Category: America

  • White supremacist kills man

    White supremacist kills man

    mAn elderly white supremacist with a history of anti-Semitic tirades opened fire inside the Holocaust Memorial Museum, fatally wounding a security guard before being shot himself.

    Tourists scattered in panic, ducked and took cover as the shots rang out in the museum’s crowded entrance shortly after noon in the heart of the US capital, not far from the White House.

    The attack drew reactions of shock and sadness from President Barack Obama and other US leaders, Israel, and a US Muslim organization.

    The gunman was identified as James von Brunn, 88, a Maryland resident who has done time in prison for taking a gun into the US Federal Reserve in an apparently botched anti-Semitic attack, a federal law enforcement official told AFP.

    “It appears to be a lone gunman who entered into the museum and opened fire with what appears to be a rifle at this point,” Police Chief Cathy Lanier said.

    Security guard Stephen Tyrone Johns, 39, of nearby Maryland state, was pronounced dead after being rushed to a nearby hospital, police said. The gunman was in critical condition, Washington Mayor Adrian Fenty added.

    Obama — who last week became the first US president to visit the Nazi death camp in Buchenwald, Germany — expressed dismay, saying the incident underscored the need to counter prejudice.

    “I am shocked and saddened by today’s shooting at the US Holocaust Memorial Museum. This outrageous act reminds us that we must remain vigilant against anti-Semitism and prejudice in all its forms,” he said in a statement.

    The Holocaust-denying Von Brunn has written books on Adolf Hitler and his views on white superiority, including “Kill the Best Gentiles,” which his website calls “the culmination of his life’s work.”

    In a recent posting on his blog, he railed that “America is a Third-World racial garbage-dump — stupid, ignorant, dead-broke, and terminal.”

    Police and the Federal Bureau of Investigation said they had no warning of the attack, which erupted at 12:50 pm just inside the packed museum, which is often visited by school groups.

    The FBI said it had sent a special response squad to support the police, but it had no information “to indicate threats to area landmarks.”

    “An armed gunman came into the entrance and immediately opened fire striking one security guard. There was fire, gunfire returned. The gunman was hit,” Fenty said.

    Former defense secretary William Cohen said he was standing outside with a museum official when the gunman entered, apparently from a red vehicle left parked in the street.

    “When the shots rang out, we just ducked down and scattered,” Cohen said. “So we ran up the stairs. We didn’t know how many shooters were there, how many shots were going to continue, how many people were involved.”

    Cohen had been at the museum because a play written by his wife Janet Langhart Cohen was to be staged there Wednesday evening.

    Angela Andelson, 22, visiting from San Francisco, was walking toward the museum’s exit when she heard a loud bang “like someone had dropped something.”

    Then she saw a “gunman coming in (carrying) a long looking kind of gun.

    “I just ran in to one of the exhibits to try to take cover,” she said.

    “People were screaming and ducking down, getting on the floor, getting under benches.”

    Another witness, Maria Hernandez, was with her grandparents walking through the haunting exhibits which chronicle the Holocaust and the genocide of six million Jews under the Nazis.

    “We were in the exhibit ‘Remember the Children’ and we heard rounds fired and through the glass doors I saw a security guard firing towards the shooter and a man on his belly on the floor and when I looked back again, we were heading toward the exit, I saw blood all over the floor,” she told AFP.

    Israel said through its embassy that it was “shocked and saddened by today’s shooting incident.”

    The Muslim Public Affairs Council swiftly condemned what it called a “hate-motivated shooting.”

    “Tragic incidents like this one only strengthen our commitment to combatting intolerance in all forms through education and dialogue,” MPAC executive director Salam Al-Marayati said.

    Analysts noted the attack took place just five days after Obama became the first US president to visit the Nazi death camp in Buchenwald, Germany, where he renewed a historic commitment to Israel.

    Obama said Buchenwald was “the ultimate rebuke” to those “who insist that the Holocaust never happened, a denial of fact and truth that is baseless and ignorant and hateful.”

    “It’s hard to ignore the timing of this incident,” Brian Levin, a professor from the Center for the Study of Hate and Extremism at California State University, San Bernardino, told AFP.

    “Maybe he (von Brunn) feels his country is slipping away. So he sees a black president at Buchenwald, remembering the Holocaust, and decides to attack the biggest symbol of the Holocaust in the United States.”

    Mark Potok, director of the Alabama-based Southern Poverty Law Center, said the shooting followed a string of violent incidents by extremists in recent months that included the killing of three police officers in Pittsburgh in April and the murder of an abortion doctor in Kansas last month.

