ISRAEL SUES CITIZENS FOR SLANDER AND APOLOGIES TO TURKEY
Privacy and Libel Law: The Clash with Press Freedom
BY SINEM TEZYAPAR
I am a Turkish Muslim and every time I have a conversation with an Israeli friend, they keep asking me why the relations between Israel and Turkey have reached such a nadir, why Turkey seemingly has an antagonistic stance against Israel.
First of all, Turkey’s being totally against Israel is out of question. Turkey and Israel are two countries who have deep-rooted, solid relations, and there will be no change in that. Although the language in the political arena may give a different impression, the bond between the Turkish and Israeli public remains unshaken. Yes, there has been a tension between Turkey and Israel for the last couple of years; however this is a temporary thing. And the Turkish public has never ceased to care for Israelis.
The Mavi Marmara episode was an unwanted incident and I do not believe that no one ever presumed that things would end the way they did. I am confident that if both sides had known the result ahead of time, they would have striven to handle things in an entirely different manner. The Israeli public has to decide how they want to compensate, but we consider Israel as a friendly country in any event and we want to overcome this regrettable incident in the soonest time.
Turkey and Israel share common features that deepens their alliance. Both states are officially secular while their people are predominantly religious. Since secularism is both a precaution and a blessing against hypocrisy, in both countries people who chose to be religious follow their free will and no one can compel anyone to any religion. That is to say, there is a firm stance against bigotry and in both countries people are respected and embraced regardless of their religion. And in both, just like believers can live by their faith, non-believers live as they choose as well.
Israel and Turkey being secular prevents coercion, compulsion in the name of religion, and does not give ground for hypocrisy. Their interpretation of secularism should not be confused with atheism; rather, it guarantees the freedom of the public to practice their religion as they see fit. In both Israel and Turkey, democratic awareness and democratic values are more firmly rooted than any other country in the region. There is no room or tolerance for dictatorship or despotic regimes.
Another commonality between the people of Turkey and Israel is that they do not have an overweening ambition to live a materialistic life in luxury. Both have known hardship and they have both been nurtured from their spirituality and conviction. They have been living under fire in a region that has never known stability and that has always been in the focus of the world with their conflicts.
As the Turkish nation, we want nothing more then the continuance of Israel’s existence in peace and tranquility. We are happy to see its being prosperous and all its citizens living in comfort and safety. As Turkish people, the settling of the Jews in the region, their residing in those lands and their being free is something that we are not uncomfortable about. On the contrary; when various public figures in the Middle East make threatening and, quite frankly, genocidal pronouncements against the Israeli state and its citizens, it disturbs us greatly and we would never let something like that happen.
Just like we came to the aid of our Jewish brothers and sisters and sailed them in private ships to Turkey in 1492 during the period of the Spanish Inquisition and welcomed them in our country, we will be ready to run to their help whenever they are in need. When Hitler targeted the Jews during the Nazis genocidal “Final Solution”, we struggled with all our might to protect them. We have lived in a friendly and brotherly manner together with our Jewish brothers. We have always provided good means for them, we have always wanted them to live in ease and comfort and that will always be the case as well. This is because such an attitude is the requisite of the morality that Islam requires. The Muslim Turks’ attitude for centuries has demonstrated that Turks and Jews have continued to help each other in times of great crises and it will continue to be this way, no matter what happens.
When we go a back a little further in history, this is even more evident that Jews and Muslims not only coexisted but also supported each other. After the Romans destroyed the Second Temple and took control of the city, they expelled Jews from the city forbidding them to live there. When Rome adopted Christianity, they maintained a strict ban on Jews coming near Jerusalem after 325 A.D. Jews were only allowed to enter once a year to pray on Tisha B’Av. The ban on Jews entering the city remained in force until the Muslim Caliph Umar took control of the city. Muslims then welcomed the Jews to come back to Jerusalem for the first time in about 600 years. During the Abbasid Caliphate, Muslims continued to welcome Jews to settle in the city and this situation continued until the city was invaded by the Crusaders in 1099. Another point to be emphasized is that Muslims and Jews fought side-by-side to defend the city against the invading Crusaders. After the Crusaders conquered Jerusalem, and put a good many of the inhabitants to the sword -both Jewish and Muslim alike- Jews were once again prohibited to enter Jerusalem. This prohibition continued till the Muslim leader Salah al-Din Yusuf ibn Ayyub, known better as Saladin, finally liberated the city in 1187 from the Crusaders and invited the Jews to return to Jerusalem with no restrictions and allowed them to take up residence.
