Category: America

  • Armenian supporters skeptical of ties between Turkey, Indian tribes

    Armenian supporters skeptical of ties between Turkey, Indian tribes

    Armenian supporters skeptical of ties between Turkey, Indian tribes

    By MICHAEL DOYLE

    McClatchy Newspapers

    The perennial political fighting between Armenian-Americans and Turkey has migrated to Indian country.

    In a diplomatically creative but controversial move, Turkey wants preferential access to start commercial ventures on selected U.S. tribal lands. In theory, tribes would get business and Turkey would gain friends.

    “We’re trying to build bridges with other communities,” G. Lincoln McCurdy, the president of the Turkish Coalition of America, said in an interview. “If this works, it would be good for everybody.”

    But not everybody thinks so. Lawmakers in states with large Armenian-American populations, such as California and New Jersey, think a legislative proposal that’s now before the House of Representatives extends an undeserved favor to a country still associated with a long-ago slaughter.

    “We could not let that pass … without some acknowledgment of the Armenian genocide,” Rep. Jim Costa, D-Calif., said.

    The bill in question would allow six Indian tribes to lease land to Turkish companies without securing the usual, often time-consuming Bureau of Indian Affairs approvals. The tribes would be selected competitively by the Interior Department, and would develop their own guidelines for leasing land him.

    In this Capitol Hill fight, regional loyalties and ethnic politics could matter more than party lines.

    When the House Natural Resources Committee approved the legislation Nov. 17 on a 27-15 vote, Costa and Rep. Jeff Denham, R-Calif., united in opposition. The Democrat and the Republican represent portions of California’s Central Valley, which is heavily populated by Armenian-Americans.

    On the other side, bill supporter Republican Rep. Don Young is a longtime champion of his home state’s Alaska Natives. The bill’s author, conservative Rep. Tom Cole, R-Okla., is a member of the Chickasaw. Another supporter, liberal Democratic Rep. Jay Inslee of Washington state, is running for governor in that state, which is home to 103,000 American Indians.

    Like much that happens on Capitol Hill, the bill dubbed the Indian Tribal Trade and Investment Demonstration Project Act of 2011 rides atop multiple motives. It now goes to the full House for a vote.

    “It definitely broadens (Turkey’s) political base,” McCurdy said, “and it increases the opportunity for Turkish companies to establish operations in this country.”

    A broader political base, in turn, could aid Turkey in recurring Capitol Hill conflicts with Armenian-Americans. In raw population, Armenian-Americans widely outnumber Turkish-Americans. Turkey, though, enjoys considerable high-level clout as an important NATO country.

    Nearly every year, these competing forces are on display as lawmakers press for an Armenian genocide resolution that takes note of the massacres that took place during the Ottoman Empire’s dying days. The resolution routinely fails but keeps coming back; this year’s version has 84 House co-sponsors.

    It’s in this context that the Native American investment bill reflects Turkey’s cultivation of tribes.

    Over the past two years, Turkey has sponsored a number of visits by Indian leaders. In November 2010, for instance, it hosted some 20 Native Americans for a week, including representatives of Idaho’s Coeur d’Alene Tribe and Washington state’s Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation.

    “This is the first foreign country that has shown interest in investing with – cooperation with – a tribe to improve their economic lot,” Young said at the House committee hearing Nov. 17.

    In a similar vein, Turkish universities sponsor scholarships for Native American students, and Turkish officials have met with Indian leaders in Los Angeles and Seattle. Last March, a top Turkish Trade Ministry official became the first foreign representative to speak at an annual Las Vegas conference on Native American economic development.

    “I have no idea why they’re being so nice to Native Americans,” Rep. Frank Pallone, D-N.J., said during the House hearing. “I’m sure there’s some bad underlying reason or something that they’re trying to gain.”

    via Armenian supporters skeptical of ties between Turkey, Indian tribes – KansasCity.com.

  • U.S., Turkey, Even Israel, Have Role in Arab Spring

    U.S., Turkey, Even Israel, Have Role in Arab Spring

    Written by David Rosenberg
    Published Sunday, December 11, 2011

    ArabSpring

    So say observers, even as they warn the influence will be limited

    Countries outside the Arab Spring and looking in have a lot to contribute to the region’s progress to democracy, but they should be aware of the limits of their ability to predict how it will all end much less to steer events.

    That was the message of four speakers addressing the issue “The New Middle East: A Dream or a Nightmare?” at the Globes Business conference in Tel Aviv on Sunday.

