Category: USA

Turkey could be America’s most important regional ally, above Iraq, even above Israel, if both sides manage the relationship correctly.

  • ANCA: No Free U.S. Frigates for Turkey

    ANCA: No Free U.S. Frigates for Turkey

    ANCA Joins Greek-Americans in Welcoming Senate Failure to Approve U.S. Taxpayer Give-away to Ankara

    WASHINGTON—Despite the best efforts of Ankara’s allies in Washington, D.C. during the final hours of the Congressional session, the U.S. Senate refused to act Jan. 2 on a free give-away of advanced American naval vessels to Turkey. Earlier this week, the House had approved the controversial measure following a contentious debate, reported the Armenian National Committee of America (ANCA).

    “We join with our Greek-American friends in thanking Congressmen Engel, Sherman, Bilirakis, and Sarbanes for opposing this controversial measure giving away two guided missile frigates to an increasingly arrogant and antagonistic Turkey, and welcome the Senate’s decision to block efforts to ‘fast-track’ passage of this controversial measure in the final hours of the 112th Congress,” said Aram Hamparian, the executive director of the ANCA. “This most recent setback for Turkey reflects the growing bipartisan understanding on both sides of Capitol Hill about the real price America is paying for Turkey’s growing hostility to U.S. interests and allies. Ankara’s failure is yet another signal that the era of Turkey’s having a blank-check in Washington is over.”

    In a letter circulated earlier this week on Capitol Hill, the ANCA stressed that “such a transfer would materially strengthen Ankara’s naval capabilities at a time when it is using its maritime fleet to aggressively challenge the right of Cyprus to explore its off-shore energy resources, and is seeking to obstruct the ability of Greece to protect its territorial waters.” The ANCA also emphasized that “transferring these vessels would also send a dangerous signal to Turkey’s leaders that our government endorses its military occupation of Cyprus, its increasingly belligerent stance toward Israel, its blockade of Armenia, its meddling in the Nagorno-Karabagh conflict resolution process, or, for that matter, its violations against the rights of Christians, Kurds, and other minorities.” The letter closed by noting, “Such material rewards and moral endorsements are neither warranted, nor constructive. In fact, they will work against our nation’s regional security interests.” The American Hellenic Institute, Hellenic American Leadership Council, and other Greek-American groups also weighed in against the transfer. Read the American Hellenic Institute letter to outgoing House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairwoman Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-FL) by visiting .

    The U.S. House, on Dec. 31, considered this transfer as part of H.R.6649, a measure added to the “Suspension Calendar” under expedited procedures requiring a two-thirds vote. The House adopted H.R.6649 after considerable debate, including a defense of the legislation by Rep. Ros-Lehtinen and statements in opposition from Representatives Eliot Engel (D-N.Y.), the incoming Ranking Democrat on the Foreign Affairs Committee, and Brad Sherman (D-Calif.), Gus Bilirakis (R-Fla.), and John Sarbanes (D-Md.). The absence of Senate action at the end of the 112th Congress will mean that any legislation authorizing such a transfer will need to be re-introduced for consideration by the 113th Congress.

    Congressman Brad Sherman, a senior member of the Foreign Affairs Committee, opposed H.R.6649 both on its merits and on the process being used to secure its consideration in the final hours of the Congressional session. “Woodrow Wilson noted that Congress in committee is Congress at work,” he said. “Congress ignoring the committee process is a Congress that doesn’t work. This bill has not been the subject of hearing and, more importantly, a markup in the Foreign Affairs Committee. And in the dead of night, provisions to transfer two frigates to Turkey, a controversial provision, was added to this otherwise innocuous bill… Send this bill back to committee. Let us have a real discussion. Let us follow the rules, not suspend the rules, when we’re dealing with a matter of this importance to our foreign policy in the eastern Mediterranean.”

    Congressman Engel, in his remarks, stressed, ” Some people say this should continue because, after all, Turkey is an ally and we need to help them. Well, I look at it the other way: They’re a NATO ally, so they have responsibility. And the way they’re acting has been anything but responsible. This is not an inconsequential or trivial matter.”