The existence of Turkey is a safeguard for Israel. We will be the first ones to stand up for any kind of threat that might be aimed at Israel. There will never be a formation in Turkey that would aim to harm the Jewish people. Just as it could be in any society, there may be one or two rare extreme radical people and those individuals might come up with some unreasonable or irrational opinions. But radical thought can never find a broad foundation in Turkey. What matters is that we are not a state in search of hostility. From time to time, we might have problems, as is inevitable between sovereign nation-states, but there will never be a complete termination of our friendship.
We both want peace, friendship, democracy, human rights, goodness, compassion and love to be dominant in the region and we want to live a beautiful life together. Turkey and Israel working in unison can make the entire region faithful, prosperous and put an end to terror, radicalism and anarchy. Israel and Turkey will continue with their alliance as strong as steel and bring peace, love and tranquility to the region.
ISTANBUL (Morning Star News) – An Iranian-American pastor imprisoned for planting house churches in Iran years ago writes that he is undergoing torture, death threats, and pressure to renounce his faith from prison officials and inmates.
Saeed Abedini, 32, described his ordeal in a letter to family members that was released by his U.S.-based attorneys. In the letter, dated Feb. 18, he said that maltreatment in the notorious Evin Prison is such that his eyes “get blurry, my body does not have the strength to walk, and my steps become very weak and shaky.”
Prison conditions include “various (bullying) groups, the psychological warfare, a year of not seeing my family, physical violence, actions committed to humiliate me, insults, being mocked, being confronted with extremists in the prison who create another prison within the prison walls, and the death threats,” he wrote.
The Tehran prison is infamous for its maltreatment of political dissidents and government protestors. Activists and converts to Christianity serve time alongside murderers and rapists in one of the world’s most dangerous prisons.
Abedini wrote that prison officials have targeted him for abuse in pressuring him to renounce his faith.
“They are trying to put me under such horrific pressures … so that they can show me that my faith is empty and not real,” he wrote. “And after all of these pressures, after all of the nails they have pressed against my hands and feet, they are only waiting for one thing … for me to deny Christ. But they will never get this from me.”
Prison officials and Muslim extremists inside his cell have used various methods to “punish” Abedini for converting to Christianity. In one case, the leader of his cell attacked him when he was singing praise songs, said Tiffany Barrans, international legal director of the American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ).
“While the prison officials try to use his conviction and sentence as leverage, other prisoners use physical assaults,” she told Morning Star News.
Both parties believe that causing the pastor to recant his faith would be a religious and national victory. Muslim prisoners consider it their duty to return “lapsed” Muslims to their religion; officials consider it a matter of control.
“When Muslims leave the faith for Christianity, the government believes it loses its control over that citizen,” Barrans said. “Therefore, whether motivated by principles of Islam or control of the citizens in Iran, the Iranian government seeks to bring everyone under Islamic rule.”
Those close to the pastor said he suffers from infections from his injuries that have not been properly treated by prison medical staff. He is in a cell with 20-25 other prisoners, some of whom have subjected him to physical and psychological torture.
Abedini wrote that he responded to the cell group leader’s assault by hugging him; the assailant, he noted, was shocked.
“It is during these harsh conditions, that I deeply need God’s Saving Grace so that I can be the fragrant Scent of Christ in the dark house of Evin prison,” he wrote. “I have often seen the Shining Morning Star in the darkness of this prison and I have seen His amazing and supernatural works. Oh, how beautiful is seeing the light of the Shining Morning Star of Christ in such evil darkness.”
