Category: USA

Turkey could be America’s most important regional ally, above Iraq, even above Israel, if both sides manage the relationship correctly.

  • Caucasus Crisis Leaves Ankara Torn Between US and Russia

    Caucasus Crisis Leaves Ankara Torn Between US and Russia

    The simmering crisis brought about by Russia’s recent incursion into Georgia is putting Turkey on the spot, presenting Ankara with an undesirable choice between backing its traditional western allies and preserving its growing trade relations with Russia.

    “Turkey is torn between the latest developments, not only between Russia and Georgia but mainly between Russia and the United States and NATO as well. Even if we do not go back to the Cold War, at the point that we have arrived to today, Turkey cannot manage this crisis with ’platonic moves,’” said a recent commentary published by the English-language Turkish Daily News.

    During the Cold War, Turkey — a member of NATO and a long-time ally of Washington — found itself on the frontlines of containing the Soviet Union. Even during the Ottoman period, Russia — which invaded Eastern Anatolia at the start of World War I — was viewed as a dangerous regional competitor.

    The Turkish-Russian relationship has changed dramatically in recent years, though. Today, Russia is Turkey’s largest trading partner, with trade between the two countries expected to reach $38 billion this year, up from $27 billion the year before. Russia also supplies close to half of Turkey’s crude oil and 65 percent of its natural gas, used both to heat Turkish hom

    EurasiaNet Eurasia Insight – Turkey: Caucasus Crisis Leaves Ankara Torn Between US and Russia.

  • CONF./CFP- Society for Armenian Studies, UCLA, March 27-28, 2009

    CONF./CFP- Society for Armenian Studies, UCLA, March 27-28, 2009

    Posted by: Hovann Simonian <hovanns@aol.com>

    Call For Papers

    Armenian Studies at a Threshold: Celebrating the 35th Anniversary of
    the Society for Armenian Studies

    An international conference organized by the Society for Armenian
    Studies at the University of California, Los Angeles, March 27-28, 2009
    To mark the 35th anniversary of the Society for Armenian Studies
    (SAS), the executive committee of the Society is organizing a special
    academic conference titled “Armenian Studies at a Threshold:
    Celebrating the 35th Anniversary of the Society for Armenian Studies.”

    This multidisciplinary gathering will give the opportunity to SAS
    members as well as other scholars from around the world to present
    their latest research in the field of Armenian studies, along with
    research from other disciplines in the humanities and social sciences
    in which the case studies are related to themes affecting Armenia or
    Armenians. The organizers hope that this conference will help break
    new ground in Armenian studies in general and in some of its
    sub-disciplines such as history, linguistics, literature, political
    science, anthropology, sociology, economics, musicology, and so on.

    Scholars who wish to present papers at the conference are requested to
    submit a one-page proposal by December 1, 2008. The proposal should
    include the title of the paper, a 300-word abstract, a brief
    biography/institutional affiliation of the author(s), and contact details.

    The committee invites proposals for panels organized around a
    particular theme and for roundtable discussion sessions concentrating
    on problems of theory and methodology in Armenian studies. Panels
    should include three or four papers, and roundtable discussion
    sessions should not exceed six participants. Abstracts of 500 words
    for panels and roundtables should be submitted by December 1.

    All proposals will be peer reviewed by an ad hoc committee of the SAS.
    In case more proposals are received than the conference can
    accommodate, priority will be given to SAS members who have recently
    joined the organization, to young, forthcoming scholars, and to those
    whose papers explore previously uncharted topics and/or breaking new
    theoretical or methodological grounds in the field.

    The deadline for drafts of accepted papers is March 1, 2009. The
    organizers will circulate electronic versions of these drafts to other
    participants before the opening of the conference. The maximum time
    limit for the oral presentations is 20 minutes.

    The Society for Armenian Studies has only limited funds to assist some
    participants with travel and accommodation expenses. Hence, the
    committee urges all presenters to apply for institutional or
    organizational support. Those who have no means to obtain outside
    assistance should submit to the conference organizers a request for
    travel and accommodation assistance along with their proposal.