    Representative Sarbanes, in his comments, remarked, “This is not a non-controversial bill. I know it’s being brought here on suspension as though it is, and I’m sure in the past when we’ve had these transfers of vessels, excess defense materials and so forth, often that is a non-controversial action to take. In this case, it’s anything but non-controversial, and I’m surprised, frankly, that the majority would bring the bill to the floor in this form.”

    In his remarks, Rep. Bilirakis explained his opposition to H.R.6649, noting that “the Turkish Navy, as recently as last year, held naval live-fire exercises in the eastern Mediterranean. These provocative exercises took place near the natural gas fields of Israel and the Republic of Cyprus and threatened to disrupt peaceful and productive economic activity. Instead, Mr. Speaker, it is my hope that, in the eastern Mediterranean, Congress will continue to work to foster the relationships between the United States, Greece, Israel, and Cyprus in order to promote and foster issues of mutual, economic, and diplomatic importance.”

    Congressional scrutiny of the proposed transfer of advanced naval vessels, which are described by the U.S. Navy as having been designed, among other missions, to support and protect amphibious landing forces, was heightened by Turkey’s record of aggression in neighboring littoral areas, most notably its 1974 invasion and ongoing military occupation of Cyprus, as well as its false claims to sovereign Greek islands in the Aegean Sea, and its regular incursions into both Greek and Cypriot territorial waters.

  • Mohsen Pakayeen: “Neither Iranian, nor Azerbaijani people have separatist thoughts”

    Mohsen Pakayeen: “Neither Iranian, nor Azerbaijani people have separatist thoughts”

    Mohsen-Pak-Aein-the-ambassador-of-Islamic-Republic-of-Iran-to-Azerbaijan

     

     

     

     

    Gulnara Inandzh,

    Head of Representative Office of Lev Gumilev Center of Russia in Azerbaijan,  

    Director of Information and Analytical Center Etnoglobus (ethnoglobus.az), editor of Russian section of Turkishnews American-Turkish Resource website www.turkishnews.com

     

     

    Exclusive interview of Iran’s ambassador to Azerbaijan Mohsen Pakayeen to www.islamınsesi.az portal.

     

    – What is the reason of tension between Azerbaijan and Iran although it has decreased somehow?

     

    – I don’t think that there is any crisis between Iran-Azerbaijan. There may be misunderstanding in the family that we can not call it crisis.  Besides, it is also possible that there are misunderstandings with regard to visa issues between these neighboring countries, but they are being settled through diplomatic ways.

     

    It should be considered that we have more in common than misunderstandings. I should restate that we have much in common which is reflected in cultural, historical, religious and ethnic factor. Most of the population both in Azerbaijan and Iran speak the same language. There is no another two countries being so close.

     

    Thanks to the will of the politicians and leaders of two countries these relations develop day by day.  The second and third elements and scientists try to exaggerate some issues, but these are not main problem for us.

    It is necessary that the leaders of our countries should come to agreement in these issues. From this point of view I think that we will have good relations in the future.

     

    The meetings of countries’ officials last year in Iran and Azerbaijan show the progress of bilateral relations in the positive direction.

     

    -National Assembly (Milli Mejlis) cancelled the agreement on use of non-visa regime being applied for the citizens located in the 40 km of frontier areas between Iran-Azerbaijan.  How do you think, will this decision cause new tensions?   

     

    – Parliamentary deputies are the representative of people. The make decisions via discussions. We respect their decisions. We think that it is reasonable to eliminate the limitation with regard to movement of not only our citizens but also Azerbaijani citizens in the neighbor country.  Easing of visa regime may lead to the development of trade and warming and expansion of relations between peoples. Besides we have to consider that there are family and friendship relations between Iran and Azerbaijan.

    Besides, non-visa regime will lead to the development of tourism and both the nation. That is the reason why Iran has unilaterally cancelled the visa regime for Azerbaijani citizens. We do hope that one day Azerbaijan will also cancel visa regime for Iranian citizens.

