Category: Middle East & Africa

  • Iraq’s Constitution, Kirkuk and the Disputed Territories

    Iraq’s Constitution, Kirkuk and the Disputed Territories

    Iraq’s Constitution, Kirkuk and the Disputed Territories
    Brendan O’Leary and David Bateman, UPenn
    . org/docs/ pdf_files/ OLeary_Paper. pdf

    POWER POINT PRESENTATION (PAY ATTENTION TO MAPS)
    . org/docs/ pdf_files/ OLeary_SLIDES. pdf

     

    __._,_.___

  • Israel, Iran and the new neocons

    Israel, Iran and the new neocons

    August 9, 2008

    ANP: Neocons say Bush should let Israel attack Iran after election day before new president takes office.

    American News Project: Washington’s neocons are alive and well, advising both John McCain and President Bush. Now many are saying Bush should permit Israel to attack Iran’s nuclear facilities after Election Day before the new president takes office. ANP investigates as we chase down John Bolton, Bill Kristol and Frank Gaffney to see how far ahead these hawks are thinking. And a new report says the whole plan could backfire.

  • Ahmadinejad’s visit to Turkey “unfortunate” – Israel

    Ahmadinejad’s visit to Turkey “unfortunate” – Israel

    Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad

    By Zerin Elci

     

    ANKARA (Reuters) – Israel has expressed its “discomfort” to Turkey over its decision to invite Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to Istanbul next week, an Israeli diplomatic official said on Friday.

     

    Ahmadinejad will discuss Iran’s disputed nuclear programme and growing bilateral ties with Turkey during a one-day working visit on Aug 14, which comes after months of lobbying by Tehran.

     

    Predominantly Sunni Muslim Turkey, which has good ties with Israel, has offered to help resolve a dispute between Iran and the West over Tehran’s nuclear programme, which the West fears is aimed at producing atomic weapons.

     

    “We see this visit as unfortunate, especially in the sensitive and crucial time in which Iran is not giving a direct reply to the West about its nuclear programme,” the Israeli diplomatic official based in Ankara told Reuters.

     

    “The Iranian president keeps calling for the destruction of the Israeli state and denies the Holocaust, so this visit is unfortunate because it gives legitimacy to Iran,” the official said, adding Israel had relayed its position to the Turkish Foreign Ministry.

     

    Turkey and Iran have growing trade ties and are negotiating expanding energy cooperation. President Abdullah Gul and Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan have also sought to boost Turkey’s role as a regional problem solver in the Middle East.

     

    Turkey is also acting as mediator in indirect talks between Israel and Syria, but the Israeli diplomatic official said Ahmadinejad’s visit will not affect those negotiations.

     

    Major powers fear Tehran wants to build an atomic bomb. Iran, the world’s fourth-largest oil producer, insists it is only seeking to master nuclear technology to generate power.

  • Israel irked over Iranian leader’s planned visit to Turkey

    Israel irked over Iranian leader’s planned visit to Turkey

    Mahmoud Ahmadinejad

    ANKARA (AFP) — Israel has conveyed its misgivings to Turkey over a planned visit to the country by Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, an Israeli diplomat said Friday.

    “We are concerned about this visit because we think it is not the appropriate time to host the Iranian president,” the diplomat, who asked not to be named, told AFP.

    Israel voiced its concerns Thursday when the Turkish ambassador in Tel Aviv was summoned to the Israeli foreign ministry and the Israeli ambassador in Ankara visited the Turkish foreign ministry, the official said.

    “It is not a good idea to give legitimacy” to a leader who has called for the destruction of Israel and denies the Holocaust, moreover at a time when Western powers are mulling fresh sanctions against Iran over its controversial nuclear programme, he said.

    Non-Arab and secular Turkey has been Israel’s main regional ally since 1996, when the two signed a military cooperation accord, much to the anger of Arab countries and Iran.

    It is currently acting as mediator in indirect talks between Israel and its arch-foe Syria.

    But mainly Muslim Turkey has recently improved ties with Iran, its eastern neighbour, and argues that its close dialogue both with the West and Tehran could be an asset for a peaceful resolution of the international standoff over Iran’s nuclear programme.

    Turkish officials have said Ahmadinejad will soon visit the country, without giving a date.

    The visit is reportedly expected to take place on August 14.

    The media have said Ahmadinejad is expected to meet with Turkish leaders in Istanbul rather than the capital Ankara, where the protocol would have required him to visit the tomb of Turkey’s secularist father Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, which the head of the Islamic state was reportedly reluctant to do.

