Category: Regions

  • Turkish army to transfer attacked stations, bombs PKK posts in N.Iraq

    Turkish army to transfer attacked stations, bombs PKK posts in N.Iraq

    Turkish warplanes hit outlawed PKK positions in northern Iraq on Saturday. Meanwhile, Ankara and military officials on Sunday warned the Kurdish administration in its southeastern neighbor to tackle the terrorist organization.

    The Turkish military says warplanes have bombed PKK separatist’s bases in northern Iraq, the General Staff said in a statement posted on its website.
     
     The bombs hit Iraq’s Avasin Basyan region on Saturday after the PKK attack that killed 15 Turkish soldiers on Friday, but added that no ground troops entered Iraq, the statement said, adding that the air raids only targeted the PKK bases and that the necessary precautions were shown to avoid civilian casualties.

     General Hasan Igsiz, the army’s deputy chief, called the press briefing after 15 Turkish soldiers were killed when a group of PKK separatists crossed into Turkey from their long-time bases in northern Iraq and attacked a border outpost under cover of heavy weapons fire from northern Iraq.

     Igsiz accused the leaders of northern Iraq of tolerating PKK separatists, press representatives joined to the meeting said after the briefing.

     “We have no support at all from the northern Iraqi administration (against the separatists). Let aside any support, they are providing (the separatists with) infrastructural capabilities such as hospitals and roads,” Igsiz quoted as saying at the meeting held at the General Staff Head Quarters in Ankara.

     “Our expectation is that (the PKK) be acknowledged as a terrorist organization there and that support for the separatists be eliminated,” Igsiz said.

     KURDISH ADMINISTRTION UNDER FIRE 

    Turkey’s Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan also urged Iraqi Kurds to take action against the separatist PKK, whose members sneaking from camps in the mountains of northern Iraq.

     Turkey has long accused the northern Iraqi administration of tolerating the PKK on their territory, where it says the separatists easily obtain weapons and explosives for attacks on Turkish targets across the border.

     The general also accused the northern Iraqi administration of failing to prevent PKK separatists from mixing with the local population, thus making it difficult for the Turkish army to target the PKK members through a series of bombing raids carried out in the region since last October.

     “Members of the organization are based very close to the local population in large parts of northern Iraq and they are exploiting this,” AFP quoted Igsiz as saying. “The northern Iraqi administration makes no effort to prevent this.”

     Igsiz also said that no Turkish ground troops entered Iraq after the attack but Turkish F-16s and artillery units pounded PKK positions just across the border.

     STATIONS TO BE TRANSFERRED

    Igsiz informed that five military stations, including Aktutun the target of Friday’s deadly PKK attack, would be transferred from their current mountainous locations along the border in southeastern Turkey.

     Works had begun last year to move Aktutun outpost to Bercar Tepe, Igsiz said, adding that the outpost would be moved by 2009.

     Friday’s PKK attack was the fifth launched against the Aktutun gendarmerie station, in which a total of 44 soldiers have been killed since 1992.

     MISSING SOLDIERS

    Igsiz said they could not still locate the whereabouts of the two soldiers who went missing after Friday’s attack, adding, “According to our assessment, the two soldiers may be dead.  Searches continue”.

     The terrorist organization was heading towards breaking point and leaned towards sensational actions in an attempt to find a way out, Igsiz added.

     Igsiz said there were no problems in the intelligence sharing mechanism with the United States.

     The latest PKK attack, involving over 300 separatist with heavy weaponry support, had raised questions on the intelligence provided by the United States among Turkish opinion makers. 

     

    HotNewsTurkey  October 05, 2008

  • Turkey to U.S. and Iraq: “Control your borders”

    Turkey to U.S. and Iraq: “Control your borders”

     Following the terrorist attack on a Turkish military outpost, Turkey on Sunday relayed “control you borders” message both to Iraq and the United States, which is leading the coalition forces in this country.

    According to diplomatic sources, Turkey gave a note to Iraq and urged  this country to take all necessary measures to find and punish the perpetrators  and to prevent any similar incidents.

    Sources said the Turkish Embassy in the United States was launching  initiatives with the U.S. officials as this country leads the coalition forces.

    15 Turkish soldiers were killed, 20 others were wounded and two soldiers  went missing, Friday in an assault staged by PKK terrorists from north of Iraq on  Aktütün Gendarmerie Border outpost in Şemdinli town of southeastern province of Hakkari. Turkish soldiers killed 23 terrorists in clashes that erupted.