     

    – Official Baku says it aims at eliminating access of enemies to Azerbaijan from Iran…

     

    – 5 thousands of Iranians travels to Azerbaijan. We have not seen any Iranians intending to interfere in internal issues of Azerbaijan.  They got acquainted with Azerbaijan, establish contacts with the people, trade and return.

     

    Of course, struggling against smugglers and ensuring safety requires specific principles. If we prevent the people from traveling to some country due to safety issues, then the Ministry of Tourism should not operate. We have to avoid negative view towards our relations.

     

    It is interesting, no one in Azerbaijan violates the law? But, we can not refer it to all Azerbaijanis. There are special bodies engaged in issues with law violators. Criminals don’t need a visa and he or she can manage to pass the border.

     

    -In the end of last year discussions began with regard to establishment of Free Trade Zone (FTZ) in the borderline areas. What are the perspectives of FTZ?

     

    -Establishment of FTZ will serve to develop relations between two countries. Such zones are free of taxes which lead to decrease of prices and consequently increase purchasing power of the population.   Ostans of Eastern Azerbaijan provinces and Azerbaijani envoy to Iran have started talks on these issues. Iran has 15 neighbors. We have established FTZ with our neighbors and see its positive results.

     

    Application of visa regime in Azerbaijan will not prevent FTZ’s activity. Azerbaijani citizens can travel to Iran and trade here. Application of non-visa regime for Iranian citizens in Azerbaijan would make the processes more active and give grounds for generation of mutual confidence.

     

     

    – I think that real reason of mutual distress is ethnic issues. Turkish speaking Azerbaijanis live in Iran, while Persian speaking Talishs live Azerbaijan. How do these issues affect the relations?

     

    -I think neither Iranian nor Azerbaijani people have separatist thoughts. This is much far from our people. In Azerbaijan national consciousnes of Azerbaijanism and in Iran Iranism have been formed. It is not important that national minority is paid much attention in our countries. I don’t believe that it will affect the relations between our countries.

     

    Processes around Iran, Syrian conflict, placement of “Patriot” missiles in Turkey increase the tension in the region …

     

    – Syrian conflict has nothing to do with “Arab spring”.  Changes happening in Arab world, especially in the Northern Africa are called as Islamic awakening. People were against the power in these countries electing their new government.

     

    Uprising in Syria began as a result of intervention of foreign countries. Western countries provided the Al-Qaida sending to act against Bashar al-Assad. Al-Qaida militants carry out terror acts killing their compatriots. We have not seen such cases in Tunis, Egypt or in Yemen.

     

    These people were against intervention of Western countries and Israel in their internal issues. US have officially announced its support to Syrian opposition. US Congress has made a decision on arming Syrian opposition.

     

    Unfortunately, Syrian neighbors, including Arabic countries were deceived, but it is too late to go back. They thought they were following reforms, however consequently they supported terrorism. Reform cannot be brought from abroad.

     

    They may kill the people, even overthrow Bashar al-Assad, but the fact is that they will not bring reform to Syria.  We cannot call Syrian uprising as Islamic awakening or “Arab Spring”.

     

    Syria is in frontline in struggle against Israel. They think they have to overthrow Syrian government for it.

     

    – But the processes that we call as «Islamic awakening» opened the door for salafism to the region …

     

    -We know Syrian opposition very well. Majority of them support reform and some terror. Reform supporters want to achieve reform and prefer doing it through elections, not with weapon.

    Everybody knows salafis. They are Al-Qaida militants. US have officially declared that it has created both Taliban and Al-Qaida and that these militant networks carry out Washington’s interests. Why should we close our eyes to it?.

     

    We cannot call terrorists elements as Islamic awakening. Islam is against of killing thousands of innocent people and destroying mosques. We cannot justify the crimes committed under the pretext of Islam.

     

    – Everyone has its own justice. Iran has also confirmed its support to Syrian government …

     

    – Iran believes that changes should be achieved through the people.
    If it becomes habit that governments are overthrown under the management of foreign powers, no president can consider himself/herself safe.