    The turmoil that has swept through the region is driven principally by domestic forces and issues, but outside powers ranging from the West, to Israel and Turkey and the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) have a role to play in fostering democracy and economic development.

    “The West has a moral and strategic role to play, but so does Israel,” said Ghanem Nuseiba, the founder and director of Cornerstone Global Associates, a London-based strategy and management consulting firm. He said the key for ensuring that the Arab Spring created democratic societies is by ensuring economic development.

    Calls for freedom and democracy have captured the world’s attention, but the grievances that spurred rebellion in Egypt and elsewhere were rooted in poverty and unemployment. While the Arab world has a way to go to evolving high technology economies, it can learn from Israel’s experience. “The Arab world sees how Israel has used technology to develop its economy,” Nuseiba said.

    The U.S. sees its mission in facing the challenges of the Arab Spring in both fostering economic growth and democracy, said Dan Shapiro, the U.S. ambassador to Israel, at the conference. He admitted that there was no certainty that the forces of democracy would prevail, but insisted that helping to bring down autocrats – even those who had been reliable allies of the West – is in America’s best interest.

    The region’s dictators had justified their rule as a choice between the stability they imposed and progress. “Today the real choice is between reform and unrest,” Shapiro said.

    “The bottom line is that change in the Middle East and North Africa contain within it both risks and opportunities,” he said. “If these changes lead to true democracy… they can very much be in America’s national interest. But political transitions can be unstable and volatile – and they can be hijacked.”

    Nevertheless, the U.S. is undertaking direct economic assistance to Egypt and Tunisia, the two countries where regime transition is furthest along. The White House is working with Congress to create enterprise funds for new businesses and offer political risk insurance through the government’s Overseas Private Investment Corporation. It is encouraging international agencies like the International Monetary Fund and World Bank to help, too, he said.

    Shapiro said turned Nuseiba’s formula around, contending that democratic rule would not only create governments more favorable to the West and to Israel but foster economic development. “Democracies make for strong and stable partners, they trade more and they innovate more,” he said. “They channel people’s energy away from extremism and toward political and civic engagement.”

    Shapiro reiterated Washington’s view that Islamic parties cannot be kept out of the democratic process, but they have to respect certain values – rejecting violence, respecting the rule of law, freedom of speech and the rights of women and minorities. “We will judge the political actors in these countries not by what they say but what they do,” he said.

    “We must try to seize the opportunities, but we must undertake this with humility … the Arab future will be decided by the Arabs,” he said.

    Turkey was redirecting its trade and diplomacy toward the Middle East even before the Arab Spring erupted, but Yasar Yakis, a former Turkish foreign minister, warned that Ankara’s ability to influence events is constrained by its history. It stood aloof from the Middle East for some 80 years, so it does not have the expertise and experience that the West has in the region, even if Turks themselves better understand the Arab “mentality.”

    Moreover, the Arab world remembers Turkish rule from the Ottoman period “negatively” and is wary of any sign that Ankara is trying to wield too much influence. “Arab countries do not like interference from others in Arab affairs and Turkish interference is [regarded as] more sensitive than from other non-Arab countries,” Yakis said.

    He acknowledged that the West faces difficult dilemma of choosing between supporting old regimes that violate human rights and letting potentially hostile Islamist governments come to power through elections. But, Yakis said the West should come down on the side of change, agreeing with Shapiro that in the long run democracies are more likely to be stable, interfere less with their neighbors and, as open societies, become freer and more tolerant.

    “If elections in the Arab Spring comply with the minimum standards of modern democracy, it would not be fair to ignore the results,” he said. “Ignoring them would harm the leverage of the international community over these countries.”

    Israel Elad-Altman, a senior fellow at the Institute for Policy and Strategy at Israel’s Herzilya Interdisciplinary Center, discounted the influence Turkey has as a role model of a country that has remained democratic and become increasingly prosperous economically under the rule of the Islamist Justice and Development Party.

    “Many people say the Arab countries should follow the Turkish example,” he said. “But their leading party isn’t really Islamist …Turkey has been secularizing for the last 80 years. Islam remains strong in the countryside, but secularism is strong, too. That hasn’t been the case in the Arab countries.”

    Elad-Altman gave a more pessimistic outlook on the Arab Spring, saying that Islamist parties are unlikely to moderate their anti-Western and anti-Israel stances if they come to power. He said he foresees an ideological debate that pits those saying that the goals of decades of struggle should never be jettisoned against those who say the imperatives of consolidating rule and the economy demand compromises, such as encouraging Western tourism.

    “It’s an open question which of these approaches will prevail, but I doubt we’ll see major ideological concessions,” he said.

