Category: America

  • Some lawmakers have second thoughts about Turkey trips

    Some lawmakers have second thoughts about Turkey trips

    By Laylan Copelin and Mike Ward
    AMERICAN-STATESMAN STAFF

    For Texas legislators, one of the most coveted activities in recent years has been 10-day trips to Turkey, paid for in full or in part by various Turkish American organizations.

    A dozen or so state officials, including several Central Texas legislators, have taken the trips in the past several years, and more have been invited this year.

    Sen. Troy Fraser, R-Horseshoe Bay, said he has taken many fact-finding trips, including to almost every country in Europe, but Turkey stands out.

    He said last fall’s trip to Turkey was “the best I’ve taken” because of the high level of government officials and business leaders he was able to meet.

    “They are trying to improve relations,” Fraser said. “It was a trade mission.”

    The Turquoise Council of Americans and Eurasians, an umbrella group for Turkish Americans, said the trips are about good will, not lobbying.

    “These trips serve to further the business, commercial and cultural relations between Texas and Turkey,” said Kemal Oksuz, the council’s president-elect.

    However, some legislators say they’re having second thoughts about going this year, in part because of a recent New York Times article that suggested connections between the Harmony Schools, which operate 33 charter schools in Texas, and several Turkish American businesses and organizations, including the Houston-based Turquoise Council.

    The Times questioned whether those connections favor Turkish American companies in bids to build the schools or provide education services.

    Additionally, conservative bloggers have implied that the Harmony Schools promote Islam.

    Harmony officials deny that their schools teach religion, They also have said they have no connection to the Turquoise Council and its trips.

    Despite the denials, Rep. Sid Miller, R-Stephenville, said he believes there are connections between the Turquoise Council, the Harmony Schools and the promotion of Islam.

    “After I researched it, I’m not interested,” he said of the council’s invitation to visit Turkey.

    As for the Harmony Schools, Miller said, “Apparently it’s (involved in) indoctrination of Islam.”

    Although Turkey is a moderate Muslim nation, Miller said: “That just means they’re nonviolent. They won’t cut off your head.”

    Rep. Wayne Christian, R-Center, said, “It’s a tempting trip.” But he said he worried about “political overtones” because of reports about Muslim connections.

    “If it’s true — and I don’t know that it is — if they’re teaching Islam, that’s a problem,” said Christian, a supporter of charter schools.

    Rep. Senfronia Thompson, D-Houston, visited Turkey a few years ago to observe its education system, among other things.

    “I don’t remember that anyone talked about the Harmony Schools or anything that anyone in Turkey was doing in Texas,” she said. “They didn’t make a big deal out of religion. It really wasn’t brought up. They wanted people to understand their country.”

    Rep. Pete Gallego, D-Alpine, traveled to Turkey five years ago but said he hasn’t decided whether to return this year.

    “It was the single most educational trip I’ve taken,” he said. “You have in-depth conversations with the people there, the officials in government, in business, different groups, different ethnicities. You meet and talk with real people.”

    Rep. Ken Legler, R-Pasadena, said he is tempted to go because his district includes part of the Houston Ship Channel and he is interested in encouraging more Turkish trade through the port.

    But he said he hesitated to accept an offer for an all-expenses-paid trip for him and his wife.

    “It would look like a junket,” Legler said. “I’m just worried about how it looks.”

    Lawmakers who have taken the trips have reported their value at between $3,200 and $3,800.

    The itinerary includes visits with government and business leaders, journalists and everyday citizens, as well as sightseeing at tourist attractions and religious sites.

    There’s also time for fun, including a yacht trip on the Bosporus strait, a balloon flight and shopping in the city’s famous bazaars.

     

  • APA – American Turks and Azeris say no to US intervention in Turkey’s religious affairs

    APA – American Turks and Azeris say no to US intervention in Turkey’s religious affairs

    Washington. Isabel Levine – APA. American Turks and Azerbaijanis have started a new campaign to protect Turkey’s rights, APA’s Washington DC correspondent was told by Azerbaijani Diaspora.