  • Israel likely to skip next UN racism conference

    Israel likely to skip next UN racism conference

    GENEVA (AP) — Israel will almost surely boycott the next U.N. racism conference in Geneva, its ambassador said Wednesday, warning that the meeting is likely to sink into the same anti-Semitism that prompted the U.S. and Israel to walk out of the last one seven years ago.

    Itzhak Levanon, the Jewish state’s departing U.N. envoy in Geneva, said the event April 20-25 would need to be completely reworked for Israel to participate.

    But with Libya chairing preparations, and Iran and Cuba also involved, Levanon said the Geneva follow-up to the contentious 2001 conference in the South African city of Durban had the making of another international “bashing of Israel.”

    “We want them to discuss human rights, and not only focus on Israel and turning this into an anti-Semitic event,” he said in an interview with The Associated Press. “We will attend the meeting only if there is a radical, substantive change.”

    Canada is the only country that has explicitly said it will not take part in “Durban II,” arguing the meeting will promote racism and not combat it.

    The Bush administration has taken a symbolic position opposing the conference. In December, Washington cast the only “no” vote when the U.N. General Assembly passed a two-year budget because of objections to funding for the conference.

    The State Department has said, however, that a decision whether to attend will be made closer to the time of the conference.

    In 2001, the World Conference Against Racism ended three days before the Sept. 11 attacks, with a declaration and program of action that divided countries even as they agreed to it.

    Dominated by clashes over the Middle East and the legacy of slavery, the U.S. and Israel walked out midway through the eight-day meeting over a draft resolution that singled out Israel for criticism and likened Zionism — the movement to establish and maintain a Jewish state — to racism.

    Those references were removed from the final declaration, though it did cite “the plight of the Palestinians” as an issue.

    A parallel forum of non-governmental organizations, however, branded “Israel as a racist apartheid state” and called for an end to the “ongoing, Israeli systematic perpetration of racist crimes, including war crimes, acts of genocide and ethnic cleansing.”

    Levanon said the anti-Israel speeches at Durban were a “shame” and that Israel would not have any part in a repetition. But he said the nations that led the attacks on Israel have offered no encouraging signs that the next meeting will be different.

    “Yes, the Europeans say it should not be anti-Semitic and the Israelis are demanding a focus on human rights around the world,” he said. “But what about those that did the bashing? They’ve said nothing.”

    Source: AP, 06 Agust 2008

  • Rwanda points a finger at Paris

    Rwanda points a finger at Paris

    Published: August 6 2008 20:12 | Last updated: August 6 2008 20:12

    Rwanda has produced the most detailed account yet of France’s role during the 1994 Rwandan genocide. The report released in Kigali follows a four year inquiry. It implicates top officials in the French political and military establishment, including François Mitterand, then president, his son, Jean-Christophe, two former prime ministers and a host of military officers.

    Some of the allegations are new. Some have been around for a long time. But the thrust is that Paris gave diplomatic cover and provided military training and arms to Hutu extremists who carried out the slaughter of 1m ethnic Tutsis and moderate Hutus. There are new details of training that French officers gave to the civil defence units that became the Interahamwe militias responsible for leading the massacres. The report suggests that Paris was providing arms well after the atrocities had begun. It also alleges some French personnel participated directly in war crimes. If there is compelling evidence, they should face justice.

    Washington, London, the UN and others were guilty of standing by as the ugliest chapter in modern African history was scripted. Paris is being accused of much worse: active complicity in the writing of it.

    As could be expected, the French have hit back, describing the allegations as “unacceptable” and questioning the independence of the government appointed committee that carried out the inquiry. There may well be propaganda and exaggeration. The suggestion that French officials knowingly connived in preparations for genocide might not withstand scrutiny.

    But there is substance to Rwanda’s accusation that France allowed the conditions for genocide to develop by supporting a client regime even after it started committing war crimes. Paris has still to acknowledge its errors and issue any form of apology to Rwanda – a source of immense grievance to survivors of the massacres. It also explains why Rwanda has felt it necessary to put on record its version of events.

    This was the nadir of France’s relationship with client states in Francophone Africa. President Nicolas Sarkozy has almost admitted as much, but he needs to do more. Many leading political figures in France have been outspoken in criticizing Turkey for its failure to examine whether the massacre of Armenians during the collapse of the Ottoman empire amounted to genocide. They cite this as a reason Turkey does not belong in the European Union. They need to be honest about their own behaviour in Rwanda.