    Proposals should be submitted by December 1, 2008, to the SAS Secretariat:

    barlowd@csufresno.edu

    Society for Armenian Studies
    Armenian Studies Program
    California State University. Fresno
    5245 N. Backer Avenue, PB 4
    Fresno, California 93740-800

  • Possibilities for improving Azeri-Armenian relations

    Possibilities for improving Azeri-Armenian relations

    By JOHN C.K. DALY

    WASHINGTON, Sept. 11 (UPI) — Last month’s military conflict between Russia and Georgia over South Ossetia has cast a harsh spotlight on Western assumptions about exporting Azeri oil through neighboring Georgia and Turkey.

    While the military confrontation focused Western media attention on tensions between Russia and Georgia, Azerbaijan itself remains gripped by a “frozen conflict” dating back to even before the 1991 collapse of the Soviet Union. Azerbaijan’s clashes with Armenia over the enclaves of Nagorno-Karabakh and Nakhchivan broke out in February 1988; by the time a cease-fire was signed in May 1994 ending active hostilities, thousands had been killed and wounded, while hundreds of thousands of refugees were created on both sides and the Armenian armed forces were left occupying swaths of Azeri territory, including Nagorno-Karabakh and seven neighboring districts. The volatility of the situation was instrumental in the eventual decisions of the Western consortium members to build their proposed export pipeline for Azeri oil through Georgia rather than utilize a shorter route transiting Armenia.

    Now, however, there are some indications that there might yet again be movement toward a resolution of the issue. On Wednesday, after meeting with Turkish President Abdullah Gul, Azeri President Ilham Aliyev expressed hope that the Nagorno-Karabakh issue eventually could be settled. Gul’s comments had a strong economic undertone, as he told reporters, “If we settle this conflict, which I hope we will manage to do, all countries of the region will develop much faster.”

    A resolution of the disputes between Azerbaijan and Armenia could give Western investors yet another export route for Caspian energy, an issue of growing concern among Western investors because of Russia’s increasing assertiveness in the region, combined with the fragility of export routes through Georgia, as demonstrated by the recent conflict. The prize is certainly tempting: The Caspian’s 143,244 square miles and attendant coastline are estimated to contain as much as 250 billion barrels of recoverable oil, boosted by more than 200 billion barrels of potential reserves, quite aside from up to 328 trillion cubic feet of recoverable natural gas. From the outset Washington’s policy has been to construct, if possible, multiple export pipeline routes, bypassing both Russia and charter “axis of evil” member Iran.

    Because of the Nagorno-Karabakh dispute, however, export routes to Armenia were never considered as a viable option in 1994 after then-Azeri President Geidar Aliyev signed the “Contract of the Century” with Western energy concerns to develop Azerbaijan’s Caspian Azeri-Chirag-Guneshli fields. Consequently, the first Western export oil pipeline not under Russian control went westward through Georgia. In 1999 Baku’s export options broadened with the opening of the $600 million, 515 mile, 100,000-barrel-per-day Baku-Supsa pipeline. Azerbaijan was finally able to free itself completely from reliance on Russian export pipelines when, in May 2006, the $3.6 billion, 1,092-mile, million-barrel-per-day Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline opened.

    The Armenians and Azeris sought to influence Washington’s decisions on the region; political agitation by the Armenian-American lobby resulted in the inclusion in 1992 of Section 907 in the U.S. Freedom Support Act, which banned any direct U.S. aid to the Azerbaijani government as punishment for its blockade of Armenia. It was only in January 2002 that President George W. Bush waived the legislation as a reward for Azeri support of the United States following the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

    The Bush administration, in one of its first foreign policy initiatives, attempted to break the diplomatic impasse between the two Caucasian nations. In April 2001, even before the waiver of Section 907, Secretary of State Colin Powell’s first major foreign initiative was to try to resolve the Nagorno-Karabakh dispute during a summit in Key West, Fla., where he met with Azeri President Geidar Aliyev and Armenian President Robert Kocharyan. But the meetings, which were held by the Office for Security and Cooperation in Europe Minsk Group co-chairs France, Russia and United States, proved fruitless.