     

    THE ANATOLIAN NEWS AGENCY  ANKARA

    05 October 2008

    Zaman

  • Conference on Energy Security and Diaspora in the Development of the U.S.-Azerbaijan Strategic Allied Relations ends

    Conference on Energy Security and Diaspora in the Development of the U.S.-Azerbaijan Strategic Allied Relations ends

     

     

    [ 03 Oct 2008 16:52 ]

    Baku-APA. The conference on Energy Security and Diaspora in the Development of the U.S.-Azerbaijan Strategic Allied Relations, which was organized by USAN and State Committee on Works with Azerbaijanis Living Abroad came to an end, Press Service of the State Committee on Works with Azerbaijanis Living Abroad told APA.
    About 300 Diaspora representatives attended the conference at University of George Washington. Former congressmen Greg Laughlin and Robert Livingston, Azerbaijani Ambassador to the US Yashar Aliyev, Elshad Nasirov, Vice President of SOCAR, Adil Bagirov, USAN Executive Director, Professor Tadeusz Swietochowski, Scientist on Azerbaijani Studies addressed the event.
    Ariel Cohen, Senior Research Fellow of Heritage Foundation on former Soviet countries stated that irrespective of victory of any political parties in upcoming presidential elections in the US, White House would continue relations with Azerbaijan on strategic cooperation for the purpose of protection of regional interests.
    On the second day of the conference, Valeh Hajiyev, First Deputy Chairman of State Committee on Works with Azerbaijanis Living Abroad, MP Asim Mollazadeh, Agshin Mehdiyev, Head of Azerbaijan’s Mission to UN, Elin Suleymanov, Azerbaijani Consul General to Los-Angeles spoke about the importance of close relations of Azerbaijani community with our country. Members of Network decided to strengthen relations with the Congress to gain broad support of the US on solution to Nagorno Karabakh conflict, as well as current priorities of Azerbaijani and Turkish Diasporas, Waiver of Section 907 of the Freedom Support Act .
    Appeals on our compatriots living in the US, American public communities, state bodies, presidential candidates and congressmen has been approved at the end of the conference. The appeals cover Azerbaijani realities, solution to Nagorno Karabakh conflict within the framework of Azerbaijan’s territorial integrity and the role of the US in this issue.

  • Karabakh Liberation Organization issues statement condemning “Caucasian festival” to take place in Kars

    Karabakh Liberation Organization issues statement condemning “Caucasian festival” to take place in Kars

     

     

    [ 03 Oct 2008 16:52 ]

    Baku. Ramil Mammadli–APA. Karabakh Liberation Organization (KLO) addressed the Anatolian Turks about the “Caucasian festival” in Kars and Armenian president Serzh Sargsyan’s upcoming visit to Turkey. KLO Press Service told APA the organization accused the Turkey’s current authority in establishing cooperation with Armenia and demanded Turkish people to interfere in this issue. “We hope that you will not allow this treacherous course to keep on. We remind you about the latest events and call on you to prevent “friendly” policy toward Armenians. We believe that you will not allow to the terrorist and bloodsucker president of Armenia Serzh Sargsyan to visit Turkey. There are reports about the Kars municipality’s intentions to hold “Caucasian”, rather “Armenian festival”. This person, who wants to serve Armenians, has not to forget about the barbarism of Armenians in Kars and mass graves there. Kars is a joint historical place for Azerbaijanis and Turks. Those, who want to make Kars “Armenian place”, should be damned”.

  • IRAN TO SUPPLY ARMENIA WITH GAS AND ARMENIA TO EXPORT ELECTRICITY TO IRAN

    IRAN TO SUPPLY ARMENIA WITH GAS AND ARMENIA TO EXPORT ELECTRICITY TO IRAN

    By Emil Danielyan

    Tuesday, September 30, 2008

     

    Armenia appears to have completed construction of a pipeline from neighboring Iran that will supply it with natural gas and significantly ease its heavy dependence on Russia for energy resources. The development will also allow the small landlocked country to avoid disastrous consequences if Moscow decides to cut off gas deliveries to Georgia, a possibility that has become real since the outbreak of the Russian-Georgian war.

