren’t just suing the Netherlands — we’re also going after the United Nations.

     

    SPIEGEL: The same court brushed you off two months ago. Its main argument was that people can’t bring a case against the UN because it has secured immunity for itself in its own charter.

    Hagedorn: These two verdicts in such a short space of time have made everyone realize that it would be perverse if all those involved were deprived of justice. And they won’t be able to, either, because there is a limit to the UN’s immunity. If the participation of UN soldiers in an act of genocide doesn’t cross this line, then tell me what does.

    SPIEGEL: But the UN has never been prosecuted in court.

    Hagedorn: The UN safeguarded itself with immunity in its 1946 “Convention on Privileges,” but at the same time it also committed itself to establishing its own jurisdiction. Over the last 62 years, it has utterly failed to do so.

     

    SPIEGEL: Do you believe that the UN can be forced to make up for that?

    Hagedorn: We first need to follow through with the legal process at the national level, with an appeal and a review. Then, if necessary, we can go before the European Court of Human Rights. For the judges there, we have a clearly defined question: Does the UN also enjoy absolute immunity in cases of genocide so long as it has failed to establish an alternative legal procedure? We might not win the case in the Netherlands, but we will on the European level.

    Spiegel 09/17/2008

    Interview conducted by Clemens Höges.

  • Germany says U.S. to lose financial superpower status

    Germany says U.S. to lose financial superpower status

    By Noah Barkin Reuters

    BERLIN (Reuters) – Germany blamed the Anglo-Saxon capitalist model on Thursday for spawning the global financial crisis, saying the United States would lose its financial superpower status and have to accept greater market regulation.

    In unusually stark language, German Finance Minister Peer Steinbrueck told parliament the financial crisis would leave “deep marks” and proposed eight measures to address it, including a ban on speculative short-selling and an increase in bank capital requirements to offset credit risks.

    “The world will never be as it was before the crisis,” Steinbrueck, a deputy leader of the centre-left Social Democrats, told the Bundestag lower house.

    “The United States will lose its superpower status in the world financial system. The world financial system will become more multi-polar,” he said.

    Steinbrueck lay the blame for the crisis squarely on the United States and what he called an Anglo-Saxon drive for double-digit profits and massive bonuses for bankers and company executives.

    “Investment bankers and politicians in New York, Washington and London were not willing to give these up,” he said. “Wall Street will never be what it was.”

    The collapse of U.S. investment bank Lehman Brothers and financial woes of other financial institutions like insurer AIG has prompted the U.S. government to unveil a $700 billion rescue package for the country’s financial sector.

    Steinbrueck said it was neither necessary nor wise for Germany to replicate the U.S. plan for its own institutions.

    The German Bundesbank said earlier this week that the financial market turbulence would hit the earnings of Germany’s big commercial lenders, its publicly-owned Landesbanks and its cooperative banks.

    Tighter credit in the wake of the crisis could also constrain household consumption and corporate investment, increasing the likelihood the German economy will fall into recession this year.

    But Steinbrueck said German regulator Bafin believed German banks could cope with losses and ensure the safety of private savings.

    He said the crisis showed the need for a greater state role in setting the rules for markets and called the turmoil primarily an American problem.

    “The financial crisis is above all an American problem. The other G7 financial ministers in continental Europe share this opinion,” he said.

    “This system, which is to a large degree insufficiently regulated, is now collapsing — with far-reaching consequences for the U.S. financial market and considerable contagion effects for the rest of the world,” Steinbrueck added.

    (Reporting by Noah Barkin and Kerstin Gehmlich)

    Source: uk.news.yahoo.com, 24 September 2008

  • US Navy Azerbaijani officer: “We are always concerning over the occupation of Azerbaijani lands” – EXCLUSIVE

    US Navy Azerbaijani officer: “We are always concerning over the occupation of Azerbaijani lands” – EXCLUSIVE


      Slideshow
    <
    1 / 3
    >

     
     

    [ 19 Sep 2008 12:58 ]
    Washington. Husniyya Hasanova –APA. US Navy officer Naimi Amiraliyev’s interview with APA

    -How did the young man, born in Nehram Village, rise to the rank of US Navy officer?

    -I was born in 1977 in Nehram Village of Babak Region, Azerbaijan. I have lived in Nakhchivan City since the age of six and graduated from the secondary school there. I became the student of Baku State University and in 1998 graduated from the University’s History School. I went to the United States to receive Master’s degree and received two scientific degrees in economy and political relations. I worked for short time in the New York-based Energy Research and Development Department. After September 11 events, I decided, as a new US citizen, to make my contribution to the war on terrorism like other Americans. I took the military service in 2002. I started the service as a mariner. After the graduation from the high military school in 2005 I was appointed as an officer by the President George Bush’s order. I am a senior lieutenant now.

    -There are many Azerbaijanis working in the different posts in the USA. Some of them are avoiding the Diaspora activity under the pretence of heavy working schedule. But despite that you are military serviceman you are demonstrating great activeness in the Diaspora activities. What can you say about that?

    -I am looking at the Diaspora activity not as routine practice. The Diaspora is native for me like my family, my nation and traditions. We are always concerning about the occupation of 20 per cent of Azerbaijani lands and nearly one million Azerbaijani refugees and IDPs. My parents are living under the occupation. I deem it duty to work for Diaspora because of my loyalty to my nation and our traditions.

    -5 congressmen joined the working group on Azerbaijan on your initiative. What can the close ties with the congressmen give us?

    -Azerbaijani Diaspora should work in several directions. First is the recognition of Azerbaijan and our people. Besides, it is important to proclaim our just work in America. On the other hand, it should be taken into consideration that the White House, Department of State and Congress determine the foreign policy of the United States. Executive bodies mainly ensure strategic interests of the state, while the members of the Congress prefer the interests of the communities of the district they have been elected from. That’s why each congressman determines his position in accordance with the demographic breakdown of the district he represents. Sometimes, we witness some congressmen’s statements against strategic interests of America. Alongside with the executive body, we should do our best for prevention of the decisions against Azerbaijan in the Congress, protection of our just work, return of our occupied territories and assistance to Azerbaijan. As you know, nowhere else in the world there is analogue of Armenia’s invasion. This invasion is even justified in some big states.

    -As far as we know, you often go to the meetings with the Congress members along with your family? What is its advantage?

    -Like most people I pay special attention to family friendship. Most of Americans are family men and take warmer approach to the persons having paragon families. But there is also another message here. I want to demonstrate how developed and civilized the Azerbaijan’s society is. Ill-willers usually try to introduce our society as a backward one, where men dominate in the families and women have no rights. Seeing a family with a western style of thinking from a Muslim country, U.S. congressmen gain right impression of our country. My wife Naila and three-month son Kamal are essential support for me.

    -How do you assess the activity of our diplomatic missions in the US?

    -We have good relations with other members of our Diaspora and Azerbaijan’s diplomatic missions. Owing to the rapid development of Azerbaijan, our country’s bilateral relations with the US have extended much more. In this respect, I would like to note Azerbaijan’s consulate opened in Los Angeles. As far as I know, Azerbaijan’s consulate in California is carrying out serious activities and achieving positive results. Besides, Azerbaijan’s embassy in Washington is one of the most active foreign missions there.

    -Are you going to join the U.S. politics in future?

    -Time will show…