    On the positive side, he said, the Arab Spring has strengthened the GCC, which has shifted from a passive political role into taking an assertive stance that is counterbalancing the influence of Iran.

    Another positive outcome is the weakening of Iran’s influence. The Shiite state had hoped to exploit the U.S. withdrawal from Iraq later this month to assert to its influence on its neighbor, creating a zone influence stretching across the region to President Bashar Al-Assad’s Syria and Hizbullah-dominated Lebanon and the Hamas-ruled Gaza Strip.

    But the unrest in Syria, now in its ninth month and showing no signs of letting up, has forced Iran to moderate its ambitions as it tries to shore up its ally in Damascus. “The Arab Spring has deal a major blow to the axis of resistance,” Elad-Altman said.

  • Wedding: Enis and Lindsay Vosburg Ocal

    Wedding: Enis and Lindsay Vosburg Ocal

    4ee0f28d0cb81Lindsay Michelle Vosburg and Enis Egemen Ocal of Cordova, Tenn., were united in marriage Aug. 20, 2011, at The Glen Iris Inn at Letchworth State Park, Castile. The Honorable Michelle Post performed the ceremony for the daughter of John and Deborah Vosburg of Silver Springs and the son of Guzin and Akar Ocal of Eskisehir, Turkey.

    The bride wore an ivory, strapless A-line gown. The gown was satin with a tulle overlay, embellished with beadwork, pearls, swarovski crystals, lace and 3d floral appliqués. Her headpiece was a silver tiara decorated with pearls and swarovski crystals. An ivory fingertip length veil featuring two tiers with beaded metallic edging and floral motifs that coordinated with the gown. She carried a bouquet of ivory roses, pink calla and rubrum lilies, orchids, purple miniature carnations and stephanotis.

    Sarah Parente of Hellertown, Pa., cousin of the bride, was matron of honor. Huseyin Cahit Akin of San Diego, Calif., was best man.

    Bridesmaids were Amanda Borden and Melissa Pownall, both of Cary, N.C.

    Ushers were Goker Aydin of Bloomington, Ind., Taner Kaya of Boston, Mass. and Burak Guneralp of College Station, Texas.

    Audrey Vosburg of Springwater, niece of the bride was flower girl. Eli Vosburg of Springwater, nephew of the bride, was the ringbearer.

    A reception followed at The Glen Iris Inn at Letchworth State Park, where out-of-state guests attended from Canada, Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, North Carolina, Indiana, Tennessee, Texas, New Mexico, Florida, California and Washington.

    The bride is a 2003 graduate of Letchworth Central School, a 2007 graduate of Lycoming College in Williamsport, Pa., with a bachelor of arts degree in archaeology and history and a 2011 graduate of The University of Memphis in Memphis, Tenn. with a master’s of arts degree in art history.

    The bridegroom is a 1997 graduate of Bogazici University in Instanbul, Turkey with a bachelor of science degree in industrial engineering, a 1999 graduate of The University of Manchester in Manchester, England with master of science degree in marketing, a 2000 graduate of Bogazici University in Istanbul, Turkey with a master of business administration degree and a 2005 graduate of Washington University in St. Louis, Mo. with a master of science degree in business administration. He is a revenue management professional at FedEx Services in Memphis, Tenn.

    After a honeymoon to Istanbul, Turkey, the couple is living in Cordona, Tenn.

    via Wedding: Enis and Lindsay Vosburg Ocal – The Daily News Online: Weddings.

  • US Drone Lost Over Iran Was On CIA Operation

    US Drone Lost Over Iran Was On CIA Operation

    The US military has said a missing unmanned spyplane was involved in a joint CIA military operation on Afghanistan’s border with Iran.

    The Pentagon has admitted the RQ 170 Sentinel drone is lost somewhere in Iran.

    But the US disputes Iranian claims to have shot down the state-of-the-art spy aircraft.

    An unverified report on Iranian state radio has claimed that the US drone was flying deep inside the country’s airspace, over the eastern town of Kashmar, some 140 miles (225km) from the Afghan border.

    News of the CIA involvement is causing controversy in Washington.

    Congressman Dennis Kucinich told Sky News the involvement of America’s spy agency was a worrying development.

    “We have to be very careful that we don’t stumble into a wider war here. If we are in Iran’s airspace with anything that belongs to the US, that’s a provocation,” he said.

    The revelation coincides with speculation that a covert war is being waged in Iran by America and Israel to thwart Iranian nuclear ambitions.

    A series of events remain unexplained. Iranian scientists have been assassinated, including one case where a man was killed by a bomb strapped to his vehicle by a hit team on a motorbike.