    “It’s really been quite an extraordinary period,” Potok told CNN, saying that there had been a “definite” surge in hate violence since Obama’s election.

    More than 30 million people have visited the museum since it opened in 1993, including 85 heads of state.

    AFP

  • Diplomacy, Inc.

    Diplomacy, Inc.

    The Power of Lobbies

    The Influence of Lobbies on U.S. Foreign Policy

    John Newhouse

    Summary —

    Lobbies representing foreign interests have an increasingly powerful — and often harmful — impact on how the United States formulates its foreign policy, and ultimately hurt U.S. credibility around the world.

    JOHN NEWHOUSE is a Senior Fellow at the World Security Institute and the author of a forthcoming book on foreign lobbies in the United States to be published by Simon & Schuster.

    The area around K Street in Washington, D.C., abounds with lobbyists, many of whom represent foreign governments or entities. Although some major foreign governments continue to work mainly through their embassies in Washington, nearly one hundred countries rely on lobbyists to protect and promote their interests. The subculture of public relations and law firms that do this kind of work reflects a steady decline and privatization of diplomacy — with an increasing impact on how the United States conducts its own foreign policy.

    The strongest lobbies promoting foreign interests are driven by cohesive ethnic population groups in the United States, such as Armenia, China, Greece, India, Israel, Taiwan, Ukraine, and, historically, Ireland. Even countries that have strong bilateral relations with the United States, such as Australia, Japan, and Norway, need lobbyists as well as embassies. Lobbyists can operate within the system in ways that experienced diplomats cannot. A lobbying group can identify with a domestic ethnic bloc even though it is paid by a foreign government. Ethnic politics can trump corporate interests and, more important, influence what agencies within the U.S. government may see as the national interest.

    The United States is a nation of immigrants — a strength that has also created vulnerabilities. Although ethnic population groups have at times offset isolationist tendencies in the United States, they also can find themselves conflicted on issues that could divide the motherland from the adopted country, the United States. In other cases, these so-called hyphenated groups unhesitatingly side with the United States and, in effect, become more royalist than the king.

    Source:  www.foreignaffairs.com, May/June 2009

  • Kemal Dervis to Address

    Kemal Dervis to Address

    TASSA-TOBB-WITSA Joint Symposium on “Science for Industry… Industry for Peace” Friday, June 12, 2009 5:00-9:00pm, World Bank, Washington DC

    This is to invite you to join us at the first TASSA-TOBB-WITSA Joint Symposium on Friday June 12, 2009 at 5:00-9:00pm at the Eugene R. Black Auditorium (H), The World Bank, 600, 19th St. NW, Washington, DC. The theme of the symposium is “Science for Industry… Industry for Peace”

    Kemal Derviş, Vice President and Director of Global Economy and Development and Edward M. Bernstein Scholar at Brookings Institution will give the Keynote Lecture. For further information, please see the attached flyer or visit www.tassausa.org

    For catering purposes, please RSVP at [email protected] or 215 895 0572.

    It will be our pleasure to welcome you at the first TASSA-TOBB-WITSA Joint Symposium. Kindly forward this notice to others who may be interested to attend.

    Sibel Kulaksız, WITSA Chair
    World Bank – IMF Turkish Staff Association

    Banu Onaral, TASSA President
    Turkish American Scientists and Scholars Association [www.tassausa.org]

    Düden Yeğenoğlu, TOBB US Representative
    Turkish Union of Chambers and Commodity Exchange [www.tobb.org.tr]

  • Emergence of a New Middle East Alliance

    Emergence of a New Middle East Alliance

    Patrick Seale

    usWhile U.S. President Barack Obama makes history in Cairo this week, a new regional grouping is taking shape in the northern part of the Middle East which could turn out to be equally significant.

    Turkey, Iran, Iraq and Syria are developing trade, energy and security ties which signal a common will to shape their national destinies free from external – and especially Western — dictation. What are the factors driving this new grouping? They are numerous, and mostly specific to each country.

    Turkey – having faced disagreements and disappointments with the U.S. (over the Iraq war), with the European Union (over the slow pace of accession negotiations) and with Israel (over the Palestine question) — has developed an ambitious regional policy towards its Arab and Islamic neighbours.

    Turkey’s trade with Iran, which was a mere $1bn in 2000 rose to $10bn in 2008, and is projected to double to $20bn in the not too distant future. Turkey is planning to invest $12bn in Iran’s South Pars gas field – a policy strikingly at variance with the call by Israel and its American friends for additional sanctions against Iran. Some one million Iranian tourists visit Turkey each year, and millions more visit Iraq, especially Kerbala, the place where Hussein, grandson of the Prophet Muhammad was martyred in 680. His tomb is the Shi‘is holiest shrine.