    The US Senate Resolution introduced on May 24 for the U.S. Congress to demand Turkey to grant special international privileges to the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Istanbul, bypassing the Constitution and secular laws of that country.

    The resolution contradicts the founding principles and the Constitution of the US by seeking the federal government institution to interfere in sovereign religious affairs of a foreign country.

    Turkish, Azeri and Turkic-Americans oppose H. Res. 196 by sending the Pax Turcica Capwiz action letter to their elected representatives and local media.

    US Turks and Azeris call on all friends and supporters to join the campaign.

    via APA – American Turks and Azeris say no to US intervention in Turkey’s religious affairs.

  • Say NO to U.S. intervention in Turkey’s sovereign religious affairs

    Say NO to U.S. intervention in Turkey’s sovereign religious affairs

    Say NO to U.S. intervention in Turkey’s sovereign religious affairs

    Oppose H. Res. 180 and S. Res. 196

    The House Resolution 180 introduced on March 17, 2011 and the Senate Resolution 196 introduced on May 24, 2011 call for the U.S. Congress to demand Turkey to grant special international privileges to the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Istanbul, bypassing the Constitution and secular laws of that country. Both resolutions also contradict the founding principles and the Constitution of the United States by seeking the federal government institution to interfere in sovereign religious affairs of a foreign country.

    Join the Turkish- and Turkic-Americans to oppose H. Res. 180 and H. Res. 196 by sending the Pax Turcica Capwiz action letter to your elected representatives and local media.

    via paxturcica — Say NO to U.S. intervention in Turkey’s sovereign religious affairs.

  • Will Harper ever visit Turkey?

    Will Harper ever visit Turkey?

    By Peter O’Neil

    Postmedia News Europe Correspondent

    When Prime Minister Stephen Harper decided to visit Greece following the G8 summit last month in France the furrowed-eyebrow reaction from some analysts was: “What about Turkey?”

    Neighbouring Turkey, which Mr. Harper has never visited since taking office in 2006, has a booming economy, has more than seven times the population (78.8 million), and is an increasingly important western ally and regional power broker in the Middle East and North Africa.
    Neighbouring Turkey, which Mr. Harper has never visited since taking office in 2006, has a booming economy, has more than seven times the population (78.8 million), and is an increasingly important western ally and regional power broker in the Middle East and North Africa.

    Neighbouring Turkey, which Mr. Harper has never visited since taking office in 2006, has a booming economy, has more than seven times the population (78.8 million), and is an increasingly important western ally and regional power broker in the Middle East and North Africa.

    Greece, with just under 11 million people, is staggering under a debt so vast it is barely able to assert its own sovereignty, let alone exert regional influence. Its trade with Canada is tiny and shrinking.

    “We should be paying closer attention to Turkey, which is the Mediterranean’s economic tiger and the region’s only Muslim democracy,” said Fen Hampson, director of Carleton University’s Norman Paterson School of International Affairs.

    “Turkey has a key stabilizing role to play in the Middle East and North African region. Its GDP is fast approaching the $1 trillion mark.”

    There are also business interests who would like to see Canada’s rapidly growing trade relationship with Turkey flourish even more, particularly those seeking major government contracts, said Gar Knutson, an Ottawa lobbyist and former Liberal MP who sits on the board of the Canadian-Turkish Business Council.

    “I think the prime minister at some point should go to Turkey. They’re an important NATO ally; it’s a quickly growing economy. We have lots of interests there,” Mr. Knutson said.

    Mr. Harper’s aides have told the media that Canada has important historical and people-to-people ties with Greece, and there has been a long-standing invitation to Mr. Harper from Prime Minister George Papandreou.

    Politics is another factor, since the Conservatives have long wooed the large Greek diaspora in Canada.

    But Turkey, say Mr. Harper’s aides, is one of the countries the prime minister wants to visit.

    “We did our best in a minority government situation to travel to as many countries as possible,” spokesman Andrew MacDougall said in an email this week.