    A huge explosion at a top secret missile base in the Iranian desert appears to have killed the lead scientist on missile development.

    Mr Kucinich said he is worried these events mean the region is sliding towards greater conflict.

    “The events have been confirmed, so when you start to connect the dots, those dots start to spell the word war,” he said.

    The US has justified the use of drones in Afghan airspace as necessary to keep watch over American forces, but CIA involvement seems to confirm their use to gather intelligence beyond the border with Iran.

    The Sentinel drone, thought to be 65ft in wingspan, is one of the world’s most secret aircraft. Packed with surveillance electronics, it is capable of staying in the air for days.

  • The State Dept., Islam, and Freedom of Religion

    The State Dept., Islam, and Freedom of Religion

    Written by James Heiser

    hillaryclintonstate tIn a few days, the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) will meet in Washington with the express intention of building “muscles of respect and empathy and tolerance.” The invitation to meet in Washington was extended in July, when Secretary of State Hillary Clinton addressed the OIC during its meeting in Istanbul, Turkey. However, despite the trappings of talk about tolerance, implementation of the OIC’s agenda would restrict the free speech around the globe.According to its website the OIC perceives itself to be the voice of the Muslim world:

    The Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) (formerly Organization of the Islamic Conference) is the second largest inter-governmental organization after the United Nations which has membership of 57 states spread over four continents. The Organization is the collective voice of the Muslim world and ensuring to safeguard and protect the interests of the Muslim world in the spirit of promoting international peace and harmony among various people of the world.

    The OIC is also quick to link its own structure to the dreams of those who would see the whole of Islam — the Ummah — gathered as a political force, as it once was under the caliphate: “The Organization has the singular honor to galvanize the Ummah into a unified body and have actively represented the Muslims by espousing all causes close to the hearts of over 1.5 billion Muslims of the world.”

    When Clinton was speaking to the OIC “High-Level Meeting on Combating Religious Intolerance” last July, she reminisced about the days when her husband was president, and catered to the universalistic notion of the equivalence of all religions:

    In our conversation 15 years ago, I remember the secretary general talking about the imperative for us to move beyond these differences and how much the three great monotheistic religions have in common, especially our respective commandments to love our neighbors and to seek peace and understanding. Well, today, this wisdom that is ageless is as important as ever.

    And, lest anyone imagine that the liberties enjoyed in the West were more advanced than those enjoyed in the Islamic world, Clinton pandered to her audience, “And in established democracies, we are still working to protect fully our religious diversity, prevent discrimination, and protect freedom of expression.”

    But what does the OIC desire when it comes to preventing ‘discrimination’? The fundamental abridgment of the free speech guaranteed under the first amendment of the U.S. Constitution. As Nina Shea and Paul Marshall recently wrote for the Wall Street Journal:

    For more than 20 years, the OIC has pressed Western governments to restrict speech about Islam. Its charter commits it “to combat defamation of Islam,” and its current action plan calls for “deterrent punishments” by all states to counter purported Islamophobia.
    In 2009, the “International Islamic Fiqh [Jurisprudence] Academy,” an official OIC organ, issued fatwas calling for free speech bans, including “international legislation” aimed at protecting “the interests and values of [Islamic] society,” and for judicial punishment for public expression of apostasy from Islam. OIC Secretary General Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu emphasizes that “no one has the right to insult another for their beliefs.”
    The OIC does not define what speech should be outlawed, but its leading member states’ practices are illustrative. Millions of Baha’is and Ahmadis, religious movements arising after Muhammad, are condemned as de facto “insulters” of Islam, frequently persecuted by OIC governments, and attacked by vigilantes. Those seeking to leave Islam face similar fates.

    The Obama administration has already undermined the constitutionally guaranteed right of freedom of religion by speaking of a far narrower, “freedom of worship”— while religion influences every area of life, a “freedom of worship” is much more narrow, and could be restricted to activities specifically designated as worship-related. According to Shea and Marshall, many nations of the European Union are already succumbing to OIC pressure to restrict the free exercise of speech regarding the terrors of Islam:

    OIC pressure on European countries to ban “negative stereotyping of Islam” has increased since the 2004 murder of Theo Van Gogh for his film “Submission” and the Danish Muhammad cartoon imbroglio of 2005. Many countries (such as France, Germany, Austria, the Netherlands, Finland, Italy and Sweden), hoping to ensure social peace, now prosecute people for “vilifying” Islam or insulting Muslims’ religious feelings.
    Encouraging a more civil discourse is commendable, and First Amendment freedoms mean the U.S. won’t veer down Europe’s path anytime soon. But if the Obama administration is committed to defending constitutional rights, why is it, as the OIC’s Mr. Ihsanoglu wrote in the Turkish Weekly after the Istanbul meeting, standing “united” on speech issues with an organization trying to undercut our freedoms? Mr. Ihsanoglu celebrates this partnership even while lamenting in his op-ed that America permits “Islamophobia” under “the banner of freedom of expression.”