    We support the powers fighting against the foreign intervention in Syria. We don’t want government to be changed under the pretext of reform.

     

     

     

  • U.S. troops arrive in Turkey; rebels battle for airport in Syria – CNN.com

    U.S. troops arrive in Turkey; rebels battle for airport in Syria – CNN.com

    (CNN) — U.S. troops arrived in Turkey on Friday to man Patriot missile defense batteries near the Syrian border, Turkish state media said.

    121220114512-02-syria-1220-horizontal-gallery

    The move was made after Syria launched Scud missiles at cities near the Turkish border. In response, the U.S., Germany and the Netherlands have deployed Patriot air defense missiles to the border region to intercept any Syrian ballistic missiles.

    U.S. officials: Syria using more accurate, Iranian-made missiles

    The missiles and troops are under the control of NATO, but the missiles are to be operated by U.S. forces.

    U.S. troops arrive in Turkey

    A group of 27 U.S. troops landed in Gaziantep, Turkey, where they will survey the Patriot deployment, Turkish state news agency Anadolu said.

    U.S. officials did not release any information about the troops’ arrival, but had said last month that forces would be deployed to Turkey.

    “We’ve made very clear to them that we’re going to protect countries in this region,” Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said last month. “We have to act to do what we have to do to make sure that we defend ourselves and make sure that Turkey can defend itself.”

    The fight for a helicopter airport

    Meanwhile, Free Syrian Army fighters tried Friday for the third consecutive day to wrest control of a helicopter base from government forces.

    If successful, the assault on Taftanaz Air Base in northern Syria would shut President Bashar al-Assad’s military helicopter pads and diminish his ability to launch airstrikes in the region.

    Opposition and government sources reported that the extremist Nusra Front, which the United States has designated as a terrorist group, was taking part in the assault on the airport.

    Al-Assad has exacted retribution on the nearby city of Binnish, where amateur video posted on the Internet shows dozens of smoke plumes marking where ordnance has struck.

    Read more: Getting to know Syria’s first family

    On Thursday, rebels posted videos of themselves firing on the air base with truck-mounted machine guns and a captured tank, destroying one government tank and appearing to shoot down a helicopter.

    CNN cannot confirm the authenticity of videos from the Syrian conflict posted online.

    Read more: Patriot missiles a warning to Syria’s al-Assad

    Gas station attack in Damascus

    In Damascus, an explosion at a gas station near a hospital killed 10 people Friday, Syrian TV reported.

    An opposition organization expected the toll to rise as many of the wounded were in critical condition after fire spread to nearby cars and buildings.

    The explosion came from a car bomb, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said on its Facebook page.

    Read more: What’s next for Syria

    Appeal for missing U.S. journalist

    A picture taken on November 5 in Aleppo shows U.S. freelance reporter James Foley,

    A picture taken on November 5 in Aleppo shows U.S. freelance reporter James Foley,

    In New Hampshire, the parents of American journalist James Foley appealed Thursday to his kidnappers to release him and inform them of his whereabouts and condition of his health.

    Read more: American journalist abducted in Syria

    Foley’s father choked up while reading a statement directed at the abductors. “We’d like them to contact us,” he said. “I ask the captors for their compassion and James’ quick release.”

    Foley was abducted in November in Syria, where he has worked for a year. He had been detained before while working in Libya but was released by the government.

    Read more: Missing American journalist’s parents: Send our son home

    The rapidly mounting death toll

    At least 129 people were killed across Syria on Friday, according to the Local Coordination Committees, an opposition activist network. CNN cannot independently confirm those numbers.

    The overall death toll in Syria has surpassed 60,000 people, the United Nations said Wednesday.

    That’s roughly the population of Terre Haute, Indiana; or Cheyenne, Wyoming. It’s how many people would fit in Dodger Stadium, and it’s more than the 50,000-plus U.S. combat deaths in Vietnam.

    Read more: U.N.’s Syria death toll jumps to 60,000-plus

    On Thursday, al-Assad’s forces bombed the Damascus suburb of Douma with airstrikes. In videos posted on the Internet, residents could be seen combing through rubble and pulling out bodies.