    “Of course, we haven’t had the opportunity to visit all the countries we would like to visit, including Turkey. We look forward to doing so at some point in the future.”

    But the idea of a Harper visit to Turkey is fraught with domestic and foreign policy sensitivities due to decisions dating back to Mr. Harper’s time as official Opposition leader.

    During that period he embraced the politically active Armenian-Canadian community’s claim that atrocities committed against their community in Ottoman Turkey starting in 1915 constituted genocide.

    Plenty of politicians around the world have responded to the Armenian lobby effort, resulting in some 20 legislatures in various countries passing motions recognizing that genocide took place. Among them was the Canadian Senate, in 2002, and the House of Commons two years later.

    But, according to Turkey, Canada’s Conservative government is the only one in the world to officially embrace the genocide narrative as official government policy.

    Turkey objected furiously in 2006 when Mr. Harper formally stated the new policy, but some diplomats said a thaw had started to develop prior to the 2011 election campaign.

    In April of 2010, for instance, Mr. Harper issued no statement to the general public to mark the anniversary of the tragedy. And recent high-level visits include a 2009 trip to Turkey by Lawrence Cannon, then minister of foreign affairs, and another last year by Defence Minister Peter MacKay.

    Furthermore, Export Development Canada has just announced the opening of a regional office in Istanbul to help Canadian exporters break into the relatively thriving regional market, and there have been preliminary talks on possible free trade negotiations.

    But then Mr. Harper issued an election campaign statement on the genocide, almost identical to the 2006 declaration, that got almost no mainstream media coverage in Canada but deeply angered Turkey.

    Mr. Harper’s “wrong and unfair” judgment was based on “one-sided information” that came after a number of initiatives to improve relations, said an April 27 statement from the Turkish foreign ministry.

    The government’s position was also “based on narrow political calculations” and “dealt a blow to these efforts,” the statement declared.

    Rafet Akgunay, Turkey’s ambassador to Canada and a former senior foreign policy adviser to Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, said there has never been a discussion initiated by either government regarding a possible Harper visit.

    “I don’t want to comment on such assumptions. If he wants to visit Turkey I’m sure my authorities would consider it accordingly,” Mr. Akgunay told Postmedia News.

    But he described Mr. Harper’s genocide position as a “major obstacle” standing in the way of improved relations.

    While one senior Turkish foreign affairs official in Ankara told Postmedia News this week that Mr. Harper would be welcome, another former senior Turkish diplomat familiar with Canada said he doubted his country would agree to set out the welcome mat for a foreign leader who would likely inflame nationalist sentiment.

    Mr. Hampson said Mr. Harper should try to find a way to mend relations.

    “Turkey is far too important a country to shun or ignore or make hostage to our own domestic politics.”

    via Will Harper ever visit Turkey? | Posted | National Post.

  • U.S. Consul General Underlines Importance of General Elections in Turkey

    U.S. Consul General Underlines Importance of General Elections in Turkey

    The U.S. consul general in Istanbul said on Friday that June 12 parliamentary elections was an important step for stability and economic progress of Turkey.

    U.S. Consul General Scott Frederic Kilner, speaking at a meeting with Gokhan Sozer, Governor of northwestern province of Edirne, described the elections as interesting and important.

    Kilner also underlined importance of Edirne saying the city was the gate of Turkey opening to Europe.

    Commenting on June 12 general elections, Kilner said it was an important success for democracy.

    Kilner said Justice & Development (AK) Party won majority of votes, but on the other side Republican People’s Party (CHP) increased the number of its seats at the parliament. He said Nationalist Movement Party (MHP) would be in the parliament and representatives from east and southeast of Turkey would also be in the parliament.

    Friday, 17 June 2011

    A.A.