Calling for Release
Incarcerated since his arrest in September, Abedini was sentenced on Jan. 27 to eight years in prison for threatening “national security” by planting house churches.
He has traveled back and forth between the United States and Iran since becoming a U.S. citizen in 2010 after marrying his American wife.
In a previous arrest a decade ago, Iranian officials demanded that Abedini take part in no more church planting. Previously he had established churches in Iran but has maintained that he has not evangelized since receiving the warning. He says the nine trips to Iran he has made since 2009 were to visit family and friends, and the purpose of his most recent trip last year – when he was arrested – was to establish an orphanage.
His lawyer, Naser Sarbazi, a Muslim, appealed the verdict on Feb. 4 and is awaiting another hearing. This written submission is being reviewed by a panel of three Revolutionary Court judges, but no date has been set for the final decision.
Abedini is prohibited from speaking with his wife, Nagmeh Abedini, by phone. She reportedly said that Saeed’s harsh treatment has taken a tremendous physical toll on him and could take his life before his prison sentence is complete.
She and their two children, a 6-year-old daughter and 4-year-old son, reside in Idaho. He was ordained as a member of the American Evangelistic Association in 2008.
Since his arrest, Abedini’s family and legal representatives have worried that sentencing would bring brutal and life-threatening treatment in the prison. Their fears have been confirmed.
“This new letter from Pastor Saeed could not be more clear or direct – he continues to face life-threatening abuse simply because of his religious beliefs,” Jordan Sekulow, executive director of the ACLJ, which represents Abedini’s wife and children in the United States, said in a statement.
Advocacy groups have worked for months to secure his release. The ACLJ filed a document last week with the U.N. Human Rights Council to call on Iran for his release.
U.S. Government officials are also ratcheting up pressure on the Islamic republic to release Abedini. On Feb. 14, a bipartisan group of more than 80 members of Congress sent a letter to Secretary of State John Kerry to “exhaust every possible option to secure Mr. Abedini’s immediate release.”
“Religious freedom is one of the most fundamental rights any human being should have,” said U.S. Rep. Robert Alderhold (R-Ala.). “Pastor Abedini’s wrongful conviction and imprisonment is the latest example of Iran’s continued blatant disregard for religious freedom and the rule of law.”
###
© 2013 Morning Star News. Articles may be reprinted with credit to Morning Star News. https://morningstarnews.org/
Morning Star News is a 501(c)(3) non-profit corporation whose mission is to inform those in the free world and in countries violating religious freedom about Christians worldwide who are persecuted for their faith. For free subscription or to make tax-deductible donations, contact[email protected], or send check to Morning Star News, 24310 Moulton Parkway, Suite O # 157, Laguna Hills, CA 92637, USA.
By: Necdet Pamir for Al-Monitor. Posted on February 20.
|
The International Energy Agency’s Iraq Energy Outlook (2012) reports, “Alongside its announcement of 143 billion barrels of proven reserves, the Ministry of Oil stated in 2010 that Iraq’s undiscovered resources amounted to some 215 billion barrels.” While the former figure is equivalent to almost 9 percent of the world’s proven oil reserves, the latter is more than 13 percent of the total. Iraq also has significant natural gas reserves that constitute some 1.5% of the world’s total, making Iraq 13th among global reserve holders.
Summary : Turkey’s relationship with the Kurdistan Regional Government may be undermining its long-term economic and energy interests in Iraq, writes Necdet Pamir.
Author: Necdet Pamir |
For neighboring Turkey — which imports 93% of the oil it consumes and 98% of its gas — Iraq offers an excellent source of potentially cheaper energy and an opportunity to diversify its supply. Iraq’s favorable exploration, development and production costs as well as lower transportation expenses highlight its importance for Turkey, which paid $60.1 billion for its energy imports in 2012. That year, 12% of its oil imports came from Iraq, while 41% was imported from Iran.