    There now seems to be a genuine chance for breaking the diplomatic logjam, especially as Turkey and Armenia are slowly edging toward restoring relations, as well, in the wake of last week’s “soccer diplomacy,” which saw Gul fly to Yerevan to attend a Turkish-Armenian football match, where he held talks with Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan.

    Gul is convinced that new opportunities have opened for settling the Nagorno-Karabakh dispute. He pragmatically informed journalists that a resolution of the issue could allow all countries of the region to get involved in major energy transportation projects, noting, “If the mood of cooperation prevails in the region over hostility, it will serve the interests of all countries in the Caucasus.” Ankara is certainly thinking big; Turkish Minister for Energy and Natural Resources Hilmi Guler, currently in Baku to attend a conference on “oil and gas potential in Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan” organized in Azerbaijan, held out optimism that one of the West’s most cherished projects, the Nabucco pipeline to bring Azeri natural gas westward, would go forward, telling reporters, “Turkey will definitely finalize the Nabucco project.”

    Turkey is also pressing to resolve the Russian-Georgian dispute; on Sept. 2 Gul telephoned Bush, whom he informed about Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s proposal for a Caucasus Stability Platform to restore peace and stability to the region. Rather than unilaterally pushing military aid to Georgia, Washington ought to listen closely to Turkey’s diplomatic initiatives, especially if it wants to prevent any further checkmates to its policies of developing Caspian energy projects: The Kremlin is less likely to feel threatened by a friendly soccer match than U.S. naval warships sailing in the Black Sea.

  • Nabucco Gets A Boost In Baku

    Nabucco Gets A Boost In Baku

    September 10, 2008
    By Bruce Pannier

     

    Turkey’s Hilmi Guler (left) says his country backs Nabucco.

    Western hopes for Caspian gas that doesn’t arrive via Russia are alive and well.

    The future of the Nabucco natural-gas pipeline project have appeared to be in serious jeopardy since war broke out between Russia and Georgia.

    Some export routes leading to the planned pipeline would run through Georgia, where Russian forces remain entrenched in unilaterally declared buffer zones nearly a month after an EU-brokered cease-fire.

    Of course, Nabucco’s viability also hinges to some extent on gas supplies from Caspian countries Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan, and Kazakhstan, all of whom have been courted by Russia’s Gazprom, which recently offered to purchase all of the three countries’ gas.

    But at a “strategic-cooperation conference” in Baku this week, there was broad support for participation in the Nabucco project.

    “Azerbaijan is not giving up on the Nabucco project,” Azerbaijani Industry and Energy Minister Natiq Aliyev vowed. “This is a project that has a future.”

    Turkish Energy Minister Hilmi Guler also seized on the opportunity to pledge his country’s support for Nabucco. “Nabucco will work. We will implement it,” he said. “The Nabucco project will strengthen not only Turkey’s energy security, but Europe’s too. No one should doubt it.”

    The Nabucco plan calls for a 3,300-kilometer pipeline that will transport 31 billion cubic meters of gas to Europe every year once it is fully operational.

    Crucially for Western backers like the European Union and the United States, Nabucco’s route avoids both Russian and Iranian territory entirely.

    Importance Of Diversity

    “The cooperation between these two countries [Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan] and others such as Kazakhstan to create a diversity of export possibilities helps ensure each country’s independence and economic strength,” said U.S. special representative to the EU Boyden Gray, who was at the Baku conference.

    “In addition, there is strength in numbers and in cooperation. These countries in this region are stronger and more influential acting in concert than individually,” he added. “This is especially the case given the closed nature of the Caspian. If they are united on energy issues, these countries can better promote diversification and competition for their exports and, also, over the long haul promote the diversification of their economies through expanded regional and world trade.”

