Category: USA

Turkey could be America’s most important regional ally, above Iraq, even above Israel, if both sides manage the relationship correctly.

  • AMERIKADA SECIM HILELERI VE OBAMA – A Mighty Hoax from ACORN Grows

    AMERIKADA SECIM HILELERI VE OBAMA – A Mighty Hoax from ACORN Grows

    by Michael Winship

    ACORN and election fraud. Hang on. As soon as I can get the alligator that crawled out of my toilet back into the New York City sewers where it belongs, I can turn my attention to this very important topic.

    You see, the ACORN “election fraud” story is one of those urban legends, like fake moon landings and alligators in the sewers, and it appears three or four weeks before every recent national election with the regularity of the swallows returning to Capistrano.

    First, the basics: ACORN, which stands for the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, is an activist group working with low and moderate income families that, among many other things, registers voters. To do this they hire people to go around signing up the unregistered, killing two birds with one stone — giving employment to people who need it (some with criminal records) and providing the opportunity to vote to members of minority communities whose voices all too often go unheard.

    What happens is that some of those hired to do the registering, who are paid by the name, make people up. As a result, you’ll discover that among the registrants are such obvious fakes as Mickey Mouse and the starting line-up of the Dallas Cowboys, among others.

    This is where the Republican meme kicks in. As they have in past elections (although now louder and more angrily than ever), the GOP has made ACORN the red flag du jour as the party tries to mobilize its conservative base and, allegedly, attempts to suppress the vote and distract attention from accusations of election tampering made against them, too.

    The charge is that these fake registrations will create havoc at the polls. On Tuesday morning, former Republican Senators John Danforth and Warren Rudman, chairs of Senator McCain’s Honest and Open Elections Committee, held a press conference and described the results of the bad seeds in ACORN’s registration program as “a potential nightmare.” Danforth said he was concerned “that this election night and the days that follow will be a rerun of 2000, and even worse than 2000.”

    John McCain raised it at Wednesday night’s final debate and went further, adding, “We need to know the full extent of Senator Obama’s relationship with ACORN, who [sic] is now on the verge of maybe perpetrating one of the greatest frauds in voter history in this country, maybe destroying the fabric of democracy…”

    Obama replied, “ACORN is a community organization. Apparently, what they have done is they were paying people to go out and register folks. And apparently, some of the people who were out there didn’t really register people; they just filled out a bunch of names. Had nothing to do with us. We were not involved.”

    Which is not to say Obama has not been associated with ACORN in the recent past. He has. As he said in the debate, as a lawyer, he joined with the group in partnership with the US Justice Department to implement a motor voter registration law in Illinois — allowing folks to register to vote at their local DMV. His work as a community organizer bought him into contact with ACORN, the organization received money from the Woods Fund while he was a board member there and his presidential campaign gave ACORN more than $800,000 to help with get out the vote campaigns during the primary season — but not, apparently, for registration drives.

    All of this distracts from several important points. ACORN has registered 1.3 million voters, and maintains that in virtually every instance they are the ones who have reported the incidents of fraud.

    As the organization asserted in a response to Senator McCain, “ACORN hired 13,000 field workers to register people to vote. In any endeavor of this size, some people will engage in inappropriate conduct. ACORN has a zero tolerance policy and terminated any field workers caught engaging in questionable activity. At the end of the day, as ACORN is paying these people to register voters, it is ACORN that is defrauded.” Arrests have been made, as well they should be.

    Add to this the simple fact that registration fraud is not election fraud. Seventy-five, made-up people who are registered as, say, “Brad Pitt,” are not likely going to show up at some polling place on November 4 to vote in the election. Because they don’t exist. (Besides, Angelina would never give them time off from babysitting duties.)

    Granted, there are ways to mail in an absentee ballot under a fake name and, too, from time to time some joker is going to come to the polls and try to bluff his or her way in. But despite the charge that thousands and thousands of fakes will flood the machines and throw the count, it does not happen very often. And according to ACORN, “Even RNC [Republican National Committee] General Counsel Sean Cairncross has recently acknowledged he is not aware of a single improper vote cast as a result of bad cards submitted in the course of an organized voter registration effort.”