    Syria’s strategic partnership with Iran is now 30 years old, and shows no sign of waning. The Tehran-Damascus-Hizballah axis is a geopolitical fact of life in the region and was widely seen, during in the Bush years, as the main obstacle to U.S.-Israeli hegemony. In contrast to his predecessor, Obama is now seeking to reach out to both Iran and Syria, but he is apparently not yet ready to recognise that Hizballah is an unavoidable actor on the Lebanese scene. If Obama’s ambitious Middle East peace plans are to be realised, a U.S. dialogue with both Hizballah and Hamas cannot be long delayed.

    Syria’s relations with Turkey – strained almost to the point of war in 1998 over Syria’s backing of the Kurdish PKK leader, Abdallah Ocalan — have improved dramatically. Two-way trade is flourishing. A straw in the wind was the recent Turkish decision to increase the flow of Euphrates water to Syria’s north-east, which has been badly hit by drought.

    Syrian-Iraqi relations, marked by extreme hostility during Saddam Hussein’s rule, have also greatly improved. Last April, Syria’s Prime Minister Muhammad Naji Otri signed a wide-ranging agreement in Baghdad establishing a free trade zone and providing for cooperation in energy and education. Syria is to participate in the rehabilitation of the Kirkuk to Banias oil pipeline which passes through Syrian territory. Syria’s port at Latakia is to be expanded and road links to Iraq improved, to provide transit facilities for Iraq’s import- export trade. A train carrying 800 tons of steel left the Syrian port of Tartous on 30 May for Baghdad, the first rail freight trip between the two countries in decades.

    Iran, Turkey, and Syria all have a stake in Iraq’s future. Iran would clearly like Iraq to be a friendly neighbour under continued Shi‘i leadership. It wants Iraq to revive, but never again to be so powerful as to pose a threat as deadly as Saddam Hussein’s. Memories of the 1980-88 Iran-Iraq war are still too recent. Iran would probably prefer Iraq to develop into a federal state, and therefore relatively weak, rather than a strong unitary state. There are, however, no illusions in Tehran that Iraq, a major Arab country with a strong nationalist tradition, will ever consent to be an Iranian puppet.

    Whoever wins the Iranian presidential elections on 12 June – whether it is the conservative incumbent Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, or his principal challenger, former premier Mir-Hussein Mousavi, a ‘moderate’ conservative backed by the main reformist parties – the main lines of Iran’s external policy are unlikely to change: close ties with Syria, Iraq and Turkey; opposition to Sunni extremism in Afghanistan and Pakistan; support for Hizballah and the Palestinians; and continued uranium enrichment.

    What sort of Iraq, its neighbours wonder, will emerge from the slaughter, destruction and chaos of the past six years? Can a new regional balance be reached now that Iraq is again able to assert its national interests?

    It seems clear that Iraq has turned a corner. Violent deaths in May, at about 165, were among the lowest for any month since the U.S.-led invasion of 2003. Security is gradually returning, although still marred by horrendous suicide bombings. The Iraqi security forces – army, police, and intelligence — are steadily improving in size and efficiency. The recent conclusion of a Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) with the United States — with firm deadlines for the withdrawal of American armed forces — was an important expression of Iraqi sovereignty regained.

    But much remains to be done. Sunni-Shi‘i relations in Iraq remain tense, while Arab-Kurdish relations remain problematic; a hydrocarbons law has not yet been passed by parliament (although the central government has thought it best to turn a blind eye to the start of oil exports from the Kurdish region to Turkey.)

    War of Necessity, War of Choice, a recent book by Richard Haas contrasts the 1990 war to free Kuwait with the 2003 war to overthrow Saddam Hussein. The first, he argues was a war of necessity, the second a war of choice — and a very bad choice at that. It had a catastrophic impact on America’s armed forces, on its finances and its reputation. The Iraq war killed hundreds of thousands of Iraqis, displaced millions, shattered the country’s infrastructure, released sectarian demons, and upset the regional balance to Iran’s great benefit.

    Haas, a former senior American official, is now head of the prestigious New York–based Council on Foreign Relations. His book makes clear that Saddam’s alleged possession of Weapons of Mass Destruction was not the real motive for war. Pressure to attack Iraq came essentially from the civilian leadership at the Pentagon – especially from the then deputy defence secretary Paul Wolfowitz – and from other neo-cons in Vice-President Dick Cheney’s office, whose geopolitical fantasy was to overthrow the main Arab regimes, as well as the mullahs in Iran, and restructure the entire area, so as to make it safe for Israel.