    Gray noted that the United States will not benefit directly from Nabucco but that Washington hoped “that the [Caspian] region and Europe both benefit and that we, as a trading nation, will also indirectly benefit and we very much want for [Europe] to have a strong independent existence to promote your own economies to their fullest potential.”

    Despite having no “direct” interest in the Nabucco project, the United States has been engaged in substantial lobbying for the project in the Caspian region. U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney was in Azerbaijan last week to promote diversification of energy export routes.

    The Nabucco pipeline itself would start from the Georgian-Turkish and/or Turkish-Iranian borders and run to Austria. Nabucco project head Reinhard Mitschek told RFE/RL earlier this year that Nabucco does not contract for gas supplies, it is only an energy import route for Europe. It is up to shareholders in the project and other companies to arrange the purchase of gas and feed it into the Nabucco pipeline.

    But without gas from Caspian countries such as Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, and Turkmenistan it could be difficult to fill the pipeline, so the participation of those countries in Nabucco is vital.

    Enough Gas?

    The progress in Baku does not yet mean that Nabucco’s problems are all settled. Charles Esser, an energy analyst with the Brussels-based International Crisis Group, points out that Azerbaijan’s participation alone does not remove all the obstacles to Nabucco.

    “The Azeri minister was tentative in his support because he said certainly Nabucco is still on track, he said, though, that ‘we in Azerbaijan don’t have enough gas to, by ourselves, supply [Nabucco] so it will require other sources.’ [Without other sources] he was doubtful that [Nabucco] would happen,” Esser says.

    Turkmen officials at the Baku conference have not yet said what level of participation, if any, Turkmenistan would have in Nabucco. Furthermore, Turkmenistan has committed itself to pumping more gas to Russia and China in recent weeks. And Esser notes that the Russia-Georgia conflict is still fresh in the minds of many and will play a role in how Nabucco fares in the coming weeks.

    “I think there’s a renewed political push for Nabucco; however, at the same time I think commercial risk has increased,” Esser says. “There is no way around it and because of that risk investors will want guarantees. I think we’ll have to see whether the increased political will for Nabucco translates into guarantees and perhaps subsidies.”

    Nabucco is planning to hold a meeting of shareholders, potential investors, and potential suppliers in Budapest next month to discuss the pipeline project’s future.

    RFE/RL Azerbaijani Service Director Kenan Aliyev contributed to this report

  • Scholar given national grant award [ATATURK]

    Scholar given national grant award [ATATURK]

    Sept. 10, 2008

    By Jacqueline Deavenport
    Reporter

    A member of the history department will be conducting research in Turkey this year, thanks to a Fulbright grant.

    Dr. George W. Gawrych, an associate professor, was awarded a Fulbright Senior Researcher Scholar grant and will begin his research Sept. 15, said Jamie Lawrence, a Public Affairs Officer in the U.S. Department of State Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs.

    “It is a tremendous honor for me to receive this grant,” Gawrych said in a press release. “I distinctly remember growing up with a great admiration for Senator Fulbright. He was one of my heroes in the political world, and I am thrilled to have this opportunity of working with scholars in Turkey while conducting the ten months of focused research.”

    Gawrych said he remembers being inspired in junior high school by Arkansas Sen. William James Fulbright, a man committed to finding peace and understanding between nations through education.

    Considerations such as professional qualifications, lecturing activity, research activity, language proficiency, and experience abroad, determine who is awarded a Fulbright Scholarship. The Fulbright program was created in 1946, and there are several different types of Fulbright programs for students and educators. Gawrych is the fifth Baylor professor to receive a Fulbright award, according to the press release.

    His research will focus on one of Turkey’s political historical figures, Mustafa Kemal Ataturk. He is trying to understand Ataturk’s career as both a military commander and a statesman. “There is this larger vision, higher purpose that drives him,” said Gawrych.

    Ataturk was an army commander and a revolutionary who led the Turkish national movement, which, in turn, became the Turkish War of Independence. As a statesman, he instituted political, cultural and economic reforms.