    Not that this has stopped the GOP from banging the same drum every national election. And amnesiac members of the media and some government agencies from buying into it every time. Last year, The New York Times reported that the federal Election Assistance Commission, created by the Help America Vote Act, legislation enacted after the Florida debacle, was told by a pair of experts — one Republican, the other described as having “liberal leanings” — that there was not that much fraud to be found. But their conclusions were downplayed.

    As per the Times, “Though the original report said that among experts ‘there is widespread but not unanimous agreement that there is little polling place fraud,’ the final version of the report released to the public concluded in its executive summary that ‘there is a great deal of debate on the pervasiveness of fraud.’”

    Which raises the ongoing investigation of the Justice Department’s firing of those eight US attorneys shortly after President Bush’s re-election. It shouldn’t be forgotten that despite official explanations, half of them were let go after refusing to prosecute vote fraud charges demanded by Republicans. The attorneys had determined there was little or no evidence of skullduggery; certainly not enough to prosecute.

    (In an interview with Talking Points Memo on Thursday, one of those fired, David Iglesias, reacted to reports that the FBI has launched an investigation of ACORN: “I’m astounded that this issue is being trotted out again. Based on what I saw in 2004 and 2006, it’s a scare tactic.”)

    What’s equally if not more scary are continued allegations of Republican attempts at “caging” minority voters — making challenge lists of African- and Hispanic-Americans registered in heavily Democratic districts. Just this week, a Federal judge in Michigan ruled that voters could not be purged from the rolls in that state simply because their mailing address was invalid — this followed a failed attempt by a Michigan Republican county chairman to use a list of foreclosed homes as the basis of voter challenges.

    This comes on the heels of a recent report from the Brennan Center at New York University documenting how state officials — often with the best of intentions — purge huge numbers of perfectly legal voters from the rolls.

    As my colleague Bill Moyers reported, “Hundreds of thousands of legal voters may have been dumped in recent years, many without ever being notified.” The report describes a “process that is shrouded in secrecy, prone to error, and vulnerable to manipulation.”

    Hardly reassuring words if you want democracy to work, and sadly, not an urban legend, but the simple truth.

    Michael Winship is senior writer of the weekly public affairs program Bill Moyers Journal, which airs Friday night on PBS. Check local airtimes or comment at The Moyers Blog at www.pbs.org/moyers.
  • Karabakh Deal ‘Possible’ In 2008

    Karabakh Deal ‘Possible’ In 2008

     

     

     

     

     

    By Ruzanna Stepanian

    A senior U.S. official said late Friday that the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict could be resolved before the end of this year and that the likelihood of another Armenian-Azerbaijani war has decreased since the recent crisis in Georgia.

    “It’s possible,” Assistant Secretary of State Daniel Fried told RFE/RL when asked about chances of a breakthrough in the Karabakh peace process in the coming weeks. “But possible does not mean inevitable, and there are hard decisions that have to be made on both sides. If this conflict were easy to resolve, it would have been resolved already.”

    Fried argued that Armenia and Azerbaijan were already very close to cutting a peace deal when their presidents held U.S.-mediated talks on the Florida island of Key West in early 2001. The deal fell through in the following weeks.

    Commenting on possible attempts by one of the conflicting parties to resolve the Karabakh dispute by force, he said: “I think that danger, which always exists, has somewhat receded because the war in Georgia reminded everyone in this region how terrible war is. There are some who are always tempted to talk in fiery language. But war is no joke. It’s a bad option.”

    The U.S. diplomat spoke to RFE/RL after holding talks in Yerevan with President Serzh Sarkisian, Prime Minister Tigran Sarkisian and representatives of Armenia’s main opposition alliance. Efforts by the United States and other international mediators to help settle Karabakh conflict were high on the agenda of the talks.

    Fried said he also urged the Armenian leaders to release opposition members that were arrested following the February presidential election on what the U.S. considers politically motivated charges. “My message was it’s important to get past this and resolve it,” he said. “The longer people remain detained, the longer there will be a cloud.”

    Fried said the Sarkisian administration should “deal with the consequences” of Armenia’s post-election unrest with the kind of “great leadership and courage” that it has shown in seeking to improve relations with Turkey. He also made the point that the democratization of Armenia’s political system will be a “slow process.”

    “Obviously, Armenia has a great deal to do to build democracy,” he said. “Let’s be realistic. This is going to be a slow, incremental process. It needs to go in the right direction and it needs to move forward.”