     

  • Arab Spring, Kurdish Summer

    Arab Spring, Kurdish Summer

    Siyonizmin Fifisiby Sebahat Tuncel

    TURKEY often presents itself to the world as a model Muslim democracy, but it is in fact denying basic democratic rights to almost 20 percent of its population. The Turkish prime minister, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, was re-elected on Sunday by a large margin, and he now faces a major domestic challenge. Despite Turkey’s impressive economic growth and increasing international profile during Mr. Erdogan’s eight years in power, his government has ignored the country’s most important and politically explosive issue: Turkey’s oppressed Kurdish minority.

    Kurds have been struggling for freedom and autonomy in Turkey for decades — often in the face of violent state repression. We will no longer accept the status quo. We are demanding democratic freedoms, the right to speak our own language in schools and mosques and greater political autonomy in Kurdish-majority regions.

    Since Mr. Erdogan’s Justice and Development Party, known as the A.K.P., came to power in the 2002 elections, Turkey has deepened its diplomatic and economic ties with governments across the Middle East, and Mr. Erdogan’s public denunciations of Israel have made him a popular figure throughout the region. But while the prime minister frequently expresses his sorrow over the deaths of Palestinian children, he has not so much as mentioned the Kurdish children who have been killed by the army and the police in Turkey.

    Last week, as Syrian refugees fled across the border into Turkey, Mr. Erdogan condemned the Syrian government’s violent crackdown on protesters. He neglected to mention the Turkish government’s use of tear gas, bullets and water cannons to disperse Kurdish protesters in April. Until Mr. Erdogan gets his own house in order, he is in no position to criticize his neighbors.

    Indeed, it is impossible for pro-democracy movements in Egypt, Syria or Libya to trust the Turkish government when it neglects its own opposition, suppresses protests and denies the legitimate demands of the Kurdish people.

    Mr. Erdogan’s government can follow one of two paths. It can seriously consider these demands, include Kurdish lawmakers in the process of drafting Turkey’s new Constitution, provide constitutional guarantees for the collective rights of the Kurdish people and accept our demand for autonomy that will allow for self-government and bring peace. Or it can insist on the policy of violent suppression that it has pursued to date. If the second path is taken, Turkey could enter a more intense period of conflict than ever before.

    Unfortunately, Mr. Erdogan’s recent comment that he would have hanged Abdullah Ocalan, the imprisoned Kurdish nationalist leader, had he been in power when Mr. Ocalan was arrested in 1999 gives the impression that he is leaning toward the second path.

    It was not always so. In a 2005 speech in Diyarbakir, Mr. Erdogan declared, “The Kurdish problem is my problem.” It seemed that he had accepted the failure of Ankara’s heavy-handed security policy and was setting a new process in motion. This “Kurdish opening” seemed like a step in the right direction; it offered the possibility of greater language rights, more autonomy and amnesty for antigovernment Kurdish militants.

    However, it soon became clear that Mr. Erdogan was not sincere. Despite the Turkish public’s approval of the opening, the A.K.P. did not take serious steps toward resolving the Kurdish problem. On the contrary, it stepped up military operations, banned the leading Kurdish party, the D.T.P., and arrested Kurdish politicians, including me. (I was arrested in November 2006 and spent nine months behind bars, until I was elected to Parliament from prison and granted immunity in July 2007.)

    Since then the government has largely ignored the Kurdish people’s grievances. Under the guise of an opening, it has continued the traditional nationalist politics of denial. Rather than meeting the demands of the Kurdish people, it seems that the A.K.P. is now dragging Turkey toward a new confrontation. The election of 36 pro-Kurdish deputies to Parliament will be the most effective check on the A.K.P.’s destructive policy.

    As Turkey’s various political parties debate the drafting of a new Constitution, the resolution of the Kurdish issue will be of paramount importance — and this will require the active participation of Kurdish members of Parliament.

    The unjustified arrests and military operations must come to an end and Turkey’s Kurds, after decades of struggle, must be granted the right to learn and pray in our own language and exercise self-government in our cities and towns.

    Sebahat Tuncel is a Kurdish member of Turkey’s Parliament. This article was translated by Elif Kalaycioglu from the Turkish.

    www.nytimes.com, June 17, 2011