    Despite such constitutional guarantees, any capitulation to the agenda of the OIC could have a chilling effect on the exercise of religious liberty. And the fondness which the Clinton State Department has shown for Islamist political parties only heightens the fundamental tension between catering to the OIC’s intention to empower the “Ummah” and the responsibilities of every element of the federal government to uphold the Constitution.

    As reported for The New American in early November, the Obama administration has alligned itself with Islamist parties in the aftermath of the “Arab Spring” which toppled several less-overtly religious dictatorships and replaced them with ideologues bent on imposing more stringent interpretations of sharia law on their subjects. Thus, for example, a November 8 article for the Associated Press noted that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton “welcomed the Islamist party Ennahda’s strong showing in ‘an open, competitive election’ in Tunisia.” The results of Egypt’s first round of parliamentary elections have left Clinton somewhat less impressed; a December 6 AP article quotes a more sober assessment of the state of affairs in Egypt: “Transitions require fair and inclusive elections, but they also demand the embrace of democratic norms and rules. We expect all democratic actors to uphold universal human rights, including women’s rights, to allow free religious practice.” In short, it appears that democracy is not quite so appealing when it fails to deliver the anticipated results. The results of democracy in the aftermath of the “Arab Spring” may be pleasing to the OIC, but for those who have to live under the rule of Islamist parties that would punish blasphemy and apostasy from Islam, democracy has most certainly not brought liberty.

  • Materials likely destined for Iran nuclear program seized (video)

    Materials likely destined for Iran nuclear program seized (video)

    Turkey is determined to prevent Iran from possessing a nuclear weapon, Namik Tan, Turkey’s ambassador to the US, said Thursday. It intercepted materials Iran might have used to advance its nuclear program, he says.

    By Howard LaFranchi, Staff writer / December 8, 2011

    1208 monitor breakfast turkey Namik Tan full 380

    Turkish Ambassador to the US Namik Tan spoke to reporters at a Monitor-hosted breakfast on Thursday in Washington, D.C.

    Michael Bonfigli /The Christian Science Monitor

    Turkey has intercepted materials destined for Iran that could have been used to advance Tehran’s nuclear program, Turkey’s ambassador to Washington said Thursday.

    The Turkish official, Namik Tan, said Turkey, as Iran’s neighbor, is perhaps more determined than other more distant countries to keep Iran from possessing a nuclear weapon, and he suggested that Turkish-Iranian relations are deteriorating over the nuclear issue.

    “Some other countries have tried to transfer certain goods which would help Iran’s nuclear program, and we have stopped them,” Ambassador Tan said at a Monitor breakfast gathering of reporters.

    Tan refused to divulge any other information about the interception, including what the materials were, when it happened, and the country of origin, but he insisted that Turkey would never accept the existence of a nuclear bomb next door in Iran. Alluding to one line of thinking in Washington – that the international community will ultimately fail to stop Tehran’s progress and so the real objective becomes containing a nuclear Iran – Tan said Turkey would never resign itself to an Iranian bomb.

    “Even if you come to terms with a nuclear Iran, we will be against it,” he said.

    Turkish officials this year have acknowledged intercepting Iranian planes and trucks suspected of transporting arms to Syria, but US officials have repeatedly expressed concerns about Turkey serving as a conduit for Iran to procure equipment for its nuclar program – especially with bilateral trade soaring.

    Ankara’s representative to Washington also confirmed that the Turkish government is seeking military equipment including drones from Washington, as part of an effort to enhance its border defenses.

    Turkey’s robust trade relations with Iran have been hurt recently by actions on the Iranian side, Tan suggested. That comment comes amid a boom in Turkish-Iranian trade, but also in the aftermath of recent warnings out of Tehran that did not go down well in Ankara.

    Tehran recently warned Turkey that bilateral trade will suffer if Turkey does not alter a number of its policies, including what Iran sees as Turkish obedience to US demands. Trade between the two nations, at $10 billion in 2010, is estimated to reach $30 billion by 2016 absent any setback in relations.

    via Turkey: Materials likely destined for Iran nuclear program seized (video) – CSMonitor.com.