  • U.S. Government Will Nationalize the Banks

    U.S. Government Will Nationalize the Banks

    News from the Votemaster

     

    U.S. Government Will Nationalize the Banks

    Just a week after announcing that it was absolutely essential for the government to buy up all the toxic mortgages and that no other solution was possible, treasury secretary Henry Paulson has now ditched his plan and is going to (partially) buy the banks. This move effectively nationalizes them. The British government did this over the weekend and it led to a huge stock market rally in Europe. Paulson II caused the Dow Jones index to jump 936 points yesterday, its biggest one-day gain in history. While Paulson will never admit it, the plan to buy the banks was originally proposed by the liberal Democrats. However, he steamrollered them into submission and they voted for his plan because without it. he said, the sky would fall. Government ownership of the banks is a hallmark of socialism, of course. Who would have thought that the October surprise was for the Bush administration to come out of the closet and become overt socialists three weeks before a hotly contested election? The reaction of the Republican rank and file is yet to come. No doubt this subject will get a lot of play in tomorrow’s third and final presidential debate.

    Paul Krugman Wins the Nobel Prize for Economics

    Princeton professor of economics and New York Times op-ed columnist has won the Nobel Prize for economics. Krugman has been a vociferous and unrelenting critic of George Bush and John McCain, especially their economic policies. While Krugman got the prize for his work on the impact of global trade, this award will only enhance his prestige and increase the size of his megaphone.

  • AMERICA:  Where Do We Go From Here?

    AMERICA: Where Do We Go From Here?

    POOR  RICHARD’S   REPORT                860-522-7171

                                                                                    800-821-6665-watts

                                                                                    860-315-7413- *

                                                                                    860-208-0258Cell

     

                                 Where Do We Go From Here?

     

                The Oct 11-12 weekend edition of the Financial Times (the Salmon Colored paper) had all negative articles on the global stock markets. Not one positive one I could find. The NYSE reported 2,500 new lows out of 3,400 traded. The G-7 held an emergency meeting in Washington DC. With the pendulum so far to one side it has to swing back. Today Monday, Oct 13, 2008 at noon there are only 2 new lows being made and the markets are soaring. It will be a long time before we see the new highs in the popular averages. We are being  taught a valuable lesson about greed.

                This is just a rally or a dead cat bounce. Imagine a farmer haying his field for the last time before winter sets in. The birds will flock to pick over the bugs that have been exposed and they will grow slowly as the temperature cools down. When the frigid weather sets in it is time for reorganization. We have just been hayed.  Just like the farmer’s field the market will come back under new leadership.

                Congress can do what ever they please, but this is a free country with entrepreneurs seeking their pot of gold at the end of the rainbow. In this free spirit country we will seek new avenues for long term growth. If one invested in Wal-Mart in 1970 today that person would have made 5,300 times on their investment Just keep your eyes open around you.

                All the learned men are coming forth with idealistic reforms for the financial reform. They won’t be able to put humpty dumpty back together again. They don’t have the right glue.

                We need a comprehensive reorganization and reform of our global markets. Sounds impossible? Well, since everyone is down globally there is a sensible way to get it going.

                Congress should expand the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) from three members to 7 or 9. The other members would be made up of leading financial experts from member nations of the G-7.  Each member would have to be approved by a special US Senate committee to make sure their heads are screwed on right. Then they will be able to take our reforms back to their individual countries. Countries that do not follow our examples will not be recognized by participating countries. They will be playing an expensive form of Monopoly.

                The reason for this is if one country has an UPTICK RULE for short sales then the other members would be encouraged to enforce it on their own markets. The mandate should be “For the Common Good” and not how much money will be made. Get rich quick schemes attract individuals with smelly clothes and bad manners.    The reason for our own breakdown starts in Washington. Our Political parties were more intent on destroying the other instead of improving our lot. There is no love or forgiveness in Washington.  

                Events in Washington determine what direction our economy goes. That in turn affects the market place. We must keep watch on our politicians. The media is all over Sarah Palin, but ignoring errors made by Senator Biden during the vice presidential debate. He is chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee too. I think he has the beginning of Alzheimer’s.

                Now I have maintained for several months the Uptick Rule as many readers know.