    The neo-cons’ opportunity came because of America’s perceived need, after the 9/11 terrorist attacks, to send a big message to the Arab world about U.S. military power. Haas’ book is likely to revive the debate about the role of Israel’s friends in Washington in pushing the U.S. into war in Iraq. It will provide Barack Obama with ammunition to resist Israeli pressure to attack Iran.

    The grouping of Turkey, Iran, Iraq and Syria may not yet be a full-fledged alliance, but numerous common interests are pulling the four states in that direction. Not least is a concern about possible Israeli aggression – directed against Iran and Syria – and of continued uncertainty about the future course of American policy.

    Source:  www.daralhayat.com, 06 June 2009

  • Obama, Sarkozy disagree Turkey’s entry to EU

    Obama, Sarkozy disagree Turkey’s entry to EU

    AP foreign

    CAEN, France (AP) – €” President Barack Obama and French President Nicolas Sarkozy don’t see eye to eye on whether Turkey should be allowed to join the European Union.

    Obama supports EU membership for the largely Muslim country. Sarkozy (sahr-koh-ZEE’) opposes it.

    Obama says Turkey is an important NATO ally is helping with the war in Afghanistan. He says Turkey’s economy is growing and that the country wants closer relations with Europe — something Obama says he encourages.

    Sarkozy says he supports Turkey’s integration into Europe, but that he and Obama disagree on how to achieve it.

    The two leaders spoke at a news conference Saturday before D-Day celebrations in Normandy, France.