    CNN’s Amir Ahmed and Joe Sterling contributed to this report.

    via U.S. troops arrive in Turkey; rebels battle for airport in Syria – CNN.com.

  • Washington’s misplaced support for Turkey’s Erdogan

    Washington’s misplaced support for Turkey’s Erdogan

    December 26, 2012 by Ataturk Society UK

    Washington’s misplaced support for Turkey’s Erdogan

    TAOS, New Mexico, December 23, 2012 – For over a decade now, US administrations have hailed Turkey’s Islamist AKP government led by Prime Minister Erdogan as a model of democracy and “moderate” Islam. In the wake of the Arab Spring, Prime Minister Erdogan traveled to Libya, Egypt and Tunisia as an extension of American “soft power” to encourage fledgling governments to adopt the Turkish version of Islamic democracy.

    The problem here is that Washington is again allowing pragmatism to trump principle. The US is apparently so eager to find alternative vehicles of political expression to combat radical Islam in the Middle East that it is willing to gloss over the gross violations of basic human rights being perpetrated in its chosen “model” for the world of Islam.

    Return of the Ottomans?

    It is no secret that Erdogan and his chief advisors are ardent admirers of the Ottoman state, the vast empire ruled by the Turks for 600 years. This open admiration coupled with the government’s foreign policy strategies indicate that Erdogan’s government is seeking to regain a similar type of influence in the region. The question is which Ottoman Sultan Erdogan is trying to emulate.

    Sultan Beyazid mi?

    In 1485 Sultan Beyazid II issued a decree banning the printing press in the Ottoman Empire. It would be two and half centuries (1727) before printing of Arabic letters would be permitted.

    In its 2012 report, the watchdog group Reporters Without Borders, which is based in France, confirms what press freedom activists and international observers have been shouting from the rooftops for years now. The secular, constitutional, democratic, Republic of Turkey, a candidate for EU membership and the only Muslim member of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) has been waging a campaign of terror against freedom of the press, jailing more journalists for their professional activities than any other country in the world.

    With 72 journalists currently in prison pending trial, at least 46 of which RSF has determined are being incarcerated for their journalistic work, Turkey has more than twice as many reporters in prison as China (30), followed by Eritrea (28), Iran (26) and Syria (21).

    RSF called Turkey, “…the world’s biggest prison for journalists, a sad paradox for a country that portrays itself as a regional democratic model.”

    Although their tally differs slightly, The Committee to Protect Journalists, based in New York, also puts Turkey at the top of its list of offenders. Turkish journalist Mehmet Ali Birand is quoted as saying that the Turkish government “does not differentiate between these two major things: freedom of expression and terrorism.”

    Erdogan’s government claims that these journalists are being held for serious crimes, namely membership in armed terrorist organizations and that their detentions have nothing to do with journalism. But, the facts tell a different story. The AKP may not have banned the press, but it has ruthlessly suppressed dissent and intimidated its political opponents, especially those voicing their opinions in the public arena by sending them to prison and leaving them there to rot.

    Sultan Abdülhamid mi?

    In 1880, Sultan Abdülhamid responded positively to attempts by Sheikh Ubeydullah to win some degree of autonomy for the Kurds under Turkish protection. It looked like the Turks and Kurds might have found a federal solution, but it was short-lived and Kurdish aspirations were dashed when the Ottomans reasserted supreme control.

    This is not unlike to Erdogan’s much touted Kurdish Initiative, which was supposed to bury the hatchet between the two peoples. When the Kurds did not respond to Turkish magnanimity as he had hoped, he followed in the footsteps of Sultan Abdülhamid wearing boots of iron.

    The European Association of Lawyers for Democracy and World Human Rights (ELDH) reports that around 8,000 politicians, trade-unionists, journalists, artists, students, human rights activists and their lawyers have been the victims of mass arrests in Turkey since 2009. Many of these arrests have been part of the Turkish government’s operation against the KCK (Union of Communities in Kurdistan) under the Anti-Terrorism Law of 1991.