                In the 1990’s the freedom to know was passed on to securities research. This was interpreted that the general public should know what a select few knew. It is a noble idea, but not very practable in the long term. Many corporations have no idea what they are going to earn. If they guide the investor in the wrong direction they can face stiff fines or a day or two in jail. So they give out in the ball park figures that as the year goes by they keep refining it. Brokerage firms that had paid a pretty penny for good analysts were up against the wall. The general public did not know who to believe.

                Here is how it worked in the past and should work in the future. An analyst calls on company A and meets with the high ranking officer. They discuss each division of the company and the officers tell the analyst if he is hi or low. Then the analyst leaves and writes up a report that is sent back to the company for approval. Then more notes are sent back and forth until they both agree on the figures. Now both sides know what company A can earn. The research manager approves the report and it is finally published. Here the research firm should have three days to contact their clients. After that grace period the information can be made public for a nominal fee depending upon the number of written pages. Then management is able to correctly guide other analyst in the right direction.

                Repeal the Investment Company Act of 1940. This was for the protection of the baby industry of mutual funds. Some baby! It is a gorilla messing up markets. Take away their hidden and real fees and you will see a better performance. That industry is top heavy with unnecessary “management”.  They should trade like Exchange Traded Funds (ETF’s) with normal stock exchange commissions.

                No net trades. Every investor should know how much he is paying for the security. It is called Transparency and bond traders hate it.

                Finally the media must be reined in. An analyst once told me that when he goes “on the air” he comes up with his most speculative idea. If it hits he has a chance of being in the big time, if he is wrong everyone will forget. (Except for the analyst who wrote up “Gold is Dead!”  when it was $40 and ounce!)

                There is one ad that over the years has met all ethical and legal requirements and that is the Oppenheim Mutual Fund ads. The one with the four hands and they say an intelligible disclaimer at the end.

                Two Classic ads were Merrill Lynch’s “We are bullish on America”. They did not say the stock market. This was during the bear market of 1973-1982. The second one was “Smith Barney – they make money the old fashion way – They earn it!”  Smith Barney did not say you were going to make money. 

                If one had done the opposite of 99% of the “talking heads” that person would be way ahead.  I consider commodity ads outrageous. “Gold has never gone down” is one ad that turns my stomach inside out. 1982 into 1990’s was a downtrend.  The most speculative exchange has or implies you can not lose. Pure trash!

                Business leaders fined or jailed should apply to the spouse too. That will slow everyone down. One can not hide money in family accounts.

                Our Congress will pass punitive laws in order to insure reelection, pounding their hollow chests while bellowing “vote for me”. Meanwhile a lot of good folks will be out of jobs, and the recession could deepen.

                The shock and the horror that has happened will take years for the market to recover. In the meantime old leaders will fade away and new spring growth will emerge with beautiful colors and soon what5 has past will be ancient history except to a painful few.

                One final thought. To increase consumer confidence and to help the “little guy” instead of just the mighty institutions, we should bring back the usury laws15%-30 on credit cards is downright immoral. If the Democrats are so intent on helping the poor; why not help the ones going to the “poorhouse”?

     

     

                                        Goodbye inflationHello Deflation

          

     

                                                                                                    Tuesday, October 14, 2008

     

     

     

     

    This report has been prepared from original sources and data we believe reliable but we make no representation to its accuracy or completeness. Coburn & Meredith Inc its subsidiaries and or officers may from time to time acquire, hold, sell a position discussed in this publications, and we may act as principal for our own account or as agent for both the buyer and seller.                           


     

    This is my new Home/Office number in Eastford Ct.

    I can be reached any where from 8:30am to 8:00pm a cell phone can not be used for transmitting orders.

      The cell phone is always on my person, but like me has to be recharged every night.

  • 18th Annual Houston Turkish Festival held in US

    18th Annual Houston Turkish Festival held in US

     

     
     

    [ 07 Oct 2008 17:57 ]

    Baku – APA. 18th Annual Houston Turkish Festival was held in the US. Press service of State Committee on Work with Azerbaijanis Living Abroad told APA that dance group of Houston Azerbaijanis’ Society also participated in the festival. 4000 people attended the festival. Our countrymen performed national dances “Chichekler”, “Uzum”, “Naz-naz” and “Arzu”.
    Houston-Azerbaijan Organization was established in 2004.