    For 19 years, Gawrych taught at the U.S. Army Command and General Staff College at The United States Military Academy at West Point, where he first became interested in the subject of his research.

    Upon coming to Baylor, he had an opportunity to focus on sources associated with Ataturk.

    For nine months, Gawrych will be pouring over primary sources, working primarily in archives, libraries and research institutes in Ankara and Istanbul. He will also be visiting important battle sites.

    Gawrych said his biggest challenges will be sifting through the masses of documentation and deciphering hand-written and short-hand written documents.

    Dr. Jeffrey Hamilton, department chair of the history department, said Gawrych will help bring positive attention to Baylor.

    “We’re very pleased for Dr. Gawrych and Baylor, because the Fulbright Research fellowships are one of the most competitive and prestigious awards that an academic can receive,” he said. “While both faculty and staff will miss Dr. Gawrych, his presence in Turkey will raise the profile of Baylor as a whole and in Middle East studies.”

    Gawrych’s wife, Joan, will be accompanying him on his trip to Turkey, and there they will celebrate their 35th wedding anniversary.

    Source: www.baylor.edu,

  • Turkish Migration to the United States: From Ottoman Times to the Present

    Turkish Migration to the United States: From Ottoman Times to the Present

    From: A DENIZ BALGAMIS <balgamis@facstaff.wisc.edu>
    List Editor: Mark Stein <stein@MUHLENBERG.EDU>
    Editor’s Subject: H-TURK: New book [D Balgamis]
    Author’s Subject: H-TURK: New book [D Balgamis]
    Date Written: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 12:21:01 -0400
    Date Posted: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 12:21:01 -0400

     
    Dear Colleagues,

    The Center for Turkish Studies at the University of Wisconsin, Madison
    announces the publication of a new book titled “Turkish Migration to the
    United States: From Ottoman Times to the Present” edited by A. Deniz
    Balgamis and Kemal H. Karpat.

    You may order the book from the University of Wisconsin Press website
    at

    CONTENTS

    Introduction
    Kemal H. Karpat

    PART I SOURCES AND APPROACHES TO OTTOMAN/
    TURKISH MIGRATION TO THE UNITED STATES

    The History of Turkish Migrations: A Research Agenda
    Rudolph J. Vecoli

    Forging New Links in the Early Turkish Migration Chain: The U.S.
    Census and early Twentieth Century Ships’ Manifests
    John J. Grabowski

    PART II HISTORICAL OVERVIEW AND CASE STUDIES

    The Emigration from the Ottoman Empire to America
    Nedim İpek and K. Tuncer Çağlayan

    Reflections of the First Muslim Immigration to America in Ottoman
    Documents
    Mehmet Uğur Ekinci

    From Anatolia to the New World: The First Anatolian Immigrants to
    America
    Rıfat N. Bali

    Conflict and Cooperation: Diverse Ottoman Ethnic Groups in Peabody,
    Massachusetts
    Işıl Acehan

    “Home Away from Home: Early Turkish Migration to the United States
    Reflected in the Lives and Times of Bayram Mehmet and Hazım Vasfi”
    Emrah Şahin

    PART III RECENT IMMIGRATION

    New Migration, Old Trends: Turkish Immigrants and Segmented
    Assimilation in the United States
    Mustafa Saatçi

    A Profile of Immigrant Women from Turkey in the United States,
    1900-2000
    Ayşem R. Şenyürekli

    Migration from Giresun to the United States: The Role of Regional
    Identity
    Lisa DiCarlo

    Turkish Immigrants in the United States: Men, Women and Children
    Müzeyyen Güler

    The Turks Finally Establish a Community in the United States
    Kemal H. Karpat

    Turkish Islam (with Introduction by Kemal H. Karpat)
    Lloyd A. Fallers

    Contributors

    Bibliography

    Index

    ————-
    Deniz Balgamis, Ph.D.
    University of Wisconsin-Madison