The Turkish Petroleum Corporation (TPAO), the state-run oil and gas exploration and production company, began trying to win bids in Iraq in 1994. The company finally successed (with partners) in 2009, winning five successive bids, all of them located around Basra: the Siba gas field, Mansuriyah gas field, Badra oil field, Missan oil field and Block 9.
This modest success, capping a 15-year effort, now seems to be threatened by a Turkish government decision to apparently transport oil and gas produced in northern Iraq without the approval of the Iraqi federal government. Modest volumes were being transported using road tankers, but Ankara and the Kurdish Regional Government (KRG) then declared their intention in 2012 to jointly construct oil and gas pipelines to transport larger quantities. The volume for the oil pipeline was announced as starting at 200,000 barrels per day (bpd) with the expectation of an increase to 1 million bpd. If a gas pipeline is built, it would have a capacity of 10 billion cubic meters a day.
In the inevitable reaction, Iraqi Deputy Prime Minister Hussain al-Shahristani, in an interview with the BBC on Nov. 15, 2012, said, “If Turkey does not give up supporting pipelines to transport northern Iraq’s oil and gas directly through Turkey, then the Iraqi central government would not hesitate to block Turkish companies from investing or bidding in Iraq.” Shahristani further stated, “According to the bilateral agreement between the governments of Turkey and Iraq, Turkey should exclusively work with the Iraqi central government, which is the only authority to permit the exports according to the Iraqi constitution.”
Prime Minister Nouri al- Maliki accused Turkey of wanting more than oil, stating, “Turkey made a deal with Iraq’s Kurdish administration, and an agreement aimed to divide Iraq.” Maliki pointed to reports from politicians in the region as evidence that such a deal was in fact made.
How Iraqi oil and gas should be managed lies in articles 111 and 112 of the constitution. Article 111 states, “Oil and gas are owned by all the people of Iraq in all the regions and governates,” and article 112 defines the framework for management of oil and gas extraction from current fields as well as newly discovered ones. In both cases, authority is given to the central (federal) government, albeit along with the producing regions and governates. Article 112 further states that any related activity is to be regulated by law. (Of note, the Hydrocarbon Law is awaiting ratification by the Iraqi parliament.) Thus, the federal government considers the Turkish and KRG efforts a violation of the Iraqi constitution and a challenge to its sovereignity.
A list of other contentious issues have further complicated relations between Iraq and Turkey, including Ankara’s refusal to extradite Tariq al-Hashimi, the former Iraqi vice president who was charged with running death squads and sentenced to death in absentia in 2012. As a consequence of the prevailing tensions, in November 2012 the “Iraqi cabinet [had] expelled Turkey’s state-owned TPAO from the consortium that was granted the rights to explore Block 9, and has asked Kuwait Energy to take over the shareholding.” It seems fair to say that if the Turkish government continues with its current approach, it should come as no surprise if the other four bids are also voided or worse.
Iraqi Oil Minister Abdul Kareem Luaibi announced on Jan. 16 that Baghdad plans to sue Genel Energy, the first direct exporter of oil from northern Iraq, and perhaps cut government funding allocated for the region unless it ceases what he labeled as smuggling. Genel Energy is a joint Turkish-British private company following a recent reshuffle of its equity structure.
The possible consequences of Turkish policy could become a broader problem because of concerns in Washington. Francis Ricciardone, the US ambassador to Turkey, reflected on them when he said, “Turkey and Iraq have no choice but to pursue strong ties if they want to optimize the use of Iraq’s resources and export them via Turkey. If Turkey and Iraq fail to optimize their economic ties, the failure could be worse than that. There could be a more violent conflict in Iraq and [the chances of] disintegration of Iraq could be [strengthened].” During the last days of 2012, relations between the Baghdad government and Iraqi Kurds became so tense that they both reinforced military positions along their internal border.