  • The Turkish alliance Anti-terrorist efforts and dividends

    The Turkish alliance Anti-terrorist efforts and dividends

    Tulin Daloglu
    Tuesday, October 7, 2008

     
    Last week, the House stumbled before passing the bailout bill. But in the end, its way was eased by the overwhelming bipartisan approval of the Senate, which gave Treasury Secretary Hanry Paulson what he wanted, more or less. Whether it’s the best solution to the financial crisis is open to debate. Clearly, there is a kind of connection between the war in Iraq and the tumultuous markets. In this election season, the $600 billion already spent in Iraq and the ongoing $10 billion a month being spent there is under increased scrutiny.
     
    But historically, the financial cost of a military action has never affected American will on the battlefield. “The antiwar people in Vietnam constantly talked about how much it was costing,” said John Mueller of Ohio State University at a recent event at the Brookings Institution. “But it’s basically blood that matters, actually being killed.” As the loss of American lives in Iraq significantly declined since the surge, Mr. Mueller argued, Americans’ approval or disapproval becomes less relevant; the people are able to tolerate it. “And so it may very well be that John McCain is right when he says we can stay there 100 years,” Mr. Mueller said. “Basically, if Americans aren’t being killed, no one cares in the least where they are.”
     
    The key issue about the war is neither the monetary cost nor whether or not going to war was the right decision. There is no bringing back the more than 4,000 American lives or the hundreds of thousands of Iraqi lives lost. Sens. Barack Obama and John McCain differ on how they would end the war. Neither of their plans can assure the outcome. But the other countries of the region have no choice but to bear the burdens that the war has created there.
     
    Turkey, for example, is a NATO ally of the United States – which has been attacked by Kurdish separatist terrorists who have found safe heaven in Iraq. Last week, the PKK once again attacked a Turkish border post, killing 15 Turkish soldiers. The funerals were held all over the country and broadcast live on Sunday, marking the end of Eid in this Muslim country and bringing together hundreds of thousands to pray for those lost in the attack. Such funerals have been seen in Turkish living rooms for more than 15 years now. Turks are fed up with this war; more than 30,000 of their people have been lost, and there is no end is in sight.
     
    Occasionally, there are arguments about the cost of fighting terrorism. If there were peace, that money could be spent in the Kurdish areas, where the PKK attacks most often. It’s the same as the American arguments about what the money spent in Iraq could have funded. The Turkish state surely has not always fought the separatist Kurdish terrorists with the right tools. They refused to acknowledge the Kurdish reality for too long. Yet if this trouble were to require solely domestic solutions, the situation could be less discombobulated today.
     
    Historically, the Western powers wanted to build an independent Kurdistan from the ashes of the Ottoman Empire – and that continues to haunt modern Turkey. Vahit Erdem, a member of the ruling Justice and Development party (AKP), told me in a recent interview in his Turkish Parliament office that the initial U.S. intention was to establish an independent Kurdish state. “But in time they saw it would create more trouble in the region than the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, [and] the U.S. changed its position,” Mr. Erdem said. “Now it sincerely supports Iraqi territorial integrity. In the beginning, they were – frankly – not supporting it.” Turkish public opinion has not yet been convinced, though.
     
    Now, as the region watches the U.S. presidential election, it isn’t clear which candidate would be more sympathetic. Both candidates have pros and cons. But it’s clear that while the debate in Ankara focuses on stabilizing Iraq, continued cross-border PKK attacks on Turkey raise the possibility that Turkey will launch a major incursion into Iraq in pursuit of PKK terrorists. While the United States calls for restraint, it launches raids into Pakistan’s tribal beltway for the same reason: to pursue terrorists that carry attacks into Afghanistan. This is an incredible double standard. It would be wise for the United States to physically go after the PKK terrorists in the Iraqi territories.
     
    While an independent Kurdistan will not be built by a rogue Kurdish terrorist group, a possible Turkish offensive which may not be limited to air strikes will halt Turkey’s accession talks with the European Union and strain its relationship with the United States. Then Turkey will be totally lost.
     
    While it will take years to stabilize Iraq, the United States needs Turkey for the foreseeable future to protect its national interests.
     
    Tulin Daloglu is a free-lance writer