    Those arrested include Mr. Ragip Zarakolu, a publisher nominated for the Nobel Prize by members of the Swedish Parliament and a founding member of the Turkish Human Rights Association (IHD); Prof. Büsra Ersanlı, a constitutional law expert, and Ayşe Berktay, a respected translator, researcher and global peace and justice activist, who was one of the main organizers of the World Tribunal on Iraq in Istanbul in 2005. A total of 205 individuals have been indicted in the case and the next hearing is scheduled for February 4, 2013.

    Thirty-six Turkish and Kurdish lawyers were arrested in raids conducted across the country in November 2011. IHD Vice President Muharrem Erbey is still in prison awaiting trial and was not even released to receive the Ludovic-Trarieux Prize from the German Minister of Justice in November 2012.

    In questioning by parliament, Turkish Minister of Justice Sadullah Ergin admitted that 2,146 people are currently on trial in the KCK operation, of which 992 are in prison and 274 are elected representatives. This is just one example of the “mass trials” being conducted in Turkey, trials that often take years and during which even nonviolent individuals who do not pose a flight risk are held without bail.

    The European Commission’s 2011 Progress Reports states: “Frequent use of arrests instead of judicial supervision, limited access to files, failure to give detailed grounds for detention decisions and revisions of such decisions highlight the need to bring the Turkish criminal justice system into line with international standards and to amend the anti-terror legislation.” The ELDH report notes that since the founding of the European Court of Human Rights, the majority of violation judgments have been handed down against Turkey, even more than those against Russia.

    Sultan Mahmud mu?

    For centuries the Janissaries, the elite troops of the Ottoman Empire, were the terror of Europe and the spearhead of Ottoman military expansion into southern Europe. They may have been an asset on the battlefield, but they were always a thorn in the Sultan’s side at home. The Janissaries were often the de facto rulers of the Empire. When their demands were not met, they rioted. Their power was so great that they had the heads of unpopular viziers handed to them on a platter. In 1826, Mahmud II solved this problem once and for all by turning artillery on the Janissary barracks and slaughtering the entire lot.

    The “mass trial” technique used against political opponents was also employed against the military starting in 2008. In the Balyoz (Sledgehammer) and Ergenkon cases, hundreds of high-ranking officers and generals from the Turkish Armed Forces (TAF) are accused of plotting to overthrow Erdogan’s government. As a result, members of the armed forces opposed to the Islamist AKP have been liquidated, much like the Janissaries.

    Convictions were handed down in the Sledgehammer case earlier this year even though it has been convincingly demonstrated that some of the digital “evidence” in the alleged coup plot was fabricated. The Ergenkon trial is ongoing. But last year the four most senior military officers resigned in protest of the continuing detention of 250 officers.

    The need for reform in the military has been obvious for a long time. It viewed itself as the guardian of the secular regime in Turkey and wielded an inordinate amount of power over the country, power that the EU and proponents of democracy claimed was antithetical to the rule of law and government of, by and for the people. The army was a source of ultra-nationalism and displayed fascist tendencies. It often opposed the opening of the country to foreign involvement and investment, but it was committed to the secular principles of Atatürk, and supporters have long insisted that without it Turkey would be another Islamic state under sharia law.

    It is in this context that the military trials must be viewed. Many Turks would expect the military to have drawn up contingency plans for dealing with any attempt by a religiously motivated political party to impose sharia law and overthrow the constitutional order. This is not “coup planning.”

    Unfortunately for the military, Erdogan’s friends in the West apparently agree with Erdogan’s decision to deal with the military. So Erdogan is following in the footsteps of Mahmud II with this one-and-done approach to eliminating the problematic military establishment. The problem is that these mass trials have clearly violated principles of due process and certainly convicted innocent men. Necessary collateral damage? Maybe. As the Turkish proverb says, ‘Green wood burns too when lit alongside the dry.’

    Sultan Selim mi?

    Selim III was a very reform-minded ruler who was well-educated and loved literature and calligraphy. He was said to be a brilliant musician and was a patron of the fine arts. His ascendancy to the throne was an occasion of great joy, for the people had hoped that he would restore their former superiority.