    The first, 24.6 mile (41-kilometer) Armenian section of the pipeline was inaugurated by the presidents of Armenia and Iran in March 2007, more than a decade after the two governments agreed to launch the multimillion-dollar project. The national gas distribution company ARG has since been busy building its second and final section. Armenian President Serzh Sarkisian announced on September 3 that work on the almost 120-mile (200-kilometer) stretch, passing through the country’s most mountainous region, was essentially complete; and that the pipeline would go on stream “in late October or early November” (Armenian Public Television, September 3).

    Armenian Energy Minister Armen Movsisian confirmed this later in September, saying that ARG specialists only needed to conduct testing and other technical operations on the facility within the next few weeks. “Iran will pump three million cubic meters of gas [a day] to Armenia during this winter,” the head of the Iranian Gas Export Company, Reza Kasaei-Zadeh, was reported to have announced last week (www.panarmenian.net, September 23).

    The pipeline project has given a massive boost to the close political and economic relations that the Islamic Republic has maintained with its sole Christian neighbor since the break-up of the Soviet Union. Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad reaffirmed Tehran’s intention to deepen those ties when he received Armenian Foreign Minister Eduard Nalbandian in mid-September. “There is no limit to the expansion of relations with Armenia,” the Iranian media quoted him as saying. Armenian-Iranian cooperation, said Ahmadinejad, should serve as a model for the rest of the world (IRNA news agency, September 16).

    Successive Armenian governments have keenly sought this cooperation in order to mitigate the effects of the economic blockades that its two other neighbors, Turkey and Azerbaijan, have imposed on it because of the unresolved conflict over Karabakh. The war in Georgia, which temporarily disrupted the vital transit of Armenian cargo through Georgian territory, has only enhanced Iran’s geopolitical significance for Armenia in the eyes of local policy-makers and the public in general. As Movsisian put it, the Iran-Armenia pipeline will “guarantee” his country’s energy security in “cases of crisis” in the region. It was an obvious reference to the continuing Russian-Georgian conflict and its possible consequences for Armenia.

    The most severe of those consequences would be a Russian decision to end gas supplies to Georgia through a pipeline that also feeds Armenia. With Georgia still heavily reliant on Russian gas, such a move is arguably the most powerful weapon in Moscow’s arsenal of sanctions against Tbilisi. Should the Russians decide to use it, they will almost certainly be unable to pump gas to Armenia through Georgian territory. Both South Caucasus countries use Russian gas for winter heating and for generating a large part of their electricity.

    The launch of the pipeline from Iran could thus hardly come at a better time for Armenia. Access to Iranian gas will not only give Yerevan a viable alternative to Russian deliveries but could strengthen its bargaining position in difficult tariff negotiations with Gazprom. The Russian monopoly plans gradually to raise its gas price for Armenia, which is currently set at $110 per thousand cubic meters, to international levels. Under an agreement signed by Gazprom and ARG executives in Moscow on September 17 and disclosed by the Armenian government a week later, the price will rise to $154 per thousand cubic meters in April 2009 and on to $200 in April 2010. Yerevan’s bargaining position will be limited, however, by the fact that Gazprom has a controlling share in ARG. Whether the Armenian gas company will be ready to cut back on supplies from its parent company if the Iranians offer it a better deal remains to be seen.

    According to energy officials in Yerevan, the new pipeline will have the capacity to pump at least 2.3 billion cubic meters of Iranian gas per annum. That is slightly more than the 2007 volume of Armenia’s gas imports from Russia, which was enough for meeting its energy needs. Officials say that Iranian gas will therefore be mainly converted into electricity at Armenian thermal power plants which will then be exported to Iran. In preparation for a surge in Armenian electricity exports, the two countries are currently building a third high-voltage transmission line linking their power grids.

    Armenia might also need extra gas if it starts selling electricity to Turkey, with which it has no diplomatic relations or open border. According to Movsisian, a relevant agreement was reached during Turkish President Abdullah Gul’s historic September 6 visit to Yerevan that marked an unprecedented rapprochement between the two historical foes. “The Turkish side has asked for four months to complete their part of the [preparatory] work, after which we will start electricity supplies experimentally for a few days and then on a regular basis,” he said (RFE/RL Armenia Report, September 11). Armenia’s state-run power transmission company said that it would deliver 1.5 billion kilowatt/hours of power to a Belgian utility firm in Turkey in the next two years with the option of more than doubling the supply in 2011 (Arminfo news agency, September 16). The Turkish government has yet to confirm the agreement.