    Source: www.guardian.co.uk, June 7 2009

  • Press Release : Federation Of Canadian Turkish Association

    Press Release : Federation Of Canadian Turkish Association

    Press Release
    CBC Radio-1 Interview with Peter Balakian
    May 30, 2009
    Dear CBC Ombudsman,
    The following interview of Ann Maria Tremonti on behalf of GBC Radio-1 with Peter Balakian on alleged
    “Armenian Genocide” ) is way beyond the
    boundaries of a fair, neutral and reasonable fact finding reporting practice.
    What the interviewer is doing here seems to be an extraordinary effort to making sure that every aspect of the
    well known typical Armenian propaganda can be heard one more time by Canadian public through CBC. This
    effort, with directing questions and reminding of the propaganda elements forgotten even by the interviewee
    himself, can not be without any collaborative intentions. This is not an acceptable attitude for a public
    institution which is established and maintained by tax payers’ money like myself.
    First of all, regardless of who is right in this scholarly long disputed 1915 events, it is okay to let anybody to
    express his/her side of the story, but without any contributing/supportive efforts, as long as other side of the
    story also is being heard fairly. Unfortunately, by not following this established public media ethics rule and
    integrity code, your interviewer Ann Maria and CBC has breached the public trust that has been granted. As
    the representative of Turkish Canadian tax payers, we, the Federation of Canadian Turkish Associations
    condemn this intentional wrongdoing, and demand an explanation from CBC management. We are also
    demanding an apology from Turkish Canadians with the assurance that it will never happen again.
    CBC, or any fair media for that matter, have to provide all involved parties of such disputed issues with equal
    opportunities, including the Turkish side in this particular case. We are aware that CBC has consistently failed
    to follow this simple fairness rule so far, and it is hard to believe this is just a coincidence.
    All these worldwide orchestrated Armenian allegations that have been spread by their propaganda machine
    tirelessly for decades are politically motivated with land and retribution demands (which are not a secret
    anymore) for the following reasons, rather than seeking the truth and justice :
    · Armenia has refused to sign a border agreement with her neighbor Turkey as of today.
    · All Armenian educational materials show east of Turkey as south part of Armenia.
    · Armenians at any level never have acknowledged atrocities committed by Armenian bands to Turks,
    Azeri Turks, Kurds, Jewish and other Muslims of Anatolia and Caucasus during the same period, in
    corporation with the great powers of time under Russian, Franch and British uniforms.
    · Armenia today keeps 25% of Azerbaijan since 1992, and despite many UN resolutions to return the
    occupied land and let a million Azeri refuges to get back their homes, Armenia refuses to comply.
    Turkey has imposed economic embargo to Armenia since then blocking its borders with Armenia.
    · In 1980s, Armenian terrorists have killed over 60 innocent people around the world including an
    RCMP officer and 40 Turkish diplomats, and as of today non of these killers have been condemned by
    Armenians at any level, including their churches. These killers have been protected, praised as
    freedom fighters, encouraged and rewarded by Armenian lobbies, civic organizations and political
    parties of Armenian state.
    · Turkey has long opened Ottoman achieves for a fair review of the events by neutral historians/scholars
    and promised to comply with its outcomes no matter what, and demanded all parties involved to do
    same. Neither Armenians nor her former (and currently same) allies France and Russia have agreed
    with the process yet!!! Armenia indicated would cooperate if and only if its genocide allegation is
    accepted first, without any dispute. This is not surprise considering that Brian Ardouny of the
    Armenian Assembly of America in a videotaped interview clearly clucked lately: “We don’t need to
    prove the genocide historically, because it has already been accepted politically.” Thanks to the
    support of opportunist politicians and fair (!) media such as CBC.
    KTDF-FCTA | [email protected]
    |
    PO Box: 45024, 5845 Yonge Street, Willowdale, Ontario, M2M 4K3, CANADA
    Press Release
    CBC Radio-1 Interview with Peter Balakian
    May 30, 2009
    Considering the fact that there is no legitimate/legal verdict by any genocide tribunals such as International
    Court of Justice or any other authorized UN bodies for the 1915 events yet, and Armenians have never
    attempted to seek the arbitration of these institutions in resolving the issue (never mention about their denial of
    revealing own archives to world scholars); helping these Armenian lobbies in their effort in building political
    allies at Western parliaments such as Canada and US by passing motions in favor, unfairly influencing the
    public opinion via supposedly neutral media such as CBC, aiming at finally to dictating their one-sided
    allegations on Turks, will not contribute World peace and harmony at all. To the contrary, it will push Turkey
    to take stronger defensive position against this efforts, due to a loss of trust in West’s justice and fairness.
    As a Canadian tax payer of Turkish decent, I don’t believe that this is the result, we, democratic nations like
    Canada, desire to reach. Especially in such times when all the World (including Canada) has been fighting a
    war against global terrorism and its adverse consequences (economical/social chaos), it is unlikely that we can
    prevail without our NATO ally Turkey’s support, which is sitting in the middle of world energy resources and
    the largest energy distribution hub of the middle east, Caspian Sea, Near Asia and Caucasus, with the second
    largest army of NATO after US. Therefore, on behalf of the Turkish Canadians, the Federation of Canadian
    Turkish Assassinations is strongly against the encouragement of these Armenian lobbies to be less cooperative
    in finding truth and more aggressive/abusive in misusing foreign politics by our wrong policies; and we
    condemn any irresponsible acts of trusted public entities such as CBC in this regard.
    We hope that CBC leadership is capable of anticipating all these facts as what they are and make sure that in
    the future all its employees will act responsibly in dealing with such sensitive issues, according to the
    requirements of these aforementioned realities, avoiding to take supportive positions for one side or another in
    disputed matters. We all need to help retain Canada’s well known reputation of fairness/neutrality instead.
    From Turkish perspective of the issue, I would like to bring to your attention, the elaboration of a March 23,
    1920, letter of Col. Charles Furlong, an Army intelligence officer and U.S. Delegate to the Paris Peace
    Conference: “We hear much, both truth and gross exaggeration of Turkish massacres of Armenians, but little
    or nothing of the Armenian massacres of Turks. … The recent so-called Marash massacres [of Armenians]
    have not been substantiated. In fact, in the minds of many who are familiar with the situation, there is a grave
    question whether it was not the Turk who suffered at the hands of the Armenian and French armed contingents
    which were known to be occupying that city and vicinity. … Our opportunity to gain the esteem and respect of
    the Muslim world … will depend much on whether America hears Turkey’s untrammeled voice and evidence
    which she has never succeeded in placing before the Court of Nations.”
    Nothing seems to have changed from those days, when Christian lives were more precious than the lives of the
    “others”, Turks and Muslims. If you are interested in learning more of the Turkish side of the story from the
    neutral sources, please find attached the opinions of a list of non-Turkish scholars and the entities, which do
    not agree with the Armenian allegations.
    Until this dispute is resolved justly on the legitimate International platforms and a scholarly agreement is
    established between two nations (Armenians and Turks), the third parties (governments and media such as
    CBC) should only encourage them to openly discuss the matter and mediate if needed by only giving equal
    chances for both side, rather than filtering one’s voice and supporting the other all the time.
    Sincerely.
    Dr. Mehmet Bor
    A. President of Canadian Turkish Associations.
    Tel: +1-647-230 9397
    www.canturk.net, [email protected]
    KTDF-FCTA | [email protected]
    |
    PO Box: 45024, 5845 Yonge Street, Willowdale, Ontario, M2M 4K3, CANADA