    Erdogan too has initiated a number of important reforms. His administration has, at least in word, recognized the rights of minorities more than any government since the Republic was founded. The political stability helped foster a period of incredible economic growth. He has pushed for democracy in the Middle East and championed Turkey’s membership in the EU. He also launched the Alliance of Civilizations with Spanish Prime Minister Zapatero. The window dressing is impressive.

    Selim III did not have an auspicious end. His efforts to reform the military eventually backfired and he abdicated only to be assassinated two months later. The blatant disregard for human rights may prove to be Erdogan’s undoing as well.

    Last week Prime Minister Erdogan went to Middle East Technical University to celebrate the launch of a satellite. The university has a reputation for opposing right-wing Islamic governments. Erdogan must have felt threatened as his visit was accompanied by 2,500 police, 20 armored vehicles and 105 protective vehicles. There were clashes between students and police. News of the event quickly spread around the world via social media, using the slogan, “Let the Sultan issue his decrees, the country belongs to us.”

    Western kowtowing

    For decades now, many international and European organizations have condemned Turkey’s human rights record, but neither Washington nor Belgium nor the UN has ever recommended sanctions. It is time for change.

    Support for the oppressive policies of governments Washington views as a “strategic partner” comes straight out of Washington’s playbook of failure. Remember US support for Saddam Hussein in the proxy war to counter the expansion of Iranian power and how necessary it was to support the dictator? Iraq failed while Iran’s mullahs remain in power. Recall the billions of dollars in foreign aid, including weapons, for Mubarak’s Egypt in the hopes that he could contain radical Islam. The oppressive policies of Mubarak’s authoritarian government only encouraged the “martyr” sentiment and today the Muslim Brotherhood ratified a constitution based on sharia law.

    It is time for President Barack Obama to call his friend Erdogan and have a frank conversation about what it means to be the leader of a free people under the rule of law. It is time to put principle above pragmatism. The last thing the West needs is a Sultan in Ankara.

     

     

    Luke Montgomery, author of A Deceit To Die For, lived in the Middle East for over a decade. He holds an MA in Linguistics, speaks fluent Turkish and writes on foreign policy, religion and culture. You can follow his work at www.lukemontgomery.net, or find him on Twitter at @LookingFor_Luke and on Facebook.

  • Senate does not approve free frigates for Turkey

    Senate does not approve free frigates for Turkey

    Despite the best efforts of Ankara’s allies in Washington during the final hours of the Congressional session, the U.S. Senate refused to act Wednesday on a free give-away of advanced American naval vessels to Turkey. Earlier this week, the House had approved the controversial measure, following a contentious debate, reported the Armenian National Committee of America.

    “We join with our Greek American friends in thanking Congressmen Engel, Sherman, Bilirakis, and Sarbanes for opposing this controversial measure giving away two guided missile frigates to an increasingly arrogant and antagonistic Turkey, and welcome the Senate’s decision to block efforts to ‘fast-track’ passage of this controversial measure in the final hours of the 112th Congress,” said Aram Hamparian, Executive Director of the ANCA. “This most recent setback for Turkey reflects the growing bipartisan understanding on both sides of Capitol Hill about the real price America is paying for Turkey’s growing hostility to U.S. interests and allies. Ankara’s failure is yet another signal that the era of Turkey’s having a blank-check in Washington is over.”

    In a letter circulated earlier this week on Capitol Hill, the ANCA stressed that: “Such a transfer would materially strengthen Ankara’s naval capabilities at a time when it is using its maritime fleet to aggressively challenge the right of Cyprus to explore its off-shore energy resources, and is seeking to obstruct the ability of Greece to protect its territorial waters.” The ANCA also emphasized that: “Transferring these vessels would also send a dangerous signal to Turkey’s leaders that our government endorses its military occupation of Cyprus, its increasingly belligerent stance toward Israel, its blockade of Armenia, its meddling in the Nagorno Karabakh conflict resolution process, or, for that matter, its violations against the rights of Christians, Kurds, and other minorities.” The letter closed by noting that: “Such material rewards and moral endorsements are neither warranted, nor constructive. In fact, they will work against our nation’s regional security interests.” The American Hellenic Institute, Hellenic American Leadership Council, and other Greek American groups also weighed in against the transfer.