  • RUSSIAN-AZERBAIJAN RELATIONS: TIME FOR A GRAND BARGAIN?

    RUSSIAN-AZERBAIJAN RELATIONS: TIME FOR A GRAND BARGAIN?

    By Alman Mir – Ismail

    Thursday, October 2, 2008

     

    The Georgian-Russian conflict in early August brought negative economic and humanitarian consequences for the South Caucasus. Carefully built East-West transport and energy corridors have come under question. Recognition of Abkhazia and South Ossetia by Russia presents another diplomatic difficulty for the countries of the region.

    Yet, in the aftermath of the conflict, Azerbaijan, Georgia’s neighbor and closest ally, finds itself in a unique position for an opportunity to advance relations with Russia. The ultimate prize would be the Kremlin’s support in the Karabakh conflict. There is no doubt in Baku, among both the public and politicians, that the key to the resolution of the Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict lies in Moscow, as Russia was and remains Armenia’s closest military, political, and economic ally. Despite Azerbaijan’s persistent efforts to please Moscow and secure the return of the occupied territories, no success has been achieved yet.

    The current situation, however, presents a rare moment of opportunity for Baku to make Russia an offer it cannot refuse. The ingredients for the grand bargain have been piling up steadily over the past year. Early in the summer, Russian President Medvedev, during a trip to Baku, offered to buy all of Azerbaijan’s gas at the world market price. The Kremlin is obviously not interested in having an alternative gas exporter in its borders. The purchase of Azerbaijani gas would not only enable Moscow to remain the main energy provider to EU but would also help Gazprom fulfill its contractual obligations.

    On the other hand, the negative image that Russia created during the Georgian war is prompting Kremlin strategists to seek more cordial and friendly relations with another South Caucasus country, Azerbaijan, in order to demonstrate to the rest of the world that Russia is not a threat and aggressor to the former Soviet republics and does not intend to restore the Soviet Empire. Thus, Azerbaijan, with its pro-Western integration plans, presents the only chance for Russia to do this. Armenia is already heavily dependant on Russia, and Moscow does not consider it necessary to “win over” Yerevan.

    Gentler and more pragmatic relations with Azerbaijan would not only help Russia repair its image abroad but would also derail Azerbaijan’s pro-NATO and pro-EU course. It is no coincidence that President Medvedev called his Azerbaijani counterpart Ilham Aliyev a few weeks ago to discuss bilateral relations. The latter also traveled to Moscow to meet both Medvedev and Prime Minister Putin to advance the interests of both countries in the region.

    Finally, speculation has arisen in Baku that Moscow is pushing Azerbaijan’s political leadership to open a transit corridor through its territory to Armenia. The Kremlin’s sole remaining partner in the South Caucasus is significantly suffering from the war in Georgia, as transport from Russia to Armenia remains clogged in the closed borders. Armenia also has closed borders with Azerbaijan and Turkey, thus putting its economy under a real threat. Under the grand bargain, Azerbaijan could play a transit role, allowing Russia to ship cargo through its territory to Armenia.

    It seems that not only Russia understands the increased value of Azerbaijan. Geopolitical rivalry over this country has heated up in recent weeks, with U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney visiting Baku and making statements about the United States’ intention to remain an active player in the region. A look at the map of the South Caucasus shows that with Georgia falling out of the Russian orbit, Azerbaijan remains the last battlefield between the West and Russia.

    The situation for the grand bargain seems ripe, especially considering the new dialogue between Turkey and Armenia and the general willingness among Armenian leaders to normalize relations with its neighbors. The traditional belief that Russia should do its best to preserve the conflict between Azerbaijan and Armenia in order to keep its influence over them is not working any more. Russia will always be able to exert pressure and influence over these countries, long after the conflict is resolved. The resolution of the conflict, however, will bring a number of dividends to Russia, including a safer periphery and effective prevention of Radical Islam emerging in the region.

    Compromises on the issue of Karabakh and the restoration of the territorial integrity of Azerbaijan would pave the way for a much firmer and more solid partnership between Moscow and Baku. Moscow can and should push Armenia for more compromises on this issue in order to achieve a long-lasting peace. Otherwise, Azerbaijan, losing its hope to gain support from Kremlin, will continue to drift away toward the West.