Ricciardone’s words appear to have fallen on deaf ears, at least at the government level, but perhaps someone in Ankara has the capacity to discern the agenda evident in the words of Nechirvan Barzani, prime minister of the KRG, in an interview with Time magazine in December 2012. When asked, “Is it possible to say that you are closer than ever to an independent Kurdistan?,” Barzani responded, “I believe, yes, we have a very good opportunity. But we have a lot of challenges as well. How we can — I mean an independent Kurdistan — first of all we have to convince at least one country around us. Without convincing them, we cannot do this. Being landlocked we have to have a partner, a regional power to be convinced and internationally, a major power to be convinced to support that. What we want right now is to have an economic independence within Iraq.”
The Turkish government’s efforts toward the construction of oil and gas pipelines directly connecting the KRG-controlled oil and gas fields to Turkey without the approval of the Iraqi federal government could be a step toward fulfilling the first “challenge” cited by Barzani. After economic independence within Iraq, the eventual target it seems is an independent Kurdistan. The one country the Kurds need to support them will reinforce their landlocked country’s quest for independence. What country could they possibly have in mind?
Necdet Pamir is chief editor of EnerjiEnergy.com and an instructor at Bilkent University.
Read more: http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2013/02/turkey-krg-relations-strain-future-iraq-oil-interests.html#ixzz2Lwc1Eg8c
The head of Israel’s National Security Council met a Turkish official in an attempt to restore ties, but to no avail.
Mavi Marmara
A recent Israeli attempt to restore the strained relations with Turkey failed, according to a report on Channel 2 News on Saturday night.
According to the report, the head of Israel’s National Security Council, Yaakov Amidror, recently met in Rome with the Director-General of the Foreign Ministry in Ankara.
The meeting was held at the initiative of Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu’s Office and was also attended by Joseph Ciechanover, formerly the Director-General of the Israeli Foreign Ministry. However, the meeting failed and no agreements were reached.
Israel’s relationship with Turkey broke down completely after the 2010 incident on the Mavi Marmara ship.
The vessel, owned by the Turkish IHH group, was one of six sent to illegally breach Israel’s maritime blockade of Gaza as a “humanitarian flotilla” but was found to be carrying nothing.
When the vessels ignored repeated Israeli navy requests to redirect their boats to Ashdod port, IDF commandos boarded each vessel to force them to port, where the humanitarian aid they were allegedly carrying could be off-loaded and carried to Gaza through the land crossings with Israel.
In the case of the Mavi Marmara, however, the Israeli soldiers – armed only with pistols and paint-ball training guns — were brutally attacked by the “activists” as they boarded, with several critically injured. The commandos who followed them shot and killed their attackers, leaving nine dead.
Turkish leaders have demanded an apology from Israel over the incident, but Israeli leaders have refused, saying Israel had acted in self-defense.
Former Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman emphasized in the past that Israel is ready to solve any outstanding disputes with Turkey, but it will not apologize to Ankara for the raid on the Mavi Marmara.
Turkey has several times rejected offers by Israel to improve relations. Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erodgan has chosen to deepen the conflict by continuously verbally attacking Israel.
Earlier this month, Erdogan accused Israel of waging “state terrorism”, condemning an alleged Israeli air strike in Syria as an unacceptable violation of international law.
Tags: Mavi Marmara ,Yaakov Amidror ,Israel-Turkey relations
via Israeli Initiative with Turkey Fails – Middle East – News – Israel National News.
TEHRAN – Three kamancheh virtuosos from Iran, Turkey and Greece have come together to perform a concert at the Cemal Resit Rey Hall of Istanbul on March 5.
Kayhan Kalhor from Iran, Derya Turkan from Turkey, and Sokratis Sinopoulos from Greece will perform the concert entitled “Night of Kamancheh”, the Cemal Resit Rey Hall announced on Saturday.
The musicians have organized the program to highlight the power the Iranian instrument.
The Iranian santur virtuoso Ali Bahrami-Fard will also accompany the group in some performances.
They will perform classic pieces of their own country as well as some improvisations during the concert.
Kalhor has previously collaborated with some international musicians.
The most recent one was his joint performance with the Turkish baglama player, Erdal Erzincan, at the GlobalFest, New York’s annual world music festival in January 2013.
SB/YAW
END
via Iranian, Turkish, Greek musicians team up for Istanbul concert – Tehran Times.