    The U.S. House, on December 31st, considered this transfer as part of H.R.6649, a measure added to the “Suspension Calendar” under expedited procedures requiring a two thirds vote. The House adopted H.R.6649 after considerable debate, including a defense of the legislation by Rep. Ros-Lehtinen and statements in opposition from Representatives Eliot Engel (D-NY), the incoming Ranking Democrat on the Foreign Affairs Committee, and Brad Sherman (D-CA), Gus Bilirakis (R-FL), and John Sarbanes (D-MD). The absence of Senate action at the end of the 112th Congress will mean that any legislation authorizing such a transfer will need to be re-introduced for consideration by the 113th Congress.

    Congressman Brad Sherman, a senior member of the Foreign Affairs Committee, opposed H.R.6649 both on its merits and on the process being used to secure its consideration in the final hours of the Congressional session, noting: “Woodrow Wilson noted that Congress in committee is Congress at work. Congress ignoring the committee process is a Congress that doesn’t work. This bill has not been the subject of hearing and, more importantly, a markup in the Foreign Affairs Committee. And in the dead of night, provisions to transfer two frigates to Turkey, a controversial provision, was added to this otherwise innocuous bill… Send this bill back to committee. Let us have a real discussion. Let us follow the rules, not suspend the rules, when we’re dealing with a matter of this importance to our foreign policy in the eastern Mediterranean.”

    Congressman Engel, in his remarks, stressed: “Some people say this should continue because, after all, Turkey is an ally and we need to help them. Well, I look at it the other way. They’re a NATO ally, so they have responsibility. And the way they’re acting has been anything but responsible. This is not an inconsequential or trivial matter.”

    Representative Sarbanes, in his comments, remarked that: “This is not a non-controversial bill. I know it’s being brought here on suspension as though it is, and I’m sure in the past when we’ve had these transfers of vessels, excess defense materials and so forth, often that is a non-controversial action to take. In this case, it’s anything but non-controversial, and I’m surprised, frankly, that the majority would bring the bill to the floor in this form.”

    In his remarks, Rep. Bilirakis explained his opposition to H.R.6649, noting that: “the Turkish navy, as recently as last year, held naval live-fire exercises in the eastern Mediterranean. These provocative exercises took place near the natural gas fields of Israel and the Republic of Cyprus and threatened to disrupt peaceful and productive economic activity. Instead, Mr. Speaker, it is my hope that, in the eastern Mediterranean, Congress will continue to work to foster the relationships between the United States, Greece, Israel, and Cyprus in order to promote and foster issues of mutual, economic, and diplomatic importance.”

    Congressional scrutiny of the proposed transfer of advanced naval vessels, which are described by the U.S. Navy as having been designed, among other missions, to support and protect amphibious landing forces, was heightened by Turkey’s record of aggression in neighboring littoral areas, most notably its 1974 invasion and ongoing military occupation of Cyprus, as well as its false claims to sovereign Greek islands in the Aegean Sea, and its regular incursions into both Greek and Cypriot territorial waters.

  • US representatives approve granting two missile ships to Turkey

    US representatives approve granting two missile ships to Turkey

    Congress_290908

    US House of Representatives approved a bill that would authorize US President Barack Obama to grant two guided missile frigates to Turkey, Anadolu Agency reported.

    The bill was submitted by Republican member Ileana Ros-Lehtinen and Democratic member Howard Berman, and it was debated at House floor through suspension of rules that by-passed a preliminary debate at the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.

    If the bill also gets the backing of the US Senate, Turkey may receive the USS Halyburton (FFG-40) and the USS Thach (FFG-43) — both capable of firing guided missiles — along with several other countries, including Thailand and Mexico.

    via US representatives approve granting two missile ships to Turkey – Trend.Az.